Appendix a Public Notice and Scoping Material

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix a Public Notice and Scoping Material APPENDIX A PUBLIC NOTICE AND SCOPING MATERIAL PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING HANDOUT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Proposed ,PSOHPHQWDWLRQRIWKH1DWLRQDO*XDUG%XUHDX¶V Updated Training Plan 60-1, Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Arizona The National Guard Bureau (NGB), issued in 1978 to address the new Air National Guard (ANG) has activities occurring under OSB at recently updated their Training Plan DMAFB. Another NEPA document (TP) 60-1. This updated plan prepared since that time that DGGUHVVHV WKH 1*%¶V PDQDJHPHQW included analysis of OSB activities of Operation Snowbird (OSB) at was the 2002 Final Environmental Davis-Monthan Air Force Base Assessment for the West Coast (DMAFB), Arizona. OSB is a Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR) SURJUDP WKDW LV PDQDJHG E\ $1*¶V Beddown. Thus, that 2002 EA will be 162nd Fighter Wing (162 FW), used as the baseline for the EA to be Detachment 1 (Det 1). Separate prepared to assess the potential from OSB, routine ANG activities are impacts on the human and natural conducted by the 162 FW out of the environment of the proposed Tucson International Airport (TIA). implementation of the NGB TP 60-1 at DMAFB. OSB has been in existence since 1975 and was originally designed DMAFB provides all of the facilities and implemented to allow ANG units and assets essential to the success from bases located in northern RI 1*%¶V WUDLQLQJ PLVVLRQ 7KHVH ODWLWXGHV RU³QRUWKHUQWLHU´ WRWUDLQLQ include but are not limited to: optimal weather conditions and vast airspace over southern Arizona, Facilities and Administration primarily during the winter months. x 13,643-foot runway The OSB program is headquartered Live Ordnance Loading Area out of DMAFB, which is one of the x Live munitions storage and 86 $LU )RUFH¶V $LU &RPEDW build-up facilities Command (ACC) bases. The 162 FW Det 1 OSB is considered a x Bulk Fuel Storage/Loading tenant at DMAFB, and the OSB Area activities discussed in this x On-base medical, lodging, Environmental Assessment (EA) in and dining facilities accordance with the National x On-base master Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of mechanics/maintenance for 1969 are being addressed by the A-10 and F-16 aircraft Headquarters (HQ), ACC. The 355th Fighter Wing (355 FW) completed an EA and a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) was Infrastructure Assets conditions and present use, and potential cumulative effects to x Secure communications socioeconomic and environmental Data link infrastructure x concerns. x Dedicated aerospace ground equipment (AGE) The public scoping meeting is being x Access to existing engine conducted to provide a forum that analysis laboratory allows the public to make comments x Existing, dedicated ramp and provide input relevant to the space proposed action, alternatives and proposed areas of analysis. In Safety and Operational Assets addition, the meeting provides a x Crash/Fire/Rescue response forum for the Air Force to discuss the unit NEPA process and the alternatives x Immediate access to currently being considered. hydrazine storage and emergency response for F-16 The public is invited to attend the aircraft informal meeting and ask questions x Existing Anti-terrorism and or provide comments regarding the Force Protection systems proposed alternatives. It is requested that all comments be provided x Close proximity to available military airspace and comments either be provided on the enhanced electronic tactical attached comment sheet, or sent via ranges e-mail to DMAFB at [email protected]. All comments The NGB and ACC, through the U.S. will be considered during the Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), preparation of the EA. Please refer Sacramento District intends to questions to officials attending the prepare an Environmental public meeting. Written comments Assessment (EA) to address the following the public meeting will be potential effects of the accepted through 26 October 2011 implementation of the NGB TP 60-1 and can be sent to the DMAFB at DMAFB. The EA will assess the Public Affairs Office at the following environmental and socioeconomic address: impacts, adverse and beneficial, of all reasonable alternatives that ATTN: OSB EA COMMENT SUBMITTAL, 355th Fighter Wing satisfy the 1*%¶Vpurpose and need for the training mission. The No Public Affairs, 3180 S. First Street, Action Alternative, as required by Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ 85707 NEPA, will also be considered in the EA. The No Action Alternative would maintain the level and types of aircraft that were analyzed in the 2002 EA. The EA will provide information on all reasonable alternatives with regards to existing PUBLIC COMMENTS ON 2012 DRAFT EA From: MARYLOU AND NORM FEIGER [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 3:22 PM To: 355 FW/PA 355th FW Public Affairs Subject: OSB EA Comment Submittal In Reference to more flyer planes, besides the F15,F16, F etc and etc. I have lived in my house for 30 years, and now I am in my last years of life. I believe I should have a peaceeful life. Jets flying at night, would kill me quickly, as ample sleep is what keeps us alive. I love my home and surroundings, and this would errupt my world. Majority of the homeowners in my area, all believe the same as me. Only they are not knowledgeable to computers. They still ask me what happened the the 4 propellor planes. The EA Misleads the Public. How can the Air Force say that there IS NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FOUND. I had a good laugh at this, as with anything that disrupts the quality of living for any age person, THAT IS A SIGNIGICANT IMPACT. I would love to read a report, with the backed up data, in Non-Technical terms, so that I can share this with my wonderful neighborhood. Many changes are made without the corrections being made to the public. Is this all a SECRET? WHAT DOES RUNWAY 12 AND RUNWAY 30 MEAN? I believe this jargon shows the disinterest the air force has in the people who have lived theri lives out in the vacinity of DM. I do not support the OSB EXPANSION PROPOSAL. I don't need to read about a 2007 noise study that was made, indicating NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT. When I cannot hear my husband talking right next to me, while the F16's are overhear, how is this bettering the quality of my life. You can laugh at this, but I have perfect hearing, it's the Air Force that tries to lead us to believe that the sounds have no impact. What about the noise levels for all those infants, that will grow up needing hearing airs before they get into first grade. That's where the joke is, what do you think we are, a bunch of dummies? Think this over carefuly. As Tucson Forward will not give up, until the people are satisfied. From: Kathleen Williamson, Esq. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 9:24 PM To: 355 FW/PA 355th FW Public Affairs Subject: OSB EA Comment Submittal ATTN: OSB EA COMMENT SUBMITTAL 355th Fighter Wing Public Affairs 3180 S. First Street Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ 85707 mailto:[email protected] 757-764-5994 (Air Combat Command Public Affairs) or 228-3398 (D-M Public Affairs) (Sent via email rather than telephonically or snail mail) Dear OSB EA Comment Panel: I thoroughly agree with the Tucson Forward position regarding the flaws and biases of the EA recently conducted regarding Operation Snowbird in Tucson. I lived under that flight path for 20 years (4th and Lee area). It has had a bad impact on Tucson all these years but has gotten worse since the early 2000s. Now it threatens to double and include night flights while presenting a skewed EA claiming that these increases would not have a negative impact on Tucson. It already does and the negative impact would double at a minimum. Also, night flights is an obnoxious idea. We have rights to quiet enjoyment of our homes and rights to safety from jet accidents and air pollution caused by over head flights. The US military is the largest consumer of fossil fuels in the world, at taxpayer's expense and is dumping its toxic waste on American citizens. To make matters worse, it allows foreign pilots to train over the homes of American citizens in urban areas like Tucson. Tucs! on has invested tremendous amounts of money in urban planning and historic preservation, all of which suffers under the noise and danger of overhead flights. If our town council and county government cared about citizens at all, they would object to the degredation of our beautiful area and lives due to overhead flights. Do not double the damage you already do to Tucson. Regarding the faulty EA, here are just a few comments: Environmental Justice Cover Letter, lines 47-49 "There would be no additional disproportionately high and adverse impacts on minority and low-income populations near DMAFB compared to those impacts associated with No Action Alternative." The Table 2-4 on page 2-13 does identify a minority low-income area that is disproportionately impacted under the OSB "No Action Alternative" and yet it concludes that doubling the number of OSB sorties and adding night flights "would likely be imperceptible to residents." This doesn't make common sense. ES-3-ES-4 "These expansions in the noise contours would be imperceptible to the residents as the changes in contours would be less than 50 feet. Public safety risks would not be measurably increased under any of the alternatives." These conclusions are based on incomplete data used in the noise modeling and noise averaging. Common sense tells us that you can't double the number flights and introduce night flights and have no significant impact on the quality of life and safety of the residents in an area already identified in violation of Environmental Justice Regulation .
Recommended publications
  • Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 11, folder “Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 11 of The John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON October 31, 197 5 MEMORANDUM TO: JACK MARSH FROM: RUSS ROURKE I discussed the Ft. Dix situation with Rep. Ed Forsythe again. As you may know, I reviewed the matter with Marty Hoffman at noon yesterday, and with Col. Kenneth Bailey several days ago. Actually, I exchanged intelligence information with him. Hoffman and Bailey advised me that no firm decision has as yet been made with regard to the retention of the training function at Dix. On Novem­ ber 5, Marty Hotfman will receive a briefing by Army staff on pos­ sible "back fill'' organizations that may be available to go to Dix in the event the training function moves out.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the Inn at Davis-Monthan Davis-Monthan AFB, Arizona 355Th Force Support Squadron
    Welcome to the Inn at Davis-Monthan Davis-Monthan AFB, Arizona 355th Force Support Squadron The appearance of local business names does NOT imply federal endorsements. All information to include addresses and telephone numbers are subject to change. Please call the business to confirm their operation hours. Please do not remove this directory from your room. PAGE 1 WELCOME LODGING GUESTS We are pleased you have chosen to stay at the Heritage Inn on Davis-Monthan as our guest and we look forward to making your stay comfortable, safe and pleasant. On behalf of the Fighter Wing commander, Mission Support Group commander, Force Support Squadron commander and the lodging staff, we welcome you to Davis-Monthan Air Force Base. This directory has been especially prepared to provide you useful information regarding the Inn on Davis-Monthan policies, the City of Tucson and available guest services. Any commercial establishments listed in the guide are provided to you only as a convenience. We sincerely welcome your comments and recommendations to assist us in improving our service to you. You may do this by calling the reception center or by completing the Air Force Lodging Customer Comment Card, provided in your room or Online Lodging Website. We strive for excellence and guest service is our number one priority. Please take a moment to let us know how we are doing. If we can help in any way to make your visit more enjoyable, safe or comfortable, please call us. You can reach the manager on duty anytime by dialing “0” from your guest room phone.
    [Show full text]
  • Davis-Monthan Air Force Base 2016 [Economic Impact Analysis]
    Davis-Monthan Air Force Base 2016 [Economic Impact Analysis] Preface Commander’s Foreword 2 The History of Davis-Monthan AFB 3 Economic Impact Tables Table 1 – Executive Summary 4 Table 2-3 – Total Personnel / Annual Payroll by Classification and 5 Housing Location Table 4-5 – Total Civilian Personnel / Payroll by Appropriated and 6 Non-Appropriated Funds Table 6 – Expense Report 7 Table 7-8 – Indirect Jobs Created / Tucson Retiree Data 8 Table 9 – Economic Impact Estimate 9 Economic Impact Charts Chart 1 – Annual Economic Impact Estimates (w/o retirees) 9 Chart 2-3 – Appropriated Funds Military Payroll / Assigned 10 Chart 4-5 – Appropriated Funds Civilian Payroll / Military Retiree 11 Payments Chart 6-7 – Annual Estimated Jobs Created ($M / # Jobs) 12 1 Davis-Monthan Air Force Base [Economic Impact Analysis] 2016 PREFACE Commander’s Foreword Davis-Monthan Air Force Base (D-M AFB) is pleased to present its Economic Impact Analysis for Fiscal Year 2016. The Wing’s mission is clear: Deploy, employ, support, and sustain attack airpower in support of Combatant Commanders anywhere in the world at a moment’s notice; train the finest attack pilots for the Combat Air Forces; provide every member of Team D-M with responsive, tailored, mission-focused base support. The Wing’s vision is resolute: A premier Fighter Wing comprised of resilient Airmen, armed with precise tools and training; powered by a culture of leadership and innovation; prepared to provide responsive combat airpower which exceeds Combatant Command expectations for excellence. Members of D-M AFB live, work, and educate their children in the Tucson area.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Office of the Secretary
    Monday, May 16, 2005 Part LXII Department of Defense Office of the Secretary Base Closures and Realignments (BRAC); Notice VerDate jul<14>2003 10:07 May 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\16MYN2.SGM 16MYN2 28030 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 93 / Monday, May 16, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Headquarters U.S. Army Forces Budget/Funding, Contracting, Command (FORSCOM), and the Cataloging, Requisition Processing, Office of the Secretary Headquarters U.S. Army Reserve Customer Services, Item Management, Command (USARC) to Pope Air Force Stock Control, Weapon System Base Closures and Realignments Base, NC. Relocate the Headquarters 3rd Secondary Item Support, Requirements (BRAC) U.S. Army to Shaw Air Force Base, SC. Determination, Integrated Materiel AGENCY: Department of Defense. Relocate the Installation Management Management Technical Support ACTION: Notice of Recommended Base Agency Southeastern Region Inventory Control Point functions for Closures and Realignments. Headquarters and the U.S. Army Consumable Items to Defense Supply Network Enterprise Technology Center Columbus, OH, and reestablish SUMMARY: The Secretary of Defense is Command (NETCOM) Southeastern them as Defense Logistics Agency authorized to recommend military Region Headquarters to Fort Eustis, VA. Inventory Control Point functions; installations inside the United States for Relocate the Army Contracting Agency relocate the procurement management closure and realignment in accordance Southern Region Headquarters to Fort and related support functions for Depot with Section 2914(a) of the Defense Base Sam Houston. Level Reparables to Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, and designate them as Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, as Operational Army (IGPBS) amended (Pub.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Arizona Military Assets a $5.4 Billion Status Report Pg:12
    Summer 2014 TucsonChamber.org WHAT’S INSIDE: Higher State Standards Southern Arizona Military Assets 2nd Session/51st Legislature Improve Southern Arizona’s A $5.4 Billion Status Report pg:12 / Report Card pg:22 / Economic Outlook pg:29 B:9.25” T:8.75” S:8.25” WHETHER YOU’RE AT THE OFFICE OR ON THE GO, COX BUSINESS KEEPS YOUR B:11.75” S:10.75” BUSINESS RUNNING. T:11.25” In today’s world, your business counts on the reliability of technology more than ever. Cox Business provides the communication tools you need for your company to make sure your primary focus is on what it should be—your business and your customers. Switch with confidence knowing that Cox Business is backed by our 24/7 dedicated, local customer support and a 30-day Money-Back Guarantee. BUSINESS INTERNET 10 /mo* AND VOICE $ • Internet speeds up to 10 Mbps ~ ~ • 5 Security Suite licenses and 5 GB of 99 Online Backup FREE PRO INSTALL WITH • Unlimited nationwide long distance A 3-YEAR AGREEMENT* IT’S TIME TO GET DOWN TO BUSINESS. CALL 520-207-9576 OR VISIT COXBUSINESS.COM *Offer ends 8/31/14. Available to new customers of Cox Business VoiceManager℠ Office service and Cox Business Internet℠ 10 (max. 10/2 Mbps). Prices based on 1-year service term. Equipment may be required. Prices exclude equipment, installation, taxes, and fees, unless indicated. Phone modem provided by Cox, requires electricity, and has battery backup. Access to E911 may not be available during extended power outage. Speeds not guaranteed; actual speeds vary.
    [Show full text]
  • Each Cadet Squadron Is Sponsored by an Active Duty Unit. Below Is The
    Each Cadet Squadron is sponsored by an Active Duty Unit. Below is the listing for the Cadet Squadron and the Sponsor Unit CS SPONSOR WING BASE MAJCOM 1 1st Fighter Wing 1 FW Langley AFB VA ACC 2 388th Fighter Wing 388 FW Hill AFB UT ACC 3 60th Air Mobility Wing 60 AMW Travis AFB CA AMC 4 15th Wing 15 WG Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam PACAF 5 12th Flying Training Wing 12 FTW Randolph AFB TX AETC 6 4th Fighter Wing 4 FW Seymour Johonson AFB NC ACC 7 49th Fighter Wing 49 FW Holloman AFB NM ACC 8 46th Test Wing 46 TW Eglin AFB FL AFMC 9 23rd Wing 23 WG Moody AFB GA ACC 10 56th Fighter Wing 56 FW Luke AFB AZ AETC 11 55th Wing AND 11th Wing 55WG AND 11WG Offutt AFB NE AND Andrews AFB ACC 12 325th Fighter Wing 325 FW Tyndall AFB FL AETC 13 92nd Air Refueling Wing 92 ARW Fairchild AFB WA AMC 14 412th Test Wing 412 TW Edwards AFB CA AFMC 15 355th Fighter Wing 375 AMW Scott AFB IL AMC 16 89th Airlift Wing 89 AW Andrews AFB MD AMC 17 437th Airlift Wing 437 AW Charleston AFB SC AMC 18 314th Airlift Wing 314 AW Little Rock AFB AR AETC 19 19th Airlift Wing 19 AW Little Rock AFB AR AMC 20 20th Fighter Wing 20 FW Shaw AFB SC ACC 21 366th Fighter Wing AND 439 AW 366 FW Mountain Home AFB ID AND Westover ARB ACC/AFRC 22 22nd Air Refueling Wing 22 ARW McConnell AFB KS AMC 23 305th Air Mobility Wing 305 AMW McGuire AFB NJ AMC 24 375th Air Mobility Wing 355 FW Davis-Monthan AFB AZ ACC 25 432nd Wing 432 WG Creech AFB ACC 26 57th Wing 57 WG Nellis AFB NV ACC 27 1st Special Operations Wing 1 SOW Hurlburt Field FL AFSOC 28 96th Air Base Wing AND 434th ARW 96 ABW
    [Show full text]
  • Swing Left AZ-02 District Primer
    Know Before You Go: AZ-02 District Primer September 2018 • Researched, summarized, and edited by Swing Left’s all-volunteer research team! In the last election, Republican Martha McSally won this district by 44,000 votes (14%). But the district voted for Clinton in 2016. With your help, we’re going to win this seat for the Democrats in 2018. About the Republican Candidate About the Democratic Candidate Introduction: Republican Lea Marquez Peterson was Introduction: Democrat Ann Kirkpatrick previously nominated as as AZ-02’s Republican opponent to Ann represented AZ-01 for three terms and previously served in Kirkpatrick for the 2018 midterm elections, replacing the Arizona House of Representatives. Kirkpatrick was born Congresswoman Martha McSally, who is running for the and raised in rural Arizona, graduating from college and U.S. Senate in Arizona. Marquez Peterson has run several law school at the University of Arizona. Kirkpatrick and her businesses, including owning and operating a chain of gas husband live near Tucson, near their adult children and stations and convenience stores, and a business brokerage grandchildren. firm. She is currently the CEO and President of the Tucson Hispanic Chamber of Commerce. Issues: Kirkpatrick’s campaign is focused on the economy, building infrastructure in Arizona, and ensuring health care Issues: Marquez Peterson supports strong border security, for everyone. Kirkpatrick voted for the ACA. She supports including President Trump's wall. She supports the repeal the DISCLOSE Act, which requires reporting of dark money and replacement of the ACA, favoring in its place "a system spent in elections, and the Government By the People Act that works," but offers no specifics.
    [Show full text]
  • Brigadier General Randall K. "Randy" Bigum
    BRIGADIER GENERAL RANDALL K. "RANDY" BIGUM BRIGADIER GENERAL RANDALL K. "RANDY" BIGUM Retired Oct. 1, 2001. Brig. Gen. Randall K. "Randy" Bigum is director of requirements, Headquarters Air Combat Command, Langley Air Force Base, Va. As director, he is responsible for all functions relating to the acquisition of weapons systems for the combat air forces, to include new systems and modifications to existing systems. He manages the definition of operational requirements, the translation of requirements to systems capabilities and the subsequent operational evaluation of the new or modified systems. He also chairs the Combat Air Forces Requirements Oversight Council for modernization investment planning. He directs a staff of seven divisions, three special management offices and three operating locations, and he actively represents the warfighter in defining future requirements while supporting the acquisition of today's combat systems. The general was born in Lubbock, Texas. A graduate of Ohio State University, Columbus, with a bachelor of science degree in business, he entered the Air Force in 1973. He served as commander of the 53rd Tactical Fighter Squadron at Bitburg Air Base, Germany, the 18th Operations Group at Kadena Air Base, Japan, and the 4th Fighter Wing at Seymour Johnson Air Force Base, S.C. He has served at Headquarters Tactical Air Command and the Pentagon, and at U.S. European Command in Stuttgart- Vaihingen where he was executive officer to the deputy commander in chief. The general is a command pilot with more than 3,000 flight hours in fighter aircraft. He flew more than 320 combat hours in the F- 15C during Operation Desert Storm.
    [Show full text]
  • So Long Loughner: a Life Sentence for a Framed Patsy
    Stephanie Sledge – So Long Loughner SO LONG LOUGHNER: A LIFE SENTENCE FOR A FRAMED PATSY Sentencing day: New evidence, facts, and suppressed info- Could Loughner be innocent? By Stephanie Sledge 06Nov2012 : Revised 05Nov2018 http://www.thegovernmentrag.com/so‐long‐loughner‐a‐life‐sentence‐for‐a‐framed‐patsy.html "America is now part of the history of Communism. Interesting way to think of it, wouldn't you say?"- Dieter Heinlander; Gerta, "We would have been better off in East Germany" - Amerika, Mini Series, 1987 Jared Lee Loughner will be sentenced after accepting a guilty plea bargain on November 8th, 2012 for the alleged Tucson Safeway shooting rampage that took place on January 8th, 2011. Six people were gunned down and 13 others allegedly injured. Among the dead was a federal judge and a 9-year old girl named, Christina-Taylor Green. From the beginning, it was reported Jared Lee Loughner was a crazy, deranged schizophrenic psychopath that lacked the help of the mental health industry, went on a killing spree, and then drank the federal penitentiary pharmaceutical ‘kool-aid’ mixture which brought him back to sanity. At least long enough ‘sanity’ for him to enter into a guilty plea. Now, in just a few days, Loughner will be sentenced to life in prison. Page 1 of 30 Stephanie Sledge – So Long Loughner But, wait a minute, back it up! Could Jared Lee Loughner actually be an innocent man? It is apparent Loughner’s attorney, CIA Judy Clarke has no interest in investigating this case, nor exposing any inconsistencies. Has Clarke failed to adequately investigate or prepare for Jared Lee Loughner’s trial? Why would Jared take a plea when all the evidence points to a well-prepared and premeditated PSYOP, which used Loughner as a patsy scapegoat? It appears Loughner will be pleading guilty after months of sitting in a federal psychiatric ward begging the court system to stop forcibly medicating him.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOGRAPHICAL DATA BOO KK Class 2020-2 27
    BBIIOOGGRRAAPPHHIICCAALL DDAATTAA BBOOOOKK Class 2020-2 27 Jan - 28 Feb 2020 National Defense University NDU PRESIDENT Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge, USN 16th President Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge is an honors graduate of the University of Minnesota with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering and was commissioned through the Reserve Officers' Training Corps program. He earned a Master of Science in Engineering Management from the Catholic University of America and a Master of Arts with highest distinction in National Security and Strategic Studies from the Naval War College. He was a fellow of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Seminar XXI program. VADM Fritz Roegge, NDU President (Photo His sea tours include USS Whale (SSN 638), USS by NDU AV) Florida (SSBN 728) (Blue), USS Key West (SSN 722) and command of USS Connecticut (SSN 22). His major command tour was as commodore of Submarine Squadron 22 with additional duty as commanding officer, Naval Support Activity La Maddalena, Italy. Ashore, he has served on the staffs of both the Atlantic and the Pacific Submarine Force commanders, on the staff of the director of Naval Nuclear Propulsion, on the Navy staff in the Assessments Division (N81) and the Military Personnel Plans and Policy Division (N13), in the Secretary of the Navy's Office of Legislative Affairs at the U. S, House of Representatives, as the head of the Submarine and Nuclear Power Distribution Division (PERS 42) at the Navy Personnel Command, and as an assistant deputy director on the Joint Staff in both the Strategy and Policy (J5) and the Regional Operations (J33) Directorates.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Directory ARIZONA
    12 Congressional Directory ARIZONA Arizona Democratic Party; to honor his success as Mayor, the City of Tempe erected a 35- foot statute of Harry in downtown Tempe and renamed the city’s government center the Harry E. Mitchell Government Complex; served as an adjunct professor at his alma mater, ASU; fam- ily: married to Marianne; two children; five grandchildren; committees: Science and Tech- nology; Transportation and Infrastructure; Veterans’ Affairs; elected to the 110th Congress on November 7, 2006; reelected to the 111th Congress. Office Listings http://mitchell.house.gov 1410 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 ............................. (202) 225–2190 Chief of Staff.—Alexis Tameron. FAX: 225–3263 Executive Assistant.—Chris Quigley. Legislative Assistants: Carrie Solomon, Paul Swanson, Matthew Weisman. Special Assistant / Tour Coordinator.—Caitlyn Cardineau. Communications Director.—Adam Bozzi. 7201 East Camelback Road, Suite 335, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 .................................. (480) 946–2411 Counties: MARICOPA (part). CITIES AND TOWNSHIPS: Chandler, Fountain Hills, Mesa, Phoenix, Rio Verde, Scottsdale, Tempe. Ahwatukee, the Salt River Pima Indian Reservation, and the Fort McDowell Yavapai Apache Indian Reservation. Population (2000), 641,329. ZIP Codes: 85008, 85018, 85044–45, 05048, 85070, 85076, 85201–03, 85210, 85215, 85224–26, 85250–64, 85267–69, 85274, 85287, 85331, 85281, 85283 *** SIXTH DISTRICT JEFF FLAKE, Republican, of Mesa, AZ; born in Snowflake, AZ, December 31, 1962; education: Brigham
    [Show full text]