DOCSLIB.ORG

Fountain Wind Project, Final Environmental Impact

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fountain Wind Project, Final Environmental Impact Shasta County Department of Resource Management Planning Division FOUNTAIN WIND PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT – VOLUME 1 April 2021 Use Permit No. UP 16-007 State Clearinghouse No. 2019012029 Prepared for: Department of Resource Management Planning Division Prepared by: Environmental Science Associates Shasta County Department of Resource Management Planning Division FOUNTAIN WIND PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT – VOLUME 1 April 2021 Use Permit No. UP 16-007 State Clearinghouse No. 2019012029 Prepared for: Shasta County Department of Resource Management, Planning Division Prepared by: Environmental Science Associates TABLE OF CONTENTS Fountain Wind Project Final Environmental Impact Report Page Volume 1 Chapter 1, Introduction ........................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Project Overview ..................................................................................................1-2 1.2.1 Project Site ................................................................................................1-2 1.2.2 Project Summary .......................................................................................1-3 1.2.3 Changes to the Project Since Issuance of the Draft EIR ..........................1-3 1.3 Agency and Public Involvement ........................................................................ 1-23 1.3.1 Agency and Public Review of the Draft EIR .......................................... 1-23 1.3.2 Availability of the Final EIR .................................................................... 1-23 Chapter 2, Responses to Comments ..................................................................................2-1 2.1 Approach to Comment Responses ......................................................................2-1 2.1.1 Input Received ..........................................................................................2-1 2.1.2 Comment Coding ................................................................................... 2-13 2.2 Individual Responses ........................................................................................ 2-13 2.2.1 Responses to Comments from Agencies .............................................. 2-13 2.2.2 Responses to Comments from Tribal Entities and Members .............. 2-118 2.2.3 Responses to Comments from Organizations and Individuals ........... 2-193 Letters P1-P26 ..................................................................................... 2-194 Volume 2 Letters P27-P45 ................................................................................... 2-507 Chapter 3, Revisions to the Draft EIR .................................................................................3-1 3.1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................3-1 3.2 Text Changes to the Draft EIR .............................................................................3-1 3.2.1 Executive Summary ..................................................................................3-1 3.2.2 Chapter 1, Introduction .............................................................................3-2 3.2.3 Chapter 2, Description of Project and Alternatives ...................................3-2 3.2.4 Chapter 3, Environmental Analysis ...........................................................3-3 3.2.5 Chapter 5, Report Preparation ............................................................... 3-26 Fountain Wind Project i ESA / 170788.00 Final Environmental Impact Report April 2021 Table of Contents Page Appendices (provided on included USB device) A. Supplemental Information and Technical Studies ..........................................................A-1 A1. Stantec: Project Description Refinements .............................................................A1-1 A2. Stantec: Biological Resources - Extended Survey Areas ......................................A2-1 A3. Environmental Design & Research: Shadow Flicker Analysis ...............................A3-1 A4. Stantec: Visual Resources Technical Report .........................................................A4-1 A5. West: eDNA Foothill Yellow-legged Frog Report ...................................................A5-1 A6. Capitol Airspace Group: The Moose Camp Helipad ..............................................A6-1 B. Public Notices ................................................................................................................B-1 C. Letters Received Outside the Scope of CEQA.............................................................. C-1 D. Letter Exhibits ............................................................................................................... D-1 D1. Exhibit to Letter T2, Tony Yiamkis ........................................................................ D1-1 D2. Exhibits to Letter P20, Steven L. Johnson ............................................................ D2-1 D3. Exhibits to Letter P21, Beth Messick .................................................................... D3-1 D4. Exhibits to Letter P27, Margaret Osa ................................................................... D4-1 D5. Exhibits to Letter P45, Kelly Tanner ..................................................................... D5-1 E. Responses to Confidential Letter ..................................................................................E-1 F. Recipients of the Final EIR ............................................................................................ F-1 G. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ............................................................... G-1 H. Figures .......................................................................................................................... H-1 Tables Table 1-1 Comparison of Turbine Options ....................................................................... 1-7 Table 2 1 Commenting Parties ......................................................................................... 2-4 The Draft EIR for the Project is provided on the USB device enclosed with printed versions of this Final EIR. It also is available on the County’s website: https://www.co.shasta.ca.us/index/drm/planning/eir/fountain-wind-project. Fountain Wind Project ii ESA / 170788.00 Final Environmental Impact Report April 2021 CHAPTER 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose This Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is an informational document that discloses the potential environmental impacts of the Fountain Wind Project (Project). The Shasta County (County) Department of Resource Management, Planning Division, as the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),1 has prepared this EIR to document its analysis of the potential direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of the Project. The County will use this EIR, in conjunction with other information developed in the County’s formal record, when considering whether to certify the EIR and whether to approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove Use Permit (UP 16-007), which has been requested to authorize the construction, operation and maintenance, and ultimately the decommissioning of the Project. This Final EIR consists of the Draft EIR published August 3, 2020, together with the analysis of Applicant-proposed changes to the Project (which changes are analyzed in this Chapter 1), responses to comments provided in Chapter 2, revisions to the Draft EIR identified in Chapter 3, and additional or updated technical information that has become available since circulation of the Draft EIR. This Final EIR includes seven appendices: Appendix A contains supplemental information and technical studies, including Applicant-proposed refinements to the Project Description that have been submitted since the Draft EIR was issued (Appendix A1), a biological resources survey report for extended survey areas extended (Appendix A2), an updated shadow flicker analysis that considers the proposed design refinements (Appendix A3), an updated visual resources technical report that removes the word “draft” and includes larger-format simulations as compared to the version that was included as an appendix to the Draft EIR (Appendix A4), the eDNA Foothill Yellow-legged Frog Report that inadvertently was omitted from appendices to the Draft EIR (Appendix A5), and technical input provided regarding the Moose Camp Helipad (Appendix A6). Appendix B contains copies of public notices issued in connection with the Draft EIR. 1 This analysis is being prepared CEQA (Pub. Res. Code §21000 et seq.) and its implementing regulations, the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. §15000 et seq.). Fountain Wind Project 1-1 ESA / 170788.00 Final Environmental Impact Report April 2021 1. Introduction Appendix C contains copies of letters received that were not included in Chapter 2, Responses to Comments, because the contents do not require a response for the reasons described in Section 2.1.1 of this Final EIR. Appendix D contains exhibits provided with comment letters that, due to their volume, are being provided separately. Appendix E contains a confidential appendix that will be available to decision-makers but otherwise is being protected from public disclosure at the request of the Pit River Tribe. Appendix F contains a list of the recipients
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Volcanic Legacy
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacifi c Southwest Region VOLCANIC LEGACY March 2012 SCENIC BYWAY ALL AMERICAN ROAD Interpretive Plan For portions through Lassen National Forest, Lassen Volcanic National Park, Klamath Basin National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Tule Lake, Lava Beds National Monument and World War II Valor in the Pacific National Monument 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................4 Background Information ........................................................................................................................4 Management Opportunities ....................................................................................................................5 Planning Assumptions .............................................................................................................................6 BYWAY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................7 Management Goals ..................................................................................................................................7 Management Objectives ..........................................................................................................................7 Visitor Experience Goals ........................................................................................................................7 Visitor
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 PARTICIPATING NONPROFITS Shasta County Nonprofits
    2020 PARTICIPATING NONPROFITS Shasta County Nonprofits ACEs Hope & Active 20-30 Club of Alano Club of All Saints' Episcopal Resilience Fund of Redding Foundation Redding Church, Redding Shasta County Animal Welfare Another Chance Anderson Historical Endowment Fund of Animal Welfare Camp McCumber Society CFNS League CareNet Pregnancy Center for Spiritual Caring Choices Catalyst Mentoring Center of N. CA Living Community Arts Community Children's Legacy CHYBA Endowment Fund of Foundation of the Center CFNS North State Economic Community Compass Development Empire Recovery Scholarship ShiningCare Corporation of Center Endowment of CFNS Shasta County Enterprise High Exodus Farms Fall River Valley School Music Faithworks Ministry Library Boosters Family Dynamics Fort Crook Historical Forward Redding Friends of Schreder Resource Center Society Foundation Planetarium Friends of the Friends of the Good News Rescue Intermountain Shasta County Girls Inc. Mission Library Libraries Haven Humane Hill Country Horsetown Clear Hope City Redding Society Community Clinic Creek Preserve Indian Cultural Junction Educational KFOI Kids Turn Organization Foundation Kiwanis Club of Lakehead Volunteer Shasta Dam KIXE KKRN Radio Fire Department Foundation Living Hope Lassen Park LaunchPad 4 Kids Leadership Redding Compassion Foundation Ministries Lutheran Social Local Indians for Luis Miramontes Services of Northern Make A Wish Education Foundation California McArthur Burney Michael James Mayers Healthcare Falls Interpretive Mangas Endowment Mosaic Ministries
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Redding and Shasta Cascade Find Any Adventure, Any Day
    Introducing Redding and Shasta Cascade Find Any Adventure, Any Day Endless Adventure Awaits! The majestic region of northeastern California, abundantly scattered with lakes, rivers, mountains and historic mining towns offers travelers unforgettable fun and adventure. Only two hours north of Sacramento and three hours northeast of San Francisco, Shasta Cascade’s bustling hub city of Redding is just the starting point for journeys into one of America’s most spectacular and pristine regional destinations. Boasting 300+ days of beautiful weather a year, this area offers boundless outdoor recreation with magnificent landscapes and breathtaking vistas. From towering volcanoes, alpine ranges, and glaciers, to waterfalls, lush forests, pristine lakes, and roaring rivers, this travel destination is one of a kind. Called the “Gem of the U.S. Trails System” by the San Francisco Chronicle, with more than 200 miles of hiking, biking, ATV, and equestrian trails all within a 15-mile radius of the city center, Redding is an outdoor adventurer’s dream. And with an abundance of nearby lakes, rivers, and streams, year-round kayaking, paddle boarding, boating, and fishing are available here. The Sacramento River runs through town, so is it any surprise that Forbes Magazine listed Redding among North America's Top Ten Fly-fishing Towns? Not for us. In addition to the trails and the waters, California’s Shasta Cascade contains seven national forests, eight national and state parks, and several mountain ranges, including the Trinity Alps, the northern Sierra Nevada, and the California Cascade range. The Shasta Cascade also boasts two massive glaciated volcanoes: the dormant 14,179 foot Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Lassen Volcanic National Park Visitor Study
    U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Social Science Program Visitor Services Project Lassen Volcanic National Park Visitor Study [Insert image here] OMB Control Number:1024-0224 Current Expiration Date: 8/31/2014 2 Lassen Volcanic National Park Visitor Study United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Lassen Volcanic National Park P.O. Box 100 Mineral, CA 96063 IN REPLY REFER TO: January/June 2012 Dear Visitor: Thank you for participating in this study. Our goal is to learn about the expectations, opinions, and interests of visitors to Lassen Volcanic National Park. This information will assist us in our efforts to better manage this park and to serve you. This questionnaire is only being given to a select number of visitors, so your participation is very important! It should only take about 20 minutes to complete. Please complete this questionnaire. Seal it in and return it to us in the postage paid envelope provided. If you have any questions, please contact Margaret Littlejohn, NPS VSP Director, Park Studies Unit, College of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 441139, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844-1139, phone: 208-885-7863, email: [email protected]. We appreciate your help. Sincerely, Darlene M. Koontz Superintendent Lassen Volcanic National Park Visitor Study 3 DIRECTIONS At the end of your visit: 1. Please have the selected individual (at least 16 years old) complete this questionnaire. 2. Answer the questions carefully since each question is different. 3. For questions that use circles (O), please mark your answer by filling in the circle with black or blue ink.
    [Show full text]
  • June 6, 2011 the Honorable Barbara Boxer United States Senate 112
    Rails-to-Trails Conservancy Safe Routes to School International Mountain American Trails California Bicycling Coalition 235 Montgomery St., Suite 769 National Partnership Bicycling Association P.O. Box 491797 1017 L Street, #288 San Francisco, CA 94104 PO Box 663 California Office Redding, CA 96049-1797 Sacramento, CA 95814 415.814.1101 Fairfax, CA 94978 Sacramento, CA 530.547.2060 916.446.7558 www.railstotrails.org 415.454.7430 916.441.6035 www.americantrails.org www.calbike.org saferoutespartnership.org www. imba.com June 6, 2011 The Honorable Barbara Boxer United States Senate 112 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Dear Senator Boxer, We, the undersigned California organizations, greatly appreciate your remarks from your May 25, 2011 press conference indicating that there will be dedicated funding for bicycling and walking in the transportation bill. We ask that you deliver on that promise by preserving the Transportation Enhancements, Safe Routes to School and Recreational Trails programs. Funding for bicycling and walking currently represents only about 1.5% of all federal transportation funding, but bicycling and walking represent 12% of all transportation trips. We are very concerned about the fate of these programs as Congressman John Mica, Chair of the House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee, has publicly stated that his transportation bill will make funding for bicycling and walking optional. Without dedicated funding, critical federal funding for bicycling and pedestrian facilities and projects will be decimated. Prior to 1992, bicycling and walking projects were eligible for federal transportation funding but had no dedicated funds. All states combined spent just $2 million per year on these projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Fountain Wind Project, Final Environmental Impact Report (April 2021)
    Shasta County Department of Resource Management Planning Division FOUNTAIN WIND PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT – VOLUME 1 April 2021 Use Permit No. UP 16-007 State Clearinghouse No. 2019012029 Prepared for: Department of Resource Management Planning Division Prepared by: Environmental Science Associates Shasta County Department of Resource Management Planning Division FOUNTAIN WIND PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT – VOLUME 1 April 2021 Use Permit No. UP 16-007 State Clearinghouse No. 2019012029 Prepared for: Shasta County Department of Resource Management, Planning Division Prepared by: Environmental Science Associates TABLE OF CONTENTS Fountain Wind Project Final Environmental Impact Report Page Volume 1 Chapter 1, Introduction ........................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Project Overview ..................................................................................................1-2 1.2.1 Project Site ................................................................................................1-2 1.2.2 Project Summary .......................................................................................1-3 1.2.3 Changes to the Project Since Issuance of the Draft EIR ..........................1-3 1.3 Agency and Public Involvement ........................................................................ 1-23 1.3.1 Agency
    [Show full text]
  • Redding Open for Business Following Wildfires
    REDDING OPEN FOR BUSINESS FOLLOWING WILDFIRES Shasta Cascade’s Hub City Ready to Welcome Back Visitors REDDING, Calif. (Oct. 10, 2018) – Centrally located in the Shasta Cascade region of Northern California, the city of Redding provides travelers with the ideal hub to explore the area’s unparalleled natural offerings. Despite the state’s well-publicized wildfire conditions, Redding’s numerous options for lodging, dining, retail and leisure are all fully operational following successful containment efforts by firefighters and other first responders. As a result of the containment, air and water quality in the region are both deemed completely suitable and healthy. The Carr Fire was declared 100 percent contained on August 30, and the Delta Fire is now 100 percent contained, enabling travelers to safely explore the area’s 50 waterfalls, historic mining towns, national forests, state parks and more. A sampling of area attractions includes: • McArthur-Burney Falls Memorial State Park • Castle Crags State Park • Turtle Bay Exploration Park • Lake Shasta Caverns National Natural Landmark • Lassen Volcanic National Park • Lava Beds National Monument • The Sundial Bridge About Redding, CA Situated at the northern end of the Sacramento River Valley, Redding is the hub city in Shasta Cascade and is located just two hours north of Sacramento and three hours northeast of San Francisco. Averaging 300+ days of beautiful weather a year, Redding offers outdoor adventure and attractions for every age, along with great wine, food, sporting and cultural events, dining, lodging and entertainment. The great Sacramento River runs through the center of town, helping earn Redding the fame of being America’s great kayaking destinations.
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanic Legacy Scenic Byway All-American Road
    Volcanic Legacy Scenic Byway All-American Road Corridor Management Plan Update For Oregon and California December 2018 Cover Photo: View of Lassen Peak and Manzanita Lake in Lassen Volcanic National Park Ahjumawi Lava Springs State Park, California Come experience America’s Volcanic Legacy Explore the wonder and beauty of a dramatic volcanic landscape, from Crater Lake in Oregon to Lassen Peak in California. You’ll encounter the ancient natural forces that shaped exquisite mountain lakes and snow-capped peaks all throughout this “volcano to volcano” driving adventure. Along with spectacular scenery, you’ll enjoy legendary history, charming towns, and extraordinary recreational and cultural opportunities. A once-in-a- lifetime experience awaits you along the 500-mile Volcanic Legacy Scenic Byway. Ahjumawi Lava Springs i ii Table of Contents Acronym List ......................................................................................................................................................... vii Introduction: ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of the Corridor Management Plan (CMP) Update ............................................................... 1 How the Byway Came to Be…A Brief History .......................................................................................... 2 Bringing the Byway Together and Moving Ahead ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Northern California Road Trip
    Siskiyou County Humboldt County Northern California Shasta Redding Cascade Road Trip Shasta Cascade The Shasta Cascade region is truly the land of milk and honey, with fresh and tasty local products available throughout the region including almonds and lavender. • Butte County is home to numerous multi-generational ranches, including Sohnrey Family Foods, B. Maisie Jane’s, Lundberg Farms and Rancho Llano Seco – a sixth-generation family run farm in Chico, and one of the last intact Mexican land grant properties from 1845. • 29 Rows Lavender Farm in Anderson o!ers lavender bundles, body balms, sachets and paw spa products. It strives to build a community connection through wellness and local events. • Lassen Volcanic National Park is a hiker’s paradise. It is the only place on earth where all four types of volcanoes are found in such a small concentrated area. Siskiyou County Redding Humboldt County Siskiyou is home to Mt. Shasta, Redding is a great home base Entering northern Humboldt County a draw to climbers and those for visitors planning a houseboat on Hwy 299, the scenic drive seeking spiritual and physical vacation on the pristine Shasta Lake traverses the mountains and o!ers wellness, as well as volcanoes, or seeking outdoor adventure in breathtaking vistas as it follows national forests, wildlife refuges and Shasta-Trinity National Forest. along the sparkling Trinity River dozens of waterfalls. and passes through the Six Rivers Shasta Lake features 365 miles • National Forest. • The Volcanic Legacy Scenic of shoreline; visitors can dock Byway features unique a houseboat in a di!erent cove • The tiny town of Willow Creek geological formations including every day of the year and not is home to the world-famous four di!erent volcanoes, spend the night in the same Bigfoot Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparing for the Future
    PREPARING FOR THE FUTURE A Transition Handbook for Success Butte County SELPA WorkAbility 1 Program Revised 2021 Table of Contents Congratulations Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. Page 4 Personal Recordkeeping……………………………………………………………………………. Page 5-6 Local Resources…………………………………………………………………………………………. Pages 7-15 Department of Rehabilitation………………………………………………………… Page 7 One-Stop Centers…………………………………………………………………………… Page 8 Alliance for Workforce Development…………………………………………….. Page 9 Independent Living Services of Northern California ……………………… Page 10 National Guard Youth ChalleNGe …………………………………………………. Page 11 California Job Corps ……………………………………………………………………… Page 12 CA Conservation Corps (CCC) ………………………………………………………… Page 13 Far Northern Regional Center ………………………………..…………………….. Page 14 Pride Industries…………..…………………………………………………………………. Page 15 College Info/Resources……………………………………………………………………………… Page 16-19 Community Colleges ……….……………………………………………………………. Page 17 State Universities …………………………………………..…………………………….. Page 18 Private Universities ….…………………………………………………………………… Page 19 Employment Tips………………………………………………………………………………………. Page 20-29 Picking up and Filling out the Application………………………………………. Page 20 Resume…………..……………………………………………………………………………… Page 21 Before the Interview………………………………………………………………………. Page 22 How to Dress for an Interview (male)……………………………………………… Page 23 How to Dress for an Interview (female)………………………………………….. Page 24 Quick Review-Interview Tips…………………………………………………………… Page 25 2 At the Interview………………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior National Park Service
    NFS Form 10-900a OMB No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section ___ Page __ SUPPLEMENTARY LISTING RECORD NRIS Reference Number: 06000525 Date Listed: 6/23/2006 Manzanita Lake Naturalist 7 s Services Historic District Shasta CA Property Name County State Lassen Volcanic National Park MPS Multiple Name This property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places in accordance with the attached nomination documentation subject to the following exceptions, exclusions, or amendments, notwithstanding the National Park Service certification included in the nomination documentation. Signature at the Keeper Date of Action --__ — ___=^ _ =z_ _ _ ________________________________________ Amended Tterns in Nomination: Historic Function: The functions are amended to read: Domestic/Institutional Housing; Education/Research facility; and Recreation/Museum, Outdoor Recreation. These clarifications were confirmed with the NFS FPO office DISTRIBUTION: National Register property file Nominating Authority (without nomination attachment) NPS Form 10-900 OMBNo. 1024-0018 (Rev 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM 1. Name of Property historic name: Manzanita Lake Naturalist's Services Historic District other name/site number: 2. Location street & number: 39489 Highway 44 not for publication, n/a vicinity: Northwest Entrance, Lassen Volcanic National Park city/town: Shingletown state: California code: CA county: Shasta code: 089 zip code: 96088 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN and ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Lassen Volcanic National Park August, 2000
    DRAFT GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Lassen Volcanic National Park August, 2000 This document presents a proposed plan and three alternatives for the management and use of Lassen Volcanic National Park over the next 15 years. Alternative A: No Action, assumes that physical facilities would remain largely unchanged and that staffing and operational funding would remain constant over the planning period. Alternative B: Resource Preservation & Basic Visitor Service, provides a program for preserving, and where necessary, restoring significant park resources. It includes significant staffing and funding increases for the park’s resource management functions, restores key elements of the park’s infrastructure, provides for restoration of several specific sites with natural system conflicts, establishes a standards-based management zoning system, and proposes designation of approximately 25,000 acres as part of the National Wilderness System. The plan also includes program increases and visitor facility improvements to provide for quality basic visitor service. Alternative C: Resource Protection and Enhanced Visitor Experience. This alternative is the proposed General Management Plan for Lassen Volcanic National Park. It includes all the features of Alternative B, and provides enhancement to visitor experience by making more facilities available during winter months, and increasing interpretive services, facilities, and information. Alternative D: Resource Protection and Expanded Visitor Opportunities, includes all of the features of Alternative C and in addition, provides for expansion of family and group campgrounds at several locations. It also expands winter access at the north entrance by plowing the park road an additional nine miles to the Devastated Area, and keeping one loop of the campground open for winter camping.
    [Show full text]