Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Level 1 SFRA - Final Report August 2008 Volume I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Level 1 SFRA - Final Report August 2008 Volume I South Somerset District Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Level 1 SFRA - Final Report August 2008 Volume I Halcrow Group Limited South Somerset District Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Level 1 SFRA - Final Report August 2008 Volume I Halcrow Group Limited Halcrow Group Limited Burderop Park, Swindon, Wiltshire, SN4 0QD Tel +44 (0)1793 812479 Fax +44 (0)1793 812089 www.halcrow.com Halcrow Group Limited has prepared this report in accordance with the brief from South Somerset District Council, for their sole and specific use. Any other persons who use any information contained herein do so at their own risk. © Halcrow Group Limited 2008 Halcrow Group Limited Burderop Park, Swindon, Wiltshire, SN4 0QD Tel +44 (0)1793 812479 Fax +44 (0)1793 812089 www.halcrow.com South Somerset District Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Level 1 SFRA - Final Report Contents Amendment Record This report has been issued and amended as follows: Issue Revision Description Date Signed 1 0 Final report - draft 29 February 2008 D Kensett 2 1 Final report– draft 22 May 2008 A Corner 3 2 Final report - draft 11 July 2008 A McConkey 4 3 Final report 27 August 2008 M Barker P Crozier D Wilson PS Rayner Halcrow Group Limited Burderop Park, Swindon, Wiltshire, SN4 0QD Tel +44 (0)1793 812479 Fax +44 (0)1793 812089 www.halcrow.com South Somerset District Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Table of Contents Executive Summary (separate document) Abbreviations 1 Introduction.................................................................................................... 1 2 The South Somerset SFRA Area .................................................................. 2 2.1 Overview....................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 South Somerset .............................................................................................................. 2 2.3 South Somerset Rivers..................................................................................................... 3 2.4 Flood Risks.................................................................................................................... 4 2.5 Geology ........................................................................................................................ 4 3 SFRA Approach & Methodology .................................................................. 6 3.1 Overview....................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Purpose of this SFRA...................................................................................................... 6 3.3 Outcomes of the SFRA Process........................................................................................ 6 3.4 The Sequential Test......................................................................................................... 8 3.5 The Exception Test ........................................................................................................ 8 3.6 Planning response matrix............................................................................................... 10 3.7 Level 1 SFRA methodology ........................................................................................... 10 3.8 The need for Level 2 SFRA............................................................................................ 11 3.9 SFRA User Guide......................................................................................................... 12 4 Planning policy framework......................................................................... 14 4.1 Overview..................................................................................................................... 14 4.2 Planning Policy Framework............................................................................................ 14 4.3 National Planning Policy................................................................................................ 14 4.4 Regional Planning Policy................................................................................................ 16 4.5 Local planning policy .................................................................................................... 18 4.6 Summary ..................................................................................................................... 18 5 Data sources................................................................................................ 19 5.1 Overview..................................................................................................................... 19 5.2 Consultation process..................................................................................................... 19 5.3 Environment Agency Flood Zone maps .......................................................................... 20 5.4 Detailed hydraulic modelling .......................................................................................... 20 5.5 Localised flooding......................................................................................................... 20 6 Assessment of potential causes of flooding............................................. 21 6.1 Overview..................................................................................................................... 21 6.2 Sources of flooding....................................................................................................... 21 6.3 Probability of flooding................................................................................................... 21 6.4 SFRA flood maps ......................................................................................................... 22 6.5 River flooding – fluvial .................................................................................................. 23 6.6 Groundwater flooding................................................................................................... 27 6.7 Surface water flooding - land drainage ............................................................................. 32 6.8 Sewer flooding ............................................................................................................. 33 6.9 Reservoirs.................................................................................................................... 36 6.10 Other artificial water retaining structures.......................................................................... 38 6.11 Critical services/infrastructure within Flood Zones ........................................................... 38 South Somerset District Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment 7 Assessment of flood risk management practices .................................... 39 7.1 Overview..................................................................................................................... 39 7.2 Flood risk management responsibilities............................................................................ 39 7.3 Existing flood defences ................................................................................................. 39 7.4 Flood warning areas ...................................................................................................... 43 8 Assessment of the capacity for the use of SUDS..................................... 45 8.1 Overview..................................................................................................................... 45 8.2 Types of SUDS systems................................................................................................. 46 8.3 SUDS at the planning stage ............................................................................................ 46 8.4 Application of SUDS within South Somerset.................................................................... 46 8.5 Effective application of SUDS techniques ........................................................................ 48 8.6 Constraints on discharges to ground................................................................................ 48 8.7 The role of groundwater & aquifer bodies in sustainable drainage........................................ 48 9 Flood risk & climate change....................................................................... 50 9.1 Overview..................................................................................................................... 50 9.2 Flood risk & climate change ........................................................................................... 50 9.3 Integrated urban drainage .............................................................................................. 51 9.4 Potential increase in flood risk caused by future development ............................................. 51 10 Strategic Land-Use Planning...................................................................... 53 10.1 Overview..................................................................................................................... 53 10.2 Flood risk management policy ........................................................................................ 53 10.3 Strategic flood risk management studies........................................................................... 53 10.4 Growth areas for development ....................................................................................... 57 10.5 Policy recommendations...............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Somerset's Common Works Programme 2015/16
    Somerset's Common Works Programme 2015/16 - Q3 Progress The Common Works Programme shows the flood risk and water management works Somerset's Flood Risk Management Authorities are doing, funded from their own budgets. The last section, labelled joint, is for projects that are joint funded, including those that SRA funds are contributing to Flood Risk For removed For removed Project Management Timescale for schemes - schemes - Ref Project Name District Parish Description Flood Risk Source Progress Comments/Issues Stage Authority Implementation Reason for Further (Funder) removal Action 1. Improvement Schemes - Environment Agency Joint Programme of Work attracting either Government Grant in Aid or Local Levy (WRFCC) funding (see map for EA schemes) www.somersetriversauthority.org.uk/about-us/board-and-partners/board-meetings-and-papers/?entryid108=97703 Carry out repairs to defence wall and reinstate flood bank to Initial site visit has taken place. EA 1 Brue Glastonbury to Cripps Mendip Wedmore Design EA Main River 2015-16 defence level G = on course for delivery in 15/16 Works are ongoing Picked up on IDB Enhanced EA 1 Brue Glastonbury to Cripps Mendip Wedmore Desilt and pull banks on River Brue EA Main River 2015-16 R = no longer proposed for delivery in 15/16 by maintenance EA programme None Lewis Drove Tilting Weir - Gate major mechanical maintenance, This work is being carried out by EA 2 North Drain Mendip Burtle EA Main River 2015-16 repair motor and gearbox G = on course for delivery in 15/16 MEICA Funding for EA 3 Burnham - Highbridge
    [Show full text]
  • Our Castle, Our Town
    Our Castle, Our Town An n 2011 BACAS took part in a community project undertaken by Castle Cary investigation Museum with the purpose of exploring a selection of historic sites in and around into the the town of Castle Cary. archaeology of I Castle Cary's Using a number of non intrusive surveying methods including geophysical survey Castle site and aerial photography, the aim of the project was to develop the interpretation of some of the town’s historic sites, including the town’s castle site. A geophysical Matthew survey was undertaken at three sites, including the Castle site, the later manorial Charlton site, and a small survey 2 km south west of Castle Cary, at Dimmer. The focus of the article will be the main castle site centred in the town (see Figure 1) which will provide a brief history of the site, followed by the results of the survey and subsequent interpretation. Location and Topography Castle Cary is a small town in south east Somerset, lying within the Jurassic belt of geology, approximately at the junction of the upper lias and the inferior and upper oolites. Building stone is plentiful, and is orange to yellow in colour. This is the source of the River Cary, which now runs to the Bristol Channel via King’s Sedgemoor Drain and the River Parrett, but prior to 1793 petered out within Sedgemoor. The site occupies a natural spur formed by two conjoining, irregularly shaped mounds extending from the north east to the south west. The ground gradually rises to the north and, more steeply, to the east, and falls away to the south.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 6: MEDIEVAL ROAD & DONYATT
    DIRECTIONS: The Old Medieval Road - Donyatt to Ilminster 1. The walk starts at the beginning of Canal Way, opposite Wharf Lane Car Park. Follow the footpath The old Donyatt to Ilminster road started in Church beside the recreation ground down to where it enters a Street, Donyatt, passing via Down and Dunpole Farms side path at the entrance to the additional playing area. crossing the southern slopes and shoulder of Herne Hill and then down to the Cross (the area of the Royal 2. Turn left into the playing field and follow the hedge, Oak in Ilminster). This was a convenient way to keeping it on your left, up the field and the Incline to the Ilminster and perhaps the shortest distance from the top of the field. Go on to the track straight ahead and centre of the village. It is likely to have been a better continue to the kissing gate. drained road and less muddy in winter than the lower No. 6: MEDIEVAL ROAD & DONYATT 3. Cross the field diagonally right and go through a route via Sea. This road was probably used for taking rambler gate three quarters of the way along the far pottery to Ilminster market using the Stibbear/Crow hedge line. Turn right and continue up tot he corner of Lane route. The road was also used as an access to the the field, keeping the hedge on your right. Go through a field systems on the southern slopes of Herne Hill rambler gate on to the Medieval Road. which were used by the local inhabitants.
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset Woodland Strategy
    A Woodland Strategy for Somerset 2010 A Woodland Strategy for Somerset 2010 Contents ©ENP Introducing the Strategy 2 Mendip 20 Table of Contents 2 Sedgemoor 21 Woodland Strategy Overview 4 Taunton Deane 22 Benefits of a Somerset Woodland Strategy 4 West Somerset 23 VISION STATEMENT 5 Sensitive Landscape Areas 24 Analysis of Somerset’s Woodland Resource 6 Culture and Heritage 25 Somerset’s Woodland Resource 6 Cultural issues related to woodlands 25 Woodland distribution 6 Links with our history and a source of inspiration 25 Area of woodland 7 Ecosystem Services provided by trees and woodland 25 Woodland size 8 Recreation and access 26 Woodland species 8 The need for public access 26 Coniferous woodland 9 Accessible woodlands in Somerset 27 Hedgerow and parkland trees 10 Case Study - “The Neroche Forect Project” 28 Other elements of the woodland resource 10 Archaeology and the Historic Landscape 29 Nature Conservation 11 Historic woodland cover 29 SSSI Woodland 11 Ancient woodland 29 Importance of the designated areas 11 Ownership of ancient woodlands 30 Key woodland biodiversity types 12 Sensitive Management of Archaeological Features 31 Local Wildlife Sites 14 Case Study - “Exmoor National Park, Ancient Woodland Project” 32 Woodland wildlife of European importance 14 Historic value of hedgerow trees 33 Management for biodiversity 15 Historic landscape policy 33 Veteran Trees 16 Woodland Ownership 34 Landscape Assessment 18 Why people own Woodlands 34 Somerset Character Areas 18 Woodland ownership by Conservation bodies 35 Woodland in
    [Show full text]
  • Ilton Parish Council
    ILTON PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of Ilton Parish Council held in Merryfield Hall on Tuesday 9th July 2019 2019/122 Attendance and Apologies Those present: Apologies In Attendance Mr I Sherwood (Chair) Mr G Fox 12 members of the Mrs R Burt (Vice Chair) Mrs S Hill public Mrs M Bullock Mrs P Matravers Mrs J Easterbrook Mr I Welch Ms H Wakeford Mr A Dance (County Mr M Cavill (District Councillor) Councillor) Mrs S Morley (Clerk) 2019/123 Visitors and Public Voice (a) Development behind St Peter's Close A resident commented that every winter Rod Lane floods and if the surface run off area is reduced by building it will make matters worse. It was felt that the developers need to ensure there are sufficient land drains installed. Another resident brought up the issue of the prior discussion that the parish council had with the developer and the view expressed by the parish council that there is a need for low cost housing in the village. The resident commented that Ilton already has a disproportionate amount of low cost housing and it needs more higher banded properties to ensure it receives sufficient council tax which would also give Ilton a louder voice. Another resident commented that the low cost housing which is included in the new development on the edge of the playing field is not selling, some bungalows remain on the market for a long time and that Ilton does not need more low cost housing. The resident asked why the parish council felt that the village needs more low cost housing and where is the evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Parish Council (PC) Meeting Held As a Consultative Virtual Meeting Via Zoom Software on Wednesday 28Th October 2020 at 7.00Pm
    North Cadbury & Yarlington Parish Council Clerk: Mrs Rebecca Carter, Portman House, North Barrow, Somerset, BA22 7LZ Tel: 01963 240226 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.northcadbury.org.uk “Draft” Minutes of Parish Council (PC) Meeting held as a consultative virtual meeting via Zoom software on Wednesday 28th October 2020 at 7.00pm Councillors Present (remotely): Malcolm Hunt (Chairman) Alan Bartlett (Vice Chairman) Sue Gilbert Karen Harris Roger House Andy Keys-Toyer Bryan Mead Archie Montgomery Alan Rickers John Rundle Katherine Vaughan In Attendance (remotely): C.Cllr M Lewis, D.Cllr H Hobhouse, D.Cllr Kevin Messenger, the Clerk, Mr A Tregay, Boon Brown and nineteen members of the public. Public Session There were no comments from the public. Clare Field, Ridgeway Lane, North Cadbury – Presentation of Initial Plans for Development Presentation by Mr A Tregay, Boon Brown to PC of initial conceptual plans on scheme at Ridgeway Lane prior to formal consultation with PC, neighbours/residents. The Chairman informed residents that the presentation by Mr Tregay would not constitute a formal consultation. Mr Tregay had given his assurance to the Chairman that the PC and neighbours/residents would have the opportunity to comment and ask questions during the formal consultation process at pre- application and post-application stages, which would be held at a later date, which was also confirmed by Mr Tregay. Mr Tregay stated that this was the start of a constructive dialogue with the PC in order to give an indication of the proposed development during the early stages and to hopefully receive feedback. The aim was to keep the PC and neighbours informed as much as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • North Cadbury Neighbourhood Plan Heritage Assessment on Behalf of North Cadbury and Yarlington Parish Council August 2020
    North Cadbury Neighbourhood Plan Heritage Assessment on behalf of North Cadbury and Yarlington Parish Council August 2020 kim sankey │ architect angel architecture │ design │ interiors Angel Architecture Ltd Registered in England at Unit 4, Herringston Barn, Herringston, Dorchester, Dorset DT2 9PU _____________________________________________________________________ North Cadbury Neighbourhood Plan Heritage Assessment August 2020 NORTH CADBURY Key Features The special interest of North Cadbury lies in its origins as a rural estate village (formerly Cadbury Estate) of mixed farmland demarked by ancient enclosed hedgerows with some C17 and C18 modification. On the edges are C19 historic orchards, bounded by mature hedgerows, and several farmsteads. The orchards are a particularly strong landscape feature in terms of social history and culture as they represented an intensively productive use of land, providing cider for the labouring classes while also allowing the grazing of sheep and poultry. There are many listed buildings but most prominent are the Church and Cadbury Court at the historic core around which development is concentrated. The southern edge of the Conservation Area is characterised by the parkland setting of the Court. Under the ownership of Sir Archibald & Lady Langman the estate introduced scientific methods of farming in the 1930’s. The Langman’s prosperity, as a result of this innovation, is evident in the provision of the new village hall opposite Glebe House on Woolston Road. Although most of the other farms have been converted to residential use, Manor Farm remains the manufacturing base for renowned Montgomery Cheddar and Ogleshield cheeses. The River Cam, which rises in Yarlington, runs along the western edge of North Cadbury and through Brookhampton.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Report and Project Plan
    North Cadbury and Yarlington Neighbourhood Plan Initial Scoping Report and Project Plan SCOPING REPORT – INITIAL FILE NOTE Prepared on behalf of North Cadbury and Yarlington Parish Council SEPTEMBER 2019 1. INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared by Jo Witherden BSc(Hons) DipTP DipUD MRTPI of Dorset Planning Consultant Ltd, for North Cadbury and Yarlington Parish Council. The Parish Council is the qualifying body authorised to act in preparing a neighbourhood development plan in relation to the North Cadbury and Yarlington Neighbourhood Plan area. The purpose of this report is to identify at an early stage what issues that relate to development are likely to be most important to the community, and are something that the Neighbourhood Plan can potentially influence. This will then guide the early stages of evidence gathering and consultation, and initial project plan, to ensure that the time and resources spent on preparing the Neighbourhood Plan are focused on achieving the desired outcomes. NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANS A Neighbourhood Plan, when made, becomes part of the development plan for the area, alongside the Local Plan. Together they set out the policies that are used to decide what types of building work or other development will generally be allowed, and what should be refused. They can also say what buildings or places should be protected, and why. Having a Neighbourhood Plan won’t change the area overnight. Its key influence is on decisions made by on planning applications. Landowners (or developers) will still need to make planning applications to the District Council, who will consult on these before making a decision to permit or refuse the proposed development.
    [Show full text]
  • Langport and Frog Lane
    English Heritage Extensive Urban Survey An archaeological assessment of Langport and Frog Lane Miranda Richardson Jane Murray Corporate Director Culture and Heritage Directorate Somerset County Council County Hall TAUNTON Somerset TA1 4DY 2003 SOMERSET EXTENSIVE URBAN SURVEY LANGPORT AND FROG LANE ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT by Miranda Richardson CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................... .................................. 3 II. MAJOR SOURCES ............................... ................................... 3 1. Primary documents ............................ ................................ 3 2. Local histories .............................. .................................. 3 3. Maps ......................................... ............................... 3 III. A BRIEF HISTORY OF LANGPORT . .................................. 3 IV. THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF LANGPORT . .............................. 4 1. PREHISTORIC and ROMAN ........................ ............................ 4 2. SAXON ........................................ .............................. 7 3. MEDIEVAL ..................................... ............................. 9 4. POST-MEDIEVAL ................................ ........................... 14 5. INDUSTRIAL (LATE 18TH AND 19TH CENTURY) . .......................... 15 6. 20TH CENTURY ................................. ............................ 18 V. THE POTENTIAL OF LANGPORT . ............................... 19 1. Research interests........................... .................................
    [Show full text]
  • Flooding in the Somerset Levels, 2014 by Christina Mann
    GEOACTIVE 549 Flooding in the Somerset Levels, 2014 By Christina Mann A case study about the Relevance to specifications causes, impacts and Exam Link to specification management of flooding board on the Somerset Levels AQA A Unit 1: Physical Geography, Section B, Water on the land, page 13 For a period of three months from http://filestore.aqa.org.uk/subjects/AQA-9030-W-SP-14. December 2013 to February 2014, PDF the Somerset Levels hit the national AQA B Unit 1: Managing Places in the 21st century, The coastal headlines as the area suffered from environment, pages 8–10 http://filestore.aqa.org.uk/subjects/AQA-9035-W-SP-14. extensive flooding. At the height of PDF 2 the winter floods, 65 km of land on Edexcel A Unit 2, The Natural Environment, Section A, The Physical the Levels were under water. This World, Topic 2: River Landscapes, pages 21 and 22 was caused by human and physical http://qualifications.pearson.com/content/dam/pdf/ GCSE/Geography-A/2009/Specification%20and%20 factors. The floods were the most sample%20assessments/9781446911907_GCSE_ severe ever known in this area. Lin_Geog_A_Issue_5.pdf No one was prepared for the extent Edexcel B Unit 1, Dynamic Planet, Section B, Small-scale Dynamic Planet, Topic 6, River Processes and Pressures, page 17 of damage brought by the http://qualifications.pearson.com/content/dam/pdf/ floodwater. Several villages and GCSE/Geography-B/2009/Specification%20and%20 farms were flooded and hundreds of sample%20assessments/9781446911914_GCSE_Lin_ Geog_B_Issue_5.pdf people had to be evacuated. OCR B Unit 562, Key Geographical Themes, Theme 1: Rivers The risk of flooding is likely to and Coasts, pages 12 and 13 increase in the future due to climate http://www.ocr.org.uk/Images/82581-specification.pdf change.
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset Mobile Library the Mobile Library Visits the Communities Listed Below
    Somerset Mobile Library The Mobile Library visits the communities listed below. To find the date of a visit, identify the community and the route letter. Scroll down to the relevant route schedule. The location of each stop is given as well as the dates and times of visits for the current year. Community Day Route Community Day Route A E-F Alcombe FRI L East Brent FRI H Ashcott TUE N East Chinnock TUE E East Coker TUE E B East Lydford THU K Babcary THU C Edington TUE N Badgworth FRI H Evercreech THU K Bagley FRI H Exford FRI D Baltonsborough THU C Barton St. David THU C Beercrocombe THU P G Benter WED J Goathurst WED O Biddisham FRI H Greenham TUE I Blue Anchor FRI L Brent Knoll FRI H H Bridgetown (Exe Valley) TUE A Hardington Mandeville TUE E Bridgwater (Children's Centre) FRI Q Hatch Beauchamp THU P Broadway THU P Hemington MON M Brompton Regis TUE A Hillfarance TUE I Burtle TUE N Holcombe WED J Butleigh THU C I Ilchester WED B C Ilton THU P Cannington THU G Isle Abbots THU P Catcott TUE N Isle Brewers THU P Chantry WED J Chapel Allerton FRI H J-K Charlton Horethorne WED B Keinton Mandeville THU C Chedzoy FRI Q Kilve THU G Chillington WED F Kingston St. Mary WED O Chilton Polden TUE N Chiselborough TUE E L Churchinford WED F Leigh upon Mendip WED J Coleford WED J Lydeard St. Lawrence TUE I Combwich THU G Lympsham FRI H Cotford St Luke TUE I Creech St Michael THU P Crowcombe FRI L Cutcombe FRI D D Doulting THU K Durston WED O Community Day Route Community Day Route M S Merriott TUE E Shapwick TUE N Middlezoy FRI Q Shepton Mallet(Shwgrd) THU K Milton TUE E Shipham FRI H Minehead (Butlins) FRI L Shurton THU G Monksilver FRI L South Barrow WED B Moorlinch FRI Q Southwood THU C Mudford WED B Spaxton WED O Stapley WED F N Stawell FRI Q North Curry WED O Stockland Bristol THU G North Petherton (Stockmoor) FRI Q Stogumber FRI L North Wootton THU K Stogursey THU G Norton St.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Opportunity Guide Price £260,000 Parrett Works, Martock
    Development Opportunity Guide Price £260,000 Parrett Works, Martock Land and Buildings, Parrett Works, Martock, Location The development site enjoys an excellent position on the River Parrett in the Parish of Somerset, TA12 6AE Martock, north of the A303 some 7 miles west of Yeovil. Situated approximately 1 mile west of Martock itself, the site has a strong tradition of light industrial use and employment, 0.67 acre site comprising yard, part-built buildings extending to with existing residential properties and farmland bordering the site. approximately 16,500 sq ft with B1/B8 use and building materials. Martock falls within the picturesque and popular South Somerset region with local Historic site situated adjacent the River Parrett. commercial centres including Taunton to the north west and Yeovil to the south east within easy reach. There are an excellent range of shops and businesses in nearby Martock, South The site has strong potential for development of commercial units Petherton and Langport. The A303 is a short distance to the south and the regional towns subject to the necessary consents. of Yeovil and Taunton are almost equidistant. Both have mainline rail links. Huish Episcopi academy and sixth form centre and there are many public schools within easy A delightful detached five bedroom farmhouse, Fantastic locationenjoying in popularan Somersetelevated Parish of Martock, with reach. close links to the A303, A358 and M5 Motorway. position with the benefit of far reaching souther Uniquely views. opportunity to acquire the freehold interest of an historic site with fantastic potential for further development subject to the Excellentnecessary family consents.
    [Show full text]