National Association of Foreign-Trade Zones

The impact of Foreign-Trade Zones the 50 states & Puerto Rico About This Report

The Impact of Foreign-Trade Zones on American States and Puerto Rico provides a state-by-state breakdown of foreign-trade zone activity in the 2006 fiscal year.* Each of these state analyses give special attention to the factors reflecting foreign-trade zone growth: annual merchandise volume, exports, employment, and business firm engagement. These statistics are extracted from the required Annual Reports submitted by each foreign-trade zone to the Foreign-Trade Zone Board in the U.S. Department of Commerce. These reports are public information.

The goal of this study is to increase public awareness of foreign-trade zone activity, and the roles foreign-trade zones play in each state’s economy. Although the Foreign-Trade Zones program is not large in scale, the statistical and qualitative scale of this report clarifies the important role that foreign- trade zones play in the U.S. and international trade. It also facilitates year- over-year comparison and assessment regarding program effectiveness.

In the material presented for each state, Chart 1, entitled “Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones,” defines annual volume as the currency value of received merchandise, both domestic and foreign, and includes zone-to-zone transfers to provide a complete picture of the business conducted in each zone. Exports are considered the currency value of all goods that leave the foreign-trade zone directly without first entering U.S. commerce, regardless of origin before entrance into the zone. Employment includes all persons engaged in activities under zone procedures. Active firms reflect the total number of firms that were served by the zone during the fiscal year.

This report has been supported by U.S. foreign-trade zone grantee members of the National Association of Foreign-Trade Zones in an effort to encourage a greater understanding of foreign-trade zones and their role in national and local economic development.

The statistical analysis in this report was created by Elizabeth Hanpeter and Admir Muzurovic, both MA candidates, 2008 at the Elliott School of International Affairs at George Washington University and Research Analysts for the National Association of Foreign-Trade Zones.

*The fiscal year began on October 1, 2005 and ended on September 30, 2006.

The Big Picture 2006

The National Impact of the Foreign-Trade Zones Program

Foreign-trade zones (FTZs) were created in the United If we exclude the oil producing states of Texas, States to provide special U.S. Customs and Border Louisiana, Alaska, and California, the total annual Protection (CBP) procedures to U.S. firms engaged in volume for 2006 falls to $226 billion. However, this international trade-related activities. These procedures number still reflects a 14% increase over 2005. were designed to encourage in the domestic industry. FTZs consist of general purpose zones (GPZs), which maintain multiple users and are Exports to Foreign used primarily for warehousing and distribution. FTZs Countries may contain subzones each serving a single company The exports from U.S. foreign-trade zones to foreign usually for manufacturing activity. The FTZ program countries totaled $30 billion in 2006. These export requires that subzones serve the public interest and figures show a 30% increase from the $23 billion in zone produce a net positive economic effect. This study exports reported for 2005. Exports of manufactured provides insights into domestic employment creation and commodities from all of the U.S. grew by just under 16% retention, as well as the impact of trade on state and in the 2005-2006 period. local development.

With the reduction of tariff barriers through the WTO Employment and an increasing number of bilateral trade agreements, many industries are receiving only marginal benefits In 2006, foreign-trade zones employed 360,109 from zone status. The pharmaceutical, automotive, and persons. While the 2006 figure is slightly more (5%) oil industries continue to be the primary beneficiaries than jobs reported in 2005, it must be noted that zone- of the FTZ program for manufacturing. A diverse array related employment is becoming increasingly capital of industries use zones for warehousing, inspection, intensive. The NAFTZ is working to ensure the accuracy labeling, and distribution purposes. Zones in 27 states of zone employment reporting, particularly for part-time had an average increase in annual volume of 15% or and contract labor. more. Additionally, zones in 25 states had an average increase of 5% or more in exports. These statistics highlight the continued importance of the foreign-trade Firms Engaged in Zone zone program. Activities

There were 2,646 firms served by foreign-trade zones FTZ Volume in 2006 in 2006. This figure represents a 5% increase from the 2,519 firms served in 2005. A number of firms, located The combined value of shipments into U.S. foreign- in activated zones, do not use zone procedures, though trade zones (both general purpose zones and subzones) they would like to maintain this option for the future. totaled $491 billion in 2006. This activity value represents a 20% increase over the $410 billion in zone receipts reported by the NAFTZ for 2005. A large percentage of the increase in annual volume handled by FTZs is attributable to the higher price of oil. Therefore, it is difficult to measure the true change in activity levels.

Foreign-Trade Zone Locations

There are 256 General Purpose Foreign-Trade Zones & 498 Subzones* in the U.S.

*These include both active and inactive subzones.

Top 15 State Ranking 2006

Receipts by Employment of Foreign-Trade Zones Foreign-Trade Zones

Annual Volume State Employment State ($ millions) Texas 57,924 Texas 149,212.65 Ohio 42,934 Louisiana 99,013.66 Illinois 22,293 Ohio 30,872.67 Louisiana 22,018 California 26,683.63 Kentucky 19,057 New Jersey 21,132.92 Tennessee 18,633 Tennessee 19,902.58 Pennsylvania 17,871 Kentucky 19,521.74 Arizona 16,519 Pennsylvania 18,620.31 California 15,691 Illinois 18,236.54 New Jersey 15,209 South Carolina 11,473.74 Indiana 12,701 Mississippi 11,221.97 Michigan 11,639 Indiana 10,992.99 Alabama 10,451 Alabama 9,815.67 Mississippi 10,340 Michigan 8,559.31 Puerto Rico 10,016 Washington 7,071.87

Exports from Number of Firms Foreign-Trade Zones Actively Engaged in Foreign-Trade Zones Annual Volume State ($ millions) State Business Firms Texas 6,335.42 Texas 480 Alabama 3,876.65 Hawaii 373 Tennessee 2,818.52 California 355 Ohio 2,468.21 Florida 252 South Carolina 1,914.62 Ohio 139 Florida 1,663.62 Puerto Rico 124 Kentucky 1,545.71 New York 120 Louisiana 1092.90 Maryland 93 Illinois 977.40 Louisiana 92 Mississippi 955.86 Nevada 73 California 704.37 Michigan 68 Hawaii 643.41 Illinois 59 Georgia 619.84 Georgia 50 Puerto Rico 523.30 Tennessee 34 Arizona 519.26 New Jersey 27

Alabama

Foreign-Trade Zones: 5 Exports: $3.88 billion Active Firms: 23 Annual Volume: $9.82 billion Employment: 10,451 Active Subzones: 8

Alabama Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 82 Mobile 2,877 2,338.14 67.47 12 6 No. 83 Huntsville 117 43.94 6.03 4 0 No. 98 Birmingham 4,025 4,799.98 3,106.16 3 1 No. 222 Montgomery 3,143 2,595.38 695.88 2 1

No. 233 Dothan 289 38.23 1.11 2 0

Total 5 10,451 9,815.67 3,876.65 23 8

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Alabama 2005-2006) $ millions 12000 The volume of FTZ activity in Alabama increased 2005 85.2% from $5.30 billion in 2005 to $9.82 billion 10000 2006 in 2006. In particular, FTZ No. 222 experienced an 8000 increase of 100.3% due to the expansion of activity by 6000 Hyundai Motor Manufacturing. 4000 Exports from Alabama FTZs increased 206.4% from 2000 $1.27 billion in 2005 to $3.88 billion in 2006. FTZ No. 0 98 experienced a $1.94 billion increase in exports due Annual Volume Exports to the expansion of the Tuscaloosa facility by Mercedes-

Benz U.S. International, Inc., enabling the plant to Employment Percentage Changes significantly increase the production of automobiles for (Alabama 2005-2006) foreign markets. Exports of manufactured commodities 30.0% from Alabama increased by 12.7% during 2005-2006 calendar year.* 20.0% Jobs associated with Alabama FTZs increased 9.8% 9.8% over the past year, reaching 10,451 in 2006. 10.0% In contrast, total nonfarm employment in Alabama increased by 1.0% over the past fiscal year. 1.0% 0.0% FTZ Employment State Employment

Source: Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Alabama Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 82 Mobile, Alabama No. 98 Birmingham, Alabama FTZ No. 82 maintains 6 subzones and serves 12 FTZ No. 98 maintains 1 subzone and serves 3 firms, businesses engaged in shipbuilding, repair, oil refining, the largest of which is Mercedes-Benz. The City of the production of magnetic recording products, Birmingham continues to coordinate marketing efforts chemical, and petrochemical products. Growth in zone and educate the trade community about the benefits of activity was due to the increase in the price of oil, the the FTZ. expansion of manufacturing by E.I. du Pont de Nemours No. 222 Montgomery, Alabama and Company, Inc., Kvaerner Oilfield products, and the FTZ No. 222 maintains 1 subzone and serves 2 start-up of zone procedures by Bender Shipbuilding. businesses. Annual volume increased largely due to the No. 83 Huntsville, Alabama increase in production by Hyundai Motor Manufacturing. FTZ No. 83 maintains 0 subzones and serves 4 In addition, the Foreign-Trade Zones Board approved businesses. The decrease in annual volume was due the application for manufacturing authority on behalf of to one of the General Purpose Zone Users moving Mobis Alabama, a major tier-1 Hyundai supplier. its distribution facility to El Paso, TX in May 2006. No. 233 Dothan (Panama City), Alabama The firms in FTZ No. 83 serve mainly as just-in-time FTZ No. 233 maintains 0 subzones and serves 2 distribution facilities and third-party warehouses for the businesses. Zone activity centers around just-in-time manufacturing of display modules. zone-to-zone transfers of merchandise and provides employment for 289 people. Long-term growth of zone activity is anticipated to be driven by Dothan’s ideal location as a distribution center. Alaska

Foreign-Trade Zones: 5 Exports: $0.22 billion Active Firms: 5 Annual Volume: $3.20 billion Employment: 641 Active Subzones: 1

Alaska Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 108 Valdez 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 159 St. Paul 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 160 Anchorage 641 3,203.42 220.00 5 1 No. 195 Fairbanks 0 0.00 0.00 0 0

No. 232 Kodiak 0 0.00 0.00 0 0

Total 5 641 3,203.42 220.00 5 1

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Alaska 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Alaska increased 3500 2005 3000 15.9% from $2.76 billion in 2005 to $3.20 billion in 2006 2006. 2500

2000 Exports from Alaskan FTZs increased 56.1% from 1500 $0.14 billion in 2005 to $0.22 billion in 2006. This 1000 growth is due in part to the increase of the price of jet 500 fuel. In addition, numerous international airlines used 0 foreign status fuel received and disbursed through the Annual Volume Exports zone. They were United Parcel Services (UPS), China Airlines, Airlines, and Nippon Cargo. Export activity Employment Percentage Changes also included several shipments of fuel oil to Hong Kong (Alaska 2005-2006) and bunker fuel to several foreign vessels. Exports of manufactured commodities from Alaska decreased 4.5% 36.9% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.*

3.0% Jobs associated with Alaska FTZs increased 1.6% over the past year and reached 641 in 2006, while total 1.6% 1.7% nonfarm employment in Alaska increased by 1.7%. 1.5%

0.0% FTZ Employment State Employment

Source: Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Alaska Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 108 Valdez, Alaska No. 160 Anchorage, Alaska FTZ No. 108 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 FTZ No. 160 maintains 1 subzone and serves 5 businesses. The City of Valdez is continuing with its businesses. Zone activity centers on the receipt, marketing plan to focus attention on companies that storage, and delivery of foreign and domestic status jet may be involved with pipeline construction. fuel.

No. 159 St. Paul, Alaska No. 195 Fairbanks, Alaska FTZ No. 159 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 FTZ No. 195 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. The City of Saint Paul is actively marketing businesses. the zone as part of the economic development plans for No. 232 Kodiak, Alaska the city. FTZ No. 232 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. FY 2006 data for FTZ No. 232 is unavailable. Arizona

Foreign-Trade Zones: 7 Exports: $0.52 billion Active Firms: 27 Annual Volume: $2.11 billion Employment: 16,519 Active Subzones: 9

Arizona Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 48 Pima County (Tucson) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 60 Nogales 32 0.47 0.00 13 0 No. 75 Phoenix 16,009 2007.85 442.23 9 8 No. 139 Sierra Vista (Naco) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 174 Pima County (Tucson) 234 76.69 77.00 4 0 No. 219 Yuma (San Luis) 244 25.46 0.03 1 1

No. 221 Mesa (Phoenix) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0

Total 7 16,519 2,110.46 519.26 27 9

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Arizona 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Arizona decreased 2500 2005 1.9% from $2.15 billion in 2005 to $2.11 billion in 2006 2000 2006.

1500 Exports from Arizona FTZs decreased 13.3% from $0.60 billion in 2005 to $0.52 billion in 2006. Exports 1000 of manufactured commodities from Arizona increased 500 7.6% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* 0 Jobs associated with Arizona FTZs increased 4.0% Annual Volume Exports over the past year, reaching 16,519 in 2006, while total Employment Percentage Changes nonfarm employment in Arizona increased by 4.7%. (Arizona 2005-2006)

15.0%

12.5%

10.0%

7.5%

4.0% 4.7% 5.0%

2.5%

0.0% FTZ Employment State Employment

Source: Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Arizona Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 48 Pima County (Tucson), Arizona No. 174 Pima County (Tucson), Arizona FTZ No. 48 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 FTZ No. 174 maintained 0 subzones and served 4 businesses. FY 2006 data is unavailable from businesses. Although Imation Corporation closed FTZ No. 48. its operations and de-activated its subzone, the FTZ witnessed a slight rise in annual volume and a large No. 60 Nogales, Arizona increase in employment because the zone managed to FTZ No. 60 maintains 0 subzones and serves 13 secure a new business distribution facility, which was businesses, which are primarily involved in the storage eventually bought by Pella Corporation. Additionally, and distribution of apparel. Renewed activity within the there was an increase in the storage and distribution of zone is due to the current growth in the Maquiladora finished goods, such as integrated electronic circuits, business in Mexico and the increase of In-bond printed circuits, and electrical conversion parts. shipments destined to Mexico from suppliers in Asia and Europe. No. 219 Yuma (San Luis), Arizona FTZ No. 219 maintains 1 subzone and serves 1 No. 75 Phoenix, Arizona business, the Gowan Company, which produces chemical FTZ No. 75 maintains 8 subzones and serves 9 products. The FTZ representative is working directly with businesses, including Conair, Intel, Abbott Laboratories, the Greater Yuma Economic Development Corporation PetSmart, and STMicroelectronics, Inc. Employment in (GYEDC) on a potential customer requesting zone status, the zone totals 16,519 persons who are responsible for while the Yuma Commerce Center continues to actively the production of aircraft equipment, pharmaceuticals, pursue potential business partners. and semiconductor devices. No. 221 Mesa (Phoenix), Arizona No. 139 Sierra Vista (Naco), Arizona FTZ No. 221 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 FTZ No. 139 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses, though it is considered a promising businesses. FTZ No. 139’s data is unavailable for 2006. economic asset by Williams Gateway Airport which maintains plans for future development and seeks to promote its economic advantages through public-private partnerships. Arkansas

Foreign-Trade Zones: 1 Exports: $0.00 billion Active Firms: 1 Annual Volume: $1.52 billion Employment: 462 Active Subzones: 1

Arkansas Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 14 Little Rock 462 1,524.39 0.00 1 1 Total 1 462 1,524.39 0.00 1 1

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Arkansas 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Arkansas increased 1600 2005 1400 93.75% from $0.79 billion in 2005 to $1.52 billion in 2006 2006. This is because of the increase in the price of 1200 1000 crude oil and the ability of Lion Oil to increase its refining 800 capacity at the El Dorado plant. 600 Exports from Arkansas FTZs remained at zero, 400 200 while exports of manufactured commodities from 0 Arkansas decreased 3.2% during the 2005-2006 Annual Volume Exports calendar year.* Employment Percentage Changes Jobs associated with Arkansas FTZs decreased (Arkansas 2005-2006)

34.6% over the past year. The total nonfarm 10.0% employment in Arkansas increased by 0.9%. FTZ Employment 0.9%

-5.0% State Employment

Arkansas -20.0% Foreign-Trade Zones

-35.0% No. 14 Little Rock, Arkansas -34.6% FTZ No. 14 maintains 1 subzone and serves Lion Oil, -50.0% Inc., which operates the El Dorado oil refinery. The Source: Foreign-Trade Zones Board , U.S. Department refinery has 12 processing units and produces a broad of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of range of petroleum and petrochemical products, which Labor Statistics. are generally consumed in the retail market of the United States.

California

Foreign-Trade Zones: 18 Exports: $0.70 billion Active Firms: 355 Annual Volume: $26.68 billion Employment: 15,691 Active Subzones: 12

California Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 3 San Francisco 1,185 6,668.99 226.84 61 1 No. 18 San Jose (San Francisco) 6 161.49 162.86 2 0 No. 50 Long Beach 8,548 5,888.02 74.29 161 3 No. 56 Oakland 91 48.41 126.80 40 0 No. 143 W. Sacramento (San Francisco/Oakland) 22 10.21 0.25 1 1 No. 153 San Diego 2,016 131.97 47.40 63 2 No. 191 Palmdale (L.A. - Long Beach) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 202 Los Angeles (L.A. - Long Beach) 2,968 9,892.36 33.97 19 3 No. 205 Port Hueneme 450 3,661.13 7.63 3 1 No. 226 Merced (Fresno) 346 88.49 21.93 2 0 No. 231 Stockton 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 236 Palm Springs 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 237 Santa Maria (Port San Luis) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 243 Victorville 17 2.82 2.14 1 0 No. 244 Riverside County (L.A. - Long Beach) 20 119.53 0.00 1 0 No. 248 Eureka 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 253 Butte County (Oroville) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 257 Imperial County 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 18 15,691 26,683.63 704.37 355 12

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports $ millions (California 2005-2006) The volume of FTZ activity in California increased 30000 2005 15.7% from $23.06 billion in 2005 to $26.68 billion in 25000 2006 2006. This is primarily due to the expansion of activity in 20000 the Port of Los Angeles (FTZ No. 202) and the increase in the price of oil. 15000

10000

5000

0 Annual Volume Exports Zone Development Employment Percentage Changes (California 2005-2006) Exports from California FTZs decreased 16.7% from 25.0% $0.84 billion in 2005 to $0.70 billion in 2006 due to 20.0% the drop in the number of active firms in FTZ No. 153 and the reduction of exports by ConocoPhillips in FTZ 15.0% No. 202. Exports of manufactured commodities from 10.0% California increased 10.9% during the 2005-2006 7.3% calendar year.* 5.0% 1.1% 0.0% Jobs associated with California FTZs increased 7.3% FTZ Employment State Employment over the past year, reaching 15,691 in 2006. The total Source: Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department nonfarm employment in California increased by 1.1%. of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Most of the rise in FTZ employment is accounted for by Labor Statistics. FTZ No. 50, the increase in the number of active firms operating in the GPZ, and the growth of the National Steel and Shipbuilding Company.

California Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 3 San Francisco, California No. 143 West Sacramento FTZ No. 3 maintains 1 subzone and serves 61 (San Francisco/Oakland), California businesses. Chevron accounts for most of the FTZ FTZ No. 143 maintains 1 subzone and serves one activity with the operation of its Richmond oil refinery business, Ceronix, Inc., that manufactures high- where approximately 40 finished products are produced. resolution color video display monitors for the gaming and recreational industries in the U.S. No. 18 San Jose (San Francisco), California FTZ No. 18 maintains 0 subzones and serves 2 No. 153 San Diego, California businesses in its general purpose zone. One firm FTZ No. 153 maintains 2 subzones and serves 63 active processes computer parts and integrated circuits, firms. These include the Callaway Company that while the other receives refined white sugar. The City of created 75 more jobs and DNP Electronics America, LLC, San Jose is actively marketing the FTZ to businesses which increased its production of projection screens operating throughout Silicon Valley and neighboring for Rear Projection Televisions. On the other hand, the regions. annual volume in the GPZ decreased due to the drop in the number of active firms from 87 to 61. No. 50 Long Beach, California FTZ No. 50 maintains 3 subzones and serves 161 No. 191 Palmdale (L.A. - Long Beach), California businesses. The businesses operating in the subzones FTZ No. 191 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 are: National Steel and Shipbuilding Company, BP businesses. Products North America, and Ricoh Electronics, Inc. No. 202 Los Angeles (L.A. - Long Beach), California These firms are involved in the manufacturing of marine FTZ No. 202 maintains 3 subzones and serves 19 vessels, crude oil refining, and in the production of businesses, including 3M Pharmaceuticals, Chevron, office equipment. and ConocoPhillips. The large increase in annual volume No. 56 Oakland, California and employment can be attributed to the rise in the FTZ No. 56 maintains 0 subzones and serves 40 price of crude oil and the expansion of activity at the businesses. Although the number of firms within the El Segundo refinery by Chevron and at the Los Angeles GPZ increased over the past fiscal year, annual volume refinery by ConocoPhillips. declined significantly due to a drop in merchandise received within the zone. California Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 205 Port Hueneme, California No. 243 Victorville, California FTZ No. 205 maintains 1 subzone and serves 3 FTZ No. 243 maintains 0 subzones and serves 1 businesses. Zone activity is concentrated primarily business. The zone experienced increases in both in importing automobiles and preparing them for the annual volume and exports compared to last fiscal year domestic market by installing air emissions packages, primarily due to expanded activity in the processing stereos, and other attachable parts. However, one of the of apparel. The Southern California Logistics Airport major active firms, Mazda Motors of America, decided to Authority continues to aggressively market the FTZ. relocate its operations to the Port of San Diego, and the No. 244 Riverside County zone is seeking viable replacements. (L.A. - Long Beach), California No. 226 Merced (Fresno), California FTZ No. 244 maintains 0 subzones and serves 1 FTZ No. 226 maintains 0 subzones and serves 2 business, Philips Electronics, which uses the zone for business firms that manufacture water pumps and distribution of its consumer electronics. provide cold storage for ice cream. The zone continues No. 248 Eureka, California to market itself at business forums and regional FTZ No. 248 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 marketing meetings. businesses. The Zone Administrator is working to No. 231 Stockton, California activate a marine terminal located within the FTZ and FTZ No. 231 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 will further enhance marketing and recruitment efforts. businesses. The zone has stepped up its marketing No. 253 Butte County efforts by translating brochures into Chinese and (Oroville), California proposing several innovative uses of the zone for FTZ No. 253 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 potential clients. businesses. No. 236 Palm Springs, California No. 257 Imperial County, California FTZ No. 236 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 FTZ No. 257 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. businesses. ITC-Diligence, Inc. has proactively No. 237 Santo Maria (Port San Luis), California marketed the zone in conjunction with the IVFTZ Joint FTZ No. 237 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 Powers Authority. businesses. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) provisionally activated the FTZ and its Grant of Authority was reinstated by the Foreign-Trade Zones Board in February 2006.

Colorado

Foreign-Trade Zones: 2 Exports: $0.00 billion Active Firms: 1 Annual Volume: $0.00 billion Employment: 0 Active Subzones: 0

Colorado Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 112 El Paso County (Denver) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 123 Denver 0 0.00 0.00 1 0 Total 2 0 0.00 0.00 1 0

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Colorado Foreign-Trade Zones The volume of FTZ activity in Colorado remained at zero in 2006. One firm operated in FTZ No. 123 during No. 112 El Paso County (Denver), Colorado the reported fiscal year. FTZ No. 112 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. Exports from Colorado FTZs remained at zero. Exports of manufactured commodities from Colorado No. 123 Denver, Colorado increased 37.0% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* FTZ No. 123 maintains 0 subzones and serves 1 business firm, Aspen Distribution, Inc. The FTZ received Jobs associated with Colorado FTZs remained foreign status merchandise in 2006, but the volume at zero. The total nonfarm employment in Colorado received was minimal and rounds down to $0 million. increased by 1.8%.

Connecticut

Foreign-Trade Zones: 4 Exports: $0.00 million Active Firms: 5 Annual Volume: $113.50 million Employment: 311 Active Subzones: 1

Connecticut Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 71 Windsor Locks (Hartford) 2 13.44 0.00 2 0 No. 76 Bridgeport 2 0.00 0.00 1 0 No. 162 North Haven 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 208 New London 307 100.06 0.00 2 1 Total 4 311 113.50 0.00 5 1

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Connecticut 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Connecticut increased 120 2005 116.9% from $52.33 million in 2005 to $113.50 2006 million in 2006. This increase is the result of Pfizer, 90 Inc.’s higher levels of pharmaceutical manufacturing, 60 particularly in the production of the drug Selamectin in FTZ No. 208. 30

Exports from Connecticut FTZs decreased 100.00% 0 from $30.28 million in 2005 to $0.00 million in 2006. Annual Volume Exports This decrease is due to FTZ No. 208 GPZ operator’s purchase of another domestic company’s inventory Employment Percentage Changes of merchandise, i.e. gloves. Exports of manufactured (Connecticut 2005-2006) commodities from Connecticut increased 57.0% during 10.0% the 2005-2006 calendar year.* FTZ Employment 0.5% 0.0% State Employment Jobs associated with Connecticut FTZs decreased -10.0% 25.2% from 416 in 2005 to 311 in 2006 due to -20.0% Pfizer’s greater investment in machinery. Total nonfarm -25.2% employment in Connecticut increased by 0.5%. -30.0%

-40.0%

-50.0%

Source: Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Connecticut Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 71 Windsor Locks (Hartford), Connecticut No. 162 North Haven, Connecticut FTZ No. 71 maintains 0 subzones and serves 2 FTZ No. 162 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. A total of 2 people are employed in general businesses. No FY 2006 data was available from purpose zone warehousing. Activity centers primarily FTZ No. 162. around one importer who has used the zone for several No. 208 New London, Connecticut years to store machinery as it waits to be sold locally. FTZ No. 208 maintains 1 subzone and serves 2 No. 76 Bridgeport, Connecticut businesses, including Pfizer, Inc., which operates in the FTZ No. 76 maintained 0 subzones and served 1 subzone. Pfizer’s Groton operations include chemical business. Site No. 1, the only active site in FTZ 76, compound purification, processing, manufacturing and deactivated effective December 31, 2005. The only warehousing, and research and development operations User in the Site during this time period was a company for pharmaceuticals, consumer health care, and animal known as C&M Enterprises, Inc. Their principle activities health care products. included the import of liquor and tobacco products for embassies, primarily in New York. Delaware

Foreign-Trade Zones: 1 Exports: $23.39 million Active Firms: 3 Annual Volume: $3.62 billion Employment: 1,976 Active Subzones: 2

Delaware Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 99 Wilmington 1,976 3,622.97 23.39 3 2 Total 1 1,976 3,622.97 23.39 3 2

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Delaware 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Delaware decreased 6000 2005 31.3% from $5.33 billion in 2005 to $3.62 billion 5000 2006 in 2006. This decrease is due to a reduction in zone 4000 activity. 3000

Exports from Delaware FTZs decreased by 32.6% 2000 from $34.68 million in 2005 to $23.39 million in 2006. 1000 Exports of manufactured commodities from Delaware 0 increased 46.6% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* Annual Volume Exports

Jobs associated with Delaware FTZs decreased Employment Percentage Changes 16.6% over the past year to 1,976 while total nonfarm (Delaware 2005-2006) employment in Delaware increased by 1.9%. 10.0%

5.0% 1.9% FTZ Employment 0.0% Delaware State Employment Foreign-Trade Zones -5.0% -10.0%

No. 99 Wilmington and Kent County, Delaware -15.0%

FTZ No. 99 maintains 2 subzones and serves 3 -16.6% -20.0% businesses, including AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, -25.0% the Premcor Refining Group, and Citrosuco. AstraZeneca Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of uses the zone primarily for the storage of foreign Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of products. While Premcor’s and Citrosuco’s volumes Labor Statistics. increased in 2006, AstraZeneca’s volume declined due to a reduction in activity and incorrect reporting in 2005.

Florida

Foreign-Trade Zones: 20 Exports: $1.66 billion Active Firms: 252 Annual Volume: $5.88 billion Employment: 4,563 Active Subzones: 10

Florida Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 25 Broward County (Port Everglades) 421 2,586.24 1,166.37 87 4 No. 32 Miami 996 392.64 178.02 80 0 No. 42 Orlando 679 606.06 173.45 42 1 No. 64 Jacksonville 593 989.10 50.73 7 1 No. 65 Panama City 265 2.84 6.18 1 0 No. 79 Tampa 594 1,007.66 17.32 8 1 No. 135 Palm Beach County 57 1.26 1.19 1 0 No. 136 Brevard County (Canaveral) 56 3.52 2.29 20 1 No. 166 Homestead 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 169 Manatee County (Port Manatee) 200 3.35 0.14 1 1 No. 180 Miami (Wynwood) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 193 Pinellas County (St. Petersburg) 661 100.74 0.31 1 1 No. 198 Volusia & Flagler Counties 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 213 Fort Myers 15 118.09 8.80 1 0 No. 215 Sebring 15 0.00 0.00 1 0 No. 217 Ocala 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 218 St. Lucie County (Fort Pierce) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 241 Fort Lauderdale (Port Everglades) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 249 Pensacola 6 16.00 16.00 1 0 No. 250 Sanford 5 53.39 42.82 1 0 Total 20 4,563 5,880.89 1,663.62 252 10

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau. Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Florida 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Florida increased 7000 2005 25.3% from $4.69 billion in 2005 to $5.88 billion in 6000 2006

2006. The surge in volume is mainly due to increases 5000

in the price of jet fuel, which is handled by FTZ Nos. 25, 4000 42, 79, 213, and 250. The expansion of production by 3000 firms within FTZ No. 64 also significantly contributed to 2000 this increase. 1000

Exports from Florida FTZs increased 30.9% from 0 Annual Volume Exports $1.27 billion in 2005 to $1.66 billion in 2006. The majority of this increase is due to the higher price of jet Employment Percentage Changes fuel. Exports of manufactured commodities from Florida (Florida 2005-2006) increased 4.7% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* 8.0%

2.8% Jobs associated with Florida FTZs decreased 4.7% 4.0% over the past year, while total nonfarm employment in FTZ Employment 0.0% Florida increased by 2.8%. State Employment -4.0% -4.7% -8.0%

-12.0%

-16.0%

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Florida Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 25 Broward County (Port Everglades), Florida No. 42 Orlando, Florida FTZ No. 25 maintains 4 subzones and serves 87 FTZ No. 42 maintains 1 subzone and serves 42 businesses. Two of the subzone operators, CITGO businesses, a slight increase in total businesses Petroleum and Chevron Products Company, use the compared to the previous year. However, most of zone for duty-free storage of petroleum products for the zone increase in annual volume is the result of re-exportation. The general purpose zone distributes increased jet fuel supplies and higher jet fuel prices products that include alcohol, tobacco, automobiles, entering the activated fuel storage facility at Orlando clothing, and electronics. Annual volume and exports for International Airport. FTZ No. 25 increased in all subzones, and particularly in No. 64 Jacksonville, Florida those that handle petroleum products. FTZ No. 64 maintains 1 subzone and serves 7 No. 32 Miami, Florida businesses. Most of the activity in the zone consisted of FTZ No. 32 maintains 0 subzones and serves 80 auto processing, consumer leather goods distribution, businesses. FTZ No. 32 provides processing of export- and alcoholic beverage distribution. The increases in related information, storage, and other international annual volume and exports can be mainly attributed to commercial services for small and medium-sized firms. a new FTZ operation, which began importing, storing, Annual volume, exports, and employment increased and distributing alcoholic beverages from Europe on slightly within the zone due to the improving Latin January 1, 2006. Meanwhile, the grantee’s marketing American economies and the incorporation of new and efforts have successfully attracted an all water direct more ambitious marketing strategies. Asian service which will begin operating in December of 2008. This new service will likely increase interest and opportunities for further FTZ program participation. Florida Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 65 Panama City, Florida No. 180 Miami (Wynwood), Florida FTZ No. 65 maintains 0 subzones and serves 1 FTZ No. 180 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 business, Oceaneering International, Inc., that supports businesses. FY 2006 data for FTZ No. 180 was the offshore oil industry by importing and processing unavailable. survey equipment. The Panama City Port Authority No. 193 Pinellas County (St. Petersburg), Florida continues efforts to attract multi-national corporations FTZ No. 193 maintains 1 subzone and serves 1 to the FTZ. business, Cardinal Health PTS, LLC. Over the past No. 79 Tampa, Florida fiscal year, Cardinal Health experienced a decline FTZ No. 79 maintains 1 subzone and serves 8 in the movement of merchandise and exports of its businesses. Overall activity in the zone increased pharmaceutical products within the zone. Pinellas substantially as a result of combined jet fuel operations County Economic Development has been very active and rising jet fuel prices at three general purpose zone in promoting its revised marketing and business sites operated by Kinder Morgan Liquids Terminals development strategy, and is in the process of activating LLC, Motiva Enterprises LLC, and Aircraft Services a designated area for a new company in the zone. International, Inc. The Tampa Port Authority continues to No. 198 Volusia & Flager Counties, Florida attempt to attract further container cargo business. FTZ No. 198 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 No. 135 Palm Beach County, Florida businesses. FTZ No. 135 maintains 0 subzones and serves 1 No. 213 Fort Myers, Florida business, Port of Palm Beach Cold, which distributes FTZ No. 213 maintains 0 subzones and serves 1 perishable foods and exotic wines. The Port of Palm business, Swissport Fueling, Inc., which is an airport Beach was conducting a feasibility study in conjunction fuel service company that serves a number of national with the Florida Department of Transportation for the and international airlines. Higher jet fuel prices construction of an inland port to be located in the Belle accounted for the increase in the zone’s annual volume Glade-South Bay area, which could potentially increase and exports. business in the zone. No. 215 Sebring, Florida No. 136 Brevard County (Canaveral), Florida FTZ No. 215 maintains 0 subzones and serves 1 FTZ No. 136 maintains 1 subzone and serves 20 business. Zone activity is concentrated in the sale of businesses. The zone warehouses and distributes parts fuel to outbound aircraft. The zone was active in 2006, and supplies for cruise ships, machinery and packaging but the level of activity was minimal and rounded down supplies for the meat and cheese industries, and blank to $0 million. The Sebring Airport Authority continues polyethylene tubing for use in the food industry. to market the zone through brochures, a partnership No. 166 Homestead, Florida with the Bahamas Ministry of Trade, and ongoing FTZ No. 166 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 negotiations with the Sebring International Raceway businesses. Latam Foreign-Trade Zone, Inc. has been regarding the feasibility of importing racecars directly approved as the operator of the zone and its first active into the Zone. user to start operations in the upcoming fiscal year. No. 217 Ocala, Florida No. 169 Manatee County (Port Manatee), Florida FTZ No. 217 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 FTZ No. 169 maintains 1 subzone and serves 1 businesses. business, Aso Corporation, which produces adhesive bandages and first aid products. Port Manatee continues to market the zone, promoting the Port Manatee Commerce Center, a warehousing complex entering the finishing phases of its construction. Florida Foreign-Trade Zones

FTZ No. 218 St. Lucie County (Fort Pierce), Florida No. 250 Sanford, Florida FTZ No. 218 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 FTZ No. 250 maintains 0 subzones and serves 1 businesses. Staff continues to market the zone through business, which uses the Petroleum Products Terminal publications and educational workshops, and has begun Facility at the Orlando Sanford International Airport to promoting the FTZ to existing local businesses through store and distribute jet fuel to aircraft on the airfield. St. Lucie County’s Business Retention and Expansion As a result of the rise in the price of jet fuel, annual Program. volume and exports increased within the zone. The Sanford Airport Authority continues to partner with the FTZ No. 241 Fort Lauderdale City of Sanford and the Seminole County Chamber of (Port Everglades), Florida Commerce to market the zone. FTZ No. 241 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses.

No. 249 Pensacola, Florida FTZ No. 249 maintains 0 subzones and serves 1 business, the Mobile (Alabama) Foreign-Trade Zone Corporation that received and exported portable electrical power systems in the last fiscal year. In order to attract more firms to the zone, the Pensacola Marine Complex (PSMC) has been actively marketing a shallow draft marine terminal with the capabilities of handling international cargo imported or exported via sea-going barges and shallow draft vessels. Georgia

Foreign-Trade Zones: 3 Exports: $0.62 billion Active Firms: 50 Annual Volume: $3.57 billion Employment: 4,727 Active Subzones: 8

Georgia Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 26 Atlanta 4,208 3059.93 587.26 36 5 No. 104 Savannah 519 514.49 32.58 14 3 No. 144 Brunswick 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 3 4,727 3,574.41 619.84 50 8

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports $ millions (Georgia 2005-2006)

The volume of FTZ activity in Georgia increased 4000 2005 21.3% from $2.95 billion in 2005 to $3.57 billion in 3500 2006 2006. This increase is due to the higher price of jet fuel 3000 handled by FTZ No. 26. 2500 2000 Exports from Georgia FTZs increased 27.3% from 1500 $0.49 billion in 2005 to $0.62 billion in 2006. Exports 1000 of manufactured commodities from Georgia decreased 500 5.3% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* 0 Annual Volume Exports

Jobs associated with Georgia FTZs increased 3.4% over the past year, while total nonfarm employment in Employment Percentage Changes (Georgia 2005-2006) Georgia increased by 2.0%. 6.0%

5.0%

4.0% 3.4%

3.0%

2.0% 2.0%

1.0%

0.0% FTZ Employment State Employment

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Georgia Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 26 Atlanta, Georgia No. 104 Savannah, Georgia FTZ No. 26 maintains 5 subzones and serves 36 FTZ No. 104 maintains 3 subzones and serves 14 businesses, including Yamaha Motor Manufacturing businesses, including Merck Pharmaceuticals, CITGO Corporation, Delta Air Lines, and Siemens Energy Asphalt Refining, and Tumi, Inc. The zone employs & Automation. In addition to various items from 42 approximately 519 people. countries of origin, the GPZ also received foreign status No. 144 Brunswick, Georgia jet fuel via pipeline from other FTZs. Once again, the FTZ No. 144 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 substantial increase in annual volume is attributed to businesses. The Brunswick Foreign-Trade Zone, Inc. the higher cost of jet fuel. continues to market the zone by working closely with the Georgia Ports Authority. Hawaii

Foreign-Trade Zones: 1 Exports: $0.64 billion Active Firms: 373 Annual Volume: $4.38 billion Employment: 1,723 Active Subzones: 4

Hawaii Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 9 Honolulu 1,723 4,384.44 643.41 373 4 Total 1 1,723 4,384.44 643.41 373 4

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Hawaii 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Hawaii increased 5000 2005 33.5% from $3.28 billion in 2005 to $4.38 billion in 2006 4000 2006. This increase is due to a rise in petroleum prices, a larger number of firms served, and an increase in 3000 fueling activity. 2000

Exports from Hawaii FTZs increased 13.3% from 1000 $567.64 million in 2005 to $643.41 million in 2006. Exports of manufactured commodities from Hawaii 0 Annual Volume Exports decreased by 76.7% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* Employment Percentage Changes (Hawaii 2005-2006) Jobs associated with Hawaii FTZs decreased 3.7% 10.0% over the past year, falling to 1,723 in 2006. In contrast, total nonfarm employment in Hawaii increased by 2.1% 6.0% over the past fiscal year. 2.1% 2.0% FTZ Employment

State Employment -2.0%

Hawaii -3.7% Foreign-Trade Zones -6.0%

No. 9 Honolulu, Hawaii -10.0% FTZ No. 9 maintains 4 subzones and serves 373 Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of businesses. Subzone operators include Tesoro Hawaii Labor Statistics. Corporation and Chevron Corporation. While petroleum is a major part of zone activity, the FTZ program is focusing on helping Hawaiian manufacturers to be more competitive in external markets. As a result of promotional efforts, 95 new firms used the FTZ warehouse and distribution facility, fueling facilities, and facilities in 2006. The general purpose zone includes a food/beverage container manufacturing operations.

Idaho

Foreign-Trade Zones: 1 Exports: $0.00 billion Active Firms: 0 Annual Volume: $0.00 billion Employment: 0 Active Subzones: 0

Idaho Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 242 Boundary County (Eastport) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 1 0 0.00 0.00 0 0

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Idaho Foreign-Trade Zones The volume of FTZ activity in Idaho remained at zero. No. 242 Boundary County (Eastport), Idaho FTZ No. 242 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 Exports from Idaho FTZs remained at zero. businesses. Exports of manufactured commodities from Idaho increased by 7.0% during 2005-2006 calendar year.*

Jobs associated with Idaho FTZs remained at zero. Total nonfarm employment in Idaho increased by 3.6% over the past fiscal year.

Illinois

Foreign-Trade Zones: 8 Exports: $0.98 billion Active Firms: 59 Annual Volume: $18.24 billion Employment: 22,293 Active Subzones: 13

Illinois Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 22 Chicago 10,018 3,026.07 52.38 44 5 No. 31 Granite City 2,084 6,339.68 0.00 6 1 No. 114 Peoria 4,117 3,283.00 839.64 3 3 No. 133 Milan (Quad City) 1,204 87.02 16.34 1 1 No. 146 Lawrenceville (Evansville) 3,564 5,466.43 69.04 2 2 No. 176 Rockford 1,306 34.34 0.00 3 1 No. 245 Decatur (Peoria) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 271 Savanna 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 8 22,293 18,236.55 977.40 59 13

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports $ millions (Illinois 2005-2006) The volume of FTZ activity in Illinois increased 20000 2005 21.1% over the previous fiscal year due to the rise in the 2006 16000 price of crude oil and the inclusion in the report of FTZ activity in 114A. 12000

Exports from Illinois FTZs increased 223.8% over 8000 the previous fiscal year, also due to the inclusion of 4000 FTZ 114A. Exports of manufactured commodities from Illinois increased 36.2% during the 2005-2006 calendar 0 Annual Volume Exports year.* Employment Percentage Changes Jobs associated with Illinois FTZs increased 22.0% (Illinois 2005-2006) over the past year, while total nonfarm employment in 25.0% 22.0% Illinois increased by 1.0%. 20.0%

15.0%

10.0%

5.0% 1.0% 0.0% FTZ Employment State Employment

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Illinois Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 22 Chicago, Illinois No. 133 Milan (Quad-City), Illinois FTZ No. 22 maintains 5 subzones and serves 44 FTZ No. 133 maintains 1 subzone and serves 1 businesses, including Abbott Laboratories, Sanofi- business, Danzas AEI, owned by Deere & Company. Aventis, and BP Products of North America. Abbott Activity in the subzone includes manufacturing and Laboratories alone employs 9,500 persons, importing assembly operations for motor vehicles. raw materials and chemical intermediates for the No. 146 Lawrenceville (Evansville), Illinois production of intermediate and finished dosage FTZ No. 146 maintains 2 subzones and serves 2 pharmaceutical drugs within the zone. businesses: North American Lighting, Inc., which No. 31 Granite City, Illinois manufactures various types of automotive lighting FTZ No. 31 maintains 1 subzone and serves 6 devices within the zone and Marathon Ashland businesses. The bulk of the zone’s activity is conducted Petroleum, LLC, which operates the Robinson Refinery by ConocoPhilips Corporation, which is located in the and creates finished petroleum products. Annual volume subzone. The subzone consists of a fully integrated and exports increased due to the rise in oil prices crude oil refinery, a sulfur plant and a dock for shipping and accelerated refining activity by Marathon Ashland out various products. Operators in the general purpose Petroleum, LLC. zone provide storage space, conduct manipulations No. 176 Rockford, Illinois consisting of quality control inspections, and re-pack FTZ No. 176 maintains 1 subzone and serves 3 and clean merchandise for the domestic market. businesses. Zone activity decreased over the last year Annual volume and employment in the zone increased due to the decline in activity by Nissan Industrial Engine significantly in 2006. Manufacturing and Cardinal Health PTS, LLC. Activity in No. 114 Peoria, Illinois the zone includes pharmaceutical packaging and engine FTZ No. 114 maintains 3 subzones and serves 3 assembly. businesses. Caterpillar Inc. manufactures engines FTZ No. 245 Decatur, Illinois and engine components. Caterpillar’s activity was FTZ no. 245 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 not included in the NAFTZ’s 2005 state by state businesses. study, its inclusion is responsible for much of the increase in annual volume and exports in FTZ No. 114. FTZ No. 271 Savanna, Illinois DuPont Agricultural Products produces herbicides and FTZ no. 271 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 other related products, while Rockwell Automation businesses. manufactures control systems. Rockwell Automation’s expanding operations led to an increase in annual volume and exports in the FTZ. Indiana

Foreign-Trade Zones: 6 Exports: $0.48 billion Active Firms: 24 Annual Volume: $10.99 billion Employment: 12,701 Active Subzones: 10

Indiana Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 72 Indianapolis 3,755 3,065.82 182.26 13 6 No. 125 South Bend (Chicago) 102 110.91 1.30 3 1 No. 152 Burns Harbor (Chicago) 1,336 308.77 0.00 5 1 No. 170 Clark County (Louisville) 71 0.00 0.52 1 0 No. 177 Evansville 7,437 7,507.49 300.48 2 2 No. 182 Fort Wayne 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 6 12,701 10,992.99 484.56 24 10

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Indiana 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Indiana decreased 16000 2005 20.6% from $13.84 billion in 2005 to $10.99 billion in 2006 2006 due to the sharp decrease in annual volume of 12000 FTZ No. 152. 8000 Exports from Indiana FTZs increased by 1.2% from

$478.86 million in 2005 to $484.56 million in 2006. 4000 Exports of manufactured commodities from Indiana decreased 3.8% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* 0 Annual Volume Exports Jobs associated with Indiana FTZs increased 18.9% over the past year to 12,701 while total nonfarm Employment Percentage Changes (Indiana 2005-2006) employment in Indiana increased by 0.3%. 18.9% 20.0%

16.0%

12.0%

8.0%

4.0%

0.3% 0.0% FTZ Employment State Employment

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Indiana Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 72 Indianapolis, Indiana No. 170 Clark County, Indiana FTZ No. 72 maintains 6 subzones and serves 13 FTZ No. 170 maintains no subzones and serves 1 businesses, including Eli Lilly & Co., Subaru of Indiana, business, Eagle Steel Products, Inc., which is engaged Thomson Inc., and SMC Corporation of America. in inspecting and processing steel coils. While Subzone Although Subzone 72J de-activated, annual FTZ volume 170A is leased and operated by Lexmark International, increased mainly due to the rise in pharmaceutical Inc., it has not yet been activated due to continued manufacturing by Eli Lilly & Co. transitions in the facility.

No. 125 South Bend, Indiana No. 177 Evansville, Indiana FTZ No. 125 maintains 1 subzone and serves 3 FTZ No. 177 maintains 2 subzones and serves 2 businesses. Annual volume declined significantly businesses: Mead Johnson & Company (a subsidiary over the previous fiscal year due to a decrease in the of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company) and Toyota Motor movement of merchandise by Audiovox Specialized Manufacturing. Mead Johnson increased its production Applications, LLC. of pharmaceutical and nutritional products, and was thus responsible for the rise in annual volume in the zone. No. 152 Burns Harbor, Indiana A number of companies are also located in the general FTZ No. 152 maintains 1 subzone and serves 5 purpose site, though this area has yet to be activated. businesses, including Beta Steel Corporation and Federal Marine Terminals, Inc., though most activity No. 182 Fort Wayne, Indiana was accounted for by the Whiting Oil Refinery operations FTZ No. 182 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 of BP Amoco. However, annual volume decreased businesses. The City of Fort Wayne continues to dramatically in the FTZ, as BP Amoco’s production distribute information to northeast Indiana businesses fell with the de-activation of its subzone (152B) on about available business opportunities through the use July 1, 2006. of the Foreign-Trade Zone. Iowa

Foreign-Trade Zones: 3 Exports: $0.00 billion Active Firms: 1 Annual Volume: $0.55 billion Employment: 3,378 Active Subzones: 1

Iowa Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 107 Polk County (Des Moines) 3,378 547.68 0.00 1 1 No. 133 Davenport (Quad-City) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 176 Cedar Rapids 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 3 3,378 547.68 0.00 1 1

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Iowa 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Iowa decreased 20.0% 700 2005 from $648.87 million in 2005 to $547.68 million in 600 2006 2006. 500

400 Exports from Iowa FTZs decreased from $18.12 300 million in 2005 to $0.00 in 2006. Exports of 200 manufactured commodities from Iowa decreased 18.6% 100 during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* 0 Annual Volume Exports Jobs associated with Iowa FTZs dropped 3.8% over the past year to 3,378, while total nonfarm employment Employment Percentage Changes in Iowa increased by 1.7%. (Iowa 2005-2006)

10.0%

5.0% 1.7% FTZ Employment 0.0% State Employment

-5.0% -3.8%

-10.0%

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Iowa Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 107 Polk County (Des Moines), Iowa No. 133 Davenport (Quad-City), Iowa FTZ No. 107 maintains 1 subzone and serves 1 FTZ No. 133 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 business, Winnebago Industries, Inc., which produces businesses. motor homes. Chassis automotive components are No. 175 Cedar Rapids, Iowa imported from into the zone and used to FTZ No. 175 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 build more innovative vehicles. businesses. Kansas

Foreign-Trade Zones: 2 Exports: $7.26 million Active Firms: 13 Annual Volume: $118.45 million Employment: 421 Active Subzones: 1

Kansas Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 17 Kansas City 411 95.97 7.26 8 1 No. 161 Sedwick County 10 22.48 0.00 5 0 Total 2 421 118.45 7.26 13 1

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Kansas 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Kansas decreased 150 2005 11.7% from $134.2 million in 2005 to $118.5 million in 2006 2006. 120

Exports from Kansas FTZs increased by 115.4% 80 from $3.37 million in 2005 to $7.26 million in 2006. This is due to increased exports from Bayer HealthCare 40 LLC. Exports of manufactured commodities from Kansas increased 42.1% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* 0 Annual Volume Exports

Jobs associated with Kansas FTZs stayed steady at Employment Percentage Changes 421 over the past year while total nonfarm employment (Kansas 2005-2006) in Kansas increased by 0.7%. 5.0%

4.0% Kansas Foreign-Trade Zones 3.0% 2.0%

No. 17 Kansas City, Kansas 1.0% 0.7% 0.0% FTZ No. 17 maintains 1 subzone and serves 8 0.0% FTZ Employment State Employment businesses, including Bayer HealthCare LLC., which -1.0% accounts for most of the zone activity. The Animal Health -2.0% Division of Bayer HealthCare LLC, located in subzone Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of 17B is engaged in the development, production, and Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of sale of quality animal products and pesticides. Labor Statistics.

No. 161 Sedgwick County, Kansas FTZ No. 161 maintains 0 subzones and serves 5 businesses. The Sedgwick County Foreign-Trade Zone uses both mass marketing promotional efforts and one- on-one identification of potential candidates for the FTZ.

Kentucky

Foreign-Trade Zones: 2 Exports: $1.55 billion Active Firms: 19 Annual Volume: $19.52 billion Employment: 19,057 Active Subzones: 7

Kentucky Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 29 Jefferson County (Louisville) 17,242 9,782.64 572.81 17 5 No. 47 Campbell County (Cincinnati) 1,815 9739.10 972.90 2 2 Total 2 19,057 19,521.74 1,545.71 19 7

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Kentucky 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Kentucky increased 25000 17.2% from $16.65 billion in 2005 to $19.52 billion in 2005 2006 2006. 20000

15000 Exports from Kentucky FTZs increased by 22.6% from $1.26 billion in 2005 to $1.55 billion in 2006. The 10000 increase comes primarily from General Electric Engine 5000 Services Distribution and Toyota Motor Manufacturing, which raised their production levels. Exports of 0 Annual Volume Exports manufactured commodities from Kentucky increased 12.6% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* Employment Percentage Changes (Kentucky 2005-2006) Jobs associated with Kentucky FTZs increased 10.0% 4.7% over the past year to 19,057, while total nonfarm employment in Kentucky increased by 0.7%. 8.0%

6.0% 4.7%

4.0%

2.0% 0.7%

0.0% FTZ Employment State Employment

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Kentucky Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 29 Jefferson County (Louisville), Kentucky No. 47 Campbell County (Cincinnati), Kentucky FTZ No. 29 maintains 5 subzones and serves 17 FTZ No. 47 maintains 2 subzones and serves 2 businesses. Several companies including UPS Supply businesses: Marathon Ashland Petroleum, LLC and Chain Solutions, Marathon Petroleum Company, and General Electric Engine Services Distribution. Marathon Stride Rite Corporation significantly increased their Ashland Petroleum, LLC produces finished gasoline, jet activity. fuel, lubricating products, kerosene and solvents, and other petroleum and petrochemical products. Marathon has witnessed a large rise in the prices of its products. General Electric Engine Services Distribution, LLC warehouses, kits, and distributes parts and components for aircraft, industrial, and marine engines. Louisiana

Foreign-Trade Zones: 6 Exports: $1.09 billion Active Firms: 92 Annual Volume: $99.01 billion Employment: 22,018 Active Subzones: 16

Louisiana Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 2 New Orleans 7,646 8,360.61 181.96 80 5 No. 87 Calcasieu Parish (Lake Charles) 4,075 14,892.27 756.08 3 2 No. 124 Parishes (Gramercy) 8,297 58863.78 2.86 8 8 No. 145 Shreveport 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 154 Baton Rouge 2,000 16,897.00 152.00 1 1 No. 261 Alexandria 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 6 22,018 99,013.66 1,092.90 92 16

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Louisiana 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Louisiana increased 120000 2005 31.8% from $75.13 billion in 2005 to $99.01 billion in 100000 2006 2006. The increase in the value of annual volume and 80000 exports is due primarily to the large increase in the price of oil. 60000 40000 Exports from Louisiana FTZs increased by 75.1% 20000 from $624.1 million in 2005 to $1.09 billion in 2006. Exports of manufactured commodities from Louisiana 0 Annual Volume Exports decreased 16.4% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.*

Employment Percentage Changes Jobs associated with Louisiana FTZs decreased (Louisiana 2005-2006) 3.4% over the past year to 22,018, while total nonfarm 10.0% employment in Louisiana increased by 4.4%.

6.0% 4.4%

2.0% FTZ Employment

State Employment -2.0%

-3.4% -6.0%

-10.0%

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Louisiana Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 2 New Orleans, Louisiana No. 145 Shreveport, Louisiana FTZ No. 29 maintains 5 subzones and serves 80 FTZ No. 145 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. Several companies such as ConocoPhillips businesses. Company, Chalmette Refining LLC, and Murphy Oil USA, No. 154 Baton Rouge, Louisiana Inc. saw significant increases in activity. FTZ No. 154 maintains 1 subzone and serves 1 No. 87 Calcasieu Parish (Lake Charles), Louisiana business, the ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, which FTZ No. 87 maintains 2 subzones and serves 3 operates the second largest oil refinery and businesses, including ConocoPhillips and CITGO petrochemical complex in the United States. Annual Petroleum Corporation. Notably, total annual volume volume and exports have risen steadily. increased by approximately 45%. Meanwhile, total No. 261 Alexandria, Louisiana exports have almost tripled. The value of exports for FTZ No. 261 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 ConocoPhillips significantly increased from 15 million businesses. to over 381 million and its employment rose by almost 50%.

No. 124 St. Charles, St. John the Baptist, and St. James Parishes (Gramercy), Louisiana FTZ No. 124 maintains 8 subzones and serves 8 businesses. Five businesses are oil refineries and two are shipbuilding sites. The eighth business is a manufacturing facility for construction, fabrication, and repair of offshore floating and fixed oil drilling platforms and components. Employment in the zone went up by 1,467, while the value of annual volume has increased along with higher oil prices. Maine

Foreign-Trade Zones: 4 Exports: $0.00 billion Active Firms: 0 Annual Volume: $0.00 billion Employment: 0 Active Subzones: 0

Maine Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 58 Bangor 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 179 Madawaska 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 186 Waterville (Belfast) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 263 Lewiston 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 4 0 0.00 0.00 0 0

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Maine Foreign-Trade Zones The volume of FTZ activity in Maine remained at zero. No. 58 Bangor, Maine FTZ No. 58 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 Exports from Maine FTZs remained at zero. businesses. Exports of manufactured commodities from Maine decreased 8.1% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* No. 179 Madawaska, Maine FTZ No. 179 maintains an inactive subzone and serves Jobs associated with Maine FTZs remained at zero. 0 businesses. The zone is aggressively pursuing a Total nonfarm employment in Maine increased by 0.6%. marketing strategy that includes video presentations, speaking engagements, and efforts with the zone operator’s consultants to promote their FTZ advantages within their industry.

No. 186 Waterville (Belfast), Maine FTZ No. 186 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. Maine International Foreign-Trade Zone continues to market the zone and has received inquiries from potential zone users.

No. 263 Lewiston, Maine FTZ No. 263 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. The Lewiston-Auburn Economic Growth Council (LAEGC) has completed its second full year of FTZ operations. Although the grantee does not have an activated user, the zone’s designation continues to generate interest among Maine’s industrial base.

Maryland

Foreign-Trade Zones: 4 Exports: $15.51 million Active Firms: 93 Annual Volume: $826.98 million Employment: 291 Active Subzones: 0

Maryland Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 63 Prince George’s County 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 73 BWI Airport (Baltimore) 75 25.16 4.93 8 0 No. 74 Baltimore 216 801.81 10.58 85 0

No. 255 Washington County (Baltimore) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 4 291 826.98 15.51 93 0

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Maryland 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Maryland increased 900 2005 800 100.2% from $412.97 million in 2005 to $826.98 2006 million in 2006. This was due mainly to an increase in 700 600 activities at the Port of Baltimore, Zone No. 74. 500 400 Exports from Maryland FTZs decreased by 66.1% 300 from $45.71 million in 2005 to $15.51 million in 2006. 200 Exports of manufactured commodities from Maryland 100 0 increased 0.4% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* Annual Volume Exports

Jobs associated with Maryland FTZs decreased Employment Percentage Changes 31.4% over the past year to 291, while total nonfarm (Maryland 2005-2006) employment in Maryland increased by 1.2%. 20.0%

10.0% FTZ Employment 1.2% 0.0% State Employment -10.0%

-20.0%

-30.0% -31.4% -40.0%

-50.0%

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Maryland Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 63 Prince George’s County, Maryland No. 74 Baltimore, Maryland FTZ No. 63 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 FTZ No. 74 maintains 0 subzones and serves 85 businesses. businesses. During the past fiscal year, there has been a strong increase in annual volume due to increased No. 73 BWI Airport (Baltimore), Maryland marketing efforts that brought in 11 new firms into the FTZ No. 73 maintains 0 subzones and serves 8 FTZ. While some firms use the zone for the storage businesses. The primary general purpose zone operator, of metals as part of the London Exchange Metal Belt’s Corporation, saw a slight increase in general (LME) business operations, other users have pursued receipts and storage for tobacco, while value-added value-added activities, such as accessorizing trucks, packaging volumes remained consistent with 2005 steel inspection, steel coil processing, and steel coil volumes. While the Northrop Grumman Corporation is wrapping. the official operator of Subzone 73B, the firm had no FTZ activity during this reporting period. No. 255 Washington County (Baltimore), Maryland FTZ No. 255 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. The Foreign-Trade Zone Commission for Washington County, Maryland, continues to prepare for site activation. Massachusetts

Foreign-Trade Zones: 3 Exports: $0.20 billion Active Firms: 21 Annual Volume: $1.22 billion Employment: 1,701 Active Subzones: 4

Massachusetts Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 27 Boston 1,251 1136.93 197.21 19 3 No. 28 New Bedford 400 57.35 0.38 1 1 No. 201 Holyoke (Springfield) 50 24.70 0.81 1 0 Total 3 1,701 1,218.98 198.40 21 4

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Massachusetts 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Massachusetts 1400 increased 23.6% from $985.95 million in 2005 to 2005 1200 2006

$1,218.98 million in 2006, due to activity increases in 1000 all three FTZs. 800

Exports from Massachusetts FTZs increased by 600 41.6% from $140.07 million in 2005 to $198.40 million 400 in 2006. This is primarily due to the rise in exports in 200 FTZ No. 27. Exports of manufactured commodities from 0 Annual Volume Exports Massachusetts increased 13.8% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* Employment Percentage Changes (Massachusetts 2005-2006) Jobs associated with Massachusetts FTZs 50.0% increased 28.1% over the past year to 1,701, while total nonfarm employment in Massachusetts increased 40.0%

0.7%. 28.1% 30.0%

20.0%

10.0%

0.7% 0.0% FTZ Employment State Employment

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Massachusetts Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 27 Boston, Massachusetts No. 28 New Bedford, Massachusetts FTZ No. 27 maintains 3 subzones and serves 19 FTZ No. 28 maintains 1 subzone and serves 1 business, businesses, including Polaroid, AstraZeneca, and the , which operates subzone 28F. International Ltd. Both annual volume and Subzone 28F was approved in June 2004, but began exports increased in the general purpose zone due operations in FY 2006. The Acushnet Company is to the rise in imports of jet fuel and footwear through a sporting goods company focusing on golf-related the local ports. Boston Logan International Airport’s products. passenger volumes increased in FY 2006 and footwear No. 201 Holyoke (Springfield), Massachusetts manufacturers benefited from a shift in ocean cargo FTZ No. 201 maintains 0 subzones and serves 1 routes. AstraZeneca’s annual volume decreased sharply business, Reebok International Ltd., which uses the in 2006. One of the materials AstraZeneca received in zone for footwear distribution. A subzone application for subzone 27L in 2005 was NXY-059, which was in its the HEDIC and Hazen Paper Company was approved in clinical trial stage. AstraZeneca eventually decided not to October 2004, but activation has been delayed due to a continue to import the material after receiving the study change in business plans. results, leading to the decline in annual volume. Michigan

Foreign-Trade Zones: 6 Exports: $0.43 billion Active Firms: 68 Annual Volume: $8.56 billion Employment: 11,639 Active Subzones: 5

Michigan Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 16 Sault St. Marie 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 43 Battle Creek 2,812 408.02 24.01 4 2 No. 70 Detroit 8,671 8148.55 406.85 61 3 No. 140 Flint (Saginaw/Bay City/Flint) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 189 Grand Rapids 6 0.05 0.00 2 0

No. 210 St. Clair County (Port Huron) 150 2.69 0.58 1 0 Total 6 11,639 8,559.31 431.44 68 5

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Michigan 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Michigan increased 9000 2005 41.7% from $6.04 billion in 2005 to $8.56 billion in 8000 2006 2006. This substantial increase is due to the higher 7000 6000 price of oil and the expansion of production activities 5000 in FTZ No. 70. 4000 3000 Exports from Michigan FTZs increased by 45.3% 2000 from $297.02 million in 2005 to $431.44 million in 1000 2006, due to higher oil prices and increased exports 0 Annual Volume Exports from FTZ No. 70. Exports of manufactured commodities from Michigan increased 65.7% during the 2005-2006 Employment Percentage Changes calendar year.* (Michigan 2005-2006)

Jobs associated with Michigan FTZs increased 28.0%

21.0% over the past year to 11,639, while total nonfarm 21.0% employment in Michigan decreased 0.6%. 18.0%

8.0%

-0.6%

-2.0% FTZ Employment State Employment

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Michigan Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 16 Sault St. Marie, Michigan No. 140 Flint (Saginaw/Bay City/Flint), Michigan FTZ No. 16 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 FTZ No. 140 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. On May 31, 2006, the FTZ Board approved businesses. The Genesee Regional Chamber of a subzone for magnesium and aluminum diecasting at Commerce is working with local companies to market Northern Imports, LLC. No zone activity has taken place the FTZ. Additionally, the grantee is working to re-activate in the subzone yet. FTZ No. 140A.

No. 43 Battle Creek, Michigan No. 189 Kent/Ottawa/Muskegon Counties FTZ No. 43 maintains 2 subzones and serves 4 (Grand Rapids), Michigan businesses, including Mead Johnson & Company, FTZ No. 189 maintains 0 subzones and serves 2 Abbott Laboratories, and Perrigo Company, which are businesses. Zone activity in 2006 was minimal. Sunhill all pharmaceutical manufacturers. Pfizer Inc. received a America LLC is the largest user of the zone - it receives grant of authority to operate a subzone on September products from China, which are sorted and stored in the 18, 2006 but did not record any activity. FTZ. The grantee, along with the Van Andel Global Trade Center, local U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) No. 70 Detroit, Michigan brokers, and economic development groups, continues FTZ No. 70 maintains 3 subzones and serves 61 to market the FTZ. businesses, though AutoAlliance International, Inc. and Marathon Petroleum Company are responsible for No. 210 St. Clair County (Port Huron), Michigan most of the zone’s activity. The value of exports from FTZ No. 210 maintains 0 subzones and serves the general purpose zone rose again in 2006. The FTZ 1 business, Cross Huller-North America which activities of three new FTZ No. 70 operators, Michelin manufactures metal working equipment. The grantee North America, Inc., Empire Electronics, Inc., and BP actively promotes the zone with local manufacturing North America, Inc. added significant volumes to the companies each year. GPZ’s overall business in 2006. Minnesota

Foreign-Trade Zones: 3 Exports: $0.00 million Active Firms: 27 Annual Volume: $556.85 million Employment: 184 Active Subzones: 1

Minnesota Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 51 Duluth 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 119 Minneapolis (St. Paul) 184 556.85 0.00 27 1 No. 259 Koochiching County 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 3 184 556.85 0.00 27 1

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports $ millions (Minnesota 2005-2006) The volume of FTZ activity in Minnesota decreased 700 2005 8.4% from $608.20 million in 2005 to $556.85 million 600 2006 in 2006 due to a decrease in the number of active firms. 500

400 Exports from Minnesota FTZs decreased to $0.00 300 million. Exports of manufactured commodities from 200 Minnesota increased 23.4% during the 2005-2006 100 calendar year.* 0 Annual Volume Exports Jobs associated with Minnesota FTZs declined 1.1% to 184, while total nonfarm employment in Minnesota increased 2.0%. Employment Percentage Changes (Minnesota 2005-2006)

8.0%

6.0%

4.0%

2.0% 2.0% FTZ Employment 0.0% State Employment

-2.0% -1.1%

-4.0%

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Minnesota Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 51 Duluth, Minnesota No. 259 Koochiching County FTZ No. 51 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 FTZ No. 259 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. businesses. Statistics for FTZ No. 259 were unavailable for FY 2006. No. 119 Minneapolis – St. Paul, Minnesota FTZ No. 119 maintains 1 subzone and serves 27 businesses, including a fuel farm, a crankshaft inspection operation, and Wirsbo Company which manufactures plastic tubing. The zone has witnessed a steady decrease in the number of businesses served over the last two years. Mississippi

Foreign-Trade Zones: 3 Exports: $0.96 billion Active Firms: 15 Annual Volume: $11.22 billion Employment: 10,340 Active Subzones: 6

Mississippi Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 92 Harrison County (Gulfport) 5,176 7,774.95 743.65 5 4 No. 158 Greater Mississippi FTZ (see reverse) 5,079 3,159.27 205.80 2 2 No. 262 Northern Mississippi (South Haven) 85 287.76 6.41 8 0 Total 3 10,340 11,221.97 955.86 15 6

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Mississippi 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Mississippi increased 12000 2005 9.7% from $10.23 billion in 2005 to $11.22 billion in 10000 2006 2006, pursuant to the expanded operations of Nissan 8000 North America in FTZ No. 158 and the higher cost of oil. Additionally, Fiscal Year 2006 marked the first full year of 6000 zone operations for FTZ No. 262. 4000

Exports from Mississippi FTZs increased by 47.8% 2000 from $646.72 million in 2005 to $955.86 million in 0 Annual Volume Exports 2006. Exports of manufactured commodities from Mississippi decreased 6.0% during the 2005-2006 Employment Percentage Changes calendar year.* (Mississippi 2005-2006)

10.0% Jobs associated with Mississippi FTZs decreased

12.5% over the past year to 10,340, while total nonfarm 5.0% 2.2% employment in Mississippi increased by 2.2%. FTZ Employment 0.0% State Employment

-5.0%

-10.0%

-12.5% -15.0%

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Mississippi Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 92 Harrison County (Gulfport), Mississippi No. 262 Northern Mississippi FTZ No. 92 maintains 4 subzones and serves 5 (Southaven), Mississippi businesses. The operations of Chevron account for FTZ No. 262 maintains 0 subzones and serves a large part of the zone’s activity, employing 2,077 8 businesses. The two most active firms, Kenco people, and Northrop Grumman Ship Systems employs Group, Inc. and Conair Corporation use the zone for approximately 1,300 persons in shipbuilding. On August warehousing and distribution operations of consumer 29, 2005, Hurricane Katrina inflicted severe damage electronic items. Several new distribution facilities began upon a number of zone and subzone facilities. Rebuilding construction or were completed during the last fiscal and restoration efforts continued in FY 2006. year in order to accommodate demand for the general purpose foreign-trade zone space. No. 158 Greater Mississippi Foreign-Trade Zone (Jackson, Tupelo, Vicksburg), Mississippi FTZ No. 158 maintains 2 subzones and serves 2 businesses: Alliant TechSystems and Nissan North America. The GPZ facilities operated by Lane Furniture Industries were approved for activation at the end of August 2006. Missouri

Foreign-Trade Zones: 3 Exports: $0.20 billion Active Firms: 23 Annual Volume: $0.90 billion Employment: 2,305 Active Subzones: 6

Missouri Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 15 Kansas City 2,171 754.12 170.31 8 5 No. 102 St. Louis 134 148.43 32.32 15 1 No. 225 Springfield 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 3 2,305 902.54 202.62 23 6

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Missouri 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Missouri increased 1000 2005 3.7% from $870.03 million in 2005 to $902.54 million 2006 800 in 2006, due largely to an increase in production by Bayer CropScience. 600

Exports from Missouri FTZs increased by 11.9% 400

from $181.06 million in 2005 to $202.62 million in 200 2006, due primarily to the expansion of activity by Bayer CropScience. Exports of manufactured commodities 0 Annual Volume Exports from Missouri increased 21.0% during the 2005-2006

calendar year.* Employment Percentage Changes (Missouri 2005-2006) Jobs associated with Missouri FTZs decreased 10.0% 6.2% over the past year to 2,305, while total nonfarm employment in Missouri increased by 0.5%. 5.0% FTZ Employment 0.5% 0.0% State Employment -5.0%

-6.2% -10.0%

-15.0%

-20.0%

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Missouri Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 15 Kansas City, Missouri No. 102 St. Louis, Missouri FTZ No. 15 maintains 5 subzones and serves 8 FTZ No. 102 maintains 1 subzone and serves 15 businesses, including Ford Ortech Company, Bayer businesses. The FTZ Board approved a boundary CropScience, Kawasaki, and most recently Pfizer. modification on April 24, 2006, which allowed the GPZ Annual volume and exports increased in FTZ No. 15 in site to activate. FTZ No. 102 experienced an increase in 2006. Bayer increased its level of activity for products shipments to the GPZ - the total value of merchandise produced solely for export. Since March 2005, Pfizer has increased from $0 in 2005 to $.5 million in 2006. been producing Revolution/Stronghold at its subzone. No. 225 Springfield, Missouri FTZ No. 225 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. Montana

Foreign-Trade Zones: 2 Exports: $0.00 billion Active Firms: 0 Annual Volume: $0.00 billion Employment: 0 Active Subzones: 0

Montana Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 88 Great Falls 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 187 Toole County (Sweetgrass) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 2 0 0.00 0.00 0 0

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Montana Foreign-Trade Zones The volume of FTZ activity in Montana remained at zero. No. 88 Great Falls, Montana FTZ No. 88 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 Exports from Montana FTZs remained at zero. businesses. The State of Montana, Great Falls Exports of manufactured commodities from Montana Development Authority, and the Great Falls International increased 30.0% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* Airport Authority continue to actively promote the zone. Jobs associated with Montana FTZs remained No. 187 Toole County (Sweetgrass), Montana at zero. Total nonfarm employment in Montana FTZ No. 187 maintains 0 subzones and serves increased by 4.1%. 0 businesses. FY 2006 data for FTZ No. 187 is unavailable.

Nebraska

Foreign-Trade Zones: 2 Exports: $95.48 million Active Firms: 2 Annual Volume: $456.03 million Employment: 1,922 Active Subzones: 2

Nebraska Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 19 Omaha 68 5.12 17.76 1 1 No. 59 Lincoln 1,854 450.91 77.72 1 1 Total 2 1,922 456.03 95.48 2 2

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Nebraska 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Nebraska decreased 700 2005 25.9% from $615.22 million in 2005 to $456.03 million 600 2006 in 2006. 500

400 Exports from Nebraska FTZs decreased by 3.3% 300 from $98.69 million in 2005 to $95.48 million in 2006. 200 Exports of manufactured commodities from Nebraska 100 increased 2.5% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* 0 Annual Volume Exports Jobs associated with Nebraska FTZs decreased 2.4% over the past year to 1,922. Total nonfarm Employment Percentage Changes employment in Nebraska increased by 1.4%. (Nebraska 2005-2006)

10.0%

7.5%

5.0% 1.4% 2.5% FTZ Employment 0.0% State Employment -2.5% -2.4% -5.0%

-7.5%

-10.0%

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Nebraska Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 19 Omaha, Nebraska No. 59 Lincoln, Nebraska FTZ No. 19 maintains 1 subzone and serves 1 FTZ No. 59 maintains 1 subzone and serves 1 business, business, Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. FTZ activities Kawasaki Motors Manufacturing USA (KMM), which include repackaging, warehousing, and distribution of manufactures recreational vehicles and industrial agricultural chemical products. General purpose zone robots under zone procedures. Production at KMM 19 was activated at the end of August 2006. The decreased 9.1% from FY 2005. The general purpose Greater Omaha Chamber of Commerce is pursuing an zone was inactive during FY 2006, but information aggressive marketing strategy to bring in local, national, on zone availability is used as part of local economic and international users to the GPZ. development marketing efforts. Nevada

Foreign-Trade Zones: 2 Exports: $19.88 million Active Firms: 73 Annual Volume: $1.41 billion Employment: 492 Active Subzones: 1

Nevada Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 89 Clark County (Las Vegas) 425 654.13 17.51 68 0 No. 126 Sparks (Reno) 67 751.71 2.37 5 1 Total 2 492 1,405.84 19.88 73 1

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Nevada 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Nevada increased 1600 2005 62.2% from $866.97 million in 2005 to $1,405.84 2006 million in 2006. The two FTZs are used for storage and 1200 distribution of a variety of products. The number of businesses served increased, as did the level of current 800 activity within the foreign-trade zone. 400 Exports from Nevada FTZs increased by 239.8% from $5.85 million in 2005 to $19.88 million in 2006. 0 Annual Volume Exports Exports of manufactured commodities from Nevada increased 5.8% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* Employment Percentage Changes (Nevada 2005-2006) Jobs associated with Nevada FTZs increased 90.7% 100.0% over the past year to 492. Total nonfarm employment in 90.7%

Nevada increased 4.4%. 80.0%

60.0%

40.0%

20.0% 4.4% 0.0% FTZ Employment State Employment

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Nevada Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 89 Clark County (Las Vegas), Nevada No. 126 Sparks (Reno), Nevada FTZ No. 89 maintains 0 subzones and serves FTZ No. 126 maintains 1 subzone and serves 5 68 businesses. The prime areas of export and businesses. The FTZ provides storage, testing, transshipment in the zone are liquor, electronics, inspection, packing, distribution and administration for gaming devices, clothing, convention materials, and foreign-made goods held in activated space prior to and photographic equipment and supplies. No manufacturing after entry into U.S. commerce. Manufacturing authority was conducted within the zone; however, assembly was given to MNA in late August 2006. In addition, Taiyo operations increased in FY 2006. Annual volume America Inc., conducts manufacturing in its subzone. increased significantly as a result of several years of intense targeted marketing. New Hampshire

Foreign-Trade Zones: 1 Exports: $4.68 million Active Firms: 3 Annual Volume: $216.77 million Employment: 933 Active Subzones: 2

New Hampshire Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 81 Portsmouth 933 216.77 4.68 3 2 Total 1 933 216.77 4.68 3 2

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (New Hampshire 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in New Hampshire 250 2005 increased 64.8% from $131.53 million in 2005 to 2006 200 $216.77 million in 2006. This increase occurred primarily due to the activation of subzone 81D. 150

100 Exports from New Hampshire FTZs decreased by

31.2%, from $6.8 million in 2005 to 4.68 in 2006. 50 Exports of manufactured commodities from New 0 Hampshire increased 22.6% during the 2005-2006 Annual Volume Exports calendar year.*

Employment Percentage Changes Jobs associated with New Hampshire FTZs (New Hampshire 2005-2006) increased by 189.8%, to 933 in 2006 due to the 200.0% 189.8% activation of subzone 81D, while total nonfarm employment in New Hampshire increased by 1.0%. 150.0%

100.0% New Hampshire Foreign-Trade Zones 50.0%

1.0% No. 81 Portsmouth, New Hampshire 0.0% FTZ No. 81 maintains 2 subzones and serves 3 FTZ Employment State Employment businesses: Ecco USA , Millipore, and Westinghouse Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Electric Co. LLC. Millipore was activated on October Labor Statistics. 31, 2005, and its operations include the processing, manufacturing, and warehousing of “Durapore rolls.” Westinghouse engages in the manufacture, assembly, and testing of key components used in commercial nuclear power plants. Ecco uses the GPZ to distribute finished footwear.

New Jersey

Foreign-Trade Zones: 5 Exports: $0.20 billion Active Firms: 27 Annual Volume: $21.13 billion Employment: 15,209 Active Subzones: 13

New Jersey Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 44 Morris County 2,875 903.37 26.45 6 2 No. 49 Newark/Elizabeth 9,912 10,672.06 123.10 17 7 No. 142 Salem/Millville 2,292 9,258.39 48.28 3 3 No. 200 Mercer County 130 299.10 4.21 1 1 No. 235 Lakewood 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 5 15,209 21,132.92 202.04 27 13

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (New Jersey 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in New Jersey increased 25000 2005 27.2% from $16.62 billion in 2005 to $21.13 billion in 2006 20000 2006. This increase is due to the higher price of oil and the rise in oil refining activity experienced by FTZs No. 49 15000 and No. 142. 10000 Exports from New Jersey FTZs increased by 63.0% 5000 due largely to the Citgo Asphalt Refining Company’s higher export levels in FTZ No. 142. Exports of 0 Annual Volume Exports manufactured commodities from New Jersey increased 52.2% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* Employment Percentage Changes (New Jersey 2005-2006) Jobs associated with New Jersey FTZs increased 50.0% 24.8% to 15,209, while total nonfarm employment in

New Jersey increased by 0.6%. 40.0%

30.0% 24.8%

20.0%

10.0%

0.6% 0.0% FTZ Employment State Employment

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. New Jersey Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 44 Morris County (New York City), New Jersey No. 142, Salem/Millville (Philadelphia), New Jersey FTZ No. 44 maintains 2 subzones and serves 6 FTZ No. 142 maintains 3 subzones and serves 3 businesses. There are 4 businesses in the general businesses, which are all subzone oil refineries: Valero purpose zone: BMW of North America, LLC, Quest, Refining Company, Citgo Asphalt Refining Company, and Givaudan, and Crate & Barrel. Zone activities Sunoco Inc. Both volume and exports from the zone include automotive parts distribution, manufacturing increased dramatically due to increases in activity and of fragrance/flavor compounds, and the storage, oil prices. Marketing efforts aimed at activating the packaging, assembly, and distribution of home general purpose zone continue. furnishings. International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. and No. 200 Mercer County L’Oreal operate subzones in FTZ No. 44. Tiffany & Co. (Consolidated Philadelphia), New Jersey is working to activate its site and anticipates receiving FTZ No. 200 maintains 1 subzone and serves 1 products as part of official zone status in 2007. business, Mercedes-Benz USA (MBUSA). The Regional No. 49 Newark/Elizabeth Master Parts Distribution Center built by MBUSA (New York City), New Jersey in subzone 4A will replace the Baltimore Parts FTZ No. 49 maintains 7 subzones and serves 17 Distribution Center functions and will store parts for businesses. Export activity in the general purpose zone the replenishment of Mercedes-Benz parts distribution surged by 70% due to the growth in Citrus Products centers throughout the country. Inc.’s exports. BMW of North America, LLC and Mazda No. 235 Lakewood Motor of North America, Inc., both experienced an (Consolidated Philadelphia), New Jersey increase in foreign merchandise received. Subzone FTZ No. 235 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 activities include manufacturing of pharmaceuticals, businesses. special chemicals, flavor and fragrance products, as well as oil refining. The zone operator continues to pursue a wide range of marketing efforts to attract more businesses to the GPZ. New Mexico

Foreign-Trade Zones: 3 Exports: $24.94 million Active Firms: 1 Annual Volume: $23.57 million Employment: 30 Active Subzones: 0

New Mexico Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 110 Albuquerque 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 197 Dona Ana County (Las Cruces) 30 23.57 24.94 1 0 No. 256 Roswell 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 3 30 23.57 24.94 1 0

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (New Mexico 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in New Mexico increased 30 2005 2006 186.0% from $8.24 million in 2005 to $23.57 million in 25 2006 due to the activation of FTZ No. 197. 20

Exports from New Mexico FTZs increased by 15

3316.4%; however, this is due to abnormally low export 10 values from the previous two fiscal years, (where exports 5 were less than $1 million for each year). Exports of 0 manufactured commodities from New Mexico increased Annual Volume Exports 10.5% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.*

Employment Percentage Changes Jobs associated with New Mexico FTZs decreased (New Mexico 2005-2006) 96.2% to 30, while total nonfarm employment in New FTZ Employment 2.6% Mexico increased by 2.6%. 0.0% State Employment

-50.0%

-100.0% -96.2%

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. New Mexico Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 110 Albuquerque, New Mexico No. 197 Dona Ana County FTZ No. 110 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 (Les Cruces), New Mexico businesses. Although there was no activity in FTZ No. FTZ No. 197 maintains 0 subzones and serves 1 110 during the past fiscal year, Cardinal Health is still business, Siemens VDO Automotive, which began the operator of Subzone 110A and continues to seek operating during the last fiscal year. Siemens uses the opportunities for future imports of raw materials in the zone only for distribution purposes of automotive parts. production of pharmaceutical products. No. 256 Roswell, New Mexico FTZ No. 256 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. New York

Foreign-Trade Zones: 13 Exports: $63.87 million Active Firms: 120 Annual Volume: $863.44 million Employment: 2,448 Active Subzones: 5

New York Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 1 New York City 28 0.45 0.12 10 0 No. 23 Buffalo (Buffalo-Niagara Falls) 9 28.35 14.18 12 0 No. 34 Niagara County 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 37 Orange County (New York City) 40 3.94 0.00 2 0 No. 52 Suffolk County (New York City) 542 63.85 18.90 31 1 No. 54 Clinton County (Plattsburgh) 27 2.19 1.97 4 0 No. 90 Onondaga County (Syracuse) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 109 Jefferson County (Alexandria Bay) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 111 JFK International Airport (New York City) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 118 Ogdensburg 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 121 Albany 312 13.85 14.13 1 1 No. 141 Monroe County (Rochester) 1,358 638.26 10.07 59 2 No. 172 Oneida County (Utica) 132 112.54 4.50 1 1 Total 13 2,448 863.44 63.87 120 5

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (New York 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in New York increased 1000 2005 175.3% from $313.64 million in 2005 to $863.44 2006 800 million in 2006 primarily due to the increase in activity within FTZ No. 141. 600

Exports from New York FTZs increased by 2.0% 400 from $62.64 million in 2005 to $63.87 million in 2006. 200 Exports of manufactured commodities from New York 0 increased 21.1% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* Annual Volume Exports Zone Development Employment Percentage Changes (New York 2005-2006)

Jobs associated with New York FTZs increased 5.0% 20.0% to 2,448, while total nonfarm employment in New York increased by 0.8%. 15.0%

10.0%

5.0% 5.0%

0.8% 0.0% FTZ Employment State Employment

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

New York Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 1 New York City, New York No. 52 Suffolk County (New York City), New York FTZ No. 1 maintains 0 subzones and serves 10 FTZ No. 52 maintains 1 subzone and serves 31 businesses. Zone activities include general warehousing, businesses, one more than in the previous fiscal year. and repacking and remarking of toiletries and Annual volume has increased primarily due to the rise pharmaceuticals. The zone has experienced a decrease in activity of the Festo Corporation, which manufactures in annual volume, exports, and employment over the pneumatic and electronic components as well as past year. The zone continues to advertise in trade controls for industrial automation. Business activity journals, websites, and promotes business opportunities within the GPZ includes electronic component assembly, at the local and national levels. vehicle EPA testing and parts manufacturing, liquor and wine warehousing for the airline industry, and packaging. No. 23 Buffalo (Buffalo – Niagara Falls), New York FTZ No. 23 maintains 0 subzones and serves 12 No. 54 Clinton County businesses. Annual volume and exports increased (Plattsburgh), New York slightly over the previous year as there was a higher FTZ No. 54 maintains 0 subzones and serves 4 demand for various products from Asia and South businesses including UPS Supply Chain Solutions and America while the import and distribution of tobacco and World Warehouse and Distribution, which primarily stores alcohol products, which account for most of the activity and distributes cigarettes and clothing. While there were within the zone, remained steady. The zone continues slight decreases in annual volume and employment, to market its services through post cards and trade exports in the zone increased over the last fiscal year. organizations. The FTZ will continue to recruit companies that are already established within zone sites and urge them to No. 34 Niagara County, New York become activated in the zone. FTZ No. 34 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. No. 90 Onondaga County (Syracuse), New York FTZ No. 90 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 No. 37 Orange County (New York City), New York businesses. FTZ No. 37 maintains 0 subzones and serves 2 businesses. The zone experienced a large increase in No. 109 Jefferson County annual volume due to higher levels of production by (Alexandria Bay), New York Konica Minolta, which manufactures and distributes FTZ No. 109 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 copier and printer cartridges using imported toner, businesses. plastic bottles, and caps. New York Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 111 JFK International Airport No. 141 Monroe County (Rochester), New York (New York City), New York FTZ No. 141 maintains 2 subzones and serves 59 FTZ No. 111 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses, including British Airways, Eastman Kodak businesses. Company, and Xerox Corporation. Kodak imported a large amount of materials and finished products, which No. 118 Ogdensburg, New York accounted for the tremendous increase in annual volume FTZ No. 118 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 within the zone compared to the previous fiscal year. businesses. Meanwhile, Xerox Corporation’s increased production No. 121 Albany, New York of office printers and copiers led to a significant rise in FTZ No. 121 maintains 1 subzone and serves 1 employment within the zone. Marketing efforts continue business, Organichem Corporation. Organichem to improve with a greater internet presence, updated manufactures and distributes bulk pharmaceutical brochures, and other printed marketing materials. chemicals, which consists of processing chemicals into No. 172 Oneida County (Utica), New York more advanced chemical states, some of which are FTZ No. 172 maintains 1 subzone and serves 1 finished products while others become intermediate business, Oneida Ltd. Although Oneida has ceased its products for further processing at other facilities. No manufacturing activities in the zone, it continues to merchandise was received or forwarded out of the GPZ. utilize the subzone as a distribution center for a variety The reduction or elimination of tariffs on many items has of products. Its warehousing and distribution activities made it difficult to promote the benefits of the FTZ. contributed to a 60% rise in annual volume for the zone. Marketing efforts continue to promote all five industrial parks in the FTZ.

North Carolina

Foreign-Trade Zones: 6 Exports: $124.26 million Active Firms: 8 Annual Volume: $849.23 million Employment: 8,644 Active Subzones: 4

North Carolina Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 57 Mecklenburg County (Charlotte) 110 406.65 0.00 1 1 No. 66 Wilmington 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 67 Morehead City 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 93 Raleigh/Durham (Durham) 2,201 14.43 1.46 4 1 No. 214 Lenoir County 1,622 116.57 0.05 1 1 No. 230 Winston-Salem 4,711 311.59 122.75 2 1 Total 6 8,644 849.23 124.26 8 4

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (North Carolina 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in North Carolina 900 2005 800 increased 122.7% from $381.37 million in 2005 2006 to $849.23 million in 2006. Zones across the board 700 600 witnessed increases due to the activation of new users 500 and development of new product lines by existing users. 400 300 Exports from North Carolina FTZs increased 71.8% 200 from $72.34 million in 2005 to $124.26 million in 100 0 2006. Exports increased primarily due to expansion Annual Volume Exports of activity in FTZ No. 230. Exports of manufactured commodities from North Carolina increased 5.6% during Employment Percentage Changes the 2005-2006 calendar year.* (North Carolina 2005-2006) 188.2% 200.0% Jobs associated with North Carolina FTZs increased 188.2% over the past year, reaching 8,644 in 2006. 150.0% Total nonfarm employment in North Carolina increased by 1.6% over the past fiscal year. 100.0%

50.0%

1.6% 0.0% FTZ Employment State Employment

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. North Carolina Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 57 Mecklenburg County No. 214 Lenoir County (Charlotte), North Carolina (Beaufort-Morehead County), North Carolina FTZ No. 57 maintains 1 subzone and serves 1 business: FTZ No. 214 maintains 1 subzone and serves 1 Black & Decker, (U.S.), Inc. There was no foreign-trade business, Consolidated Diesel Company (CDC). zone activity in the general purpose zone this year. CDC produces engines in the subzone. Longistics Annual volume dropped in the zone from the previous International LLC is working to activate Site 1 - there are year, partially because Volvo is no longer operating in plans to activate the site in the second quarter of 2007. the zone. Kanban Logistics, the operator for Site 2, continues marketing efforts to activate its site. No. 66 Wilmington, North Carolina FTZ No. 66 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 No. 230 Guilford, Forsyth, Davidson and Sury businesses. The zone continues to educate potential Counties (Winston-Salem), North Carolina users to promote and market its zone. A regional FTZ FTZ No. 230 maintains 1 subzone and serves 2 brochure is being prepared by the North Carolina Global businesses. Employment, exports, and annual volume TransPark. continued to increase in 2006 as a result of a new user in the GPZ in September 2005. The grantee filed for No. 67 Morehead City an expansion and reorganization of FTZ No. 230 in the (Beaufort-Morehead County), North Carolina spring of 2006 to extend services to parts of the region FTZ No. 67 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 that are growing economically. Zone activity includes businesses. Marketing and recruitment efforts continue production of aluminum electrolytic capacitors by to promote the use of the zone. United Chemi-Con and manufacturing of automatic teller No. 93 Raleigh/Durham (Durham), North Carolina machines by Diebold Incorporated. United Chemi-Con FTZ No. 93 maintains 1 subzone and serves 4 had a slight increase in volume and exports in 2006. businesses. Merck & Co. Inc.’s subzone had limited activation in 2006 and Revlon activated its subzone in July 2006. Under the Research Triangle Regional Partnerships, the World Trade Center re-emerged. Additionally, the North Carolina China Center opened in February 2006. Both facilities should help to attract business to the area. North Dakota

Foreign-Trade Zones: 2 Exports: $0.36 million Active Firms: 1 Annual Volume: $0.97 million Employment: 400 Active Subzones: 1

North Dakota Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 103 Grand Forks (Pembina) 400 0.97 0.36 1 1 No. 267 Fargo 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 2 400 0.97 0.36 1 1

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (North Dakota 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in North Dakota 1.8 2005 1.6 decreased 38.2% from $1.57 million in 2005 to $0.97 2006 million in 2006. 1.4 1.2 Exports from North Dakota FTZs decreased by 1.0 0.8 65.0%.Exports of manufactured commodities from 0.6 North Dakota increased 4.8% during the 2005-2006 0.4 calendar year.* 0.2 0.0 Annual Volume Exports Jobs associated with North Dakota FTZs decreased 20.9% to 400, while total nonfarm employment in North Dakota increased by 1.6%. Employment Percentage Changes (North Dakota 2005-2006)

5.0% 1.6% FTZ Employment 0.0% State Employment -5.0%

-10.0%

-15.0%

-20.0% -20.9% -25.0%

-30.0%

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. North Dakota Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 103 Grand Forks (Pembina), North Dakota No. 267 Fargo, North Dakota FTZ No. 103 maintains 1 subzone and serves 1 FTZ No. 267 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 business, Imation Corp. Imation receives components businesses. The FTZ was established on December 19, from Japan and Hong Kong for manufacturing of 2005. The grantee is working with local manufacturing magnetic diskettes, optical discs, and data cartridges. firms, primarily CNH Global to begin the activation The grantee continues to market the zone to potential process. Additionally, the grantee markets FTZ No. 267 users. The new AG Depot site for the storage and through its website and at seminars. handling of agricultural chemicals is now activated. Ohio

Foreign-Trade Zones: 10 Exports: $2.47 billion Active Firms: 139 Annual Volume: $30.87 billion Employment: 42,934 Active Subzones: 11

Ohio Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 8 Toledo 2,143 8,628.23 0.00 7 4 No. 40 Cleveland 9,417 1,542.01 145.61 64 2 No. 46 Cincinnati 20,822 16,305.80 2,145.51 5 3 No. 100 Dayton 111 1.57 0.26 1 0 No. 101 Clinton County (Wilmington) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 138 Franklin County (Columbus) 784 255.65 14.42 10 0 No. 151 Findlay (Toledo) 7,091 163.34 0.00 40 1 No. 181 Akron/Canton 2,566 3,976.06 162.41 12 1 No. 264 Marietta 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 270 Lawrence County Port Authority (South Point) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 10 42,934 30,872.67 2,468.21 139 11

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports $ millions (Ohio 2005-2006) The volume of FTZ activity in Ohio increased 27.4% 35000 2005 from $24.24 billion in 2005 to $30.87 billion in 2006. 30000 2006

25000 Exports from Ohio FTZs increased by 4.5%. 20000 Exports of manufactured commodities from Ohio increased 14.6% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* 15000 10000

Jobs associated with Ohio FTZs decreased 7.9% to 5000

42,934. Total nonfarm employment in Ohio increased 0 by 0.2%. Annual Volume Exports Ohio Foreign-Trade Zones Employment Percentage Changes (Ohio 2005-2006)

No. 8 Toledo, Ohio 10.0% FTZ No. 8 maintains 4 subzones and serves 7 businesses. The manufacturing processes conducted 5.0% in the GPZ include blending sugar products. The FTZ Employment 0.2% subzones serve three oil refineries operated by Valero 0.0% State Employment Energy Corporation, BP Products North America, Inc, and Sunoco. Subzone 8H, operated by Sunoco was -5.0% activated in December 2005. The growth in volume -7.9% in the FTZ resulted partially from the activities in the -10.0% Sunoco subzone. Subzone 8C, operated by Sandusky Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Limited, was scheduled to close on December 15, 2006. Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Subzone 8E was approved for activation on October 11, 2006. warehouses, U.S. Customs and Border Protection No. 40 Cleveland, Ohio (CBP) brokers, and third party logistics providers. FTZ No. 40 maintains 2 subzones and serves 64 Other companies that operate within the zone include: businesses. The GPZ has 5 clients pending activation. Siemens, Excel Global Logistics, Rolls-Royce Energy Three sites were approved in December 2005. The Systems, Philips Electronics, PPG, and Anchor Hocking. subzones in FTZ No. 40 are operated by Lincoln Electric The grantee continues to promote the zone’s benefits to Company and Ben Venue Laboratories, Inc. potential users.

No. 46 Cincinnati, Ohio No. 151 Findlay (Toledo), Ohio FTZ No. 46 maintains 3 subzones and serves 5 FTZ No. 151 maintains 1 subzone and serves 40 businesses, including GE Aviation and Honda of America businesses. The general purpose zone is located within MFG., Inc. the Tall Timbers Industrial Center, and the activated space is used as warehouse space. The expanded No. 100 Dayton, Ohio general zone is at Ottowa Industrial Park. FTZ No. 100 maintains 0 subzones and serves 1 business, Gosiger, Inc., which uses warehouse space No. 181 Akron/Canton, Ohio in the zone and distributes machinery from Europe FTZ No. 181 maintains 1 subzone and serves 12 and Asia. The zone’s activity declined during FY 2006. businesses. In FY 2006, 11 companies were activated. Both UPS and Menlo Worldwide Forwarding ceased The subzone serves Marathon Petroleum Company, their operations at the air cargo hub at the Dayton LLC. The grantee continues to employ an integrated International Airport (DAY). marketing strategy for the FTZ, while improving services to operators and users. No. 101 Clinton County (Wilmington), Ohio FTZ No. 101 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 No. 264 Marietta, Ohio businesses. The zone was inactive during the reporting FTZ No. 264 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 period but approved for reactivation in early FY 2007. businesses. This FTZ was approved for operation in FTZ No. 101 is working with DHL to utilize the benefits May 2006. of the zone. No. 270 Lawrence County Port Authority No. 138 Franklin County (Columbus), Ohio (South Point), Ohio FTZ No. 138 maintains 0 subzones and serves 10 FTZ No. 270 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. During the reporting period, the 10 firms businesses. FTZ No. 270 is in the process of area increased their activity, which led to the rise in exports designation, and activation will proceed in the next and employment. The zone serves a number of public 1-2 years. Oklahoma

Foreign-Trade Zones: 4 Exports: $51.79 million Active Firms: 5 Annual Volume: $1.58 billion Employment: 1,743 Active Subzones: 3

Oklahoma Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 53 Rogers County (Tulsa) 1,000 346.80 44.80 1 0 No. 106 Oklahoma City 392 41.38 6.99 3 2 No. 164 Muskogee 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 227 Durant 351 1190.35 0.00 1 1 Total 4 1,743 1578.53 51.79 5 3

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Oklahoma 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Oklahoma increased 1500 2005 249.4% from $0.45 billion in 2005 to $1.58 billion in 1250 2006 2006 due to the activation of the Valero oil refinery. 1000

Exports from Oklahoma FTZs decreased by 12.5%. 750 Exports of manufactured commodities from Oklahoma 500 increased 10.2% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* 250

Jobs associated with Oklahoma FTZs increased 0 18.1% to 1,743, while total nonfarm employment in Annual Volume Exports Oklahoma increased by 1.5%. Employment Percentage Changes (Oklahoma 2005-2006)

30.0%

25.0%

20.0% 18.1%

15.0%

10.0%

5.0% 1.5% 0.0% FTZ Employment State Employment

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Oklahoma Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 53 Rogers County (Tulsa), Oklahoma No. 164 Muskogee, Oklahoma FTZ No. 53 maintains 0 subzones and serves 1 FTZ No. 164 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 business, the MerCruiser Division of the Brunswick businesses. The Muskogee City-County Port Authority Corporation. MerCruiser manufactures marine engines markets the FTZ through a number of channels, while in the FTZ. The grantee is currently working toward the assisting potential users in their analysis of FTZ activation of one or more areas/facilities. benefits.

No. 106 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma No. 227 Durant, Oklahoma FTZ No. 106 maintains 2 subzones and serves 3 FTZ No. 227 maintains 1 subzone and serves 1 businesses, including Imation Corporation and Xerox. business. Subzone 227A, owned and operated by Valero Zone activities include chemically coating raw film Refining Company - Oklahoma, an indirect subsidiary of and the distribution, storage, and manufacture of Valero Energy Corporation, was activated in November copy machines and laser printers. The zone provides 2005. The grantee, Rural Enterprises of Oklahoma, Inc., marketing assistance and materials to promote its continues to aggressively market the GPZ to potential development. Additionally, the zone filed expansion users. applications to add new sites. Oregon

Foreign-Trade Zones: 4 Exports: $16.70 million Active Firms: 5 Annual Volume: $115.82 million Employment: 462 Active Subzones: 1

Oregon Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 45 Portland 462 115.82 16.70 5 1 No. 132 Coos County (Coos Bay) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 184 Klamath Falls 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 206 Medford-Jackson County 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 4 462 115.82 16.70 5 1

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Oregon 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Oregon increased 140 2005 3,367.7% from $3.34 million in 2005 to $115.82 120 2006 million in 2006. Activity in FTZ No. 45 increased 100 dramatically due to the activation of a new subzone and 80

Mazda’s temporary use of the FTZ. 60

40 Exports from Oregon FTZs increased by 943.8%, 20 due to the activation of the new subzone and Mazda’s 0 activities. Exports of manufactured commodities from Annual Volume Exports Oregon increased 27.1% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* Employment Percentage Changes (Oregon 2005-2006) Jobs associated with Oregon FTZs increased by 3000.0% 2,787.5% because of the activation of subzone 45F. 2787.5% Total nonfarm employment in Oregon increased by 2.9%.

2000.0%

1000.0%

2.9% 0.0% FTZ Employment State Employment

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Oregon Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 45 Portland, Oregon No. 132 Coos County (Coos Bay), Oregon FTZ No. 45 maintains 1 subzone, serves 5 FTZ No. 132 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses, and accounts for the only FTZ activity businesses. The Coos County Airport continues to in Oregon. The annual volume and exports are propose a minor boundary modification, which will likely significantly greater this year due to the temporary result in activity. A new terminal project has delayed the inclusion of motor vehicles handled by Mazda. Mazda boundary modification project until 2007. used a location in the FTZ to offload motor vehicles No. 184 Klamath Falls, Oregon damaged in a shipping accident. Additionally, Epson FTZ No. 184 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 Portland, Inc. began its FTZ Subzone operations on businesses. Statistics for FTZ No. 184 are unavailable October 6, 2005, which also accounts for the increase for 2006. in volume, exports, and employment. FTZ No. 206 Medford-Jackson County, Oregon FTZ No. 206 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. Pennsylvania

Foreign-Trade Zones: 6 Exports: $0.21 billion Active Firms: 23 Annual Volume: $18.62 billion Employment: 17,871 Active Subzones: 7

Pennsylvania Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 24 Pittston (Wilkes-Barre/Scranton) 492 11.74 14.23 1 1 No. 33 Allegheny County (Pittsburgh) 3,913 781.56 16.40 7 1 No. 35 Philadelphia 13,113 17,600.68 163.52 13 4 No. 147 Berks County (Philadelphia) 353 226.25 15.41 1 1 No. 247 Erie 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 254 Jefferson County (Pittsburgh) 0 0.09 0.09 1 0 Total 6 17,871 18,620.31 209.65 23 7

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Pennsylvania 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Pennsylvania 20000 2005 increased 16.7% from $15.96 billion in 2005 to 2006 16000 $18.62 billion in 2006. The largest increases in activity were in FTZs 35 and 147. An increase in shipbuilding 12000 activity in Subzone 35E accounts for a portion of the 8000 increase in activity in FTZ 35. The activation of the Clarks North America subzone in FTZ 147 is responsible 4000 for its increased activity in FY 2006. 0 Annual Volume Exports Exports from Pennsylvania FTZs increased by 5.0%. Exports of manufactured commodities from Pennsylvania Employment Percentage Changes increased 33.2% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* (Pennsylvania 2005-2006)

20.0% Jobs associated with Pennsylvania FTZs increased

8.9% to 17,871, while total nonfarm employment in 15.0% Pennsylvania increased by 0.9%.

10.0% 8.9%

5.0%

0.9% 0.0% FTZ Employment State Employment

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Pennsylvania Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 24 Pittston No. 147 Berks County (Wilkes-Barre/Scranton), Pennsylvania (Philadelphia), Pennsylvania FTZ No. 24 maintains 1 subzone and serves 1 FTZ No. 147 maintains 1 subzone and serves 1 business, Merck & Co, Inc., which uses the zone to business. Clarks North America activated subzone manufacture bulk pharmaceuticals and intermediates 147A in the first quarter of FY 2006. GlaxoSmithKline for bulk/finished pharmaceuticals, as well as several maintained active status but had no activity. It will fermentation products. The Bahco Tools subzone remain active in FY 2007 in anticipation of future zone remained inactive in FY 2006. The FTZ administrator use. D&D Distribution Services is in the process of continues to actively market the zone and respond to activating a general purpose warehouse. Activation is inquiries from potential users. expected to occur in the second quarter of FY 2007.

No. 33 Allegheny County No. 247 Erie, Pennsylvania (Pittsburgh), Pennsylvania FTZ No. 247 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 FTZ No. 33 maintains 1 subzone and serves 7 businesses, though ongoing dialogues continue in a businesses. The GPZ serves jet fuel operators, bid to find businesses interested in becoming subzone while subzone operations encompass manufacturing users. The GPZ was not activated during the last fiscal operations of Sony. The grantee seeks expansion of year, but the two publicly-controlled GPZs - the Erie the zone project to include additional sites throughout International Airport and the O-N Minerals Company, southwestern PA. formerly the Erie-Western Pennsylvania Port Authority’s Mountfort Marine Terminal continue to complete capital No. 35 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania improvements to enhance the GPZs. FTZ No. 35 maintains 4 subzones and serves 13 businesses, including, Merck & Co., Sunoco, Inc., No. 254 Jefferson County ConocoPhillips, and Aker Philadelphia Shipyard. The GPZ (Pittsburgh), Pennsylvania provides jet fuel storage and delivery facilities. In 2006, FTZ No. 254 maintains 0 subzones and serves 1 US Airways and British Airways were the predominant business. Kanematsu U.S.A. Inc. utilized the FTZ users of foreign status jet fuel at the zone site. Warehouse as a storage facility for high impact PS resin in FY 2006. The grantee will be working with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in the near future to activate an additional building in the Zone. Puerto Rico

Foreign-Trade Zones: 3 Exports: $0.52 billion Active Firms: 124 Annual Volume: $5.88 billion Employment: 10,016 Active Subzones: 15

Puerto Rico Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 7 Mayaguez 4,866 2,201.73 300.17 20 8 No. 61 Guaynabo 4,085 2,464.66 211.25 77 7 No. 163 Ponce 1,065 1,215.97 11.87 27 0 Total 3 10,016 5,882.36 523.30 124 15

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Puerto Rico 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Puerto Rico increased 7000 2005 42.0% from $4.14 billion in 2005 to $5.88 billion in 6000 2006

2006. 5000

4000 Exports from Puerto Rico FTZs decreased by 26.7%. 3000 Exports of manufactured commodities from Puerto Rico 2000 increased 12.3% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* 1000

Jobs associated with Puerto Rico FTZs increased 0 32.8% to 10,016 while total nonfarm employment in Annual Volume Exports Puerto Rico decreased 0.6%. Employment Percentage Changes (Puerto Rico 2005-2006)

35.0% 32.8%

25.0%

15.0%

5.0% State Employment

FTZ Employment -0.6% -5.0%

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Puerto Rico Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 7 Mayaguez, Puerto Rico No. 163 Ponce, Puerto Rico FTZ No. 7 maintains 8 subzones and serves 20 FTZ No. 163 maintains 0 subzones and serves 27 businesses, including a number of pharmaceutical businesses, down from 29 in the previous fiscal year. manufacturers, auto manufacturers, and oil companies. FY 2006 was not as profitable as expected because the The general purpose zone served three new companies Puerto Rican economy was affected by numerous factors in 2006. Additionally, subzone 7H, Ortho Biologics which influenced zone activities. Production in the zone LLC, was activated on March 16, 2006 and subzone includes vehicles, agricultural equipment, furniture, 7I, Abbott Pharmaceuticals PR, Ltd, was activated on heavy equipment, minerals, fuels, air conditioners, and December 28, 2005. pharmaceutical products. The grantee plans to promote the FTZ by visiting industries operating in the southern No. 61 Guaynabo (San Juan), Puerto Rico part of the island which have plans to develop their FTZ No. 61 maintains 7 subzones and serves 77 facilities. businesses, up from 56 businesses the previous fiscal year. Pharmaceutical companies operating in the subzones account for most of the zone’s activity. The zone’s volume increased in 2006, largely because of the activation of subzone 61I, operated by Shell Chemical Yabucoa, Inc., and two minor boundary modifications in the GPZ. The zone continues to play a role in the Puerto Rican Commonwealth’s policy of Small and Medium Enterprise promotion. Rhode Island

Foreign-Trade Zones: 1 Exports: $0.00 million Active Firms: 1 Annual Volume: $1.32 million Employment: 175 Active Subzones: 0

Rhode Island Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 105 Providence & North Kingstown 175 1.32 0.00 1 0 Total 1 175 1.32 0.00 1 0

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Rhode Island 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Rhode Island 1.6 2005 increased from zero to $1.32 million due to Senesco 2006 Marine’s activities. 1.4

Exports From Rhode Island FTZs remained at zero. 0.8 Exports of manufactured commodities from Rhode Island increased by 17.6% during the 2005-2006 calendar 0.4 year.* 0.0 Annual Volume Exports Jobs associated with Rhode Island FTZs increased from zero to 175. Total nonfarm employment in Rhode Island increased by 0.1% over the past fiscal year. Employment Percentage Changes (Rhode Island 2005-2006)

200.0% 175.0%

Rhode Island 150.0% Foreign-Trade Zones

100.0% No. 105 Providence & North Kingstown, Rhode Island 50.0% FTZ No. 105 maintained 0 subzones and served 1 0.1% business in FY 2006, which was Senesco Marine. 0.0% However, the firm moved its equipment to Maryland FTZ Employment State Employment Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of after its contract with a customer failed to materialize. Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of The zone is generating more interest within the Quonset Labor Statistics. Business Park from existing tenants and other prospects primarily due to the new freight rail project that was completed in September 2006.

South Carolina

Foreign-Trade Zones: 3 Exports: $1.91 billion Active Firms: 13 Annual Volume: $11.47 billion Employment: 8,682 Active Subzones: 4

South Carolina Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 21 Dorchester County (Charleston) 236 943.80 125.69 8 1 No. 38 Spartanburg County 8,446 10,529.96 1,788.93 5 3 No. 127 West Columbia (Columbia) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 3 8,682 11,473.76 1,914.62 13 4

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (South Carolina 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in South Carolina 14000 2005 increased 4.4% from $10.99 billion in 2005 to $11.47 12000 2006

billion in 2006. 10000

Exports from South Carolina FTZs increased 12.5% 8000 from $1.70 billion in 2005 to $1.91 billion in 2006. 6000 Exports of manufactured commodities from South 4000 Carolina increased 16.7% during the 2005-2006 2000 calendar year.* 0 Annual Volume Exports Jobs associated with South Carolina FTZs increased 0.2% over the past year reaching 8,682 in 2006, while Employment Percentage Changes (South Carolina 2005-2006) total nonfarm employment in South Carolina increased 10.0% by 2.4%.

8.0%

6.0%

4.0% 2.4% 2.0%

0.2% 0.0% FTZ Employment State Employment

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. South Carolina Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 21 Dorchester County No. 38 Spartanburg County (Charleston), South Carolina (Greenville-Spartanburg), South Carolina FTZ No. 21 maintains 1 subzone and serves 8 FTZ No. 38 maintains 3 subzones and serves 5 businesses. The FTZ is becoming more active and an businesses, including BMW Manufacturing LLC, Faurecia expansion application will be submitted in early 2007 to Interior Systems, FujiFilm Manufacturing USA, Inc., add additional sites. Zone operators include the Robert and Michelin North America. Michelin North America Bosch Corporation, which uses the zone for motor recovered from a major fire in 2005 and was fully active distribution and Lanxess Corporation whose rubber in 2006. BMW continues to promote the use of the FTZ chemicals facilities are located in the subzone. for its suppliers. Additionally, the Global Trade Center, an exhibition hall for global companies to display products within the GPZ, was activated in the first quarter of 2006.

No. 127 West Columbia (Columbia), South Carolina FTZ No. 127 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. The grantee participates in conferences, workshops, and seminars to network and market the FTZ. South Dakota

Foreign-Trade Zones: 1 Exports: $0.00 million Active Firms: 1 Annual Volume: $0.02 million Employment: 4 Active Subzones: 0

South Dakota Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 220 Sioux Falls 4 0.02 0.00 1 0 Total 1 4 0.02 0.00 1 0

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (South Dakota 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in South Dakota 2.0 2005 increased from zero to $0.02 million due to the 2006 warehousing services by Nordica Warehouses, Inc. 1.5

Exports from South Dakota FTZs remained at zero. 1.0 Exports of manufactured commodities from South Dakota decreased 12.5% during the 2005-2006 0.5 calendar year. 0.0 Annual Volume Exports Jobs associated with South Dakota FTZs increased from zero to 4. Total nonfarm employment in South Employment Percentage Changes Dakota increased by 2.0% over the past fiscal year. (South Dakota 2005-2006)

10.0%

South Dakota 8.0%

Foreign-Trade Zones 6.0%

4.0% No. 220 Sioux Falls, South Dakota 4.0%

FTZ No. 220 maintains 0 subzones and serves 1 2.0% 2.0% business. Nordica Warehouses, Inc. was responsible for storing an ocean container of 7 used Japanese 0.0% FTZ Employment State Employment mini-trucks that were required to have low range speed Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of controls installed prior to them being entered into Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of U.S. domestic commerce. Joint efforts are ongoing to Labor Statistics. aggressively seek additional businesses that would benefit from the services offered by the zone.

Tennessee

Foreign-Trade Zones: 6 Exports: $2.82 billion Active Firms: 34 Annual Volume: $19.90 billion Employment: 18,633 Active Subzones: 5

Tennessee Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 77 Memphis 1,187 2,225.58 29.13 17 2 No. 78 Nashville 17,048 16,866.64 2,612.47 3 2 No. 134 Chattanooga 30 14.50 8.58 1 0 No. 148 Knoxville 368 795.86 168.34 13 1 No. 204 Tri-City 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 223 Memphis 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 6 18,633 19,902.58 2,818.52 34 5

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Tennessee 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Tennessee decreased 25000 2005 16.2% from $23.74 billion in 2005 to $19.90 billion 2006 20000 in 2006.

15000 Exports from Tennessee FTZs increased 23.1% from $2.29 billion in 2005 to $2.82 billion in 2006. Exports 10000 of manufactured commodities from Tennessee increased 5000 17.4% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* 0 Jobs associated with Tennessee FTZs increased Annual Volume Exports 20.4% over the past year, reaching 18,633 in 2006. In contrast, total nonfarm employment in Tennessee Employment Percentage Changes (Tennessee 2005-2006) increased by 1.1% during the past fiscal year. 30.0%

25.0% 20.4% 20.0%

15.0%

10.0%

5.0% 1.1% 0.0% FTZ Employment State Employment

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Tennessee Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 77 Memphis, Tennessee No. 148 Knoxville, Tennessee FTZ No. 77 maintains 2 subzones and serves 17 FTZ No. 148 maintains 1 subzone and serves 13 businesses. Annual volume and exports increased in businesses. The subzone operator, Panasonic Electronic this zone. Brother Industries (USA) Inc. exported finished Devices, processes aluminum foil and manufactures products to European markets and parts to suppliers audio speakers and aluminum electrolytic capacitors. in Asia, which accounts for the increase in exports. Production in the speaker and capacitor plants in Activities in the GPZ are concentrated in packing/ the subzone decreased significantly in 2006, while repacking, labeling/relabeling, and storage. production in the aluminum foil plant increased. The grantee’s application for expansion and reorganization No. 78 Nashville, Tennessee was approved in 2006, which will allow for further growth FTZ No. 78 maintains 2 subzones and serves 3 of the zone and economic expansion in the region. businesses: Dell, Sanford Brands, and Nissan. Activities in the zone and subzones include the manufacture and No. 204 Tri-City (Tri-City Regional Airport), assembly of automobiles, writing utensils/art products Tennessee for retail customers, and high performance computer FTZ No. 204 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 systems. businesses. The subzone, although inactive for FY 2006, is currently acting as a distribution zone, but has plans No. 134 Chattanooga, Tennessee to manufacture automation systems for the primary FTZ No. 134 maintains 0 subzones and serves 1 industrial market. Actions are underway to activate business, Sofix Corporation, which completed its first full Leitner Pharmaceuticals and Johnson City Chemical fiscal year of manufacturing in the zone in 2006. Sofix Company for operation in the GPZ. produces black colorformers for the domestic and export markets. The grantee is preparing an application to No. 223 Memphis, Tennessee expand the GPZ to include ten new sites to maximize the FTZ No. 223 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 economic impact on the greater Chattanooga area. businesses. Texas

Foreign-Trade Zones: 33 Exports: $6.34 billion Active Firms: 480 Annual Volume: $149.21 billion Employment: 57,924 Active Subzones: 50

Texas Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 12 McAllen (Hidalgo) 2,971 1,435.87 1,176.22 85 0 No. 36 Galveston 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 39 Dallas/Fort Worth 3,482 2,128.58 100.60 18 5 No. 62 Brownsville 3,000 1,736.01 683.11 6 0 No. 68 El Paso 349 1192.69 461.44 50 0 No. 80 San Antonio 96 212.66 0.60 1 0 No. 84 Harris County (Houston) 16,108 54,145.28 2,074.92 236 14 No. 94 Webb County (Laredo) 132 149.19 265.73 16 0 No. 95 Starr County (Rio Grande City & Roma) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 96 Maverick County (Eagle Pass) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 113 Ellis County (Midlothian) 100 498.49 0.00 2 0 No. 115 Beaumont 3,000 11,000.00 211.00 1 1 No. 116 Jefferson County (Port Arthur) 3,581 15,131.78 0.00 4 4 No. 117 Orange County 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 122 Corpus Christi 8,401 26,344.27 864.32 16 11 No. 149 Freeport 2,642 13,176.44 192.24 8 4 No. 150 El Paso 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 155 Victoria & Calhoun Counties (Point Comfort) 1,032 295.13 10.56 1 1 No. 156 Weslaco 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 165 Midland 1,997 3,389.00 33.00 1 1 No. 168 Dallas/Fort Worth 1,395 699.09 17.93 18 1 No. 171 Liberty County (Houston) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 183 Austin 2,059 1362.26 240.62 4 2 No. 196 Fort Worth (Dallas/Fort Worth) 3,831 4,806.39 0.01 7 0 No. 199 Texas City (Houston – Galveston) 2,677 11,483.13 0.00 5 5 No. 234 Gregg County (Shreveport – Bossier) 1,071 26.39 3.12 1 1 No. 246 Waco (Dallas/Fort Worth) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 251 Edinburg (Hidalgo/Pharr) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 252 Amarillo 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 258 Bowie County 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 260 Lubbock 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 265 Conroe 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 269 Athens 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 33 57,924 149,212.65 6,335.42 480 50 Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau. Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Texas 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Texas increased by 160000 2005 7.8%, from $138.37 billion in 2005 to $149.21 billion 140000 2006 in 2006 largely due to the continuous rise in the price 120000 of oil. 100000 80000

Exports from Texas FTZs increased 24.2%, from 60000

$5.10 billion in 2005 to $6.34 billion in 2006. Exports 40000 of manufactured commodities from Texas decreased 20000 6.6% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* 0 Annual Volume Exports Jobs associated with Texas FTZs decreased 7.7% from 62,777 in 2005 to 57,924 in 2006. Total nonfarm Employment Percentage Changes (Texas 2005-2006) employment in Texas increased by 2.2% 10.0%

7.5%

5.0% 2.2% Tex as 2.5% FTZ Employment Foreign-Trade Zones 0.0% State Employment -2.5% No. 12 McAllen (Hidalgo), Texas -5.0% FTZ No. 12 maintains 0 subzones and serves 85 -7.5% businesses. This year, volume and exports decreased -7.7% -10.0% slightly. Zone imports came primarily from Japan. The Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of top five commodities of foreign status received in the Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of FTZ were auto parts, electronic components, liquor, Labor Statistics. motor parts, and watch parts. Tenants use the zone for repackaging, export warehousing and inspection.

No. 36 Galveston, Texas No. 68 El Paso, Texas FTZ No. 36 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 FTZ No. 68 maintains 0 subzones and serves 50 businesses. The port continues to work with the airport businesses. Companies utilizing the GPZ conducted and Galveston Economic Development Partnership to manipulation, destruction, warehousing, and storage. cooperatively market the zone. There is currently no manufacturing activity in FTZ No. 68; however, Electrolux is expected to be the first No. 39 Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas manufacturing operator activated in the GPZ in the next FTZ No. 39 maintains 5 subzones and serves 18 year. The zone’s expansion application was approved in businesses. These firms include Exel Global Logistics, June 2006. China is the leading trade partner in FTZ No. Inc., Fossil Partners LP, Sanden International (USA), Inc., 68. But, distribution facilities in El Paso are critical to and Eurocopter, which produce and service commodities the maquiladora operations in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. such as watches, sunglasses, computer hard drives, air-conditioning compressor/clutch assemblies, and No. 80 San Antonio, Texas helicopter parts. FTZ No. 80 maintains 0 subzones and serves 1 business. The zone is used for storage, inspection, No. 62 Brownsville, Texas repair, marketing, and shipment of telephones and FTZ No. 62 maintains 0 subzones and serves 6 accessories. The City of San Antonio participates in a businesses. This year, the use of the FTZ by some variety of expositions, trips, and meetings to promote smaller companies decreased, but liquid bulk terminals the FTZ program. The FTZ is in the process of activating and the oil rig repair facility increased their activity. The additional zone space. zone relies heavily upon U.S.-Mexico trade. Texas Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 84 Harris County (Houston), Texas No. 116 Jefferson County (Port Arthur), Texas FTZ No. 84 maintains 14 subzones and serves 236 FTZ No. 116 maintains 4 subzones and serves 4 businesses, making it the most active FTZ in Texas. businesses in the petroleum industry. Annual volume A number of oil refineries use the zone, while other in the zone rose by over $500 million due to higher admitted products include foreign and domestic steel, productivity in the standard refining operations by The computer equipment, machinery, and parts. Annual Premcor Refining Group Inc. combined with the rise in volume for the zone increased by almost $12 billion. the price of oil.

No. 94 Webb County (Laredo), Texas No. 117 Orange County, Texas FTZ No. 94 maintains 0 subzones and serves 16 FTZ No. 117 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. Foreign origin merchandise arrives from businesses. a number of countries and includes commodities No. 122 Corpus Christi, Texas such as apparel, footwear, textiles, engine parts, FTZ No. 122 maintains 11 subzones and serves 16 electronics, and miniature motors. Although there is businesses. The businesses served are primarily no manufacturing at the zone, the Port of Laredo is concentrated in the petroleum industry. Other activities central to U.S. trade with Mexico due to its strategically within the zone include the construction of offshore important location for overland merchandise trade. underwater structural supports, the processing of raw No. 95 Starr County minerals, the production of aluminum oxide, and the (Rio Grande City and Roma), Texas transport of unassembled windmills and substantial FTZ No. 95 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 shipments of poultry. businesses. No statistics were available for FTZ No. 95 No. 149 Freeport, Texas for 2006. FTZ No. 149 maintains 4 subzones and serves 8 No. 96 Maverick County (Eagle Pass), Texas businesses. The subzone sites include a chemical FTZ No. 96 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 company, a pharmaceutical company, an oil refinery, and businesses. two petrochemical complexes. The primary GPZ user utilizes the zone by storing imported polypropylene bags No. 113 Ellis County (Midlothian), Texas from Saudi Arabia, which are then filled with rice and re- FTZ No. 113 maintains 0 subzones and serves 2 exported to Saudia Arabia. businesses, which are involved in importing motor vehicles. While both firms use the zone for storing the No. 150 El Paso, Texas vehicles, one of them is also very actively engaged in FTZ No. 150 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 repairing and accessorizing its vehicles by installing businesses. domestic status components, such as radios, CD No. 155 Victoria and Calhoun Counties players, floor mats, wheel locks, etc. The grantee (Point Comfort), Texas continues to actively market the zone. FTZ No. 155 maintains 1 subzone and serves 1 No. 115 Beaumont, Texas business, Alcoa Alumina & Chemicals, LLC. Annual FTZ No. 115 maintains 1 subzone and serves 1 volume and exports in the zone increased, as Alcoa business, ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, which refines continued to import significant quantities of bauxite and petroleum and petrochemical products. With the fluorspar into the United States and exported alumina, continuing rise in oil prices, annual volume increased by aluminum fluoride, and petcoke briquettes. $1.4 billion and employment rose by 1,150 persons in No. 156 Weslaco, Texas the FTZ. FTZ No. 156 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. Texas Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 165 Midland, Texas require an application for the expansion of the FTZ. The FTZ No. 165 maintains 1 subzone and serves 1 construction of a major container terminal in the Texas business, the ConocoPhillips Borger Refinery. The rise in City Harbour was delayed until 2007. the volume of crude oil received and the higher price of No. 234 Gregg County oil account for the increases in annual volume, exports, (Shreveport - Bossier), Texas and employment. FTZ No. 234 maintains 1 subzone and serves 1 No. 168 Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas business, LeTourneu, Inc., which accounts for the FTZ No. 168 maintains 1 subzone and serves 18 increase in activity in the zone. Another subzone was businesses. Most GPZ activity consists of worldwide operated by Eubank Manufacturing Enterprises before distribution of products, some of which include deactivation in early 2006. machinery, clocks and watches, and precious metals. No. 246 Waco (Dallas/Fort Worth), Texas Meanwhile, the sole subzone user, B & F Systems is FTZ No. 246 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 involved in the distribution of leather and housewares businesses. Marketing and promotional efforts continue products. Currently, the FTZ is reviewing three zone and the grantee expects current operators to activate in expansion applications and one subzone expansion the near future. application for the upcoming year. No. 251 Edinburg (Hidalgo/Pharr), Texas No. 171 Liberty County (Houston), Texas FTZ No. 251 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 FTZ No. 171 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. Airport Master Plan efforts to transform the businesses. The zone continues its marketing efforts to airport into a cargo service hub are underway. attract prospective users and has received a substantial degree of interest from companies looking at the area No. 252 Amarillo, Texas as a prime location for distribution operations. FTZ No. 252 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. Both the City of Amarillo and the Amarillo No. 183 Austin, Texas Economic Development Corporation continue to FTZ No. 183 maintains 2 subzones and serves 4 aggressively market the zone. businesses. Its annual volume decreased significantly due to the departure of one of the GPZ operators and No. 258 Bowie County, Texas the downsizing of many of the activities by the Dell FTZ No. 258 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 Corporation. businesses. Initial activations are expected in 2007.

No. 196 Fort Worth (Dallas/Fort Worth), Texas No. 260 Lubbock, Texas FTZ No. 196 maintains 0 subzones and serves 7 FTZ No. 260 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. Zone activity includes warehousing, businesses. inspection, and distribution of mobile phones, cigarettes, and wine. Value-added activity consisted of No. 265 Conroe, Texas the installation of additional components to Hyundai FTZ No. 265 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 motor vehicles. The FTZ is marketed on both the national businesses. Subzone status was approved on July 12, and international levels. 2006 for operations conducted by WLS Drilling Products, Inc. No. 199 Texas City (Houston - Galveston), Texas No. 269 Athens, Texas FTZ No. 199 maintains 5 subzones and serves 5 FTZ No. 269 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. These include a number of oil refineries, businesses. FTZ No. 269 was established on April a crude oil transshipment facility and a manufacturing 3, 2006. The zone’s grantee is the Athens Economic facility for butyrolactone. A new intermodal yard and Development Corporation. No activity has occurred since warehousing complex is under construction, which will activation; however, the facility may be activated by the end of 2006. Utah

Foreign-Trade Zones: 1 Exports: $0.00 billion Active Firms: 0 Annual Volume: $0.00 billion Employment: 0 Active Subzones: 0

Utah Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 30 Salt Lake City 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 1 0 0.00 0.00 0 0

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Utah Foreign-Trade Zones The volume of FTZ activity in Utah remained at zero. No. 30 Salt Lake City, Utah Exports from Utah FTZs remained at zero. FTZ No. 30 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 Exports of manufactured commodities from Utah businesses. increased by 19.0% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.*

Jobs associated with Utah FTZs remained at zero. Total nonfarm employment in Utah increased by 4.6% over the past fiscal year.

Vermont

Foreign-Trade Zones: 2 Exports: $0.00 billion Active Firms: 0 Annual Volume: $0.00 billion Employment: 0 Active Subzones: 0

Vermont Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 55 Burlington 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 268 Brattleboro 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 2 0 0.00 0.00 0 0

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Vermont Foreign-Trade Zones The volume of FTZ activity in Vermont remained at zero. No. 55 Burlington, Vermont FTZ No. 55 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 Exports from Vermont FTZs remained at zero. businesses. Subzone 55B remained de-activated in Exports of manufactured commodities from Vermont 2006. PBM Nutritionals purchased Subzone 55B from decreased 20.3% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* Wyeth Nutritionals in FY 2005. Jobs associated with Vermont FTZs remained at No. 268 Brattleboro, Vermont zero. Total nonfarm employment in Vermont increased FTZ No. 268 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 by 0.9% over the past fiscal year. businesses. It has not reported any activity since it was designated as a FTZ in 2005.

Virginia

Foreign-Trade Zones: 5 Exports: $0.20 billion Active Firms: 7 Annual Volume: $1.08 billion Employment: 2,124 Active Subzones: 3

Virginia Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 20 Suffolk (Norfolk-Newport News) 1,381 1,073.53 98.91 5 2 No. 137 Dulles International Airport (DC) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 185 Culpepper County (Front Royal) 742 9.71 100.60 1 1 No. 207 Richmond (Richmond-Petersburg) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 238 Dublin 1 0.00 0.90 1 0 Total 5 2,124 1,083.24 200.41 7 3

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Virginia 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Virginia decreased 1800 2005 35.3% from $1.67 billion in 2005 to $1.08 billion in 1600 2006 2006. The decrease in volume is due to a decrease in 1400 1200 the number of firms served. Additionally, the volume 1000 generated by FTZ No. 185 decreased dramatically 800 in 2006. 600 400 Exports from Virginia FTZs increased 18.0% from 200 $0.17 billion in 2005 to $.20 billion in 2006. Exports 0 Annual Volume Exports of manufactured commodities from Virginia increased 11.1% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* Employment Percentage Changes (Virginia 2005-2006) Jobs associated with Virginia FTZs decreased 2.5% 5.0% over the year, reaching 2,124 in 2006. This is largely 2.5% due to the decrease in employment in the GPZ in FTZ 0.9% FTZ Employment No. 20, due to a user moving part of its operation to a 0.0% State Employment centralized port. In contrast, total nonfarm employment -2.5% in Virginia increased by 0.9% over the past fiscal year. -2.5% -5.0%

-7.5%

-10.0%

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Virginia Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 20 Suffolk (Norfolk - Newport News), Virginia No. 185 Culpepper County (Front Royal), Virginia FTZ No. 20 maintains 2 subzones and serves 5 FTZ No. 185 maintains 1 subzone and serves 1 businesses. Givens Inc.’s activity declined in 2006, business, Merck & Co., Inc. Merck’s annual volume but it is in the process of expanding its activated and exports decreased in 2006. Merck began boundaries. Pak-Al was used exclusively as a domestic the manufacture of cell paste for the new Human warehouse, but its largest customer has plans to Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for women in 2006. use the FTZ for goods to be re-exported in FY 2007. No. 207 Richmond (Richmond - Petersburg), Virginia The Wallops Spaceflight facility was activated, but FTZ No. 148 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 reported no activity in 2006. The grantee plans to businesses. The zone continues to be marketed in file an expansion application to add a site to the FTZ Central and Southern Virginia. The marketing efforts boundaries. Subzone operators include Giant Industries, in 2006 focused on educating economic development Inc., which operates a crude oil refinery and Canon officials, freight forwarders, and global businesses. Virginia, Inc. which manufactures printers, cartridges, and related products. No. 238 Dublin, Virginia FTZ No. 238 maintains 0 subzones and serves 1 No. 137 Dulles International Airport business. The site provided temporary storage for cargo, (Washington, DC), Virginia which was re-exported in 2008. FTZ No. 137 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. Educational and promotional efforts are underway to attract future companies in the region that are involved in international trade. Washington

Foreign-Trade Zones: 13 Exports: $0.13 billion Active Firms: 22 Annual Volume: $7.07 billion Employment: 2,605 Active Subzones: 4

Washington Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 5 Seattle 15 7.92 7.49 1 0 No. 85 Everett (Puget Sound) 8 4.35 3.53 2 0 No. 86 Tacoma (Puget Sound) 1,589 4,283.83 96.40 12 2 No. 120 Cowitz (Longview) 5 0.00 0.00 1 0 No. 128 Whatcom County [Lummi Tribe] (Bellingham) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 129 Whatcom County (Bellingham) 600 2,721.03 0.01 3 1 No. 130 Whatcom County (Blaine) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 131 Whatcom County (Sumas) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 173 Grays Harbor (Aberdeen - Hoquaim) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 203 Moses Lake 324 33.82 23.35 2 1 No. 212 Tacoma [Puyallup Tribe] 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 216 Olympia 64 20.92 0.00 1 0 No. 224 Spokane 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 13 2,605 7,071.87 130.77 22 4

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (Washington 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in Washington decreased 8000 2005 1.1% from $7.15 billion in 2005 to $7.07 billion in 7000 2006 2006. 6000 5000

Exports from Washington FTZs increased 46.6% 4000 from $89.2 million in 2005 to $130.77 million in 3000 2006. This increase is due to increased shipments 2000 and higher prices of oil in the Anacortes Oil Refinery 1000 complex located in FTZ No. 86, as well as an increase 0 Annual Volume Exports in shipments from subzone 203A, Takata-Inflation Systems Inc. Exports of manufactured commodities from Washington increased 50.2% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* Zone Development Employment Percentage Changes (Washington 2005-2006)

Jobs associated with Washington FTZs increased 6.0% 1.8% over the past year to 2,605 in 2006. Total 4.0% nonfarm employment in Washington increased by 2.9% 2.9% 1.8% over the past fiscal year. 2.0%

0.0% FTZ Employment State Employment

-2.0%

-4.0%

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Washington Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 5 Seattle, Washington No. 120 Cowlitz (Longview), Washington FTZ No. 5 maintains 0 subzones and serves 1 business, FTZ No. 120 maintains 0 subzones and serves 1 Fairn & Swanson. The grantee continues to seek business, though use of the zone is minimal. The Port similar tenants to use the zone for receiving, storage, of Longview has plans to provide an additional 120 and transshipment of duty free vessel supplies in the acres to support a grain elevator and export facility growing cruise ship trade. in the industrial park. The Port of Longview now has a fully looped rail system which should better serve No. 85 Everett (Puget Sound), Washington industrial clients. The grantee and operator continue to FTZ No. 85 maintains 0 subzones and serves 2 aggressively market the zone. businesses. While the zone’s activity was less than last year’s, the value of items stored increased. Last year’s No. 128 Whatcom County [Lummi Tribe] acquisition of three shipping lines using the Port as a (Bellingham), Washington regular port of call led to a second customer’s use of FTZ No. 128 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 the zone in 2006. The Port actively markets the FTZ to businesses. No FY 2006 statistics are available from businesses in the Puget Sound area. FTZ No. 128.

No. 86 Tacoma (Puget Sound), Washington No. 129 Whatcom County (Bellingham), Washington FTZ No. 86 maintains 2 subzones and serves 12 FTZ No. 129 maintains 1 subzone and serves 3 businesses. The GPZ is used primarily for warehousing businesses. Subzone 129A operator, BP Products, and distribution. Manufacturing activity within the GPZ accounts for all of the zone activity. The GPZ operator involves the installation of domestic status components anticipates that businesses in Western Canada will use in foreign status motor vehicles. The subzones serve the FTZ to facilitate imports. the Anacortes Oil Refinery and Panasonic Shikoku No. 130 Whatcom County (Blaine), Washington Electronics Corporation. Exports from FTZ No. 86 FTZ No. 130 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 decreased during FY 2006 as a result of a decrease in businesses. zone users. No. 131 Whatcom County (Sumas), Washington FTZ No. 131 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. Washington Foreign-Trade Zones

FTZ No. 173 Grays Harbor No. 212 Tacoma [Puyallup Tribe], Washington (Aberdeen - Hoquiam), Washington FTZ No. 212 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 FTZ No. 173 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. businesses. While the zone is equipped for the storage No. 216 Olympia, Washington of slings used to load lumber onto foreign vessels, FTZ No. 216 maintains 0 subzones and serves 1 market conditions and low worldwide lumber prices business, WestFarm Foods. The firm is the operator resulted in no zone activity. The grantee expects volume of Site 13, which houses a facility that operates as a to be low in 2007 as well. dairy processing plant and an outsourced cold storage FTZ No. 203 Moses Lake, Washington warehouse. In April 2006, an additional site within the FTZ No. 203 maintains 1 subzone and serves 2 GPZ was approved for activation. businesses: Takata - Inflation Systems, Inc. (ISI) and No. 224 Spokane, Washington Chemi-Con Materials, Inc. Chemi-Con manipulates, FTZ No. 224 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 oxides, and cuts rolls of imported etched capacitor foil, businesses. The GPZ is activated, but it has not yet while ISI produces propellant and assembles inflators for received a user. The grantee diligently markets the FTZ automobiles. Employment within the GPZ decreased due throughout the region and hopes to attract international to operational improvements in efficiency. air cargo companies. The zone’s marketing efforts include articles, engagement with targeted potential users, and presentations to elected officials.

West Virginia

Foreign-Trade Zones: 3 Exports: $3.57 million Active Firms: 2 Annual Volume: $395.57 million Employment: 1,624 Active Subzones: 2

West Virginia Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 228 Wood/Jackson Counties (Charleston) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 No. 229 Charleston 1,624 395.57 3.57 2 2 No. 240 Martinsburg (Front Royal) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 3 1,624 395.57 3.57 2 2

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports (West Virginia 2005-2006) $ millions The volume of FTZ activity in West Virginia 450 2005 400 decreased 6.6% from $423.42 million in 2005 to 2006 350 $395.57 million in 2006. 300 250 Exports from West Virginia FTZs increased 11.2% 200 from $3.21 million in 2005 to $3.57 million in 2006. 150 Exports of manufactured commodities from West Virginia 100 increased 1.7% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* 50 0 Annual Volume Exports Jobs associated with West Virginia FTZs increased 7.1% over the past year, reaching 1,624 in 2006. Total nonfarm employment in West Virginia increased by 1.1% Employment Percentage Changes (West Virginia 2005-2006) over the past fiscal year. 10.0%

8.0% 7.1%

6.0%

4.0%

2.0% 1.1%

0.0% FTZ Employment State Employment

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. West Virginia Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 228 Wood/Jackson Counties No. 240 Martinsburg (Front Royal), West Virginia (Charleston), West Virginia FTZ No. 240 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 FTZ No. 228 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 businesses. A number of companies are located within businesses. the zone, but are not pursuing zone services. The zone operator continues to pursue opportunities for its GPZ. No. 229 Charleston, West Virginia FTZ No. 229 maintains 2 subzones and serves 2 businesses. The GPZ remains inactive. Toyota Motor Manufacturing West Virginia produces 4-cylinder and 6-cylinder engines, as well as 5 speed automatic transmissions. E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, Inc. manufactures, tests, packages, and stores various intermediate products for crop protection markets. Annual volume at the zone dropped due to a decrease in production by Toyota Motor Manufacturing. Wisconsin

Foreign-Trade Zones: 3 Exports: $61.40 million Active Firms: 5 Annual Volume: $525.92 million Employment: 1,842 Active Subzones: 3

Wisconsin Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 41 Milwaukee 1,517 450.08 61.23 3 1 No. 167 Brown County (Green Bay) 325 75.84 0.17 2 2 No. 266 Dane County (Madison) 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 3 1,842 525.92 61.40 5 3

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Annual Volume and Exports $ millions (Wisconsin 2005-2006) The volume of FTZ activity in Wisconsin decreased 700 2005 14.8% from $617.38 million in 2005 to $525.92 million 600 2006 in 2006. 500

400 Exports from Wisconsin FTZs decreased 60.6% from 300 $155.65 million in 2005 to $61.40 million in 2006, 200 due to the dramatic decrease in activity in FTZ No. 41. 100 Exports of manufactured commodities from Wisconsin 0 increased 21.0% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.* Annual Volume Exports

Jobs associated with Wisconsin FTZs decreased Employment Percentage Changes 9.9% over the past year, reaching 1,842 in 2006. (Wisconsin 2005-2006)

In contrast, total nonfarm employment in Wisconsin 2.0% 0.8% increased by 0.8% over the past fiscal year. FTZ Employment 0.0% State Employment -2.0%

-4.0%

-6.0%

-8.0%

-10.0% -9.9% -12.0%

Source: Foreign-Trade Zone Board, U.S. Department of Commerce; and U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Wisconsin Foreign-Trade Zones

No. 41 Milwaukee, Wisconsin No. 167 Brown County (Green Bay), Wisconsin FTZ No. 41 maintains 1 subzone and serves 3 FTZ No. 167 maintains 2 subzones and serves 2 businesses. The GPZ had a 75% decline in product businesses engaged in manufacturing: Polaris Industries movement associated with decreased demand by and Robin Manufacturing U.S.A., Inc. There was no General Electric Medical Services, the only full-time activity in the GPZ in 2006. The grantee markets the user of the GPZ. However, the zone operator continues zone to companies interested in subzone status in the to broaden its international services, specifically in northeast quadrant of Wisconsin. ocean container handling, transportation, storage, and No. 266 Dane County (Madison), Wisconsin inspections. The subzone is used by Mercury Marine FTZ No. 266 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 for the importation of engine parts that produce marine businesses. The FTZ was approved in December of propulsion engines. 2005, but the zone has yet to be activated. Wyoming

Foreign-Trade Zones: 1 Exports: $0.00 billion Active Firms: 0 Annual Volume: $0.00 billion Employment: 0 Active Subzones: 0

Wyoming Foreign-Trade Zones and Subzones

Annual Volume Exports Active Active FTZ Location Employment ($ millions) ($ millions) Firms Subzones No. 157 Casper 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 Total 1 0 0.00 0.00 0 0

Source: 2006 Annual Reports submitted by grantees to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce. NOTE: All categories include both general purpose and subzone activity. Annual volume is considered to be received merchandise from the FTZs, including goods of domestic origin and foreign status, as well as zone-to-zone transfers. Cities in parentheses are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ports of entry. * Exports of manufactured commodities below are as reported by the Foreign Trade Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

Zone Development Wyoming Foreign-Trade Zones The volume of FTZ activity in Wyoming remained at zero. No. 157 Casper, Wyoming FTZ No. 157 maintains 0 subzones and serves 0 Exports from Wyoming FTZs remained at zero. businesses. No statistics for FY 2006 are available from Exports of manufactured commodities from Wyoming FTZ No. 157. decreased 67.0% during the 2005-2006 calendar year.*

Jobs associated with Wyoming FTZs remained at zero. Total nonfarm employment in Wyoming increased by 4.7% over the past fiscal year.

National Association of Foreign-Trade Zones 1001 Connecticut Avenue, Suite 350 Washington, DC 20036 202-331-1950 www.naftz.org

FY 2006