Arxiv:2010.09064V2 [Gr-Qc] 24 Dec 2020 Hoy[,3.Snetesmnltnhriisppr[4] Paper Tangherlini’S Seminal That Known the Is Since It 3]

Home , Thermal time scale

arXiv:2010.09064v2 [gr-qc] 24 Dec 2020 hoy[,3.SnetesmnlTnhriisppr[4] paper Tangherlini’s seminal that known the is Since it 3]. [2, theory rishsbe eetysgetdi 1 ihntecor- the within [1] of in gravitation between suggested respondence recently been circula stable has of interpretation orbits asymptot- the for holes case, black Sitter around AdS de ically motion the Unlike for cos- objects. insignificant positive compact cos- are the example, constant, the for mological when as, such context, factors, astrophysical mological the in interesting smttclyASsaeie and spacetimes AdS asymptotically inlaypoial d lc oe nteEinstein- the curva- in higher other holes and Einstein-Lovelock black Gauss-Bonnet, dimen- AdS higher of asymptotically the analysis on via sional described coupling be cou- intermediate could of large side regime at CFT the AdS/CFT that via so obtained pling, correc- results represent the may to action tions Einstein the to added terms theory dual the in excitations bulk states the metastable [1]. and ther- as scale not interpreted time does are thermal state a dual on the malize these that of suggests existence The orbits stable [1]. stable found where been holes, have black orbits [5], AdS circular case asymptotically same dS for The asymptotically not dimensional orbits. but higher circular for stable true for is allow so- not Reissner-Nordström do lutions and Schwarzschild of analogues ∗ † [email protected] [email protected] oino atce nbakhl pctmsi usually is spacetimes black-hole in particles of Motion ttesm ie ti xetdta higher-curvature that expected is it time, same the At asv atce nteEnti-oeokat-eSitte Einstein-Lovelock-anti-de the in particles Massive 4 etod aeáia optçoeCgiã CC) Univer (CMCC), Cognição e Computação Matemática, de Centro ASnmes 04.50.Kd,04.50.-h,04.70.Bw numbers: PACS univ a implying theory. case, Lovelock Schwarzschild-AdS any the sho in We as e frequencies. power analytical oscillation same general radial the and find t We orbits corrections circular show Lovelock hole. curvature black We the higher from of theory. distance kind Einstein-Lovelock the any the of for in background case, holes the in black state (AdS) particles metastable massive as interpreted of be motion can doe corr state excitations AdS/CFT dual bulk the the that the of indicates context orbits the stable of in existence proposed recently been has nitrrtto otepyiso tbegoeiso mass of geodesics stable of physics the to interpretation An .INTRODUCTION I. > D 3 4 nttt fPyis nvriyo lebr,D211Old D-26111 Oldenburg, of University Physics, of Institute iesoa smttclyflat asymptotically dimensional ilkoMkaaSre,Mso 118 usa Federat Russian 117198, Moscow Street, Miklukho-Maklaya 6 2 epe redhpUiest fRsi RD University) (RUDN Russia of University Friendship Peoples 1 u blço E:02010 at nr,S,Brazil SP, André, Santo 09210-180, CEP: Abolição, Rua eerhCnr o hoeia hsc n Astrophysics, and Physics Theoretical for Centre Research erčv á.1,C-40 pv,CehRepublic Czech Opava, CZ-74601 13, nám. Bezručovo nttt fPyis ieinUiest nOpava, in University Silesian Physics, of Institute ( .A Konoplya A. R. D D dmninlfield -dimensional 1) + -dimensional ,2, 1, r ∗ n .Zhidenko A. and oeokter,ipyn nvra cln ihthe any with coupling for intermediate scaling the power considering universal same when a temperature the implying has theory, the frequency Lovelock to orbit correction dominant AdS The pure derived. circular-orbit cir are ex- near the orbits the cular analytical of of frequency The values radial-oscillation and asymptotic frequency hole. the black for the pression from sufficiently distance for large occur which hole, black Einstein-Lovelock r loe o n smttclyAdS asymptotically orbits stable any the for that allowed show we are Love- Here their generalization. and lock holes black Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet AdS h ulter nteohrsd,w ol iet anal- to like the would of we orbits side, in other correc- circular regime the curvature yse on coupling higher theory intermediate metastable of dual the the and of achieving side, description for cir- one dual tions stable the for mind on of AdS in states interpretation Having in orbits of far. cular motivations so above considered been the not have time h aeo edsc n tblt fpril orbits particle of stability and geodesics four- the the of in time, for same case [22] the At in the case. back- and AdS [21] asymptotically hole in dimensional considered black were Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet ground flat totically black-hole stable the by only. that constrained configurations so be regime, always this be in must under cannot one description the metric dual of hole the for values black used the some that at [12–20]. means background enough parameters, the small occurs of which are instability constants spacetime The dynami- coupling hole black the is the unless theory of Einstein-Lovelock instability the cal considering in when point holes essential black An [6–11]. theories ture h ulgoeisi h ihrdmninlasymp- dimensional higher the in geodesics null The D httecrepnigcreto a the has correction corresponding the that w o hraieo hra iesaeand scale time thermal a on thermalize not s dmninlaypoial nid Sitter anti-de asymptotically -dimensional D nteda edter.Hr estudy we Here theory. field dual the in s hr perasal iclrobta a at orbit circular stable a appear there pesosfrtefeuniso distant of frequencies the for xpressions dmninlEnti-as-ontASspace- Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet-AdS -dimensional v atce nbakhl backgrounds hole black in particles ive ra cln ihtetmeauefor temperature the with scaling ersal sodne twsage htthe that argued was It espondence. a,ulk h smttclyflat asymptotically the unlike hat, iaeFdrld B (UFABC), ABC do Federal sidade ,4, 3, nug Germany enburg, † lc oespacetime hole black r ion D , dmninlasymptotically -dimensional D -dimensional - 2 in the dual theory. The generic D-dimensional static and maximally sym- The paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II we give metric metric is given by the line element the basic information about the black hole metric in the Einstein-Lovelock gravity. Sec. III is devoted to deduc- 2 − − 2 2 1 2 2 2 ds = (1 r ψ(r))dt + dr + r dΩn, (3) tion of the asymptotic expansion for the metric function 1 − r2ψ(r) which we will use. In Sec. IV we derive the equations 2 − of motion, the effective potential and the associated fre- where dΩn is a (n = D 2)-dimensional sphere, and the quencies. Finally, in sec. V we summarize the obtained function ψ(r) satisfies an algebraic equation [25] results. 2M W [ψ(r)] = , (4) rD−1 II. SPHERICALLY SYMMETRIC BLACK where HOLES IN THE LOVELOCK THEORY 2Λ m W [ψ]= − + ψ + α ψm, (5) (D − 1)(D − 2) m The Einstein-Lovelock theory is the most general met- m=2 X ric theory of gravity keeping the diffeomorphism invari- 2 −2 α (D − 3)! α m e ance and yielding second-order equations of motion in an α = m = m (D − 2 − p), m m (D − 2m − 1)! m arbitrary number of spacetime dimensions D. In D = 4 p=1 it coincides with the Einstein gravity, while in D =5, 6 it Y is represented by the (quadratic in curvature) Einstein- ande the arbitrary constant M defines the asymptotic Gauss-Bonnet Lagrangian. Higher D require corrections mass [26], which are higher than the second order in curvature. (D − 2)πD/2−3/2 The Einstein-Lovelock theory is given by the La- M = M. (6) grangian density [23], 4Γ(D/2 − 1/2)

m 1 α L = −2Λ+ m δµ1ν1µ2ν2...µmνm (1) III. ASYMPTOTICALLY ADS BLACK HOLES 2m m λ1σ1λ2σ2...λmσm m=1 X × λ1σ1 λ2σ2 λmσm Rµ1ν1 Rµ2ν2 ...Rµmνm , We further assume that the cosmological constant is negative, where 2Λ 1 δµ1 δµ1 ··· δµ1 = − , (7) ν1 ν2 νp (D − 1)(D − 2) L2 µ2 µ2 ··· µ2 δν1 δν2 δνp δµ1µ2...µp = det   ν1ν2...νp . . . . and the spacetime is asymptotically AdS with the radius . . .. .  µp µp µp  R [17],  δ 1 δ 2 ··· δ   ν ν νp    → ∞ − 1 is the generalized totally antisymmetric Kronecker delta, ψ(r )= 2 . (8) λσ R Rµν is the Riemann tensor, α1 = 1/8πG = 1, and α2, α3, α4,... are arbitrary constants of the theory. Considering the limit r → ∞ in (4) we obtain relation The Euler-Lagrange equations have the following form between L and R, [24]: m 1 1 m αm m − 2 = 2 + ( 1) 2m , (9) µ 1 αm µµ1ν1µ2ν2...µmνm L R R 0=Λδ − δ (2) m=2 ν 2m+1 m νλ1σ1λ2σ2...λmσm X m=1 e X so that for the αm =0, L = R. ×R λ1σ1 R λ2σ2 ...R λmσm . µ1ν1 µ2ν2 µmνm Calculating derivative of (4), we find The antisymmetric tensor is nonzero only when the e M ′ ′ 2 indices µ,µ1,ν1,µ2,ν2,...µ ,ν are all distinct. Thus, W [ψ(r)]ψ (r)= −(D − 1) < 0 . (10) m m rD the general Lovelock theory is such that 2m is smaller than the number of spacetime dimensions D. In partic- We notice that for the nonsingular solution W ′[ψ(r)] can- ular, in D = 4 spacetime the Lovelock theorem implies not cross zero and is positive at the horizon once we re- that m = 1, which is equivalent to the Einstein theory quire positiveness of Hawking temperature [17]. [23]. When D = 5 or 6, m = 2 (Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Finally, we can find the asymptotic expansion for ψ(r), theory), implying that the correction to the Einstein action is quadratic in curvature and a new appropriate non- 1 2M1 2M2 1 ψ(r)= − + + + O , (11) vanishing coupling constant α2 appears. R2 rD−1 r2D−2 r3D−3 3 where type of the Einstein-Lovelock theory. The second deriva- M M tive of the effective potential can be reduced to the fol- M lowing form 1 = ′ −2 = −2 −4 > 0 W [−R ] 1 − 2α2R +3α3R ... − 4 ′′ (12) ′′ 2 6 r ψ (r) − 2 ′ 2 ′′ V (r)= ℓ 4 µ (2ψ(r)+4rψ (r)+ r ψ (r)). and e e r 2 ′′ −2 3 M W [−R ] M1 6α3 Substituting (19) into the latter expression and expand- M2 = − = − 2α2 − ... . W ′[−R−2]3 M R2 ing it in powers of 1/r we find that e (13) 2 M M e 8µ 1 While 1 is always positive, 2 is zero in the Einstein V ′′(r)= + O . (20) R2 rD−3 theory (m =1) and, in the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory (m =2), M2 and α2 have opposite signs. With these expressions at hand we are ready to analyze Thus, the second derivative of the effective potential is motion of massive particles in this background. positive for sufficiently distant orbits in AdS. e The corresponding circular-orbit frequency,

− 2 ′ IV. PARTICLE MOTION dφ ℓ(1 r ψ(r)) − − rψ (r) ω = = 2 = ψ(r) (21) dt r e r 2 1 D − 3 1 Following [1], we consider geodesic motion of a particle = + M1R + O . R 2rD−1 r2D−2 of mass µ in the vicinity of the black hole (3), which is described by the following first-order equations: Thus, the dominant correction to the pure AdS orbit e = (1 − r2ψ(r))t˙ (14) frequency scales according to the same power law in any Lovelock theory, ℓ = r2φ˙ (15) 2 2 D−1 e =r ˙ + V (r), (16) − 2 2 D − 3 2 D − 3 Rℓ ωR ≃ 1+ M1R ≃ 1+ M1R . 2rD−1 2 µ where e and ℓ are integrals of motion (particle’s energy and angular momentum, respectively). Dots denote derivatives with respect to the affine parameter. The ef- Similarly to [1], for the binding energy we find the fective potential has the form following correction at large ℓ:

D−3 2 − 2 2 2 ℓ ℓ Rℓ V (r)=(1 − r ψ(r)) µ + . (17) e = ωdℓ ≃ + µ −M1 . r2 R µ Z On the circular orbits r˙ =0 and r¨ =0, and the corre- Finally, considering small oscillations δr near the sta- sponding radial coordinate satisﬁes ble orbit r, from (16) we ﬁnd

′ ′′ V (r)=0, (18) 2 V (r) 2 2eδe = δr˙ + δr , (22) 2 from which we ﬁnd the relation between the angular momentum and the coordinate, so that the radial-oscillation frequency in units of the coordinate time has the form ℓ2 2ψ(r)+ rψ′(r) = −r4 . (19) V ′′(r) 1 2 3 ′ 2 − 3 ′ − 4 ′′ µ 2+ r ψ (r) ωr = 2 = ψ(r)(8 + r ψ (r) r ψ (r)) (23) 2t˙ 2 Circular orbits exist (ℓ2 > 0) when the denominator of (19) is positive. The limiting orbit, +7rψ′(r)+2r4ψ′(r)2 + r2ψ′′(r) ! 3 ′ 2+ r ψ (r)=0, 4 D2 − 1 (D − 3)(D − 5) = −M1 −M1 + .... R2 R2rD−3 rD−1 corresponds to the circular null geodesic, satisfying (18) for µ =0. Hence it follows ′′ The circular orbit is stable, when V (r) > 0. In the −3 − D asymptotically ﬂat spacetime only unstable circular or- D2 − 1 Rℓ 2 ω R ≃ 2 −M1 . (24) bits exist for D > 4 in the Einstein [4] and Einstein- r 4 µ Gauss-Bonnet theories [27]. Here we show that the circular orbits at a large distance from the black hole are When higher than the second order in curvature cor- always stabilized in the asymptotically AdS case for any rections are tuned on and the parameters of the metric 4

V''HrL nate. Our extensive search for various Gauss-Bonnet and Lovelock corrections found no qualitatively new behav- 5 ior: stable orbits are allowed for any r > rISCO, where rISCO corresponds to the innermost (marginally stable) circular orbit. This is illustrated in Figs. 1, where the r 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 second derivative of the effective potential is shown for small, intermediate, and large (in comparison with the -5 AdS radius R) Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet black holes. It is essential that we were limited by the region of stabil- -10 ity of the background black hole against small spacetime perturbations. It is interesting to note that a particular type of insta- - 15 bility of the black holes in the Lovelock theory is closely V''HrL related to the causality of the corresponding space-time. In [28] it was shown that, in the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory, the violation of causality can take place for high- r energy scattering of gravitons due to the additional struc- 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 tures in the three-point vertex. This happens, in particular, in the vicinity of sufficiently small black holes, - 10 where, under some conditions, gravitons experience time advance, which can be used to build a “time machine” -20 [29]. This problem manifests itself at the classical level when considering linear gravitational perturbations. It was proven in [30] that, once the effective potential in - 30 the eikonal limit has negative gap, the black hole is unstable and the instability against perturbations with larger multipole numbers develops faster. Therefore, it V''HrL was called the eikonal instability [31]. At the same time 5 the corresponding black-hole perturbation equations be- come nonhyperbolic [32], causing a breakdown of the r well-posedness of the initial values problem [33]. A non- 160 180 200 220 240 260 linear analysis of the perturbed AdS space-time indicated -5 that such black holes cannot be formed [34], so that the corresponding thermal state in the dual theory does not -10 exist. However, when considering temporal evolution of massive or massless particles of test fields in the vicinity -15 of the Einstein-Lovelock black holes, there is no violation of causality. The corresponding effective potential (17) is -20 positive-definite everywhere outside the black hole, and the initial value problem is well-posed even for the grav- itationally unstable black holes. Thus, stable circular FIG. 1. Second derivative of the effective potential for D = orbits are allowed in the whole range of parameters of 5 Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet black holes. From top to bottom: the Einstein-Lovelock black-hole solutions (3) due to the −4 small black holes (rH = 1/10, R = 1), α2 = −9 · 10 , −3 · AdS confinement. Thereby, the above discussed viola- 4 4 4 3 10− , 5 · 10− , 13 · 10− , 2 · 10− ; intermediate black holes tion of causality does not manifest itself on motion of (rH = R = 1), α2 = −0.05, −0.01, 0.01, 0.05, 0.085; large e test particles. black holes (rH = 10, R = 1), α2 = −0.11, −0.05, 0.01, 0.07, 0.14. The first value of α corresponds to the lower threshold of instability ande the fifth value is the upper threshold of V. CONCLUSIONS black-hole instability. e

Having in mind possible interpretation within the are not specified, the metric functions of the Einstein- AdS/CFT correspondence [1], we have analyzed circular Lovelock black hole cannot be written in a closed analyt- orbits in the spacetime of the asymptotically AdS black ical form. Nevertheless, one can use the automatic code hole in the general Einstein-Lovelock theory. It is shown suggested in [17] in order to calculate the metric function that stable circular orbits exist independently of the par- and its derivatives numerically when the parameters are ticular choice of the Lovelock corrections or number of fixed. Then, the second derivative of the effective poten- spacetime dimensions D due to the confining effect of tial can be obtained for any value of the radial coordi- the AdS space, which leads to the stabilization of the 5 distant circular orbits. be an interesting problem for further consideration.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It is interesting to note that a conﬁning behavior was found when studying spectral problems in the asymptot- The authors acknowledge the support of the grant 19- ically Gödel spacetimes [35, 36]. Therefore, it cannot be 03950S of Czech Science Foundation (GAČR). A. Z. was excluded that similar stabilization of orbits may occur for supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, black holes immersed in a rotating Universe. This could Germany.

[1] D. Berenstein, Z. Li and J. Simon, Class. Quant. [arXiv:1701.01652 [hep-th]]. Grav. 29, 035008 (2012) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/abcaeb [17] R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, JCAP 1705, [arXiv:2009.04500 [hep-th]]. 050 (2017) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/05/050 [2] J. M. Maldacena, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, [arXiv:1705.01656 [hep-th]]. 1113 (1999) [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, [18] R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Dark 231 (1998)] doi:10.1023/A:1026654312961, Univ. 30, 100697 (2020) doi:10.1016/j.dark.2020.100697 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a1 [hep-th/9711200]. [arXiv:2003.12492 [gr-qc]]. [3] S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, [19] R. A. Konoplya and A. F. Zinhailo, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, Phys. Lett. B 428, 105 (1998) doi:10.1016/S0370- no.11, 1049 (2020) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08639-8 2693(98)00377-3 [hep-th/9802109]. [arXiv:2003.01188 [gr-qc]]. [4] F. R. Tangherlini, Nuovo Cim. 27, 636-651 (1963) [20] M. A. Cuyubamba, arXiv:2004.09025 [gr-qc]. doi:10.1007/BF02784569. [21] R. A. Konoplya and Z. Stuchlík, Phys. Lett. [5] E. Hackmann, V. Kagramanova, J. Kunz and B 771, 597 (2017) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.06.015 C. Lammerzahl, Phys. Rev. D 78, 124018 (2008) [arXiv:1705.05928 [gr-qc]]. Addendum: [Phys. Rev. D 79, no. 2, 029901 [22] K. Hegde, A. Naveena Kumara, C. L. A. Rizwan, (2009)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.029901, 10.1103/Phys- M. S. Ali and A. K. M, arXiv:2007.10259 [gr-qc]. RevD.78.124018 [arXiv:0812.2428 [gr-qc]]. [23] D. Lovelock, J. Math. Phys. 12, 498 (1971) [6] J. Casalderrey-Solana, S. Grozdanov and A. O. Starinets, doi:10.1063/1.1665613; J. Math. Phys. 13, 874 (1972) Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, no. 19, 191603 (2018) doi:10.1063/1.1666069. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.191603 [arXiv:1806.10997 [24] G. Koﬁnas and R. Olea, JHEP 0711, 069 (2007) [hep-th]]. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/069 [arXiv:0708.0782 [7] S. Grozdanov and A. O. Starinets, JHEP 1703, 166 [hep-th]]. (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2017)166 [arXiv:1611.07053 [25] R. G. Cai, Phys. Lett. B 582, 237 (2004) [hep-th]]. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.01.015 [hep-th/0311240]. [8] S. Grozdanov, N. Kaplis and A. O. Starinets, [26] R. C. Myers and J. Z. Simon, Phys. Rev. D 38, 2434 JHEP 1607, 151 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2016)151 (1988) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.38.2434. [arXiv:1605.02173 [hep-th]]. [27] B. Bhawal, Phys. Rev. D 42, 449-452 (1990) [9] R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, JHEP 1709, 139 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.42.449. (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2017)139 [arXiv:1705.07732 [28] X. O. Camanho, J. D. Edelstein, J. Malda- [hep-th]]. cena and A. Zhiboedov, JHEP 02, 020 (2016) [10] T. Andrade, J. Casalderrey-Solana and A. Ficnar, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2016)020 [arXiv:1407.5597 [hep- JHEP 1702, 016 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2017)016 th]]. [arXiv:1610.08987 [hep-th]]. [29] G. Papallo and H. S. Reall, JHEP 11, 109 (2015) [11] M. Brigante, H. Liu, R. C. Myers, S. Shenker and doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2015)109 [arXiv:1508.05303 [gr- S. Yaida, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 191601 (2008) qc]]. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.191601 [arXiv:0802.3318 [30] T. Takahashi and J. Soda, Prog. Theor. Phys. 124, 711- [hep-th]]. 729 (2010) doi:10.1143/PTP.124.711 [arXiv:1008.1618 [12] R. J. Gleiser and G. Dotti, Phys. Rev. D 72, [gr-qc]]. 124002 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.124002 [31] M. A. Cuyubamba, R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhi- [gr-qc/0510069]. denko, Phys. Rev. D 93, no.10, 104053 (2016) [13] G. Dotti and R. J. Gleiser, Phys. Rev. D 72, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.104053 [arXiv:1604.03604 [gr- 044018 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.044018 qc]]. [gr-qc/0503117]. [32] H. Reall, N. Tanahashi and B. Way, Class. Quant. Grav. [14] T. Takahashi and J. Soda, Class. Quant. Grav. 31, 205005 (2014) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/31/20/205005 29, 035008 (2012) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/3/035008 [arXiv:1406.3379 [hep-th]]. [arXiv:1108.5041 [hep-th]]. [33] G. Papallo and H. S. Reall, Phys. Rev. D 96, [15] T. Takahashi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 125, 1289 (2011) no.4, 044019 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.044019 doi:10.1143/PTP.125.1289 [arXiv:1102.1785 [gr-qc]]. [arXiv:1705.04370 [gr-qc]]. [16] R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D 95, [34] N. Deppe, A. Kolly, A. Frey and G. Kun- no. 10, 104005 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.104005 statter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 071102 (2015) 6

doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.071102 [arXiv:1410.1869 [arXiv:1103.4182 [gr-qc]]. [hep-th]]. [36] R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Lett. B 706, 451 (2012) [35] R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.11.037 [arXiv:1109.6215 84, 064028 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.064028 [hep-th]].