DOCSLIB.ORG

Understanding and Using the American Community Survey Public Use Microdata Sample Files What Data Users Need to Know

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Understanding and Using the American Community Survey Public Use Microdata Sample Files What Data Users Need to Know Understanding and Using the American Community Survey Public Use Microdata Sample Files What Data Users Need to Know Issued February 2021 Acknowledgments Linda A. Jacobsen, Vice President, U.S. Programs, Population Reference Bureau (PRB), and Mark Mather, Associate Vice President, U.S. Programs, PRB, drafted this handbook in partnership with the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey Office. Other PRB staff who assisted in drafting and reviewing the handbook include: Jean D’Amico, Lillian Kilduff, Kelvin Pollard, Paola Scommegna, and Alicia VanOrman. Some of the material in this handbook was adapted from the Census Bureau’s 2009 publication, A Compass for Understanding and Using American Community Survey Data: What PUMS Data Users Need to Know, drafted by Leonard M. Gaines. Nicole Scanniello, Gretchen Gooding, and Amanda Klimek, Census Bureau, contributed to the planning and review of this handbook. The American Community Survey program is under the direction of Albert E. Fontenot Jr., Associate Director for Decennial Census Programs, Deborah M. Stempowski, Assistant Director for Decennial Census Programs, and Donna M. Daily, Chief, American Community Survey Office. Other individuals from the Census Bureau who contributed to the review and release of these handbooks include Lydia Anderson, Aaron Basler, Sirius Fuller, William Hazard, KaNin Reese, Camille Ryan, Janice Valdisera, Tyson Weister, and Kai Wu. Faye E. Brock, Linda Chen, and Christine E. Geter provided publication management, graphic design and composition, and editorial review for the print and electronic media under the direction of Corey Beasley, Acting Chief of the Graphic and Editorial Services Branch, Public Information Office. Understanding and Using the American Community Survey Public Use Microdata Sample Files Issued February 2021 What Data Users Need to Know U.S. Department of Commerce Wynn Coggins, Acting Agency Head U.S. CENSUS BUREAU Dr. Ron Jarmin, Acting Director Suggested Citation U.S. Census Bureau, Understanding and Using the American Community Survey Public Use Microdata Sample Files: What Data Users Need to Know, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2021. U.S. CENSUS BUREAU Dr. Ron Jarmin, Acting Director Dr. Ron Jarmin, Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer Albert E. Fontenot Jr., Associate Director for Decennial Census Programs Deborah M. Stempowski, Assistant Director for Decennial Census Programs Donna M. Daily, Chief, American Community Survey Office Contents 1. ACS PUMS Files: The Basics ...........................................2 2. Public Use Microdata Areas ...........................................5 3. Accessing ACS PUMS Data. .9 4. Preparing ACS PUMS Data Files for Analysis ...........................12 5. Data Quality in the ACS PUMS. .17 6. Additional Resources ................................................19 Appendix: Linking Household Members Together .........................20 Understanding and Using the American Community Survey Public Use Microdata Sample Files iii U.S. Census Bureau What Data Users Need to Know iii This page is intentionally blank. UNDERSTANDING AND USING THE AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY PUBLIC USE MICRODATA SAMPLE FILES: WHAT DATA USERS NEED TO KNOW The U.S. Census Bureau produces a large number pooled across a calendar year to produce esti- of data profiles, tables, maps, and other products mates for that year. As a result, ACS estimates based on American Community Survey (ACS) reflect data that have been collected over a data. Even this abundance of pretabulated esti- period of time rather than for a single point in mates and data products cannot meet the needs time as in the decennial census, which is con- of every data user. The Census Bureau’s ACS ducted every 10 years and provides population Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) files enable counts as of April 1 of the census year. data users to create custom estimates and tables, free of charge, that are not available through ACS 1-year estimates are data that have been col- pretabulated ACS data products. lected over a 12-month period and are available for geographic areas with at least 65,000 people. This guide provides an overview of the ACS Starting with the 2014 ACS, the Census Bureau is PUMS files and how they can be used to access also producing “1-year Supplemental Estimates”— data about America’s communities. simplified versions of popular ACS tables—for geographic areas with at least 20,000 people. What Is the ACS? The Census Bureau combines 5 consecutive years of ACS data to produce multiyear estimates for The ACS is a nationwide survey designed to pro- geographic areas with fewer than 65,000 resi- vide communities with reliable and timely social, dents. These 5-year estimates represent data col- economic, housing, and demographic data every lected over a period of 60 months. year. A separate annual survey, called the Puerto Rico Community Survey (PRCS), collects similar For more detailed information about the ACS— data about the population and housing units in how to judge the accuracy of ACS estimates, Puerto Rico. The Census Bureau uses data col- understanding multiyear estimates, knowing lected in the ACS and the PRCS to provide esti- which geographic areas are covered in the ACS, mates on a broad range of population, housing and how to access ACS data on the Census unit, and household characteristics for states, Bureau’s Web site—see the Census Bureau’s counties, cities, school districts, congressional handbook on Understanding and Using American districts, census tracts, block groups, and many Community Survey Data: What All Data Users other geographic areas. Need to Know.1 The ACS has an annual sample size of about 3.5 1 U.S. Census Bureau, Understanding and Using American million addresses, with survey information col- Community Survey Data: What All Data Users Need to Know, <www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/guidance/handbooks lected nearly every day of the year. Data are /general.html>. Understanding and Using the American Community Survey Public Use Microdata Sample Files 1 U.S. Census Bureau What Data Users Need to Know 1 1. ACS PUMS FILES: THE BASICS The American Community Survey (ACS) microdata Protecting Confidentiality in the ACS consist of individual records with information about PUMS the characteristics of each person and housing unit in the survey. The ACS Public Use Microdata Sample Title 13 legally requires the Census Bureau to keep all (PUMS) includes a subsample of the ACS microdata, personal information strictly confidential.2 Examples of devoid of personalized information. The PUMS repre- measures taken to protect confidentiality in the PUMS sents about two-thirds of the responses collected in include: the ACS in a specific 1-year or 5-year period. • Using only a subset of the full ACS sample to cre- The U.S. Census Bureau produces ACS 1-year and ate the PUMS. 5-year PUMS files and typically releases these files 1 month after the release of the published ACS tables. • Excluding names, addresses, and any information The 5-year PUMS file is a combination of five 1-year that could be used to identify a specific housing PUMS files. The 1-year PUMS file includes records for unit, group quarters unit, or person. about 1 percent of the total population and the 5-year file includes records for about 5 percent of the total • “Swapping” (or exchanging) a small number of population. records with similar records from neighboring areas. TIP: While PUMS data allow for more detailed and com- • Top-coding or bottom-coding answers to selected plex research techniques, the files are more difficult to variables. Top-coding and bottom-coding involves work with than published tables. Data users need to use truncating extreme values for certain variables. statistical software, such as SPSS, SAS, R, or Stata, to A list of top-coded and bottom-coded val- process PUMS data, and the responsibility for produc- ues is available on the Census Bureau’s PUMS ing estimates from PUMS and judging their statistical Documentation Web page.3 significance is up to the data user. • Limiting the geographic areas that can be identi- fied in the PUMS. Data are available for the nation, regions, divisions, states, and Public Use Microdata There are two types of PUMS files, one for persons and Areas (PUMAs). The section on “Public Use one for housing units. The person-level file includes Microdata Areas” provides more information. records for people, including those who live in group quarter facilities such as nursing homes or college dorms. The housing-level files include records pertain- TIP: Due to confidentiality protections and the fact that ing to housing units, including vacant units. PUMS files are based on only about two-thirds of the ACS sample, estimates using the ACS PUMS may differ The ACS PUMS is a weighted sample, and weighting from estimates provided through the ACS Summary File variables must be used to generate estimates and stan- or other published Census Bureau tables and profiles. dard errors that represent the population. The PUMS You can verify that you have correctly accessed and files include both population weights and household tabulated data from the ACS PUMS file by replicat- weights. Population weights should be used to gener- ing the values presented in “PUMS Estimates for User ate statistics about individuals, and household weights Verification” in the PUMS Technical Documentation.⁴ should be used to generate statistics about housing units. (See the section on “Preparing ACS PUMS Data Files for Analysis” for more information.) 2 U.S. Census Bureau, Data Protection and Privacy, Title 13 - Protection of Confidential Information, <www.census.gov/about /policies/privacy/data_stewardship/title_13_-_protection_of _confidential_information.html>. 3 U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), PUMS Documentation, <www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/microdata /documentation.html>. ⁴ U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), PUMS Documentation, <www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/microdata /documentation.html>. 2 Understanding and Using the American Community Survey Public Use Microdata Sample Files 2 What Data Users Need to Know U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Statistical Inference: How Reliable Is a Survey?
    Math 203, Fall 2008: Statistical Inference: How reliable is a survey? Consider a survey with a single question, to which respondents are asked to give an answer of yes or no. Suppose you pick a random sample of n people, and you find that the proportion that answered yes isp ˆ. Question: How close isp ˆ to the actual proportion p of people in the whole population who would have answered yes? In order for there to be a reliable answer to this question, the sample size, n, must be big enough so that the sample distribution is close to a bell shaped curve (i.e., close to a normal distribution). But even if n is big enough that the distribution is close to a normal distribution, usually you need to make n even bigger in order to make sure your margin of error is reasonably small. Thus the first thing to do is to be sure n is big enough for the sample distribution to be close to normal. The industry standard for being close enough is for n to be big enough so that 1 − p 1 − p n > 9 and n > 9 p p both hold. When p is about 50%, n can be as small as 10, but when p gets close to 0 or close to 1, the sample size n needs to get bigger. If p is 1% or 99%, then n must be at least 892, for example. (Note also that n here depends on p but not on the size of the whole population.) See Figures 1 and 2 showing frequency histograms for the number of yes respondents if p = 1% when the sample size n is 10 versus 1000 (this data was obtained by running a computer simulation taking 10000 samples).
    [Show full text]
  • Hypothesis Testing with Two Categorical Variables 203
    Chapter 10 distribute or Hypothesis Testing With Two Categoricalpost, Variables Chi-Square copy, Learning Objectives • Identify the correct types of variables for use with a chi-square test of independence. • Explainnot the difference between parametric and nonparametric statistics. • Conduct a five-step hypothesis test for a contingency table of any size. • Explain what statistical significance means and how it differs from practical significance. • Identify the correct measure of association for use with a particular chi-square test, Doand interpret those measures. • Use SPSS to produce crosstabs tables, chi-square tests, and measures of association. 202 Part 3 Hypothesis Testing Copyright ©2016 by SAGE Publications, Inc. This work may not be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means without express written permission of the publisher. he chi-square test of independence is used when the independent variable (IV) and dependent variable (DV) are both categorical (nominal or ordinal). The chi-square test is member of the family of nonparametric statistics, which are statistical Tanalyses used when sampling distributions cannot be assumed to be normally distributed, which is often the result of the DV being categorical rather than continuous (we will talk in detail about this). Chi-square thus sits in contrast to parametric statistics, which are used when DVs are continuous and sampling distributions are safely assumed to be normal. The t test, analysis of variance, and correlation are all parametric. Before going into the theory and math behind the chi-square statistic, read the Research Examples for illustrations of the types of situations in which a criminal justice or criminology researcher would utilize a chi- square test.
    [Show full text]
  • Esomar/Grbn Guideline for Online Sample Quality
    ESOMAR/GRBN GUIDELINE FOR ONLINE SAMPLE QUALITY ESOMAR GRBN ONLINE SAMPLE QUALITY GUIDELINE ESOMAR, the World Association for Social, Opinion and Market Research, is the essential organisation for encouraging, advancing and elevating market research: www.esomar.org. GRBN, the Global Research Business Network, connects 38 research associations and over 3500 research businesses on five continents: www.grbn.org. © 2015 ESOMAR and GRBN. Issued February 2015. This Guideline is drafted in English and the English text is the definitive version. The text may be copied, distributed and transmitted under the condition that appropriate attribution is made and the following notice is included “© 2015 ESOMAR and GRBN”. 2 ESOMAR GRBN ONLINE SAMPLE QUALITY GUIDELINE CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE ................................................................................................... 4 2 DEFINITIONS .............................................................................................................................. 4 3 KEY REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................................ 6 3.1 The claimed identity of each research participant should be validated. .................................................. 6 3.2 Providers must ensure that no research participant completes the same survey more than once ......... 8 3.3 Research participant engagement should be measured and reported on ............................................... 9 3.4 The identity and personal
    [Show full text]
  • SAMPLING DESIGN & WEIGHTING in the Original
    Appendix A 2096 APPENDIX A: SAMPLING DESIGN & WEIGHTING In the original National Science Foundation grant, support was given for a modified probability sample. Samples for the 1972 through 1974 surveys followed this design. This modified probability design, described below, introduces the quota element at the block level. The NSF renewal grant, awarded for the 1975-1977 surveys, provided funds for a full probability sample design, a design which is acknowledged to be superior. Thus, having the wherewithal to shift to a full probability sample with predesignated respondents, the 1975 and 1976 studies were conducted with a transitional sample design, viz., one-half full probability and one-half block quota. The sample was divided into two parts for several reasons: 1) to provide data for possibly interesting methodological comparisons; and 2) on the chance that there are some differences over time, that it would be possible to assign these differences to either shifts in sample designs, or changes in response patterns. For example, if the percentage of respondents who indicated that they were "very happy" increased by 10 percent between 1974 and 1976, it would be possible to determine whether it was due to changes in sample design, or an actual increase in happiness. There is considerable controversy and ambiguity about the merits of these two samples. Text book tests of significance assume full rather than modified probability samples, and simple random rather than clustered random samples. In general, the question of what to do with a mixture of samples is no easier solved than the question of what to do with the "pure" types.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 1: Why Do We Use Statistics, Populations, Samples, Variables, Why Do We Use Statistics?
    1pops_samples.pdf Michael Hallstone, Ph.D. [email protected] Lecture 1: Why do we use statistics, populations, samples, variables, why do we use statistics? • interested in understanding the social world • we want to study a portion of it and say something about it • ex: drug users, homeless, voters, UH students Populations and Samples Populations, Sampling Elements, Frames, and Units A researcher defines a group, “list,” or pool of cases that she wishes to study. This is a population. Another definition: population = complete collection of measurements, objects or individuals under study. 1 of 11 sample = a portion or subset taken from population funny circle diagram so we take a sample and infer to population Why? feasibility – all MD’s in world , cost, time, and stay tuned for the central limits theorem...the most important lecture of this course. Visualizing Samples (taken from) Populations Population Group you wish to study (Mostly made up of “people” in the Then we infer from sample back social sciences) to population (ALWAYS SOME ERROR! “sampling error” Sample (a portion or subset of the population) 4 This population is made up of the things she wishes to actually study called sampling elements. Sampling elements can be people, organizations, schools, whales, molecules, and articles in the popular press, etc. The sampling element is your exact unit of analysis. For crime researchers studying car thieves, the sampling element would probably be individual car thieves – or theft incidents reported to the police. For drug researchers the sampling elements would be most likely be individual drug users. Inferential statistics is truly the basis of much of our scientific evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Socio-Demographic Sample Composition in ESS Round 61
    Assessment of socio-demographic sample composition in ESS Round 61 Achim Koch GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim/Germany, June 2016 Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Assessing socio-demographic sample composition with external benchmark data 3 3. The European Union Labour Force Survey 3 4. Data and variables 6 5. Description of ESS-LFS differences 8 6. A summary measure of ESS-LFS differences 17 7. Comparison of results for ESS 6 with results for ESS 5 19 8. Correlates of ESS-LFS differences 23 9. Summary and conclusions 27 References 1 The CST of the ESS requests that the following citation for this document should be used: Koch, A. (2016). Assessment of socio-demographic sample composition in ESS Round 6. Mannheim: European Social Survey, GESIS. 1. Introduction The European Social Survey (ESS) is an academically driven cross-national survey that has been conducted every two years across Europe since 2002. The ESS aims to produce high- quality data on social structure, attitudes, values and behaviour patterns in Europe. Much emphasis is placed on the standardisation of survey methods and procedures across countries and over time. Each country implementing the ESS has to follow detailed requirements that are laid down in the “Specifications for participating countries”. These standards cover the whole survey life cycle. They refer to sampling, questionnaire translation, data collection and data preparation and delivery. As regards sampling, for instance, the ESS requires that only strict probability samples should be used; quota sampling and substitution are not allowed. Each country is required to achieve an effective sample size of 1,500 completed interviews, taking into account potential design effects due to the clustering of the sample and/or the variation in inclusion probabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Human Subjects Protection Issues Related to Large Sample Surveys
    Summary of Human Subjects Protection Issues Related to Large Sample Surveys U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics Joan E. Sieber June 2001, NCJ 187692 U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs John Ashcroft Attorney General Bureau of Justice Statistics Lawrence A. Greenfeld Acting Director Report of work performed under a BJS purchase order to Joan E. Sieber, Department of Psychology, California State University at Hayward, Hayward, California 94542, (510) 538-5424, e-mail [email protected]. The author acknowledges the assistance of Caroline Wolf Harlow, BJS Statistician and project monitor. Ellen Goldberg edited the document. Contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Bureau of Justice Statistics or the Department of Justice. This report and others from the Bureau of Justice Statistics are available through the Internet — http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2 Limitations of the Common Rule with respect to survey research 2 2. Risks and benefits of participation in sample surveys 5 Standard risk issues, researcher responses, and IRB requirements 5 Long-term consequences 6 Background issues 6 3. Procedures to protect privacy and maintain confidentiality 9 Standard issues and problems 9 Confidentiality assurances and their consequences 21 Emerging issues of privacy and confidentiality 22 4. Other procedures for minimizing risks and promoting benefits 23 Identifying and minimizing risks 23 Identifying and maximizing possible benefits 26 5. Procedures for responding to requests for help or assistance 28 Standard procedures 28 Background considerations 28 A specific recommendation: An experiment within the survey 32 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Experiments
    IU Workshop in Methods – 2019 Survey Experiments Testing Causality in Diverse Samples Trenton D. Mize Department of Sociology & Advanced Methodologies (AMAP) Purdue University Survey Experiments Page 1 Survey Experiments Page 2 Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................................ 8 Overview .............................................................................................................................................................................. 8 What is a survey experiment? .................................................................................................................................... 9 What is an experiment?.............................................................................................................................................. 10 Independent and dependent variables ................................................................................................................. 11 Experimental Conditions ............................................................................................................................................. 12 WHY CONDUCT A SURVEY EXPERIMENT? ........................................................................................................................... 13 Internal, external, and construct validity ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Survey Questions Question
    What Respondents Do to Answer a Evaluating Survey Questions Question • Comprehend Question • Retrieve Information from Memory Chase H. Harrison Ph.D. • Summarize Information Program on Survey Research • Report an Answer Harvard University Problems in Answering Survey Problems in Answering Survey Questions Questions – Failure to comprehend – Failure to recall • If respondents don’t understand question, they • Questions assume respondents have information cannot answer it • If respondents never learned something, they • If different respondents understand question cannot provide information about it differently, they end up answering different questions • Problems with researcher putting more emphasis on subject than respondent Problems in Answering Survey Problems in Answering Survey Questions Questions – Problems Summarizing – Problems Reporting Answers • If respondents are thinking about a lot of things, • Confusing or vague answer formats lead to they can inconsistently summarize variability • If the way the respondent remembers something • Interactions with interviewers or technology can doesn’t readily correspond to the question, they lead to problems (sensitive or embarrassing may be inconsistemt responses) 1 Evaluating Survey Questions Focus Groups • Early stage • Qualitative research tool – Focus groups to understand topics or dimensions of measures • Used to develop ideas for questionnaires • Pre-Test Stage – Cognitive interviews to understand question meaning • Used to understand scope of issues – Pre-test under typical field
    [Show full text]
  • MRS Guidance on How to Read Opinion Polls
    What are opinion polls? MRS guidance on how to read opinion polls June 2016 1 June 2016 www.mrs.org.uk MRS Guidance Note: How to read opinion polls MRS has produced this Guidance Note to help individuals evaluate, understand and interpret Opinion Polls. This guidance is primarily for non-researchers who commission and/or use opinion polls. Researchers can use this guidance to support their understanding of the reporting rules contained within the MRS Code of Conduct. Opinion Polls – The Essential Points What is an Opinion Poll? An opinion poll is a survey of public opinion obtained by questioning a representative sample of individuals selected from a clearly defined target audience or population. For example, it may be a survey of c. 1,000 UK adults aged 16 years and over. When conducted appropriately, opinion polls can add value to the national debate on topics of interest, including voting intentions. Typically, individuals or organisations commission a research organisation to undertake an opinion poll. The results to an opinion poll are either carried out for private use or for publication. What is sampling? Opinion polls are carried out among a sub-set of a given target audience or population and this sub-set is called a sample. Whilst the number included in a sample may differ, opinion poll samples are typically between c. 1,000 and 2,000 participants. When a sample is selected from a given target audience or population, the possibility of a sampling error is introduced. This is because the demographic profile of the sub-sample selected may not be identical to the profile of the target audience / population.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Simple Random Sampling and Systematic Sampling
    Chapter 3: Simple Random Sampling and Systematic Sampling Simple random sampling and systematic sampling provide the foundation for almost all of the more complex sampling designs that are based on probability sampling. They are also usually the easiest designs to implement. These two designs highlight a trade-off inherent in all sampling designs: do we select sample units at random to minimize the risk of introducing biases into the sample or do we select sample units systematically to ensure that sample units are well- distributed throughout the population? Both designs involve selecting n sample units from the N units in the population and can be implemented with or without replacement. Simple Random Sampling When the population of interest is relatively homogeneous then simple random sampling works well, which means it provides estimates that are unbiased and have high precision. When little is known about a population in advance, such as in a pilot study, simple random sampling is a common design choice. Advantages: • Easy to implement • Requires little advance knowledge about the target population Disadvantages: • Imprecise relative to other designs if the population is heterogeneous • More expensive to implement than other designs if entities are clumped and the cost to travel among units is appreciable How it is implemented: • Select n sample units at random from N available in the population All units within the population must have the same probability of being selected, therefore each and every sample of size n drawn from the population has an equal chance of being selected. There are many strategies available for selecting a random sample.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evidence from World Values Survey Data
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive The return of religious Antisemitism? The evidence from World Values Survey data Tausch, Arno Innsbruck University and Corvinus University 17 November 2018 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/90093/ MPRA Paper No. 90093, posted 18 Nov 2018 03:28 UTC The return of religious Antisemitism? The evidence from World Values Survey data Arno Tausch Abstract 1) Background: This paper addresses the return of religious Antisemitism by a multivariate analysis of global opinion data from 28 countries. 2) Methods: For the lack of any available alternative we used the World Values Survey (WVS) Antisemitism study item: rejection of Jewish neighbors. It is closely correlated with the recent ADL-100 Index of Antisemitism for more than 100 countries. To test the combined effects of religion and background variables like gender, age, education, income and life satisfaction on Antisemitism, we applied the full range of multivariate analysis including promax factor analysis and multiple OLS regression. 3) Results: Although religion as such still seems to be connected with the phenomenon of Antisemitism, intervening variables such as restrictive attitudes on gender and the religion-state relationship play an important role. Western Evangelical and Oriental Christianity, Islam, Hinduism and Buddhism are performing badly on this account, and there is also a clear global North-South divide for these phenomena. 4) Conclusions: Challenging patriarchic gender ideologies and fundamentalist conceptions of the relationship between religion and state, which are important drivers of Antisemitism, will be an important task in the future. Multiculturalism must be aware of prejudice, patriarchy and religious fundamentalism in the global South.
    [Show full text]