DOCSLIB.ORG

PSD Code County Municipality School District Name

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

County Municipality School District Name Total Resident EIT PSD Code (percent) 010201 ADAMS ABBOTTSTOWN BORO CONEWAGO VALLEY S D 1.50 010601 ADAMS ARENDTSVILLE BORO UPPER ADAMS S D 1.60 010602 ADAMS BENDERSVILLE BORO UPPER ADAMS S D 1.60 010202 ADAMS BERWICK TWP CONEWAGO VALLEY S D 1.50 010603 ADAMS BIGLERVILLE BORO UPPER ADAMS S D 1.60 010203 ADAMS BONNEAUVILLE BORO CONEWAGO VALLEY S D 1.50 010501 ADAMS BONNEAUVILLE BORO LITTLESTOWN AREA S D 1.00 010604 ADAMS BUTLER TWP UPPER ADAMS S D 1.60 010301 ADAMS CARROLL VALLEY BORO FAIRFIELD AREA S D 1.50 010204 ADAMS CONEWAGO TWP CONEWAGO VALLEY S D 1.50 010401 ADAMS CUMBERLAND TWP GETTYSBURG AREA S D 1.70 010101 ADAMS EAST BERLIN BORO BERMUDIAN SPRINGS S D 1.70 010302 ADAMS FAIRFIELD BORO FAIRFIELD AREA S D 1.50 010402 ADAMS FRANKLIN TWP GETTYSBURG AREA S D 1.70 010403 ADAMS FREEDOM TWP GETTYSBURG AREA S D 1.70 010502 ADAMS GERMANY TWP LITTLESTOWN AREA S D 1.00 010404 ADAMS GETTYSBURG BORO GETTYSBURG AREA S D 1.70 010102 ADAMS HAMILTON TWP BERMUDIAN SPRINGS S D 1.70 010205 ADAMS HAMILTON TWP CONEWAGO VALLEY S D 1.50 010303 ADAMS HAMILTONBAN TWP FAIRFIELD AREA S D 1.50 010405 ADAMS HIGHLAND TWP GETTYSBURG AREA S D 1.70 010103 ADAMS HUNTINGTON TWP BERMUDIAN SPRINGS S D 1.70 010104 ADAMS LATIMORE TWP BERMUDIAN SPRINGS S D 1.70 010304 ADAMS LIBERTY TWP FAIRFIELD AREA S D 1.50 010503 ADAMS LITTLESTOWN BORO LITTLESTOWN AREA S D 1.00 010206 ADAMS MCSHERRYSTOWN BORO CONEWAGO VALLEY S D 1.50 010605 ADAMS MENALLEN TWP UPPER ADAMS S D 1.60 010406 ADAMS MT JOY TWP GETTYSBURG AREA S D 1.70 010504 ADAMS MT JOY TWP LITTLESTOWN AREA S D 1.00 010207 ADAMS MT PLEASANT TWP CONEWAGO VALLEY S D 1.50 010505 ADAMS MT PLEASANT TWP LITTLESTOWN AREA S D 1.00 010208 ADAMS NEW OXFORD BORO CONEWAGO VALLEY S D 1.50 010209 ADAMS OXFORD TWP CONEWAGO VALLEY S D 1.50 010105 ADAMS READING TWP BERMUDIAN SPRINGS S D 1.70 010210 ADAMS STRABAN TWP CONEWAGO VALLEY S D 1.50 010407 ADAMS STRABAN TWP GETTYSBURG AREA S D 1.70 010211 ADAMS TYRONE TWP CONEWAGO VALLEY S D 1.50 010606 ADAMS TYRONE TWP UPPER ADAMS S D 1.60 010506 ADAMS UNION TWP LITTLESTOWN AREA S D 1.00 010106 ADAMS YORK SPRINGS BORO BERMUDIAN SPRINGS S D 1.70 711101 ALLEGHENY ALEPPO TWP QUAKER VALLEY S D 1.00 710401 ALLEGHENY ASPINWALL BORO FOX CHAPEL AREA S D 1.00 710901 ALLEGHENY AVALON BORO NORTHGATE S D 1.00 730101 ALLEGHENY BALDWIN BORO BALDWIN-WHITEHALL S D 1.00 730102 ALLEGHENY BALDWIN TWP BALDWIN-WHITEHALL S D 1.00 711102 ALLEGHENY BELL ACRES BORO QUAKER VALLEY S D 1.00 710902 ALLEGHENY BELLEVUE BORO NORTHGATE S D 1.50 710201 ALLEGHENY BEN AVON BORO AVONWORTH S D 1.00 710202 ALLEGHENY BEN AVON HEIGHTS BORO AVONWORTH S D 1.00 730201 ALLEGHENY BETHEL PARK BORO BETHEL PARK S D 1.40 710402 ALLEGHENY BLAWNOX BORO FOX CHAPEL AREA S D 1.00 710601 ALLEGHENY BRACKENRIDGE BORO HIGHLANDS S D 1.00 721001 ALLEGHENY BRADDOCK BORO WOODLAND HILLS S D 1.10 721002 ALLEGHENY BRADDOCK HILLS BORO WOODLAND HILLS S D 1.00 710701 ALLEGHENY BRADFORD WOODS BORO NORTH ALLEGHENY S D 1.00 730301 ALLEGHENY BRENTWOOD BORO BRENTWOOD BORO S D 1.00 730501 ALLEGHENY BRIDGEVILLE BORO CHARTIERS VALLEY S D 1.00 730401 ALLEGHENY CARNEGIE BORO CARLYNTON S D 1.00 730202 ALLEGHENY CASTLE SHANNON BORO BETHEL PARK S D 1.00 730901 ALLEGHENY CASTLE SHANNON BORO KEYSTONE OAKS S D 1.00 721003 ALLEGHENY CHALFANT BORO WOODLAND HILLS S D 1.00 710101 ALLEGHENY CHESWICK BORO ALLEGHENY VALLEY S D 1.00 County Municipality School District Name Total Resident EIT PSD Code (percent) 721004 ALLEGHENY CHURCHILL BORO WOODLAND HILLS S D 1.00 730601 ALLEGHENY CLAIRTON CITY CLAIRTON CITY S D 1.50 730502 ALLEGHENY COLLIER TWP CHARTIERS VALLEY S D 1.00 730701 ALLEGHENY CORAOPOLIS BORO CORNELL S D 1.00 730402 ALLEGHENY CRAFTON BORO CARLYNTON S D 1.00 731101 ALLEGHENY CRESCENT TWP MOON AREA S D 1.00 730902 ALLEGHENY DORMONT BORO KEYSTONE OAKS S D 1.00 720401 ALLEGHENY DRAVOSBURG BORO MCKEESPORT AREA S D 1.00 730801 ALLEGHENY DUQUESNE CITY DUQUESNE CITY S D 1.65 710301 ALLEGHENY EAST DEER TWP DEER LAKES S D 1.00 720101 ALLEGHENY EAST MCKEESPORT BORO EAST ALLEGHENY S D 1.00 721005 ALLEGHENY EAST PITTSBURGH BORO WOODLAND HILLS S D 1.00 721006 ALLEGHENY EDGEWOOD BORO WOODLAND HILLS S D 1.00 711103 ALLEGHENY EDGEWORTH BORO QUAKER VALLEY S D 1.00 720201 ALLEGHENY ELIZABETH BORO ELIZABETH FORWARD S D 1.00 720202 ALLEGHENY ELIZABETH TWP ELIZABETH FORWARD S D 1.00 710203 ALLEGHENY EMSWORTH BORO AVONWORTH S D 1.00 711201 ALLEGHENY ETNA BORO SHALER AREA S D 1.00 710602 ALLEGHENY FAWN TWP HIGHLANDS S D 1.00 731801 ALLEGHENY FINDLAY TWP WEST ALLEGHENY S D 1.00 721007 ALLEGHENY FOREST HILLS BORO WOODLAND HILLS S D 1.00 720203 ALLEGHENY FORWARD TWP ELIZABETH FORWARD S D 1.00 710403 ALLEGHENY FOX CHAPEL BORO FOX CHAPEL AREA S D 1.00 710702 ALLEGHENY FRANKLIN PARK BORO NORTH ALLEGHENY S D 1.00 710302 ALLEGHENY FRAZER TWP DEER LAKES S D 1.00 720801 ALLEGHENY GLASSPORT BORO SOUTH ALLEGHENY S D 1.00 711108 ALLEGHENY GLEN OSBORNE BORO QUAKER VALLEY S D 1.00 711104 ALLEGHENY GLENFIELD BORO QUAKER VALLEY S D 1.00 730903 ALLEGHENY GREEN TREE BORO KEYSTONE OAKS S D 1.00 710501 ALLEGHENY HAMPTON TWP HAMPTON TOWNSHIP S D 1.00 710102 ALLEGHENY HARMAR TWP ALLEGHENY VALLEY S D 1.00 710603 ALLEGHENY HARRISON TWP HIGHLANDS S D 1.00 711105 ALLEGHENY HAYSVILLE BORO QUAKER VALLEY S D 1.00 730503 ALLEGHENY HEIDELBERG BORO CHARTIERS VALLEY S D 1.00 731501 ALLEGHENY HOMESTEAD BORO STEEL VALLEY S D 1.00 710404 ALLEGHENY INDIANA TWP FOX CHAPEL AREA S D 1.00 731001 ALLEGHENY INGRAM BORO MONTOUR S D 1.00 731901 ALLEGHENY JEFFERSON HILLS BORO WEST JEFFERSON HILLS S D 1.00 731002 ALLEGHENY KENNEDY TWP MONTOUR S D 1.00 710204 ALLEGHENY KILBUCK TWP AVONWORTH S D 1.00 711106 ALLEGHENY LEET TWP QUAKER VALLEY S D 1.00 711107 ALLEGHENY LEETSDALE BORO QUAKER VALLEY S D 1.00 720802 ALLEGHENY LIBERTY BORO SOUTH ALLEGHENY S D 1.00 720803 ALLEGHENY LINCOLN BORO SOUTH ALLEGHENY S D 1.00 710703 ALLEGHENY MARSHALL TWP NORTH ALLEGHENY S D 1.00 710704 ALLEGHENY MCCANDLESS TWP NORTH ALLEGHENY S D 1.00 ALLEGHENY MCDONALD BORO FORT CHERRY S D 1.00 731601 ALLEGHENY MCKEES ROCKS BORO STO-ROX S D 1.00 720402 ALLEGHENY MCKEESPORT CITY MCKEESPORT AREA S D 1.70 711202 ALLEGHENY MILLVALE BORO SHALER AREA S D 1.00 720301 ALLEGHENY MONROEVILLE BORO GATEWAY S D 1.50 731102 ALLEGHENY MOON TWP MOON AREA S D 1.00 700101 ALLEGHENY MOUNT OLIVER BORO PITTSBURGH S D 3.00 731201 ALLEGHENY MT LEBANON TWP MOUNT LEBANON S D 1.30 731502 ALLEGHENY MUNHALL BORO STEEL VALLEY S D 1.00 730702 ALLEGHENY NEVILLE TWP CORNELL S D 1.00 721008 ALLEGHENY NORTH BRADDOCK BORO WOODLAND HILLS S D 1.00 731802 ALLEGHENY NORTH FAYETTE TWP WEST ALLEGHENY S D 1.00 720102 ALLEGHENY NORTH VERSAILLES TWP EAST ALLEGHENY S D 1.00 731803 ALLEGHENY OAKDALE BORO WEST ALLEGHENY S D 1.00 720701 ALLEGHENY OAKMONT BORO RIVERVIEW S D 1.00 710405 ALLEGHENY OHARA TWP FOX CHAPEL AREA S D 1.30 County Municipality School District Name Total Resident EIT PSD Code (percent) 710205 ALLEGHENY OHIO TWP AVONWORTH S D 1.00 720501 ALLEGHENY PENN HILLS TWP PENN HILLS S D 1.75 731003 ALLEGHENY PENNSBURY VILLAGE BORO MONTOUR S D 1.00 711001 ALLEGHENY PINE TWP PINE-RICHLAND S D 1.00 720302 ALLEGHENY PITCAIRN BORO GATEWAY S D 1.00 730105 ALLEGHENY PITTSBURGH CITY BALDWIN-WHITEHALL S D 1.50 700102 ALLEGHENY PITTSBURGH CITY PITTSBURGH S D 3.00 730103 ALLEGHENY PLEASANT HILLS BORO BALDWIN-WHITEHALL S D 1.00 731902 ALLEGHENY PLEASANT HILLS BORO WEST JEFFERSON HILLS S D 1.00 720601 ALLEGHENY PLUM BORO PLUM BOROUGH S D 1.00 720804 ALLEGHENY PORT VUE BORO SOUTH ALLEGHENY S D 1.00 721009 ALLEGHENY RANKIN BORO WOODLAND HILLS S D 1.50 711203 ALLEGHENY RESERVE TWP SHALER AREA S D 1.00 711002 ALLEGHENY RICHLAND TWP PINE-RICHLAND S D 1.00 731004 ALLEGHENY ROBINSON TWP MONTOUR S D 1.00 710801 ALLEGHENY ROSS TWP NORTH HILLS S D 1.00 730403 ALLEGHENY ROSSLYN FARMS BORO CARLYNTON S D 1.00 730504 ALLEGHENY SCOTT TWP CHARTIERS VALLEY S D 1.00 711109 ALLEGHENY SEWICKLEY BORO QUAKER VALLEY S D 1.00 711110 ALLEGHENY SEWICKLEY HEIGHTS BORO QUAKER VALLEY S D 1.00 711111 ALLEGHENY SEWICKLEY HILLS BORO QUAKER VALLEY S D 1.00 711204 ALLEGHENY SHALER TWP SHALER AREA S D 1.00 710406 ALLEGHENY SHARPSBURG BORO FOX CHAPEL AREA S D 1.00 731301 ALLEGHENY SOUTH FAYETTE TWP SOUTH FAYETTE TWP S D 1.00 731401 ALLEGHENY SOUTH PARK TWP SOUTH PARK S D 1.00 720403 ALLEGHENY SOUTH VERSAILLES TWP MCKEESPORT AREA S D 1.00 710103 ALLEGHENY SPRINGDALE BORO ALLEGHENY VALLEY S D 1.00 710104 ALLEGHENY SPRINGDALE TWP ALLEGHENY VALLEY S D 1.00 731602 ALLEGHENY STOWE TWP STO-ROX S D 1.00 721010 ALLEGHENY SWISSVALE BORO WOODLAND HILLS S D 1.00 710604 ALLEGHENY TARENTUM BORO HIGHLANDS S D 1.00 731005 ALLEGHENY THORNBURG BORO MONTOUR S D 1.00 ALLEGHENY TRAFFORD BORO PENN-TRAFFORD S D 1.00 721011 ALLEGHENY TURTLE CREEK BORO WOODLAND HILLS S D 1.00 731701 ALLEGHENY UPPER ST CLAIR TWP UPPER ST CLAIR TWP S D 1.30 720702 ALLEGHENY VERONA BORO RIVERVIEW S D 1.00 720404 ALLEGHENY VERSAILLES BORO MCKEESPORT AREA S D 1.00 720103 ALLEGHENY WALL BORO EAST ALLEGHENY S D 1.00 710303 ALLEGHENY WEST DEER TWP DEER LAKES S D 1.00 731903 ALLEGHENY WEST ELIZABETH BORO WEST JEFFERSON HILLS S D 1.00 731503 ALLEGHENY WEST HOMESTEAD BORO STEEL VALLEY S D 1.00 732001 ALLEGHENY WEST MIFFLIN BORO WEST MIFFLIN AREA S D 1.00 710802 ALLEGHENY WEST VIEW BORO NORTH HILLS S D 1.00 732002 ALLEGHENY WHITAKER BORO WEST MIFFLIN AREA S D 1.00 720405 ALLEGHENY WHITE OAK BORO MCKEESPORT AREA S D 1.00 730104 ALLEGHENY WHITEHALL BORO BALDWIN-WHITEHALL S D 1.50 721012 ALLEGHENY WILKINS TWP WOODLAND HILLS S D 1.00 720901 ALLEGHENY WILKINSBURG BORO WILKINSBURG BOROUGH S D 1.00 720104 ALLEGHENY WILMERDING BORO EAST ALLEGHENY S D 1.00 030101 ARMSTRONG
Recommended publications
  • Saskatchewan Bound: Migration to a New Canadian Frontier

    Saskatchewan Bound: Migration to a New Canadian Frontier

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Quarterly Great Plains Studies, Center for 1992 Saskatchewan Bound: Migration to a New Canadian Frontier Randy William Widds University of Regina Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly Part of the Other International and Area Studies Commons Widds, Randy William, "Saskatchewan Bound: Migration to a New Canadian Frontier" (1992). Great Plains Quarterly. 649. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly/649 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Studies, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Quarterly by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. SASKATCHEWAN BOUND MIGRATION TO A NEW CANADIAN FRONTIER RANDY WILLIAM WIDDIS Almost forty years ago, Roland Berthoff used Europeans resident in the United States. Yet the published census to construct a map of En­ despite these numbers, there has been little de­ glish Canadian settlement in the United States tailed examination of this and other intracon­ for the year 1900 (Map 1).1 Migration among tinental movements, as scholars have been this group was generally short distance in na­ frustrated by their inability to operate beyond ture, yet a closer examination of Berthoff's map the narrowly defined geographical and temporal reveals that considerable numbers of migrants boundaries determined by sources
  • Environmental Policy, Municipalities and Intergovernmental Cooperation in Brazil Estela Maria Souza Costa Neves

    Environmental Policy, Municipalities and Intergovernmental Cooperation in Brazil Estela Maria Souza Costa Neves

    Environmental policy, municipalities and intergovernmental cooperation in Brazil ESTELA MARIA SOUZA COSTA NEVES FFECTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL policies are indispensable for the sus- tainability of long-term development for meeting both domestic chal- E lenges and the so-called global issues. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the understanding of environmental governance in Brazil through the exploratory analysis of the relationship between municipalities and envi- ronmental policy strategies developed by the Federal Government, from the perspective of the Brazilian federative state. The central argument presented herein holds that in Brazil, for an impor- tant number of topics on the environmental agenda, the success of the initiatives promoted by the federal government depends to some extent on the adhesion of municipalities. Since 1988, endowed with the status of federated entities and enjoying unprecedented autonomy, municipalities can contribute to the failure of federal initiatives by not subscribing to said initiatives, especially these require the exercise of their exclusive powers and the allocation of their own resources. Nationwide public policies promoted by central governments require the involvement of local government actors either to tailor policy objectives and regulations to local specificities, harmonize conflicting priorities, or optimize the use of increasingly scarcer public resources. The structure of intergovern- mental relations is a crucial factor for the success of public policies implemented at central level, especially the promotion of the mutual and enriching adaptation of national and local perspectives (Villanueva, 2000, p.40). The importance of the participation of local governments, however, is not restricted to the host of benefits pointed out in the literature about the ad- vantages of localized state action - such as increased efficiency, less corruption, promotion of direct democracy practices, greater social control, transparency and greater capacity to meet local specificities and preferences.
  • Holidays & Short Breaks

    Holidays & Short Breaks

    Tynedale Group Travel Holidays & Short Breaks 2021 www.tgtholidays.co.uk Tour Programme 2021 A TGT Gift Voucher is the perfect present DEPARTURE TOUR DAYS PAGE and can be used as full or part 5 May Isle of Man, History & Heritage 5 Days 6 payment for any of our holidays. 31 May Llandrindod Wells & Heart of Wales 5 Days 6 They are a great way to mark 6 June Dolphins, Drams, Castles & Cairngorms 5 Days 7 Birthdays, Mother’s Day, Father’s Day, Anniversaries, Christmas etc. 13 June Barnstaple & Devon Delights 6 Days 7 or just as a special thank you. 20 June Antrim Coast & The Giants Causeway 5 Days 8 Please call 01434 322944 to 27 June Stratford and The Picturesque Cotswolds 5 Days 8 place your order (min £20). 3 July Regal Scotland 'Castles & Drams' 5 Days 9 10 July Llandudno and Snowdonia 5 Days 9 28 July Sidmouth & Devon Coast 7 Days 10 8 August Cheshire Luxury Break 3 Days 10 11 August Cornish Delights 6 Days 11 23 August Norfolk Broads ‘Steam & Cruise’ 5 Days 11 28 August Downton Abbey & Hampshire Cream Tea 4 Days 12 12 September Ireland, Bantry Bay & Garnish Island 7 Days 12 23 September Cheddar Gorge, Bath & Wells 5 Days 13 30 September Gloucester - Waterways, Railways & Cream Teas 5 Days 13 26 October Pitlochry, The Enchanted Forest & Autumn Tints 5 Days 14 11 November All Inclusive Scottish Winter Wonderland 5 Days 14 17 November Festive Chatsworth & Christmas Markets 3 Days 15 21 November All Inclusive Turkey & Tinsel Inverness 5 Days 15 28 November Thursford Christmas Spectacular 3 Days 16 15 December Holly & Mistletoe Festive Break in Llandudno 5 Days 16 The above package tours are organised by TGT Holidays Ltd.
  • June 202113 18 23 1 DRONES? GREAT CHOICE, YOU’RE COVERED

    June 202113 18 23 1 DRONES? GREAT CHOICE, YOU’RE COVERED

    TheMunicipality Your Voice Your Wisconsin. June | 2021 NEW OFFICIALS Effective Onboarding The State Needs Wisconsin Certified Public Ethics and Conflicts Strive for Balance; for New Municipal Receiving Acts to Recommit Electrifying Manager Program Helps of Interest Part 1: Settle for Sanity Board Members of Humility to Cities Vehicles You Stand Out The State Ethics Code 4 6 9 The Municipality11 | June 202113 18 23 1 DRONES? GREAT CHOICE, YOU’RE COVERED. Five years from now, we will wonder how Cities and Villages operated without them. LWMMI anticipates the needs of our members. That’s why liability coverage for drones was added in 2014. If your municipality is not insured by the League Program you may be “grounded.” With LWMMI Insurance you can operate your City or Village the way you want to and Don’t Worry, You’re Covered! Protecting The Communities We Live In. 608.833.9595 | www.LWMMI.org A Mutual Company Owned by Member Cities and Villages. TheMunicipality The Municipality Official Monthly Publication of the League of Wisconsin Municipalities Volume 116, No 6, June 2021 June | 2021 Editorial Offices 131 W. Wilson St., Suite 505, Madison, WI 53703 Dial (608) 267-2380 Feature Fax: (608) 267-0645 e-mail: [email protected] Effective Strive for The State Website: www.lwm-info.org Welcome Onboarding for Receiving Balance; Needs to Electrifying to Local New Municipal Acts of The Municipality serves as the medium of Settle for Recommit to Vehicles Government! Board Humility exchange of ideas and information on municipal Sanity Cities affairs for the officials of Wisconsin cities Members and villages.
  • 7206 Thf London Gazette, 11 September, 19J 4

    7206 Thf London Gazette, 11 September, 19J 4

    7206 THF LONDON GAZETTE, 11 SEPTEMBER, 19J 4. SECOND SCHEDULE. ESSEX. Municipal Boroughs.—Chelmsford: Colches- PROHIBITED AREAS. ter : Harwich: Maldon: Southend-on-Sea. Urban Districts.—Brentwood: Brightlingeea:. The following areas are prohibited areas in Burnham-on-Crouch: Clacton: Frinton-on- England: — Sea: Grays Thurrock: Leigh-on-Sea: Shoe- CHESHIRE. bury ness : Tilbury: Walton-on-the-Naze. County Boroughs.—Birkenhead: Chester: Witham: Wivenhoe. Wallasey. Rural Districts.—Billericay: Braintree—(Civ: Urban Districts.—Bromborough : Ellesmere Parishes of—Feering, Great Coggeshall Port and Whitby: Higher Bebington: Kelvedon, Little C'oggeshall, MarkshalU Hoole: Hoylake and West Kirby: Lower Rivenhall, Fairsted, Faulkbourne, Hatfield. Bebington: Neston and Parkgate: Runcorn. Peverel, and Terling only) : Chelmsford: Rural Districts.—Chester (Civil Parishes of— Lexden: Maldon : Orsett: Rochf ord: Tend." Bache, Backford, Blacom-cum-Crabwall, ring. Bridge Trafford, Capenhurst, Caughall, GLOUCESTERSHIRE . Chorlton by Backford, Croughton, Dunham- County Borough.—Bristol. on-the-Hill, Elton, Great Saughall, Haps- Urban Districts.—C'oleford : Kingswood. ford, Hoole Village, Ince, Lea by Backford, Rural Districts.—Chipping Sodbury: Lyd- Little Saughall, Little Stanney, Mickle bury: Thornbury: Warmley: West Dean. Trafford, Mollington, Moston, Newton-by- Chester, Picto^i, Shotwick, Shotwick Park, HAMPSHIRE. Stoke, Thornton-le-Moors, Upton-by- County Boroughs.—Bournemouth: Ports- Chester, Wervin, Wimbolds Trafford, and mouth : Southampton. Woodbank only): Runcorn (Civil Parishes Municipal Boroughs.—Christchurch : Lyming- of—Acton Grange, Antrobus, Appleton, ton: Romsey. Bartington, Crowley, Daresbury, Dutton, Urban Districts.—Eastleigh and Bishopstoke . Grappenhall, Great Budworth, Hatton, Fareham: Gosport and Alverstoke. Higher Whitley, Keckwick, Latchford Havant: Itchen: Warblington. Without, Lower Whitley, Moore, Newton- Rural Districts.—Christchurch : Fareham by-Daresbury, Preston-on-the-Hill, Seven Havant: Ljonington: New Forest: Romsey.
  • Glossary of Terms Commonly Used in Municipal Finance

    Glossary of Terms Commonly Used in Municipal Finance

    Glossary of Terms Commonly Used in Municipal Finance Abatement: A complete or partial cancellation of a tax bill imposed by a governmental unit; applicable to tax levies and special assessments. Appropriation: An authorization granted by a legislative body to make expenditures and to incur obligations for specific purposes. An appropriation is usually limited in amount and the time when it can be expended. Any amount that is appropriated may be encumbered. A warrant article appropriation is carried forward from year to year until spent for the designated purpose or transferred by town meeting vote to another account. Assessed Valuation: The value placed upon a particular property by the local Board of Assessors for the purpose of apportioning the town’s tax levy among individual property owners equitably and in accordance with the legal requirement that property be assessed at “full and fair cash value”, certified periodically by the Commonwealth’s Commissioner of Revenue (no less frequently than once every three years). Available Funds: Balances in the various fund types that represent non-recurring revenue sources. As a matter of sound practice, they are frequently appropriated to meet unforeseen expenses, for capital expenditures or other onetime costs. Examples of available funds include free cash, stabilization funds and overlay surplus. Audit: Work done by accountants in examining financial reports, reviewing compliance with applicable laws and regulations, reviewing effectiveness in achieving program results. A basic audit examines only the financial reports and legal compliance. An outside Certified Public Accountant (CPA) audit is directed primarily toward the expression of an opinion as to the fairness of the financial statements and submission of a management letter.
  • Area Name Course Fixture Date D&C Bishops Court Club Ottery St Mary

    Area Name Course Fixture Date D&C Bishops Court Club Ottery St Mary

    Area Name Course Fixture Date D&C Bishops Court Club Ottery St Mary (Bishops Court) 19/11/2017 Subject to Conditions SAND Point-to-Point Owners & Riders Association Barbury Racecourse 26/11/2017 EA Cambridge University United Hunts Club Cottenham 03/12/2017 W Hursley Hambledon Larkhill 03/12/2017 D&C Cornwall Hunt Club Wadebridge 10/12/2017 N Ratcheugh Racing Club Alnwick 10/12/2017 WM Harkaway Club Chaddesley Corbett 29/12/2017 EA Cambridgeshire Harriers Hunt Club Cottenham 31/12/2017 W Larkhill Racing Club Larkhill 07/01/2018 N West Percy Alnwick 07/01/2018 D&C North Cornwall Wadebridge 07/01/2018 Y Yorkshire Area Point-to-Point Club Sheriff Hutton 14/01/2018 EA Dunston Harriers Ampton 14/01/2018 SM Barbury International Racing Club Barbury Racecourse 20/01/2018 N Jedforest Friars Haugh 21/01/2018 W Royal Artillery Larkhill 27/01/2018 SM Heythrop Cocklebarrow 28/01/2018 D&C Tiverton Foxhounds Chipley Park 28/01/2018 EA North Norfolk Harriers Higham 28/01/2018 MID Midlands Area Club Thorpe Lodge 28/01/2018 N Percy Alnwick 04/02/2018 W South Dorset Milborne St Andrew 04/02/2018 EA Cambridgeshire with Enfield Chace Horseheath 04/02/2018 D&C Western Wadebridge 04/02/2018 N Berwickshire Friars Haugh 10/02/2018 EA Cambridge University Draghounds Cottenham 10/02/2018 WM Albrighton & Woodland (North) Chaddesley Corbett 11/02/2018 SAND Vine & Craven Barbury Racecourse 11/02/2018 Y Sinnington Duncombe Park 11/02/2018 MID Brocklesby Brocklesby Park 17/02/2018 W Combined Services Larkhill 18/02/2018 D&C South Pool Harriers Buckfastleigh 18/02/2018 SE South East Hunt Club Charing 18/02/2018 SWM Curre & Llangibby Howick 18/02/2018 NW Sir W.W.
  • GOLD PLACER DEPOSITS of the EASTERN TOWNSHIPS, PART E PROVINCE of QUEBEC, CANADA Department of Mines and Fisheries Honourable ONESIME GAGNON, Minister L.-A

    GOLD PLACER DEPOSITS of the EASTERN TOWNSHIPS, PART E PROVINCE of QUEBEC, CANADA Department of Mines and Fisheries Honourable ONESIME GAGNON, Minister L.-A

    RASM 1935-E(A) GOLD PLACER DEPOSITS OF THE EASTERN TOWNSHIPS, PART E PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, CANADA Department of Mines and Fisheries Honourable ONESIME GAGNON, Minister L.-A. RICHARD. Deputy-Minister BUREAU OF MINES A.-0. DUFRESNE, Director ANNUAL REPORT of the QUEBEC BUREAU OF MINES for the year 1935 JOHN A. DRESSER, Directing Geologist PART E Gold Placer Deposits of the Eastern Townships by H. W. McGerrigle QUEBEC REDEMPTI PARADIS PRINTER TO HIS MAJESTY THE KING 1936 PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, CANADA Department of Mines and Fisheries Honourable ONESIME GAGNON. Minister L.-A. RICHARD. Deputy-Minister BUREAU OF MINES A.-O. DUFRESNE. Director ANNUAL REPORT of the QUEBEC BUREAU OF MINES for the year 1935 JOHN A. DRESSER, Directing Geologist PART E Gold Placer Deposits of the Eastern Townships by H. W. MeGerrigle QUEBEe RÉDEMPTI PARADIS • PRINTER TO HIS MAJESTY THE KING 1936 GOLD PLACER DEPOSITS OF THE EASTERN TOWNSHIPS by H. W. McGerrigle TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 5 Scope of report and method of work 5 Acknowledgments 6 Summary 6 Previous work . 7 Bibliography 9 DESCRIPTION OF PLACER LOCALITIES 11 Ascot township 11 Felton brook 12 Grass Island brook . 13 Auckland township. 18 Bury township .. 19 Ditton area . 20 General 20 Summary of topography and geology . 20 Table of formations 21 IIistory of development and production 21 Dudswell township . 23 Hatley township . 23 Horton township. 24 Ireland township. 25 Lamhton township . 26 Leeds township . 29 Magog township . 29 Orford township . 29 Shipton township 31 Moe and adjacent rivers 33 Moe river . 33 Victoria river 36 Stoke Mountain area .
  • 2017 Census of Governments, State Descriptions: School District Governments and Public School Systems

    2017 Census of Governments, State Descriptions: School District Governments and Public School Systems

    NCES 2019 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Education Demographic and Geographic Estimates (EDGE) Program 2017 Census of Governments, State Descriptions: School District Governments and Public School Systems Education Demographic and Geographic Estimates (EDGE) Program 2017 Census of Governments, State Descriptions: School District Governments and Public School Systems JUNE 2019 Doug Geverdt National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Department of Education ii U.S. Department of Education Betsy DeVos Secretary Institute of Education Sciences Mark Schneider Director National Center for Education Statistics James L. Woodworth Commissioner Administrative Data Division Ross Santy Associate Commissioner The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is the primary federal entity for collecting, analyzing, and reporting data related to education in the United States and other nations. It fulfills a congressional mandate to collect, collate, analyze, and report full and complete statistics on the condition of education in the United States; conduct and publish reports and specialized analyses of the meaning and significance of such statistics; assist state and local education agencies in improving their statistical systems; and review and report on education activities in foreign countries. NCES activities are designed to address high-priority education data needs; provide consistent, reliable, complete, and accurate indicators of education status and trends; and report timely, useful, and high-quality data to the U.S. Department of Education, Congress, states, other education policymakers, practitioners, data users, and the general public. Unless specifically noted, all information contained herein is in the public domain. We strive to make our products available in a variety of formats and in language that is appropriate to a variety of audiences.
  • Local Government Review in the Derwentside District Council Area, County Durham

    Local Government Review in the Derwentside District Council Area, County Durham

    Local Government Review in the Derwentside District Council Area, County Durham Research Study Conducted for The Boundary Committee for England April 2004 Contents Introduction 3 Summary of Key Findings 5 Methodology 7 Definitions of Social Grade and Area 11 Topline Findings (Marked-up Questionnaire) 13 Introduction This summary report presents the key findings of research conducted by the MORI Social Research Institute on behalf of The Boundary Committee for England in the Derwentside District Council area, County Durham. The aim of the research was to establish residents’ views about alternative patterns of unitary local government. Background to the Research In May 2003, the Government announced that a referendum would take place in autumn 2004 in the North East, North West and Yorkshire and the Humber regions on whether there should be elected regional assemblies. The Government indicated that, where a regional assembly is set up, the current two-tier structure of local government - district, borough or city councils (called in this report ‘districts’) and county councils - should be replaced by a single tier of ‘unitary’ local authorities. In June 2003, the Government directed The Boundary Committee for England (‘the Committee’) to undertake an independent review of local government in two-tier areas in the three regions, with a view to recommending possible unitary structures to be put before affected local people in a referendum at a later date. MORI was commissioned by COI Communications, on behalf of the Committee, to help it gauge local opinion. The research was in two stages. First, in summer 2003, MORI researched local residents’ views about local government and how they identify with their local community.
  • Chapter Title

    Chapter Title

    Centre County Demographics and Travel Patterns The purpose of this chapter is to describe Centre County in terms of demographics, major and minor trip generators, planning and zoning, and travel patterns. This information, when considered relative to the inventory of available transportation modes in Centre County, helps to identify specific areas that present the greatest need for transportation improvements. The large land area of Centre County (almost 1,100 square miles), and the County’s mountain ridges and valleys impact the physical layout of transportation infrastructure. Demographic indicators must also be considered within the context of these geographic attributes. Within this chapter, socioeconomic data at the census tract level from the 2010 US Census, 2009-13 American Community Survey (ACS), and the information from Chamber of Business and Industry of Centre County (CBICC) is presented relative to the following categories: • Population and Density • Vehicle Availability • Income and Poverty • Labor Force and Unemployment • Public Assistance and SSI Income • Educational Attainment • Distribution of Jobs • Distribution of Age 65 and Older Population and Social Security Income • Distribution of Disabled Population • Housing Figure 2, which is a map of census tracts within Centre County, is presented on the following page. Centre County Long Range Transportation Plan 2044 Page II- 1 Centre County Demographics & Travel Patterns Figure 2 A map of Centre County planning regions is presented on the following page as Figure 3. Planning
  • River Revenue an Economy Built on the Banks of the Susquehanna

    River Revenue an Economy Built on the Banks of the Susquehanna

    Central Penn Business Journal’s Dauphin/ Cumberland Business Report 2014 River Revenue An economy built on the banks of the Susquehanna Sponsored by: A MARKETING SUPPLEMENT TO Renovating or Relocating? Let us help improve your image. Adaptable architecture. Year after year. Enclose® movable walls provide the look, feel, and acoustical performances of conventional construction, yet are designed to anticipate your need to change. Great spaces begin at the ground level. TecCrete® access flooring for the office, computer room, or wherever it is needed. The exposed concrete surface offers a unique aesthetic appeal that can be left bare, coated, or carpeted. AUTHORIZED DEALER We have expanded to serve you better! Give us a call today to set up an appointment to see our NEW corporate headquarters and showroom, and let us show how we can inspire you! 7813 Derry Street, Harrisburg, PA 17111 717-985-9700 • www.gotanner.com 2 Dauphin/Cumberland Business Report 2014 FROM OUR SPONSOR 4 Dear Readers: MARKET FACTS The facts and numbers behind Dauphin and Cumberland Area Economic Development Cumberland counties Corp. (CAEDC) and Cumberland Valley Visitors Bureau (CVVB) are proud to serve the Cumberland Valley community, which includes Cumberland County and the sur- rounding area, through the attraction of new 7 business, the growth and retention of existing BUSINESSES THAT LISTEN business, and the promotion of our tourism and natural assets. We A focus on customer needs spurs business growth work each day to create jobs, generate investment and maintain a in the region high quality of life for our community. Our success is contingent upon the strength of our partnerships with businesses, nonprofits, local municipalities and residents.