DOCSLIB.ORG

Hazony Dissertation Submitted Pdf 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hazony Dissertation Submitted Pdf 1 HUMAN RESPONSIBILITY IN THE THOUGHT OF ELIEZER BERKOVITS Thesis submitted for the degree of “Doctor of Philosophy” by DAVID HAZONY Submitted to the Senate of the Hebrew University July, 2011 1 This work was carried out under the supervision of Prof. Warren Zev Harvey Prof. Aviezer Ravitzky 2 HUMAN RESPONSIBILITY IN THE THOUGHT OF ELIEZER BERKOVITS Contents INTRODUCTION 1 Berkovits’ Life 4 Berkovits’ Methodology and Aims 7 The Present Study 22 Influences on His Thought 30 PART 1: MORALITY AND LAW 40 Introduction: Jewish Law in a Modern World 40 I. Values in Halacha 44 II. Consequences vs. Intentions 63 III. Body vs. Spirit 80 Conclusions 94 PART 2: HUMAN RESPONSIBILITY AND JEWISH NATIONHOOD 98 Introduction: Zionism in Jewish Religious Thinking 98 I. Collective Identity in Judaism 104 II. National Sovereignty 115 III. The Implications of Exile 133 Conclusions 143 PART 3: THEODICY AND RESPONSIBILITY 146 Introduction: Evil in the Shadow of the Holocaust 146 I. The Holocaust in Theological-Historical Perspective 161 II. History as Man’s Responsibility 166 III. The Silence of God 187 Conclusions 217 CONCLUSION 223 BIBLIOGRAPHY 230 3 אחריות אנושית בהגותו של אליעזר ברקוביץ חיבור לשם קבלת תואר דוק טור מאת דוד חזוני הוגש לסנט האוניברסיטה העברית , בירושלים יולי 2011 4 HUMAN RESPONSIBILITY IN THE THOUGHT OF ELIEZER BERKOVITS David Hazony INTRODUCTION With the hindsight of nearly two decades, we can today look back to the early 1990s as the end of an era in modern Jewish thought. With the passage of thinkers like Joseph Solovietchik, Emanuel Levinas, and Yeshayahu Leibowitz, followed by Emil Fackenheim in 2003, the great wave of European- born Jewish philosophers whose work began a century ago and reached its peak in the middle of the twentieth century, has come to a close. Inspired in large part by the dramatic flowering of general European philosophy in the late nineteenth and first half of the twentieth centuries, and by unparalleled developments in fields of research bearing clear philosophical implications such as quantum physics, sociology, linguistics, and psychology, Jewish philosophy experienced a renaissance unlike anything since the medieval period. Every new area of exploration, it seemed, was joined by Jewish-born thinkers who took leading roles not only in pure philosophy itself—think of names like Edmund Husserl, Henri Bergson, Sigmund Freud, Ludwig 1 Wittgenstein, Emmanuel Levinas, Jacques Derrida, Karl Popper, Hannah Arendt, Claude Levi-Strauss, or Walter Benjamin—but also in a philosophically inspired exploration of the sources of Judaism, which is more properly called “Jewish philosophy.” Writers like Hermann Cohen, Franz Rosenzweig, Martin Buber, Abraham Joshua Heschel, Mordecai Kaplan, and later, Leibowitz, Fackenheim, and Soloveitchik didn’t just add a philosophical element to their Jewish writings; they offered, each in his own way, engagements with modernity that literally reshaped Judaism itself, inspiring new religious movements, sharpening and deepening existing ones, and giving bold and creative new voice to the Jewish religious spirit. One of the most fascinating, if least studied, of these figures was Eliezer Berkovits (1908-1992). Over the course of his life, Berkovits wrote no fewer than nineteen books and hundreds of essays, grappling with the entire gamut of Jewish philosophical questions, as well as a wide array of topics affecting Jewish life of his time: Assimilation, the rabbinate, the Holocaust, Zionism, the status of women in Judaism; the emergence of the Eastern- influenced, drug-experimenting counterculture of the 1960s; anti-Semitism in Christian European thought and in modern historiography; and the failure of Israeli utopian movements such as the kibbutzim. He also did battle directly with major Jewish philosophers whom he considered to have distorted Jewish tradition’s central truths, including major critical essays on Cohen, Buber, Rosenzweig, Heschel, and Kaplan. 2 Yet the core of his writings comprised a series of works that were neither critiques nor social commentary, so much as constructive efforts to articulate the essence of Judaism. His longest work, Man and God: Studies in Biblical Theology (1969), takes key biblical terms such as “the name of God,” “justice,” and “holiness,” and tries to construct a philosophical definition and resonance to each of them. His Faith after the Holocaust , while addressing both the historical causes of anti-Semitism and the arguments for the death of God coming from the radical theologians, is at its heart an effort to resolve the profound questions of theodicy that date back at least to the time of the Talmud. In Not in Heaven: The Nature and Function of Halacha (1983), he attempts to construct a philosophy of Jewish law that describes it not just as a set of rituals but an expression of deeper social values and mutual concern. One of his first published works, Towards Historic Judaism , attempts to critique the “breach between Torah and Life” that in his view began already in medieval times, and calls for a new approach to Judaism as deeply engaged with culture, politics, and questions of society. And at the core of this constructive effort lies a relatively brief, singular work, with the unassuming title of God, Man, and History , in which Berkovits attempts to present a comprehensive Jewish philosophy that begins from first principles and goes on to cover his essential thoughts about Judaism’s approach to theology, morality, and nationhood. 3 While each of these was written in some sense as a response to developments that became especially acute in his lifetime, all of them reflect a fervent desire on Berkovits’ part to construct a whole philosophy of Judaism, a coherent and developed affirmation of something very important that, in his view, had been lost not only among Jewish philosophers, but also among the Orthodox rabbinate in which he grew up, and throughout the Jewish world. The central aim of this dissertation will be to examine this constructive effort, to explore and critique it, and offer a preliminary evaluation as to whether Berkovits does not, as a result, deserve a far more central place in the pantheon of modern Jewish philosophy. Berkovits’ Life Eliezer Berkovits was born in the bustling Jewish community of Oradea, Transylvania (now Romania) in 1908. The Jewish community, described by one source as “the most active both commercially and culturally in the Austro-Hungarian Empire,” 1 hosted major synagogues of both Orthodox and Neolog (Reform) varieties, and doubtless gave Berkovits early exposure to a variety of Jewish religious expressions. He received his Orthodox rabbinical training at the yeshiva of Pressburg and, beginning in the 1 “Uncovering and Documenting Jewish Art and Architecture in Western Romania.” Center for Jewish Art. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Summer 1998. Retrieved 2007-03-05. Cited in Wikipedia, “Oradea,” accessed March 28, 2010. 4 1930s, at the “Hildesheimer” Rabbinical Seminary of Berlin, where he also functioned as a congregational rabbi. During his Berlin period, he also studied philosophy at the University of Berlin, earning a Ph.D. After escaping Germany in 1939, Berkovits served as a communal rabbi in Leeds (where his riveting wartime sermons were captured in the book Between Yesterday and Tomorrow ), Sydney, and Boston before assuming the chair of the philosophy department at the Hebrew Theological College in Chicago in 1958, where he taught until 1975. In Chicago he also helped found, and served as the unofficial rabbi of, the Or Torah synagogue in Skokie, Illinois. In 1975, at the age of 67, Berkovits relocated to Jerusalem, where he lived and worked until his death in 1992. One of the features of Berkovits’ life that sets him apart from most modern Jewish philosophers was the impact of his extensive rabbinic training in forming, and formulating, his philosophy. Given the creative impulse and religious passion that drove much of twentieth-century Jewish philosophy, it is surprising to note how few prominent Jewish thinkers actually were educated in a traditional rabbinic setting. While the areas of Jewish literature and poetry benefited greatly from the exposure of some of its key figures to the world of the Eastern-European-style yeshiva (think of S.Y. Agnon, Chaim Nahman Bialik, Chaim Grade, Isaac Bashevis Singer, and Chaim Potok), Jewish philosophy was written mostly without such direct exposure. Cohen, Rosenzweig, Buber, Fackenheim, Borowitz, and others—none of them were 5 raised within the tradition of classic rabbinic study. Indeed, with a few exceptions, it is fair to say that Jewish philosophy emerged in the twentieth century to a surprising degree in the absence of intimate acquaintance with classic rabbinic thought. For his part, Berkovits (like Soloveitchik) spent his entire career not only surrounding himself with rabbinic texts and holding positions in rabbinic academies and Orthodox pulpits, but gaining from the influence of, and continued exposure to, classic rabbinic tradition. This lends his writings a certain intimate Jewish authoritativeness, comprehensiveness, and above all accessibility to a wide variety of rabbinic sources of all ages, that is often missing in the efforts of other modern Jewish philosophers to give a modern rendering to the deepest themes of classic Jewish tradition. At the same time, a word about the language of his writings may also shed some light on his aims. Though he was raised in a world that spoke Hungarian, Romanian, and later Yiddish, his published works were written in the vernacular language of his primary audiences in the countries in which he lived: His first published work, What is the Talmud? written during his Berlin period, was written in German, as was his doctoral dissertation; his philosophical and social-criticism books were written in English, including Towards Historic Judaism which appeared just four years after his emigration to England; his three yeshiva-targeted works of halachic scholarship were written in a rabbinic-laden Hebrew, and his one book about Israeli society (Crisis of Judaism in the Jewish State ; 1987), was written in modern Hebrew after 6 his immigration to Israel.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CCAR Journal the Reform Jewish Quarterly
    CCAR Journal The Reform Jewish Quarterly Halachah and Reform Judaism Contents FROM THE EDITOR At the Gates — ohrgJc: The Redemption of Halachah . 1 A. Brian Stoller, Guest Editor ARTICLES HALACHIC THEORY What Do We Mean When We Say, “We Are Not Halachic”? . 9 Leon A. Morris Halachah in Reform Theology from Leo Baeck to Eugene B . Borowitz: Authority, Autonomy, and Covenantal Commandments . 17 Rachel Sabath Beit-Halachmi The CCAR Responsa Committee: A History . 40 Joan S. Friedman Reform Halachah and the Claim of Authority: From Theory to Practice and Back Again . 54 Mark Washofsky Is a Reform Shulchan Aruch Possible? . 74 Alona Lisitsa An Evolving Israeli Reform Judaism: The Roles of Halachah and Civil Religion as Seen in the Writings of the Israel Movement for Progressive Judaism . 92 David Ellenson and Michael Rosen Aggadic Judaism . 113 Edwin Goldberg Spring 2020 i CONTENTS Talmudic Aggadah: Illustrations, Warnings, and Counterarguments to Halachah . 120 Amy Scheinerman Halachah for Hedgehogs: Legal Interpretivism and Reform Philosophy of Halachah . 140 Benjamin C. M. Gurin The Halachic Canon as Literature: Reading for Jewish Ideas and Values . 155 Alyssa M. Gray APPLIED HALACHAH Communal Halachic Decision-Making . 174 Erica Asch Growing More Than Vegetables: A Case Study in the Use of CCAR Responsa in Planting the Tri-Faith Community Garden . 186 Deana Sussman Berezin Yoga as a Jewish Worship Practice: Chukat Hagoyim or Spiritual Innovation? . 200 Liz P. G. Hirsch and Yael Rapport Nursing in Shul: A Halachically Informed Perspective . 208 Michal Loving Can We Say Mourner’s Kaddish in Cases of Miscarriage, Stillbirth, and Nefel? . 215 Jeremy R.
    [Show full text]
  • Bernard Revel Graduate School of Jewish Studies
    Bernard Revel Graduate School of Jewish Studies Table of Contents Ancient Jewish History .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Medieval Jewish History ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Modern Jewish History ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Bible .................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Jewish Philosophy ............................................................................................................................................... 23 Talmud ................................................................................................................................................................ 29 Course Catalog | Bernard Revel Graduate School of Jewish Studies 1 Ancient Jewish History JHI 5213 Second Temple Jewish Literature Dr. Joseph Angel Critical issues in the study of Second Temple literature, including biblical interpretations and commentaries, laws and rules of conduct, historiography, prayers, and apocalyptic visions. JHI 6233 Dead Sea Scrolls Dr. Lawrence Schiffman Reading of selected Hebrew and Aramaic texts from the Qumran library. The course will provide students with a deep
    [Show full text]
  • The Genius and Limitations of Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik Z"L
    The Genius and Limitations of Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik z"l Byline: Rabbi Dr. Nathan Lopes Cardozo is Dean of the David Cardozo Academy in Jerusalem. Thoughts to Ponder 529 The Genius and Limitations of Rabbi Joseph Ber Soloveitchik z”l * Nathan Lopes Cardozo Based on an introduction to a discussion between Professor William Kolbrener and Professor Elliott Malamet (1) Honoring the publication of Professor William Kolbrener’s new book “The Last Rabbi” (2) Yad Harav Nissim, Jerusalem, on Feb. 1, 2017 Dear Friends, I never had the privilege of meeting Rav Soloveitchik z”l or learning under him. But I believe I have read all of his books on Jewish philosophy and Halacha, and even some of his Talmudic novellae and halachic decisions. I have also spoken with many of his students. Here are my impressions. No doubt Rav Soloveitchik was a Gadol Ha-dor (a great sage of his generation). He was a supreme Talmudist and certainly one of the greatest religious thinkers of our time. His literary output is incredible. Still, I believe that he was not a mechadesh – a man whose novel ideas really moved the Jewish tradition forward, especially regarding Halacha. He did not solve major halachic problems. This may sound strange, because almost no one has written as many novel ideas about Halacha as Rav Soloveitchik (3). His masterpiece, Halakhic Man, is perhaps the prime example. Before Rav Soloveitchik appeared on the scene, nobody – surely not in mainstream Orthodoxy – had seriously dealt with the ideology and philosophy of Halacha (4). Page 1 In fact, the reverse is true.
    [Show full text]
  • ASSOCIATION for JEWISH STUDIES 37TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE Hilton Washington, Washington, DC December 18–20, 2005
    ASSOCIATION FOR JEWISH STUDIES 37TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE Hilton Washington, Washington, DC December 18–20, 2005 Saturday, December 17, 2005, 8:00 PM Farragut WORKS IN PROGRESS GROUP IN MODERN JEWISH STUDIES Co-chairs: Leah Hochman (University of Florida) Adam B. Shear (University of Pittsburgh) Sunday, December 18, 2005 GENERAL BREAKFAST 8:00 AM – 9:30 AM International Ballroom East (Note: By pre-paid reservation only.) REGISTRATION 8:30 AM – 6:00 PM Concourse Foyer AJS ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING 8:30 AM – 9:30 AM Lincoln East AJS BOARD OF 10:30 AM Cabinet DIRECTORS MEETING BOOK EXHIBIT (List of Exhibitors p. 63) 1:00 PM – 6:30 PM Exhibit Hall Session 1, Sunday, December 18, 2005 9:30 AM – 11:00 AM 1.1 Th oroughbred INSECURITIES AND UNCERTAINTIES IN CONTEMPORARY JEWISH LIFE Chair and Respondent: Leonard Saxe (Brandeis University) Eisav sonei et Ya’akov?: Setting a Historical Context for Catholic- Jewish Relations Forty Years after Nostra Aetate Jerome A. Chanes (Brandeis University) Judeophobia and the New European Extremism: La trahison des clercs 2000–2005 Barry A. Kosmin (Trinity College) Living on the Edge: Understanding Israeli-Jewish Existential Uncertainty Uriel Abulof (Th e Hebrew University of Jerusalem) 1.2 Monroe East JEWISH MUSIC AND DANCE IN THE MODERN ERA: INTERSECTIONS AND DIVERGENCES Chair and Respondent: Hasia R. Diner (New York University) Searching for Sephardic Dance and a Fitting Accompaniment: A Historical and Personal Account Judith Brin Ingber (University of Minnesota) Dancing Jewish Identity in Post–World War II America:
    [Show full text]
  • Two Models of Jewish Philosophy Submitted for the Degree of Phd in Philosophy at the London School
    Justifying One’s Practices: Two Models of Jewish Philosophy Submitted for the degree of PhD in Philosophy At the London School of Economics and Political Science Daniel Rynhold 2000 1 UMI Number: U120701 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U120701 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 773 ) Thesis Abstract Judaism is a religion that emphasises the importance of a set of practical commandments and in the history of Jewish philosophy various attempts have been made to rationalise or justify these commandments. In this thesis I try to establish a general model for the justification of practices through a critical examination of two such attempted rationalisations. However, the study is framed within the more general question of whether or not there can be such a thing as Jewish Philosophy as a genuinely substantive discipline. Thus, I take the particular topic of rationalising the commandments as a ‘case study’ in order to see whether we can do substantive Jewish philosophy at least in the practical sphere. In the main body of the thesis I look at the methods of rationalisation of Moses Maimonides and Joseph Soloveitchik and argue that despite being based on very different scientific models they share a central methodological presumption that I term the Priority of Theory (PoT).
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Thought Journal of the Goldstein-Goren International Center for Jewish Thought
    Jewish Thought Journal of the Goldstein-Goren International Center for Jewish Thought Editors Michal Bar-Asher Siegal Jonatan Meir Shalom Sadik Haim Kreisel (editor-in-chief) Editorial Secretary Asher Binyamin Volume 1 Faith and Heresy Beer-Sheva, 2019 Jewish Thought is published once a year by the Goldstein-Goren International Center for Jewish Thought. Each issue is devoted to a different topic. Topics of the following issues are as follows: 2020: Esotericism in Jewish Thought 2021: New Trends in the Research of Jewish Thought 2022: Asceticism in Judaism and the Abrahamic Religions Articles for the next issue should be submitted by September 30, 2019. Manuscripts for consideration should be sent, in Hebrew or English, as MS Word files, to: [email protected] The articles should be accompanied by an English abstract. The views and opinions expressed in the articles are those of the authors alone. The journal is open access: http://in.bgu.ac.il/en/humsos/goldstein-goren/Pages/Journal.aspx The Hebrew articles were edited by Dr. David Zori and Shifra Zori. The articles in English were edited by Dr. Julie Chajes. Address: The Goldstein-Goren International Center for Jewish Thought, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, PO Box 653, Beer-Sheva 8410501. © All Rights Reserved This issue is dedicated to Prof. Daniel J. Lasker for his 70Th birthday Table of Contents English Section Foreward 7 Michal Bar-Asher The Minim of the Babylonian Talmud 9 Siegal Menahem Kellner The Convert as the Most Jewish of Jews? 33 On the Centrality of Belief (the Opposite of Heresy) in Maimonidean Judaism Howard Kreisel Back to Maimonides’ Sources: 53 The Thirteen Principles Revisited George Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. David Johnson Prof. Meir Soloveichik Syllabus: PHI 4931H Seminar: Metaphysics of Judaism Spring 2021
    1 Prof. David Johnson Prof. Meir Soloveichik Syllabus: PHI 4931H Seminar: Metaphysics of Judaism Spring 2021 Goals of Seminar: Using medieval and modern philosophical sources, we will rigorously and extensively examine traditional Judaism’s philosophical and theological views on the nature and attributes of God. For centuries, Jewish philosophers, theologians and mystics have pondered biblical passages that speak of complex subjects such as: God’s love for Abraham and his children Israel; God dwelling within the tabernacle, and the Temple in Jerusalem; God’s foreknowledge of all human events, but also His anger at Israel’s sin, His regret following sin and His forgiveness following this anger. Maimonides, famously, read these verses through the lens of his own philosophical approach, seeking as much as possible to reduce any true analogy between God’s attributes (such as knowledge and love) and similarly named attributes of human beings. Describing biblical language about God as referring to either “negative attributes” or “attributes of action,” he insisted that any other approach would embody an assault on the doctrines of God’s perfection and noncorporeality. Maimonides’s philosophy does not embody the totality of Jewish thought. From Judah Halevi before Maimonides, to Nahmanides after, this approach was criticized as irreconcilable with biblical language and with Talmudic theology. Meanwhile, in the Christian world, Thomas Aquinas seriously engaged Maimonides’s writings and responded to them in a way that can be deeply instructive to Jewish students of philosophy. Centuries later, Michael Wyschogrod, influenced by the writings of Protestant theologian Karl Barth, offered his own critique of Maimonides.
    [Show full text]
  • New Encounters with Shestov
    The Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy, 2002, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 49–62 New Encounters with Shestov Michael Weingrad University of Leeds Lev Shestov (1866–1938) has not attained a secure place on the contemporary philo- sophical map. Feted in his lifetime, his name is now more commonly spotted in the works of better-known writers who came into the orbit of the man or his works. In part, this lack of renown is due to the difficulty of fitting him to a specific audience among the factions of postwar philosophy. Shestov is often identified as a ‘‘religious existentialist,’’ but what this designation means in his case is the fusion of a radical skepticism with a profound religious sense and, clearly, one trait will often make Shestov less appealing to those who share the other. With the waning of existentia- lism’s cache, moreover, Shestov lost a certain currency, though he had little in common with a Jean-Paul Sartre in any case. Intriguing attempts have been made to link him with other ‘‘Jewish existentialists,’’ particularly Martin Buber and Franz Rosenzweig, yet Shestov’s understanding of Judaism is too distant from that of the German Jews for this to be a solid affinity, and ‘‘Jewish existentialism’’ is not an entirely satisfactory rubric for any of these three thinkers. Yet it is worthwhile to take another look at Shestov, and for precisely the reason which has set his so-called existentialism on the back-burner: the shifts in continental philosophy which began in the 1960s, and which replaced existentialism with post- structuralism as the philosophy du jour, and which made Jacques Derrida and Michel Foucault, rather than Sartre, the thinkers of the day.
    [Show full text]
  • Ezra Tzfadya 2019 “Systematic Existence Philosophy and the Problem of Autonomy: Franz Rosenzweig and the Contemporary Irani
    “Systematic Existence Philosophy and the Problem of Autonomy: Franz Rosenzweig and the Contemporary Iranian Interpreters of Mullah Sadra in Dialogue” Synopsis: This text outlines the challenges and precedents for thinking through the problem of human autonomy for those that accept an ontological “existence philosophy” as their operative philosophical paradigm. It offers new directions for how contemporary Iranian-Shia philosophers in the shadow of Mulla Sadra and Khomeini, and Jewish thinkers grappling with the German philosophic tradition of Idealism and Existentialism, can come into dialogue in the unique context of modern theocracy. I. Introduction Modern Judaism and Iranian-Twelver Shiite Islam both contain philosophic streams that can be termed “systematic existence philosophy.” The Jewish tradition is associated, on the one hand, with the German thinker Franz Rosenzweig (1886-1929) who melded tropes and concepts from the biblical, rabbinic, and medieval- philosophic/mystical traditions with post-enlightenment Continental European Romanticism, Neo Kantianism, and Existentialism in the attempt to push back against the Hegelian turn in continental philosophy. On the other end of the ideological spectrum of “Jewish Existentialism” lies the mystically attuned religious thought of Rav Avraham Yitzchak Hacohen Kook (1865-1935), a rabbinic thinker originally from Odessa, Ukraine considered the ideological father of Religious Zionism who ultimately became chief rabbi of Palestine during the British Mandate. With an eclectic systematicity, Kook fused the ã Ezra Tzfadya 2019 cosmology of Jewish mysticism with an enthusiastically embraced Hegelian Romantic Idealism. 12 The Shiite tradition, one may say, is exemplified by the Safavid era thinker Mullah Sadra and the school he initiated in the 17th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Jewish Religious Movements
    Modern Jewish Religious Movements Religion 251 Professor: Jason Radine Classroom: Hall of Science 200 Office: 202 Comenius Hall, x1314 Class times: F 1:00–3:20 pm Office Hours: TTh 11am –12pm E-mail: [email protected] and by appointment Course Content Modern Judaism exists in a wide spectrum of beliefs and practices, from ultra-traditional to secular humanist. This course will explore both the making of modern Judaism and the religious “map” of Jewish life today. Topics will include Hasidic Judaism, Zionism, and contemporary North American trends in Judaism. Goals of the Course This course will provide an in-depth study of Jewish life as it is lived today. As will be seen, the diversity of Jewish religious practice and belief is not simply a matter of degrees of commitment, but of divergent ideological and theological positions. This course will explore the Jewish responses to modernity, and the varied attempts to resist or embrace cultural assimilation. The phenomenon of “Jewishness” vs. Judaism will be examined, and the issue of how secularism and Jewish identity can coexist. Assignments and Grading Grading will be based on four essay examinations, each counting for 15%. There will be two research papers as well, each counting for 15% (see the Student Handbook for the academic honesty policy). Participation counts for 10% of the total course grade. Attendance roll will be taken in each class day, and unexcused absences will affect the participation grade. Assigned readings should be done before the class for which they are assigned. This is not a passive-learning course; we will be actively studying and discussing the texts and other material in class.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Catalog | Bernard Revel Graduate School of Jewish Studies 1
    Bernard Revel Graduate School of Jewish Studies Table of Contents Ancient Jewish History .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Medieval Jewish History ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Modern Jewish History ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Bible .................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Jewish Philosophy ............................................................................................................................................... 20 Talmud ................................................................................................................................................................ 24 Course Catalog | Bernard Revel Graduate School of Jewish Studies 1 Ancient Jewish History JHI 6221 (Hebraism & Hellenism: Greco-Roman Culture & the Rabbis) also counts toward the Talmudic Studies concentration. JHI 6241 (Second Temple Period Aramaic) also counts toward the Bible concentration. JHI 6243 (Samaritans and Jews: From the Bible to Modern Israel) and 6255 (Jewish Art and Visual Culture) also count toward the Medieval and Modern History concentrations. JHI 6461 (Historians on Chazal:
    [Show full text]
  • Between the Ritual and the Ethical: Mastery Over the Body in Modern Theories of Ta‘Amei Ha-Mitsvot
    Between the Ritual and the Ethical: Mastery Over the Body in Modern Theories of Ta‘amei ha-Mitsvot David Shatz* As Socrates awaits his death,1 his friends urge him to commit suicide. Socrates refuses, because God owns his body; but he then expresses his own general, positive attitude to his impending death. His body is a prison, he declares, incarcerating his soul. The body’s desires and appetites pester him, diverting him from intellectual pursuits; and the body, being a body, cannot attain the highest and only true form of knowledge, knowledge of the abstract world of Forms. Death is therefore liberating and welcome. And not only does the body carry negative value, it is not a person’s true self. Rather, the soul is. If people at the funeral state, “Socrates is being buried,” they are mistaken. It’s not Socrates; it’s a body that Socrates once wore or inhabited.2 Plato’s dualistic view of the human being—that human beings are composites of body and soul—was maintained by most people in the Middle Ages, philosophers and non-philosophers alike. More importantly, the Platonic devaluation of the body (and of matter generally) impacted dramatically on certain medieval Jewish philosophers via Neoplatonism, and these philosophers,3 in contrast to the talmudic sages, were in significant measure champions of asceticism.4 “Duties of the limbs” were means of * Yeshiva University, Department of Philosophy. 1 The reference, of course, is to Plato’s Phaedo. 2 Phaedo 115d–116a. 3 Maimonides’s view is best described as Neoplatonized Aristotelianism.
    [Show full text]