AGENDA FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 Tuesday, May 29, 2012
I. TIME AND PLACE 1. 7 p.m. at the James P. Fugate Administration Building II. ROLL CALL 1. Roll call of board members III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IV. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION 1. Written communications 2. Scheduled communications 3. Unscheduled communications 4. Community groups and organizations V. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE VI. STUDENT AND STAFF RECOGNITION 1. Student recognition 2. Staff recognition VII. STUDENT PARTICIPATION 1. Arthur Jacobsen Elementary School PTA report 2. Activity/athletic report—Olympic Middle School 3. Requests for travel VIII. SCHOOL PROGRAMS AND STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT 1. Outdoor recreation course modification curriculum 2. Glencoe math adoption 3. Microsoft IT academy presentation 4. Prevention intervention 5. 2011-12 Cascade Middle School Improvement Plan 6. Approval of interdistrict agreements providing services to disabled students 7. Approval of agreements providing services to disabled students IX. PERSONNEL 1. Certificated and classified personnel report
X. FINANCE 1. Vouchers 2. Request for authorization to surplus buses 3. Financial statements XI. DIRECTORS 1. Approval of minutes 2. Project Lighthouse workshop 3. Resolution No. 1155 4. Resolution No. 1156 5. Discussion 6. Executive session STUDENT AND STAFF RECOGNITION
1. Recognition of Student
The Auburn School District Board of Directors will recognize Christian Rotter, an eighth grade student at Rainier Middle School, for being an outstanding student.
Christian balances dogged determination with good sense in a manner far beyond his years. In May, Ms. Allison’s first period WEB leaders and Ms. Astle’s first period honors language arts class competed to bring in the most money for the Pennies for Patients drive. As donation dollars increased, the competition turned fierce. This included covert ops and counting coup. Even when the WEB (Where Everybody Belongs) class won the Pennies for Patients drive by bringing in the greatest dollar amount, Christian’s team did not gloat or boast. Instead, under Christian’s persistent leadership, which is grounded in always doing the right thing, the WEB class soothed hurt feelings by creating a video project for the honors language arts class. According to Ms. Astle, “Christian is a positive student leader. He is destined to do things greater than we can envision.”
As a WEB leader, Christian not only helps raise funds for charitable causes, but also mentors sixth grade students throughout the school year. He assists with the planning and delivery of lessons specially designed for new sixth graders. He is caring and competent and shadows several students to help them make it to and from class on time.
Christian’s competitiveness affects his academic and athletic goals. In Futsal—five-a-side indoor soccer—he is fast and quick and has amazing ball-handling skills. Recently, Christian broke the district track record in the mile with a time of 4:47. He always shakes the hands of his competitors before or after races and is a leader on the track team. His stamina, speed, and sportsmanship also pay off in class. In geometry he helps other students stay on track and guides them through difficult lessons.
2. Recognition of Staff
The Auburn School District Board of Directors will recognize Gina Greco, fourth grade teacher at Lake View Elementary School, for her outstanding service.
Gina Greco’s fourth grade classroom at Lake View Elementary School is a learning oasis. Students can bring pillows for their chairs and other comforts from home. “I treat my classroom like an extension of my family,” says Gina. “I want all my students to feel comfortable in class so they are ready to learn.”
Eleven years ago, Gina began helping Lake View students succeed in the classroom and beyond. Gina and her fellow fourth grade teachers constantly review data, ask questions, and make instructional decisions in order to increase student achievement. This year, Gina participated in the Auburn Teacher Leadership Academy (ATLA). Currently, she serves May 29, 2012 Page 2 as the Lake View science chair and is a principal intern at the school. Over the years, Gina has participated on the district’s childhood fitness and nutrition ad-hoc subcommittee, facilitated an after-school cooking club, and served as the PTA teacher representative.
Every day Gina models hard work and determination to her students. In 1999, Gina was diagnosed with Crohn’s disease, a life-changing and, at times, painful autoimmune disorder. According to Gina, “Crohn’s taught me perspective…how to overcome challenges and how to see the positive in every situation.” Gina’s can-do attitude permeates her teaching. No matter the task, Gina always finds a way to get the job done. In 2006 and 2011 Gina was recognized by students and parents as the Lake View PTA Outstanding Educator of the Year.
Gina volunteers with the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation and recently spoke at their annual conference. Additionally, Gina fundraises to help send children to Camp Oasis, a summer camp for children with Crohn’s disease.
On May 15, Gina earned a master’s in educational administration from Grand Canyon University. She holds a bachelor’s degree in early childhood education.
Gina, her husband and three-year-old son live in Lake Tapps. Outside of teaching, Gina enjoys baking and cooking and family dinners with her mom and siblings. Her Nana’s famous Easter bread and other Italian dishes are inspired by her Italian roots. In fact, both Gina and her husband’s families are from the same small village in Italy.
May 29, 2012 Page 3
STUDENT PARTICIPATION
1. Arthur Jacobsen Elementary School PTA Report
Eric Daniel, Arthur Jacobsen Elementary School principal, will introduce Patrice Schrama and Jen Harris, Arthur Jacobsen Elementary School’s PTA co-president and treasurer, respectively, who will give the Arthur Jacobsen Elementary School PTA report and answer questions from the board.
2. Activity/Athletic Report—Olympic Middle School Band and Choir Program
Don Sims, Olympic Middle School teacher and administrative intern, will introduce Janine Dodd, Olympic Middle School teacher, who will introduce Mikayla Brummond, Brandy Clark, Taylor Sloan, Morgan Tresch, Savannah Forgey, Megan Scott, Alexandria Tate, Jessica Simmons, Breanna Pina, Faith Palmer, Grace Herrity, Kristina Vigil, Felicity Hornbuckle, and Aryiana Morey, students. The students will sing a song, report on the Olympic Middle School band and choir program, and answer questions from the board.
3. Requests for Travel
a. Five Auburn High School students request permission to travel to Tacoma, Wednesday to Friday, June 27-29. The purpose of the trip is to attend the Herff Jones Yearbook workshop. Lodging and meals will be at the University of Puget Sound and parents will provide transportation for their own students. All expenses will be paid by ASB Yearbook funds. Thomas Kaup, Auburn High School teacher, requests permission to accompany the students. A substitute will not be needed.
b. Three Auburn Mountainview High School students requested permission to travel to Kennewick, Thursday to Saturday, May 24-26. The purpose of the trip is to compete in the Washington State Tennis Tournament. Lodging will be at the Best Western hotel, meals will be at local restaurants, and travel will be by private vehicle. Student expenses will be paid by ASB funds, coach expenses will be paid by athletics funds. Kay Lorrain, Auburn Mountainview High School tennis coach, requests permission to accompany the students. A substitute will be needed for two days. Prior administrative approval.
Recommendation: That the above trips be approved as requested. May 29, 2012 Page 4 SCHOOL PROGRAMS AND STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
1. Outdoor Recreation Course Modification Curriculum—Second Reading
Rodney Luke, assistant superintendent of K-12 student learning and technology, will introduce Cynthia Blansfield, director of secondary student learning, who will present the outdoor recreation modification curriculum for second reading and adoption.
Recommendation: That the proposed outdoor recreation course curriculum be approved for second reading and adoption.
2. Glencoe Math Adoption High School Implementation Update
Rodney Luke will introduce Cynthia Blansfield who will introduce Monte Eckelman, Auburn Mountainview High School assistant principal; Leah O’Brien, Auburn Mountainview High School math teacher; and Mike Clancy, Auburn Mountainview High School math teacher. The team will present an update on the implementation of the board-adopted Glencoe mathematics program at the high school level and answer questions from the board.
3. Microsoft IT Academy Presentation
Rodney Luke will introduce Steve DuBay, Auburn Mountainview High School assistant principal, who will introduce Patty Eckelman, business education teacher, Auburn Mountainview High School. Ms. Eckelman will share with the board the Microsoft IT Academy established at Auburn Mountainview High School and highlight the achievements of her students participating in this unique career and technical education program. Ms. Eckelman will share a PowerPoint presentation and answer questions from the board.
4. Prevention Intervention: Safe and Drug-free Schools
Rodney Luke will introduce Julie DeBolt, coordinator of assessment and NCLB, who will introduce Francine Sullivan, West Auburn High School counselor; Mandy Jones and Eric Munson, Auburn Youth Resource Prevention/Intervention specialists; Carmela Jaurequi, Auburn Youth Resources MIDD counselor; and Seth Studley and Elizabeth Tail, Cowlitz Indian Tribal Health. The team will present the 2011-12 student assistance programs report and answer questions from the board. This presentation aligns with the Auburn School District 2009-12 strategic improvement plan Goal 4 Policies and Resource Management, Objective 4.c Safe Schools (“Student achievement is fostered through safe learning and work environments”)and 2011-12 Stated District Goals Standard I Provide responsible school board governance, Goal 1 (“Develop and monitor district policies and procedures that support student achievement”). May 29, 2012 Page 5
5. 2011-12 Cascade Middle School Improvement Plan
Rodney Luke will introduce Isaiah Johnson and Darice Johnson, Cascade Middle School principal and assistant principal, respectively; Kanika Watkins-Gatlin, language arts instructor; Aaron Lee, special education instructor; and Christine Arend, physical education instructor. The team will present the 2011-12 Cascade Middle School improvement plan and answer questions from the board. This presentation aligns with the 2009-12 district strategic improvement plan, Goal 1: student achievement, Objective 1.b school improvement plans and the 2011-12 stated district goals, Standard III “create conditions district wide for student and staff success.”
Recommendation: That the board approve the 2011-12 Cascade Middle School Improvement Plan.
6. Approval of Interdistrict Agreements Providing Services to Disabled Students—Auburn Students to Other Districts/Agencies
The district contracts annually with area school districts/agencies for educational programs to disabled students for which programs are not available in Auburn. Permission is requested to contract with the Federal Way, Kent, Highline, Renton, Tacoma, Puyallup, and Sumner School Districts, Washington State School for the Blind, Overlake Hospital Medical Center, Northwest School for the Hearing Impaired, Children’s Hospital and Medical Center, Northwest School of Innovative Learning, Listen and Talk, Children’s Institute for Learning Differences, Birth to Three Developmental Center, and Dynamic Family Services (SKIP) for these services, as needed.
Recommendation: That the superintendent and/or board president be authorized to sign the agreements as outlined.
7. Approval of Agreements Providing Services to Disabled Students—Enumclaw, Sumner, Kent, and Federal Way Students to Auburn
In the past, the Auburn School District has provided educational programs for disabled students from districts whose needs are in excess of the program opportunities there. It is requested that the superintendent and/or board president be authorized to sign these agreements subsequent to approval by the Enumclaw, Sumner, Kent, and Federal Way School Districts’ boards of directors.
Recommendation: That the superintendent/designee be authorized to sign the agreements as outlined.
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT #408
OUTDOOR RECREATION
INTRODUCTION
Course Name Outdoor Recreation Grade Level(s) 9-12
Course Description Students will gain confidence and skills in pursuit of outdoor adventure. They will respectfully and safely learn how to experience the outdoors with minimal impact on the environment through experiential learning. This class aligns with the power standards for Physical Education and meets state requirements for CBAs. Each unit will include minimum two days of fitness related activity.
Pathway Connections Primary Connection Health and Medical Services Secondary Connection Social and Personal Services
Sample Scope and No prerequisites. Due to the impact of weather on the curriculum, Sequence Opportunities students could repeat the semester course. for Students
Cross Credit Physical Education, Health
Equipment Varied
Software Quality Lesson Plans for Outdoor Education (CD ROM)
Supplemental Materials The Backpacker’s Field Manual: A Comprehensive Guide to Mastering Backcountry Skills by Rick Curtis
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT #408
POWER STANDARDS
Course Name Outdoor Recreation Grade Level(s) 9-12
1.2 Demonstrates the knowledge and skills to safely participate in a variety of physical activity Applies and demonstrates rules and safety while participating in physical activity Demonstrates appropriate modification to personal physical strategies, teamwork and sportsmanship to engage all students
1.2 * Acquires knowledge and skills to safely participate in activity Analyzes and compares the potential risk levels in various activities. Analyzes the training principles used for a specific task and takes corrective action when necessary. Analyzes and demonstrates sports specific warm up, cool down and training principles.
1.2 * Demonstrates knowledge and skills to safely participate in activity Analyzes and compares the risk levels and safety issues of exercises Uses and understands training principles that align with their specific goals Analyzes the importance of fitness in the work environment.
1.3 Understands assessments to evaluate and improve personal performance CBA requirements-Fitness Planning Analyzes progress of personal fitness program Understand and implement FITT principle Compare and monitor your progress according to fitness standards Integrates training principles and draws conclusions of the effectiveness of the health plan and then realigns goals.
1.4 Understands the components of skill related fitness and interprets information from feedback, evaluation and self-assessment in order to improve performance.
*Because the class will consist of 9-12 grade students, power standards from each level are incorporated in this class. Please note the asterisks on Power Standards 1.2 represent all levels.
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT #408
COURSE OUTLINE
Course Name Outdoor Recreation Grade Level(s) 9-12
Students will gain confidence and skills in pursuit of outdoor adventure. They will respectfully and safely learn how to experience the outdoors with minimal impact on the environment through experiential learning. This class aligns with the power standards for Physical Education and meets state requirements for CBAs. Each unit will include minimum two days of fitness related activity.
1. Unit One: Group Dynamics A. Icebreakers-Breaking down barriers B. Goal Setting-Personal and group outcomes C. Define Success-Group Success vs Individual Success D. Situational Leadership- E. Experiential Activities-Fostering Listening, Trust, Communication Skills and Strategies, Conflict Resolution, Relationships, Group Process F. Reflection-“What I want from the outdoors: Exploring the sense of wonder the outdoor provides”
2. Unit Two: Strategic and Tactical Planning A. Approaching an outdoor activity-Hiking, Backpacking, climbing, weather, staying safe and comfortable in the outdoors 1. Legality 2. Permits 3. Access to water 4. Distance to site 5. Food, equipment 6. Preparation B. “What not to wear”- Fabrics to wear based on the type of activity C. 10 Essentials for trip planning-Expectations, code of conduct, etc D. Assessing Fitness-The right hike for the right fitness level E. Group Assignment-Fashion show F. Presentations of different layering of clothing for different environments G. Assign Guest Speaker for Unit Five-Student choice on outdoor passion
3. Unit Three: How To/Experiential Learning A. How to: 1. Preventative measures to ensure a positive experience 2. Set up a camp site 3. Build a Fire (Call Fire Dept to allow small fires in Roegner Park) 4. Set up a tent 5. Leave no trace using bathroom 6. Filtering Water 7. Hydration 8. Packing a backpack 9. Cooking on a stove/fire 10. Nutritional needs 11. What don’t you know? B. Group Assignment Demonstrations AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT #408 1. Setting up a campsite-including all of the above
4. Unit Four: Wilderness First Aid A. Prevention Prevention Prevention B. Establishing a Risk Management Plan C. Patient Assessment System D. SOAP Notes E. Shock F. Wound Management G. Burns H. Musculoskeletal Injuries/Splinting J. Dislocations K. Hypothermia/Frostbite/Non freezing cold injuries L. Heat Exhaustion/Dehydration/Heat Stroke/Hyponatremia M. Altitude Illness N. Lightening O. Altered Mental Status P. Anaphylaxis Q. Abdominal Illness and Injury
5. Unit Five: Sample of ordinary people doing extraordinary things A. Julie Moberg-Mountain Biking, hiking, slideshow B. John Erickson-Backpacking, rock climbing, mountain climbing powerpoint C. Meri Benedict-Hiking and Backpacking with animals D. Phil Myka-Kayaking E. Student-Junior Olympic Ski Team F. STUDENT ASSIGNED SPEAKERS will present to the class for the rest of this unit G. Assign student adventure to report on in Unit Seven
6. Unit Six: Assessing fitness in relation to “Your chosen adventure” A. CBA fitness testing-mile, pushups, sit-ups, flexibility B. “Hiking” Lakeland Hills-Add a backpack C. Walking/jogging river trail D. Stairs with weight E. Walking with boots F. Create and apply strategies to improve/maintain fitness based on chosen adventure. Library assignment and activity based.
7. Unit Seven: Student Adventures (or alternate assignments) A. Students present on personal adventures B. At the beginning of the semester, students will be given an assignment that requires a field based adventure with their family/guardians. They will put together a presentation on several aspects of previous learning showing their application of lifelong outdoor skills. C. Comprehensive assessment and class field trip or alternative assignment Possible field trips: Day hike, rock climbing wall, day camping, etc.
8. Unit Eight: Creating an outdoor guide book A. Library research- For personal use in the field AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT #408 1. To include: Overview of each unit of instruction 2. Additional information for each student’s personal interests 3. Presentation to class on additional information and how to use the guide book in their field 4. Final Exam
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT #408
Supplemental Instructional Materials Request Page 1 of 3
INTRODUCTION
The Supplemental Instructional Materials Approval form is to be completed by any individual, building, or program recommending use of supplemental instructional materials. Requests for approval of supplemental materials used on a district-wide basis are submitted on the Supplemental Instructional Materials Approval form to the Executive Director of K-12 Student Learning. The responsibility for the selection/approval of supplemental materials to be used on a single-building basis is delegated to the principal, following recommendations from the librarian and teachers. (Refer to “Instructional Materials Selection” for further information).
Single-building use approval requests shall be submitted to the building principal for approval.
Program use requests (such as those for LAP, Title, Honors, CTE, for example.) shall be submitted to the program administrator and to the building principal for approval. Program requests for usage at more than one building complete the requirements for district-wide use approval requests.
District-wide use approval requests shall be submitted to the Executive Director of K-12 Student Learning for approval recommendation by the District Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment Committee.
This request for supplemental instructional materials must be accompanied with a curriculum framework outlining, at a minimum, units of instruction, Essential Academic Learning Requirements and/or Grade Level Expectations, assessments, and thinking skills. A curriculum framework document is included in the Curriculum Framework section of this handbook
1. Supplementary instructional materials approval is being requested for: Single-building Program Use District-wide Use 2. Submitted by: Julie Moberg Building: Auburn Riverside High School Date: 04-26-2012 3. Content Area: Health and Fitness Grade Level(s): 9-12 Course Title: Outdoor Recreation The Backpacker’s Field Manual, Revised and Updated: A Comprehensive Guide to mastering 4. Title of Material: Backcountry Skills 5. Publisher: Three Rivers Press ISBN: 978-1400053094 Author: Rick Curtis Copyright: 05-24-2005 Online/Web 6: Type of material being requested (check one): Book Software CD/DVD Resources Other please describe: 7. Approximate cost per unit: $11.00 Number of units to be purchased: 40 Total cost to purchase: $440 8. Readability level (specialist input): Unknown When it was first published in 1998, The Backpacker’s Field Manual set the standard for comprehensive backpacking books. Now exhaustively updated to offer a more complete view of backpacking today, it covers the latest developments in gear such as Global Positioning Systems 9. Description of contents: and ultra light hiking equipment, first aid, and Leave No Trace camping, and includes a chapter devoted to outdoor leadership resources and basics. Beginners and experienced hikers alike will find this book indispensable for trip planning strategies and also as a quick reference on the train for: Backcountry skills—how to forecast the weather, identify trees, bear-proof your campsite, wrap an injured ankle, and more—illustrated with more than 100 line drawings. Tricks of the Trail—time-tested practical lessons learned along the way Going Ultra light—downsizing suggestions for those who want to lighten up
10. Has this material been previously approved for use at another grade level? Yes No
Supplemental Instructional Materials Request Page 2 of 3
PROGRAM GOALS. The requested basic instructional materials are consistent with district, building, department, and/or course goals including:
Criteria Yes No N/A 1. Consistency with district and program mission, vision, goals, and objectives 2. Align with state- and district-defined Essential Academic Learning Requirements
and/or Grade Level Expectations 3. Further the systematic and sequence of the program across K-12
DISTRICT AND COMMUNITY STANDARDS. The requested basic instructional materials are consistent with district and community standards including:
Criteria Yes No N/A Provides teachers guidelines to: 1. Present differing viewpoints of controversial issues in order for students to develop
the skills of critical analysis and informed decision making. 2. Promote the diverse character of our world by: a. Presenting cultural and ethnic differences. b. Using language and examples which treat all human beings with respect
and dignity. c. Helping students understand and accept the diversity in the heritage and
culture of our nation’s people. d. Recognizing various types of family structures. e. Recognizing differing socioeconomic levels. f. Recognizing differences in minorities and gender. g. Representing occupational diversity of populations. 3. Materials are appropriate for the age, experience, and maturity level of the student
for whom it is intended. a. Materials are free from inappropriate use of profane, obscene, or
derogatory language. b. Materials are free from inappropriate written or visual graphic sexual
incidents. 8. Materials stimulate student growth in conceptual thinking, factual knowledge, physical fitness, literary appreciations, aesthetic values, and the development of ethical and moral standards. 9. Materials enrich and support the curriculum, taking into consideration the varied
instructional needs, abilities, interests, and maturity levels of the students served.
Materials adopted in the Auburn School District are appropriate for the age, experience, and maturity level of the student for whom they are intended. Teaching and learning materials should not include obscene language or graphic sexual incidents. Rationale must be presented and appropriate instructional goals included where potentially explicit topics or visual aids are used. Alternate learning opportunities will be provided upon request in the case that an objection is made to the approved instructional material.
HIGH SCHOOL GLENCOE ADOPTION IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE
By Auburn Mountainview High School Background Information
Adoption and Implementation of Glencoe High School Series— Algebra, Geometry, Advanced Algebra
Professional Development
Ongoing Support AMHS Backdrop
Flexible Scheduling Algebra & Geometry
PLC Process
Outside Waiver Population
Standards-based Grading Policy
Data-Gathering Process MAPS Scores Academic History Teacher Recommendation MSP/EOC Scores Glencoe Online--ConnectED
Glossary—English and Spanish
Search
Table of Contents
Assessment
Personal Tutor
Math in Motion Assessments
Standards-Based Curriculum State standards Prerequisite skills for future math courses Common Assessments Unit Tests Semester Finals End-of-Year Finals Reviewing Data for Strengths and Weaknesses Resources Hard-copy booklets Examview Kuta Software QUESTIONS? Auburn Mountainview High School Mrs. Eckelman BUSINESS EDUCATION MICROSOFT OFFICE SPECIALIST 2010 MICROSOFT OFFICE SPECIALIST (MOS) 2010
CERTIFICATION PROGRAM OVERVIEW
Pass any ONE of the following Pass any ONE of the following Pass THREE required exams and MOS 2010 exams: MOS 2010 Expert exams: ONE elective exam:
• Word • Word Expert Required • Excel® • Excel® Expert • Word Expert • PowerPoint® • Excel® Expert • Access® • PowerPoint® • Outlook® • Project Electives • SharePoint® • Outlook® OR Access®
Highlights • Returning to MOS brand • Master credential requires Expert • Expert exams return to the lineup level Word & Excel, Core PowerPoint, and either Core Outlook or Access MICROSOFT MASTERS
. Ian Nelson – Master Microsoft Office 2007 and 2010 1st Master Microsoft Office 2007 and 2010 in WA State!
. Isaiah Evans – Master Microsoft Office 2007 and 2010
. Matt Anderson – Master Microsoft Office 2010
. Trevor Halvorson – Master Microsoft Office 2010 MICROSOFT SPECIALISTS
. Abdul Muhammad • Microsoft Office 2007 – Word Expert, Excel Expert, and PowerPoint • Microsoft Office 2010 – Word Expert, and PowerPoint
. Josh Howard • Microsoft Office 2007 – PowerPoint 100% in 17 minutes! Only perfect score this year at AMHS! • Microsoft Office 2010 – Word Expert, Excel Specialist, PowerPoint MICROSOFT CAMPUS
DECEMBER 15, 2011 & MAY 22, 2012 AUBURN MOUNTAINVIEW HIGH SCHOOL AND RAINIER MIDDLE SCHOOL MICROSOFT OFFICE SPECIALIST (MOS) 2010
MOS 2010 continues the legacy of world’s most recognized information worker certification program that accounts for the delivery of over 1 million certification exams annually. MICROSOFT OFFICE 2010
PRODUCT SUITE
Validate skills on the most popular Microsoft Office 2010 programs
Word 2010 Outlook® 2010 Enhanced features, collaborative tools and almost Advanced e-mail organization, search, anywhere file access make it easy to create communication and social networking features professional-quality documents. enhance productivity.
Excel® 2010 Project 2010 New analysis, visualization and access tools make it Robust tools to control project work and schedules, easier to manage and share data. and for staying informed whi8le keeping project teams on track. PowerPoint 2010® Exciting and easy-to-use audio/visual capabilities SharePoint® 2010 make it simple to create powerful, polished Comprehensive content management and search presentations. tools to help improve organizational effectiveness.
Access® 2010 More on Microsoft Office 2010 Simplified tools and new Web databases make it www.microsoft.com/office/2010 easier to track, report and share data. VALUE PROPOSITION / BENEFITS
Institutions Faculty Students
MOS 2010 strengthens institution MOS 2010 optimizes course MOS 2010 enables academic success curriculum, programs, relevance and effectiveness and classroom efficiency. and promotes workforce readiness. stature.
• Provides relevant, state-of-the-art • Accelerates student progress in • Enables students to progress validation of course offerings courses and programs through coursework and curriculum with greater ease and efficiency • Embeds digital literacy within • Strengthens substance and value of programs and curricula curricula • Empowers students with individual differentiation, setting them apart • Offers comprehensive, cost- • Allows instructors to focus on from others pursuing future effective way to give students the coursework, not technology academic admissions and opportunity to develop skills • Provides reliable and validated tool employment necessary for academic work and to measure digital literacy of required by businesses • Delivers real-world, recognized students credentials—MOS is a distinguished • Enhances instructor development • Promotes improved teaching skills credential for students when programs through enhanced digital literacy applying for jobs, demonstrating workplace readiness AUBURN MOUNTAINVIEW HIGH SCHOOL, MICROSOFT OFFICE SPECIALIST COURSE HTTP://WASCHOOLS.CCILEARNING.COM/
86 Certifications to Date! WA SCHOOLS, CCI LEARNING WEBSITE, MAY 2012 Congratulations to the top 5 schools in Washington State who have collectively certified 853 students, staff and faculty in Microsoft Office as of May 16th, 2012! 1. Kamiakin High School - 300 Certifications Passed 2. Hazen Senior High School - 192 Certifications Passed 3. Lindbergh Senior High School - 129 Certifications Passed 4. Kennewick High School - 125 Certifications Passed 5. Anacortes High School - 107 Certifications Passed Congratulations to the top 5 schools in Washington State who have the top pass percentages for the Microsoft Office Specialist exams as of May 16th, 2012! 1. Timberline High School - 73% Pass Rate 2. Walla Walla High School - 71% Pass Rate 3. Pullman High School - 71% Pass Rate 4. Auburn Mountainview High School - 67% Pass Rate 5. Governor John Rogers High School - 67% Pass Rate AMHS has earned MOS 2010 86 industry certifications to date! 4 Master Microsoft Office Specialist Students at AMHS PUBLISHED ARTICLE ABOUT CERTIFICATION AT AMHS CLICK HERE JANUARY 23, 2011 FEATURE ARTICLE, MICROSOFT IT ACADEMY NEWSLETTER
Auburn Mountainview High School continues to have great success with the Microsoft Office Specialist program. Student Ian Nelson recently attained his Microsoft Office 2007 Master certification under the guidance of teacher Patty Eckelman. “We really feel that the partnership between Microsoft and OSPI has been a great opportunity for students to get certified who might not have otherwise due to certain barriers such as accessibility and expense,” said Eckelman. “Being able to provide our students with a lifelong credential that proves that they are technically skilled is wonderful. I can’t think of a better addition to their resumes.” Eckelman added that “from a teacher’s perspective, the certification experience has been seamless. Dan Sweeney and Emily Daubert from CCI Learning Solutions have been fabulous in helping us every step of the way.”
Ian, who plans to enter into either the corporate law or computer engineering field, is a senior at Auburn Mountainview. “Being able to have the opportunity to attain these certifications in high school is awesome,” he said, adding that “this certification is what will set me apart from the rest when I go to apply for jobs.” As for Ian’s test-taking experience, he “definitely enjoyed the process. It’s a lot of hard work, but when you finally see the screen that says ‘Congratulations, you passed!’ it is all worth it. I couldn’t stop smiling!”
Next up for Ian is working towards his Microsoft Office 2010 Master certification and we wish him the best of luck! MICROSOFT VIDEO, FILMED AT AMHS, LAB #114 SUPER STARS: AMHS STUDENTS! MICROSOFT VIDEO AMHS MICROSOFT OFFICE SPECIALIST 2010 STUDENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS Auburn School District May 29, 2012 Topics
ASD Student Assistance Services Overview Julie DeBolt Prevention and Intervention Services Francine Sullivan, Eric Munson, Mandy Jones Mental Health Services Carmela Jaurequi ,Seth Studley, Elizabeth Tail, Questions Safe and Drug Free Schools
Student The ASD Student Assistance Programs are Assistance based upon Title IV legislation of the includes a range of Elementary and Secondary Education services Act. provided K-12 to Although Title IV funding has been address suspended, Auburn continues to serve student needs. students through community partnerships, local resources, and other grant funding. Student Assistance Programs 2011-2012
Let’s take a look at the handout…. PREVENTION INTERVENTION Francine Sullivan, Counselor WAHS- Eric Munson, Mandy Jones, P/I AYR Why we need P/I…
A counselor’s perspective Prevention and Intervention Services by School and Grade Level
Grade Grade Grade Brief Full Grade 9 10 11 12
AMHS 31 36 10 10 8 8
ASHS 44 37 5 13 14 5
ARHS 14 45 10 7 15 13
WAHS 5 22 3 5 5 9
Total 94 140 28 35 42 35 Reported Use by Students Served in P/I Programs
Use Marijuana Alcohol Tobacco Other
AMHS 79.4% 93.1% 70.3% 51.8% 18.5%
ASHS 91.2% 96.8% 54.8% 58.1% 32.0%
ARHS 93.3% 59.5% 69.0% 52.0% 14.2%
WAHS 100.0% 92.6% 51.9% 74.1% 44.4%
Overall 88.6% 85.5% 61.5% 59.0% 27.3% Students with Substance use intervention goals report reductions in 30 day use after program
Before Program After Program
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0% Cigarettes Alcohol Binge Drinking Marijuana Hallucinogens Change in Perception of Risk Students meeting with P/I Specialists report increased perception of risk Before After 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Smokes 1+ Try marijuana Smoked Take 1 or two Takes 5+ drinks packs per day once or twice marijuana drinks daily at a time regularly Resources Final thoughts on P/I MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
Carmela Jaurequi, Auburn Youth Resources, Seth Studley, Elizabeth Tail- Cowlitz Tribal Health Mental Illness Drug Dependency Grant
MIDD Programs Groups
Anger Groups AOD Classroom Girl Groups Presentations Affected Others Insight 1-1
Individual “MOST INDIAN PEOPLE RESIST BEING ABSORBED INTO THE MAINSTREAM AMERICAN CULTURE. MAINSTREAM MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES SERVICES OFFERED BY STATE AND COUNTY AGENCIES ARE OFTEN NOT APPROPRIATE FOR INDIAN CLIENTS. WHEN MENTAL HEALTH PROVIDERS ARE UNFAMILIAR WITH TRIBAL LIFESTYLES, FAMILY VALUES AND COMMUNICATION STYLES, THERE IS A HIGH PROBABILITY OF MISUNDERSTANDING”
A Gathering of Wisdoms, pg 116. Swinomish Mental Health Project Cowlitz Tribal Health-Seattle HHS
In 2011-2012 about 70 students participated in various mental health groups and individual counseling. We had approximately 30 referrals from school personnel that were processed and did not participate.
Three Boys groups- (Olympic & AHS) Four Girls groups- (Chinook, Olympic, & AHS)
Cowlitz Tribe Seattle-HHS
Renewal of MOA into 2013 Expansion of services in West Auburn Launch of Chemical Dependency Program Continuance of Summer Programs The Cowlitz Indian Tribe
It is the goal Students served are enrolled in a and mission federally recognized tribe or a of CIT to provide descendant of a federally enrolled services AI/AN. with the utmost Services are directed to families in need attention of therapeutic services. Billing is and respect to Native directed to private insurance or culture and Medicaid. ways. STUDENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
Auburn School District May 29, 2012 Student Assistance Program 2011-2012 Provider Service Service Title Students Service Description Location Schedule District Provisions Served
Drug Abuse Resistance Education; teaching students ALP, AJ, Access to 5th grade students. DARE Grade 5 Auburn Police DARE good decision making skills to avoid high-risk behavior. CHIN, DS, books. Coordinate DARE ~950 students DARE Graduations scheduled by EH, HZ, IL, graduation served building
Principals will communicate when DARE graduation will LkVw, Lklnd, occur to the department of student learning. LH, TP, WA th
Gang Resistance Education and Training, immunization Security Gildo Rey Access to 5 grade students. Grade 5 Officer GREAT
against delinquency, youth violence, and gang ASD Pioneer, ~130 students membership. Olympic Spring served
Olweus/Steps Bullying Prevention Program- improves peer relations, ASD Teachers All Olweus training for new teachers All K-5 students to Respect improve social climate, reduce related antisocial Elementary behaviors. schools Ongoing Schools may report end of the school year perceptual
survey results.
Teachers Greeters Bullying Prevention Program- improves peer relations, Elementary Provide release time for advisor if All K-5 students ASD
K improve social climate, reduce related antisocial schools needed. - 5 behaviors. Ongoing
Provides mental health counseling, early alcohol and • Private room Grade 6-8 MIDD Counselor Cascade Friday Auburn Youth other drug prevention and intervention services Monday Flexible • Access to private telephone 92+ students Resources • Access to locking file cabinet served Coordinates referrals to treatment providers Mt. Baker Thursday • Computer with internet and
email access MIDD Counselor will report monthly to department of Olympic Wednesday • Academic and discipline
student learning information for students Rainier Tuesday referred for services Nationally recognized, 7th grade, substance abuse Access to 7th Grade Classes for Grade 7
program that gives students insight, understanding, and Auburn Youth Curriculum ~750 students Project Alert actual skills for resisting substance abuse. Resources Cascade Semester 2 served Booster sessions for all grade 7 12 Lessons plus a pre and post test for a total of 14 students at Mt. Baker and Olympic sessions in each 7th grade classroom.
Rainier Project Alert counselor will report monthly to the Semester 1 department of student learning. Provides early alcohol and other drug prevention and • Private room Grade 9-12 intervention services AMHS Tuesdays , Thursdays • Access to private telephone
Mondays Alternate 140 students Auburn Yo • Access to locking file cabinet Assists in referrals to treatment providers • Computer with internet and served in full group in2011-
P/I Counselor P/I email access Strengthens the transition back to school for students ARHS Fridays • Academic and discipline 2012, 94 have who have had problems of alcohol and other drug abuse been seen in uth Resources information for students referred for services brief.
P/I will report monthly to department of student learning. ASHS Wednesdays
Services include: Screenings, Consultation, Referrals, Case management,
School-wide prevention activities, Informational, WAHS Wednesdays workshops, Small group counseling, Individual counseling, INSIGHT Courses
10 hour course -alternate to long term suspension for Counselors or P/I Insight Curriculum, Additional Grade 9-12
Insight disciplinary actions related to drug/alcohol violation hours, room for class, Discipline ~64 students District school AMHS, referral served Counselors will report monthly to department of
- ARHS, ASHS, As needed high student learning, the number of students in courses
WAHS
10 hour course -alternate to long term suspension for Auburn Communicate discipline referrals Grade 6-8 Insight AYR District or
disciplinary actions related to drug/alcohol violation Counselors Youth to MIDD Counselor, Insight ~6 students
School Resources or Curriculum, Additional hours, served
- AYR will report quarterly to department of student on-site One course each semester will be room for class, Discipline referral
Middle learning, the number of students in courses Cascade, Mt. offered at AYR Baker,
Olympic, Rainier
All My Relations Mental Health and Wellness Program Mental Cowlitz Chinook, Inter-local agreement with ASD, Grade K-12 Cowlitz AMR Cowlitz offers Boys/Girls Outdoor Action Groups (focus on social Olympic, access to private phone, ~70students
and behavior skills), Individual and Family Counseling, Health Auburn High communication with school served Anger Management Services are ongoing and can counselors and Native American continue through the summer specialists
Other Agencies Auburn School District partners with various other Various Inter-local agreement with ASD, Grade K-12 agencies to provide CDP and mental health counseling access to private phone, as needed for individual students Various communication with school As needed counselors.
Cascade Middle School 2011-2012
Spartan Excellence: Everyone, Everyday, Everywhere
2010-2011 MSP CELEBRATIONS
6th Grade Reading From 41% to 56% passing!! 6th Grade Math From 37% to 55% passing!! 8th grade Science From 41% to 49% passing!!
Student Demographic Data
2001 2011 Enrollment 692 746
Free and Reduced 41.1% 59.7% American Indian/Alaskan Native 2.1% 1.3% Asian 6.8% Pacific Islander 6.2% Asian/Pacific Islander 7.6% 13.0% Black 3.1% 7.2% Hispanic 6.2% 17.3% White 80.7% 57.4% Two or More Races 3.8% English Lang. Learners 0% 9.4%
Cascade Middle School DEMOGRAPHICS American Indian/Alaskan Native 4% 1% Asian 7% 6% Pacific islander
7% Black
Hispanic 17% 58% White
Two or More Races MAPS Comparison Data CMS 6th Grade Reading Fall 2011 - Winter 2012 100%
P 90% e r 80% c e n 70% t a g 60% e
50% o f 40% S t u 30% d e 20% n t s 10%
0% At Grade Level or Above 1 - 2 Years Below GL 3 - 4 Years Below GL 5 Years or More Below GL Fall 41% 35% 18% 6% Winter 41% 32% 21% 7% MAPS Comparison Data CMS 6th Grade Math Fall 2011 - Winter 2012 100%
P 90% e r c 80% e n 70% t a g 60% e
50% o f 40% S t 30% u d e 20% n t s 10%
0% 5 Years or More Below At Grade Level or Above 1 - 2 Years Below GL 3 - 4 Years Below GL GL Fall 42% 42% 14% 2% Winter 54% 22% 18% 4% MAPS Comparison Data CMS 7th Grade Reading Fall 2011 - Winter 2012 100%
P 90% e r 80% c e n 70% t a g 60% e
50% o f 40% S t u 30% d e 20% n t s 10%
0% At Grade Level or Above 1 - 2 Years Below GL 3 - 4 Years Below GL 5 Years or More Below GL Fall 36% 26% 24% 14% Winter 33% 24% 31% 12% MAPS Comparison Data CMS 7th Grade Math Fall 2011 - Winter 2012
100%
P 90% e r c 80% e n 70% t a g 60% e
50% o f 40% S t 30% u d e 20% n t 10% s
0% At Grade Level or Above 1 - 2 Years Below GL 3 - 4 Years Below GL 5 Years or More Below GL Fall 36% 33% 24% 7% Winter 31% 27% 33% 9% MAPS Comparison Data CMS 8th Grade Reading Fall 2011 - Winter 2012 100%
P 90% e r 80% c e n 70% t a g 60% e
50% o f 40% S t u 30% d e 20% n t s 10%
0% At Grade Level or Above 1 - 2 Years Below GL 3 - 4 Years Below GL 5 Years or More Below GL Fall 42% 16% 24% 18% Winter 43% 17% 24% 16% MAPS Comparison Data CMS 8th Grade Math Fall 2011 - Winter 2012 100%
90% P e r 80% c e n 70% t a g 60% e
50% o f 40% S t u 30% d e 20% n t s 10%
0% At Grade Level or Above 1 - 2 Years Below GL 3 - 4 Years Below GL 5 Years or More Below GL Fall 42% 28% 18% 12% Winter 42% 20% 22% 17% 8th Grade: 2010-2011 Reading
Flat Scores
120 Improved Scores Declined Scores 120 57% of 100 students showed no gains and no 80 losses (flat)
60 49 20% of 41 students
40 showed gains (improved)
20 23% of students 0 showed loss Reading Score Growth During Middle School (declined) 8th Grade: 2010-2011 Math
Flat Scores Improved Scores Declined Scores 140 122 64% of 120 students showed no 100 gains and no losses (flat)
80 20% of students 60 showed gains 38 (improved) 31 40 16% of 20 students showed loss 0 (declined) Math Score Growth During Middle School Meeting the Needs of ALL Students Instruction Question 1 - (What do students need to learn?) Whole class instruction, aligned to the standards
Assessment Question 2 - (How will we know when they learned it?) Common Staff-Created Assessments, Ongoing
Intervention Questions 3/4 - (What will we do when they do/don’t succeed?) Students are flexibly grouped for math intervention, additional practice, and enrichment
Implementation of Standards Based Teaching and Learning
Reviewing the SIP
Meeting as a Building Leadership Team, we reviewed our MSP, MAPS, & DIBELS Data. We also reviewed the strategies originally listed in School Improvement Plan.
Based on this, we recognized:
•Focus needed to be narrowed
•Needed Professional Development on integrating literacy strategies across the content areas
•Appropriate placement of students in either higher math class or an intervention class
•Scope and sequence aligned in every content area
•We need more intervention for reading and math (LAP Math and Reading)
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Focusing on school-wide instructional strategies to address reading and math, with intentional focus on increasing engagement and math retention across grade levels through:
Reading Comprehension
Vocabulary
Math fluency
Math Vocabulary
Cooperative Learning
Alignment of materials with standards at each grade level
Perseverance Respect Integrity Discipline Excellence 2009 – 2012 Cascade Middle School
Strategic Improvement Plan
2009-2012 Auburn School District Strategic Improvement Plan
District Improvement Goal 1: Student Achievement With district support, leadership, and guidance each student will achieve proficiency in the Washington Comprehensive Assessment Program (WCAP) and all schools will meet adequate yearly progress by meeting or exceeding the Washington State uniform bar in reading and mathematics in grades 3 through 8 and 10.
District Improvement Goal 2: Dropout Rate and On-time Graduation Schools will reduce dropout rates and meet additional Adequate Yearly Progress indicators as determined by K-8 attendance and high school on-time graduation rates.
District Improvement Goal 3: Parents/Guardians and Community Partnerships The district and schools will continue to develop partnerships to support student academic achievement and success.
District Improvement Goal 4: Policies and Resource Management The district will focus on improving student academic achievement and narrowing the achievement gaps in its policy decisions and resource allocation.
2009-2010 Stated District Objectives-Student Achievement and Accountability Superintendent implements district strategic improvement plan to establish professional learning communities, become a standards-based district, produce power standards, develop common formative assessments, monitor student achievement, and provide intervention for continuous improvement for 10% more students at or above standards in reading and math.
Superintendent increases high school graduation rates to 95% and increasing high school aggregate credits earned and decreasing failing grades in 9th grade.
Superintendent increases learning enrichment and achievement beyond standards for all students including less represented population.
School Cascade Middle School Date of SIP Team District Improvement Goal Review: November 23, 2009 SIP Team Members Shayna Brown Val Bryant Dave Campbell Marc Deaver Math Electives Electives Science Tad Heinen Brynne Lane Sandra Luettgen Kanika Watkins-Gatlin Assistant Principal School Psychologist Social Studies Language Arts
2
Requirements for School Improvement Plan WAC 180-16-220
Each school in the district shall be approved annually by the school board of directors under an approval process determined by the district board of directors. “At a minimum the annual approval shall require each school to have a school improvement plan that is data driven, promotes a positive impact on student learning, and includes a continuous improvement process that shall mean the ongoing process used by a school to monitor, adjust, and update its school improvement plan”.
The checklist below contains the required elements for School Improvement Plans under WAC 180-16-220. School Improvement Plans are subject to review by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI).
1. Evidence and date of annual school board approval.
2. Evidence staff certification requirements were met. (Highly Qualified)
3. Evidence the plan is based on self-review and participation of required participants (staff, students, families, parents, and community members).
4. Brief summary of use of data to establish improvement.
5. How continuous improvement in student achievement of state learning goals and essential academic learning requirements (EALRs) is promoted.
6. Recognition of non-academic student learning, what and how. (School Climate, bullying, counselors, community resources, partnerships, student leadership; interpersonal relationship skills)
7. Plan addresses characteristics of successful schools.
8. Plan addresses educational equity (gender, race, ethnicity, culture, language, and physical/mental ability).
9. Plan addresses use of technology to facilitate instruction.
10. Plan addresses parent, family, and community involvement.
Failure to make AYP for two consecutive years will result in identification for school improvement beginning with Step 1. The consequences associated with each step are detailed at: http://www.k12.wa.us/ESEA/AdequateYearlyProgress.aspx
3
Signatures for Approval
Step 1:
Department of Student Learning
Rod Luke Assistant Superintendent of Student Learning
Cindi Blansfield Director of Secondary Education
Heidi Harris Director of Elementary Education
Julie DeBolt Coordinator of Assessment and NCLB
Date of Completion - Step 1 Approval
Step 2:
Superintendent
Kip Herren Superintendent
Date of Completion - Step 2 Approval
Step 3:
School Board
Lisa Connors School Board President
Janice Nelson School Board Vice President
Ray Vefik School Board Director
Carol Seng School Board Director
Anne Baunach School Board Director
Date of Completion - Step 3 Approval
5
Auburn School District Mission In a safe environment, all students will achieve high standards of learning in order to become ethically responsible decision makers and lifelong learners.
Auburn School District Vision The vision of Auburn School District is to develop in students the skills and attitudes that will maximize their potential for lifelong learning and ethically responsible decision making.
Cascade Middle School Mission Spartan Excellence: Everyone, Everyday, Everywhere
Cascade Middle School Vision The vision of Cascade Middle School is to address the learning needs of all students through promoting academic, professional, and organizational excellence. These three tenets apply to all components of the schoolhouse and are interdependent in achieving Cascade’s mission.
Background Information WAC 180-16-220 (Requirements for School Improvement Plan) Each school shall be approved annually by the school board of directors under an approval process determined by the district board of directors and “At a minimum the annual approval shall require each school to have a school improvement plan that is data driven, promotes a positive impact on student learning, and includes a continuous improvement process that shall mean the ongoing process used by a school to monitor, adjust, and update its school improvement plan.” School Improvement plans must include a brief summary of use of data to establish improvement; acknowledging the use of data which may include DIBELS, MAP, WLPTII, Credit Attainment, Enrollment in Honors/AP Courses, CEE Perceptual Data, SAT/ACT, Discipline, and MSP or HSPE. Cascade’s School Improvement Team is comprised of eight members from different content areas. Beyond the administrative members, five of the team members also represent the school’s leadership/learning team.
Once membership was established, the team met for the first time in late November 2009. During this first training session, the team learned the initial steps in developing a school improvement plan. The primary focus of this session was on evaluating data. Subsequently, the team then facilitated data carousels in December 2009 at the building level to help determine student learning needs and heighten staff awareness of the school’s reality. Also, in December the team participated in training on how to effectively impact student literacy. This became the foundation for the team’s focus on literacy.
In January 2010, the team reconvened to focus on math and planning for improvement. With the former, the training emphasized the importance of screening to determine math placement for students. In regards to the latter, the training focused on the school improvement plan
6
being an agent of second order change. During this phase of the process, staff and student perceptual data was collected.
At the end of February of 2010, the team reconvened to begin developing the action plan around literacy, math, and communication/collaboration. This action plan focuses on how to best utilize building resources, especially around the area of time, to improve instructional practices. After completing a more formalized version of the strategic plan, the team met in March to reevaluate the three areas of emphasis before submission for final approval.
In June of 2010, staff members participated in training on implementing building plans around literacy and math. This training on implementing the School Improvement Plan continued at the end of August of 2010 when staff returned for the new school year. The emphasis of the training focused on school-wide implementation of word walls, Cornell note-taking, and vocabulary strategies.
Demographic Data Analysis Over the past decade there have been some significant changes in the demographics of Cascade Middle School. During this time, the greatest increase has been in the categories of African American (up 4.1%), Hispanic (up 11.1%), and Low Income (up 23.7%). As of today, those numbers are still increasing and we have seen a huge increase in our Free/Reduced Lunch percentage. As of October 1st, 2011, our free/reduced percentage is 59.7% (up 23.7%). We are also experience growth in our Asian/Pacific Islander population (up 5.4%), most markedly our Marshallese population. It is apparent that Cascade’s demographics are constantly changing and that we need to respond to them.
Discipline and Attendance Analysis In a three year snapshot of the data, there has been an increase in the number of office referrals. Based on Cascade’s demographics African American and Hispanic students are overrepresented in office referrals when compared to their percentage of the overall student body. This same trend is true when looking at students who are assigned an in-school/out of school suspension. The number of suspensions (projected for 2010) is consistent with 2009.
For the 2010-2011 school year Cascade staff implemented a new school-wide discipline model based on four levels of discipline. Level 1 deals with classroom behavior concerns that are dealt with by the teacher. Level 2 are immediate office referrals that are identified as behaviors that demonstrate disrespect to staff and other students. Level 3 are immediate suspensions where safety is a concern. Level 4 are immediate expulsions resulting from drugs, weapons, or assault on staff or student. With these 4 distinct levels of discipline, are decreasing the number of suspensions because the expectations are clearly defined. Every quarter during the 2010-2011 school year, the discipline committee reviewed our discipline policy to evaluate its effectiveness and make any changes needed.
7
Over the past five years there has been an increase in the number of students with unexcused absences. During the 2009 school year, the percentage of unexcused absences was 1.1%, up from 1% in 2008 (an increase of 10%.) All minority groups improved in the area of unexcused absences. To address concerns about attendance, the administrative team and attendance staff has implemented new notification policies in regards to unexcused absences. These policies have increased communication with our families and helped many of them to understand how important it is for their students to be at school on time every day.
In addition to the automated phone call parents receive, the attendance secretary calls homes as a follow up to speak to a parent/guardian to ascertain why the absence was unexcused. Establishing this rapport with parents has helped parents understand the importance of excusing absences beforehand, or excusing the absence immediately upon return. In addition to home visits, we have also implemented regular attendance conferences and contracts with the student, parent/guardian, attendance secretary, administrator and a counselor. Where necessary, incentives were provided as part of the contract to get students to school. An attendance/health focused family night was organized by the attendance secretary to focus on Marshallese families. Additionally, in 2011, Cascade successfully piloted APEX (online learning) at the middle level.
Data Analysis- MAPS For the 2011-12 school year, we just completed our Fall MAPS testing. The numbers show our students between 36% and 42% at or above grade level. Some scores show larger percentages at either end of the achievement spectrum. For example, in 8th Grade Reading, 42% of students scored at or above grade level, while 42% of students scored 3 or more years below grade level.
Data Analysis- Honors/Highly Capable Program The number of students in sixth, seventh, and eighth grade enrolled in Honors/Highly Capable Language Arts and Social Studies has increased for the 2011-2012 school year. Instead of one section offered at each grade level as in previous years, there are two sections in grades 7 and 8. 16% of Cascade’s students are enrolled in Honors/Highly Capable Language Arts and/or Social Studies
Data Analysis – CEE and Cascade Perceptual Surveys Using the 2010 CEE Perceptual Survey Data, a few categories demonstrate areas of growth around the concepts of communication and collaboration. The first area is around trust: resistance. In order to collaborate there needs to be a shift away from the “I vs. They” mindsets. This mindset’s effect on the staff is measured by the difference in responses to questions which are the same, except for starting with “I…” vs. “My colleagues….” The larger the gap, the greater that the embedded “I vs. They” mindset will act as a resisting force to the development of trust and, therefore, collaboration. The survey measured a 68% gap around
8
innovation of ideas (up 10% from 2008; ASD average: 29%), 56% around willingness to change (up 10% from 2008; ASD average: 18%) and a 40% gap around staff accountability (down 18% from 2008; ASD average: 21%).
Along with trust, the indicators of high levels of collaboration and communication demonstrated areas for potential growth at the building level. Only one subcategory, “Our school meets regularly to monitor implementation of our school improvement plan” received more than 50% positive (“Almost Always” or “Often True”) responses.
Data Analysis – Student Survey and Healthy Youth Survey Based on student data from a perceptual survey given in the Winter of 2010, students overall feel they are successful in their language arts and math classes. However, 50% of students stated they need some level of additional support in language arts, while 60% noted the same for math. Students’ overall attitude about staff supporting their personal and academic needs is high – approaching 70%.
In the fall of 2008, sixth and eighth graders completed the Healthy Youth Survey. In terms of enjoyment of school (often or almost always), sixth graders mirrored the state average at 53%, while eighth graders were 8% below the state average at 37%. School safety was an area of growth for eighth graders at Cascade. Only 69% of students felt safe at school, 12% below the state average. A similar concern from the survey arose around the area of depression. One in three eighth grade students reported severe depression in the last year, which is 10% higher than the state.
For the 2010-2011 school year, our sixth and eighth graders will participate in another Healthy Youth Survey. This data will provide us with information on whether or not we are improving in the area of school safety at our school and if students are enjoying school.
In the fall of 2010, sixth and eighth graders completed the Healthy Youth Survey. In terms of enjoyment of school (often or almost always), 6th and 8th grade percentage of students who enjoy school has grown from the 2008 results. For 2010, sixth graders mirrored the state average at 57%. Eighth graders also mirrored the state at 49%. Sixth grade students at Cascade were just above the state average in school safety. 88% of Cascade 6th grade students felt safe at school, compared to 87% of 6th graders in the state. School safety was an area of growth for eighth graders at Cascade. While we are still behind the state, there was an 8% growth in Cascade’s 8th graders reporting they felt safe at school. 77% of 8th grade students felt safe at school, 6% below the state average for 8th grade. In the area of depression, the percentage of Cascade students who reported severe depression was one percent above the state at 26%.
9
Achievement Cascade Middle School is currently in Improvement Step 4. Comparing AYP trigger cells from 2009-10 to 2010-11, Cascade went from “No” to “Yes” in Reading – Hispanic, Math – Hispanic, Reading – Limited English and Math – Limited English. Cascade went from “Yes” to “No” in Reading – Asian/Pacific Islander and Reading – White. Overall, there was a decrease in the number of cells where students did not meet Proficiency Goals from 11 to 9. As in the previous year, Cascade met all Reading and Math Participation Goals.
MSP Reading When analyzing the reading data in cohorts, there is inconsistency in student performance as students move through the three grade levels. Beyond examining cohorts there is a significant achievement gap in student proficiency for Cascade’s Hispanic students when compared to white and Asian students. The gap for the 2010 cohort grew 10%, while the 2011 cohort saw the gap increase by 5% of their three years at Cascade.
MSP Math Similar to the reading data, there is inconsistency in student performance as students move through the three grade levels. Some cohort data indicates years of decline followed by increases, while others appear relatively static. When examining the achievement gap, there is a significant difference in the number of students meeting standard in math. For example, the gap between scores for white and Hispanic students ranges from 37%-43% in the 2010 cohort. Yet the 2011 cohort shows smaller gaps between these two groups, with a 6% difference in 2011.
MSP Science Since 2008 there has been an increase in performance for all students on State science testing. During this time all student groups have narrowed the performance gap with white students: For Asian students, the gap has narrowed from 12% to 7%. For Black students, the gap has progressed from 24% to 16%. For Hispanic students, the gap has closed from 30% to 18%.
MSP Writing When examining student seventh grade writing data, student performance over the last four years has increased for Asian students (15%), decreased slightly for Hispanic (-2% and Black (- 3%) and decreased more significantly for White students (-8%).
Summary Statement: After examining the academic and perceptual data for Cascade Middle School, a variety of realities emerge. The achievement gap for African American and Hispanic students is an ongoing challenge for the building in reading, math, writing, and science. There is a gap for
10
these same ethnic groups around discipline (referrals and suspensions). Reading perceptual data, students’ views about school are positive. Moreover, students are asking us for additional academic support in language arts and math.
Data around staff perception paints an interesting picture. The data demonstrates there are some challenges around trust, staff resistance to change, and collaboration. The first two elements are important factors in establishing the third.
Thus, Cascade’s focuses on literacy, math, and collaboration/communication align with the different data examined in this process.
11
Needs Assessment Data Documents
o Cascade Demographic Comparison: 2000, 2005, and 2009
o Cascade Discipline Data: Suspensions and Office Referrals
o MAPS; Reading and Math: Fall 2011
o Adequate Year Progress Tables: 2008 – 2011
o CEE Results: 2009
o Collaboration and Communication Survey: Winter 2010
o Student Perception Survey: Winter 2010
o Healthy Youth Survey: Fall 2008
o WASL Data; Reading, Math, Writing, Science, and Cohort Trends: 2008 – 2011
12
Cascade Demographic Comparison 2000, 2005, 2009 90 80 70 60 50 40 Percentage 30 20 10 0 2000 2005 2009 American Indian/Alaskan Native 2.6 2 2.5 Asian/Pacific Islander 6.8 6.2 10.1 Black 2.6 4.5 7.6 Hispanic 5.9 9.7 16 White 82 77.7 63.2 Special Education 0 11.2 12.2 ELL 0 3.9 7.4 Low Income 28.6 34.6 48.7 Year
13
Discipline - Suspension (In-School/Out of School) 160 140 120 100 80 60 Number 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Asian 4 8 5 Black 14 19 18 Hispanic 24 34 21 White 74 85 47 Total 116 146 91 Year
Discipline - Suspension (In-School/Out of School) 70 60 50 40 30
Percentage 20 10 0 2008 2009 2010 Asian 3.4 5.5 5.5 Black 12.1 13 19.8 Hispanic 20.7 23.3 23.1 White 63.8 58.2 51.6 Year
14
Discipline Demographics - Office Referrals 70 60 50 40 30
Percentage 20 10 0 2008 2009 2010 Asian 3.3 5.7 4.1 Black 17.3 12.6 17.2 Hispanic 16 19.2 20.7 White 63.3 62.3 58.1 Year
Discipline Demographics - Office Referrals 600 500 400 300
Number 200 100 0 2008 2009 2010 Asian 10 33 21 Black 52 71 89 Hispanic 48 108 107 White 190 351 301 Total 300 563 518 Year
15
Fall 2011 Reading MAPS
8th grade 42% 16% 24% 18%
7th grade 36% 26% 24% 14%
6th grade 41% 35% 18% 6%
At or above grade level 1-2 years below grade level 3-4 years below grade level 5+ years below grade level
Fall 2011 Math MAPS
8th grade 42% 28% 18% 12%
7th grade 36% 33% 24% 7%
6th grade 42% 42% 14% 2%
At or above grade level 1-2 years below grade level 3-4 years below grade level 5+ years below grade level
16
Cascade AYP 2008 Improvement: Step 1 Met Proficiency Goal Met Participation Goal Other Indicator
Student Group Reading Math Reading Math All No No Yes Yes
American Indian N Black Yes No Yes Yes Yes Hispanic No No Yes Yes White Yes No Yes Yes Limited English No No Yes Yes Special Education No No Yes Yes Low Income No No Yes Yes Number of Number of % of Number of Number of 21 | 12 | 63.6% | 4 | 0 Yes: No: Yes/Total: N Cascade AYP 2009 Improvement: Step 2 Met Proficiency Goal Met Participation Goal Other Indicator Student Group Reading Math Reading Math All Yes No Yes Yes American Indian N Number of Number of % of Number of Number of 28 | 5 | 84.8% | 4 | 0 Yes: No: Yes/Total: N 17 Cascade AYP 2010 Improvement: Step 3 Met Proficiency Goal Met Participation Goal Other Student Group Reading Math Reading Math Indicator All No No Yes Yes American Indian N Low Income No No Yes Yes Number of Number of % of Number of Number of 21 | 12 | 63.6% | 4 | 0 Yes: No: Yes/Total: N Cascade AYP 2011 Improvement: Step 4 Met Proficiency Goal Met Participation Goal Other Student Group Reading Math Reading Math Indicator All No No Yes Yes American Indian N Low Income No No Yes Yes Number of Number of % of Number of Number of 24 | 9 | 72.7% | 4 | 0 Yes: No: Yes/Total: N 18 19 Collaboration and Communication Survey – Winter 2010 Our staff shares learning from conferences and seminars they attended We collaboratively plan the integration of literacy & numeracy concepts across the curriculum Parents and community understand the expectations & standards of this school Staff at this school collaborate to improve student learning Almost Always When there is a problem in my school, we talk about how to solve it Often True Sometimes True Staff in our building do not manipulate Seldom True others to achieve their goals Almost Never True Missing There is a willingness to address conflict in this school Staff in our school are consistently truthful Our school meets regularly to monitor implementation of our school improvement plan Students understand the expectations and standards of this school 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% *37 Responses tallied 20 Collaboration and Communication Table – Winter 2010 Almost Always Often True Sometimes True Seldom True Almost Never True Missing Totals Students understand the expectations and standards of 5% 16% 35% 30% 8% 5% 100% this school Our school meets regularly to monitor implementation of our 0% 5% 19% 27% 30% 19% 100% school improvement plan Staff in our school are 11% 30% 35% 16% 8% 0% 100% consistently truthful There is a willingness to 0% 8% 30% 30% 27% 5% 100% address conflict in this school Staff in our building do not manipulate others to achieve 5% 11% 43% 27% 8% 5% 100% their goals When there is a problem in my school, we talk about how to 0% 5% 24% 27% 27% 16% 100% solve it Staff at this school collaborate 0% 6% 40% 26% 17% 11% 100% to improve student learning Parents and community understand the expectations & 0% 6% 33% 36% 14% 11% 100% standards of this school We collaboratively plan the integration of literacy & 0% 11% 16% 22% 24% 27% 100% numeracy concepts across the curriculum Our staff shares learning from conferences and seminars they 0% 0% 27% 19% 35% 19% 100% attended 21 Student Academic Support - Winter 2010 When reading for my classes, I understand what I am 48.3% 33.3% 6.7%6.7% 3.3% reading I need additional instruction in the area of language 13.3% 20.0% 16.7% 25.0% 25.0% arts to improve my skills and knowledge I understand what I need to learn in my language arts 46.7% 33.3% 13.3%3.3% 3.3% class I need additional instruction in the area of math to 16.7% 23.3% 20.0% 26.7% 13.3% improve my skills and knowledge I understand what I need to learn in my math 38.3% 35.0% 20.0% 5.0%1.7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Almost Always Often True Sometimes True Seldom True Almost Never True Program Offerings - Winter 2010 I look forward to the portion of my day where I am in 28.3% 30.0% 28.3% 10.0% 3.3% my core classes I look forward to the portion of my day where I am in 46.7% 23.3% 18.3% 5.0% 5.0% an elective and PE 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Almost Always Often True Sometimes True Seldom True Almost Never True Classroom and School Climate - Winter 2010 I feel the staff at the school cares about my education 68.3% 15.0% 10.0%3.3%3.3% I feel the staff at the school cares about me as a 40.0% 35.0% 13.3%3.3% 8.3% person When I am having trouble with an assignment or concept in class, my teacher provides me with 45.0% 33.3% 13.3%1.7% 6.7% support so I can better understand 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Almost Always Often True Sometimes True Seldom True Almost Never True 22 6th Grade Reading MSP 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Percentage Meeting Meeting Standard Percentage 2008 2009 2010 2011 Asian 90% 77% 58% 57% Pacific Islander 25% Black 59% 69% 24% 32% Hispanic 46% 49% 23% 49% White 74% 68% 47% 64% 6th Grade Math MSP 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Percentage Meeting Meeting Standard Percentage 2008 2009 2010 2011 Asian 35% 43% 65% 57% Pacific Islander 19% Black 29% 31% 14% 32% Hispanic 13% 22% 11% 54% White 50% 43% 44% 62% 23 7th Grade Reading MSP 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Percentage Meeting Meeting Standard Percentage 2008 2009 2010 2011 Asian 42% 61% 44% 60% Pacific Islander 15% Black 29% 33% 47% 47% Hispanic 29% 24% 32% 18% White 55% 59% 54% 44% 7th Grade Math MSP 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Percentage Meeting Meeting Standard Percentage 2008 2009 2010 2011 Asian 42% 61% 44% 60% Pacific Islander 23% Black 6% 29% 24% 22% Hispanic 27% 21% 21% 16% White 43% 58% 50% 41% 24 7th Grade Writing MSP 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Percentage Meeting Meeting Standard Percentage 0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 Asian 58% 83% 62% 73% Pacific Islander 31% Black 53% 71% 47% 50% Hispanic 44% 28% 41% 42% White 62% 70% 61% 54% 8th Grade Reading MSP 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Percentage Meeting Meeting Standard Percentage 2008 2009 2010 2011 Asian 72% 55% 65% 67% Pacific Islander 25% Black 24% 40% 57% 65% Hispanic 31% 44% 30% 39% White 56% 65% 69% 63% 25 8th Grade Math MSP 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Percentage Meeting Meeting Standard Percentage 2008 2009 2010 2011 Asian 50% 47% 48% 56% Pacific Islander 13% Black 12% 5% 30% 24% Hispanic 15% 24% 16% 36% White 44% 52% 59% 42% 8th Grade Science MSP 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Percentage Meeting Meeting Standard Percentage 0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 Asian 24% 35% 39% 50% Pacific Islander 13% Black 12% 10% 26% 41% Hispanic 8% 22% 16% 39% White 36% 46% 52% 57% 26 2010 Cohort Reading MSP 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Percentage Meeting Meeting Standard Percentage 2008 2009 2010 Asian 90% 61% 65% Black 59% 33% 57% Hispanic 46% 24% 30% White 74% 59% 69% 2010 Cohort Math MSP 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Percentage Meeting Meeting Standard Percentage 0% 2008 2009 2010 Asian 35% 61% 48% Black 29% 29% 30% Hispanic 13% 21% 16% White 50% 58% 59% 27 2011 Cohort Reading MSP 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Percentage Meeting Meeting Standard Percentage 2009 2010 2011 Asian 77% 44% 67% Pacific Islander 25% Black 69% 47% 65% Hispanic 49% 32% 39% White 68% 54% 63% 2011 Cohort Math MSP 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Percentage Meeting Meeting Standard Percentage 2009 2010 2011 Asian 43% 44% 56% Pacific Islander 13% Black 31% 24% 24% Hispanic 22% 21% 36% White 43% 50% 42% 28 Improvement Goals As Cascade Middle School’s school improvement team, we used the available data resources (academic/perceptual), input from staff during the data carousel and guidance from the facilitators to create SMART goals in three areas of focus: literacy, math, and collaboration/communication. As a team, we determined that these three goals, reflecting realistic and steady improvement, would most positively impact student learning. SMART Goal 1: Literacy • The percentage of Cascade students meeting standard at each grade level on the state assessment in reading will increase 5% each year from 58.1% in 2009 to 73.1% in 2012. SMART Goal 2: Math • The percentage of Cascade students meeting standard at each grade level on the state assessment in math will increase 5% each year from 42.5% in 2009 to 57.3% in 2012. SMART Goal 3: Collaboration and Communication • Staff perception of collaboration and communication effectiveness as measured by staff survey will increase 10% each year with a target of 42% (Almost Always or Often True) in 2012. 29 Study Teams (Each study team should consider parent/community involvement, cultural competency and integration of technology as potential strategies in each goal area e.g. How can parent involvement, cultural competence and technology assist the school in meeting its reading goal?) Literacy Goal Group: SIP Team (Bryant, D. Johnson, Luettgen, Watkins-Gatlin) Reading Goal Group Research Materials: • Improving Adolescent Literacy: Effective Classroom and Intervention Practices (Institute of Education Sciences – 2008) • Six Steps to Better Vocabulary Instruction (Educational Leadership – 2009) • Threads of Reading (Karen Tankersley – 2003) • Academic Language! Academic Literacy! (Eli R. Johnson – 2009) • Bringing Words to Life: Robust Vocabulary Instruction (Beck, McKeown, Kucan – 2002) Math Goal Group: SIP Team (Brown, Campbell, Deaver, D. Johnson) Math Goal Group Research Materials: • Assisting Students Struggling with Mathematics: RTI for Elementary and Middle Schools (Institute of Education Sciences – 2009) • High Performance in High Poverty Schools: 90/90/90 and Beyond (Reeves – 2003) • Why Aren’t More Minorities Taking Advanced Math (Educational Leadership - 2007) • Making the Mathematics Curriculum Count (NASSP - 2007) Supportive Learning Environment Goal Group: Entire SIP Team Supportive Learning Environment Research Materials: • Learning By Doing (DuFour, DuFour, Eaker, and Many – 2006) • Revisiting Professional Learning Communities at Work (DuFour, DuFour, Eaker – 2006) • Making Creative Schedules Work! In Middle and High Schools (Merenbloom and Kalina - 2007) 30 LITERACY ACTION PLAN Instructional Program Description The instructional program around literacy focuses on providing staff professional development in the areas of vocabulary acquisition and comprehension strategies. In the classroom, students will receive vocabulary instruction for terminology common to all classrooms and specific to each content area. Addressing student learning needs in comprehension is achieved by teaching all student common strategies around note taking and GIST. One additional components of the program is to develop an online toolbox for staff to address literacy. Highly Qualified Staff In the 2011-12 school year, 92% of all classes at Cascade are taught by teachers who are highly qualified in that content area. In order to achieve goals in literacy, it is imperative that teachers who provide instruction in this area are highly qualified. Assessment Decisions A variety of different assessments will be used to measure student learning and subsequently guide decisions about instructional practices and allocation of resources. While the MSP will be used as summative assessment, formative assessments will range from MAPS to teacher created to provide the necessary feedback. Assistance to Students Experiencing Difficulty When addressing students who are struggling with literacy, Cascade’s school improvement plan focuses on two key components. These components are building vocabulary and comprehension skills for all students. Developing school wide and content area specific vocabulary walls will provide a resource for all students and staff to access. Increasing staff member’s instructional strategies to teach students comprehension skills will help in this area across content areas. Timeline for Planning Process During the spring of 2010, the school’s PDTIP was developed, outlining the professional development plan around literacy for the next school year. In June 2010, the staff received training that provided a foundation for the subsequent Fall. Also during this period and into the summer, we finalized vocabulary and comprehension strategies. 31 Planning Implementation Calendar, 2010-2011: As stated earlier, the spring of 2010 provided the SIP Team and BLT opportunities to map out the professional development necessary for the selected vocabulary and comprehension skills. Each month, except December, staff received training in implementing instructional strategies. Those strategies requiring the most time were part of the September building determined days. Action Plan The literacy action plan was facilitated by Cascade’s by two staff members with extensive background in language arts. Based on research and training in November, addressing literacy through vocabulary and comprehension has been at the forefront of discussion. The discussion has included making literacy a focus for all staff, requiring professional development to promote greater fidelity and consistency. The established goal of 5% increase each year in reading is realistic and creates upward momentum in proficiency. To monitor effectiveness of implementation, staff will use a variety of teacher-created formative assessments and rubrics to evaluate instruction and learning. This information will be reported monthly to administration via the content area leaders. MATH ACTION PLAN Instructional Program Description The instructional program around math primarily focuses providing tiered instruction based on student needs. Within this tiered instruction, instruction focuses on increasing engagement and math retention through math fluency, vocabulary, cooperative learning, and alignment of materials. Highly Qualified Staff In the 2011-12 school year, 92% of all classes at Cascade are taught by teachers who are highly qualified in that content area. In order to achieve goals in math, it is imperative that teachers who provide instruction in this area are highly qualified. Assessment Decisions The MSP will be used to determine effectiveness of Cascade’s School Improvement Plan. However, MAPS data will be instrumental in placing students in the appropriate level of math instruction throughout the school year and for providing checkpoints along the way. 32 Assistance to Students Experiencing Difficulty Elements of the literacy component of Cascade’s school improvement plan are integrated into the math portion. In addition, providing tiered instruction in math is key to addressing the needs of students below grade level. For the 2011-2012 school year, Cascade offers tiered math instruction at all three grade levels. Timeline for Planning Process As the master schedule was developed during the spring of 2010, MAPS and other data for current and roll-up students were used to determine the appropriate number of section offerings to tier math instruction. This was a driving factor in this process. Elements from the literacy component relating to math with follow the same timeline. In June, the staff had the opportunity to receive training in math around elements of the SIP plan. Planning Implementation Calendar, 2010-2011 Similar to the literacy, some of the monthly staff professional development focus on math. Beside professional development, student achievement in math is part of an ongoing evaluation to promote the required fluidity between the tiers of instruction. Greater detail of this plan is found in the Calendar for Implementation – Year 1 section of this document. Action Plan The math action plan was facilitated by Cascade’s math content area leader with input from members of the SIP team and other math teachers. Best instructional practices were considered in the development of strategies along with a goal of creating some level of school wide focus in math through common vocabulary. By providing tiered math instruction, the team believes Cascade can create consistent gains in student math success. The use of MAPS and teacher collected data will be pivotal in determining the fluidity of student program placement during the school year, since students will move between different classes as necessitated by their progress. COMMUNICATION/COLLABORATION ACTION PLAN Instructional Program Description The collaboration and communication component of the improvement plan is based in two areas. The first area is professional development. Using the available resources, like building hours, will promote opportunities for staff to collaborate and share professional knowledge/skill. The second area is creating opportunities for staff to collaborate and communicate about student learning. 33 Highly Qualified Staff In the 2011-12 school year, 92% of all classes at Cascade are taught by teachers who are highly qualified in that content area. In order to provide quality instruction in any area, it is imperative that teachers who provide instruction in these areas are highly qualified. Assessment Decisions Cascade will continue to administer the staff and student surveys in the fall, winter, and spring to evaluate effectiveness of SIP implementation. Assistance to Students Experiencing Difficulty Providing professional development that creates an increased level of consistency in best practices in all classrooms is helping to address the needs of all students. Beyond the job embedded professional development, staff members have increased opportunities to collaborate around elements related to student learning. Timeline for Planning Process Cascade’s leadership team will explore possible avenues for increasing opportunities for staff collaboration and communication in preparation for this year. This will include possible adjustments to the master schedule or requesting release time for content areas to continue developing learning targets and begin developing common assessments. Planning Implementation Calendar, 2010-2011: Cascade’s PDTIP guides the collaboration and communication amongst staff. This professional development plan is outlined in the Calendar for Implementation – Year 1 section of this document. Action Plans Of the three action plans, this one was created with the greatest level of collaboration by all members of the SIP team. This collaboration was necessary, since it drives the staff’s professional development, instructional practices and allocation of resources. The data from the staff collaboration and communication survey was pivotal in this action plan. It is apparent that the staff feels there is a void of opportunities at the building level to grow professionally and/or develop a guaranteed and viable curriculum. From the team’s perspective, this portion of the SIP has the potential for the most significant gains based on data. To assure building level implementation, content leaders are responsible to provide administration with monthly reports relating to training and building expectations around curriculum, instruction and assessment. 34 School Improvement Planning SMART Goal Worksheet SMART GOAL School Name: Cascade Middle School Literacy Subject Area: Target Population: All students, with an emphasis on African American, Hispanic, Low Income, and Special Education. Based on the data from the 2008-2009 WASL, 65.5% (6th grade) 51.7% (7th grade), and 57.6% (8th grade) of Cascade Our Reality: students meet standard in reading. However, students in the following subgroups (African American, Hispanic, Low Income, and Special Education) score below the previously cited percentage. The percentage of Cascade students meeting standard at each grade level on the MSP in Reading will increase by 5% Our SMART Goal: each year from 58.1% in 2009 to 73.1% in 2012. Goal #1: Student Achievement Objective 1A: Professional Learning Communities Strategies from the 1.a.3: Develop common formative assessments aligned to the power standards that prepare students for summative District Strategic assessments.. Improvement Plan Objective 1B: School Improvement Plans 1.b.2: Implement professional development programs that are based upon needs established in school improvement plan. Evidence of SMART Goal Action Steps Responsibility Timeline Resources Attainment Introduce school-wide vocabulary for Assistant Principal Spring 2010 • Part of building 21 hours Formative: Student improvement implementation in fall of 2010. and SIP Team for instruction on vocabulary assessments • Word Walls BLT • Adrianne Hartness Summative: Student Content leads improvement on MSP. • School-wide Vocabulary Process • Shared vocabulary lists • Assessment Strategies • Vocabulary assessments • Rich instruction *Rich is defined as actively involved in using and thinking about word meanings and creating lots of association among words. Introduce school-wide comprehension Assistant Principal Spring 2010 for • Part of building 21 hours Formative: Student improvement strategies for implementation in fall of 2010. and SIP Team strategies with for instruction on GIST assessments • Reading Comprehension Toolkit BLT toolkit • Adrianne Hartness Summative: Student Content leads development improvement on MSP. o Common note-taking strategies • Note-taking template GIST summarizing ongoing. o • GIST rubric • Assessment Strategies Get the main idea 35 Identify important Details So what? (Significance) Transform notes into a Summary. • Reading Comprehension Toolkit (on-line collection of strategies, templates, and other tools available for teachers on Cascade’s site. • Creation of a rubric to assess student learning. Student and staff monitoring of MAPS All students and • Professional performance, including the tracking of data all staff development for staff over time by students. on how to explain MAPS data to students. Development of common assessments within Collaboration with • Part of building 21 hours the content areas with a focus on literacy. all staff as for staff professional • Creating pacing guides facilitated by development. content area leads 36 School Improvement Planning SMART Goal Worksheet SMART GOAL School Name: Cascade Middle School Math Subject Area: Target Population: All students, with an emphasis on African American, Hispanic, Low Income, and Special Education. Based on the data from the 2008-2009 WASL, 36.9% (6th grade) 49.8% (7th grade), and 40.8% (8th grade) of Cascade Our Reality: students meet standard in math. However, students in the following subgroups (African American, Hispanic, Low Income, and Special Education) score below the previously cited percentage. The percentage of Cascade students meeting standard at each grade level on the MSP in Math will increase by 5% Our SMART Goal: each year from 42% in 2009 to 57.3% in 2012. Goal #1: Student Achievement Objective 1A: Professional Learning Communities Strategies from the 1.a.3: Develop common formative assessments aligned to the power standards that prepare students for summative District Strategic assessments. Improvement Plan 1.a.4: Implement a pyramid of interventions at each school to address students not meeting standard. Objective 1B: School Improvement Plans 1.b.2: Implement professional development programs that are based upon needs established in school improvement plan. Evidence of SMART Goal Action Steps Responsibility Timeline Resources Attainment Introduce school-wide vocabulary for Assistant Principal Establish base • District supported MAPS/WASL scores will increase implementation in fall of 2010. and SIP Team words in Fall facilitators (Adrianne • Word Walls 2010, update Hartness and Greg • School-wide Vocabulary Process monthly Benner) • Assessment Strategies • State and building identified vocabulary words for each classroom 37 Math intervention for Tier 3 students Administration Fall 2010 – • MAPS/MSP Scores MAPS/WASL scores and Math team classes to be • Greg Benner Students will move out of tier 3 lead adjusted status • Intervention Materials quarterly (Corrective Math?) • Time during school day in addition to core math class Intentional focus on increasing engagement Administration Ongoing • Collaboration Time Math fluency will increase on and math retention across grade levels and Math team • Standards-based MAPS scores/grade level through: vocabulary assessments Percentage of students • Math fluency • Professional • Math Vocabulary development around completing work will increase MAPS/WASL scores will increase • Cooperative Learning peer- Vocabulary knowledge will • Alignment of materials with tutoring/cooperative increase per common assessments standards at each grade level learning, teaching math vocabulary, math fluency • Common assessments for fluency and vocabulary at each grade level • Math skill practice materials 38 School Improvement Planning SMART Goal Worksheet SMART GOAL School Name: Cascade Middle School Collaboration and Communication Subject Area: Target Population: Cascade Certificated and Classified Staff Currently, professional development for staff only occurs periodically through the school year. The majority of professional development occurs in September and in October. This does not allow for ongoing, job embedded training for staff. In Our Reality: addition, there is a certain level of disconnect between professional development offerings and needs to close the achievement gap. Staff perceptions of collaboration and communication effectiveness as measured by staff survey will increase from 12% (Almost Our SMART Goal: Always or Often True) in 2010 to 42% in 2012. Goal #1: Student Achievement Objective 1A: Professional Learning Communities Strategies from the District 1.a.1: Establish Professional Learning Communities at each school. Strategic Improvement Plan Objective 1B: School Improvement Plans 1.b.2: Implement professional development programs that are based upon needs established in school improvement plan. Evidence of SMART Goal Action Steps Responsibility Timeline Resources Attainment Monthly staff meeting (available before and Administration Monthly – • Utilize 2.25 hours of Increase in staff perception data after school) focusing on schoolwide and Content Area September building 21 allotment. around following: instructional strategies to address reading Leaders through June • We collaboratively plan the and math. (except integration of literacy & numeracy December) concepts across the curriculum • Our school meets regularly to monitor implementation of our school improvement plan • Staff at this school collaborate to improve student learning • Our staff shares learning from conferences and seminars they attended 39 Creating and implementing PDTIP focused on Administration August and • Utilize portion of Implementation and dialogue on instructional strategies to address reading with input from September building 21 allotment. common assessments. and math (see reading and math action BLT, SIP, and Building Hours • District/outside steps). Inservice Advisory presenter(s). Monthly reporting of • Training on various assessment • Clock hours for Waiver implementation of strategies strategies. Days • Monthly reporting tool Explore master schedule options to include Administrative Spring 2010 • None Master schedule with weekly collaboration for all content teams Team, Building collaborative time components. and for common plan times (Year 1) Learning Team, AEA Building Representation Apply for release time for staff for Principal Spring 2010 • Financial support from collaboration during school day. district for guest • Timeline for days teachers. 40 CALENDAR OF IMPLEMENTATION – YEAR 1 March 2010 Literacy Math Collaboration/Communication March 30 March 30 March 30 Present SIP Draft to BLT and Present SIP Draft to BLT and send Present SIP Draft to BLT and send to all staff to all staff send to all staff April 2010 Literacy Math Collaboration/Communication April 15 April 15 April 15 Submission of Finalized SIP Submission of Finalized SIP Submission of Finalized SIP document document document April April April 20 MAPS Testing MAPS Testing Master Schedule Dialogue with BLT May 2010 Literacy Math Collaboration/Communication May 5 May 5 MSP Testing MSP Testing May 28 May 28 Beginning Determining Building Identify Tier 1,2,3 students using Level Vocabulary MAPS and other data May 28 May 28 Prioritize and Solidify Prioritize and Solidify Professional Development Professional Development Calendar for 2010-2011 Calendar for 2010-2011 June 2010 Literacy Math Collaboration/Communication June 14 June 14 June 18 Staff Training on Literacy Staff Training on Numeracy Submit PDTIP for 2010-2011 June 14 June 25 Solidify Building Level Common Apply for release time for Vocabulary (2 per month) for collaboration with ASD and 2010-2011 school year determine calendar for 2010- 2011. July/August 2010 Literacy Math Collaboration/Communication July July July Develop student self-assessment Develop student self-assessment Develop staff checklist for of learning document of learning document implementation of SIP plan August August Create Word Walls Plan back to school retreat and 41 August professional development Create pre and post assessments August for vocabulary Create online toolkit for staff August resources around professional Create building template for development notetaking and GIST strategies August Create rubric for comprehension strategy September 2010 Literacy Math Collaboration/Communication September September September Fall MAPS Testing Fall MAPS Testing Professional Development Focus: September 24 September 24 1. Building-wide Professional Development Series Professional Development Series Comprehension Strategy on Literacy on Numeracy 2. Creating Common Assessments 3. MAPS Data for Students 4. Student Self-Assessment of Learning September 14 Staff Meeting Focus – Comprehension September 30 Submit Monthly Implementation of Strategies Report October 2010 Literacy Math Collaboration/Communication October October October 12 Fall MAPS Testing Analysis Fall MAPS Testing Analysis Staff Meeting Focus – October 22 October 24 Vocabulary Strategies Professional Development Series Professional Development Series October 29 on Literacy on Numeracy Submit Monthly Implementation of Strategies Report November 2010 Literacy Math Collaboration/Communication November 9 Staff Meeting Focus – Extracting Details for Text Strategies November 30 Submit Monthly Implementation of Strategies Report December 2010 42 Literacy Math Collaboration/Communication January 2011 Literacy Math Collaboration/Communication January January January 11 Winter MAPS Testing Winter MAPS Testing Staff Meeting Focus – Exit Activity Strategies Midyear Collaboration/Communication Survey January 28 Submit Monthly Implementation of Strategies Report February 2011 Literacy Math Collaboration/Communication February February February 8 Winter MAPS Testing Analysis Winter MAPS Testing Analysis Staff Meeting Focus – SOLVE within the Content Areas and Reasonable Answers February 22 Submit Monthly Implementation of Strategies Report March 2011 Literacy Math Collaboration/Communication March 14 March 14 March 8 Professional Development Series Professional Development Series Staff Meeting Focus – on Literacy on Numeracy Vocabulary Strategies Revisited March 31 Submit Monthly Implementation of Strategies Report April 2011 Literacy Math Collaboration/Communication April April April 12 Spring MAPS Testing Spring MAPS Testing Staff Meeting Focus – Comprehension Strategies Revisited April 29 Submit Monthly Implementation of Strategies Report May 2011 Literacy Math Collaboration/Communication May May May 10 43 Spring MAPS Testing Analysis Spring MAPS Testing Analysis Staff Meeting Focus – May May Vocabulary Strategies Revisited MSP Testing MSP Testing End of Year May 9 May 9 Collaboration/Communication Review/Revise SIP plan Review/Revise SIP plan Survey May 9 May 9 May 27 Professional Development Series Professional Development Series Submit Monthly Implementation on Literacy on Numeracy of Strategies Report June 2011 Literacy Math Collaboration/Communication June June June 14 Determine Professional Determine Professional Staff Meeting Focus – Development Calendar (PDTIP) Development Calendar (PDTIP) Collaboration/Communication for 2011-2012 for 2011-2012 Results June 13 June 13 Celebration of Student Learning Celebration of Student Learning 44 May 29, 2012 Page 6 PERSONNEL--CERTIFICATED AND CLASSIFIED 1. Certificated and Classified Personnel Report Attached is the personnel report, for certificated and classified personnel, for the board’s approval. Recommendation: That the board approve the attached report. Tuesday, May 29, 2012 PERSONNEL--CERTIFICATED Curriculum/Non-Curriculum hours 21st century grant/MSP tutoring 1 . Hill, Angela 10 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 4/27/2012 5th grade parent night 1 . Hawk, Mindy 2 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/24/2012 2 . McGowan, Tina 2 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/24/2012 3 . Park, Steven 2 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/24/2012 4 . Vatne, Bruce 2 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/24/2012 5 . Winter, Susan 2 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/24/2012 Accelerating young minds 1 . Mayer, Margaret 2.5 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 4/26/2012 Additional hours 1 . Blosser, Rebekah 7 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 4/1/2012 Administer MSP test 1 . White, Tammy 14 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/2/2012 AP testing 1 . Dooley, Laurie 10 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/1/2012 2 . Koon, Mary 40 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/7/2012 3 . Patnode, Marianne 40 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/7/2012 Camp Auburn Page 1 Tuesday, May 29, 2012 1 . Cairney, Dawne As needed effective 6/5/2012 Stipend $409 2 . Cox, John As needed effective 5/2/2012 Stipend $409 3 . DeFrancesco, Andrew As needed effective 5/15/2012 Stipend $409 4 . Fitzgerald, William Michael As needed effective 5/15/2012 Stipend $409 5 . Hanson, Marlene As needed effective 5/15/2012 Stipend $409 6 . Jeffreys, Brendan As needed effective 5/15/2012 Stipend $409 7 . Jones, Jana As needed effective 5/2/2012 Stipend $409 8 . Lagerquist, Jennifer As needed effective 5/15/2012 Stipend $409 9 . Leaf, Vickie As needed effective 5/9/2012 Stipend $272 10 . Leir, Autumn As needed effective 4/22/2012 Stipend $409 11 . Markwell, John As needed effective 6/5/2012 Stipend $409 12 . Massimino, Joseph As needed effective 5/1/2012 Stipend $409 13 . McIntyre, Leah As needed effective 5/15/2012 Stipend $409 14 . Sandland, Tyler As needed effective 5/15/2012 Stipend $409 15 . Signal, Michael As needed effective 4/22/2012 Stipend $409 CIA approved PE/Health course 1 . Benedict, Meri 54 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/1/2012 Page 2 Tuesday, May 29, 2012 2 . Moberg, Julie 54 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/1/2012 Credit recapture 1 . Horlick, Robert 110 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 4/1/2012 HS Glencoe math series implementation 1 . Clancy, Michael 2 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/3/2012 2 . O'Brien, Leahmarie 2 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/3/2012 IEP meeting 1 . Chavez, Luis 0.5 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 3/22/2012 2 . Furth, Paul 0.5 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 3/22/2012 3 . Jordan, Dianne 0.5 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 3/22/2012 4 . Pridemore, Cindy 0.5 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 3/22/2012 IEP work 1 . Dean, Julie 28 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/17/2012 IEPmeeting 1 . Light, Robin 1 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/10/2012 2 . Snyder, Cheryl 1 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/10/2012 Involuntary room move 1 . Harlor, Roxanne 14 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/4/2012 2 . Lamb, Peter 14 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 4/27/2012 Page 3 Tuesday, May 29, 2012 3 . Linn, Angela 14 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/4/2012 4 . McCarthy, Callie 14 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 4/27/2012 5 . McKenzie, Julie 14 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/4/2012 6 . Miller, Dianna 14 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 4/27/2012 7 . Santman, Darcie 14 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 6/19/2012 Involuntary room move and change of assignment 1 . Dutoit, Michelle 28 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 4/27/2012 2 . Prain, Gregory 28 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 4/27/2012 Involuntary transfer 1 . Arnold, Mindy 14 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 4/27/2012 2 . Johnson, Beth 14 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/15/2012 3 . Mayer, Margaret 14 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/15/2012 4 . Rodseth, Kent 14 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 6/20/2012 Kindergarten readiness screening 1 . Gustafson, Gena 105 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/2/2012 Kindergarten round-up 1 . Carlson-Ray, Carol 1.5 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/8/2012 2 . Carrizosa, Carla 1.5 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/8/2012 Page 4 Tuesday, May 29, 2012 3 . Garrido, Kathleen 1.5 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/8/2012 4 . Pozzi, Lena 1.5 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/8/2012 LAP APEX summer school program 1 . Moyd, Cheryl 85 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/1/2012 LAP Biology recap summer school 1 . Shaw, Judith 65 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/1/2012 LAP geometry recap summer school 1 . LaPlante, Eric 80 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/1/2012 LAP recap summer school program 1 . James, Susan E. 80 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/1/2012 2 . Rohlff, Geri 80 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/1/2012 MSP early bird 1 . Carter, Amber 16 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 3/1/2012 2 . Diehm, Terri 16 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 3/1/2012 3 . Donnelly, Holly 16 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 3/1/2012 4 . Kearney, Karen 16 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 3/1/2012 5 . Morris, Gary 16 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 3/1/2012 6 . Wickstrom, Scott 16 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 3/1/2012 MSP testing Page 5 Tuesday, May 29, 2012 1 . Allen, Nicole 7 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 4/25/2012 Outdoor recreation 1 . Moberg, Julie 3 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/1/2012 Prep for ARTeam workshop 1 . Goranson, Delci 1 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/9/2012 Prep time for ARTeam workshop 1 . Volk, Travis 1 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/9/2012 Private school consultation 1 . Jordan, Keri 10 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 4/13/2012 Reading and math support work 1 . Fasso, Robert 3 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 9/7/2011 2 . laush Jr., Larry 3 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 9/7/2011 3 . Rayburn, Colleen 3 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 9/7/2011 4 . Stoliker, Dornford 3 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 9/7/2011 5 . Sullivan, Francine 3 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 9/7/2011 6 . Watson, Kenneth 3 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 9/7/2011 Rotary catering 1 . Killian, Marci 12 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/14/2012 SAT prep class instructor Page 6 Tuesday, May 29, 2012 1 . Hammer, Evelyn 5 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 4/28/2012 2 . Tauzer, Leslie 5 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 4/21/2012 Study room 1 . Alexander, Nancy 10 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 9/7/2011 2 . Jeffreys, Christa 10 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 9/7/2011 3 . Knapp, Stephanie 10 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 9/7/2011 4 . Lewis, Steven 10 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 9/7/2011 5 . Schuman, Susan 10 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 9/7/2011 6 . Wynn, Kimberly 10 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 9/7/2011 Summer school 1 . Bowler, Donna 50 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 6/25/2012 2 . Connelly, Ericka 50 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 6/25/2012 3 . Gunderson, Erik 45 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 6/25/2012 4 . Hansen, Jessica 25 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 6/25/2012 5 . Henry, Katie 5 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 6/25/2012 6 . Kaup, Thomas 80 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 6/25/2012 7 . Ladage, Adam 80 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 6/25/2012 Page 7 Tuesday, May 29, 2012 8 . Morris, Bruce 15 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 6/25/2012 Tutoring 1 . Criddle, Jayne 40 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/9/2012 2 . Ellison, Emelyn 10 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 4/1/2012 Resignation/Retire Teacher 1 . Anderson, Janet Christine effective 6/19/2012 Retirement 2 . Anderson, Stephen effective 6/20/2012 Personal 3 . Cox, Amber effective 6/20/2012 Personal Page 8 Tuesday, May 29, 2012 PERSONNEL--CLASSIFIED Curriculum/Non-Curriculum hours Catering - Rotary 1 . Ball, Loretta 10 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/14/2012 Meetings - Special Ed time and effort 1 . Walker, Pamela 24 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 12/6/2011 Tutor 1 . Erickson, Christine 20 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/1/2012 2 . Farr, Brooks 40 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/7/2012 3 . Reynolds, Alice 20 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/4/2012 New Hire Lesson coordinator/Lifeguard 1 . Blakely, Alyssa As needed @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/15/2012 Lifeguard 1 . Scott, Amy As needed @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/15/2012 Supervisory Duties Track 1 . Alexander, Laymont 30 hour(s) @ hourly rate of pay effective 5/9/2012 Page 9 May 29, 2012 Page 7 FINANCE 1. Vouchers Vouchers will be presented. Recommendation: That these vouchers be signed. 2. Request for Authorization to Surplus Buses Authorization is requested to surplus and sell, at a public sale, the following list of surplus buses. These items will be sold in accordance with existing board policy and statutes. Bus # Year Mileage Condition 93 1990 228,354 Body poor, interior poor, high mileage on engine and transmission. 94 1990 221,630 Body poor, interior poor, high mileage on engine and transmission. 95 1991 213,812 Body poor, interior poor, high mileage on engine and transmission. 96 1991 247,393 Body poor, interior poor, high mileage on engine and transmission. 97 1991 215,096 Body poor, interior poor, high mileage on transmission. 98 1991 250,453 Body poor, interior poor, high mileage on engine and transmission. 99 1991 219,300 Body very poor, interior poor, high mileage on engine and transmission. 100 1991 260,559 Body poor, interior poor, high mileage on engine and transmission. 1 1996 194,056 Body poor, interior poor, faulty roof bows, wheelchair lift worn. 2 1996 207,252 Body poor, interior poor, faulty roof bows, wheelchair lift worn. 7 1996 184,034 Body poor, interior poor, faulty roof bows, wheelchair lift worn. 12 1996 185,876 Body poor, interior poor, faulty roof bows, wheelchair lift worn. 17 1996 176,744 Body poor, interior poor, faulty roof bows, wheelchair lift worn. 18 1996 160,428 Body poor, interior poor, faulty roof bows, wheelchair lift worn. 35 1999 218,711 Body poor, interior poor, transmission slips, wheelchair lift worn. 36 1999 196,257 Body poor, interior poor, transmission is not functional, wheelchair lift worn. Recommendation: That the board authorize surplus of the above-listed school buses. May 29, 2012 Page 8 3. Financial Statements Financial statements for the month of April will be presented for the board’s information. 3apckp07.p AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 9:13 AM 05/24/12 04.12.02.00.00-010018 Check Summary PAGE: 1 The following vouchers as audited and certified by the Auditing Officer as required by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW 42.24.090, are approved for payment. Those payments have been recorded on this listing which has been made available to the board. As of May 29, 2012, the board, by a ______vote approves payments, totaling $1,093,911.92. The payments are further identified in this document. Total by Payment Type for Cash Account, US Bank of Washington: Warrant Numbers 406428 through 406666, totaling $1,093,911.92. Secretary ______Board Member ______ Board Member ______Board Member ______ Board Member ______Board Member ______ Check Nbr Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount 406428 A R SPORTS 05/29/2012 1,046.04 406429 ACP DIRECT 05/29/2012 62.45 406430 AGRISHOP INC 05/29/2012 66.55 406431 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC 05/29/2012 52.17 406432 AMERICAN RED CROSS 05/29/2012 273.00 406433 ANDYMARK INC 05/29/2012 190.91 406434 AP EXAMS AP PROGRAM 05/29/2012 23,265.00 406435 APPLE CONSULTING LLC 05/29/2012 240.00 406436 ARAMARK 05/29/2012 88.26 406437 ATLAS PEN & PENCIL CORP 05/29/2012 53.77 406438 AUBURN AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERC 05/29/2012 1,000.00 406439 AUBURN ASSN OF EDUCATIONAL 05/29/2012 185.00 406440 AUBURN ELECTRICAL SERVICE INC 05/29/2012 361.35 406441 AUBURN FALSE ALARM REDUCTION P 05/29/2012 100.00 406442 AUBURN YOUTH RESOURCES INC 05/29/2012 4,860.00 406443 BALANCE DYNAMICS INC 05/29/2012 5,236.70 406444 BARGREEN ELLINGSON INC 05/29/2012 65.15 3apckp07.p AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 9:13 AM 05/24/12 04.12.02.00.00-010018 Check Summary PAGE: 2 Check Nbr Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount 406445 BARNES & NOBLE INC 5903315 05/29/2012 374.38 406446 BATTERY SYSTEMS 05/29/2012 97.19 406447 BEHUNIN, KRYSTAL 05/29/2012 35.00 406448 BIRTH TO THREE DEVELOPMENTAL C 05/29/2012 14,532.00 406449 BLICK ART MATERIALS 05/29/2012 823.63 406450 BOWERS, SHELBY 05/29/2012 42.00 406451 BRANDSRUD, DANA 05/29/2012 42.00 406452 BRINKS INC 05/29/2012 307.03 406453 BROAD REACH BOOKS 05/29/2012 147.50 406454 BROTHERTON, JENNIFER S 05/29/2012 400.00 406455 BUCKLEY RECYCLE CENTER 05/29/2012 60.00 406456 BUILDING THE BRIDGES ORGANIZAT 05/29/2012 500.00 406457 CAREERSTAFF UNLIMITED INC 05/29/2012 12,900.00 406458 CAROLINA BIOLOGICAL SUPPLY COM 05/29/2012 391.29 406459 CARSON DELLOSA PUBLISHING CO L 05/29/2012 683.90 406460 CARTWRIGHT, JENAE 05/29/2012 42.00 406461 CASE PARTS COMPANY 05/29/2012 660.79 406462 CASTLE PARK LLC 05/29/2012 281.50 406463 CBT DIRECT LLC 05/29/2012 1,199.00 406464 CENTRAL RESTAURANT PRODUCTS 05/29/2012 1,124.64 406465 CHARLIES PRODUCE 05/29/2012 2,639.30 406466 CHENEY, BRIAN 05/29/2012 64.00 406467 CHUCKALS INC 05/29/2012 24.97 406468 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES 05/29/2012 692.26 406469 COLLINS, MARY 05/29/2012 255.30 3apckp07.p AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 9:13 AM 05/24/12 04.12.02.00.00-010018 Check Summary PAGE: 3 Check Nbr Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount 406470 CONKLIN, MEGAN 05/29/2012 400.00 406471 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST I 05/29/2012 12.87 406472 CORSALETTI, STEVEN 05/29/2012 42.00 406473 CREATIVE MATHEMATICS 05/29/2012 68.00 406474 CUMMINS NW LLC 05/29/2012 1,371.55 406475 CURRICULUM ASSOCIATES INC 05/29/2012 256.48 406476 DAIRY FRESH FARMS INC 05/29/2012 1,083.55 406477 DEPT OF LICENSING MASTER LICE 05/29/2012 658.00 406478 DESIGN AIR LTD 05/29/2012 2,672.24 406479 DONOVAN, SARAH M 05/29/2012 88.00 406480 EBS HEALTHCARE STAFFING SERVIC 05/29/2012 7,110.00 406481 EDEN ADVANCED PEST TECHNOLOGIE 05/29/2012 125.93 406482 ELECTRONIX EXPRESS 05/29/2012 281.55 406483 ERIC ARMIN INC 05/29/2012 1,046.27 406484 ESSANG-EKPO, ESSEME 05/29/2012 42.00 406485 FARMER BROTHERS CO 05/29/2012 84.40 406486 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC #3007 05/29/2012 32.26 406487 FERRELLGAS 05/29/2012 20.47 406488 FLINN SCIENTIFIC INC 05/29/2012 98.09 406489 FLOHR, KAREN 05/29/2012 42.00 406490 FOOD SERVICES OF AMERICA 05/29/2012 181,194.15 406491 GAYA, DANA 05/29/2012 82.50 406492 GOS PRINTING CORP 05/29/2012 108.53 406493 GOSNEY MOTOR PARTS INC 05/29/2012 1,884.65 406494 GREEN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE 05/29/2012 276,592.53 3apckp07.p AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 9:13 AM 05/24/12 04.12.02.00.00-010018 Check Summary PAGE: 4 Check Nbr Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount 406495 HAGGEN INC 05/29/2012 317.44 406496 HARGETT, KAREN G 05/29/2012 88.00 406497 HD FOWLER COMPANY INC 05/29/2012 76.30 406498 HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY DIVISION 05/29/2012 4,834.94 406499 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 05/29/2012 686.38 406500 HOSFORD, ANNILEE 05/29/2012 165.00 406501 HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT 05/29/2012 2,453.10 406502 IMAGE MASTERS INC 05/29/2012 101.84 406503 INTEGRATED REGISTER SYSTEM INC 05/29/2012 10,656.54 406504 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF CERTI 05/29/2012 85.00 406505 JACKSON, TIFFANY 05/29/2012 77.00 406506 JASON S KUO 05/29/2012 1,425.00 406507 JOSTENS 05/29/2012 1,497.97 406508 JW PEPPER & SON INC 05/29/2012 1,261.14 406509 KELLEY IMAGING SYSTEMS 05/29/2012 21.20 406510 KING, KALIN C 05/29/2012 952.00 406511 KING COUNTY DIRECTORS ASSN 05/29/2012 4,697.28 406512 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTI 05/29/2012 7,056.90 406513 KUDRICK, LYNDMILA 05/29/2012 77.00 406514 LEADERSHIP & LEARNING CENTER 05/29/2012 14,800.77 406515 LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER 05/29/2012 1,150.93 406516 LIDS TEAM SPORTS 05/29/2012 782.05 406517 LORENZ CORPORATION 05/29/2012 102.79 406518 MACIAS, MAX GIOVANNI 05/29/2012 20.00 406519 MASUCCIO, JENNIFER 05/29/2012 88.00 3apckp07.p AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 9:13 AM 05/24/12 04.12.02.00.00-010018 Check Summary PAGE: 5 Check Nbr Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount 406520 MCDANNEL, STEVE 05/29/2012 48.00 406521 MCINTYRE, ALLISON 05/29/2012 8.75 406522 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY CO 05/29/2012 455.74 406523 MICONTROLS INC 05/29/2012 3,017.05 406524 MICRO COMPUTER SYSTEMS INC 05/29/2012 257.81 406525 MLCS WOODWORKING 05/29/2012 471.65 406526 MOSBY BROTHERS FARMS INC 05/29/2012 751.65 406527 MUSIC CENTERS INC 05/29/2012 211.34 406528 NATIONAL SCHOOL BOARDS ASSN 05/29/2012 2,175.00 406529 OCEGUEDA, MARIA 05/29/2012 48.00 406530 OETC 05/29/2012 49.99 406531 OFFICE DEPOT INC 05/29/2012 81.62 406532 ORCA PACIFIC INC 05/29/2012 996.06 406533 PACIFIC INTERPRETERS INC 05/29/2012 514.88 406534 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION 05/29/2012 31.55 406535 PACIFIC WELDING SUPPLIES 05/29/2012 84.28 406536 PARKER PAINT MFG CO INC 05/29/2012 916.52 406537 PETRO CARD 05/29/2012 38,304.28 406538 PHILBRICK, JENNIFER M 05/29/2012 42.00 406539 PHONAK LLC 05/29/2012 1,419.99 406540 PITZL, RHONDA 05/29/2012 77.00 406541 PLATT ELECTRIC 05/29/2012 354.29 406542 POE, ALAN 05/29/2012 29.00 406543 PR MEDIA 05/29/2012 275.00 406544 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 05/29/2012 729.17 3apckp07.p AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 9:13 AM 05/24/12 04.12.02.00.00-010018 Check Summary PAGE: 6 Check Nbr Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount 406545 PROFESSIONAL TURF SOLUTIONS 05/29/2012 10,500.00 406546 PUGET SOUND ESD 05/29/2012 2,000.00 406547 PUGET SOUND ENERGY ELECTRIC 05/29/2012 3,883.29 406548 PUGET SOUND ENERGY NAT GAS 05/29/2012 26,706.66 406549 REMEDIA PUBLICATIONS INC 05/29/2012 269.96 406550 RIEL, DANA 05/29/2012 29.53 406551 RIVERA, MARCOS ALEJANDRO 05/29/2012 12.00 406552 RUTLEDGE, JAMES 05/29/2012 84.00 406553 SAFEWAY INC 05/29/2012 1,281.73 406554 SCHETKY NW SALES INC 05/29/2012 31.45 406555 SCHOOL SPECIALTY 05/29/2012 111.62 406556 SEATTLE KING CO PUBLIC HEALTH 05/29/2012 577.00 406557 SEATTLE MACK SALES INC 05/29/2012 35.04 406558 SIX ROBBLEES INC 05/29/2012 81.63 406559 SOUND BUSINESS SYSTEMS 05/29/2012 65.91 406560 SOUND ENERGY SYSTEMS 05/29/2012 359.40 406561 SPANN, CECILY 05/29/2012 163.17 406562 SPECIALTY FOREST PRODUCTS INC 05/29/2012 1,813.25 406563 SPECIALTY METALS CORPORATION 05/29/2012 212.39 406564 STANSELL GLASS INC 05/29/2012 74.46 406565 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 05/29/2012 5,759.76 406566 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 05/29/2012 430.96 406567 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE LEGIS B 05/29/2012 2,430.95 406568 STINE, ERIN 05/29/2012 42.00 406569 STONEWARE INC 05/29/2012 299.00 3apckp07.p AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 9:13 AM 05/24/12 04.12.02.00.00-010018 Check Summary PAGE: 7 Check Nbr Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount 406570 STYRO RECYCLE LLC 05/29/2012 45.00 406571 SUPERIOR FLUX & MFG CO 05/29/2012 234.50 406572 SVOBODD, SANDY 05/29/2012 42.00 406573 SWIFT TOOL COMPANY INC 05/29/2012 57.52 406574 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 05/29/2012 208.27 406575 THERMAL SUPPLY INC 05/29/2012 700.26 406576 THORNQUIST, DIANE 05/29/2012 64.00 406577 TOP ECHELON CONTRACTING INC 05/29/2012 5,851.50 406578 TOTAL FILTRATION SERVICES, INC 05/29/2012 4,567.23 406579 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 05/29/2012 416.08 406580 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 05/29/2012 120.15 406581 US TOY CO 05/29/2012 310.10 406582 VACA, JANEL 05/29/2012 40.00 406583 VERDE VALLEY SCHOOL SUPPLY 05/29/2012 4,280.00 406584 VIRCKS, CHRISTINE 05/29/2012 42.00 406585 W M SMITH & ASSOCIATES INC 05/29/2012 350.86 406586 WASH AUTOMATED INC 05/29/2012 8,004.45 406587 WASH CEDAR & SUPPLY CO 05/29/2012 26.94 406588 WASH STATE SCHOOL DIRECTORS AS 05/29/2012 385.00 406589 WASH STUDENT LEADERSHIP 05/29/2012 430.80 406590 WASH TRACTOR INC 05/29/2012 387.28 406591 WEAVING WORKS INC 05/29/2012 72.00 406592 WEST COAST PLATEN COMPANY 05/29/2012 177.48 406593 WESTERN MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS 05/29/2012 897.90 406594 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 05/29/2012 253.56 3apckp07.p AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 9:13 AM 05/24/12 04.12.02.00.00-010018 Check Summary PAGE: 8 Check Nbr Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount 406595 WHITE RIVER VALLEY MUSEUM 05/29/2012 134.00 406596 WOODWORKERS SUPPLY 05/29/2012 499.70 406597 WSIPC NW ESD FISCAL AGENT 05/29/2012 389.84 406598 YORKE, JOHN H 05/29/2012 25.00 406599 ZAMORANO, DELFINO 05/29/2012 9.00 406600 ATLED ENTERPRISES 05/29/2012 500.00 406601 C N R INC 05/29/2012 30.11 406602 DELL MARKETING LP % DELL USA L 05/29/2012 5,308.06 406603 DENALI ADVANCED INTEGRATION 05/29/2012 8,172.16 406604 FOLLETT SOFTWARE COMPANY 05/29/2012 1,513.47 406605 INSLEE BEST DOEZIE & RYDER PS 05/29/2012 1,501.50 406606 MICRO COMPUTER SYSTEMS INC 05/29/2012 39,735.44 406607 NAC ARCHITECTURE INC 05/29/2012 187,010.92 406608 NOW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC 05/29/2012 2,260.00 406609 PAASCHE CONSTRUCTION INC 05/29/2012 54,309.50 406610 SHOCKEY PLANNING GROUP INC 05/29/2012 7,287.05 406611 SOUND PUBLISHING INC 05/29/2012 873.88 406612 WELSH COMMISSIONING GROUPS INC 05/29/2012 3,080.00 406613 AUBURN FOOD BANK 05/29/2012 940.00 406614 AUBURN SCHOOL DIST 408 ** 05/29/2012 300.00 406615 AUBURN SENIOR H S 05/29/2012 98.85 406616 BLAZING BAGELS & BAKERY INC 05/29/2012 25.40 406617 CASCADE VALLEY BLENDS LLC 05/29/2012 214.24 406618 CHEFWEAR INC 05/29/2012 197.65 406619 COSTCO 05/29/2012 1,850.22 3apckp07.p AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 9:13 AM 05/24/12 04.12.02.00.00-010018 Check Summary PAGE: 9 Check Nbr Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount 406620 COSTUMES PERIOD 05/29/2012 497.25 406621 DAVIS, MELINDA 05/29/2012 6.50 406622 DECARTERET DESIGNS LLC 05/29/2012 875.00 406623 DOMINOS PIZZA-7113 05/29/2012 385.18 406624 DUGANS INCORPORATED 05/29/2012 266.71 406625 EDUCATIONAL THEATRE ASSN 05/29/2012 437.00 406626 EK BEVERAGE COMPANY 05/29/2012 834.03 406627 FOOD SERVICES OF AMERICA 05/29/2012 1,847.79 406628 GOSNEY MOTOR PARTS INC 05/29/2012 701.36 406629 GREEN RIVER MUSIC EDUCATORS AS 05/29/2012 110.00 406630 HALFON CANDY COMPANY 05/29/2012 383.86 406631 HEIDIS PROMISE 05/29/2012 250.00 406632 HESSELGRAVE SOUTH 05/29/2012 2,447.60 406633 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS BELLINGHAM 05/29/2012 2,799.50 406634 HUF ENTERPRISES 05/29/2012 100.00 406635 IMAGE MASTERS INC 05/29/2012 647.15 406636 INTEGRITY PRINT RESOURCE INC 05/29/2012 23.45 406637 KENT MERIDIAN TRACK & FIELD 05/29/2012 225.00 406638 KIMMEL ATHLETIC SUPPLY 05/29/2012 810.30 406639 KING COUNTY DIRECTORS ASSN 05/29/2012 28.14 406640 LANE, ANNETTE J 05/29/2012 100.00 406641 LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY WA 05/29/2012 2,845.82 406642 LIDS TEAM SPORTS 05/29/2012 426.33 406643 MOVIE LICENSING USA 05/29/2012 375.00 406644 NEEDLEWORKS INC 05/29/2012 767.00 3apckp07.p AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 9:13 AM 05/24/12 04.12.02.00.00-010018 Check Summary PAGE: 10 Check Nbr Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount 406645 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC 05/29/2012 426.04 406646 PACIFIC PUBLISHING COMPANY 05/29/2012 979.55 406647 RIVARS CUSTOM SHOW APPAREL 05/29/2012 125.00 406648 ROBERTSON WITMER STEEL DRUM BA 05/29/2012 850.00 406649 SCARFF FORD 05/29/2012 307.65 406650 SO KING CO SOCCER REFEREES ASN 05/29/2012 5,268.36 406651 SPORTDECALS INC 05/29/2012 540.91 406652 TAYLOR PUBLISHING COMPANY 05/29/2012 775.00 406653 TH DESIGNS 05/29/2012 4,099.00 406654 UNIVERSAL CHEERLEADING ASSOCIA 05/29/2012 1,550.00 406655 WALMART SAMS CLUB 05/29/2012 328.26 406656 WASH INTERSCHOLASTIC ACTIVITIE 05/29/2012 60.00 406657 WEST COAST AWARDS & ATHLETICS 05/29/2012 798.70 406658 WEST COAST ENTERTAINMENT 05/29/2012 650.00 406659 AUBURN MOUNTAINVIEW H S 05/29/2012 22.50 406660 AUBURN RIVERSIDE H S 05/29/2012 50.00 406661 AUBURN SCHOOL DIST CHILD NUTR* 05/29/2012 94.53 406662 AUBURN SENIOR H S 05/29/2012 490.00 406663 CASCADE M S 05/29/2012 217.81 406664 JOSTENS 05/29/2012 632.37 406665 OLYMPIC M S 05/29/2012 51.00 406666 WEST AUBURN HIGH SCHOOL 05/29/2012 230.00 239 Computer Check(s) For a Total of 1,093,911.92 3apckp07.p AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 9:13 AM 05/24/12 04.12.02.00.00-010018 Check Summary PAGE: 11 0 Manual Checks For a Total of 0.00 0 Wire Transfer Checks For a Total of 0.00 0 ACH Checks For a Total of 0.00 239 Computer Checks For a Total of 1,093,911.92 Total For 239 Manual, Wire Tran, ACH & Computer Checks 1,093,911.92 Less 0 Voided Checks For a Total of 0.00 Net Amount 1,093,911.92 F U N D S U M M A R Y Fund Description Balance Sheet Revenue Expense Total 10 General Fund 4,949.24 1,564.07 735,453.51 741,966.82 20 Capital Projects 0.00 0.00 311,582.09 311,582.09 40 ASB Fund -18.78 0.00 38,593.58 38,574.80 70 Private Purpose 0.00 0.00 1,788.21 1,788.21 3apckp07.p AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 9:32 AM 05/24/12 04.12.02.00.00-010018 Check Summary PAGE: 1 The following vouchers as audited and certified by the Auditing Officer as required by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW 42.24.090, are approved for payment. Those payments have been recorded on this listing which has been made available to the board. As of May 29, 2012, the board, by a ______vote approves payments, totaling $128,408.16. The payments are further identified in this document. Total by Payment Type for Cash Account, US Bank Wire Transfers: Wire Transfer Payments 201100488 through 201100514, totaling $128,408.16 Secretary ______Board Member ______ Board Member ______Board Member ______ Board Member ______Board Member ______ Check Nbr Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount 201100488 AT & T 05/29/2012 143.57 201100489 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES 05/29/2012 4,425.32 201100490 CEDAR GROVE ORGANICS RECYCLING 05/29/2012 1,363.07 201100491 CENTURY LINK 05/29/2012 40,169.47 201100492 CITY OF AUBURN UTILITIES 05/29/2012 37,792.93 201100493 CENTURY LINK 05/29/2012 11,060.52 201100494 CENTURY LINK BUSINESS SERVICES 05/29/2012 541.49 201100495 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/29/2012 0.89 201100496 3 WIRE GROUP INC 05/29/2012 1,480.27 201100497 BARGREEN ELLINGSON INC 05/29/2012 2,228.67 201100498 CASE PARTS COMPANY 05/29/2012 1,144.34 201100499 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST I 05/29/2012 619.24 201100500 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC #3007 05/29/2012 5,195.58 201100501 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS 05/29/2012 647.94 201100502 NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORP 05/29/2012 601.21 201100503 NORBY COMPANY 05/29/2012 854.06 201100504 WILLIAM V MACGILL & CO 05/29/2012 892.86 3apckp07.p AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 9:32 AM 05/24/12 04.12.02.00.00-010018 Check Summary PAGE: 2 Check Nbr Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount 201100505 APULENT LTD 05/29/2012 8,500.00 201100506 CLOUD 9 SPORTS/BADEN SPORTS 05/29/2012 1,824.40 201100507 COSTCO 05/29/2012 783.86 201100508 DESTINY COLLECTIVE 05/29/2012 1,574.50 201100509 PARTY OUTFITTERS INC 05/29/2012 945.00 201100510 SEI 05/29/2012 238.41 201100511 TACOMA RAINIERS BASEBALL 05/29/2012 162.00 201100512 FOLLETT LIBRARY RESOURCES 05/29/2012 461.82 201100513 SELWAY MACHINE TOOL COMPANY IN 05/29/2012 239.80 201100514 LIDS TEAM SPORTS 05/29/2012 4,516.94 27 Wire Transfer Check(s) For a Total of 128,408.16 3apckp07.p AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 9:32 AM 05/24/12 04.12.02.00.00-010018 Check Summary PAGE: 3 0 Manual Checks For a Total of 0.00 27 Wire Transfer Checks For a Total of 128,408.16 0 ACH Checks For a Total of 0.00 0 Computer Checks For a Total of 0.00 Total For 27 Manual, Wire Tran, ACH & Computer Checks 128,408.16 Less 0 Voided Checks For a Total of 0.00 Net Amount 128,408.16 F U N D S U M M A R Y Fund Description Balance Sheet Revenue Expense Total 10 General Fund 481.11 0.00 109,381.94 109,863.05 40 ASB Fund 0.00 0.00 18,545.11 18,545.11 3apckp07.p AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 9:40 AM 05/24/12 04.12.02.00.00-010018 Check Summary PAGE: 1 The following vouchers as audited and certified by the Auditing Officer as required by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW 42.24.090, are approved for payment. Those payments have been recorded on this listing which has been made available to the board. As of May 29, 2012, the board, by a ______vote approves payments, totaling $79,754.19. The payments are further identified in this document. Total by Payment Type for Cash Account, AP Direct Dep Settlement Accou: ACH Numbers 111201942 through 111202053, totaling $79,754.19 Secretary ______Board Member ______ Board Member ______Board Member ______ Board Member ______Board Member ______ Check Nbr Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount 111201942 AMADO, SONIA 05/29/2012 3.05 111201943 ANDERSON, JANET CHRISTINE 05/29/2012 200.00 111201944 ARRIGONI, TODD J 05/29/2012 37.19 111201945 AUBERT, DOUGLAS JAMES 05/29/2012 125.00 111201946 AUBURN SCHOOL DIST REVOLVING F 05/29/2012 1,041.98 111201947 BAH, EMILY ANNE 05/29/2012 18.55 111201948 BARKER, CAROL JEAN 05/29/2012 334.40 111201949 BLOSSER, REBEKAH LYNN 05/29/2012 28.86 111201950 BOWLER, DONNA LOU VON 05/29/2012 195.00 111201951 BROWN, GREGORY S 05/29/2012 28.97 111201952 BURT, TIFFANY ANN 05/29/2012 60.53 111201953 CAMPBELL, LORIE L 05/29/2012 200.00 111201954 CHOCK, RUBY WAI CHING 05/29/2012 200.00 111201955 CHRISTIANSEN, STEPHEN L 05/29/2012 51.84 111201956 DANIEL, ERIC STUART 05/29/2012 77.66 111201957 DEBRULER, ADAM DALE 05/29/2012 10.77 111201958 DEGROOT, KAREN MARIE 05/29/2012 200.00 3apckp07.p AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 9:40 AM 05/24/12 04.12.02.00.00-010018 Check Summary PAGE: 2 Check Nbr Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount 111201959 DETWILER, KIMBERLY FLINT 05/29/2012 59.00 111201960 DUPUY, ANDREA 05/29/2012 16.21 111201961 EKSTROM, CORY ALAN 05/29/2012 200.00 111201962 ERICKSON, SEASAN 05/29/2012 200.00 111201963 ES SPEECH & LANGUAGE SERVICES 05/29/2012 2,137.50 111201964 FAWVER, RICHARD ALLEN 05/29/2012 59.05 111201965 FOSTER, RYAN BRENT 05/29/2012 25.52 111201966 FRICKS, RONALD E 05/29/2012 96.20 111201967 GALATI, ELIZABETH ANN 05/29/2012 200.00 111201968 GIBSON-MYERS, ELIZABETH ANN 05/29/2012 219.37 111201969 GILDEN, JAN B 05/29/2012 298.98 111201970 GODFREY, DEAN Y 05/29/2012 200.00 111201971 HAGEDORN, BARBARA BEANE 05/29/2012 56.25 111201972 HOLBROOK, DEANNA LYNN 05/29/2012 200.00 111201973 HUFT, JOY JOANN 05/29/2012 39.01 111201974 JACOBS, LORI DAWN 05/29/2012 141.66 111201975 JEFFREYS, BRENDAN THOMAS 05/29/2012 200.00 111201976 JOHNSON, BETH E 05/29/2012 200.00 111201977 JORDAN, GARY D 05/29/2012 120.66 111201978 JUNELL, KATARINA ANNA 05/29/2012 24.98 111201979 KELLER, BRIAN M 05/29/2012 49.24 111201980 KIM, MIRA 05/29/2012 16.43 111201981 LAMB, PETER MACRAE 05/29/2012 35.00 111201982 LEIGHTON, DEBBIE LYN 05/29/2012 198.27 111201983 LEYDA, BRENDA M 05/29/2012 419.00 3apckp07.p AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 9:40 AM 05/24/12 04.12.02.00.00-010018 Check Summary PAGE: 3 Check Nbr Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount 111201984 LOUIE, ALISA LYNN 05/29/2012 200.00 111201985 LUSCHEI, MARY ANNE 05/29/2012 200.00 111201986 MADIGAN, JOHN A 05/29/2012 153.18 111201987 MALONE, CORIN G 05/29/2012 231.90 111201988 MAST, BRADEN WARREN 05/29/2012 12.60 111201989 MATSUNO, MAKI 05/29/2012 338.99 111201990 MATTOX, TIFFANY SUZANNE 05/29/2012 200.00 111201991 MCCAUSLAND, ANGELA KARON 05/29/2012 75.18 111201992 MCDONALD, PAMELA KAY 05/29/2012 80.00 111201993 MELIUS, KIMBERLY 05/29/2012 230.88 111201994 MILKS, JENNIFER LYNN 05/29/2012 213.12 111201995 MILLARD, DENNIS B 05/29/2012 790.00 111201996 MITCHELL, TERESA DAWN 05/29/2012 33.00 111201997 NEWMAN, MICHAEL V 05/29/2012 49.60 111201998 O'DELL, GORDON DUANE 05/29/2012 56.77 111201999 OKE, JANET K 05/29/2012 200.00 111202000 OTTELE, KELLY E 05/29/2012 200.00 111202001 PARKS, PAMELA G 05/29/2012 50.00 111202002 PARSONS, KRISTA ROSLYN 05/29/2012 163.17 111202003 PETRIE, DELLA J 05/29/2012 20.92 111202004 PRAIN, GREGORY M 05/29/2012 200.00 111202005 RAMIREZ-DILLARD, REBECCA A 05/29/2012 210.00 111202006 REIFERT, VICKI JEAN 05/29/2012 7.77 111202007 RICHSTAD, KEVIN K 05/29/2012 200.00 111202008 RITTER, ROBIN 05/29/2012 11.54 3apckp07.p AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 9:40 AM 05/24/12 04.12.02.00.00-010018 Check Summary PAGE: 4 Check Nbr Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount 111202009 ROBAYO WHITE, MARTHA C 05/29/2012 240.00 111202010 SAXON, JAN K 05/29/2012 61.55 111202011 SCHEER, MELISSA DAWN 05/29/2012 200.00 111202012 SCOTT, TIMOTHY MELVIN 05/29/2012 154.57 111202013 SHU-MINUTOLI, KAREN 05/29/2012 15.54 111202014 SISON, LAURIE 05/29/2012 71.41 111202015 SLEETH, AMY JO 05/29/2012 74.05 111202016 STRAND, DEBRA MARIE 05/29/2012 16.39 111202017 SURBER, MARIBETH 05/29/2012 200.00 111202018 THOMAS, JULIA NICOLE 05/29/2012 200.00 111202019 THOMSEN, CHRISTINA WEIST 05/29/2012 210.00 111202020 TOY, DIXIE L 05/29/2012 79.45 111202021 TURNER, MEGAN DENISE 05/29/2012 31.52 111202022 US BANK CORP PAYMENT SYSTEMS P 05/29/2012 17,468.68 111202023 US BANK CORP PAYMENT SYSTEM TR 05/29/2012 2,762.26 111202024 VIEN, NEIL A 05/29/2012 59.39 111202025 WEIDE, SCOTT ELWYN 05/29/2012 26.05 111202026 WHALEN, RHONDA LYNN 05/29/2012 200.00 111202027 WHARTON, MELINDA ANN 05/29/2012 200.00 111202028 WICKSTROM, ERIN L 05/29/2012 77.00 111202029 WILCOX, CHERYL ANN 05/29/2012 500.00 111202030 WRIGHT, DORETTA ROSE 05/29/2012 233.13 111202031 ZALDIVAR, MELISA K 05/29/2012 175.34 111202032 ZAWISLAK, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD 05/29/2012 41.57 111202033 BURTON, CONNIE L 05/29/2012 39.15 3apckp07.p AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 9:40 AM 05/24/12 04.12.02.00.00-010018 Check Summary PAGE: 5 Check Nbr Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount 111202034 ABRAHAM, DIANE KAY 05/29/2012 27.32 111202035 AUBURN RIVERSIDE HIGH SCHOOL I 05/29/2012 2,284.31 111202036 AUBURN SCHOOL DIST REVOLVING F 05/29/2012 1,775.13 111202037 AUBURN SENIOR HIGH IMPREST 05/29/2012 4,409.95 111202038 BURKHALTER, ARLEEN JEAN 05/29/2012 59.48 111202039 DECKER, MICHAEL EDWARD 05/29/2012 316.03 111202040 DEVRIES, DALE A 05/29/2012 385.49 111202041 KING, MATTHEW L 05/29/2012 81.15 111202042 LOCKE, ROBERTA JEAN 05/29/2012 122.66 111202043 MAY, JONNA G 05/29/2012 211.60 111202044 MORRISON, CRYSTAL A 05/29/2012 48.50 111202045 PAYNE, STEVEN JAMES 05/29/2012 720.24 111202046 PIZZA TIME 05/29/2012 3,738.71 111202047 ROWE, ALESHA MARIE 05/29/2012 40.22 111202048 SLATER, ROBIN SHANTELLE 05/29/2012 19.25 111202049 THOMAS, JULIA NICOLE 05/29/2012 38.93 111202050 US BANK CORP PAYMENT SYSTEMS P 05/29/2012 16,072.36 111202051 US BANK CORP PAYMENT SYSTEM TR 05/29/2012 13,505.19 111202052 THOMAS, JULIA NICOLE 05/29/2012 47.24 111202053 US BANK CORP PAYMENT SYSTEMS P 05/29/2012 158.63 112 ACH Check(s) For a Total of 79,754.19 3apckp07.p AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 9:40 AM 05/24/12 04.12.02.00.00-010018 Check Summary PAGE: 6 0 Manual Checks For a Total of 0.00 0 Wire Transfer Checks For a Total of 0.00 112 ACH Checks For a Total of 79,754.19 0 Computer Checks For a Total of 0.00 Total For 112 Manual, Wire Tran, ACH & Computer Checks 79,754.19 Less 0 Voided Checks For a Total of 0.00 Net Amount 79,754.19 F U N D S U M M A R Y Fund Description Balance Sheet Revenue Expense Total 10 General Fund 780.68 112.00 34,759.97 35,652.65 20 Capital Projects 0.00 0.00 39.15 39.15 40 ASB Fund 1,317.08 0.00 42,539.44 43,856.52 70 Private Purpose 0.00 0.00 205.87 205.87 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR APRIL , 2012 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Combined Balance Sheet A. Governmental Funds B. Trust Funds and Account Groups II. Budget Status Reports A. General Fund B. Transportation Vehicle Fund C. Capital Projects Fund D. Debt Service Fund E. ASB Fund 1. High Schools 2. Middle Schools III. Private Purpose Trust Fund Statement IV. NBN Employee Benefits Trust Fund Statement V. Local Grants AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 BALANCE SHEETS - GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS APRIL 30, 2012 TRANSPORT CAPITAL DEBT GENERAL VEHICLE PROJECTS SERVICE ASB ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents 16,007,242 1,619,782 26,044,453 4,134,453 1,678,577 Restricted Cash 50,821 6,231 218,525 68,052 9,892 Property taxes receivable 19,903,070 1,898 7,696,116 5,314,060 Accounts receivable 448,352 Interest receivable 4,333 707 10,017 694 721 Due from other funds 49,213 Due from other governments 19,349 14,458 Inventory of supplies 348,598 Total Assets 36,830,978 1,628,618 33,983,569 9,517,259 1,689,190 LIABILITIES and EQUITY Liabilities: Accounts payable 1,214,009 209 2,511 Estimated Unemployment Payable 242,471 Due to other governments 26,777 3,265 114,530 35,815 5,207 Due to other funds 5,883 43,330 Deferred revenue 19,903,070 1,898 7,701,173 5,314,060 Total Liabilities 21,386,327 5,163 7,821,795 5,349,875 51,048 Equity: Non Spendable Fund Bal--Inven 834,064 Restricted for Carryovers 406,120 Restricted from Levy Proceeds 13,373,638 Assigned to Contingencies 300,000 Assigned to Other Purposes 1,800,000 Assigned To Fund Purposes 1,623,455 12,788,136 4,167,384 1,638,142 Unassigned Fund Balance 12,104,467 Total Equity 15,444,651 1,623,455 26,161,774 4,167,384 1,638,142 Total Liabilities and Equity 36,830,978 1,628,618 33,983,569 9,517,259 1,689,190 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 BALANCE SHEETS - TRUST FUNDS AND ACCOUNT GROUPS APRIL 30, 2012 TRUST FUNDS ACCOUNT GROUPS PRIV PURP NBN EMPLOY GENERAL GENERAL TRUST BENEFITS FIXED ASSETS LONG-TERM DEBT ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents 614,813 114,790 Restricted Cash 4,766 1,395 Due from Other Funds Accounts receivable 4,905 Interest receivable 268 46 Fixed assets 322,457,665 Other debits: Amount available in Debt Service Fund 4,167,384 Amount to be provided for retirement of general long-term obligations 86,621,802 Total Assets 624,752 116,231 322,457,665 90,789,186 LIABILITIES and EQUITY Liabilities: Accounts Payable 6,361 Compensated absences payable 2,449,186 Due to other governments 2,500 732 General obligation bonds payable 88,340,000 Total Liabilities 2,500 7,093 0 90,789,186 Equity: Investment in general fixed assets 322,457,665 Fund balances: Assigned To Fund Purposes 622,252 109,138 Total Equity 622,252 109,138 322,457,665 0 Total Liabilities and Equity 624,752 116,231 322,457,665 90,789,186 Auburn School District No. 408 General Fund Budget Status Summary REVENUE EXPENDITURES FUND BALANCE Fiscal Year Average Actual Actual Average Actual Monthly Beginning 2011-12 Cum % Cum % Monthly Cum % Cum %** Amount 11,392,795 September 6.89% 6.43% 8,740,233 11.31% 11.83% 10,582,228 9,550,799 October 19.18% 20.72% 19,421,444 19.79% 19.67% 11,656,101 17,316,142 November 26.62% 27.63% 9,389,780 27.09% 27.11% 11,309,805 15,396,117 December 34.14% 34.62% 9,491,855 34.53% 34.84% 11,288,455 13,599,518 January 41.61% 41.22% 8,970,667 42.24% 42.49% 11,245,611 11,324,574 February 49.19% 48.10% 9,299,550 49.92% 49.97% 11,248,476 9,375,648 March 56.93% 55.48% 10,077,486 57.68% 57.48% 11,328,341 8,124,793 April 70.31% 69.73% 19,369,054 66.23% 65.44% 12,049,196 15,444,651 May 78.44% 73.92% June 83.89% 81.49% July 91.42% 89.41% August 99.94% 96.82% Revenue Expenditure Fund Balance Anticipated - First Budget 135,890,337 142,565,696 3,530,281 REVENUE EXPENDITURES FUND BALANCE Fiscal Year Average Actual Actual Average Actual Monthly Beginning 2010-11 Cum % Cum % Monthly Cum % Cum %** Amount 10,908,255 September 6.98% 6.38% 8,804,575 11.40% 11.39% 10,431,521 9,281,309 October 19.06% 19.40% 17,941,765 19.88% 19.18% 11,561,822 15,661,252 November 26.73% 26.59% 9,948,992 27.18% 26.60% 11,270,063 14,340,180 December 34.01% 35.84% 12,760,684 34.61% 34.14% 10,888,967 16,211,897 January 41.54% 42.42% 9,087,371 42.28% 42.10% 11,069,170 14,230,099 February 49.25% 48.90% 8,949,646 50.13% 49.33% 11,391,935 11,787,809 March 57.11% 55.66% 9,317,554 57.79% 56.61% 11,384,179 9,721,184 April 70.22% 70.42% 20,371,541 66.36% 64.28% 11,418,693 18,674,032 May 78.66% 77.10% 9,225,647 74.06% 71.65% 10,622,601 17,277,078 June 84.11% 82.30% 7,168,709 81.65% 79.33% 11,629,690 12,816,097 July 91.68% 89.56% 10,027,581 89.65% 86.81% 11,445,107 11,398,571 August 100.20% 97.99% 11,636,866 97.10% 94.18% 11,642,643 11,392,795 Revenue Expenditure Fund Balance Anticipated - First Budget 138,011,573 143,088,790 4,292,872 Actual - At Fiscal Year End 135,240,931 134,756,391 11,392,795 ** Includes encumbrances. AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 GENERAL FUND 2011-12 Revenue Expenditure Fund Balance $25,000,000 Sep $8,740,233 $10,582,228 $9,550,799 Oct $19,421,444 $11,656,101 $17,316,142 Nov$20,000,000 $9,389,780 $11,309,805 $15,396,117 Dec $9,491,855 $11,288,455 $13,599,518 Jan$15,000,000 $8,970,667 $11,245,611 $11,324,574 Feb $9,299,550 $11,248,476 $9,375,648 Revenue Mar $10,077,486 $11,328,341 $8,124,793 $10,000,000 Expenditure Apr $19,369,054 $12,049,196 $15,444,651 May Jun$5,000,000 Jul Aug $0 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 2010-11 $25,000,000 2010-2011 Revenue Expenditure Fund Balance Sep $8,804,575 $10,431,521 $9,281,309 $20,000,000 Oct $17,941,765 $11,561,822 $15,661,252 Nov $9,948,992 $11,270,063 $14,340,180 Dec$15,000,000$12,760,684 $10,888,967 $16,211,897 Jan $9,087,371 $11,069,170 $14,230,099 Revenue Feb $8,949,646 $11,391,935 $11,787,809 Expenditure $10,000,000 Mar $9,317,554 $11,384,179 $9,721,184 Apr $20,371,541 $11,418,693 $18,674,032 May$5,000,000$9,225,647 $10,622,601 $17,277,078 Jun $7,168,709 $11,629,690 $12,816,097 Jul $0$10,027,581 $11,445,107 $11,398,571 Aug $11,636,866Sep Oct Nov$11,642,643 Dec Jan Feb $11,392,795Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 2009-10 Revenue Expenditure Fund Balance Sep$20,000,000 $8,770,262 $9,741,272 $7,740,213 Oct$18,000,000$17,488,391 $11,056,051 $14,172,553 Nov$16,000,000 $9,284,704 $10,753,416 $12,703,840 Dec$14,000,000 $9,951,307 $11,129,440 $11,525,707 Jan$12,000,000$10,344,407 $10,828,303 $11,041,811 Revenue Feb$10,000,000 $9,421,335 $11,114,560 $9,348,586 Expenditure Mar$8,000,000$10,174,134 $10,960,166 $8,562,554 Apr$6,000,000$18,758,205 $11,366,809 $15,953,950 May$4,000,000$10,386,423 $11,293,287 $15,047,086 Jun$2,000,000 $7,867,193 $11,252,178 $11,662,101 Jul $0$10,421,085 $11,349,675 $10,733,511 Aug $11,829,383Sep Oct Nov$11,654,639 Dec Jan Feb Mar$10,908,255 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Auburn School District No. 408 General Fund Budget Status For the Month of April, 2012 Annual Actual Total Budget For Month For Year Encumbrance Balance Percent TOTAL BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 10,205,640 11,392,795 REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 1000 Local Taxes 29,483,879 9,240,459 24,073,010 5,410,869 81.65% 2000 Local Non-Tax 4,981,996 314,762 2,660,437 2,321,559 53.40% 3000 State, General Purpose 73,404,042 7,280,672 49,995,672 23,408,370 68.11% 4000 State, Special Purpose 15,104,746 1,326,662 10,004,412 5,100,334 66.23% 5000 Federal, General Purpose 146,916 1 121,433 25,483 82.65% 6000 Federal, Special Purpose 11,817,653 1,206,085 7,526,135 4,291,518 63.69% 7000 Revenues from Other District 848,405 - 364,933 483,472 43.01% 8000 Revenues from Other Agencies 102,700 - 4,200 98,500 4.09% 9000 Other Financing Sources - 413 9,837 (9,837) Total Revenues & Other Finance Sources 135,890,337 19,369,054 94,760,069 - 41,130,268 69.73% EXPENDITURES 00 Regular Instruction 80,183,099 6,412,336 52,082,897 23,669,041 4,431,161 94.47% 10 Federal Stimulus 4,300 45,555 45,555 - (41,255) 20 Special Ed Instruction 16,570,810 1,503,403 11,053,018 5,139,018 378,774 97.71% 30 Vocational Instruction 6,248,536 479,647 3,571,875 1,822,981 853,680 86.34% 50&60 Compensatory Education 7,776,564 659,748 4,721,676 2,115,252 939,636 87.92% 70 Other Instructional Pgms 1,842,002 85,053 605,217 147,244 1,089,541 40.85% 80 Community Services 1,134,470 69,278 460,272 143,426 530,772 53.21% 90 Community Services 28,805,915 2,794,176 18,167,703 6,233,580 4,404,632 84.71% Total Expenditures 142,565,696 12,049,196 90,708,213 39,270,542 12,586,941 91.17% Excess Revenues/Other Financing Sources Over (under) Expend & Oth Financing Uses (6,675,359) 7,319,858 4,051,856 Total Ending Fund Balance $ 3,530,281 15,444,651 Ending Fund Balance Accounts GL 821 Restricted for Carryovers 750,000 406,120 GL 840 Nonspendable Fund Bal - Inv 750,000 834,064 GL 875 Unrsrvd Dsgntd-Conting 1,300,000 300,000 GL 888 Assigned to Other Purposes 600,000 1,800,000 GL 890 UnRsrvd Undsgntd Fnd Bal 130,281 12,104,467 Total Ending Fund Balance $ 3,530,281 $ 15,444,651 Auburn School District No. 408 Transportation Vehicle Fund Budget Status For the Month of April, 2012 Annual Actual Total Budget For Month For Year Encumb Balance Percent TOTAL BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 940,716 $ 946,951 REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 1000 Local Taxes 38 81 81 0.00% 2000 Local Non-Tax 5,736 674 5,331 - (405) 92.94% 3000 State, General Purpose - - - - 0.00% 4000 State, Special Purpose 520,000 - 671,092 - 151,092 129.06% 5000 Federal, General Purpose - - - - - 0.00% 8000 Revenues from Other Agencies - - - - - 0.00% 9000 Others Financing Sources ------ Total Revenues & Other Financing Sources 525,736 712 676,504 - 150,768 128.68% EXPENDITURES Type 30 Equipment 1,465,000 - - - 1,465,000 0.00% Total Expenditures 1,465,000 - - - 1,465,000 0.00% Excess Revenues/Other Financing Sources Over (under) Expend & Oth Financing Uses (939,264) 712 676,504 Total Ending Fund Balance $ 1,452 $ 1,623,455 Ending Fund Balance Accounts GL 889 Assigned to Special Fund Purposes 1,452 - 1,623,455 GL 890 UnRsrvd Undsgntd Fnd Bal - Total Ending Fund Balance $ 1,452 $ 1,623,455 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Projects Fund Budget Status For the Month of April , 2012 Annual Actual Total Budget For Month For Year Encumbrance Balance Percent TOTAL BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 23,284,583 $ 21,021,279 REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 1000 Local Taxes 12,633,674 3,567,109 10,468,902 2,164,772 82.87% 2000 Local Non-Tax 682,991 163,915 863,224 (180,233) 126.39% 3000 State, General Purpose - - - 0.00% 4000 State, Special Purpose 1,300,000 - 1,300,000 - 100.00% 5000 Federal, General Purpose - - - - 0.00% 6000 Federal, Special Purpose - - - 0.00% 7000 Revenues from Other District - - - - 0.00% 8000 Revenues from Other Agencies - - - 0.00% 9000 Other Financing Sources - - - 0.00% Total Revenues & Other Financing Sources 14,616,665 3,731,024 12,632,126 - 1,984,539 86.42% EXPENDITURES 10 Sites 3,000,000 - 346,339 - 2,653,661 11.54% 20 Buildings 14,337,860 118,272 3,705,353 3,034,912 7,597,595 47.01% 30 Equipment 2,001,950 137,767 727,608 220,550 1,053,792 47.36% 40 Energy 4,710,190 22,056 2,712,331 771,180 1,226,679 73.96% 50 Sales & Lease Expenditures - - - - - 0.00% 60 Bond Issuance Expenditures - - - - - 0.00% 90 Debt - - - - - 0.00% Total Expenditures 24,050,000 278,095 7,491,631 4,026,642 12,531,727 47.89% Excess Revenues/Other Financing Sources Over (under) Expend. & Oth Financing Uses (9,433,335) 3,452,929 5,140,495 Total Ending Fund Balance $ 13,851,248 $ 26,161,773 Ending Fund Balance Accounts GL861 Restricted from Bond Proceeds - GL 862 Restricted from Levy Proceeds 13,373,638 GL 865 Restricted from Other Proceeds 13,851,248 - GL 889 Assigned to Fund Purpose 12,788,136 GL 890 UnRsrvd Undsgntd Fnd Bal - - Total Ending Fund Balance $ 13,851,248 $ 26,161,774 Auburn School District No. 408 Debt Service Fund Budget Status For the Month of April, 2012 Annual Actual Total Budget For Month Year Encumbrance Balance Percent TOTAL BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 2,248,202 $ 2,075,963 REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 1000 Local Taxes 7,927,201 2,442,940 6,486,309 1,440,892 81.82% 2000 Local Non-Tax 13,637 737 7,603 6,034 55.75% 3000 State, General Purpose - - - - 0.00% 5000 Federal, General Purpose - - - - 0.00% 6000 Federal, Special Purpose - - - - 0.00% 9000 Other Financing Sources - - - - 0.00% Total Revenues & Other Financing Sources 7,940,838 2,443,677 6,493,912 1,446,926 81.78% EXPENDITURES Matured Bond Expenditures 4,125,000 - 2,330,000 1,795,000 56.48% Interest on Bonds 4,103,444 - 2,070,978 2,032,466 50.47% Interfund Loan Interest - - - 0.00% Bond Transfer Fees 4,500 - 1,512 2,988 33.60% Arbitrage Rebate - - - - 0.00% Underwriter's fees - - - - 0.00% Total Expenditures 8,232,944 - 4,402,490 - 3,830,454 53.47% Other Financing Uses - Excess Revenues/Other Financing Sources Over (under) Expend. & Oth Financing Uses (292,106) 2,443,677 2,091,422 Total Ending Fund Balance $ 1,956,096 $ 4,167,384 Ending Fund Balance Accounts GL 810 Reserved For Other Items - - GL 830 Reserved For Debt Service - - GL 889 Assigned to Fund Purposes 1,956,096 4,167,384 GL 890 UnRsrvd Undsgntd Fnd Bal - - Total Ending Fund Balance $ 1,956,096 $ 4,167,384 Auburn School District No. 408 ASB Fund Budget Status For the Month of April, 2012 Annual Actual Budget For Month Total for Year Encumb Balance Percent TOTAL BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $ 948,856 $ 1,369,623 REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 1000 General Student Body 1,641,205 40,199 567,976 1,073,229 34.61% 2000 Athletics 202,200 5,350 170,791 31,409 84.47% 3000 Classes 301,070 16,014 94,981 206,089 31.55% 4000 Clubs 1,841,598 68,471 852,107 989,491 46.27% 6000 Private Moneys 96,660 2,099 46,489 50,171 48.10% Total Revenues & Other Financing S 4,082,733 132,133 1,732,344 - 2,350,389 42.43% EXPENDITURES 1000 General Student Body 1,287,013 58,166 359,391 8,086 919,536 28.55% 2000 Athletics 324,827 19,515 206,787 13,808 104,232 67.91% 3000 Classes 341,950 11,374 60,361 - 281,589 17.65% 4000 Clubs 1,965,947 120,522 817,412 123,816 1,024,719 47.88% 6000 Private Moneys 106,647 1,042 19,874 - 86,773 18.64% - Total Expenditures 4,026,384 210,619 1,463,825 145,710 2,416,849 39.97% Excess Revenues/Other Financing Sources Over (under) Expend. & Oth Financi 56,349 (78,486) 268,519 Total Ending Fund Balance $ 1,005,205 $ 1,638,142 Ending Fund Balance Accounts GL 889 Assigned to Fund Purposes 1,005,205 1,638,142 Total Ending Fund Balance $ 1,005,205 $ 1,638,142 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 ASB FUND APRIL , 2012 HIGH SCHOOLS Auburn Auburn Auburn High Mountainview Riverside West Auburn TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCE $ 249,672.74 $ 250,867.15 $ 392,647.53 $ 13,324.29 $ 906,511.71 REVENUES $ 446,645.71 $ 435,512.67 $ 436,049.63 $ 1,249.11 $ 1,319,457.12 EXPENDITURES General $ 34,839.27 $ 108,377.19 $ 83,348.27 $ 733.41 $ 227,298.14 Athletics 80,206.30 38,125.48 68,521.02 - 186,852.80 Classes 7,144.37 29,427.28 9,827.20 - 46,398.85 Clubs 269,034.97 221,403.05 226,374.13 1,495.39 718,307.54 Private Monies 4,633.82 1,273.42 7,334.22 384.37 13,625.83 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 395,858.73 $ 398,606.42 $ 395,404.84 $ 2,613.17 $ 1,192,483.16 TRANSFERS General $ 49,971.09 $ 37,285.98 $ 50,456.58 $ 200.00 $ 137,913.65 Athletics (7,740.72) (14,920.13) (26,925.50) - (49,586.35) Classes 62.90 (48.95) 1,296.96 (200.00) 1,110.91 Clubs (42,293.27) (23,496.88) (24,828.04) - (90,618.19) Private Monies - 1,179.98 - - 1,179.98 TOTAL TRANSFERS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 0.00 OVER/ (UNDER) $ 50,786.98 $ 36,906.25 $ 40,644.79 $ (1,364.06) $ 126,973.96 ENDING BALANCE $ 300,459.72 $ 287,773.40 $ 433,292.32 $ 11,960.23 $ 1,033,485.67 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 408 ASB FUND APRIL, 2012 MIDDLE SCHOOLS Cascade Mt. Baker Rainier Olympic TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCE $ 69,123.93 $ 39,974.63 $ 73,823.60 $ 81,937.48 $ 264,859.64 REVENUES $ 51,279.07 $ 58,994.11 $ 79,346.89 $ 57,472.30 $ 247,092.37 EXPENDITURES General $ 22,361.72 $ 9,715.12 $ 10,242.10 $ 18,584.31 $ 60,903.25 Athletics 2,722.77 2,717.07 3,438.45 11,056.04 19,934.33 Classes - 1,649.72 1,922.99 643.19 4,215.90 Clubs 16,824.13 22,870.76 41,687.56 11,821.53 93,203.98 Private Monies 2,454.72 958.94 225.43 406.48 4,045.57 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 44,363.34 $ 37,911.61 $ 57,516.53 $ 42,511.55 $ 182,303.03 TRANSFERS General $ 12,605.73 $ 16,858.42 $ 10,932.12 $ 10,597.00 $ 50,993.27 Athletics (7,000.00) (7,468.38) (7,200.00) (7,635.00) (29,303.38) Classes (500.00) (2,791.99) (2,000.00) (1,000.00) (6,291.99) Clubs (5,105.73) (6,598.05) (1,732.12) (1,962.00) (15,397.90) Private Monies - - TOTAL TRANSFERS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ (0.00) OVER/ (UNDER) $ 6,915.73 $ 21,082.50 $ 21,830.36 $ 14,960.75 $ 64,789.34 ENDING BALANCE $ 76,039.66 $ 61,057.13 $ 95,653.96 $ 96,898.23 $ 329,648.98 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 PRIVATE PURPOSE TRUST FUND STATEMENT APRIL 30, 2012 REVENUES: InvestED $ 17,269 Scholarship Donations: 6079 AHS Alumni $ 50 7005 AHS Booster 3,950 6107 AHS Hanan 500 6099 AMHS Cheer 2,000 6100 AMHS Drama 3,100 6038 ARHS Masonic 500 7004 ARHS Win Wishes 2,102 6016 Auburn Community Scholarship 6,385 6084 Bonnie Olson 100 6003 Daan Ansingh 1,000 6076 Hirose Memorial 100 6083 Juan Huseby 4,000 6009 Judy Johnston 500 6078 Kathy Hoefert 500 6103 Linda Cowan 100 7006 Native Am Student 20,000 6007 Pat Kuhlman 1,200 7003 Pioneer Shoe Fund 800 6088 Volney Wolters Memorial 1,712 6075 Wanda Hertlein 150 6089 Watt Memorial 300 Total Scholarship Donations 49,049 Interest 2,080 Total Revenues 68,398 EXPENDITURES: InvestED 13,540 6202 ARHS Booster 500 7004 ARHS Win Wishes 1,407 7001 Brillault Book Fund 2,670 7006 Native Am Student 854 7003 Pioneer Shoe Fund 501 6024 Rotary 1,100 6026 Trapper 1,000 6025 WAHS Wiley 500 Total Expenditures 22,072 Excess of Revenue over (under) Expenditure 46,326 Fund Balance - Beginning of the Year 575,926 Fund Balance - Year to Date $ 622,252 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 408 NBN Employee Benefits Trust Fund Statement April 30, 2012 ADDITIONS: Contributions from Plan Members $ 103,421.46 Investment Earnings 375.16 Total Additions 103,796.62 DEDUCTIONS: Benefits Claims 125,102.23 State Program Fees 350.00 Total Deductions 125,452.23 NET DEDUCTIONS (21,655.61) Net Assets at Beginning of Year 130,794.11 Net Assets Year To Date $ 109,138.50 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 Local Grants Received in April, 2012 Donor Recipient Amount Callie McCarthy Lakeland $38.00 Coca Cola Alpac $10.45 Life Touch Evergreen $675.00 McDonalds Lakeland $200.72 Michelle Woolery Lakeland $100.00 PTA Annex $250.00 PTA Lake View $2,825.00 PTA Lakeland $7,096.32 PTA Mt Baker $500.00 Recycle America Hazelwood $44.07 Susan Schuman Lakeland $8.00 USAGAIN Evergreen $41.46 USAGAIN Terminal Park $16.78 USAGAIN Hazelwood $50.00 USAGAIN Rainier $50.00 UW/Tacoma Gildo Rey $1,220.00 Woolery/McCarthy Lakeland $230.00 Total $13,355.80 May 29, 2012 Page 9 DIRECTORS 1. Approval of Minutes The minutes of the regular meeting of Monday, May 14, have been forwarded to the board. Recommendation: That the minutes be approved. 2. Project Lighthouse Workshop It is being recommended that the board hold a workshop for the Project Lighthouse on Monday, June 18, 5:30 p.m. in the board room of the James P. Fugate Administration Building. Recommendation: That the school board hold a board workshop for the Project Lighthouse on Monday, June 18, 5:30 p.m. 3. Resolution No. 1155—Graduation Requirements Extension Rodney Luke will introduce Gordon O’Dell, executive director of student services, who will present board Resolution No. 1155-Graduation Requirements Extension requesting a delay in the implementation of the State Board of Education three-credit social studies requirement for high school graduation. Recommendation: That the board approve Resolution No. 1155—Graduation Requirements Extension. 4. Resolution No. 1156—Adopting the 2012-18 Capital Facilities Plan Resolution No. 1156 adopts the 2012 through 2018 Capital Facilities Plan. The plan establishes the anticipated capital construction program required to meet the projected pupil enrollment for the next six years. In addition, it computes the anticipated school impact fees under the King County model. The plan will be presented to King County and the Cities of Auburn, Algona, Black Diamond, Kent and Pacific. Michael Newman, deputy superintendent, will be present to review and discuss the plan. The plan has been reviewed by Ms. Denise Stiffarm of K&L Gates that serve as counsel for the district regarding school impact fees. Recommendation: That the board adopt Resolution No. 1156. 5. Discussion 6. Executive Session AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 1155 GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS EXTENSION WHEREAS, it is recommended by the district’s on-time graduation committee that the Board of Directors submit a resolution to the Washington State Board of Education delaying the implementation of a three-credit graduation requirement for social studies; and WHEREAS, currently the Auburn School District requires 2.5 credit in social studies and based on data from the graduating class of 2011, implementation of the new 3.0 credit requirement would require our high schools to close a minimum of 20 sections of electives and add 4.0 FTE social studies staff and potentially impact course scope and sequence in social studies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Board of Directors of the Auburn School District No. 408 hereby request, based on the extension, the 3.0 social studies requirement would go into effect for the freshman class of 2014, graduating in 2018. ADOPTED this 29th day of May, 2012. AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______Secretary, Board of Directors Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors May 29, 2012 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 (253) 931-4900 Serving Students in: Unincorporated King County City of Auburn City of Algona City of Kent City of Pacific City of Black Diamond BOARD of DIRECTORS Lisa Connors Carol Seng Janice Nelson Ray Vefik Anne Baunach Dr. Dennis Kip Herren, Superintendent Table of Contents Section I Executive Summary ……………………Page 1 Section II Enrollment Projections…………………Page 6 Section III Standard of Service…………………… Page 8 Section IV Inventory of Facilities……………………Page 15 Section V Pupil Capacity……………………………Page 19 Section VI Capital Construction Plan………………Page 22 Section VII Impact Fees………………………………Page 26 Section VIII Appendices…………………………..… Page 30 Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Page 31 Appendix A.2 - Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 45 Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey Page 50 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2012 through 2018 Section I Executive Summary Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 I. Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the “Plan”) has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the “District”) as the District’s principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington’s Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2012. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District’s needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and trends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the City of Auburn and City of Kent; the King County Council, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction’s respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona, Pacific and Black Diamond, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ordinances, the Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District’s “standard of service” in order to ascertain the District’s current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District’s specific needs. In general, the District’s current standard provides that class size for grades K-2 should not exceed 25 students; class size for grades 3-4 should not exceed 27 students; class size for grade 5 should not exceed 30 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 26.5 students per classroom. Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. (See Section III for more specific information.) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District’s 2011-12 capacity was 13,725). The actual number of individual students was 14,363 as of October 1, 2011. (See Section V for more specific information.) The capital construction plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions and proposed modernization to the District’s existing facilities. This provided for a new high school approved by the voters in February 2003 and opened in September 2005; and the addition of two new elementary schools approved by the voters in February 2005; with Lakeland Hills Elementary opening in the Fall of 2006 and Arthur Jacobsen Elementary opening in the Fall of 2007. The plan includes the construction of a new middle school and a new elementary school, as well as the acquisition of future school sites to accommodate growth. The new facilities are required to meet the projected student population increase to be generated from the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Three areas that have significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South, the Lea Hill, and the north Auburn valley areas of the district. 2 There are other pockets of development that impact the District as well. The City of Kent has an area of approximately 158 acres that was sold to developers in 2004. The economic downturn has slowed development in these areas, but recent new construction is beginning to pick back up. The district completed a comprehensive review of all district facilities and in October 2008 a Steering Committee made recommendations to the board for capital improvements to existing facilities and replacement of seven schools over the next ten years. These recommendations led to a capital improvements levy and a bond issue that was placed on the ballot in March 2009. Both ballot measures were not successful in March. The board determined to re-run only the capital improvements levy in November 2009, which the voters approved. In the Fall of 2011 the school board determined to move forward with the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project and place before the voters in February of 2012. The bond issue was supported by the community at nearly 57% approval rate, but was short of the super majority requirement of 60%. In March of 2012 the school board determined to rerun the bond again in November of 2012. The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impact incurred by a District experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi-family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been generated using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi-family developments constructed in the last five years. The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS; and to integrate the mapping with student data from the district’s student data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3. 3 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2011 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2012 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. Section I Executive Summary A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. B. Summary level list of changes from previous year. Section II Enrollment Projections Updated projections. See Appendices A.1 & A.2. Section III Standard of Service A. Decrease of 2 structured learning classrooms at elementary level B. Increase of 1 Nativie American resource room at elementary level C. Increase of 2 full-day kindergarten classrooms at elementary level D. Increase of 1 structured learning classrooms at middle level E. Increase of 3 structured learning classrooms at high school level F. Decrease of 1 special education resource room at high school level Section IV Inventory of Facilities No change from 2011-12 to 2012-13. Section V Pupil Capacity No change from 2011-12 to 2012-13. 4 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Section VII Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2011 to 2012 CPF CPF DATA ELEMENTS 2011 2012 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 0.3130 0.2610 Student Generation Factors are calculated Mid School 0.1540 0.1300 by the school district based on district Sr. High 0.1650 0.1340 records of average actual student generation Multi-Family rates for new developments constructed Elementary 0.1240 0.1720 over the last five years. Mid School 0.0560 0.0700 Sr. High 0.5190 0.0900 School Construction Costs Elementary $21,750,000 $21,750,000 Middle School $42,500,000 $42,500,000 Site Acquisition Costs Cost per acre $290,381 $326,827 Updated estimates on land costs Area Cost Allowance Boeckh In $183.78 $188.55 Updated to projected SPI schedule. Match % - State 58.67% 58.49% Updated to current SPI schedule. Match % - District 41.33% 41.51% Computed District Average AV Single Family $248,795 $223,057 Updated from March 2012 King County Dept of Assessments data. Multi-Family $67,821 $68,902 Updated from March 2012 King County Dept of Assessments data using weighted average. Debt Serv Tax Rate $0.93 $0.98 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 4.91% 3.84% Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-12) Section VIII Appendices Appendix A.1 - Updated enrollment projections from October 1, 2011 Appendix A.2 - Updated enrollment projections with anticipated buildout schedule. Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey March 2012 5 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2012 through 2018 Section II Enrollment Projections Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS The Auburn School District uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all of the District's operations. Table II.1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found in Appendix A.2 titled "CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections". This Table shows the anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous 6 year history of the District under the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projections, Appendix A.1, and the projection for additional students generated from new developments in the district as shown in Appendix A.2. TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT II.1 PROJECTIONS (March 2012) 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 GRADE Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected KDG 1029 1052 1078 1105 1137 1169 1199 1 1068 1077 1104 1131 1163 1196 1226 2 1097 1086 1098 1126 1157 1190 1220 3 996 1112 1103 1117 1149 1181 1211 4 1022 1033 1152 1145 1163 1196 1226 5 1018 1042 1056 1176 1174 1193 1223 K - 5 6230 6402 6591 6800 6943 7125 7306 6 1063 1021 1049 1064 1188 1187 1204 7 1032 1081 1043 1071 1091 1217 1213 8 1046 1046 1099 1062 1095 1116 1239 6 - 8 3141 3149 3191 3197 3374 3519 3655 9 1273 1260 1265 1322 1292 1329 1350 10 1170 1278 1269 1276 1337 1309 1343 11 1233 1146 1257 1250 1262 1325 1294 12 1316 1251 1167 1281 1279 1293 1352 9 - 12 4992 4934 4958 5127 5170 5256 5339 TOTALS 14,363 14,485 14,740 15,125 15,487 15,901 16,299 GRADES K-12 Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected K-5 w/K @ 1/2 5716 5876 6051 6247 6374 6541 6706 6-8 3141 3149 3191 3197 3374 3519 3655 9-12 4992 4934 4958 5127 5170 5256 5339 K-12 w/K @ 1/2 13,849 13,959 14,200 14,572 14,919 15,317 15,700 Note: The district is currently operating Full Day Kindergarten in eight schools and includes two state funded Full Day Kindergartens at two additional elementary schools. 7 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2012 through 2018 Section III Standard of Service Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 STANDARD OF SERVICE The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service" in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house its projected student population. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity" guidelines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects. By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The SPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the SPI guidelines. The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations. OVERVIEW The Auburn School District operates fourteen elementary schools housing 6,230 students in grades K through 5. For Kindergarten students; 687 of the 1,029 attend 1/2 days throughout the year and 5,201 students, grades 1 through 5, plus 340 kindergartners, attend on a full day basis. When converted to full time equivalents, the K-5 enrollment is 5,885. The four middle schools house 3,141 students in grades 6 through 8. The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school, housing 4,992 students in grades 9 through 12. CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population. Specialists create additional space needs. Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space. The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 26.5 students per teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 26.5 students per room at grades K - 5. At grades 6 - 12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room. The SPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level. ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses eight classrooms to provide for 72 students. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines. No loss of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population. ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior disabilities at the elementary school level. The program uses one classroom to provide for seven students. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space allocations by one classroom. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 26.5 each = (27) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (27) 9 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Fourteen standard classrooms are required to house this program. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines by seven standard classrooms. The loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 26.5 each = (186) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (186) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates two resource rooms to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level. Two standard classrooms is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 26.5 each = (53) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (53) HEAD START The Auburn School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 114 youngsters in six sections of 1/2 day in length. The program is housed at three elementary schools and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 26.5 each = (80) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (80) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children with disabilities below age five. This program is housed at seven different elementary schools and currently uses 10 standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 26.5 each = (265) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (265) READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 26.5 each = (106) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (106) 10 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 STANDARD OF SERVICE MUSIC ROOMS The district elementary music programs require one acoustically modified classroom at each elementary school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 26.5 each = (371) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (371) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires fourteen standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 26.5 each = (371) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (371) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for seven highly impacted elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 26.5 each = (212) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (212) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders. This program model has been created from the I-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all fourteen elementary schools. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 26.5 each = (371) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (371) FULL DAY KINDERGARTEN The Auburn School District provides Full-Day Kindergarten programs to increase academic skills for kindergarten students. This program model has been created from tuition, Title I funds and currently there are two schools receiving state funding for 2011-12 school year. The district is utilizing 16 classrooms at eight of the fourteen elementary schools. Housing requirements exceed the OSPI space guidelines for this program by seven classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 26.5 each = (212) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (212) 11 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 STANDARD OF SERVICE MIDDLE SCHOOLS SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities. Eight classrooms are required at the middle school level to provide for approximately 316 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines. ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior diabilities. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses one classroom. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations. STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates five structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate to severe disabilities and one developmentally disabled classroom for students with profound disabilities. Three of the five classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 26.5 each = (80) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (80) MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates a minimum of one computer lab at each middle school. This program utilizes a standard classroom per middle school. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report #3 dated 12/14/11 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the mid-level facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each = (240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (240) 12 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 STANDARD OF SERVICE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schools. This program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Auburn. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each = (210) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (210) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for students learning English as a second language. This program requires three standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 30 each = (90) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (90) ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior diabilities. The program is housed at one of the high schools and uses one classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 30 each = (30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (30) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates nine structured learning center classrooms for students with moderate to severe disabilities. This program requires five standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 30 each = (150) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (150) SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current high school program requires 10 classrooms to provide program to meet educational needs of the students. The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the 10 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 9 rooms @ 30 each = (270) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (270) 13 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 STANDARD OF SERVICE PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center. The SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for nor is it usable for classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts. Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 8.33 classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8.33 rooms @ 30 each = (250) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. There are 185 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each = (300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (300) STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity = (2,253) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (2,253) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity = (560) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (560) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity = (1,300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,300) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity = (4,112) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (4,112) 14 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2012 through 2018 Section IV Inventory of Facilities Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES Table IV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities. Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school. The district uses relocatable facilities to: 1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting. 2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants. Core facilities (i.e. gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. Table Permanent Facilities District School Facilities IV.1 @ OSPI Rated Capacity (December 2011) Building Capacity Acres Address Elementary Schools Washington Elementary 486 5.40 20 E Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Terminal Park Elementary 408 6.70 1101 D Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Dick Scobee Elementary 477 10.50 1031 14th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Pioneer Elementary 441 8.30 2301 M Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Chinook Elementary 440 8.75 3502 Auburn Way South, Auburn WA, 98092 Lea Hill Elementary 450 10.00 30908 124th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Gildo Rey Elementary 551 10.00 1005 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Evergreen Heights Elem. 456 8.09 5602 South 316th, Auburn WA, 98001 Alpac Elementary 497 10.60 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North, Pacific WA, 98047 Lake View Elementary 559 16.40 16401 Southeast 318th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Hazelwood Elementary 580 12.67 11815 Southeast 304th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Ilalko Elementary 585 12.00 301 Oravetz Place Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Lakeland Hills Elementary 594 12.00 1020 Evergreen Way SE, Auburn WA, 98092 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 614 10.00 29205 132nd Street SE, Auburn WA, 98092 ELEM CAPACITY 7,138 Middle Schools Cascade Middle School 829 17.30 1015 24th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Olympic Middle School 921 17.40 1825 K Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Rainier Middle School 843 26.33 30620 116th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Mt. Baker Middle School 837 30.88 620 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 MS CAPACITY 3,430 Senior High Schools West Auburn High School 233 5.10 401 West Main Street, Auburn WA, 98001 Auburn Senior High 2,101 18.60 800 Fourth Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Auburn Riverside HS 1,387 33.00 501 Oravetz Road, Auburn WA, 98092 Auburn Mountainview HS 1,443 40.00 28900 124th Ave SE, Auburn WA, 98092 SH CAPACITY 5,164 TOTAL CAPACITY 15,732 16 Auburn School District Boundary kAUBURN MOUNTAINVIEW kARTHUR JACOBSEN CASCADE HAZELWOOD k RAINIERk k kLEA HILL kEVERGREEN HEIGHTS kDICK SCOBEE kLAKE VIEW kAUBURN HIGH WESTk AUBURN HIGHkWASHINGTON kTERMINAL PARK kOLYMPIC kPIONEER kCHINOOK kGILDO REY kMT. BAKER kALPAC kAUBURN RIVERSIDE kILALKO E E E Y VD L S B E W E A 1 1ST ST E IT 1 S 2ND ST E V V S H LAKELAND HILLS O V J 9T R A V A E Y 4TH ST DWARDS R E D E 1 k6 5 A 2 H E E ND S T T 6 SE D 1 T L 7 E H A N 0 L 8TH T S N T E E 2 V H 8 T S A S S I 8TH ST H U E 64T 8 T W T T V B E 1 H E E 9TH ST E N E Y T T S D TH E E A V 7 N S 6 12TH ST E Y I L W K V A K A P E 12TH ST E A S E P E H P 2 V TA R 1 T E K D 0 4 A 16TH ST E 16TH ST E L T E T 1 16TH S E H 1 E 1 18TH ST E E 1 A 6 8 T V C 6 V S 9 T E A C O T E E R H H AV V H V 1 T 1 T H 8 A A 19 A 7 E 6 T A T 7 A V 9 1 V 8 8 24TH S H V T E 1 T H 2 G E H 4TH ST E 4 E 5 E TCT T 7 H S A D T T 23R 1 W E 1 6 H E A S T E H 2 Y R E A C E V 1 T T 112 T D V V 0 S S V E V A E A 1 H E A V T A 1 6 H 2 D E D 32ND ST E E T C Burton-May2012 N Y KW 4 N ISLAND P 2 1 2 2 2 4 1 1 34TH 36TH ST E ST E 34TH ST E Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES TABLE TEMPORARY/RELOCATABLE IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY (March 2012) Elementary Location 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Terminal Park 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Dick Scobee 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Pioneer 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Chinook 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Lea Hill 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 Gildo Rey 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Evergreen Heights 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 Alpac 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lake View 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Hazelwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ilalko 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Lakeland Hills Elementary 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 32 32 33 33 33 33 33 TOTAL CAPACITY 848 848 875 875 875 875 875 Middle School Location 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 Cascade 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 Olympic 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 Rainier 5 5 7 7 8 8 8 Mt. Baker 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 TOTAL UNITS 13 13 15 19 20 20 20 TOTAL CAPACITY 390 390 450 570 600 600 600 Sr. High School Location 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 West Auburn 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 Auburn High School 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Auburn High School - *TAP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Auburn Riverside 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Auburn Mountainview 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 26 26 26 27 27 27 27 TOTAL CAPACITY 780 780 780 810 810 810 810 *TAP - Transition Assistance Program for 18-21 year old students with special needs. COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 71 71 74 79 80 80 80 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 2,018 2,018 2,105 2,255 2,285 2,285 2,285 18 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2012 through 2018 Section V Pupil Capacity Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 PUPIL CAPACITY While the Auburn School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III, Standard of Service. The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new unfunded facilities. The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V.1 and V.2 below. Table V.1 shows the Distict's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V.2 without these units. Table V.1 Capacity WITH relocatables 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 A. SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,532 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 550 1/ A.2 SPI Capacity- New MS 800 B. Capacity Adjustments (1,954) (2,094) (2,094) (2,008) (1,858) (1,828) (1,828) C. Net Capacity 13,778 13,638 13,638 13,725 13,875 14,705 15,255 D. ASD Enrollment 14,363 14,485 14,740 15,125 15,487 15,901 16,229 3/ E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (585) (847) (1,102) (1,401) (1,613) (1,197) (975) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Include Relocatable 2,018 2,018 2,018 2,105 2,255 2,285 2,285 2/ Exclude SOS (pg 14) (3,972) (4,112) (4,112) (4,112) (4,112) (4,112) (4,112) Total Adjustments (1,954) (2,094) (2,094) (2,008) (1,858) (1,828) (1,828) Table V.2 Capacity WITHOUT relocatables 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 A. SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,532 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 550 1/ A.2 SPI Capacity- New MS 800 B. Capacity Adjustments (3,972) (4,112) (4,112) (4,112) (4,112) (4,112) (4,112) C. Net Capacity 11,760 11,620 11,620 11,620 11,620 12,420 12,970 D. ASD Enrollment 14,363 14,485 14,740 15,125 15,487 15,901 16,229 3/ E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (2,603) (2,865) (3,120) (3,505) (3,867) (3,481) (3,259) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS 2/ Exclude SOS (pg 14) (3,972) (4,112) (4,112) (4,112) (4,112) (4,112) (4,112) Total Adjustments (3,972) (4,112) (4,112) (4,112) (4,112) (4,112) (4,112) 1/ New facilities shown in 2016-17 and 2017-18 are not funded under the current Capital Facilities Plan. 2/ The Standard of Service represents 25.38% of SPI capacity. When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 23.35% of SPI capacity. 3/ Students beyond the capacity are accomodated in other spaces (commons, library, theater, shared teaching space). 20 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 PERMANENT FACILITIES PUPIL CAPACITY @ SPI Rated Capacity (March 2012) A. Elementary Schools Building 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 Washington 486 486 486 486 486 486 486 Terminal Park 408 408 408 408 408 408 408 Dick Scobee 477 477 477 477 477 477 477 Pioneer 441 441 441 441 441 441 441 Chinook 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 Lea Hill 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 Gildo Rey 551 551 551 551 551 551 551 Evergreen Heights 456 456 456 456 456 456 456 Alpac 497 497 497 497 497 497 497 Lake View 559 559 559 559 559 559 559 Hazelwood 580 580 580 580 580 580 580 Ilalko 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Lakeland Hills 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 Arthur Jacobsen 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 Elementary #15 585 ELEM CAPACITY 7,138 7,138 7,138 7,138 7,138 7,138 7,723 B. Middle Schools Building 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 Cascade 829 829 829 829 829 829 829 Olympic 921 921 921 921 921 921 921 Rainier 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 Mt. Baker 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 Middle School #5 800 800 MS CAPACITY 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 4,230 4,230 C. Senior High Schools Building 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 West Auburn 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 Auburn 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 Auburn Riverside 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 Auburn Mountainview 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 SH CAPACITY 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 COMBINED CAPACITY 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,532 17,117 21 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2012 through 2018 Section VI Capital Construction Plan Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The result of this committee's work was published in the document titled 'Guidelines for Development.' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to pick up from the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities. The committee recommendations are published in the document titled 'Education Into The Twenty-First Century - - A Community Involved.' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation, funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs. The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department. In 2005 a replacement technology levy was approved to continue to support technology across all facets of the District’s teaching, learning and operations. In addition to the technology needs of the District, the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hoc recommendation included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of assessment. A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that provided $8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District; and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites. During the 1997-98 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland South at that time was immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District. On June 16, 1998 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998 the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998 the Dieringer School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties. In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the board in the Fall of 2002: a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This included the review of possible financing plans for new facilities. b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built. 23 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN This committee recommended the board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71% yes votes. The school opened in the Fall of 2005. In the Fall of 2003 the school board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for Elementary #13 and Elementary #14. In the Fall of 2004, the Auburn School Board passed Resolution No. 1054 to place two elementary schools on the ballot in February 2005. The voters approved the ballot measure in February of 2005 at 64.72%. Lakeland Hills Elementary (Elementary #13) opened in the Fall of 2006. Arthur Jacobsen Elementary (Elementary #14) is located in the Lea Hill area on a 10 acre site and opened in the Fall of 2007. These two elementary schools were built to accommodate the housing growth in Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill areas of the school district. In the 2004-05 school year, the Board convened a sixth Citizen’s Ad Hoc committee to again study and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District. One of the areas of study was the need for New Facilities and Modernization. The committee made a number of recommendations including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities based upon criterion. During the 2005-06 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Kent School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a number of projected developments in the north Auburn valley. On May 17, 2006 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Kent Boards of Directors. On June 14, 2006 the Kent School Board adopted Resolution No. 1225 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 26, 2006 the Auburn School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 1073 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from the Kent School District to the Auburn School District effective September 29, 2006. In October of 2008, after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee made recommendations to the school board regarding the capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities as recommended by the 2004-05 Citizen’s Ad Hoc Committee. These recommendations, based on specific criteria, led to the school board placing a school improvement bond and capital improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009. Voters did not approve either measure that would have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools. The board decided to place only a six-year Capital Levy on the ballot in November of 2009, which passed at 55.17%. The levy will fund $46.4 million of needed improvement projects at 24 sites over the next seven school years. Planning for the replacement of aging schools has started with educational specifications and schematic design process beginning in 2010. A future bond issue will be necessary to fund these projects. The Special Education Transition Facility opened in February of 2010. This facility is designed for students with disabilities that are 18 to 21 years old. The school district acquired a site for a future middle school in 2009 and will need to consider possibilities for a site for elementary school #15. 24 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN The District is projecting 1930 additional students within the six-year period including the Lakeland, Lea Hill, and north Auburn valley areas. This increase in student population will require the acquisition of new middle school and new elementary school sites and construction of a middle school and elementary school during the six-year window. Based upon the District's capacity data and enrollment projections, as well as the student generation data included in Appendix A.3, the District has determined that approximately eighty- six percent of the capacity improvements are necessary to serve the students generated from new development, with the remaining additional capacity required to address existing need. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population and passage of bond issues and/or capital improvement levies. 2012-18 Capital Construction Plan (March 2012) Projected Fund Project Timelines Project Funded Cost Source 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 All Facilities - 2006 Technology Yes $12,000,000 6 Year XX Modernization Cap Levy Impact Portables Yes $1,200,000 XX XX XX XX XX XX Fees Property Purchase 1/ Impact New Elementary No $3,500,000 Fees XX XX XX Multiple Facility Capital Yes $46,400,000 XX XX XX XX XX XX Improvements Levy Bond XX XX XX 1/ Middle School #5 No $42,500,000 Impact Fee plan const open Bond XX XX XX 1/ Elementary #15 No $21,750,000 Impact Fee plan const open AHS XX XX XX XX XX No $110,000 Bond Issue 1/ Modernization plan plan const const open 1/ These funds may be secured through local bond issues, sale of real property, impact fees, and state matching funds. The District currently is not eligible for state assistance at the elementary school level for new construction. The district is eligible for state matching funds for modernization. 25 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2012 through 2018 Section VII Impact Fees Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION (Spring 2012) Middle School #5 within 6 year period Elementary #15 within 6 year period I. SITE COST PER RESIDENCE Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Size) x Student Factor Site Cost/ Facility Student Generation Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elem (K - 5) 12 $308,155 550 0.2610 0.1720 $1,754.80 $1,156.42 Middle Sch (6 - 8) 25 $0 800 0.1300 0.0700 $0.00 $0.00 Sr High (9 - 12) 40 $0 1500 0.1340 0.0900 $0.00 $0.00 $1,754.80 $1,156.42 II. PERMANENT FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Size) x Student Factor) x (Permanent to Total Square Footage Percentage) Facility Facility % Perm Sq Ft/ Student Generation Factor Cost/ Cost/ Single Family Cost Size Total Sq Ft Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elem (K - 5) $21,750,000 550 0.9649 0.2610 0.1720 $9,958.69 $6,562.81 Mid Sch (6 - 8) $42,500,000 800 0.9649 0.1300 0.0700 $6,663.58 $3,588.08 Sr High (9 - 12) $0 1500 0.9649 0.1340 0.0900 $0.00 $0.00 $16,622.26 $10,150.89 III. TEMPORARY FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Size) x Student Factor) x (Temporary to Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Facility % Temp Sq Ft/ Student Generation Factor Cost/ Cost/ Single Family Cost Size Total Sq Ft Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elem (K - 5) $130,000 26.5 0.0351 0.2610 0.1720 $44.99 $29.65 Mid Sch (6 - 8) $130,000 30 0.0351 0.1300 0.0700 $19.79 $10.66 Sr High (9 - 12) $130,000 30 0.0351 0.1340 0.0900 $20.40 $13.70 $85.18 $54.01 IV. STATE MATCH CREDIT PER RESIDENCE Formula: (Boeckh Index x SPI Footage x District Match x Student Factor) Boeckh SPI District Student Generation Factor Cost/ Cost/ Index Footage Match Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elem (K - 5) $188.55 90 58.67% 0.2610 0.1720 $2,598.52 $1,712.43 Mid Sch (6 - 8) $188.55 108 58.67% 0.1300 0.0700 $1,553.14 $836.30 Sr High (9 - 12) $0.00 130 58.67% 0.1340 0.0900 $0.00 $0.00 $4,151.65 $2,548.75 27 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 V. TAX CREDIT PER RESIDENCE Formula: Expressed as the present value of an annuity TC = PV(interest rate,discount period,average assd value x tax rate) Ave Resid Curr Dbt Serv Bnd Byr Indx Number of Tax Credit Tax Credit Assd Value Tax Rate Ann Int Rate Years Single Family Multi Family Single Family $223,057 $0.98 3.84% 10 $1,787.21 Multi Family $68,902 $0.98 3.84% 10 $552.07 VI. DEVELOPER PROVIDED FACILITY CREDIT Formula: (Value of Site or Facility/Number of dwelling units) Value No. of Units Facility Credit Single Family $0.00 1 $0.00 Multi Family $0.00 1 $0.00 FEE PER UNIT IMPACT FEES RECAP Single Multi SUMMARY Family Family Site Costs $1,754.80 $1,156.42 Permanent Facility Const Costs $16,622.26 $10,150.89 Temporary Facility Costs $85.18 $54.01 State Match Credit ($4,151.65) ($2,548.75) Tax Credit ($1,787.21) ($552.07) FEE (No Discount) $12,523.38 $8,260.51 FEE (50% Discount) $6,261.69 $4,130.26 Less ASD Discount ($750.00) ($750.00) Facility Credit $0.00 $0.00 Net Fee Obligation $5,511.69 $3,380.26 28 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2012 through 2018 SINGLE FAMILY MULTI FAMILY IMPACT FEE ELEMENTS Elem Mid Sch Sr High Elem Mid Sch Sr High K - 5 6 - 8 9 - 12 K - 5 6 - 8 9 - 12 Student Factor Single Family - Auburn actual count (3/12) 0.261 0.130 0.134 0.172 0.070 0.090 New Fac Capacity 550 800 1500 550 800 1500 New Facility Cost Elementary Cost Estimates Feb 2008 $21,750,000 $42,500,000 $21,750,000 $42,500,000 Middle School Cost Estimate Feb 2008 Temp Rm Capacity ASD District Standard of Service. 26.5 30 30 26.5 30 30 Grades K - 5 @ 26.5 and 6 - 12 @ 30. Temp Facility Cost Relocatables, including site work, set up, and furnishing $130,000 $130,000 $130,000 $130,000 $130,000 $130,000 Site Acreage ASD District Standard or SPI Minimum 12 25 40 12 25 40 Site Cost/Acre See below $308,155 $308,155 $308,155 $308,155 $308,155 $308,155 Perm Sq Footage SPI Rpt #3 dated December 14, 2011 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 Temp Sq Footage 70 portables at 832 sq. ft. each + TAP 3500 61,740 61,740 61,740 61,740 61,740 61,740 Total Sq Footage Sum of Permanent and Temporary above 1,757,057 1,757,057 1,757,057 1,757,057 1,757,057 1,757,057 % - Perm Facilities Permanent Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. Footage 96.49% 96.49% 96.49% 96.49% 96.49% 96.49% % - Temp Facilities Temporary Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. Footage 3.51% 3.51% 3.51% 3.51% 3.51% 3.51% SPI Sq Ft/Student From SPI Regulations 90 108 130 90 108 130 Boeckh Index From SPI schedule for March 2012 $188.55 $188.55 $188.55 $188.55 $188.55 $188.55 Match % - State From SPI Webpage March 2012 58.67% 58.67% 58.67% 58.67% 58.67% 58.67% Match % - District Computed 41.33% 41.33% 41.33% 41.33% 41.33% 41.33% Dist Aver AV King County Department of Assessments March 2012 $223,057 $223,057 $223,057 $68,902 $68,902 $68,902 (multi family weighted average includes condos) Debt Serv Tax Rate Current Fiscal Year $0.98 $0.98 $0.98 $0.98 $0.98 $0.98 G. O Bond Int Rate Current Rate - (Bond Buyer 20 Index March 2012) 3.84% 3.84% 3.84% 3.84% 3.84% 3.84% Site Cost Projections Recent Property Purchase Purchase Purchase Adjusted Projected Annual Sites Latest Date Projected Acquisitions Acreage Year Price Cost/Acre Present Day Inflation Factor Required of Acquisition Cost/Acre Lakeland 12.00 2002 $2,701,043 $225,087 $310,687 Labrador 35.00 2008 $7,601,799 $217,194 $223,710 Lakeland East 27.00 2009 $9,092,160 $336,747 $336,747 Total 74.00 $19,395,002 $262,095 $290,381 1.00% Elementary 2015 $308,155 29 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2012 through 2018 Section VIII Appendix Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Auburn School District #408 Student Enrollment Projections October 2011 Introduction The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition, the ‘projector’ must make certain assumptions about the operant variables within the data being used. These assumptions are “judgmental” by definition. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future, or from the known to the unknown. The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrollment, sets out some quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today, and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen years and six years respectively. The results provide a trend, which reflects a long (13-year) and a short (6-year) base from which to extrapolate. Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used. The first uses the average increase or decrease over the past 13 and 6-year time frame and adds it to each succeeding year. The second derives what the average percentage Auburn kindergartners have been of live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques. Tables Table 1 – Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enrollments – page 3 The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This data shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each year. Table 2 – Historical Factors Used in Projections - page 4 This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been used in the subsequent projections. The three factors are: 1. Factor 1 – Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is sometimes referred to as the “holding power” or “cohort survival.” It is a measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next. 2. Factor 2 - Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6-year period. 3. Factor 3 – Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King County Live Births. This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the 5 previous years. From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next 4 years. 1 Table 3 – Projection Models – pages 5-13 This set of tables utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections. The models are explained briefly below. Table 3.13 (pg 5) – shows a projection based on the 13-year average gain in kindergarten (Factor 2) and the 13-year average change between grade levels (Factor 1). The data is shown for the district as a whole. Table 3.6 (pg 5) – shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3.13 except it shortens the historical to only the most recent 6 years. Table 3.13A and 3.6A (pg 6) – uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates are derived from the King County live births instead of the average gain. Tables 3E.13, 3E.6, 3E.13A, 3E.6A (pg 7) – breaks out the K-5 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. Tables 3MS.13, 3MS.6, 3MS.13A, 3MS.6A (pg 8) – breaks out the 6-8 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. Tables 3SH.13, 3SH.6, 3SH.13A, 3SH.6A (pg 9) – breaks out the 9-12 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. Table 4 (pg 10) – Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of comparison. Table 5 (pgs 11-13) – shows how well each projection model performed when compared with actual enrollments. Data is provided in both number and percent formats for the past 13 years. Summary This year we had the third consecutive year of decline in student enrollment of 119 students. The loss of those students changes our historical average gain in students. Over the past 6 years the gain is now .33% annually down from .97%; that equates to 46 students down from 136 in prior projections. Using the 13 year model, the average gain has dropped from .92% to .81% and equates to 109 students annually down from 122 students in prior year. Using the cohort survival models, the data below is a summary of the range of variation between the four models. This data can be used for planning for future needs of the district. The models show changes in the next six years: . Elementary level shows increase ranging from 496 to 657. (page 7) . Middle School level shows increase ranging from 310 to 352. (page 8) . High School level shows increases ranging from 5 to 13. (page 9) The models show these changes looking forward thirteen years: . Elementary level shows increase ranging from 1287 to 1419. (page 7) . Middle School level shows increase ranging from 502 to 625. (page 8) . High School level shows increase ranging from 582 to 625. (page 9) This data does not factor new developments that are currently under construction or in the planning stages. 2 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2011 TABLE Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enrollments(Rev 10/11) 1 Actual GRADE 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 KDG 849 912 846 905 922 892 955 941 996 998 1032 1010 1029 1 943 905 968 900 982 960 963 1012 995 1015 1033 1066 1068 2 1015 914 949 961 909 992 963 1002 1019 1024 998 1016 1097 3 1054 1031 966 940 996 918 1002 1031 997 1048 993 1013 996 4 1012 1071 1077 973 947 1016 939 1049 1057 1044 1073 1024 1022 5 983 1011 1108 1062 1018 957 1065 998 1078 1069 1030 1079 1018 6 981 998 1028 1104 1111 1020 1004 1058 1007 1096 1040 1041 1063 7 1015 979 1017 1021 1131 1124 1028 1014 1057 1034 1125 1060 1032 8 974 1003 1004 1026 1052 1130 1137 1072 1033 1076 1031 1112 1046 9 1202 1222 1405 1441 1473 1461 1379 1372 1337 1256 1244 1221 1273 10 1132 1157 1073 1234 1249 1261 1383 1400 1368 1341 1277 1238 1170 11 1036 1067 1090 927 1010 1055 1182 1322 1352 1350 1303 1258 1233 12 855 865 930 933 902 886 1088 1147 1263 1352 1410 1344 1316 TOTALS 13051 13135 13461 13427 13702 13672 14088 14418 14559 14703 14589 14482 14363 Percent of Gain 0.64% 2.48% (0.25)% 2.05% (0.22)% 3.04% 2.34% 0.98% 0.99% (0.78)% (0.73)% (0.82)% Pupil Gain 84 326 (34) 275 (30) 416 330 141 144 (114) (107) (119) Average % Gain for 1st 6 years. 1.29% Average % Gain for last 6 years 0.33% Average Pupil Gain for 1st 6 years. 173 Average Pupil Gain for last 6 years 46 Average % Gain for 13 years. 0.81% Average Pupil Gain for 13 years. 109 TABLE 1A Grade Group Combinations KDG 849 912 846 905 922 892 955 941 996 998 1032 1010 1029 K,1,2 2807 2731 2763 2766 2813 2844 2881 2955 3010 3037 3063 3092 3194 K - 5 5856 5844 5914 5741 5774 5735 5887 6033 6142 6198 6159 6208 6230 K - 6 6837 6842 6942 6845 6885 6755 6891 7091 7149 7294 7199 7249 7293 1 - 3 3012 2850 2883 2801 2887 2870 2928 3045 3011 3087 3024 3095 3161 1 - 5 5007 4932 5068 4836 4852 4843 4932 5092 5146 5200 5127 5198 5201 1 - 6 5988 5930 6096 5940 5963 5863 5936 6150 6153 6296 6167 6239 6264 6 - 8 2970 2980 3049 3151 3294 3274 3169 3144 3097 3206 3196 3213 3141 7 - 8 1989 1982 2021 2047 2183 2254 2165 2086 2090 2110 2156 2172 2078 7 - 9 3191 3204 3426 3488 3656 3715 3544 3458 3427 3366 3400 3393 3351 9 - 12 4225 4311 4498 4535 4634 4663 5032 5241 5320 5299 5234 5061 4992 10 - 12 3023 3089 3093 3094 3161 3202 3653 3869 3983 4043 3990 3840 3719 prj11-12 Page 3 October 2011 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2011 TABLE Factors Used in Projections 2 Factor AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENTS 3 AS FUNCTION OF KING COUNTY LIVE BIRTH RATES Factor Average Pupil Change Between Grade CAL- TOTAL YEAR ADJUSTED AUBURN KINDERGARTEN 1 Levels ENDAR LIVE 2/3rds 1/3rds OF LIVE KDG ENROLLMENT AS A % OF 13 YEAR BASE 6 YEAR BASE YEAR BIRTHS BIRTHS BIRTHS ENROLL BIRTHS ENROLL. ADJUSTED LIVE BIRTHS K to 1 50.75 K to 1 42.83 1973 13,449 8,966 4,483 79/80 13,478 618 4.585% 1 to 2 8.50 1 to 2 12.00 1974 13,493 8,995 4,498 80/81 13,524 600 4.436% 2 to 3 14.08 2 to 3 9.33 1975 13,540 9,027 4,513 81/82 13,687 588 4.296% 3 to 4 25.25 3 to 4 30.83 1976 13,761 9,174 4,587 82/83 14,375 698 4.856% 4 to 5 17.58 4 to 5 14.33 1977 14,682 9,788 4,894 83/84 14,958 666 4.452% 5 to 6 9.33 5 to 6 (2.33) 1978 15,096 10,064 5,032 84/85 16,048 726 4.524% 6 to 7 11.17 6 to 7 12.67 1979 16,524 11,016 5,508 85/86 16,708 792 4.740% 7 to 8 9.75 7 to 8 8.67 1980 16,800 11,200 5,600 86/87 17,000 829 4.876% 8 to 9 286.17 8 to 9 207.00 1981 17,100 11,400 5,700 87/88 18,241 769 4.216% 9 to 10 (71.83) 9 to 10 (2.50) 1982 18,811 12,541 6,270 88/89 18,626 817 4.386% 10 to 11 (80.33) 10 to 11 (31.50) 1983 18,533 12,355 6,178 89/90 18,827 871 4.626% 11 to 12 (43.00) 11 to 12 10.83 1984 18,974 12,649 6,325 90/91 19,510 858 4.398% total 237.42 total 312.17 1985 19,778 13,185 6,593 91/92 19,893 909 4.569% Factor 1 is the average gain or loss of pupils as they 1986 19,951 13,301 6,650 92/93 21,852 920 4.210% move from one grade level to the next. Factor 1 uses 1987 22,803 15,202 7,601 93/94 21,624 930 4.301% the past (12) OR (5) years of changes. 1988 21,034 14,023 7,011 94/95 24,062 927 3.853% 1989 25,576 17,051 8,525 95/96 26,358 954 3.619% Factor Average Pupil Change By Grade Level 1990 26,749 17,833 8,916 96/97 24,116 963 3.993% 2 1991 22,799 15,199 7,600 97/98 20,973 978 4.663% 13 YEAR BASE 6 YEAR BASE 1992 20,060 13,373 6,687 98/99 21,573 854 3.959% K 15.00 K 17.60 1993 22,330 14,887 7,443 99/00 22,129 849 3.837% 1 10.42 1 11.20 1994 22,029 14,686 7,343 00/01 24,013 912 3.798% 2 6.83 2 19.00 1995 25,005 16,670 8,335 01/02 22,717 846 3.724% 3 (4.83) 3 (7.00) 1996 21,573 14,382 7,191 02/03 21,622 905 4.186% 40.834(5.40) 1997 21,646 14,431 7,215 03/04 22,023 922 4.186% 5 2.92 5 4.00 1998 22,212 14,808 7,404 04/05 22,075 892 4.041% 6 6.83 6 1.00 1999 22,007 14,671 7,336 05/06 22,327 955 4.277% 7 1.42 7 3.60 2000 22,487 14,991 7,496 06/07 22,014 941 4.274% 86.008(5.20) 2001 21,778 14,519 7,259 07/08 21,835 996 4.562% Last 5 95.929(19.80) 2002 21,863 14,575 7,288 08/09 22,242 998 4.487% year 10 3.17 10 (46.00) 2003 22,431 14,954 7,477 09/10 22,726 1032 4.541% Average 11 16.42 11 (17.80) 2004 22,874 15,249 7,625 10/11 22,745 1010 4.441% 4.474% 12 38.42 12 33.80 2005 22,680 15,120 7,560 11/12 23,723 1029 Actual 4.338% Factor 2 is the average change in grade level size 2006 24,244 16,163 8,081 12/13 24,683 1017 <--Prjctd Average from 94/95 OR 01/02. 2007 24,902 16,601 8,301 13/14 25,094 1061 <--Prjctd Average 2008 25,190 16,793 8,397 14/15 25,101 1104 <--Prjctd Average 2009 25,057 16,705 8,352 15/16 24,695 1123 <--Prjctd Average 2010 24,514 16,343 8,171 16/17 * number from DOH Source: Center for Health Statistics, Washington State Department of Health prj11-12 Page 4 October 2011 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2011 Contact Todd Rime - [email protected] 360-236-4323 TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS 3.13 Based on 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 KDG 1029 1044 1059 1074 1089 1104 1119 1134 1149 1164 1179 1194 1209 1224 1 1068 1080 1095 1110 1125 1140 1155 1170 1185 1200 1215 1230 1245 1260 2 1097 1077 1088 1103 1118 1133 1148 1163 1178 1193 1208 1223 1238 1253 3 996 1111 1091 1102 1117 1132 1147 1162 1177 1192 1207 1222 1237 1252 4 1022 1021 1136 1116 1128 1143 1158 1173 1188 1203 1218 1233 1248 1263 5 1018 1040 1039 1154 1133 1145 1160 1175 1190 1205 1220 1235 1250 1265 6 1063 1027 1049 1048 1163 1143 1155 1170 1185 1200 1215 1230 1245 1260 7 1032 1074 1039 1060 1059 1174 1154 1166 1181 1196 1211 1226 1241 1256 8 1046 1042 1084 1048 1070 1069 1184 1164 1175 1190 1205 1220 1235 1250 9 1273 1332 1328 1370 1334 1356 1355 1470 1450 1462 1477 1492 1507 1522 10 1170 1201 1260 1256 1298 1263 1284 1283 1399 1378 1390 1405 1420 1435 4813 11 1233 1090 1121 1180 1176 1218 1182 1204 1203 1318 1298 1309 1324 1339 12 1316 1190 1047 1078 1137 1133 1175 1139 1161 1160 1275 1255 1266 1281 TOTALS 14363 14328 14435 14700 14948 15153 15376 15573 15820 16061 16317 16473 16665 16860 Percent of Gain (0.24)% 0.74% 1.83% 1.69% 1.37% 1.48% 1.28% 1.59% 1.52% 1.60% 0.96% 1.16% 1.17% Pupil Gain (35) 106 265 249 204 224 197 247 241 256 156 192 195 TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS 3.6 Based on 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 KDG 1029 1047 1064 1082 1099 1117 1135 1152 1170 1187 1205 1223 1240 1258 1 1068 1072 1089 1107 1125 1142 1160 1177 1195 1213 1230 1248 1265 1283 2 1097 1080 1084 1101 1119 1137 1154 1172 1189 1207 1225 1242 1260 1277 3 996 1106 1089 1093 1111 1128 1146 1164 1181 1199 1216 1234 1252 1269 4 1022 1027 1137 1120 1124 1142 1159 1177 1194 1212 1230 1247 1265 1282 5 1018 1036 1041 1152 1135 1138 1156 1174 1191 1209 1226 1244 1262 1279 6 1063 1016 1034 1039 1149 1132 1136 1154 1171 1189 1206 1224 1242 1259 7 1032 1076 1028 1047 1052 1162 1145 1149 1166 1184 1201 1219 1237 1254 8 1046 1041 1084 1037 1055 1060 1171 1154 1157 1175 1193 1210 1228 1245 9 1273 1253 1248 1291 1244 1262 1267 1378 1361 1364 1382 1400 1417 1435 10 1170 1271 1251 1245 1289 1242 1260 1265 1375 1358 1362 1379 1397 1415 11 1233 1139 1239 1219 1214 1257 1210 1228 1233 1344 1327 1330 1348 1366 12 1316 1244 1149 1250 1230 1225 1268 1221 1239 1244 1354 1337 1341 1359 TOTALS 14363 14406 14538 14783 14945 15144 15366 15562 15824 16084 16357 16538 16753 16981 Percent of Gain 0.30% 0.92% 1.68% 1.09% 1.33% 1.47% 1.28% 1.68% 1.65% 1.70% 1.10% 1.30% 1.37% Pupil Gain 43 133 245 162 199 222 196 261 260 273 180 215 229 prj11-12 Page 5 October 2011 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2011 TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS 3.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 K 1029 1017 1061 1104 1123 1 1068 1080 1068 1112 1155 1173 2 1097 1077 1088 1077 1120 1163 1182 3 996 1111 1091 1102 1091 1135 1178 1196 4 1022 1021 1136 1116 1128 1116 1160 1203 1221 5 1018 1040 1039 1154 1133 1145 1134 1177 1220 1239 6 1063 1027 1049 1048 1163 1143 1155 1143 1187 1230 1248 7 1032 1074 1039 1060 1059 1174 1154 1166 1154 1198 1241 1259 8 1046 1042 1084 1048 1070 1069 1184 1164 1175 1164 1208 1251 1269 9 1273 1332 1328 1370 1334 1356 1355 1470 1450 1462 1450 1494 1537 1555 10 1170 1201 1260 1256 1298 1263 1284 1283 1399 1378 1390 1378 1422 1465 11 1233 1090 1121 1180 1176 1218 1182 1204 1203 1318 1298 1309 1298 1342 12 1316 1190 1047 1078 1137 1133 1175 1139 1161 1160 1275 1255 1266 1255 TOTALS 14363 14302 14411 14706 14988 Percent of Gain (0.43)% 0.76% 2.05% 1.92% Pupil Gain (61) 109 295 282 TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS 3.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 KDG 1029 1017 1061 1104 1123 1 1068 1072 1060 1104 1147 1165 2 1097 1080 1084 1072 1116 1159 1177 3 996 1106 1089 1093 1082 1125 1168 1187 4 1022 1027 1137 1120 1124 1112 1156 1199 1218 5 1018 1036 1041 1152 1135 1138 1127 1171 1214 1232 6 1063 1016 1034 1039 1149 1132 1136 1124 1168 1211 1230 7 1032 1076 1028 1047 1052 1162 1145 1149 1137 1181 1224 1242 8 1046 1041 1084 1037 1055 1060 1171 1154 1157 1146 1190 1233 1251 9 1273 1253 1248 1291 1244 1262 1267 1378 1361 1364 1353 1397 1440 1458 10 1170 1271 1251 1245 1289 1242 1260 1265 1375 1358 1362 1350 1394 1437 11 1233 1139 1239 1219 1214 1257 1210 1228 1233 1344 1327 1330 1319 1363 12 1316 1244 1149 1250 1230 1225 1268 1221 1239 1244 1354 1337 1341 1330 TOTALS 14363 14377 14506 14773 14958 Percent of Gain 0.10% 0.90% 1.84% 1.25% Pupil Gain 14 130 267 185 prj11-12 Page 6 October 2011 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2011 TABLE K - 5 PROJECTIONS 3E.13 Based on 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 KDG 1029 1044 1059 1074 1089 1104 1119 1134 1149 1164 1179 1194 1209 1224 1 1068 1080 1095 1110 1125 1140 1155 1170 1185 1200 1215 1230 1245 1260 2 1097 1077 1088 1103 1118 1133 1148 1163 1178 1193 1208 1223 1238 1253 3 996 1111 1091 1102 1117 1132 1147 1162 1177 1192 1207 1222 1237 1252 4 1022 1021 1136 1116 1128 1143 1158 1173 1188 1203 1218 1233 1248 1263 5 1018 1040 1039 1154 1133 1145 1160 1175 1190 1205 1220 1235 1250 1265 6 year 13 year K - 5 TOT 6230 6372 6508 6659 6710 6797 6887 6977 7067 7157 7247 7337 7427 7517 657 1287 Percent of Gain 2.28% 2.13% 2.33% 0.77% 1.29% 1.32% 1.31% 1.29% 1.27% 1.26% 1.24% 1.23% 1.21% Pupil Gain 142 136 151 51 87 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 TABLE K - 5 PROJECTIONS 3E.6 Based on 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 KDG 1029 1047 1064 1082 1099 1117 1135 1152 1170 1187 1205 1223 1240 1258 1 1068 1072 1089 1107 1125 1142 1160 1177 1195 1213 1230 1248 1265 1283 2 1097 1080 1084 1101 1119 1137 1154 1172 1189 1207 1225 1242 1260 1277 3 996 1106 1089 1093 1111 1128 1146 1164 1181 1199 1216 1234 1252 1269 4 1022 1027 1137 1120 1124 1142 1159 1177 1194 1212 1230 1247 1265 1282 5 1018 1036 1041 1152 1135 1138 1156 1174 1191 1209 1226 1244 1262 1279 6 year 13 year K - 5 TOT 6230 6368 6505 6655 6712 6804 6910 7015 7121 7227 7332 7438 7543 7649 680 1419 Percent of Gain 2.21% 2.15% 2.31% 0.86% 1.37% 1.55% 1.53% 1.51% 1.48% 1.46% 1.44% 1.42% 1.40% Pupil Gain 138 137 150 57 92 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 TABLE K - 5 PROJECTIONS 3E.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 K 1029 1017 1061 1104 1123 1 1068 1080 1068 1112 1155 1173 2 1097 1077 1088 1077 1120 1163 1182 3 996 1111 1091 1102 1091 1135 1178 1196 4 1022 1021 1136 1116 1128 1116 1160 1203 1221 5 1018 1040 1039 1154 1133 1145 1134 1177 1220 1239 4 year K - 5 TOT 6230 6346 6483 6665 6750 520 Percent of Gain 1.86% 2.17% 2.80% 1.27% Pupil Gain 116 138 182 85 TABLE K - 5 PROJECTIONS 3E.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 KDG 1029 1017 1061 1104 1123 1 1068 1072 1060 1104 1147 1165 2 1097 1080 1084 1072 1116 1159 1177 3 996 1106 1089 1093 1082 1125 1168 1187 4 1022 1027 1137 1120 1124 1112 1156 1199 1218 5 1018 1036 1041 1152 1135 1138 1127 1171 1214 1232 4 year K - 5 TOT 6230 6339 6473 6645 6726 496 Percent of Gain 1.75% 2.12% 2.66% 1.21% Pupil Gain 109 134 172 80 prj11-12 Page 7 October 2011 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2011 TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.13 Based on 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 6 1063 1027 1049 1048 1163 1143 1155 1170 1185 1200 1215 1230 1245 1260 7 1032 1074 1039 1060 1059 1174 1154 1166 1181 1196 1211 1226 1241 1256 8 1046 1042 1084 1048 1070 1069 1184 1164 1175 1190 1205 1220 1235 1250 6 year 13 year 6 - 8 TOT 3141 3143 3171 3157 3292 3386 3493 3499 3541 3586 3631 3676 3721 3766 352 625 Percent of Gain 0.07% 0.89% (0.47)% 4.31% 2.85% 3.14% 0.18% 1.19% 1.27% 1.26% 1.24% 1.22% 1.21% Pupil Gain 2 28 (15) 136941066 424545454545 TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.6 Based on 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 6 1063 1016 1034 1039 1149 1132 1136 1154 1171 1189 1206 1224 1242 1259 7 1032 1076 1028 1047 1052 1162 1145 1149 1166 1184 1201 1219 1237 1254 8 1046 1041 1084 1037 1055 1060 1171 1154 1157 1175 1193 1210 1228 1245 6 year 13 year 6 - 8 TOT 3141 3132 3147 3123 3256 3354 3451 3456 3495 3548 3600 3653 3706 3759 310 618 Percent of Gain (0.29)% .47% -.77% 4.28% 3.01% 2.90% .13% 1.13% 1.51% 1.49% 1.47% 1.45% 1.42% Pupil Gain (9) 15 (24) 13498974 395353535353 TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 6 1063 1027 1049 1048 1163 1143 1155 1143 1187 1230 1248 7 1032 1074 1039 1060 1059 1174 1154 1166 1154 1198 1241 1259 8 1046 1042 1084 1048 1070 1069 1184 1164 1175 1164 1208 1251 1269 6 year 10 year 6 - 8 TOT 3141 3143 3171 3157 3292 3386 3493 3472 3516 3592 3697 352 556 Percent of Gain 0.07% 0.89% (0.47)% 4.31% 2.85% 3.14% (0.58)% 1.27% 2.14% 2.93% Pupil Gain 2 28 (15) 136 94 106 (20) 44 75 105 TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 6 1063 1016 1034 1039 1149 1132 1136 1124 1168 1211 1230 7 1032 1076 1028 1047 1052 1162 1145 1149 1137 1181 1224 1242 8 1046 1041 1084 1037 1055 1060 1171 1154 1157 1146 1190 1233 1251 6 year 10 year 6 - 8 TOT 3141 3132 3147 3123 3256 3354 3451 3427 3463 3538 3643 310 502 Percent of Gain (0.29)% 0.47% (0.77)% 4.28% 3.01% 2.90% (0.71)% 1.05% 2.17% 2.97% Pupil Gain (9) 15 (24) 134 98 97 (25) 36 75 105 prj11-12 Page 8 October 2011 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2011 TABLE SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH.13 Based on 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 9 1273 1332 1328 1370 1334 1356 1355 1470 1450 1462 1477 1492 1507 1522 10 1170 1201 1260 1256 1298 1263 1284 1283 1399 1378 1390 1405 1420 1435 11 1233 1090 1121 1180 1176 1218 1182 1204 1203 1318 1298 1309 1324 1339 12 1316 1190 1047 1078 1137 1133 1175 1139 1161 1160 1275 1255 1266 1281 6 year 13 year 9-12 TOT 4992 4813 4756 4884 4945 4969 4997 5097 5212 5318 5439 5460 5517 5577 5 585 Percent of Gain (3.59)% (1.19)% 2.70% 1.26% 0.48% 0.55% 2.01% 2.26% 2.03% 2.28% 0.39% 1.04% 1.09% Pupil Gain (179) (57) 128 61 24 27 100 115 106 121 21 57 60 TABLE SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH.6 Based on 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 9 1273 1253 1248 1291 1244 1262 1267 1378 1361 1364 1382 1400 1417 1435 10 1170 1271 1251 1245 1289 1242 1260 1265 1375 1358 1362 1379 1397 1415 11 1233 1139 1239 1219 1214 1257 1210 1228 1233 1344 1327 1330 1348 1366 12 1316 1244 1149 1250 1230 1225 1268 1221 1239 1244 1354 1337 1341 1359 6 year 13 year 9-12 TOT 4992 4906 4887 5005 4976 4986 5005 5091 5208 5310 5425 5447 5503 5574 13 582 Percent of Gain (1.73)% (0.39)% 2.43% (0.58)% 0.19% 0.39% 1.72% 2.29% 1.96% 2.16% 0.41% 1.04% 1.28% Pupil Gain (86) (19) 119 (29) 9 20 86 117 102 115 22 57 70 TABLE SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 9 1273 1332 1328 1370 1334 1356 1355 1470 1450 1462 1450 1494 1537 1555 10 1170 1201 1260 1256 1298 1263 1284 1283 1399 1378 1390 1378 1422 1465 11 1233 1090 1121 1180 1176 1218 1182 1204 1203 1318 1298 1309 1298 1342 12 1316 1190 1047 1078 1137 1133 1175 1139 1161 1160 1275 1255 1266 1255 6 year 13 year 9-12 TOT 4992 4813 4756 4884 4945 4969 4997 5097 5212 5318 5413 5436 5523 5617 5 625 Percent of Gain (3.59)% (1.19)% 2.70% 1.26% 0.48% 0.55% 2.01% 2.26% 2.03% 1.78% 0.43% 1.60% 1.69% Pupil Gain (179) (57) 128 61 24 27 100 115 106 95 23 87 94 TABLE SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 9 1273 1253 1248 1291 1244 1262 1267 1378 1361 1364 1353 1397 1440 1458 10 1170 1271 1251 1245 1289 1242 1260 1265 1375 1358 1362 1350 1394 1437 11 1233 1139 1239 1219 1214 1257 1210 1228 1233 1344 1327 1330 1319 1363 12 1316 1244 1149 1250 1230 1225 1268 1221 1239 1244 1354 1337 1341 1330 6 year 13 year 9-12 TOT 4992 4906 4887 5005 4976 4986 5005 5091 5208 5310 5395 5415 5494 5587 13 595 Percent of Gain (1.73)% (0.39)% 2.43% (0.58)% 0.19% 0.39% 1.72% 2.29% 1.96% 1.61% 0.35% 1.46% 1.70% Pupil Gain (86) (19) 119 (29) 9 20 86 117 102 86 19 79 94 prj11-12 Page 9 October 2011 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2011 TABLE PROJECTION COMPARISONS 4 BY GRADE GROUP KINDERGARTEN ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 6 year 13 year E.13 1029 1044 1059 1074 1089 1104 1119 1134 1149 1164 1179 1194 1209 1224 90 195 E.6 1029 1047 1064 1082 1099 1117 1135 1152 1170 1187 1205 1223 1240 1258 106 229 E.13A 1029 1017 1061 1104 1123 E.6A 1029 1017 1061 1104 1123 GRD 1 -- GRD 5 ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 6 year 13 year E.13 5201 5328 5449 5585 5621 5693 5768 5843 5918 5993 6068 6143 6218 6293 567 1092 E.6 5201 5321 5441 5573 5613 5687 5775 5863 5951 6039 6127 6215 6303 6391 574 1190 E.13A 5201 5328 5422 5561 5627 E.6A 5201 5321 5412 5541 5603 GRD 6 -- GRD 8 ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 6 year 13 year MS.13 3141 3143 3171 3157 3292 3386 3493 3499 3541 3586 3631 3676 3721 3766 352 625 MS.6 3141 3132 3147 3123 3256 3354 3451 3456 3495 3548 3600 3653 3706 3759 310 618 MS.13A 3141 3143 3171 3157 3292 3386 3493 3472 3516 3592 3697 MS.6A 3141 3132 3147 3123 3256 3354 3451 3427 3463 3538 3643 GRD 9 -- GRD 12 ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 6 year 13 year SH.13 4992 4813 4756 4884 4945 4969 4997 5097 5212 5318 5439 5460 5517 5577 5 585 SH.6 4992 4906 4887 5005 4976 4986 5005 5091 5208 5310 5425 5447 5503 5574 13 582 SH.13A 4992 4813 4756 4884 4945 4969 4997 5097 5212 5318 5413 5436 5523 5617 5 625 SH.6A 4992 4906 4887 5005 4976 4986 5005 5091 5208 5310 5395 5415 5494 5587 13 595 DISTRICT TOTALS ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 6 year 13 year 3.13 14363 14328 14435 14700 14948 15153 15376 15573 15820 16061 16317 16473 16665 16860 1013 2497 3.6 14363 14406 14538 14783 14945 15144 15366 15562 15824 16084 16357 16538 16753 16981 1003 2618 3.13A 14363 14302 14411 14706 14988 3.6A 14363 14377 14506 14773 14958 prj11-12 Page 10 October 2011 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2011 TABLE PROJECTION COMPARISONS 5 BY GRADE GROUP Total = October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Prj 3.13 - 13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase Diff = Number Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase % = Percent Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Prj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Grades 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 K - 5 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % ACTUAL 5856 xxx xxx 5844 xxx xxx 5914 xxx xxx 5741 xxx xxx 5774 xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 5778 (78) (1.33)% 5811 (33) (0.54)% 5827 (87) 3.15% 5723 (18) (0.31)% 5655 (119) (2.06)% Prj 3E.6 5735 (121) (2.07)% 5664 (180) (0.96)% 5802 (112) 2.74% 5735 (6) (0.10)% 5662 (112) (1.94)% Prj 3E.13A 5811 (45) (0.77)% 5919 75 (2.64)% 5839 (75) 1.51% 5743 2 0.03% 5605 (169) (2.93)% Prj 3E.6A 5785 (71) (1.21)% 5895 51 (2.93)% 5831 (83) 1.15% 5776 35 0.61% 5631 (143) (2.48)% Grades 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 6 - 8 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % ACTUAL 2970 xxx xxx 2980 xxx xxx 3049 xxx xxx 3151 xxx xxx 3294 xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 2927 (43) (1.45)% 3023 43 (2.64)% 3025 (80) (2.62)% 3185 34 1.08% 3214 (80) (2.43)% Prj 3E.6 2895 (75) (2.53)% 3009 29 (2.70)% 3011 (75) (2.46)% 3192 41 1.30% 3216 (78) (2.37)% Prj 3E.13A 2927 (43) (1.45)% 3023 43 (2.64)% 3025 (80) (2.62)% 3185 34 1.08% 3214 (80) (2.43)% Prj 3E.6A 2895 (75) (2.53)% 3009 29 (2.70)% 3011 (75) (2.46)% 3192 41 1.30% 3216 (78) (2.37)% Grades 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 9 - 12 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % ACTUAL 4225 xxx xxx 4311 xxx xxx 4498 xxx xxx 4535 xxx xxx 4634 xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 4301 76 1.80% 4369 58 2.74% 4455 (43) (0.32)% 4577 42 0.93% 4630 (4) (0.09)% Prj 3E.6 4313 88 2.08% 4394 83 1.51% 4476 (22) (1.49)% 4594 59 1.30% 4639 5 0.11% Prj 3E.13A 4301 76 1.80% 4369 58 2.74% 4455 (43) (0.32)% 4577 42 0.93% 4630 (4) (0.09)% Prj 3E.6A 4313 88 2.08% 4394 83 1.51% 4476 (22) (1.49)% 4594 59 1.30% 4639 5 0.11% All 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Grades Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % ACTUAL 13051 xxx xxx 13135 xxx xxx 13461 xxx xxx 13427 xxx xxx 13702 xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 13006 (45) (0.34)% 13203 68 0.52% 13307 (154) (0.30)% 13485 58 0.97% 13499 (203) (1.48)% Prj 3E.6 12943 (108) (0.83)% 13067 (68) (0.52)% 13289 (172) (0.82)% 13521 94 0.50% 13517 (185) (1.35)% Prj 3E.13A 13039 (12) (0.09)% 13311 176 1.34% 13319 (142) (1.44)% 13505 78 0.10% 13449 (253) (1.85)% Prj 3E.6A 12993 (58) (0.44)% 13298 163 1.24% 13318 (143) (1.89)% 13562 135 (0.33)% 13486 (216) (1.58)% prj11-12 Page 11 October 2011 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2011 TABLE PROJECTION COMPARISONS 5 BY GRADE GROUP (Continued) Total = October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Prj 3.13 - 13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase Diff = Number Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase % = Percent Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Prj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Grades 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 K - 5 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % ACTUAL 5735 xxx xxx 5887 xxx xxx 6033 xxx xxx 6142 xxx xxx 6198 xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 5761 26 (0.49)% 5750 (137) (2.33)% 5871 (162) (2.69)% 6085 (57) (0.93)% 6179 (19) (0.31)% Prj 3E.6 5821 86 (0.34)% 5795 (92) (1.56)% 5921 (112) (1.86)% 6138 (4) (0.07)% 6237 39 0.63% Prj 3E.13A 5709 (26) (1.24)% 5750 (137) (2.33)% 5869 (164) (2.72)% 6059 (83) (1.35)% 6129 (69) (1.11)% Prj 3E.6A 5756 21 (0.81)% 5784 (103) (1.75)% 5912 (121) (2.01)% 6094 (48) (0.78)% 6172 (26) (0.42)% Grades 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 2007-08 2008-09 6 - 8 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % ACTUAL 3274 xxx xxx 3169 xxx xxx 3144 xxx xxx 3097 xxx xxx 3206 xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 3295 21 (8.86)% 3132 (37) (1.17)% 3131 (13) (0.41)% 3107 10 0.32% 3179 (27) (0.84)% Prj 3E.6 3311 37 (6.06)% 3137 (32) (1.01)% 3146 2 0.06% 3116 19 0.61% 3195 (11) (0.34)% Prj 3E.13A 3295 21 (8.88)% 3132 (37) (1.17)% 3131 (13) (0.41)% 3107 10 0.32% 3179 (27) (0.84)% Prj 3E.6A 3311 37 (6.06)% 3137 (32) (1.01)% 3146 2 0.06% 3116 19 0.61% 3195 (11) (0.34)% Grades 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 2007-08 2008-09 9 - 12 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % ACTUAL 4663 xxx xxx 5032 xxx xxx 5241 xxx xxx 5320 xxx xxx 5299 xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 4783 120 5.90% 4898 (134) (2.66)% 5085 (156) (2.98)% 5190 (130) (2.44)% 5129 (170) (3.21)% Prj 3E.6 4769 106 3.69% 4880 (152) (3.02)% 5086 (155) (2.96)% 5192 (128) (2.41)% 5155 (144) (2.72)% Prj 3E.13A 4783 120 5.90% 4898 (134) (2.66)% 5085 (156) (2.98)% 5190 (130) (2.44)% 5129 (170) (3.21)% Prj 3E.6A 4769 106 3.69% 4880 (152) (3.02)% 5086 (155) (2.96)% 5192 (128) (2.41)% 5155 (144) (2.72)% All 2004-05 2005-06 2003-04 2007-08 2008-09 Grades Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % ACTUAL 13672 xxx xxx 14088 xxx xxx 13672 xxx xxx 14559 xxx xxx 14703 xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 13839 167 1.22% 13780 (308) (2.19)% 13499 (173) (1.27)% 14382 (177) (1.22)% 14487 (216) (1.47)% Prj 3E.6 13901 229 1.67% 13812 (276) (1.96)% 13542 (130) (0.95)% 14446 (113) (0.78)% 14587 (116) (0.79)% Prj 3E.13A 13787 115 0.84% 13780 (308) (2.19)% 13447 (225) (1.65)% 14356 (203) (1.39)% 14437 (266) (1.81)% Prj 3E.6A 13836 164 1.20% 13801 (287) (2.04)% 13510 (162) (1.18)% 14402 (157) (1.08)% 14522 (181) (1.23)% prj11-12 Page 12 October 2011 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2011 TABLE PROJECTION COMPARISONS 5 BY GRADE GROUP (Continued) Total = October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Prj 3.13 - 13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase Diff = Number Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase % = Percent Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Prj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Grades 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Average Average Historical Data is grouped by K - 5 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Diff % K - 5, 6-8, 9-12 articulation ACTUAL 6159 xxx xxx 6208 xxx xxx 6230 xxx xxx xxx xxx pattern. Prj 3E.13 6254 95 1.54% 6282 74 1.19% 6275 45 0.72% (43) (0.46)% Prj 3E.6 6294 135 2.19% 6323 115 1.85% 6267 37 0.59% (36) (0.24)% Articulation pattern has no Prj 3E.13A 6237 78 1.27% 6252 44 0.71% 6266 36 0.58% (47) (0.94)% numeric impact on efficacy Prj 3E.6A 6264 105 1.70% 6269 61 0.98% 6260 30 0.48% (31) (0.71)% of projection models. Grades 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Average Average 6 - 8 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Diff % ACTUAL 3196 xxx xxx 3213 xxx xxx 3141 xxx xxx xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 3242 46 1.44% 3234 21 0.65% 3221 80 2.55% (5) (1.22)% Prj 3E.6 3243 47 1.47% 3236 23 0.72% 3211 70 2.23% (4) (0.96)% Prj 3E.13A 3242 46 1.44% 3234 21 0.65% 3221 80 2.55% (5) (1.22)% Prj 3E.6A 3243 47 1.47% 3236 23 0.72% 3211 70 2.23% (4) (0.96)% Grades 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Average Average 9 - 12 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Diff % ACTUAL 5234 xxx xxx 5061 xxx xxx 4992 xxx xxx xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 5074 (160) (3.06)% 4921 (140) (2.77)% 4901 (91) (1.82)% (44) (0.38)% Prj 3E.6 5128 (106) (2.03)% 5027 (34) (0.67)% 5017 25 0.50% (21) (0.31)% Prj 3E.13A 5074 (160) (3.06)% 4921 (140) (2.77)% 4901 (91) (1.82)% (44) (0.38)% Prj 3E.6A 5129 (105) (2.01)% 5027 (34) (0.67)% 5017 25 0.50% (21) (0.31)% All 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Average Average Grades Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Diff % ACTUAL 14589 xxx xxx 14482 xxx xxx 14363 xxx xxx xxx xxx Prj 3E.13 14570 (19) (0.13)% 14437 (45) (0.31)% 14397 34 0.24% (78) (0.43)% Prj 3E.6 14665 76 0.52% 14586 104 0.72% 14495 132 0.92% (41) (0.32)% Prj 3E.13A 14553 (36) (0.25)% 14407 (75) (0.52)% 14388 25 0.17% (87) (0.65)% Prj 3E.6A 14636 47 0.32% 14532 50 0.35% 14488 125 0.87% (40) (0.47)% prj11-12 Page 13 October 2011 Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-March 2012 BASE DATA - BUILDOUT SCHEDULE Student Generation Factors ASSUMPTIONS: 2012 Auburn Single Multi- 1 Uses Build Out Estimates received from developers. Factors Family Family 2 Student Generation Factors are updated Auburn data for 2012 as allowed per King County Ordinance Elementary 0.2610 0.1720 3 Takes area labeled Lakeland Projects @ 50% and divides across 2012-17 Middle School 0.1300 0.0700 4 Takes area labeled Kersey Project @ 50% divides across 2012-2017 Senior High 0.1340 0.0900 5 Takes area labeled Bridges and other Lea Hill area developments and projects across 2012-2018 Total 0.5250 0.3320 6 Includes known developments in N. Auburn and other non-Lea Hill and non-Lakeland developments (see Development Growth) Table Auburn School Distri 1 Development 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total Lakeland/Kersey Single Family 50 60 70 80 80 80 420 Lea Hill Area Single Family 50 85 100 175 200 200 200 1010 Other Single Family Units 35 40 50 65 65 55 45 355 Total Single Family Units 135 185 220 320 345 335 245 1785 Projected Pupils: Elementary Pupils K-5 35 48 57 84 90 87 64 466 Mid School Pupils 6-8 18 24 29 42 45 44 32 232 Sr. High Pupils 9-12 18 25 29 43 46 45 33 239 Total K-12 71 97 116 168 181 176 129 937 Multi Family Units 25 75 75 100 100 0 0 375 Total Multi Family Units 25 75 75 100 100 0 0 375 Projected Pupils: Elementary Pupils K-54 131317170 0 44 Mid School Pupils 6-8255770011 Sr. High Pupils 9-12 277990025 Total K-12 8 25 25 33 33 0 0 80 Total Housing Units 160 260 295 420 445 335 245 2160 Elementary Pupils K-5 40 61 70 101 107 87 64 530 Mid School Pupils 6-8 19 29 34 49 52 44 32 258 Sr. High Pupils 9-12 20 32 36 52 55 45 33 273 Total K-12 79 122 140 201 214 176 129 1062 Cumulative Projection 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 Elementary - Grades K -5 40 101 171 272 379 466 530 Mid School - Grades 6 - 8 19 49 82 131 183 226 258 Senior High - Grades 9 - 12 20 52 88 140 195 240 273 Total 79 201 342 543 757 933 1062 Buildouts March 12 + ND3.6 ave projections 45 Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-March 2012 TABLE New Projects - Annual New Pupils Added & Distributed 2 by Grade Level 6 Year Percent of average GRADE Average Pupils by Grade 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 Enroll. & Level KDG 1001 6.89% 1029 5 14 24 37 52 64 73 1 1032 7.10% 1068 6 14 24 39 54 66 75 2 1026 7.07% 42.44% 1097 6 14 24 38 54 66 75 3 1013 6.98% 9966 142438536574 4 1045 7.20% 1022 6 14 25 39 54 67 76 5 1045 7.20% 1018 6 14 25 39 55 67 76 6 1051 7.24% 1063 6 15 25 39 55 68 77 7 1054 7.26% 21.81% 1032 6 15 25 39 55 68 77 8 1062 7.31% 1046 6 15 25 40 55 68 78 9 1284 8.84% 1273 7 18 30 48 67 82 94 10 1299 8.95% 35.75% 1170 7 18 31 49 68 83 95 11 1303 8.97% 1233 7 18 31 49 68 84 95 12 1305 8.99% 1316 7 18 31 49 68 84 95 Totals 14519 100.00% Total 14363 79 201 342 543 757 933 1062 TABLE 6 year Historical Data 3 Average Enrollment and Percentage Distributed by Grade Level Grade 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 6yr Ave % KDG 941 996 998 1032 1010 1029 1001.00 6.89% 1 1012 995 1015 1033 1066 1068 1031.50 7.10% 2 1002 1019 1024 998 1016 1097 1026.00 7.07% 3 1031 997 1048 993 1013 996 1013.00 6.98% 4 1049 1057 1044 1073 1024 1022 1044.83 7.20% 5 998 1078 1069 1030 1079 1018 1045.33 7.20% 6 1058 1007 1096 1040 1041 1063 1050.83 7.24% 7 1014 1057 1034 1125 1060 1032 1053.67 7.26% 8 1072 1033 1076 1031 1112 1046 1061.67 7.31% 9 1372 1337 1256 1244 1221 1273 1283.83 8.84% 10 1400 1368 1341 1277 1238 1170 1299.00 8.95% 11 1322 1352 1350 1303 1258 1233 1303.00 8.97% 12 1147 1263 1352 1410 1344 1316 1305.33 8.99% Totals 14418 14559 14703 14589 14482 14363 14519.00 100.00% % of change 0.98% 0.99% -0.78% -0.73% -0.82% change +/- 141 144 (114) (107) (119) Buildouts March 12 + ND3.6 ave projections 46 Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-March 2012 TABLE 4 New Projects - Pupil Projection Cumulative ND 3.13 by Grade Level Updated March 2012 Uses a 'cohort survival' GRADE 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 model assuming 100% of Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected previous year new KDG 1029 1049 1073 1098 1126 1156 1183 1207 enrollees move to the next 1 1068 1085 1109 1134 1163 1194 1221 1245 grade level. 2 1097 1082 1102 1127 1157 1187 1214 1238 3 996 1117 1105 1126 1155 1185 1212 1236 Kindergarten calculates 4 1022 1027 1151 1140 1167 1197 1225 1249 previous years number plus 5 1018 1045 1053 1179 1172 1200 1227 1252 K-5 6230 6406 6593 6804 6941 7118 7283 7428 Current generation based on 6 1063 1033 1063 1073 1203 1198 1222 1246 % of total enrollment. Other 7 1032 1080 1053 1085 1099 1229 1222 1243 factor uses 100% cohort 8 1046 1048 1099 1073 1110 1124 1252 1241 survival, based on 6 year GR 6-8 3141 3161 3215 3231 3411 3551 3696 3730 history. 9 1273 1339 1346 1400 1382 1423 1438 1564 10 1170 1208 1278 1287 1347 1330 1368 1378 11 1233 1097 1139 1211 1224 1286 1266 1299 12 1316 1197 1065 1109 1186 1201 1259 1235 GR 9-12 4992 4841 4828 5006 5139 5240 5330 5476 Total 14363 14408 14636 15041 15491 15910 16309 16634 % of change 0.31% 1.59% 2.77% 2.99% 2.70% 2.51% 1.99% change +/- 45 228 405 450 419 400 325 TABLE 5 New Projects - Pupil Projection Cumulative ND 3.6 by Grade Level Updated March 2012 Uses a 'cohort survival' GRADE 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2018-19 2019-20 model assuming 100% of Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected previous year new KDG 1029 1052 1078 1105 1137 1169 1199 1225 1239 1253 enrollees move to the next 1 1068 1077 1104 1131 1163 1196 1226 1253 1267 1281 grade level. 2 1097 1086 1098 1126 1157 1190 1220 1247 1261 1275 3 996 1112 1103 1117 1149 1181 1211 1238 1252 1266 Kindergarten calculates 4 1022 1033 1152 1145 1163 1196 1226 1253 1267 1282 previous years number plus 5 1018 1042 1056 1176 1174 1193 1223 1250 1264 1279 K-5 6230 6402 6591 6800 6943 7125 7306 7466 7551 7636 Current generation based on 6 1063 1021 1049 1064 1188 1187 1204 1230 1244 1259 % of total enrollment. Other 7 1032 1081 1043 1071 1091 1217 1213 1226 1240 1254 factor uses 100% cohort 8 1046 1046 1099 1062 1095 1116 1239 1231 1245 1259 survival, based on 6 year GR 6-8 3141 3149 3191 3197 3374 3519 3655 3687 3729 3771 history. 9 1273 1260 1265 1322 1292 1329 1350 1471 1488 1505 10 1170 1278 1269 1276 1337 1309 1343 1360 1375 1391 11 1233 1146 1257 1250 1262 1325 1294 1324 1339 1354 12 1316 1251 1167 1281 1279 1293 1352 1316 1331 1346 GR 9-12 4992 4934 4958 5127 5170 5256 5339 5471 5533 5596 Total 14363 14485 14740 15125 15487 15901 16299 16624 16813 17004 % of change 0.85% 1.76% 2.61% 2.40% 2.67% 2.50% 1.99% 1.13% 1.14% change +/- 122 255 385 363 414 398 325 189 191 Buildouts March 12 + ND3.6 ave projections 47 Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-March 2012 TABLE 6 New Developments - Pupil Projection Cumulative 2.11% 1.14% ND3.13A by Grade Level Updated March 2012 Uses a 'cohort survival' GRADE 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 model assuming 100% of Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected previous year new KDG 1029 1023 1075 1128 1160 enrollees move to the next 1 1068 1085 1083 1136 1194 1227 grade level. 2 1097 1082 1102 1101 1159 1217 1248 3 996 1117 1105 1126 1129 1187 1243 1270 Kindergarten calculates 4 1022 1027 1151 1140 1167 1171 1227 1279 birth rate average plus 5 1018 1045 1053 1179 1172 1200 1201 1254 6230 6379 6569 6810 6980 6002 4918 3803 Current generation based on 6 1063 1033 1063 1073 1203 1198 1222 1220 % of total enrollment. Other 7 1032 1080 1053 1085 1099 1229 1222 1243 factor uses 100% cohort 8 1046 1048 1099 1073 1110 1124 1252 1241 survival, based on 6 year 3141 3161 3215 3231 3411 3551 3696 3704 history. 9 1273 1339 1346 1400 1382 1423 1438 1564 10 1170 1208 1278 1287 1347 1330 1368 1378 11 1233 1097 1139 1211 1224 1286 1266 1299 12 1316 1197 1065 1109 1186 1201 1259 1235 4992 4841 4828 5006 5139 5240 5330 5476 Total 14363 14381 14612 15047 15531 % of change 0.13% 1.60% 2.98% 3.21% change +/- 18 231 435 483 TABLE 7 New Projects - Pupil Projection Cumulative ND 3.6A by Grade Level Updated March 2012 Uses a 'cohort survival' GRADE 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 model assuming 100% of Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected previous year new KDG 1029 1023 1075 1128 1160 enrollees move to the next 1 1068 1077 1075 1128 1186 1219 grade level. 2 1097 1086 1098 1096 1154 1213 1243 3 996 1112 1103 1117 1120 1178 1233 1261 Kindergarten calculates 4 1022 1033 1152 1145 1163 1167 1223 1276 birth rate average plus 5 1018 1042 1056 1176 1174 1193 1194 1247 6230 6372 6558 6790 6956 Current generation based on 6 1063 1021 1049 1064 1188 1187 1204 1201 % of total enrollment. Other 7 1032 1081 1043 1071 1091 1217 1213 1226 factor uses 100% cohort 8 1046 1046 1099 1062 1095 1116 1239 1231 survival, based on 6 year 3141 3149 3191 3197 3374 3519 3655 3658 history. 9 1273 1260 1265 1322 1292 1329 1350 1471 10 1170 1278 1269 1276 1337 1309 1343 1360 11 1233 1146 1257 1250 1262 1325 1294 1324 12 1316 1251 1167 1281 1279 1293 1352 1316 4992 4934 4958 5127 5170 5256 5339 5471 Total 14363 14456 14707 15115 15501 % of change 0.65% 1.74% 2.77% 2.55% change +/- 93 252 407 386 Buildouts March 12 + ND3.6 ave projections 48 Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey Auburn School District Development Growth since 1/1/06 March, 2012 SINGLE FAMILY Actual Students Projected Students Units/ Current To Be Student Generation Factors Development Name Parcels Occupancy Occupied Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS Total Alder Meadows 30 30 0 8 5 7 20 0.267 0.167 0.233 0.667 Aspen Meadows 21 21 0 6 5 6 17 0.286 0.238 0.286 0.810 Auburn Place 14 14 0 9 3 3 15 0.643 0.214 0.214 1.071 Cambridge Pointe 26 26 0 11 3 5 19 0.423 0.115 0.192 0.731 Greenacres 16 16 0 2 0 1 3 0.125 0.000 0.063 0.188 Lakeland: The Reserve 80 80 0 25 11 14 50 0.313 0.138 0.175 0.625 Lakeland: Verona North 181 181 0 51 21 17 89 0.282 0.116 0.094 0.492 Marchini Meadows 83 83 0 37 17 11 65 0.446 0.205 0.133 0.783 Pacific View-Meadows 78 78 0 15 14 15 44 0.192 0.179 0.192 0.564 Riverpointe 118 118 0 33 15 18 66 0.280 0.127 0.153 0.559 Sera Monte 33 33 0 3 5 5 13 0.091 0.152 0.152 0.394 Trail Run 169 169 0 22 11 12 45 0.130 0.065 0.071 0.266 Totals 849 849 0 222 110 114 446 0.261 0.130 0.134 0.525 Current Construction to be Occupied 2012 Actual Students Projected Students Units/ Current To Be Student Generation Factors Development Name Parcels Occupancy Occupied Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS Total Beaver Meadows 60 30 30 0 7 8 15 8 4 4 16 Lakeland: East 130 24 106 2 4 5 11 28 14 14 56 Lakeland: Edgeview 373 19 354 2 1 1 4 93 46 48 186 Lakeland: Pinnacle Estates 76 33 43 17 3 4 24 11 6 6 23 Lakeland: Vista Heights 125 117 8 30 14 10 54 2 1 1 4 Monterey Park 174 14 160 2 0 0 2 42 21 21 84 Totals 938 237 701 53 29 28 110 183 91 94 368 50 Auburn School District Development Growth since 1/1/06 March, 2012 2012 and up Projected Students Units/ Current To Be Student Generation Factors Development Name Parcels Occupancy Occupied Elem Middle HS Total Alicia Glenn 31 0 31 8 4 4 16 Anderson Acres 14 0 14 4 2 2 7 Backbone Ridge 7 0 7 2 1 1 4 Brandon Meadows 55 0 55 14 7 7 29 Brandon Place 78 0 78 20 10 10 41 Bridges 386 0 386 101 50 52 203 Bridle Estates 18 0 18 5 2 2 9 Cam-West 99 0 99 26 13 13 52 Carrington Pointe 24 0 24 6 3 3 13 Estes Park 31 0 31 8 4 4 16 Harpreet Kang 8 0 8 2 1 1 4 Hazel Heights 22 0 22 6 3 3 12 Hazel View 20 0 20 5 3 3 11 Kendall Ridge 106 0 106 28 14 14 56 Lakeland: Forest Glen At .. 30 0 30 8 4 4 16 Lakeland: Park Ridge 256 0 256 67 33 34 134 Lawson Place 14 0 14 4 2 2 7 Megan's Meadows 9 0 9 2 1 1 5 Mountain View Estates 37 0 37 10 5 5 19 New Hope Lutheran Plat 8 0 8 2 1 1 4 Pacific Lane 11 0 11 3 1 1 6 Ridge At Tall Timbers 104 0 104 27 13 14 55 Sterling Court 8 0 8 2 1 1 4 Spencer Place 13 0 13 3 2 2 7 Stipps Plat 29 0 29 8 4 4 15 Vintage Place 25 0 25 7 3 3 13 Willow Place 18 0 18 5 2 2 9 Yates Plat 16 0 16 4 2 2 8 1477 1477 Totals 2012 and up 386 191 198 776 Grand Totals 570 282 292 1144 51 Auburn School District Development Growth since 1/1/06 March, 2012 Multi-Family 2012 MULTI FAMILY Student Generation Factors Units/ Current To Be Development Name Parcels OccupancyOccupied Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS Total Butte Estates 29 29 0 7 2 2 11 0.241 0.069 0.069 0.379 Cox/Woodward TH 8 8 0 4 2 5 11 0.500 0.250 0.625 1.375 Lakeland: Carrara 170 170 0 10 1 5 16 0.059 0.006 0.029 0.094 Lakeland: Madera 70 70 0 3 0 0 3 0.043 0.000 0.000 0.043 Lakeland: Palermo Apts 362 362 0 33 15 26 74 0.091 0.041 0.072 0.204 Lakeland: Sorano 79 79 0 3 2 2 7 0.038 0.025 0.025 0.089 Legend Townhomes 11 11 0 2 1 1 4 0.182 0.091 0.091 0.364 Pacific Ave Duplexes 12 12 0 5 0 1 6 0.417 0.000 0.083 0.500 Pasa Fino II 19 19 0 1 0 0 1 0.053 0.000 0.000 0.053 Seasons at Lea Hill Village 332 332 0 111 52 53 216 0.334 0.157 0.160 0.651 1207 1092 15 188 76 98 362 0.172 0.070 0.090 0.332 Monterey Park Townhomes 65 9 56 0 0 0 0 10 4 5 19 Trail Run Townhomes 115 100 15 9 1 3 13 3 1 1 5 180 109 71 Total Under Construction 12 5 6 24 2012 and beyond Auburn Hills Apt/TH 205 0 205 35 14 18 68 "D" Street Plat 32 0 32 6 2 3 11 Lakeland: Four Lakes Apts 234 0 234 40 16 21 78 Sundallen Condos 48 0 48 8 3 4 16 519 519 Total to be Constructed 89 36 47 172 Total to be Occupied 102 41 53 196 52 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 RESOLUTION NO. 1156 RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN WHEREAS, Auburn School District No. 408 (the "District") desires to cooperate with King County, and the Cities of Algona, Auburn, Black Diamond, Kent, and Pacific in implementing the Growth Management Act (the "GMA"); and WHEREAS, the District shall submit the District's 2012 Capital Facilities Plan to King County, and the Cities of Algona, Auburn, Black Diamond, Kent, and Pacific for adoption and incorporation into each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the GMA authorizes local jurisdictions to collect school impact fees from development in order to ensure that school facilities are available to serve new growth and development; and WHEREAS, the District's projected student enrollment is expected to increase over the next six years; and WHEREAS, the District will need to build new schools, acquire school sites and develop additional capacity in order to serve the increasing student enrollment; and WHEREAS, existing funding sources are not sufficient to fund the capital improvements needed to serve the District's projected enrollment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The Auburn School District No. 408 hereby adopts the District's 2012 Capital Facilities Plan. 2. The District shall submit this Plan to King County, and the Cities of Algona, Auburn, Black Diamond, Kent, and Pacific for adoption and incorporation into each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan. 3. The District will request the adoption of school impact fees for the District by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent. 4. The Board supports the development of GMA school impact fee programs by the Cities of Algona, Black Diamond and Pacific. ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of Auburn School District No. 408, King County, Washington, at an open public meeting thereof, notice of which was given as required by law, held this 29th day of May, 2012, the following Directors being present and voting therefore. ADOPTED this 29th day of May, 2012. BOARD OF DIRECTORS AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408 ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ATTEST: ______Secretary to the Board 12CP Resolution