Nlp Neuro Linguistic Programming Pdf

Nlp neuro linguistic programming pdf Continue Not to be confused with natural language processing (also NLP). Neuro-linguistic programmingMeSHD020557[edit on Wikidata] NLP Topics Methods Rep. systems Covert hypnosis Developers Richard Bandler John Grinder Notable practitioners Connirae Andreas Steve Andreas Charles Faulkner Fazal Inayat-Khan Paul McKenna Tony Robbins Organisations Association for Neuro Linguistic Programming vte Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) is a pseudoscientific approach to communication, personal development, and psychotherapy created by Richard Bandler and John Grinder in California, United States In the 1970s, the creators of NLP argue that there is a link between neurological processes (neuro),, language (linguistic) and behavioral patterns learned based on experience (programming) and that they can be changed to achieve specific goals in life. Bandler and Grinder also argue that the NLP methodology can model the skills of exceptional people, allowing anyone to acquire these skills. They also claim that, often during a single session, NLP can treat problems such as phobias, depression, tick disorders, psychosomatic diseases, myopia, allergies, colds, and learning disorders. NLP has been accepted by some hypnotherapists as well as companies that conduct seminars that run seminars that are trained in leadership for businesses and government agencies. There is no scientific evidence to support the claims of NLP defenders and they have been discredited as pseudoscience. Scientific reviews say that NLP is based on outdated metaphors of how the brain works, which are incompatible with current neurological theory and contain numerous factual errors. The reviews also showed that all supporting NLP studies contained significant methodological deficiencies and that there were three times as many much higher-quality studies that failed to reproduce the extraordinary claims made by Bandler, Grinder and other NLP practitioners. Early development According to Bandler and Grinder, NLP includes a methodology such as modeling as well as a set of methods that they received from their initial applications. From such methods, which are considered to be fundamental, they were derived from the work of Virginia Satyr, Milton Erickson and Fritz Pearls. Bandler and Grinder also relied on the theories of Gregory Bateson, Alfred Korzybski and Noam Chomsky (particularly transformational grammar), as well as the ideas and techniques of Carlos Castaneda. Bandler and Grinder argue that their methodology can codify the structure inherent in the therapeutic magic performed in the therapy of Pearls, Satire and Erickson, and is truly inherent in any complex human activity, and then from this codification, the structure and its activities can be studied by others. Their book The Structure of Magic I: A Book of Language and is designed to codify the therapeutic methods of Pearls and Satir. Bandler and Grinder say they used their own modeling process to model Virginia Satyr so they could produce what they called the Meta-Model, a model for gathering information and challenging the customer's language and underlying thinking. They argue that by challenging language distortions, generalizing and restoring remote information in the client's statements, the transformational grammatical concepts of the superficial structure provide a more complete picture of the underlying underlying structure and therefore have therapeutic benefits. Also derived from Satir were anchor, future rates and representative systems. By contrast, Milton-Model - a model of Milton Erickson's supposedly hypnotic language - was described by Bandler and Grinder as artfully vague and metaphorical. Milton-Model is used in conjunction with Meta-Model as a softener to trigger trans and deliver an indirect therapeutic offering. However, associate professor of linguistics, Karen Stolznow, describes Bandler and Grinder's reference to experts such as the named. In addition to Satire, the people they call influences did not cooperate with Bandler or Grinder. Chomsky himself has nothing to do with NLP; his original work was conceived as a theory, not a therapy. Stolsnov writes: In addition to the terminology of borrowing, NLP has no true resemblance to any of The theories or philosophies of Khomsky - linguistic, cognitive or political. According to Andre Muller Weitzenhoffer, a researcher in the field of hypnosis, the main weakness of the linguistic analysis of Bandler and Grinder is that most of it is built on unverified hypotheses and supported by completely inadequate data. Weitzenhoffer adds that Bandler and Grinder abuse officially logic and mathematics, 29 redefine or misunderstand terms from the lexicon of linguistics (e.g. nominalization),30 create a scientific facade for granted complicating Erickson's notions with unsubstantiated claims, most recently (circa 1997) Bandler stated: NLP is based on figuring out what works. In order to formalize patterns, I used everything from linguistics to holography... The models that make up NLP are all formal models based on mathematical, logical principles such as the calculus of predicates and mathematical equations underlying holography. However, there is no mention of the mathematics of holography, nor of holography in general in McClendon's Spitzer, or of Grinder's account of the development of NLP. On the development of NLP Grinder recalls: My memories of what we thought at the time The discovery (in relation to the classic code we developed - that is, years 1973 to 1978) was that we were quite explicit that we were out to overthrow the paradigm, and that, for example, I, for one, was very helpful in planning this campaign, using in part as a guide to the excellent work of Thomas Kuhn (The Structure of Scientific Revolutions), in which he detailed some of the conditions that historically got in the midst of the paradigm. For example, I find it very useful that none of us was qualified in the field we first went after - psychology and in particular its therapeutic application; this is one of the conditions that Kuhn defined in his historical study of paradigm shifts. Philosopher Robert Todd Carroll replied that Grinder did not understand Coon's text on the history and philosophy of science, the structure of scientific revolutions. Carroll replies: a) individual scientists never have and are never able to create paradigm shifts of will and Kuhn does not suggest otherwise; (b) The Cunha text does not suggest that unqualified science is a prerequisite for a result that requires a paradigm shift in this area, and (c) The structure of scientific revolutions is primarily a work of history, not an instructive text to create paradigm shifts, and such a text is not possible - an extraordinary discovery is not a formulaic procedure. Carroll explains that paradigm change is not a planned activity, but rather the result of scientific efforts within the current (dominant) paradigm that produces data that cannot be adequately accounted for within the current paradigm, hence a paradigm shift, i.e. the adoption of a new paradigm. In the development of NLP, Bandler and Grinder did not respond to the paradigmatic crisis in psychology and did not produce any data that caused the paradigmatic crisis in psychology. There is no point in The Bandler and Grinder calling or participating in a paradigm shift. What Grinder and Bandler have done makes it impossible to continue the psychology... not taking their ideas? Nothing, Carroll said. Commercialization and evaluation by the late 1970s, the human movement turned into an industry and provided a market for some NLP ideas. At the center of this growth was the Esalen Institute in Big Sur, California. Pearls led numerous gestalt therapy seminars in Esalen. Satir was one of the first leaders, and Bateson was a visiting teacher. Bandler and Grinder argued that in addition to being a therapeutic method, NLP is also a communication study and began using it as a business tool, arguing that if anyone can do anything, then you can. After 150 students paid $1,000 each for a ten-day seminar in Santa Cruz, California, Bandler and Grinder from academic writing and prepared prepared books from seminar transcripts such as Frogs in Princes, which sold more than 270,000 copies. According to court documents related to the intellectual property dispute between Bandler and Grinder, Bandler paid more than $800,000 in 1980 to sell workshops and books. The community of psychotherapists and students began to form around The Initial Works of Bandler and Grinder, which led to the growth and spread of NLP as a theory and practice. For example, Tony Robbins trained with Grinder and used several ideas from NLP as part of his own self-help and motivational speeches. Bandler made several unsuccessful attempts to exclude other parties from the NLP. Meanwhile, a growing number of practitioners and theorists have led to the fact that NLP has become even less homogeneous than it was at its core. Prior to the decline of NLP, scientific researchers began empirically testing its theoretical foundations, indicating a lack of empirical support for major NLP theories. The 1990s were characterized by fewer scientific studies evaluating NLP methods than the previous decade. Tomasz Witkowski attributes this to a decrease in interest in the debate due to the lack of empirical support for NLP from its supporters. The main components and basic concepts of NLP can be understood from the point of view of three broad components and central concepts

Load more