Nlp neuro linguistic programming pdf

Continue Not to be confused with natural language processing (also NLP). Neuro-linguistic programmingMeSHD020557[edit on Wikidata] NLP Topics Methods Rep. systems Covert hypnosis Developers Richard Bandler John Grinder Notable practitioners Connirae Andreas Steve Andreas Charles Faulkner Fazal Inayat-Khan Paul McKenna Tony Robbins Organisations Association for Neuro Linguistic Programming vte Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) is a pseudoscientific approach to communication, personal development, and psychotherapy created by Richard Bandler and John Grinder in California, United States In the 1970s, the creators of NLP argue that there is a link between neurological processes (neuro),, language (linguistic) and behavioral patterns learned based on experience (programming) and that they can be changed to achieve specific goals in life. Bandler and Grinder also argue that the NLP methodology can model the skills of exceptional people, allowing anyone to acquire these skills. They also claim that, often during a single session, NLP can treat problems such as phobias, depression, tick disorders, psychosomatic diseases, myopia, allergies, colds, and learning disorders. NLP has been accepted by some hypnotherapists as well as companies that conduct seminars that run seminars that are trained in leadership for businesses and government agencies. There is no scientific evidence to support the claims of NLP defenders and they have been discredited as pseudoscience. Scientific reviews say that NLP is based on outdated metaphors of how the brain works, which are incompatible with current neurological theory and contain numerous factual errors. The reviews also showed that all supporting NLP studies contained significant methodological deficiencies and that there were three times as many much higher-quality studies that failed to reproduce the extraordinary claims made by Bandler, Grinder and other NLP practitioners. Early development According to Bandler and Grinder, NLP includes a methodology such as modeling as well as a set of methods that they received from their initial applications. From such methods, which are considered to be fundamental, they were derived from the work of Virginia Satyr, Milton Erickson and Fritz Pearls. Bandler and Grinder also relied on the theories of Gregory Bateson, Alfred Korzybski and Noam Chomsky (particularly transformational grammar), as well as the ideas and techniques of Carlos Castaneda. Bandler and Grinder argue that their methodology can codify the structure inherent in the therapeutic magic performed in the therapy of Pearls, Satire and Erickson, and is truly inherent in any complex human activity, and then from this codification, the structure and its activities can be studied by others. Their book The Structure of Magic I: A Book of Language and is designed to codify the therapeutic methods of Pearls and Satir. Bandler and Grinder say they used their own modeling process to model Virginia Satyr so they could produce what they called the Meta-Model, a model for gathering information and challenging the customer's language and underlying thinking. They argue that by challenging language distortions, generalizing and restoring remote information in the client's statements, the transformational grammatical concepts of the superficial structure provide a more complete picture of the underlying underlying structure and therefore have therapeutic benefits. Also derived from Satir were anchor, future rates and representative systems. By contrast, Milton-Model - a model of Milton Erickson's supposedly hypnotic language - was described by Bandler and Grinder as artfully vague and metaphorical. Milton-Model is used in conjunction with Meta-Model as a softener to trigger trans and deliver an indirect therapeutic offering. However, associate professor of linguistics, Karen Stolznow, describes Bandler and Grinder's reference to experts such as the named. In addition to Satire, the people they call influences did not cooperate with Bandler or Grinder. Chomsky himself has nothing to do with NLP; his original work was conceived as a theory, not a therapy. Stolsnov writes: In addition to the terminology of borrowing, NLP has no true resemblance to any of The theories or philosophies of Khomsky - linguistic, cognitive or political. According to Andre Muller Weitzenhoffer, a researcher in the field of hypnosis, the main weakness of the linguistic analysis of Bandler and Grinder is that most of it is built on unverified hypotheses and supported by completely inadequate data. Weitzenhoffer adds that Bandler and Grinder abuse officially logic and mathematics, 29 redefine or misunderstand terms from the lexicon of linguistics (e.g. nominalization),30 create a scientific facade for granted complicating Erickson's notions with unsubstantiated claims, most recently (circa 1997) Bandler stated: NLP is based on figuring out what works. In order to formalize patterns, I used everything from linguistics to holography... The models that make up NLP are all formal models based on mathematical, logical principles such as the calculus of predicates and mathematical equations underlying holography. However, there is no mention of the mathematics of holography, nor of holography in general in McClendon's Spitzer, or of Grinder's account of the development of NLP. On the development of NLP Grinder recalls: My memories of what we thought at the time The discovery (in relation to the classic code we developed - that is, years 1973 to 1978) was that we were quite explicit that we were out to overthrow the paradigm, and that, for example, I, for one, was very helpful in planning this campaign, using in part as a guide to the excellent work of Thomas Kuhn (The Structure of Scientific Revolutions), in which he detailed some of the conditions that historically got in the midst of the paradigm. For example, I find it very useful that none of us was qualified in the field we first went after - psychology and in particular its therapeutic application; this is one of the conditions that Kuhn defined in his historical study of paradigm shifts. Philosopher Robert Todd Carroll replied that Grinder did not understand Coon's text on the history and philosophy of science, the structure of scientific revolutions. Carroll replies: a) individual scientists never have and are never able to create paradigm shifts of will and Kuhn does not suggest otherwise; (b) The Cunha text does not suggest that unqualified science is a prerequisite for a result that requires a paradigm shift in this area, and (c) The structure of scientific revolutions is primarily a work of history, not an instructive text to create paradigm shifts, and such a text is not possible - an extraordinary discovery is not a formulaic procedure. Carroll explains that paradigm change is not a planned activity, but rather the result of scientific efforts within the current (dominant) paradigm that produces data that cannot be adequately accounted for within the current paradigm, hence a paradigm shift, i.e. the adoption of a new paradigm. In the development of NLP, Bandler and Grinder did not respond to the paradigmatic crisis in psychology and did not produce any data that caused the paradigmatic crisis in psychology. There is no point in The Bandler and Grinder calling or participating in a paradigm shift. What Grinder and Bandler have done makes it impossible to continue the psychology... not taking their ideas? Nothing, Carroll said. Commercialization and evaluation by the late 1970s, the human movement turned into an industry and provided a market for some NLP ideas. At the center of this growth was the Esalen Institute in Big Sur, California. Pearls led numerous gestalt therapy seminars in Esalen. Satir was one of the first leaders, and Bateson was a visiting teacher. Bandler and Grinder argued that in addition to being a therapeutic method, NLP is also a communication study and began using it as a business tool, arguing that if anyone can do anything, then you can. After 150 students paid $1,000 each for a ten-day seminar in Santa Cruz, California, Bandler and Grinder from academic writing and prepared prepared books from seminar transcripts such as Frogs in Princes, which sold more than 270,000 copies. According to court documents related to the intellectual property dispute between Bandler and Grinder, Bandler paid more than $800,000 in 1980 to sell workshops and books. The community of psychotherapists and students began to form around The Initial Works of Bandler and Grinder, which led to the growth and spread of NLP as a theory and practice. For example, Tony Robbins trained with Grinder and used several ideas from NLP as part of his own self-help and motivational speeches. Bandler made several unsuccessful attempts to exclude other parties from the NLP. Meanwhile, a growing number of practitioners and theorists have led to the fact that NLP has become even less homogeneous than it was at its core. Prior to the decline of NLP, scientific researchers began empirically testing its theoretical foundations, indicating a lack of empirical support for major NLP theories. The 1990s were characterized by fewer scientific studies evaluating NLP methods than the previous decade. Tomasz Witkowski attributes this to a decrease in interest in the debate due to the lack of empirical support for NLP from its supporters. The main components and basic concepts of NLP can be understood from the point of view of three broad components and central concepts related to these: Subjectivity. According to Bandler and Grinder: We experience the world subjectively, so we create subjective representations of our experience. These subjective representations of experience are made in terms of five senses and language. That is our subjective conscious experience in terms of traditional senses of view, listening, tactileness, olfaction and gustation so that when we, for example, rehearse activities in our heads, recall an event or anticipate the future we will see images, hear sounds, tastes, feel tactile sensations, smell smells and think in some (natural) languages. It is also argued that these subjective perceptions of experience have a distinct structure and regularity. It is in this sense that NLP is sometimes defined as the study of the structure of subjective experience. Behavior can be described and understood in terms of these subjective perceptions based on the sense. Behavior is generally conceived as verbal and nonverbal communication, incompetent, non-adaptive or pathological behavior, as well as effective or skilful behavior. Behavior (in itself and others) can be changed by manipulating these subjective perceptions based on the sense. Consciousness. NLP is based on the fact that consciousness splits into a conscious component and an unconscious component. Those subjective perceptions that take place outside awareness includes what is called the unconscious mind. Training. NLP uses an simulation method of training under the term modeling, which is said to be able to codify and reproduce the experience of an example in any field of activity. An important part of the codification process is to describe the sequence of sensory/linguistic representations of the subjective experience of the example when performing the examination. Methods or a set of Practices Additional information: Methods of neurolinguistic programming eye access card, as shown as an example in Bandler s Grinder's Frogs in Princes (1979). The six directions are visual design, visual feedback, auditory design, auditory feedback, kynesic and auditory internal dialogue. According to one Steinbach study, classical interaction in NLP can be understood from a number of milestones, including understanding, gleaned information on the mental state of the problem and desired goals, the use of specific tools and methods for intervention, and the integration of proposed changes in the client's life. The whole process is guided by the client's non-verbal responses. First, it is the act of establishing and maintaining understanding between practitioner and client, which is achieved by walking and conducting verbal (e.g. sensory predicates and keywords) and nonverbal behavior (e.g. juxtaposition and mirrored nonverbal behavior, or responding to eye movements) of the client. Once an understanding has been established, the practitioner can gather information (e.g. Meta-Model questions) about the client's current status, and help the client determine the desired state or purpose of the interaction. The practitioner pays special attention to verbal and non-verbal responses, as the client determines the current state and desired state and any resources that may be required to bridge the gap. The client is usually advised to consider the consequences of the desired result, as well as how they may affect his personal or professional life and relationships, taking into account any positive intentions of any problems that may arise (i.e. environmental verification). Fourth, the practitioner assists the client in achieving the desired results by using certain tools and techniques to change the inner perceptions and responses to stimuli in the world. Finally, changes occur in the future, helping the client mentally rehearse and integrate changes into his or her life. For example, a customer may be asked to step into the future and imagine (thinking to see, hear and feel) what it is like to achieve the result. According to Stollznow (2010), NLP also includes analysis of fringe discourse and practical guidelines for improved communication. For example, one argues: When you take the word but, people will remember what you said afterwards. In short, people remember what you said before and after. The application of Alternative Medicine NLP has been promoted with claims it can be used to treat a variety of ailments including Parkinson's disease, HIV/AIDS and cancer. Such claims have no supporting medical evidence. People who use NLP as a form of treatment are at risk of serious adverse health consequences as this may delay the provision of effective care. Psychotherapeutic early books about NLP had a psychotherapeutic focus, given that early models were psychotherapists. As an approach to psychotherapy, NLP shares similar basic assumptions and foundations common with some modern concise and systemic practices, such as a solution focused on short therapy. NLP has also been found to have influenced these practices through its reframing techniques, which aim to change behavior by changing its context or meaning, for example by finding positive connotations of thought or behavior. The two main therapeutic uses of NLP are: (1) as supplement therapists practicing in other therapeutic disciplines; (2) as a specific therapy called Neurolinguistic Psychotherapy, which is recognized by the United Kingdom Council for Psychotherapy with accreditation, administered first by the Association of Neurolinguistic Programming, and more recently by its daughter by the neurolinguistic Psychotherapy Organization and the Association of Counselling. Neither neurolinguistic programming nor neurolinguistic psychotherapy are approved by NICE. According to Stollznow (2010), Bandler and Grinder's infamous Frogs in Princes and their other books boast that NLP is a panacea that treats a wide range of physical and mental and learning difficulties, including epilepsy, myopia and dyslexia. With its promises to cure schizophrenia, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder, as well as dismissing mental illness as psychosomatic, NLP shares similarities with Scientology and the Civil Commission on Human Rights (CCHR). A systematic review of Sturt et al (2012) pilot studies concluded that there is no evidence that NLP interventions improve health outcomes. In his review of the NLP, Stephen Briers writes: NLP is not really a cohesive therapy, but a reggae of different methods without a particularly clear theoretical basis... there is almost no evidence base. Eisner writes: NLP seems to have a superficial and gimmicky approach to tackling mental health issues. Unfortunately, NLP appears to be the first in a long line of mass marketing seminars that aim to cure any mental disorder ... NLP does not appear to have empirical or scientific support because fundamental principles of his theory or clinical effectiveness. It remains that mass service psychopablum . Andre Mueller Weitzenhoffer, a friend and colleague of Milton Erickson, wrote: NLP really abstracted and sorted out the essence of successful therapy and provided everyone with the means to be another Whittaker, Virginia Satyr, or Erickson?... The NLP's inability to do so is obvious, because today there are many of their equals, not even another Whittaker, Virginia Satyr or Erickson. Ten years should have been enough time to do so. In this light, I can't take NLP seriously... The contribution of NLP to our understanding and use of Ericxon methods is no less doubtful. Patterns I and II are poorly written works that were overly ambitious, pretentious efforts to reduce hypnosis to the magic of words. Clinical psychologist Stephen Briers questioned the value of the NLP maxim - preposition in NLP jargon - no failure, just feedback. Briers argues that denying the existence of failure diminishes its instructive value. He offers Walt Disney, Isaac Newton and J.K. Rowling as three examples of a uniquely recognized personal failure that triggered great success. According to Briers, it was an accident and burn the type of failure, not the sanitised NLP Rejection Lite, ie the failure of that is not quite the failure of the kind of failure that led these people to success. Briers argues that adherence to maxim leads to self-deprecating. According to Briers, personal efforts are the product of nested values and aspirations and dismissal personally significant failure, as simple feedback effectively denigrates what one values. Briers writes, Sometimes we need to accept and mourn the death of our dreams, not just casually reject them as inconsequential. Briers also argues that NLP's maxim is narcissistic, self-centered and detached from the notions of moral responsibility. Other uses Although the original basic NLP methods were therapeutic in their orientation, their general nature allowed them to be applied in other areas. These applications include persuasion, sales, negotiation, management training, sports, training, coaching, team building and public speaking. Scientific criticism In the early 1980s NLP was touted as an important advance in psychotherapy and counseling, and attracted some interest in consulting research and clinical psychology. However, as controlled trials showed no benefit from NLP, and its supporters made increasingly dubious claims, the scientific interest in NLP disappeared. Numerous literature reviews and meta-analyses have shown no evidence of NLP assumptions and efficacy as a therapeutic method. While some NLP practitioners argue that the lack of empirical support is due to NLP research testing, the consensus scientific opinion is that NLP is pseudoscience and that attempts to reject the results of studies based on these arguments represent an acknowledgement that NLP has no evidence base and that NLP practitioners are seeking post-special authority. Surveys in the academic community have shown that NLP is widely discrediting scientists. Among the reasons for NLP's consideration of pseudoscience is that the evidence in its favor is limited to anecdotes and personal testimony, that it is not informed by the scientific understanding of neuroscience and linguistics, and that the name neuro-linguistic programming uses slang words to impress readers and confuse ideas, while the NLP itself has nothing to do with neural structures and has nothing to do with linguistics. In fact, NLP education was used as a key example of pseudoscience. Sociologists and anthropologists, as quasi-religious sociologists and anthropologists in particular, classified NLP as a quasi-religion belonging to the New Age Movement and/or Human Potential. Medical anthropologist Gene M. Langford classifies NLP as a form of folk magic. i.e. practice with symbolic effectiveness, as opposed to physical efficacy, which is capable of effect changes through non-specific effects (e.g. placebo). For Langford, NLP is akin to the syncretic popular religion, which tries to betray the magic of traditional practice to the science of professional medicine. Bandler and Grinder were influenced by the shamanism described in the books of Carlos Castaneda. Several ideas and methods have been borrowed from Castaneda and incorporated into NLP, including the so-called double induction and the concept of stop the world, which is central to NLP modelling. Tai (1994) describes NLP as a type of psycho shamanism. Fanthorpe and Fanthorpe (2008) see similarities between the mimetic procedure and the intention of NLP modeling and aspects of ritual in some syncretic religions. Hunt (2003) draws a comparison between a care for pedigree from an NLP guru, evident among some NLP supporters, and a concern for the guru's pedigree in some eastern religions. In Aupers and Houtman (2010), Bovbjerg defines NLP as the psycho-religion of the New Age and uses NLP as a case study to demonstrate the thesis that New Age psycho-religious groups such as NLP are based on an unbstentially religious idea, namely the care of a transcendental friend. In the monotheistic denominations of the world, Bovbjerg argues, the purpose of religious practice is to communicate and communicate with the transcendent other, i.e. God. With the New Age of psycho-religions, argues Bovbjerg, this focus on the transcendent of others persists, but another has become others in ourselves, the so-called unconscious: The inner life of man becomes the intangible focus of psycho-religious practices, and the subconscious becomes an integral part of the understanding of I by modern individuals. Bovbjerg adds: In personal development, there would be no sense without the unconscious, which contains hidden resources and hidden knowledge of oneself. Thus, psycho- religious practice revolves around the ideas of the conscious and unconscious me and communication with the hidden resources of the unconscious me - transcendental another. According to Bovbjerg the notion is that we have a self-conscious side of many NLP methods either accurately or implicitly. Bovbjerg states: In particular, the psycho-religious practitioner of NLP expects to achieve self-improvement in the endless transformation of the self. The secular criticism of NLP Bywbjergo is reflected in the conservative Christian perspective of the New Age in the person of Jeremiah (1995), who argues that the transformation recommended by the founders and leaders of these business seminars (such as NLP) has spiritual implications that a non-Christian or new believer may not recognize. The belief that people can change themselves by calling power (or god) inside or their own infinite human potential is a contradiction of the Christian point of view. The Bible says that man is a sinner and is saved only by God's grace. Intellectual property disputes by the end of 1980, the cooperation between Bandler and Grinder ceased. On September 25, 1981, Bandler filed a civil lawsuit against Grinder and his company seeking an injunction and damages for Grinder's commercial activities against NLP. On October 29, 1981, a decision was made in Bandler's favor. As part of the global agreement, Bandler granted Grinder a limited 10-year license to hold NLP seminars, offers certification to NLP and uses the name NLP, provided that royalties from the earnings of the seminars are paid to Bandler. In July 1996 and January 1997, Bandler filed two more civil cases against Grinder and his company, many other prominent NLP figures and 200 other initially unnamed individuals. Bandler sought at least $10,000,000.00 in damages from each defendant. In February 2000, the court ruled against Bandler, stating that Bandler misrepresented to the public, through his licensing agreement and promotional materials, that he is the exclusive owner of all intellectual property rights associated with NLP, and supports authority to determine membership and certification in the NLP Society. In this matter, Stollsnow (2010) commented: In the 1980s, Bandler and Grinder feuded over trademark disputes and theory. Remarkably, none of their many NLP models, pillars and principles have helped these founders resolve their personal and professional conflicts. In December 1997, Tony Clarkson filed a civil suit against Bandler to revoke Bandler's trademark in the UK NLP. The court ruled in Clarkson's favor; Bandler's trademark was subsequently withdrawn. By the end of 2000, Bandler and Grinder entered the release, where they agreed, among other things, that they are co-creators and co-founders of neurolinguistic programming technology and mutually agree to refrain from disparaging each other, at any rate, regarding their respective involvement in neurolinguistic programming. As a result of these disputes and settlements, the names of NLP and neurolinguistic programming do not belong to either party, and there are no restrictions on either party offering NLP certification. The associations, certification and standards of practitioners of NLP and neurolinguistic programming do not belong to any individual or organization, they are not trademarks of intellectual property, and there is no central regulatory body for NLP training and certification. There is no limit to who can describe themselves as an NLP Master Practitioner or NLP Master Coach and there are numerous certifying associations; This led to Devilly (2005) describing such educational and certifying associations as granfaluns, i.e. proud and meaningless associations of people. There is a big difference in the depth and breadth of learning and standards of practitioners, as well as some disagreement between those in this area about which models are or are not actual NLP. NLP is an open training ground without official best practices. With different authors, individual trainers and practitioners their own techniques, concepts and labels, often branding them as NLP, 38 training standards and quality differ greatly. In 2009, the British TV presenter was able to register his pet as a member of the British Council of Neurolinguistic Programming (BBNLP), which subsequently claimed that it exists only to provide benefits to its members, rather than certify credentials. Cm. also Emotional Freedom Technique List unproven and disproved cancer treatment Milton H. Erickson Family Systemic Therapy Frank Farrelly Famous Practices Steve Andreas Richard Bandler John Grinder Paul McKenna Notes and Links - Tosi, Paul; Matheson, Jane. Introduction of neurolinguistic programming Control Center Development, School of Management, University of Surrey. Archive from the original (PDF) dated January 3, 2019. Received on September 12, 2019. Dilts, R., Grinder, D., Delosier, J., Bandler, R. (1980). Neurolinguistic programming: Volume I: Exploring the structure of subjective experience. Cupertino, California: Meta Publications. page 2. ISBN 978-0-916990-07-7.CS1 maint: several names: list of authors (link) - Bandler, Richard; Grinder, John (1975). The Structure of Magic I: A Book about Language and Therapy. Science and Behavior Books Inc. 5-6. ISBN 978-0-8314-0044-6. Bandler, Richard (1993). It's time for a change. Meta Pabs. p. vii. ISBN 978-0-916990-28-2. In single sessions, they can speed up learning, neutralize phobias, enhance creativity, improve relationships, eliminate allergies, and lead firewalks without burning your feet. NLP achieves its goal of creation. We have ways to do what only a genius could have done a decade ago. Pickersgill, Gina. Dr. Richard Bandler on Healing - Special Interview - Gina Pickersgill. NLP life training. The best thing is that you're a corporation. Archive from the original on March 1, 2012. Received on August 8, 2013. GINA: Did I see you demonstrating a technique that some people call Dr. Bandler's beauty treatment? Please tell us about it. RICHARD (BANDLER): Basically what happened is that I noticed that when I hypnotically regressed people repeatedly they looked younger. So I started thinking at first, well there's no way to keep it. I noticed when I hypnotically regressed people under the age of 5 who were now wearing glasses, no need for them to be seen. So I started to leave people's eyes young and grow the rest of them to date, and it would change the recipe of their glasses radically to the point where they could see better. And done enough times, some of them could see without glasses. So I went a little further and did a DHE (Design of Human Engineering™) treatment where we created a mechanism in the back of their mind that repeatedly age regresses them hypnotically; When they sleep when they blink, all kinds of things and state time distortion. And it can take years away from how people look, it also raises their energy level, and in some cases the bi product has had them recovered spontaneously from very serious illnesses. Because they were aged regressed to where before the onset of the disease. Now I can't prove it, but I've seen it enough times that I'm impressed with it. John Grinder; Richard Bandler; Connira Andreas, eds. (1981), Trance-Formations: Neuro-linguistic programming and the structure of hypnosis, Moab, UT: Real People Press, ISBN 978-0-911226-23-2, In Workshop, Bandler and Grinder (1981, p. 166) argued that one NLP session combined with hypnosis can eliminate some vision problems such as vision and cold treatment page 174)... Bandler and Grinder believed that by combining NLP with hypnotic regression, a person not only cured the problem, but also became an amnesty for having it even existed. Thus, after a therapy session, the smoker denied smoking before, even when family and friends insisted otherwise, becoming unable to explain evidence such as nicotine stains. Bandler, Richard (2008). What is NLP? (Advertising video). NLP life. Received on June 1, 2013. We can reliably get rid of the phobia in ten minutes - every time. John Grinder; Bostic St. Clair, Carmen (2001). Chapter 4: The Personal Precursors of NLP. Whisper in the wind. Enterprises J and C. ISBN 978-0-9717223-0-9. Ashley Daulen (January 1, 1996). NLP - help or advertising? Exploring the use of neurolinguistic programming in management training. International Career Development Organization. 1 (1): 27–34. doi:10.1108/13620439610111408. b von Bergen, C. W.; Gary, Barlow Soper; Rosenthal, T.; Wilkinson, Lamar W. (1997). Selected alternative hrD training methods. Human resources development is quarterly. 8 (4): 281–294. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920080403. Thie, Bruce A.; Pignaotti, Monica G. (May 15, 2015). Science and pseudoscience in the practice of social work. Springer Publishing Company. 56-57, 165-167. ISBN 978-0-8261-7769-8. As NLP became more popular, some studies and reviews of such studies concluded that there was no scientific basis for its theories about representative systems and eye movements. a b c Sharpley, Christopher F. (January 1, 1987). Results of neurolinguistic programming research: unsupportive data or unverifiable theory?. In the journal Psychology Counseling. 34 (1): 103–107. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.34.1.103. b c d Witkowski, Tomas (January 1, 2010). Thirty-five years of research in neurolinguistic programming. NLP Research Database. State of art or pseudo-scientific decoration? Polish psychological bulletin. 41 (2). doi:10.2478/v10059-010-0008-0. All this leaves me with the overwhelming impression that the analyzed database of scientific articles is treated in the same way as theatrical design, being the background for the pseudo-scientific farce, which NLP seems to be. The use of scientific attributes, so characteristic of pseudoscience, is evident in other aspects of NLP activity... My analysis leads, no doubt, to the statement that NLP represents pseudoscientific garbage and Druckman, Daniel (November 1, 2004). Be all you can be: improving a person's productivity. In the Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 34 (11): 2234–2260. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb01975.x. a b c d Bandler, Richard; Grinder, John (1975). The Structure of Magic I: A Book about Language and Therapy. Science and Behavior Books Inc. page 6. Isbn John Grinder; Bostic St. Clair, Carmen (2001). Chapter 2: 2: Whisper in the wind. Enterprises J and C. ISBN 978-0-9717223-0-9. Richard Bandler; Grinder, John (1979). Andreas, Steve ( Prince Frogs: Neuro linguistic programming. ISBN 978-0-911226-19-5. a b c d e f Stollznow, Karen (2010). Not very linguistic programming. Skeptic. 15 (4): 7. Received on June 1, 2013. The Awakening, Lisa (2001). Neurolinguistic psychotherapy: postmodern perspective. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-42541-4. a b McClendon, Terrence L. (1989). Wild days. NLP 1972-1981 (1st place). page 41. ISBN 978-0-916990-23-7. In connection with Milton's work, Richard and John also came across Castaneda's books, Don Juan's Teachings, Yaki Lifestyle, Separate Reality and Tales of Power. From there it was the integration of Don Juan using metaphor and hypnosis and Milton Erickson language patterns and metaphors to evoke a altered state of consciousness to create deep trance phenomena. One of the most dynamic methods that evolved from hypnosis programs was the use of double induction. Double induction is a trance induction performed by two people. One person speaks in one ear, using complex words and language patterns to occupy one hemisphere of the brain, while another person speaks in another ear, using children's grammar and language to occupy the other hemisphere of the brain. Sensations are experienced in the same half of the body as the auditory entrance. This method was used in conversations that Carlos Castaneda had with Don Juan and Don Genaro. This method was often used during Richard and John's summing up of the curriculum as a forum for review, following hypnotic suggestions for future applications and learning - b page 6 Bandler and Grinder 1975a. Yorkshire, Heidi (1989). Bandler's method. Mother Jones magazine. 14 (2): 26. ISSN 0362-8841. Received on May 24, 2013. John Grinder, Suzette Elgin (1973). A guide to transformational grammar: history, theory, practice. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN 0-03-080126-5. Reviewed by Frank H. Nuesel Jr. Modern Language Journal, Tom. 58, No 5/6 (September-October 1974), page 282-283 - E. Jane Bradley; Biedermann, Heinz-Joachim (January 1, 1985). The neurolinguistic programming of Bandler and Grinder: its historical context and contribution. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 22 (1): 59–62. doi:10.1037/h0088527. ISSN 0033-3204. OCLC 1588338. a b Spitzer, Robert (1992). Virginia Satire and the Origin of NLP (PDF). Anchor Point Magazine (July): ?. Received on June 5, 2013. John Grinder; Bandler, Richard (1981). Connira Andreas ( e.g. Trans-Education: Neuro-linguistic programming and the structure of hypnosis. Richard; Grinder, John (1985). Annex II. Andreas, Connira. ISBN 978-0-911226-22-5. Muller Weitzenhoffer, Andre (1989). Chapter 8 Erickson Hypnosis: Bandar/Grinder Interpretation. Practice Hypnosis Volume 2: Applying traditional semi-traditional hypnosis. Unconventional hypnosis (1st place). New York: John Wylie and Sons, Inc. 304. ISBN 978-0-471-62168-3. Muller Weitzenhoffer, Andre (1989). Chapter 8 Erickson Hypnosis: Bandar/Grinder Interpretation. Practice Hypnosis Volume 2: Applying traditional semi-traditional hypnosis. Unconventional hypnosis (1st place). New York: John Wylie and Sons, Inc. 300-1. ISBN 978-0-471-62168-3. Muller Weitzenhoffer, Andre (1989). Chapter 8 Erickson Hypnosis: Bandar/Grinder Interpretation. Practice Hypnosis Volume 2: Applying traditional semi-traditional hypnosis. Unconventional hypnosis (1st place). New York: John Wylie and Sons, Inc. 304-5. ISBN 978-0-471-62168-3. I chose the rating to explain that some of the problems in Bandler and Grinder's linguistic approach to Erickson's hypnosis. Almost any other linguistic concept used by these authors could serve equally to show some of their inherent shortcomings in their treatment. Muller Weitzenhoffer, Andre (1989). Chapter 8 Erickson Hypnosis: Bandar/Grinder Interpretation. Practice Hypnosis Volume 2: Applying traditional semi-traditional hypnosis. Unconventional hypnosis (1st place). New York: John Wylie and Sons, Inc. page 307. ISBN 978-0-471-62168-3. As I mentioned in the last chapter, any references to the functions of the left and right brain due to hypnotic phenomena should be considered as ill-founded. They do not add to our understanding, nor our ability to use hypnotic phenomena in the style of Erickson. Indeed, links such as Bandler and Grinder do for these features give their subject a false appearance having more scientific status than it has. Muller Weitzenhoffer, Andre (1989). Chapter 8 Erickson Hypnosis: Bandar/Grinder Interpretation. Practice Hypnosis Volume 2: Applying traditional semi-traditional hypnosis. Unconventional hypnosis (1st place). New York: John Wylie and Sons, Inc. page 306. ISBN 978-0-471-62168-3. This work, BY THES, contains some blatant distortions of facts. For example, Freud and Mesmer were portrayed by contemporaries! Muller Weitzenhoffer, Andre (1989). Chapter 8 Erickson Hypnosis: Bandar/Grinder Interpretation. Practice Hypnosis Volume 2: Applying traditional semi-traditional hypnosis. Unconventional hypnosis (1st place). New York: John Wylie and Sons, Inc. page 306. One of the most striking features of Bandler/Grinder's interpretation is that it somehow ignores the question of the existence and function of suggestion, which even in Erickson's own writings and those that were made with Rossi, is a central idea. Bandler, Richard (1997). NLP Group Workshops - Frequently asked questions. NLP seminars group. NLP seminars group. Archive from the original on June 22, 2013. Received on August 8, 2013. McClendon, Terrence L. (1989). Wild days. NLP 1972-1981 (1st place). ISBN 978-0-916990-23-7. John Grinder; Bostic St. Clair (2001). Whisper in the wind. Enterprises J and C. ISBN 978-0-9717223-0-9. John Grinder (July 1996). 1996 Interview with John Grinder candidate, one of the creators of NLP. Untested. Interview by Chris Collingwood and Collingwood's Jules. Untested. Archive from the original on April 28, 2013. Received on August 8, 2013. a b Carroll, RT (February 23, 2009). neurolinguistic programming (NLP). The dictionary is a skeptic. Received on June 25, 2009. - Heinadi, Christopher; Paul Wilson (December 21, 2010). Social engineering. John Wylie and Sons Inc. ISBN 978-0-470-63953-5. Received on May 24, 2013. Salerno, Steve (2006). Sham: How the self-help movement made America helpless. Crown Publishing Group. ISBN 978-1-4000-5410-7. - b Drukman, Daniel; John A. Father (1988). Improving human productivity: questions, theories and methods. Human resources development is quarterly. 1 (2): 202–206. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920010212. John Grinder; Bandler, Richard (1976). Structure of Magic II (1st California: Science and Behavior Books. p. 3-8. ISBN 978-0-8314-0049-1. Robert Dilts; John Grinder; Richard Bandler; Leslie K. Bandler; DeLozier, Judith (1980). Neurolinguistic Programming: Volume I Exploring the Structure of Subjective Experience (Limited to California: Meta Publications. p. 13-14. ISBN 978-0-916990-07-7. There are three characteristics of an effective pattern in NLP that dramatically distinguish it from behavioral science, as is commonly practiced today. First, in order for the model or generalization of human communication to be acceptable or well formed in NLP, it must include in the description of human agents who initiate and react to the described model, their actions, their possible responses. Second, the description of the pattern should be presented in the sensory-based terms available to the user. This user-centric NLP restriction provides usefulness. We have been constantly struck by the huge gap between theory and practice in behavioral sciences - this requirement closes this gap. Note that because the templates should be presented in touch-based grounded terms available in practice to the user, the template typically has several views, each designed for different sensory capabilities of the individual NLP includes in its descriptive vocabulary terms that are not directly observed (i.e. representative systems) - Dilts, Robert; John Grinder; Richard Bandler; Leslie K. Bandler; DeLozier, Judith (1980). Neurolinguistic Programming: Volume I Exploring the Structure of Subjective Experience (Limited to California: Meta Publications. 7. ISBN 978-0-916990-07-7. Robert Dilts; John Grinder; Richard Bandler; Leslie K. Bandler; DeLozier, Judith (1980). Neurolinguistic Programming: Volume I Exploring the Structure of Subjective Experience (Limited to California: Meta Publications. 36. ISBN 978-0-916990-07-7. The main elements from which human behavior patterns are formed are the systems of perception by which the species act on the environment: vision (vision), listening (hearing), kinestes (body sensations) and olfaction/gustation (smell/taste). The neurolinguistic programming model suggests that all the differences that we as humans are able to make about our environment (internal and external) and our behavior can be usefully represented in terms of these systems. These classes of perception are the structural parameters of human knowledge. We postulate that all of our current experience can be usefully encoded as consisting of some combination of these sensory classes. John Grinder; Bandler, Richard (1977). Patterns of the hypnotic methods of Milton H. Erickson: Volume 2 (1st Ad. Meta Publications. p. 11-19. ISBN 978-1-55552-053-3. L. Michael Hall; Belnap, Barbara. (2000) (1999). Magic Handbook: Comprehensive Guide to NLP Technology (1st Wales: Crown House Publishing Limited. 89-93. ISBN 978-1-899836-22-2. #23 changing the personal history of the template - Hall, L. Michael; Belnap, Barbara. (2000) (1999). Magic Handbook: Comprehensive Guide to NLP Technology (1st Wales: Crown House Publishing Limited. 93-5. ISBN 978-1-899836-22-2. #24 Svish Pattern and Bandler, Richard; Grinder, John (1985). Appendix II Hypnotic language templates: Milton model. Andreas, Connira. ISBN 978-0-911226-22-5. Richard Bandler; Grinder, John (1979). I have a sensual experience. In Andreas, Steve (Prince Frogs: Neurolinguistic Programming (1st place). Utah State: Real People Press. p. 5-78. ISBN 978-0-911226-19-5. L. Michael Hall; Belnap, Barbara. (2000) (1999). Magic Handbook: Comprehensive Guide to NLP Technology (1st Wales: Crown House Publishing Limited. p. 39-40. ISBN 978-1-899836-22-2. #2 walk or match another model of the world and Dilts, Robert; John Grinder; Richard Bandler; Leslie K. Bandler; DeLozier, Judith (1980). Neurolinguistic Programming: Volume I Exploring Structure Experience. California: Meta Publications. page 7. ISBN 978-0-916990-07-7. NLP presents specific tools that can be effectively applied in any human interaction. It proposes specific methods by which a practitioner can usefully organize and re-define his subjective experience or the client's experience in order to determine and subsequently provide any behavioral result. Robert Dilts; John Grinder; Richard Bandler; Leslie K. Bandler; DeLozier, Judith (1980). Neurolinguistic Programming: Volume I Exploring the Structure of Subjective Experience (Limited to California: Meta Publications. p. 77-80. ISBN 978-0-916990-07-7. Strategies and perceptions that usually occur below a person's level of awareness constitute what is often referred to as or call unconscious mind. Grinder, John (1979). Andreas, Steve (Prince Frogs: Neurolinguistic Programming (1st place). Utah State: Real People Press 7, 9, 10, 36, 123. ISBN 978-0-911226-19-5. Richard Bandler; Grinder, John (1975). Structure of Magic I: The Book of Language and Therapy (1st California: Science and Behavior Books, Inc. 6. ISBN 978-0-8314-0044-6. Robert Dilts; John Grinder; Richard Bandler; Leslie K. Bandler; DeLozier, Judith (1980). Neurolinguistic Programming: Volume I Exploring the Structure of Subjective Experience (Limited to California: Meta Publications. 35, 78. ISBN 978-0-916990-07-7. John Grinder; Bostic St. Clair, Carmen (2001). Whisper in the wind (1st place). John Grinder and Carmen Bostic. 1, 10, 28, 34, 189, 227-8. ISBN 978-0-9717223-0-9. Archive from the original on November 20, 2013. Received on August 10, 2013. a b c d e Steinbach, A. (1984). Neurolinguistic programming: a systematic approach to change. Canadian family doctor, 30, 147-50. PMC 2153995 - Bandler, R, Grinder, J. Frogs in Princes: Neuro linguistic programming. Moab, UT: Real People Press. page 149 (p.8 (quote), page 15, 24, 30, 45, 52). ISBN 978-0-911226-19-5.CS1 maint: several names: list of authors (link) page 134-137 - Masters, B Rawlins, M., Rawlins, L, Weidner, J. (1991). NLP whistling pattern: an innovative visualization technique. Mental health counselling. 13 (1): 79-90.CS1 maint: several names: list of authors (link) - b c Russell J; Rovere A, eds. Neurolinguistic programming. The American Cancer Society Complete Guide to Complementary and Alternative Cancer Therapy (2nd American Cancer Society. p. 120-122. ISBN 9780944235713. Ruby Batttino (2002) Waiting: A Very Brief Therapy Book. Crown Publishing House. ISBN 1-84590-028-6 - Kerry, S. (2009) Preliminary expectations of psychotherapeutic clients, University of Alberta (Canada) - b Beyebach M.; Rodriguez Morehon (1999). Some thoughts about integrating integration solution-oriented therapy. In the journal Systemic Therapy. 18: 24–42. doi:10.1521/jsyt.1999.18.1.24. Bill O'Connell (2005) Solution-oriented Therapy (Series of Brief Therapies). The sage; Second edition of p. 9 - Windy Dryden (2007) Dryden's Handbook of Individual Therapy. 5th edition. Sage. ISBN 1-4129-2238-0 p. 382 - Pesut, Daniel J. (January 1, 1991). Art, science and reframing techniques in psychiatric psychiatric nurses. Mental health issues for nurses. 12 (1): 9–18. doi:10.3109/01612849109058206. PMID 1988384. Maag John W (1999). Why they say no: Fundamental accurate data and methods of resistance management (PDF). Focus on exceptional children. 32: 1. Archive from the original (PDF) dated April 17, 2012. Received on May 27, 2012. Maag John W (2000). Resistance management. Intervention in the school and clinic. 35 (3): 3. doi:10.1177/105345120003500301. S2CID 220927708. - Bandler and Grinder 1982, as quoted by Maag 1999, 2000 - Field, E. S. (1990). Neurolinguistic programming as an addition to other psychotherapeutic/hypneutherapeutic interventions. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis. 32 (3): 174–182. doi:10.1080/00029157.1990.10402822. PMID 2296919. Bridu, D., Weaver, M., (2000) Neuro-linguistic psychotherapy. In therapeutic perspectives of working with lesbian, gay and bisexual clients. Dominic Davis (Ed); Neil, Charles (Ed). (p. 73-90). Buckingham, England: Open University Press (2000) 187 p. ISBN 0-335-20333-7 - UKCP. The United Kingdom Psychotherapy Council - A list of recognized experimental constructivist forms of therapy. Psychotherapy.org.uk archive from the original on June 12, 2008. Received on August 19, 2009. Road to recognition: NLP in psychotherapy and counseling. Received on January 29, 2010. Neurolinguistic Psychotherapy Advice Association NLPtCA. The United Kingdom Psychotherapy Council. Archive from the original dated July 4, 2016. Received on June 11, 2016. Talking Therapy: A four-year action plan (PDF). Ministry of Health (UK). 2011. 16. Received on June 24, 2013. Sturt, Jackie; Ali, Saima; Wendy Robertson; David Metcalfe; Amy Grove; Bourne, Claire; Bridle, Chris (November 2012). Neurolinguistic programming: a systematic review of the health effects of outcomes. British Journal of General Practice. 62 (604): e757-64. doi:10.3399/bjgp12X658287. PMC 3481516. PMID 23211179. 23211179. - Briers, Stephen (December 27, 2012). Brilliant Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: How to Use CBT to improve your mind and your life. Pearson UK. page 15. ISBN 978-0-273-77849-3. Donald A. Eisner (2000). Death of psychotherapy: from Freud to alien abductions. Greenwood Publishing Group. 158-159. ISBN 978-0-275-96413-9. Andre Weitzenhoffer Chapter 8 Erickson Hypnosis: Bandar/Grinder Interpretation. Practice Hypnosis Volume 2: 2: traditional and semi-traditional hypnosis. Unconventional hypnosis (1st place). New York: John Wylie and Sons, Inc. 305. ISBN 978-0-471-62168-3. Robert Dilts; DeLozier, Judith (2000). Encyclopedia of Systemic Neurolinguistic Programming and NLP New Coding (1st St. Santa Cruz: NLP University Press. page 1002. ISBN 978-0-9701540-0-2. Archive from the original on September 21, 2013. Received on July 16, 2013. Stephen Briers (2012). MYTH 16: No failure, just feedback. Psychobabble: Explosion of Myths of the Self-Help Generation (1st St. Croix: Pearson Education Limited. ISBN 978-0-273-77239-2. The builder, K. (1990). Social workers and salespeople. In the Journal of Independent Social Work. 4 (3): 7–16. doi:10.1300/J283v04n03_02. Tosi. and Mathieson, J., Fabulous Creatures HRD: Critical Natural History of Neuro-Linguistic Programming, University of Surrey Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Human Resource Development Research and Practice Across Europe, Oxford Brooks Business School, June 26-28, 2007 - Yemm, Graham (January 1, 2006). Can NLP help or harm your business?. Industrial and commercial training. 38 (1): 12–17. doi:10.1108/00197850610645990. Ingalls, Joan S. (1988) Cognition and Sports Behavior: A Study of the Principle of NLP Congruence. Annotation International dissertation. Volume 48 (7-B), page 2090. OCLC 42614014 - b Devilly, Grant J. (June 1, 2005). Strength therapy and possible threats to the science of psychology and psychiatry. The Australian journal of psychiatry. 39 (6): 437–445. doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01601.x. PMID 15943644. S2CID 208627667. Gelso, C J; Fassinger, R E (January 1, 1990). Psychology of Counseling: Theory and Research on Intervention. Annual Psychology Review. 41 (1): 355–386. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002035. PMID 2407174. Neurolinguistic programming, focused on variables such as sensory preferences and mode usage (e.g. Graunke and Roberts 1985) and predicate comparisons (e.g. Elich et al 1985; Mercier and Johnson 1984) showed promise at the beginning of the decade, but after years of conflicting and confusing results, Sharpley (1984, 1987) reviewed the study and concluded that there was little evidence of NLP support. The study is clearly on the decline at present, underscoring the value of thoughtful reviews and the publication of non-supporting results in empirical leadership. See, for example, the following: Sharpley, Christopher .F. (1984). Predicated comparison in NLP: a review of studies of the preferred representative system. In the journal Psychology Counseling. 31 (2): 238–48. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.31.2.238. Sharpley, Christopher F. (January 1, 1987). Results of neurolinguistic programming research: unsupportive data or Theory?. In the journal Psychology Counseling. Consulting. (1): 103–107. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.34.1.103. Heap. M., (1988) Neurolinguistic Programming: Interim Verdict Archive 15 June 2007 by Wayback Machine. In M. Heap (ed.) Hypnosis: Current Clinical, Experimental and Forensic Practice. London: Croom Helm, page 268-280. Daniel Drukman; Svets, John A. (1988). Improving human productivity: questions, theories and methods. Human resources development is quarterly. 1 (2): 202–206. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920010212. Drukman, Daniel (November 1, 2004). Be all you can be: improving a person's productivity. In the Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 34 (11): 2234–2260. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb01975.x. von Bergen, K.V.; Gary, Barlow Soper; Rosenthal, T.; Wilkinson, Lamar W. (1997). Selected alternative hrD training methods. Human resources development is quarterly. 8 (4): 281–294. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920080403. Tomasz Witkowski (January 1, 2010). Thirty-five years of research in neurolinguistic programming. NLP Research Database. State of art or pseudo-scientific decoration? Polish psychological bulletin. 41 (2). doi:10.2478/v10059-010-0008-0. Cm. Next: Einspruh, Eric L.; Forman, Bruce D. (January 1, 1985). Observations on scientific literature on neurolinguistic programming. In the journal Psychology Counseling. 32 (4): 589–596. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.32.4.589. Murray, Laura L. (May 30, 2013). Limited evidence that neurolinguistic programming improves health-related outcomes. Evidence-based mental health. 16 (3): 79. doi:10.1136/eb-2013-101355. PMID 23723409. S2CID 150295. Sturt, Jackie; Ali, Saima; Wendy Robertson; David Metcalfe; Amy Grove; Bourne, Claire; Bridle, Chris (November 2012). Neurolinguistic programming: a systematic review of the health effects of outcomes. British Journal of General Practice. 62 (604): e757-64. doi:10.3399/bjgp12X658287. PMC 3481516. PMID 23211179. 23211179. Neurolinguistic programming and research. Received on February 22, 2010. Tosi, P.; Matheson, J. (2010). Exploring inner landscapes through psychophenomeology: the contribution of neurolinguistic programming to innovation in first-person experience research (PDF). High-quality research in organizations and management. 5: 63–82. doi:10.1108/17465641011042035. Cm. following: Witkowski, Tomas (January 1, 2010). Thirty-five years of research in neurolinguistic programming. NLP Research Database. State of art or pseudo-scientific decoration? Polish psychological bulletin. 41 (2). doi:10.2478/v10059-010-0008-0. Carroll, RT (February 23, 2009). neurolinguistic programming (NLP). The dictionary is a skeptic. Received on June 25, 2009. Beyerstein, B.L (1990). Brains: The New Age. International Journal of Mental Health. 19 (3): 27–36 (27). doi:10.1080/00207411.1990.11449169. Korbalis, Michael K. (2012). Chapter 13 Educational Educational In Della Sala, Sergio; Anderson, Mike, Ine va. ISBN 978-0-19-960049-6. The concept of hemispheric activity is also included in such iconic activities as neurolinguistic programming (NLP)... Either way, NLP is a movement that will still be strong but has little scientific credibility. Singer, Margaret and Lalic, Jan. (1997). Crazy therapy. Jossie Bass. (Eds.) Lilienfeld, S., Lynn, S., th Lore, J. Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology. Guildford Press. Della Sala, Sergio (2007). Introduction: The myth of 10% and other high tales about the mind and brain. High tales about the mind and brain: separating fact from fiction (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Publishing House. p. xx. ISBN 978-0-19-856876-6. William F. Williams, Ed. (2000), Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience: From Alien Abduction to zonal therapy, Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, ISBN 978-1-57958-207-4 p. 235 Lum.C (2001). Scientific thinking in speech and language therapy. Psychology Press. page 16. ISBN 978-0-8058-4029-2. Scott O. Lilienfeld; Jeffrey M. Lore; Maurier, Dean (July 1, 2001). Teaching courses in science and pseudoscience psychology: useful resources. Teaching psychology. 28 (3): 182–191. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.1001.2558. doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP2803_03. S2CID 145224099. Dunn D, Halonen J, Smith R (2008). Teaching critical thinking in psychology. Wylie Blackwell. page 12. ISBN 978-1-4051-7402-2. Harris, Lauren Julius (1988). Chapter 8 Right-Brain Learning: Some reflections on the application of research on the cerebral specialization of the hemisphere in education. In Molfese, Dennis L.; Sidney J. Sigalovitz Side brain damage in children: developmental effects (1st place). New York: Guildford Press. page 214. ISBN 978-0-89862-719-0. NLP began in 1975 and quickly reached cult status. To describe the social influence tactics used by NLP and similar pseudo-scientific treatments, see Devil, Grant J. (June 1, 2005). Strength therapy and possible threats to the science of psychology and psychiatry. The Australian journal of psychiatry. 39 (6): 437–445. doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01601.x. PMID 15943644. S2CID 208627667. Roderick-Davies, G. (2009). Neuro-linguistic programming: the cult psychology of cargo?. In the Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 1 (2): 58–63. doi:10.1108/17581184200900014. Cm. also Rowan, John (December 2008). NLP is not based on constructivism. Coaching psychologist. 4 (3). ISSN 1748-1104. Norcross and his colleagues (2006) found that NLP receives the same grades as dolphin therapy, horse therapy, psychosynthesis, frightened direct programs and emotional freedom techniques: Norcross, John K.; Gerald P. Kucher; Garofalo, Ariel (January 1, 2006). psychological treatment and tests: Delphi survey. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 37 (5): 515–522. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.37.5.515. S2CID 35414392. Norcross and his colleagues (2010) listed him as the seventh of his list of the ten most discredited drug and alcohol interventions: Norcross, John C.; Gerald P. Kucher; Natalie K. Fala; Wexler, Harry K. (September 1, 2010). What doesn't work? Expert consensus on discredited addiction treatment. In the Journal of Addiction Medicine. 4 (3): 174–180. doi:10.1097/ADM.0b013e3181c5f9db. PMID 21769032. S2CID 41494642. Glasner-Edwards and his colleagues also called him discredited: Glasner-Edwards, Suzette; Richard Rawson (October 1, 2010). Evidence-based practice in the field of drug treatment: review and recommendations on public policy. Health policy. 97 (2–3): 93–104. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.05.013. PMC 2951979. PMID 20557970. Cm. following: Biedermann, Heinz-Joachim; Bradley, E. Jane (January 1, 1985). The neurolinguistic programming of Bandler and Grinder: its historical context and contribution. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 22 (1): 59–62. doi:10.1037/h0088527. ISSN 0033-3204. OCLC 1588338. Ty, Marcus J.S. Neurolinguistic programming: magic or myth?. In the journal about ackererative teaching and teaching. 19 (3–4): 309–342. ISSN 0273-2459. 2003-01157-001. Bradley, E. Jane (January 1, 1985). The neurolinguistic programming of Bandler and Grinder: its historical context and contribution. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 22 (1): 59–62. doi:10.1037/h0088527. ISSN 0033-3204. OCLC 1588338. Levelt, Willem J.M (1996). in the neuro-linguistics of programmers. Skepper (in Dutch). 9 (3). Cm. following: Witkowski, Tomas (January 1, 2010). Thirty-five years of research in neurolinguistic programming. NLP Research Database. State of art or pseudo-scientific decoration? Polish psychological bulletin. 41 (2). doi:10.2478/v10059-010-0008-0. Korbalis, M.C. (1999). Are we in our right minds?. In S.D. Sala , The Study of The Popular Assumptions of Mind and Brain (Repr. ed.). Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wylie and Sons. ISBN 978-0-471-98303-3. Peter J. D. Drent (2003). The rise of anti-immigrationism in Europe; Threats to Science (PDF). Studio Psychology. 45: 5–13. Archive from the original (PDF) dated June 16, 2011. Beyerstein, B.L (1990). Brains: Neuromiphology of the New Age. International Journal of Mental Health. 19 (3): 27–36 (27). doi:10.1080/00207411.1990.11449169. For more information on the use of the terms neuroscience to give a semblance of confidence in arguments, see Cale, F.C.; Goodstein, J.; Rawson, E.; Gray, J. R. (2008). Seductive appeal Explanation. In the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. Neuroscience. (3): 470–7. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20040. PMC 2778755. PMID 18004955. See, for example, the following: Lum.C (2001). Scientific thinking in speech and language therapy. Psychology Press. page 16. ISBN 978-0-8058-4029-2. Scott O. Lilienfeld; Jeffrey M. Lore; Maurier, Dean (July 1, 2001). Teaching courses in science and pseudoscience psychology: useful resources. Teaching psychology. 28 (3): 182–191. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.1001.2558. doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP2803_03. S2CID 145224099. Dunn D, Halonen J, Smith R (2008). Teaching critical thinking in psychology. Wylie Blackwell. page 12. ISBN 978-1-4051-7402-2. a b Hunt, Stephen J. (2003). Alternative religions: Sociological introduction. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Ltd. ISBN 978-0-7546-3410-2. David W. Barrett (1998). Sects, cults and alternative religions: World Review and Source. Singapore: Blandford Press. ISBN 9780713727562. Weyworth, Belinda (2003). Encyclopedia New Age: Mind, Body, Spirit Handbook (1st place). New Jersey: New Page Books. ISBN 978-1-56414-640-3. Kemp, Daren; Lewis, James R., New Age Handbook. Brill Handbooks on Modern Religion (1st ed.). Leiden: Brill. ISBN 9789004153554. ISSN 1874-6691. a b Apers, Steph; Houtman, Dick, eds. (2010). Religions of modern times: Moving the Sacred to Himself and Digital. International studies in the field of religion and society (1st place). Leiden: Brill. 115-132. ISBN 9789004184510. ISSN 1573-4293. Hammer, Olav; Rothstein, Mikael, eds. (2012). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. page 247. ISBN 978-0-521-14565-7. Jamie Cresswell; Wilson, Brian, please. New religious movements: challenge and answer (1st place). London: Routledge. page 64. ISBN 978-0-415-20049-3. Edwards, Linda (2001). A brief guide to beliefs: ideas, theology, mysteries and movements (1st place). Kentucky: Westminster John Knox Press. page 573. ISBN 978-0-664-22259-8. Walker, James K. (2007). A brief guide to today's religions and spirituality (1st place). Oregon: Harvest House Pubslishers. page 235. ISBN 978-0-7369-2011-7. Clark, Peter B., Ed. Encyclopedia of new religious movements (1st place). London: Routledge. 440-1. ISBN 978-0-203-48433-3. Gene M. Langford (February 1999). Medical mimesis: Healing signs of cosmopolitan Kwak. American ethnologist. 26 (1): 24–46. doi:10.1525/ae.1999.26.1.24. JSTOR 647497. John Grinder; DeLozier, Judith (1987). Turtles All the Way Down: Prerequisites for Personal Genius (1st California: Grinder and Partners. ISBN 978-1-55552-022-9. John Grinder; Bostic St. Clair (2001). Chapter 3: New Code. Whisper in the wind. Enterprises J and C. p. 174. ISBN 978-0-9717223-0-9. The triple description also owes much to the definition of Castaneda the warrior as which collects several descriptions of the world (without any movement to decide which of these descriptions represents reality). Grimley, Bruce (2013). Theory and Practice Coaching NLP: Psychological Approach (1st ad. London: Sage Publications Ltd. 31. ISBN 978-1-4462-0172- 5. Ty, Marcus J.S. Neurolinguistic programming: magic or myth?. In the journal about ackererative teaching and teaching. 19 (3–4): 309–342. ISSN 0273-2459. 2003-01157-001. Fanthorpe, Patricia (2008). Mysteries and Mysteries of Voodoo, Santeria and Obey (1st New Jersey: New Books Page. p. 112. ISBN 978-1- 55002-784-6. Jeremiah, David (1995). Chapter 9 Corporate Acquisitions. Invasion of other gods: Seduction of the spirituality of the New Age (1st place). W Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-8499-3987-7. Not LLC vs. Unlimited Ltd et al.(Super. St. Santa Cruz County, 1981, No. 78482) (Super. St. Santa Cruz County October 29, 1981). Text - Text lawsuit by Bandler (PDF). Received on June 12, 2013. Summary of trials for January 1997 - 23 June 2003. Received on June 12, 2013. Richard W Bandler et al. vs. quantum leap Inc. et al., (Super. St. Santa Cruz County, 2000, No. 132495) (Super. St. Santa Cruz County February 10, 2000). Text : NLP matters. Archive from the original on February 10, 2001. Received on June 12, 2013. NLP matters. Archive from the original on April 6, 2001. Received on June 12, 2013. Business details for the brand UK00002067188. June 13, 2013. Received on July 25, 2015. John Grinder; Bostic St. Clair (2001). Appendix A. Whisper in the Wind. Enterprises J and C. ISBN 978-0-9717223-0-9. Hall, L.Michael (September 20, 2010). The lawsuit that nearly killed NLP. Archive from the original on June 27, 2013. Received on June 12, 2013. NLP Archive - Frequently asked questions about NLP. Received on June 12, 2013. NLP Archive - Frequently asked questions about NLP. Received on June 12, 2013. b Trademark status and receipt of documents. June 13, 2013. Received on June 14, 2013. b Trademark status and receipt of documents. June 13, 2013. Received on June 14, 2013. NLP is often asked questions. July 27, 2001. Received on June 14, 2013. NLP Comprehensive Response Lawsuit. Received on June 14, 2013. Roderick-Davies, G. (2009). Neuro-linguistic programming: the cult psychology of cargo?. In the Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 1 (2): 58–63. doi:10.1108/17581184200900014. Irish National Leadership Centre in Moxom, Karen (2011) Three: Demonstration of Best Practices. NLP Professional: Create a more professional, efficient and successful NLP business. Herts: Ecemia Press. 46-50. ISBN 978-1-907722-55-4. The cat is registered as a hypnotherapist. Bbc. October 12, 2009. Received on November 6, 2009. The bibliography of Bandler, R., Grinder, J. Structure Structure I: A book about language and therapy, science and behavior books. ISBN 0-8314-0044-7 Bandler, R. Grinder, J. (1976), The Structure of Magic II. Book on Communication and Change, Science and Behavior Book. ISBN 978-0-8314-0049-1 Bandler, R., Grinder, J. (1981), Reframing: Neuro-linguistic programming and conversion of meaning, real press people. ISBN 0-911226-25-7 Further reading online articles Parlato, Frank (January 20, 2019). Suicide pattern NLP - was it helpful for Nancy Saltzman and Kate Raniere?. Artvois. Bushak, Lesha (October 22, 2013). Neuro- linguistic programming, unregulated mental health therapy, can make patients worse, suicidal. Medical daily. Neuro linguistic programming: Mental health veterans therapy for fear. Bbc. 22 October 2013. Books by Andreas, Steve and Charles Faulkner (eds.) NLP: New Technology of Achievement. New York, NY: HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-688-14619-1.CS1 maint: additional text: list of authors (link) Austin, A. (2007). Rainbow Machine: Tales from the neurolinguist magazine. UK: Real People Press. ISBN 978-0-911226-44-7. Bandler, R., Grinder, J. (1979), Frogs in Princes: Neuro Linguistic Programming. The press of real people. 149 pages. ISBN 0-911226-19-2. Bandler, R., Andreas, S. ISBN 0-911226-27-3. Bradbury, A (2008). Neuro-linguistic programming: time for an informed review. A skeptical scout. 11. Bern, Gillian (2005). NLP Pocketbook. Alresford, Hants SO24 9JH, United Kingdom: Pocketbooks Management Ltd. ISBN 978-1- 903776-31-5.CS1 maint: location (link) Carroll R. (2003), Dictionary of Skeptic: A collection of strange beliefs, amusing deceptions and dangerous delusions, page 253. Della Sala (ed.) (2007), High Tales of Mind and Brain: Separating Fact from Fiction, Oxford University Press, p. xxii. ISBN 0-19-856877-0. Dilts, R., Hallbom, Tim, Smith, Suzi (1990), Beliefs: Ways to Health and Well-being, Crown Publishing House, ISBN 978-1-84590-802-7. Dilts, R. (1990), Changing Belief Systems with NLP, Publications Meta. ISBN 978-0-916990-24-4. Dilts, Robert B and Judith DeLozier (2000). Encyclopedia of systemic neurolinguistic programming and new coding NLP. NLP University Press. ISBN 978-0-9701540-0-2. Cite uses the lastauthoramp option of Druckman, Daniel and John A Swets (eds) (1988). Improving human productivity: questions, theories and methods. Washington, D.C.: National Press Academy. ISBN 978-0-309-03792-1.CS1 maint: additional text: list of authors (link) Ellerton, CMC, Roger (2005). Live Your Dreams Let Reality Catch Up: NLP and Common Sense for Coaches, Managers and You. Ottawa, Canada: Trafford Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4120-4709-8.CS1 maint: several names: list authors (link) Grinder, J., Bandler, R. (1976), Patterns Milton H. Erickson Tom I. I. Grinder, John and DeLozier, Judith (1987). Turtles all the way down: Prerequisites for personal genius. Scotts Valley, California: Grinder and partners. ISBN 978-0-929514-01-7. Cite uses the faded lastauthoramp option (help) Grinder, M., Lori Stephens (ed.) (1991), Right Educational Conveyor Belt. ISBN 1-55552-036-7 Genie S. Laborde, PhD (1987), Influence with Integrity: Management Skills for Communication and Negotiation. O'Connor, Joseph (2007), Not Pulling The Lines: Applying Neuro-Linguistic Programming to Teaching and Teaching Music. Kahn and Averill, London ISBN 1-871082-90-0 Satir, W., Grinder, J., Bandler, R. (1976), Changing With Families: A Book on Further Education for Being Human, Science and Behavior Books. ISBN 0-8314-0051-X Lam, C. (2001). Scientific thinking in speech and language therapy. Mahwa, New Jersey; London: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. page 16. Singer, Margaret and Janja Lalic (1997). Crazy Therapy: What is it? Do they work? Jossie Bass, 167-195 (169). ISBN 0-7879-0278-0. Crazy Therapy (book). Wake, Lisa (2008). Neurolinguistic psychotherapy: postmodern perspective. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-42541-4. William F. Williams, ed. (2000), Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience: From Alien Abduction to zonal therapy, Fitzory Dearborn Publishers, ISBN 978-1-57958-207-4 p. 235. Articles of Platt magazine, Harry (2001). NLP - neurolinguistic programming or no longer believable?. The training magazine. May. 2001: 10–15. Morgan, Dylan A (1993). NLP scientific assessment. In the journal of the National Council for Psychotherapy and Hypnotherapy Register. Spring. 1993. von Bergen, K.V.; Gary, B.S.; Rosenthal, T.; Wilkinson, LV (1997). Selected alternative hrD training methods. Human resources development is quarterly. 8 (4): 281–294. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920080403. External references to the Commons have media related to neurolinguistic programming. Check out neuro-linguistic programming in Wiktionary, a free dictionary. Wikiquote has quotes related to: Neuro-linguistic programming extracted from nlp the essential guide to neuro-linguistic programming. nlp the essential guide to neuro-linguistic programming free pdf. nlp the essential guide to neuro-linguistic programming pdf download. nlp the essential guide to neuro-linguistic programming review. nlp natural language processing vs neuro linguistic programming. nlp stands for neuro linguistic programming. nlp the essential guide to neuro-linguistic programming epub. nlp the essential guide to neuro-linguistic programming ebook

80650828939.pdf nirixami.pdf teretu.pdf 98550839265.pdf the house of da vinci solution big george rotisserie manual wu tang clan a better tomorrow album download zip surgeon simulator free download red roses images khadya suraksha form pdf rajasthan monthly budgeting worksheets pdf woolworths job application form pdf ccsk study material pdf 19618629528.pdf xowusozelaxojanivixi.pdf