Advance Publication

The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science

Accepted Date: 12 Mar 2013 J-STAGE Advance Published Date: 26 Mar 2013 1 Virology 2 3 NOTE 4 5 Title: 6 Function of feline signaling lymphocyte activation molecule as a receptor of canine 7 distemper 8 9 Authors: 10 Yuka HARA1), Junko SUZUKI1), Keita NOGUCHI1), Yutaka TERADA1), Hiroshi 11 SHIMODA1), Takuya MIZUNO2) and Ken MAEDA1), * 12 13 Laboratories of 1)Veterinary Microbiology and 2)Veterinary Internal Medicine, Joint 14 Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Yamaguchi University, 1677-1 Yoshida, Yamaguchi 15 753-8515, Japan 16 17 18 Running head: 19 FELINE SLAM AS A RECEPTOR OF CDV 20 21 *CORRESPONDENCE TO: MAEDA, K., Laboratory of Veterinary Microbiology, 22 Joint Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Yamaguchi University, 1677-1 Yoshida, 23 Yamaguchi 753-8515, Japan 24 E-mail: [email protected]

25

1

26 ABSTRACT

27 use signaling lymphocyte activation molecule (SLAM) as a

28 receptor for their entry to cells. In this study, a complete gene encoding SLAM of a

29 domestic cat was identified. The identity of feline SLAM with canine one was 73%,

30 and feline SLAM formed the same cluster with those of carnivores. Furthermore, feline

31 cell expressing feline SLAM supported growth of canine distemper virus (CDV) as

32 well as that expressing canine one. These results indicated that feline SLAM can

33 function as a receptor for morbilliviruses, and our established feline cells that express

34 feline SLAM might be useful for analysis of morbilliviruses originated from felids.

35

36 KEY WORDS: canine distemper virus, feline, signaling lymphocyte activation

37 molecule

2

38 Canine distemper virus (CDV) infects dogs and various species of carnivores.

39 It causes a fatal disease which involves the development of pyrexia, anorexia, nasal

40 discharge, conjunctivitis, diarrhea, leukopenia and encephalitis [2]. Recently, CDV was

41 recognized as a cause of morbidity and mortality in large felids, such as lions (Panthera

42 leo) in Tanzania’s Serengeti National Park [18]. It has also been found in lions, tigers

43 (Panthera tigris), leopards (Panthera pardus) and a jaguar (Panthera onca) in North

44 American zoos in 1991-1992 [4], one Siberian tiger (Panthera tigris altaica) in

45 Pokrovka, Russia, in 2004 [17] and tigers in a Japanese zoo in 2009 [14]. Although

46 CDV causes severe disease in various species, including large felids, it is still unclear

47 whether it can cause disease in domestic cats. In a serological survey of domestic cats,

48 some cats possessed virus-neutralizing antibody to CDV [9]. Furthermore, a feline

49 (FmoPV) was isolated from domestic cats in Hong Kong and might be

50 associated with tubulointerstitial nephritis [21]. Therefore, this suggests that domestic

51 cats can also be infected with morbilliviruses, including CDV.

52 Signaling lymphocyte activation molecule (SLAM) is expressed on activated T

53 and B cells, immature thymocytes, memory T cells [5, 7, 19], activated monocytes [12]

54 and mature dendritic cells [6, 11] and serves as a common receptor for morbillivirus [1,

55 20]. Canine SLAM expressed on cells of the immune system is also a major cellular

1

56 receptor for CDV infection [20]. However, a complete gene encoding SLAM of felids

57 including domestic cats has not been identified, and it is unclear whether it functions as

58 a cellular receptor for morbilliviruses, including CDV and FmoPV.

59 In this study, we identified the complete gene encoding feline SLAM and

60 established feline SLAM-expressing cells to assess whether feline SLAM functions as a

61 receptor for CDV.

62 To amplify the gene encoding feline SLAM, two primers, feline SLAM ATG

63 -1F (5’-TTC TCT TTC TTC AGT GGC TG-3’) and feline SLAM TGA-R (5‘-TCC CTT

64 CGC TGA GTC TCT G-3’), were designed based on the portion of the cat

65 homologous to the gene encoding canine SLAM. A feline thymus cDNA library of a

66 domestic cat (Bastard) was prepared using a cDNA Cycle® Kit according to the manual

67 (Invitrogen, Carlesbad, CA, U.S.A.). The gene encoding feline SLAM was amplified by

68 Takara Ex-Taq kit (Takara, Otsu, Japan). The reaction was carried out with the

69 following temperature profile: 94°C for 2 min, 40 cycles consisting of denaturation at

70 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 60°C for 30 sec and extension at 72°C for 1 min and final

71 extension at 72°C for 10 min. The amplified products were purified by Minelute PCR

72 Purification kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Sequencing reactions were performed

73 using six primers, feline SLAM ATG-1F, feline SLAM TGA-R, feline SLAM F

2

74 (5’-ATG AAC AGG TCT CCA CTC CG-3’), feline SLAM R (5’-CTG GAC TTG GGC

75 ATA GAT CG-3’), feline SLAM F1 (5’-TCA TTG GTG TCA TCT TGA CG-3’), and

76 feline SLAM R1 (5’-TGG GTC CAG TTC AAC ACC TT-3’) and a BigDye Terminator

77 v3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, U.S.A.). The reaction

78 was carried out with the following temperature profile: at 96°C for 1 min and 25 cycles

79 consisting of 96°C for 10 sec, 50°C for 5 sec, and 60°C for 4 min and nucleotide

80 sequences were analyzed by the Center of Gene Research at Yamaguchi University. The

81 nucleotide sequence was deposited in the DNA data bank of Japan (DDBJ) as accession

82 number AB771742.

83 Feline SLAM consisted of 1,014 bp encoding 337 amino acids. There was 73%

84 identity between the predicted amino acid sequences and canine SLAM. Feline SLAM

85 differed from canine SLAM at five (66, 67, 72, 74 and 82) of the twenty-one amino acid

86 residues at the SLAM interface which are involved in regulating the binding and

87 specificity of morbillivirus [16]. There was 78% identity between feline SLAM and the

88 pinniped SLAM of walrus (Odobenus rosmarus) and seals (Phoca larga). Phylogenetic

89 analysis showed that feline SLAM was closely related to those of various carnivores

90 (Fig. 1).

91 The gene encoding feline SLAM without the signal peptide and transmembrane

3

92 region was amplified from feline thymus cDNA by PCR with the primers,

93 pDis-Bgl-feline SLAM F (5’-TCA GAT CTG AGA GCT TGA TGA CTT GTC AA-3’)

94 and pDis-Sal-feline SLAM R (5’-TCG TCG ACG GGT CTT AGT TCT GGA GGA

95 T-3’). In order to amplify the corresponding canine gene, the gene encoding canine

96 SLAM without the signal peptide and transmembrane region was amplified from

97 pDisplay/cSLAM [15] with the primers, canineSLAM-95F (5’-CCA GAT CTG AGA

98 GCT TGA TGA ATT GCC C-3’) and CDV724R (5’-TCG TCG ACT CTT GGC ACC

99 GAA GAC TCT G-3’). PCR products were digested with restriction endonucleases

100 BglII and SalI and cloned into BglII and SalI sites of the expression plasmid pDisplay

101 (Invitrogen), which has genes for a signal peptide of mouse immunoglobulin

102 kappa-chain V-J2-C, a hemagglutinin A (HA) epitope tag upstream of multiple cloning

103 sites and neomycin-resistance. These expression plasmids were named

104 pDisplay/fSLAM(PDGFR) and pDisplay/cSLAM(PDGFR), respectively.

105 CRFK cells originating from feline kidney (ATCC Number: CCL-94) were

106 transfected with pDisplay/fSLAM(PDGFR) using LipofectamineTM LTX and PlusTM

107 Reagent (Invitrogen) and selected by the addition of 800 μg/ml of G418. The expression

108 plasmid pDisplay/cSLAM(PDGFR) and an empty plasmid pDisplay were also

109 transfected into CRFK cells. After selection with G418, SLAM expression was

4

110 confirmed by flow cytometric analysis using an anti-HA tagged monoclonal antibody

111 (clone HA-7; SIGMA-ALDRICH, Tokyo, Japan) or normal mouse IgG1 (R&D systems,

112 Minneapolis, MN, U.S.A.) as a negative control. Anti-normal mouse IgG labeled with

113 ALEXA Fluor 488 (Invitrogen) was used as a secondary antibody. The results showed

114 that feline and canine SLAM were expressed equally on the surface of CRFK cells

115 (47.23 and 47.16%, respectively) (Fig. 2A, B). These cells were named

116 CRFK/cSLAM(PDGFR), CRFK/fSLAM(PDGFR) and CRFK/pDisplay. For further

117 experiments, these cells were passaged less than three times.

118 Three CDV strains were used in this study. KDK-1 (genotype Asia-1) was

119 isolated from a diseased dog in Japan in 1991 using Vero cells [13] and propagated in

120 A72/cSLAM cells [15] after six passages in Vero cells. KochiO1A (genotype Asia-1)

121 was isolated from an oral swab of a dead masked palm civet in Kochi Prefecture in 2008

122 (manuscript in preparation) and was only propagated in A72/cSLAM cells. These field

123 isolates were not plaque-purified and were propagated less than six times in

124 A72/cSLAM cells. The Onderstepoort vaccine strain (genotype America-1) was only

125 propagated in Vero cells. Viral titers were determined by plaque assay using

126 CRFK/cSLAM [15] for KDK-1 and KochiO1A, and Vero cells (JCRB Number;

127 JCRB9013) for Onderstepoort [10]

5

128 To analyze the function of these expressed SLAMs as receptors for CDV,

129 CRFK/fSLAM(PDGFR), CRFK/cSLAM(PDGFR) cells and CRFK/pDisplay were

130 infected with KDK-1, KochiO1A or Onderstepoort at a multiplicity of infection (MOI)

131 of 0.002, and cytopathic effect was observed. KDK-1 and KochiO1A produced large

132 syncytia in both CRFK/fSLAM(PDGFR) cells (Fig.2 D, G) and

133 CRFK/cSLAM(PDGFR) cells (Fig.2 E, H), but not in CRFK/pDisplay cells (Fig.2 F, I).

134 Onderstepoort produced syncytia in all cells (Fig.2 J-K).

135 CDV growth was compared in cells which were seeded on 6 well plates

136 (5.0×105 cells per well) and infected with KDK-1, KochiO1A and Onderstepoort at an

137 MOI of 0.002. After 1 hour adsorption, the inoculum was removed, the cells were

138 washed twice with DMEM without FCS, and then 5 ml of DMEM containing 10% FCS

139 was added. The supernatants were collected every 24 hr, and virus titers were

140 determined by plaque assay. The growth kinetics showed that KDK-1 and KochiO1A

141 efficiently replicated in both CRFK/cSLAM(PDGFR) and CRFK/fSLAM(PDGFR)

142 cells, but not in CRFK/pDisplay cells (Fig.3). The highest viral titers of KDK-1 were

143 8.8×105 in CRFK/fSLAM(PDGFR), 9.3×105 in CRFK/cSLAM(PDGFR) and 1.9×104

144 PFU/well in CRFK/pDisplay cells at 96 hr postinfection. The highest titers of

145 KochiO1A were 6.8×103 in CRFK/fSLAM(PDGFR) cells at 96 hr postinfection,

6

146 1.9×104 in CRFK/cSLAM(PDGFR) cells at 96 hr postinfection and 2.5×101 PFU/well in

147 CRFK/pDisplay cells at 72 hr postinfection. Compared to KochiO1A, KDK-1 replicated

148 well in CRFK/pDisplay cells. Since KDK-1 initially isolated using Vero cells, the strain

149 may also utilize alternative cellular receptor in addition to the SLAM. On the other hand,

150 Onderstepoort replicated more efficiently in CRFK/pDisplay cells than in

151 CRFK/fSLAM(PDGFR) or CRFK/cSLAM(PDGFR) cells. The highest viral titers of

152 Onderstepoort were 9.8×104 in CRFK/fSLAM(PDGFR) cells at 72 hr postinfection,

153 2.0×105 in CRFK/cSLAM(PDGFR) at 72 hr postinfection and 1.8×106 PFU/well, in

154 CRFK/pDisplay cells at 96 hr postinfection. Similar tendency in intracellular virus

155 growth was observed (data not shown).

156 In this study, the complete gene encoding feline SLAM was identified and

157 found to have higher homology with SLAM of other carnivores which are susceptible to

158 CDV infection rather than with SLAM of other animals susceptible to infection with

159 other morbilliviruses such as virus, rinderpest virus and peste-des-petits

160 ruminant virus. In addition, our established cell line, CRFK/fSLAM, supported

161 replication of KDK-1 and KochiO1A as well as CRFK/cSLAM, indicating that feline

162 SLAM, as well as canine SLAM, can serve as a receptor for CDV field strains.

163 Furthermore, Appel et al. [3] reported CDV replication in lymphatic tissues and

7

164 macrophages of experimentally infected cats without any clinical signs. These results

165 indicate that, in addition to canine lymphocytes, feline lymphocytes expressing SLAM

166 might also become infected with CDV.

167 Fatal infection of large felids with CDV has recently been reported worldwide.

168 In a Japanese safari-style zoo, 12 tigers developed respiratory and gastrointestinal

169 disease, and one tiger died of a neurological disorder following CDV infection [14].

170 One Siberian tiger presented symptoms of neurological signs and anorexia and

171 ultimately died in Russia [17]. Although SLAMs of large felids such as lions and tigers

172 have not been identified, SLAM from domestic cats belonging to the same family could

173 function as a receptor for CDV.

174 On the other hand, specific pathogen-free domestic cats inoculated with

175 homogenized tissues from a Chinese leopard (Panthera pardus japonensis) that had

176 died following natural infection with CDV did not show any clinical signs except for a

177 transient leukopenia [8], indicating that CDV was less pathogenic in domestic cats. Our

178 results show that CDV can use feline SLAM as a receptor. This is supported by the fact

179 that the CDV experimentally infected cats showed a tentative viremia associated with

180 CDV-infected PBMC [8]. Furthermore, in comparison with field strains, Onderstepoort

181 grew well in CRFK/pDisplay cells, but not in feline or canine SLAM-expressing cells.

8

182 This result is consistent with our previous observation [15], but the reason why

183 Onderstepoort cannot propagate well in SLAM-expressing cells remains unclear.

184 Further experiments will be required to clarify the mechanism behind this inhibition.

185 In 2012, FmoPV was isolated from CRFK cells [21] following subculture over

186 a prolonged period. On day 14 after the 8th passage, the cells displayed typical

187 cytopathic effects of rounding, followed by detachment from the monolayer, and on day

188 10 after the 16th passage, syncytia were observed [21]. Although SLAM is a common

189 receptor for morbilliviruses, including CDV, measles virus, rinderpest virus and

190 peste-des-petits ruminant virus, it is unclear whether FmoPV uses SLAM as a receptor.

191 However, this CRFK/fSLAM will be useful for isolation of morbilliviruses, including

192 CDV, from domestic cats.

193 In conclusion, feline SLAM was shown to serve as a receptor for CDV

194 infection.

195

196 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 197 KDK-1 was kindly provided by Dr. Mochizuki (Kagoshima University). This 198 work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, 199 and Technology of Japan, and Grant-in-Aid for Japan Society for the Promotion of 200 Science Fellows.

9

201 REFERENCES 202 1. Adombi, C.M., Lelenta, M., Lamien, C.E., Shamaki, D., Koffi, Y.M., Traoré, A., 203 Silber, R., Couacy-Hymann, E., Bodjo, S.C., Djaman J.A., Luckins A.G. and Diallo 204 A. 2011. Monkey CV1 cell line expressing the sheep-goat SLAM protein: a highly 205 sensitive cell line for the isolation of peste des petits ruminants virus from 206 pathological specimens. J. Virol. Methods. 173: 306-313. 207 2. Appel, M.J. 1969. Pathogenesis of canine distemper. Am. J. Vet. Res. 30: 208 1167-1182. 209 3. Appel, M., Shefly, B.E., Percy, D.H. and Gaskin, J.M. 1974. Canine distemper virus 210 in domesticated cats and pigs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 35: 803-806. 211 4. Appel, M.J., Yates, R.A., Foley, G.L., Bernstein, J.J., Santinelli, S., Spelman, L.H., 212 Miller, L.D., Arp, L.H., Anderson, M. and Barr, M. 1994. Canine distemper 213 epizootic in lions, tigers, and leopards in North America. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 6: 214 277-288. 215 5. Aversa, G., Chang, C.C., Carballido, J.M., Cocks, B.G. and de Vries, J.E. 1997. 216 Engagement of the signaling lymphocytic activation molecule (SLAM) on activated 217 T cells results in IL-2-independent, cyclosporin A-sensitive T cell proliferation and 218 IFN-gamma production. J. Immunol. 158: 4036-4044. 219 6. Bleharski, J.R., Niazi, K.R., Sieling, P.A., Cheng, G. and Modlin, R.L. 2001. 220 Signaling lymphocytic activation molecule is expressed on CD40 ligand-activated 221 dendritic cells and directly augments production of inflammatory cytokines. J. 222 Immunol. 167: 3174-3181. 223 7. Cocks, B.G., Chang, C.C., Carballido, J.M., Yssel, H., de, Vries, J.E. and Aversa, G. 224 1995. A novel receptor involved in T-cell activation. Nature 376: 260-263. 225 8. Harder, T.C., Kenter, M., Vos, H., Siebelink, K., Huisman, W., van, Amerongen, G., 226 Orvell, C., Barrett, T., Appel, M.J. and Osterhaus, A.D. 1996. Canine distemper 227 virus from diseased large felids: biological properties and phylogenetic 228 relationships. J. Gen. Virol. 77: 397-405. 229 9. Ikeda, Y., Nakamura, K., Miyazawa, T., Chen, M.C., Kuo, T.F., Lin, J.A., Mikami, 230 T., Kai, C. and Takahashi, E. 2001. Seroprevalence of canine distemper virus in 231 cats. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 8: 641-644. 232 10. Kameo, Y., Nagao, Y., Nishio, Y., Shimoda, H., Nakano, H., Suzuki, K., Une, Y., 233 Sato, H., Shimojima, M. and Maeda, K. 2012. Epizootic canine distemper virus 234 infection among wild mammals. Vet. Microbiol. 154: 222-229. 235 11. Kruse, M., Meinl, E., Henning, G., Kuhnt, C., Berchtold, S., Berger, T., Schuler, G. 236 and Steinkasserer, A. 2001. Signaling lymphocytic activation molecule is expressed 237 on mature CD83+ dendritic cells and is up-regulated by IL-1 beta. J. Immunol. 167: 238 1989-1995. 239 12. Minagawa, H., Tanaka, K., Ono, N., Tatsuo, H., Yanagi, Y. 2001. Induction of the 240 measles virus receptor SLAM (CD150) on monocytes. J. Gen. Virol. 82: 241 2913-2917. 242 13. Mochizuki, M., Hashimoto, M., Hagiwara, S., Yoshida, Y. and Ishiguro, S. 1999. 243 Genotypes of canine distemper virus determined by analysis of the hemagglutinin 244 genes of recent isolates from dogs in Japan. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 2936-2942. 245 14. Nagao, Y., Nishio, Y., Shiomoda, H., Tamaru, S., Shimojima, M., Goto, M., Une, Y., 246 Sato, A., Ikebe, Y. and Maeda, K. 2012. An outbreak of canine distemper virus in 247 tigers (Panthera tigris): possible transmission from wild animals to zoo animals. J.

10

248 Vet. Med. Sci. 74: 699-705. 249 15. Nakano, H., Kameo, Y., Andoh, K., Ohno, Y., Mochizuki, M., Maeda, K. 2009. 250 Establishment of canine and feline cells expressing canine signaling lymphocyte 251 activation molecule for canine distemper virus study. Vet. Microbiol. 133: 179-183. 252 16. Ohishi, K., Ando, A., Suzuki, R., Takishita, K., Kawato, M., Katsumata, E., Ohtsu, 253 D., Okutsu, K., Tokutake, K., Miyahara, H., Nakamura, H., Murayama, T. and 254 Maruyama, T. 2010. Host-virus specificity of morbilliviruses predicted by structural 255 modeling of the marine mammal SLAM, a receptor. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. 256 Infect. Dis. 33: 227-241. 257 17. Quigley, K.S., Evermann, J.F., Leathers, C.W., Armstrong, D.L., Goodrich, J., 258 Duncan, N.M. and Miquelle, D.G. 2010. Morbillivirus infection in a wild siberian 259 tiger in the Russian Far East. J. Wildl. Dis. 46: 1252-1256. 260 18. Roelke-Parker, M.E., Munson, L., Packer, C., Kock, R., Cleaveland, S., Carpenter, 261 M., O'Brien, S.J., Pospischil, A., Hofmann-Lehmann, R., Lutz, H., Mwamengele, 262 G.L., Mgasa, M.N., Machange, G.A., Summers, B.A. and Appel, M.J. 1996. A 263 canine distemper virus epidemic in Serengeti lions (Panthera leo). Nature 264 379:441-445. 265 19. Sidorenko, S.P. and Clark, E.A. 1993. Characterization of a cell surface 266 glycoprotein IPO-3, expressed on activated human B and T lymphocytes. J. 267 Immunol. 151: 4614-24. 268 20. Tatsuo, H., Ono, N. and Yanagi, Y. 2001. Morbilliviruses use signaling lymphocyte 269 activation molecules (CD150) as cellular receptors. J. Virol. 75: 5842-5850. 270 21. Woo, P.C., Lau, S.K., Wong, B.H., Fan, R.Y., Wong, A.Y., Zhang, A.J., Wu, Y., Choi, 271 G.K., Li, K.S., Hui, J., Wang, M., Zheng, B.J., Chan, K.H. and Yuen, K.Y. 2012. 272 Feline morbillivirus, a previously undescribed paramyxovirus associated with 273 tubulointerstitial nephritis in domestic cats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109: 274 5435-5440. 275

11

276 Figure captions 277 Fig. 1. Phylogenetic relationship based on the amino acid sequence of SLAM. Feline 278 SLAM is shown in bold. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted using MEGA5. 279 280 Fig. 2. Expression of SLAM on the cell surface and development of syncytia after CDV 281 infection. (A-C) Flow cytometric analysis of SLAM expression on CRFK cells. CRFK 282 cells were transfected with expression plasmids and selected with G418. The resulting 283 cell lines were named CRFK/fSLAM(PDGFR) (A), CRFK/cSLAM(PDGFR) (B) and 284 CRFK/pDisplay (C). Cells were first incubated with anti-HA tagged monoclonal 285 antibody (clone HA-7) and then incubated with anti-normal mouse IgG labeled with 286 ALEXA Fluor 488. (D-K) CPE induced by CDV infection in CRFK/fSLAM(PDGFR) 287 (D, G, J), CRFK/cSLAM(PDGFR) (E, H, K) and CRFK/pDisplay cells (F, I, L). Cells 288 were infected with KDK-1 (D-F), KochiO1A (G-I) or Onderstepoort (J-K) strains of 289 CDV for 72 hr and then observed using microscopy. 290 291 Fig. 3. Growth kinetics of CDV in SLAM-expressing CRFK cells. KDK-1 (A), 292 KochiO1A (B) and Onderstepoort (C) infected into CRFK/fSLAM, CRFK/cSLAM and 293 CRFK/pDisplay cells at an MOI of 0.002. Mean values from two independent 294 experiments are shown. 295

12

Figure 1

99 Cattle (AAK61860) 99 Zebu cattle (ABB58750) 100 Water buffalo (ABB58751) Goat (ABB58752) 99 98 Sheep (NP_001035378) 99 Pacific white-sided dolphin (BAH10670) 100 42 Killer whale (BAH10671) Pig (NP_001230749) Horse (XP 001504489) 96 Domestic cat 99 Spotted seal (BAH10672) 41 Walrus (BAH10673) 97 97 Giant panda (XP_002928483) 72 Mink (ACM90097) 75 37 Dog (NP_001003084) Raccoon dog (ACD47120) 100 Red fox (ACD47119) 94 Caribbean manatee (BAH10674) 100 African savanna elephant (XP_003415237) 100 Asiatic elephant (BAH10675) Small-eared galago (XP_003795232) 90 Cotton-top tamarin (AAG18445) 99 100 White-tufted-ear marmoset (XP_002760222) Bolivian squirrel monkey (XP_003938005) 100 Sumatran orangutan (XP_002809959) 100 Rhesus monkey (XP_001117605) 53 Human (AAK77968) 99 Chimpanzee (XP_513924) 62 Pygmy chimpanzee (XP_003811920) Rabbit (XP_002715271) House mouse (BAE96300) 100 Norway rat (NP_001102548)

0.05

1

Figure 2

A B C

47.23% 47.16% 0.96%

D E F

G H I

J K L

2

Figure 3

A B C 1.0.E+07 1.0.E+07 1.0.E+07 1.0.E+06 1.0.E+06 1.0.E+06

PFU) 1.0.E+05 PFU) 1.0.E+05 1.0.E+05 CRFK/fSLAM(P (PFU) DGFR) 1.0.E+04 1.0.E+04 1.0.E+04 CRFK/cSLAM(P 1.0.E+03 1.0.E+03 1.0.E+03 DGFR)

Virus titer ( titer Virus 1.0.E+02 ( titer Virus 1.0.E+02 titer Virus 1.0.E+02 CRFK/pDisplay 1.0.E+01 1.0.E+01 1.0.E+01 0 24 48 72 96 120144 0 24 48 72 96 120144 0 24 48 72 96 120144 Hours post infection Hours post infection Hours post infection

3