DOCSLIB.ORG

Uses Science for a Changing World

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations in Wisconsin, 2000 Open-File Report 00-251 Tomorrow River, Portage County uses science for a changing world WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS IN WISCONSIN, 2000 Compiled by D.E. Maertz U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 00-251 Middleton, Wisconsin 2000 Cover photo: Jana Stewart U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Suvey Branch of fiiformation Services 8505 Research Way P.O. Box 25286 Middleton, WI53562 Denver, CO 80225-0286 Wisconsin District WRD home page: http://wi.water.usgs.gov/ Wisconsin Real-Time Water Data: http://wi.water.usgs.gov/rt-cgi/gen_tbl_pg Wisconsin Ground Water page: http://wi.water.usgs.gov/gw/ USGS home page: http://www.usgs.gov/ CONTENTS Program Page Basic data collection 00100 Collection of basic records-surface water..................................................................! 00200 Collection of basic records-ground water................................................................10 00201 Crandon ground water............................................................................................... 12 00302 Collection of basic records-Dane County program.................................................. 13 00303 Interagency methods and data comparability board (MDCB).................................. 14 00304 Age dating ground water in atrazine prohibition areas in Wisconsin....................... 15 00351 Ground-water age dating in the Little Plover River Basin, Wisconsin..................... 16 00400 Collection of basic records-sediment....................................................................... 17 00404 Menomonee River channel restoration.....................................................................18 00700 Wisconsin water-use data file...................................................................................19 Interpretive studies 10900 Regional flood-frequency study for urban and rural streams in Wisconsin.............20 12301 Menominee trace element monitoring ......................................................................23 12303 Compilation and analysis of water-resources data near the St. Croix Reservation, Wisconsin .......................................................................24 12306 Oneida Nation hydrologic investigations..................................................................25 12309 Bedrock aquifer characterization, northern Bad River Indian Reservation..............26 12312 Delineation of the area of ground-water contribution and the times of travel to community water systems on the Menominee Indian Reservation ....................27 13300 Lake water-quality monitoring, chemical and biological monitoring of selected lakes ......................................................................................................28 14500 Fox River remediation ..............................................................................................30 16400 Technical and field support for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region V32 17202-04, Trends in water quality and stream habitat for priority watersheds..........................33 17213 17206 Best management practice evaluation.......................................................................35 17214 Single source sites.....................................................................................................37 17223 Multi-stream experimental design ............................................................................39 17229 Hydrology and water quality of three pastures in southwestern Wisconsin.............40 17230 Bridge scour on Balsam Road bridge .......................................................................42 17231 Evaluating improved street sweeping for enhancing water quality in highway runoff in Milwaukee.............................................................................43 17232 Quantification of solids loading from residential and commercial construction sites in Dane County, Wisconsin ........................................................................44 17233 Evaluation of the effectiveness of urban conservation design practices...................45 17234 Temperature modeling of urban stormwater runoff..................................................46 17235 Impacts of residential construction on stream water quality ....................................47 17236 Rock River phosphorus.............................................................................................48 17301 Assessment of the hydrology and water quality of, and phosphorus loading to, Pike Lake in Washington County .......................................................................49 17302 Miscellaneous monitoring associated with lakes......................................................50 17303 Wisconsin lakes, Green Lake tributary monitoring..................................................51 17304 Pool 8 ground-water/surface-water study .................................................................52 17305 Hydrologic investigation of Silver Lake...................................................................53 17306 Fish Lake, Dane County ...........................................................................................54 17307 Crystal Lake, Dane County.......................................................................................55 17310 Lauderdale Lakes restoration monitoring.................................................................56 17313 Assessment of phosphorus loading, winter anoxia, and stage regulation of Little St. Germain Lake, Vilas County ...........................................................57 17314 Assessment of the water quality, hydrology, and biology of Geneva Lake .............58 17317 Determination of streamflow, phosphorus, and solids loads at three sites above Sinissippi Lake in Dodge County .......................................................................59 17319 Middle Genesee Lake ground-water study ...............................................................60 17400 Western Lake Michigan drainages National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA)...........................................................................................................61 17402 Upper Illinois River Basin National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) ..........63 17406 Technical assistance in the development of regional nutrient criteria for the nation...................................................................................................................65 17500 Hydrologic and biogeochemical budgets in temperate lakes and their watersheds, northern Wisconsin.........................................................................66 18101 Assessment of the hydrology, water quality, and biology of Delavan Lake ............68 18300 Lake Michigan tributary loading ..............................................................................70 18301 Trace-metal loading to Lakes Michigan and Superior..............................................72 18900 Dane County regional hydrologic study ...................................................................73 19101 Transport of PCBs at two sites on Cedar Creek .......................................................74 19700 Florida Everglades mercury cycling .........................................................................75 20200, Mitigation of future North Fork urbanization impacts on the Pheasant 20202-03 Branch hydrologic system...................................................................................76 20201 Mitigation of future impacts of urbanization on the Badger Mill Creek hydrologic system...............................................................................................78 20400 Monitoring and evaluation of the impacts of aircraft and runway deicers on the Kinnickinnic River surface-water resources............................................79 20500 Modeling the effects of the Crandon Mine using the HSPF watershed model......... 81 20501 Developing a Geographic Information System and relational database of HSPF and FEMWATER layers used in modeling efforts related to the proposed Crandon Mine, Wisconsin ..................................................................................82 20800 Southeast Wisconsin ground water...........................................................................83 20900 Salton Sea Science Subcommittee............................................................................85 21000 Database applications................................................................................................87 21100 Wolf River sediment.................................................................................................90 21200, St. Croix National Scenic Riverway - nutrient and sediment loading and 21202 long-term water-quality monitoring....................................................................91 21300 St. Croix National Scenic Riverway - nutrient and sediment loading, water- quality monitoring and assessment partnership ..................................................93 21500 Whittlesey Creek hydrology study............................................................................95 21600 Sources of cryptosporidium in watersheds...............................................................96
Recommended publications
  • I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I

    I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I

    I I WISCONSIN I A Summary of Cooperative Water Resources Investigations I U.S. Geological Survey and I Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I 2000 USGS I science for a changing world I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I A SUMMARY OF COOPERATIVE WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water Resources Division I 8505 Research Way Middleton, Wisconsin 53562 and I WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES P.O. Box 7921 I Madison, Wisconsin 53707 I I I I I I I I i 2000 i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I A Summary of Cooperative Water-Resources Investigations « U.S. Geological Survey and Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources .- "V-._.-;; , - 2000 The cooperative program of water-resources investigations between the U.S. Geological Survey and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources began as a continuation of cooperative programs with the various State agencies which were merged to form the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. These investigations involve various aspects of research, resource evaluations, and water-quantity- and water- quality-monitoring activities. This is a brief summary report of the activities and plans for the cooperative projects during the July 1999 through June 2000 fiscal year. Each project summary includes a brief description of the objectives, approach, and progress during the 2000 fiscal year, and plans for the 2001 fiscal year.
  • Flambeau Flowage Watershed Wisconsin Watersheds

    Flambeau Flowage Watershed Wisconsin Watersheds

    Wisconsin Flambeau Flowage Watersheds Watershed 2014 Water Quality Management Plan Update Upper Chippewa Basin, Wisconsin May 2015 Th e Flambeau Flowage Watershed is located primarily in Iron County with smaller sections in northwest Vilas County and northern Price County. It has an area of 247 square miles. Th e Turtle-Flambeau Flowage is the largest water- body at 12,942 acres. Th ere are numerous other lakes. Th e Turtle River passes through many of the lakes and is the largest stream. Th e lower end of the Manitowish River is also present. Th e watershed is minimally developed, with 99% of its area consisting of forest, wetland, and open Contents water. Watershed Details . 1 Population and Land Use . 1 Hydrology . 2 Ecological Landscapes . 2 Map 1: Flambeau Flowage Watershed Historical Note . 3 Watershed Condition . 3 Watershed Details Overall Condition . 3 River and Stream Condition . 3 Population and Land Use Lake Health . 5 Wetland Health . 5 Groundwater . 6 Table 1: Flambeau Flowage Watershed Land Use Flambeau Flowage Watershed Point and Nonpoint Pollution . 7 Waters of Note . 8 Percent of (UC14) Land Use Percentages Land Use Acres Trout Waters . 8 Area 0.5% Outstanding & Exceptional Resource Forest 74,158.45 46.88% Forest 19% Waters . 8 Wetland 52,456.72 33.16% Impaired Waters. 9 Open Water & Wetland Fish Consumption . 9 Open Space 30,232.58 19.11% 47% Aquatic Invasive Species . 10 Agriculture 788.61 0.50% Ope n Wate r & Species of Special Concern . 10 Grassland 265.09 0.17% Open Space State Natural and Wildlife Areas . 10 Suburban 252.42 0.16% Urban 43.59 0.03% 33% Agriculture Watershed Actions .
  • BAD RIVER BAND of LAKE SUPERIOR TRIBE of CHIPPEWA INDIANS CHIEF BLACKBIRD CENTER Box 39 ● Odanah, Wisconsin 54861

    BAD RIVER BAND of LAKE SUPERIOR TRIBE of CHIPPEWA INDIANS CHIEF BLACKBIRD CENTER Box 39 ● Odanah, Wisconsin 54861

    BAD RIVER BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS CHIEF BLACKBIRD CENTER Box 39 ● Odanah, Wisconsin 54861 July 11, 2020 Ben Callan, WDNR Division of External Services PO Box 7921 Madison, WI 53708-7921 [email protected] RE: Comments Concerning the Enbridge Energy, LLC Line 5 Relocation around the Bad River Reservation regarding the WDNR Wetland and Water Crossing Permits and the EIS Scoping Dear Mr. Callan, As a sovereign nation with regulatory authority over downstream waters within the Bad River Watershed, on-Reservation air quality, and an interest in the use and enjoyment of the sacred waters of Anishinaabeg-Gichigami, or Lake Superior, pursuant to treaties we signed with the United States, we submit our comments related to the potential Line 5 Reroute around the Bad River Reservation proposed by Enbridge Energy, LLC (henceforth, “company” or “applicant”). The Bad River Band of Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians (henceforth, “Tribe”) is a federally-recognized Indian Tribe centered on the northern shores of Wisconsin and Madeline Island, where the Bad River Indian Reservation is located, but the Tribe also retains interest in ceded lands in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Minnesota. These lands were ceded to the United States government in the Treaties of 18371, 18422, and 18543. The proposed Line 5 Reroute falls within these ceded lands where the Tribe has retained usufructuary rights to use treaty resources. In addition, it threatens the water quality of the Tribe’s waters downstream, over which the Tribe has regulatory authority as a sovereign nation and as delegated by the federal government under the Clean Water Act.
  • 14-Bad-Montreal BCA Regional Unit Background Chapter

    14-Bad-Montreal BCA Regional Unit Background Chapter

    14. Bad-Montreal HEALTHY WATERS REPORT CARD OFFSHORE NA ISLANDS A NEARSHORE C COASTAL WETLANDS B EMBAYMENTS & C COASTAL TERRESTRIAL A+ INSHORE TRIBUTARIES & C OVERALL B WATERSHEDS Report card denotes general condition/health of each biodiversity target in the region based on condition/stress indices. See introduction to the regional summaries. A Ecologically desirable status; requires little intervention for Very maintenance Good B Within acceptable range of variation; may require some Good intervention for maintenance. C Outside of the range of acceptable variation and requires Fair management. If unchecked, the biodiversity target may be vulnerable to serious degradation. D Allowing the biodiversity target to remain in this condition for Poor an extended period will make restoration or preventing extirpation practically impossible. Unknown Insufficient information. Summary/ Description The Bad River Kakagon Slough complex. Photo The Bad-Montreal region is located along the southern supplied by Ryan O’Connor, WDNR. Photo taken by shore of Lake Superior, and is 3,764 km2 in size, including Christina Isenring, WDNR. the associated nearshore waters. The regional unit extends along the shore from just east of Ashland to the mouth of the Montreal River, and the state boundary line between Wisconsin and Michigan. In this Biodiversity Conservation Assessment the Beartrap Creek subwatershed is considered part of the Lower Bad River subwatershed and the Bad-Montreal regional unit. This regional unit delineation reflects local management boundaries as adopted and managed by the Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (N. Tillison, pers. comm., April 26 2013).
  • Fishing Regulations, 2020-2021, Available Online, from Your License Distributor, Or Any DNR Service Center

    Fishing Regulations, 2020-2021, Available Online, from Your License Distributor, Or Any DNR Service Center

    Wisconsin Fishing.. it's fun and easy! To use this pamphlet, follow these 5 easy steps: Restrictions: Be familiar with What's New on page 4 and the License Requirements 1 and Statewide Fishing Restrictions on pages 8-11. Trout fishing: If you plan to fish for trout, please see the separate inland trout 2 regulations booklet, Guide to Wisconsin Trout Fishing Regulations, 2020-2021, available online, from your license distributor, or any DNR Service Center. Special regulations: Check for special regulations on the water you will be fishing 3 in the section entitled Special Regulations-Listed by County beginning on page 28. Great Lakes, Winnebago System Waters, and Boundary Waters: If you are 4 planning to fish on the Great Lakes, their tributaries, Winnebago System waters or waters bordering other states, check the appropriate tables on pages 64–76. Statewide rules: If the water you will be fishing is not found in theSpecial Regulations- 5 Listed by County and is not a Great Lake, Winnebago system, or boundary water, statewide rules apply. See the regulation table for General Inland Waters on pages 62–63 for seasons, length and bag limits, listed by species. ** This pamphlet is an interpretive summary of Wisconsin’s fishing laws and regulations. For complete fishing laws and regulations, including those that are implemented after the publica- tion of this pamphlet, consult the Wisconsin State Statutes Chapter 29 or the Administrative Code of the Department of Natural Resources. Consult the legislative website - http://docs. legis.wi.gov - for more information. For the most up-to-date version of this pamphlet, go to dnr.wi.gov search words, “fishing regulations.
  • Wisconsin's Wetland Gems

    Wisconsin's Wetland Gems

    100 WISCONSIN WETLAND GEMS ® Southeast Coastal Region NE-10 Peshtigo River Delta o r SC-1 Chiwaukee Prairie NE-11 Point Beach & Dunes e i SC-2 Des Plaines River NE-12 Rushes Lake MINNESOTA k e r a p Floodplain & Marshes NE-13 Shivering Sands & L u SC-3 Germantown Swamp Connected Wetlands S SC-4 Renak-Polak Woods NE-14 West Shore Green Bay SU-6 SU-9 SC-5 Root River Riverine Forest Wetlands SU-8 SU-11 SC-6 Warnimont Bluff Fens NE-15 Wolf River Bottoms SU-1 SU-12 SU-3 SU-7 Southeast Region North Central Region SU-10 SE-1 Beulah Bog NC-1 Atkins Lake & Hiles Swamp SU-5 NW-4 SU-4 SE-2 Cedarburg Bog NC-2 Bear Lake Sedge Meadow NW-2 NW-8 MICHIGAN SE-3 Cherokee Marsh NC-3 Bogus Swamp NW-1 NW-5 SU-2 SE-4 Horicon Marsh NC-4 Flambeau River State Forest NW-7 SE-5 Huiras Lake NC-11 NC-12 NC-5 Grandma Lake NC-9 SE-6 Lulu Lake NC-6 Hunting River Alders NW-10 NC-13 SE-7 Milwaukee River NC-7 Jump-Mondeaux NC-8 Floodplain Forest River Floodplain NW-6 NC-10 SE-8 Nichols Creek NC-8 Kissick Alkaline Bog NW-3 NC-5 NW-9 SE-9 Rush Lake NC-9 Rice Creek NC-4 NC-1 SE-10 Scuppernong River Area NC-10 Savage-Robago Lakes NC-2 NE-7 SE-11 Spruce Lake Bog NC-11 Spider Lake SE-12 Sugar River NC-12 Toy Lake Swamp NC-6 NC-7 Floodplain Forest NC-13 Turtle-Flambeau- NC-3 NE-6 SE-13 Waubesa Wetlands Manitowish Peatlands W-7 NE-9 WISCONSIN’S WETLAND GEMS SE-14 White River Marsh NE-2 Northwest Region NE-8 Central Region NE-10 NE-4 NW-1 Belden Swamp W-5 NE-12 WH-5 Mink River Estuary—Clint Farlinger C-1 Bass Lake Fen & Lunch NW-2 Black Lake Bog NE-13 NE-14 ® Creek Sedge Meadow NW-3 Blomberg Lake C-4 WHAT ARE WETLAND GEMS ? C-2 Bear Bluff Bog NW-4 Blueberry Swamp WH-2WH-7 C-6 NE-15 NE-1 Wetland Gems® are high quality habitats that represent the wetland riches—marshes, swamps, bogs, fens and more— C-3 Black River NW-5 Brule Glacial Spillway W-1 WH-2 that historically made up nearly a quarter of Wisconsin’s landscape.
  • A Journey to the Wetlands of the Penokee Hills, Caroline Lake, and the Kakagon/Bad River Sloughs

    A Journey to the Wetlands of the Penokee Hills, Caroline Lake, and the Kakagon/Bad River Sloughs

    A Journey to the Wetlands of the Penokee Hills, Caroline Lake, and the Kakagon/Bad River Sloughs Join Wisconsin Wetlands Association’s Executive Director Tracy Hames and the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa on this 2-day journey to one of Wisconsin’s highest quality and most threatened watersheds. This top-to-bottom tour will introduce you to the wetland resources of the Bad River Watershed. We will explore headwater wetlands in the Penokee Hills at the site of a proposed iron mine, and visit the tribe’s extensive wild rice beds in the internationally-recognized Kakagon/Bad River Sloughs estuary along the shores of Lake Superior. We will discuss the role these wetlands play regulating the water throughout the watershed, the importance of these wetlands and rice beds to the Bad River People, and the potential impacts to these resources of a proposed iron mine. Choose from three tours: Tour 1 July 17-18, 2014 Tour 2 July 23-24, 2014 Tour 3 September 18-19, 2014 Tour Guides: Tracy Hames, Executive Director, Wisconsin Wetlands Association (all three tours) Mike Wiggins, Jr., Tribal Chairman, Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa (first tour) Naomi Tillison, Water Program Director, Bad River Tribal Natural Resources (2nd & 3rd tour) Cinnamon fern in upper watershed wetland (photo by Tracy Hames) Itinerary (subject to adjustment as needed) We’ll be traveling to the Penokee Hills the morning of first day of each tour and visiting the upper watershed in the afternoon. That evening we’ll have dinner at the Deepwater Grille in Ashland.
  • Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 93/Friday, May 13, 2011/Notices

    Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 93/Friday, May 13, 2011/Notices

    28074 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2011 / Notices Lac du Flambeau Reservation of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Wisconsin; Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin; Lac du Flambeau Band of Wisconsin; Oneida Tribe of Indians of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of the National Park Service Wisconsin; Red Cliff Band of Lake Lac du Flambeau Reservation of [2253–665] Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin; Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin; St. Croix Chippewa Indians Wisconsin; Red Cliff Band of Lake Notice of Inventory Completion: Utah of Wisconsin; Sokaogon Chippewa Superior Chippewa Indians of Museum of Natural History, Salt Lake Community, Wisconsin; and Wisconsin; St. Croix Chippewa City, UT Stockbridge Munsee Community, Community, Wisconsin; and Sokaogon Wisconsin. AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. Chippewa Community, Wisconsin. In 1968 or earlier, human remains ACTION: Notice. representing a minimum of one Representatives of any other Indian individual were recovered during tribe that believes itself to be culturally Notice is here given in accordance installation of a septic tank with a affiliated with the human remains with the Native American Graves backhoe at the Pine Point Resort, should contact William Green, Director, Protection and Repatriation Act Pickerel Lake, Ainsworth, Langlade Logan Museum of Anthropology, Beloit (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the County, WI. The remains were recorded College, Beloit, WI 53511, telephone completion of an inventory of human remains in the possession and control of as ‘‘Historic Indian,’’ suggesting funerary (608) 363–2119, fax (608) 363–7144, the Utah Museum of Natural History, objects may have been present, although before June 13, 2011.
  • Archaeology News Volume 26 Number 2, Online Supplement February 2009

    Archaeology News Volume 26 Number 2, Online Supplement February 2009

    Electronic Archaeology News Volume 26 Number 2, Online Supplement February 2009 Public Field School at Sand Lake Coulee During the summer of 2008, MVAC conducted extensive excavations at the Lower Sand Lake site on Onalaska’s northeast side (see Archaeology News, February 2009). The UW-La Crosse Field School and the MVAC field crew excavated the site under the direction of Wendy Holtz-Leith and Joe Tiffany. MVAC archaeologist Connie Arzigian joined Wendy in the field for one week in July to lead the Public Field School. Participants included long-time MVAC volunteers Bill Gresens and John Morris along with other adult attendees, high school, and middle school stu- MVAC at the dents. The public field school continued work on the Lower Sand Lake site, which University will also be the site for the 2009 Public Field School. of Wisconsin - La Crosse 1725 State Street La Crosse, WI 54601 www.uwlax.edu/mvac Lab work was conducted at the end of each day. High school students staying in the UW-L dorms were supervised by Miranda Alexander (back). The electronic supplement of Archaeology News is published Middle school students joined the three times each year to inform dig for two days. MVAC members of new finds and upcoming events. Members who would like a hard copy of the Digging a unit at 47Lc45. supplement mailed to their homes can contact me at (608) 785-8454 or [email protected]. Enjoy the newsletter! Jean Dowiasch, Editor The 2008 Public Field School. 2008 Midwest Archaeological Conference The 54th Annual Midwest Archaeological Conference UWL student Laura (MAC) was held at the Hyatt Regency Hotel in Milwau- Tomcek, Wendy Holtz- kee.
  • A Lake Winnebago Success Story

    A Lake Winnebago Success Story

    WISCONSIN FISHING By The Numbers 15,000 lakes 42,000 miles of streams and rivers 1.4 million anglers 88 million fish caught by anglers $2.75 billion in economic activity $200 million in tax revenues for local and state governments 30,000+ jobs 21 million days that anglers fished 12 million fish stocked Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service, American Sportfishing Association, 2008 A Lake Winnebago success story viding fishing opportunities for local resi- Dear “Cleaner and clearer”, the lake dents, destination fishing for out-of-state WISCONSIN aficionados, and an annual $234 million is becoming a walleye factory. economic boost for the five counties sur- ANGLER rounding Lake Winnebago and the other OSHKOSH. — Twenty years ago wall- lakes in the Winnebago chain -- Butte des Welcome to Wisconsin – home of the best eye fishing on Lake Winnebago stunk. Morts, Winneconne, and Poygan. The Fish are Waiting Literally. The secrets of that success? Arrowood and most diverse fishing in the country. We Wisconsin Anglers --- Plan those special days on the offer more waters than dedicated anglers Scant rain and snow in the late 1980s and state fisheries biologists point to three could fish in several lifetimes…an incred- dried up walleye reproduction and the main factors: water with the 2012 A Year of Fish calendar. ible array of fish to catch…and some rare fishing with it while goosing the growth Calendar includes: ones just to appreciate. Fishing is a corner- of smelly algae blooms, recalls Mike Ar- 1) DNR, local governments and citizen Important fishing dates, moon stone of Wisconsin’s culture and economy.
  • LAKES of the HURON BASIN: THEIR RECORD of RUNOFF from the LAURENTIDE ICE Sheetq[

    LAKES of the HURON BASIN: THEIR RECORD of RUNOFF from the LAURENTIDE ICE Sheetq[

    Quaterna~ ScienceReviews, Vol. 13, pp. 891-922, 1994. t Pergamon Copyright © 1995 Elsevier Science Ltd. Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved. 0277-3791/94 $26.00 0277-3791 (94)00126-X LAKES OF THE HURON BASIN: THEIR RECORD OF RUNOFF FROM THE LAURENTIDE ICE SHEETq[ C.F. MICHAEL LEWIS,* THEODORE C. MOORE, JR,t~: DAVID K. REA, DAVID L. DETTMAN,$ ALISON M. SMITH§ and LARRY A. MAYERII *Geological Survey of Canada, Box 1006, Dartmouth, N.S., Canada B2 Y 4A2 tCenter for Great Lakes and Aquatic Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A. ::Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A. §Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, 0H44242, U.S.A. IIDepartment of Geomatics and Survey Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B., Canada E3B 5A3 Abstract--The 189'000 km2 Hur°n basin is central in the catchment area °f the present Q S R Lanrentian Great Lakes that now drain via the St. Lawrence River to the North Atlantic Ocean. During deglaciation from 21-7.5 ka BP, and owing to the interactions of ice margin positions, crustal rebound and regional topography, this basin was much more widely connected hydrologi- cally, draining by various routes to the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean, and receiving over- ~ flows from lakes impounded north and west of the Great Lakes-Hudson Bay drainage divide. /~ Early ice-marginal lakes formed by impoundment between the Laurentide Ice Sheet and the southern margin of the basin during recessions to interstadial positions at 15.5 and 13.2 ka BE In ~ ~i each of these recessions, lake drainage was initially southward to the Mississippi River and Gulf of ~ Mexico.
  • Glacial Lakes Around Michigan

    Glacial Lakes Around Michigan

    The Glacial Lakes around Michigan By William R. Farrand, University of Michigan Bulletin 4, revised 1988 Geological Survey Division Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Bulletin 4 - Glacial Lakes Around Michigan By William R. Farrand, University of Michigan, 1967 revised 1998 Illustrated by Kathline Clahassey, University of Michigan Published by Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. Geological Survey Division Contents Preface............................................................................................................................................ 3 Abstract........................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Was There A Glacier?..................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 1: The modem Great Lakes have a water surface area greater than 95,000 square miles, a total drainage area of about 295,000 square miles, and a shore line 8,300 miles long. ................................................................................................4 Figure 2: Features originating at a glacier front occur in a definite order. ...................................................................................5 Figure 3: Landforms of continental glaciation are unmistakable. Compare with figure 2 ............................................................5