DOCSLIB.ORG

Speedway Redevelopment Area 2 Master Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Speedway Redevelopment Area 2 Master Plan SPEEDWAY REDEVELOPMENT AREA 2 MASTER PLAN AUGUST 28, 2014 Adopted by Town Council, September 8, 2014 REDEVELOPMENT AREA 2 MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................1 Acknowledgements .................................................................................3 Purpose of Master Plan ...........................................................................4 VISION ....................................................................................................11 Vision Introduction ...............................................................................12 Area 2: Existing Conditions....................................................................12 Area 2: Issues ......................................................................................13 Site Context Map ..................................................................................15 Vision ..................................................................................................16 Vision Forming into Goals ......................................................................18 Goals ..................................................................................................18 OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................21 Objective Overview ...............................................................................22 Land-Use Objectives .............................................................................25 Transportation Objectives ......................................................................39 Economic Development and Policy Objectives .........................................55 APPENDIX ...............................................................................................67 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ............................................................................69 COMMUNITY PROFILE .............................................................................77 DETAILED STUDIES .................................................................................89 Blight Study .........................................................................................90 Market Analysis ....................................................................................95 MAPS ....................................................................................................115 ii INTRODUCTION Acknowledgements Speedway Redevelopment Commission Speedway Town Council Vince Noblet, President Eileen Fisher Benny Grove, Vice President Jeff S. Hartman Ron Fisher Lucinda Hillmer* William Jones David Lindsey Nancy Lawrence Gary L. Raikes Scott Harris, Executive Director Bill Suffel Ian Nicolini, Town Manager Barbara Lawrence, Town Manager* Monty Combs, Clerk Treasurer Redevelopment Area 2 Steering Committee Betsy Combs John Dizney Dean Farmer Bill Jones Barbara Lawrence Nancy Lawrence Roger Williams Consultant American Structurepoint 7260 Shadeland Station Indianapolis, Indiana 46256 317.547.5580 www.structurepoint.com *Denotes participation during planning process but not at time of adoption. 3 INTRODUCTION REDEVELOPMENT AREA 2 MASTER PLAN PURPOSE OF MASTER PLAN The Speedway Redevelopment Commission (SRC) was authorized under the Indi- ana law as a result of actions of the 2005 Indiana Legislature. The SRC officially began its organizational activity on July 1, 2005, and since that time, the SRC has conducted a series of public meetings to discuss a broad range of issues re- lated to the role, activities, and projects of the SRC in pursuit of redevelopment within the Town of Speedway. The SRC undertakes its role in the community in accordance with Indiana statues and the following stated goals for all its redevelopment efforts: » To restore economic growth to the property tax base to the Civil Town of Speedway » To eliminate urban blight to the Civil Town of Speedway » To encourage reinvestment and property improvement within the Civil Town of Speedway » To enable the Civil Town of Speedway to capture new jobs, as well as retain existing jobs by being economically competitive in the Central Indiana mar- ketplace » To encourage and stimulate economic development in the Civil Town of Speedway » To stabilize and protect property values within the Civil Town of Speedway, including residential, commercial, and industrial property » To generate redevelopment in a manner that overcomes - to the extent pos- sible - the limitation of old designs, layouts, and development standards in order to redefine the Civil Town of Speedway as a 21st Century community, which simultaneously recognizes the heritage and embraces its future. Since the Town of Speedway is landlocked and cannot grow through annexation or greenfield development, Speedway must turn to redevelopment as a means of ensuring its future economic viability and controlling the cost of government for its citizens. The SRC acknowledges that redevelopment is one of the most diffi- cult and sensitive forms of community development and, therefore, must address growth through careful planning and a long term commitment to change for the betterment of all of Speedway. Unless there is substantial economic reinvestment within the Town of Speedway, the economic future of the community and prosper- ity of its citizens is threatened. The Civil Town of Speedway recognized that the first redevelopment area, Re- development Area No.1, known as the Speed Zone, could not realize complete success without combating blight in other areas of the community. In order to achieve the goals and objectives of the Speed Zone Plan, the SRC committed it- self to implement revitalization and redevelopment actions necessary to redevelop Redevelopment Area 2. The purpose of this redevelopment plan is to provide a general set of strategies for redeveloping the area that will ultimately help the community to overcome and correct those issues that have contributed to blight. The redevelopment plan addresses a plan to improve the area in areas of lack of development, cessation of growth, and deterioration. This section outlines a summary of findings based upon the following statutory criteria: 1. Lack of development 4 REDEVELOPMENT AREA 2 MASTER PLAN INTRODUCTION 2. Cessation of growth 3. Deterioration of improvements 4. Character of the occupancy 5. Age 6. Obsolescence 7. Substandard buildings 8. Other factors demonstrating need It is estimated that between 2000 and 2005, both the Civil Town of Speedway and Redevelopment Area 2 have experienced population declines of 1.1 percent and 1.2 percent respectively. During this same time period the Indianapolis met- ropolitan area has experienced an estimated population increase of 6.6 percent. This population loss shows a downward pressure on new housing opportunities and decreasing demand within Redevelopment Area 2. This population loss also has the effect of reducing retail demand for businesses along the Crawfordsville Road corridor. ISSUES identification FOR REDEVELOPMENT AREA 2 Occupancy A building survey was conducted to determine building and property conditions. One of the variables documented was occupancy status. Although 2.5 percent of the buildings within Redevelopment Area 2 were completely vacant, 50.6 percent were partially vacant. These vacancies are seen in both the residential and com- mercial uses within Redevelopment Area 2. It was also noted that uses in some of the occupied commercial spaces included low order retail such as liquor stores and check cashing establishments. These tenants often target low rent areas to locate their businesses. Zoning The usage of zoning by a municipality is established to protect its residents’ health, safety, and general welfare. Under this definition and regulatory practice, government officials are able to restrict the location of an undesirable use, but not to restrict that type of use all together. As seen in many cases regulating adult- oriented uses, a municipality may restrict the location of an undesirable use, but must also give them the opportunity to operate in alternative locations within the community.[4] Since standard regulatory powers and market forces will not neces- sarily combat undesirable uses, it is necessary to employ redevelopment powers to encourage changes to the land use patterns within Redevelopment Area 2. Building Character The building types within a community can often help or deter the overall charac- ter of a community due to their lack of upkeep in the property, type of business, or attracting additional undesirable businesses. The majority of these building types were obsolete motels and liquor stores. A majority of the motels received an overall condition rating of fair or poor on the Building Inventory Survey. According to the notes of the Building Inventory Survey, these hotels are in need of major 5 INTRODUCTION REDEVELOPMENT AREA 2 MASTER PLAN exterior repairs, such as paint, roof replacements, structural replacements and parking resurfacing. All of the liquor stores within the redevelopment area were given a fair overall condition rating reflecting the need of improvements to those properties. Character of occupancy also refers to the effect of a business on the surrounding area. This effect can include its impact on the general welfare of the community’s citizenry. Off-premise alcohol stores, or liquor stores in which the consumption of alcohol is not within the establishment, have been linked to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Track Record of Prior Experience of the Senior Cobalt Team
    Track Record of Prior Experience of the Senior Cobalt Team Dedicated Executives PROPERTY City Square Property Type Responsibility Company/Client Term Feet COLORADO Richard Taylor Aurora Mall Aurora, CO 1,250,000 Suburban Mall Property Management - New Development DeBartolo Corp 7 Years CEO Westland Center Denver, CO 850,000 Suburban Mall Property Management and $30 million Disposition May Centers/ Centermark 9 Years North Valley Mall Denver, CO 700,000 Suburban Mall Property Management and Redevelopment First Union 3 Years FLORIDA Tyrone Square Mall St Petersburg, FL 1,180,000 Suburban Mall Property Management DeBartolo Corp 3 Years University Mall Tampa, FL 1,300,000 Suburban Mall Property Management and New Development DeBartolo Corp 2 Years Property Management, Asset Management, New Development Altamonte Mall Orlando, FL 1,200,000 Suburban Mall DeBartolo Corp and O'Connor Group 1 Year and $125 million Disposition Edison Mall Ft Meyers, FL 1,000,000 Suburban Mall Property Management and Redevelopment The O'Connor Group 9 Years Volusia Mall Daytona Beach ,FL 950,000 Suburban Mall Property and Asset Management DeBartolo Corp 1 Year DeSoto Square Mall Bradenton, FL 850,000 Suburban Mall Property Management DeBartolo Corp 1 Year Pinellas Square Mall St Petersburg, FL 800,000 Suburban Mall Property Management and New Development DeBartolo Corp 1 Year EastLake Mall Tampa, FL 850,000 Suburban Mall Property Management and New Development DeBartolo Corp 1 Year INDIANA Lafayette Square Mall Indianapolis, IN 1,100,000 Suburban Mall Property Management
    [Show full text]
  • Largest Indianapolis-Area Commercial Property Management Firms (Ranked by Gross Leasable Area Managed Locally (1))
    Largest Indianapolis-Area Commercial Property Management Firms (Ranked by gross leasable area managed locally (1)) LOCAL FTE: BROKERS / PERCENT LOCAL PROPERTIES AGENTS HQ LOCATION RANK FIRM GLA MANAGED(1): OFFICE MANAGED HEAD(S) OF LOCAL EMPLOYEES: OF OWNERS: ESTAB. 2009 ADDRESS LOCALLY RETAIL LARGEST INDIANAPOLIS-AREA % OF SPACE OPERATIONS, TITLE(S) PROPERTY MGT. % INDIANA LOCALLY rank TELEPHONE / FAX / WEB SITE NATIONALLY INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES MANAGED OWNED BY FIRM LOCAL DIRECTOR(S) TOTAL % OTHER HQ CITY Cassidy Turley (2) 29.7 million 30 Keystone at the Crossing, 156 Jeffrey L. Henry, 48 26 1918 One American Square, Suite 1300, 46282 420.0 million 4 Precedent Office Park, 0 managing principal 142 74 St. Louis 1 (317) 634-6363 / fax (317) 639-0504 / cassidyturley.com 66 Castleton Park Timothy J. Michel 199 1 Duke Realty Corp. 28.5 million 20 AllPoints Midwest Bldg. 1, 187 Don Dunbar, EVP; 10 DND 1972 600 E. 96th St., Suite 100, 46240 141.9 million 0 Lebanon Building 12, 87 Charlie E. Podell, SVP 20 DND Indianapolis 2 (317) 808-6000 / fax (317) 808-6770 / dukerealty.com 80 Lebanon Building 2 Ryan Rothacker; Chris Yeakey 400 2 CB Richard Ellis 13.0 million DND Intech Park, DND David L. Reed, 33 DND 1981 101 W. Washington St., Suite 1000E, 46204 11.5 million DND Capital Center, DND managing director 31 DND Los Angeles 3 (317) 269-1000 / fax (317) 637-4404 / cbre.com DND Metropolis Andy Banister 99 4 Prologis 10.5 million DND 715 AirTech Parkway, 55 Elizabeth A. Kauchak, DND DND 1994 8102 Zionsville Road, 46268 DND DND 281 AirTech Parkway, 100 vice president, market officer DND DND Denver 4 (317) 228-6200 / fax (317) 228-6201 / prologis.com 100 558 AirTech Parkway Susan Harvey DND 3 Kite Realty Group Trust 8.8 million 57 Eli Lilly and Co., 75 John A.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Session Agenda Indianapolis-Marion County Public
    Executive Session Agenda Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library Notice Of An Executive Session November 26, 2018 Library Board Members are Hereby Notified That An Executive Session Of the Board Will Be Held At The Franklin Road Branch Library 5550 South Franklin Road, 46239 At 6:00 P.M. For the Purpose Of Considering The Following Agenda Items Dated This 21st Day of November, 2018 JOANNE M. SANDERS President of the Library Board -- Executive Session Agenda-- 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call Executive Session Agenda pg. 2 3. Discussion a. Pursuant to IC 5-14-1.5-6.1(b)(6), to receive information concerning an individual’s alleged misconduct, and to discuss, before a determination, the individual’s status as an employee. 4. Adjournment Library Board Meeting Agenda Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library Notice Of The Regular Meeting November 26, 2018 Library Board Members Are Hereby Notified That The Regular Meeting Of The Board Will Be Held At The Franklin Road Library Branch 5550 S. Franklin Road At 6:30 P.M. For The Purpose Of Considering The Following Agenda Items Dated This 21st Day Of November, 2018 JOANNE M. SANDERS President of the Library Board -- Regular Meeting Agenda -- 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call Library Board Meeting Agenda pg. 2 3. Branch Manager’s Report – Jill Wetnight, Franklin Road Branch Manager, will provide an update on their services to the community. (enclosed) 4. Public Comment and Communications a. Public Comment The Public has been invited to the Board Meeting. Hearing of petitions to the Board by Individuals or Delegations.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology for Environmental Planning . in Marion County
    GEOLOGY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING . GEOLOGY--:~ .\RY IN MARION COUNTY, INDIANA SURVEY Special Report 19 c . 3 State of)pdiana Department of N'.atural Resources GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OF THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY JOHN B. PATION, State Geologist MAURICE E. BIGGS, Assistant State Geologist MARY BETH FOX, Mineral Statistician COAL AND INDUSTRIAL MINERALS SECTION GEOLOGY SECTION DONALD D. CARR, Geologist and Head ROBERT H. SHAVER, Paleontologist and Head CURTIS H. AULT, Geologist and Associate Head HENRY H. GRAY, Head Stratigrapher PEl-YUAN CHEN, Geologist N. K. BLEUER, Glacial Geologist DONALD L. EGGERT, Geologist EDWIN J. HARTKE, Environmental Geologist GORDON S. FRASER, Geologist JOHN R. HILL, Glacial Geologist DENVER HARPER, Geologist CARL B. REXROAD, Paleontologist WALTER A. HASENMUELLER, Geologist NELSON R. SHAFFER, Geologist GEOPHYSICS SECTION PAUL IRWIN, Geological Assistant MAURICE E. BIGGS, Geophysicist and Head ROBERT F. BLAKELY, Geophysicist JOSEPH F. WHALEY, Geophysicist DRAFTINGANDPHOTOGRAPHYSECTION JOHN R. HELMS, Driller WILLIAM H. MORAN, Chief Draftsman and Head SAMUEL L. RIDDLE, Geophysical Assistant RICHARDT. HILL, Geological Draftsman ROGER L. PURCELL, Senior Geological Draftsman PETROLEUM SECTION GEORGE R. RINGER, Photographer G. L. CARPENTER, Geologist and Head WILBUR E. STALIONS, Artist-Draftsman ANDREW J. HREHA, Geologist BRIAN D. KEITH, Geologist EDUCATIONAL SERVICES SECTION STANLEY J. KELLER, Geologist R. DEE RARICK, Geologist and Head DAN M. SULLIVAN, Geologist JAMES T. CAZEE, Geological Assistant
    [Show full text]
  • Decentralization of Metropolitan Government: Reform in Indianapolis
    University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Volume 4 1970 Decentralization of Metropolitan Government: Reform in Indianapolis Charles T. Richardson University of Michigan Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr Part of the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Charles T. Richardson, Decentralization of Metropolitan Government: Reform in Indianapolis, 4 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 311 (1970). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol4/iss2/8 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DECENTRALIZATION OF METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT: REFORM IN INDIANAPOLIS In every city the people are divided into three sorts; the very rich, the very poor and those who are between them.... The most perfect political community must be amongst those who are in the middle rank, and those states are best in- stituted wherein these are a large and more respectable part, if possible, than both the other; or, if that cannot be, at least than either of them separate; so that being thrown into the balance it may prevent either scale from preponderating. -Aristotle, Politics, Book IV, Chapter XI, pp. 126-27. I. INTRODUCTION The local government of Indianapolis-Marion County, Indiana, has recently undergone a major reorganization. As of January 1, 1970, the Indianapolis city limits were expanded to the Marion County lines, and a new unified legislative and executive structure replaced the old city, county, and special district authorities.1 The enactment was prompted by many of the same problems facing all urban centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Unigov Handbook a Book of Factual Information About Indianapolis, Indiana
    Unigov Handbook A Book of Factual Information about Indianapolis, Indiana ©2021. This publication has been compiled by: 1 About the League of Women Voters The League of Women Voters (LWV) is a nonpartisan organization dedicated to the promotion of informed and active participation of citizens in government. It influences public policy through education and advocacy with membership open to men and women 16 and older. The LWV directs its attention solely to matters of government and the individual’s responsibility in that government. The LWV is active in voter education and provides impartial voting information. Alongside the national organization, the LWV of Indianapolis chapter was founded in 1920 and has been active ever since. It began publishing the Unigov Handbook in 1980 with additional printings and editions in 1982, 1985, 1994, 2001, 2011, and 2016. In 2021, the Handbook moved to a digital format as part of the Digital Encyclopedia of Indianapolis. To learn more about the history of the LWV of Indianapolis, read its entry in the Encyclopedia. 2 Preface What is Unigov? How does it work? How can I participate knowledgeably in local government? This Unigov Handbook was designed to inform you about the government in Indianapolis, Indiana. It was compiled, researched, and edited by League of Women Voters members and its community partners and is intended to provide accurate, nonpartisan information. We hope the Handbook will contribute to the understanding and involvement of citizens and be a useful resource to students. In 2020, the LWV was asked to update the Handbook and include it as part of the Digital Encyclopedia of Indiana.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Reforms Begin to Take Shape at Indianapolis, Evansville Bosma Sees 2007 Local Restructuring by BRIAN A
    V 12, No 13 Thursday, Nov. 10, 2005 Government reforms begin to take shape at Indianapolis, Evansville Bosma sees 2007 local restructuring By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS - The month of November 2005 may well go down in history “This is sad. This is just as a key period in the 21st Century reform initiatives of state and local government. sad. There’s just Next Monday night, the Indianapolis City-County Council will vote on a merg- er of the city police and the Marion nothing much to find.” County Sheriff Department. It is one of –– Vanderburgh County the biggest unfinished pieces of busi- ness left over from the historic Unigov Sheriff Brad Ellsworth, on passage more than three decades ago. Wednesday as tornado vic- Deputy Mayor Steve Campbell refused to predict whether the merger tims returned to their was a done deal. “We’re optimistic,” destroyed homes, to the Campbell said. “I can’t speak for the sheriff, but we’ve talked to him and his Evansville Courier & Press people and the changes made by the council committee reflect those changes.” Mayor Bart Peterson told the Indianapolis Star, "It's better than what I The Howey Political Report is published proposed. It's a great example of how by NewsLink Inc. It was founded in 1994. the public process is supposed to work." Brian A. Howey, Publisher Marion County Democratic Marion County Sheriff Frank Anderson is the key Chairman Ed Treacy, asked if Anderson Mark Schoeff Jr., Washington Writer man on the Hoosier government reform front. Jack E. Howey, Editor and Peterson are on the same page, County Chairman Ed Treacy looks on.
    [Show full text]
  • Senior Lawyers Project Collection, 1968-1991
    Collection # M 0574 CT 0460-0561, 0518-0567, BV 2597-2604, 2616-2620 SENIOR LAWYERS PROJECT RECORDS, 1968–1991 Collection Information Historical/ Biographical Sketch Scope and Content Note Box and Folder Listing Cataloging Information Processed by Charles Latham 6 February 1991, 15 May 1992 Revised by Glenn McMullen, 20 April 2000 Updated 25 January 2005 Manuscript and Visual Collections Department William Henry Smith Memorial Library Indiana Historical Society 450 West Ohio Street Indianapolis, IN 46202-3269 www.indianahistory.org COLLECTION INFORMATION VOLUME OF COLLECTION: 5 manuscript boxes, 13 bound volumes, 107 audiocassettes (5.5 linear foot) COLLECTION DATES: 1968-1991 PROVENANCE: Senior Lawyers Project, Philip V. Scarpino, Director, Public History, Indiana University, 425 Agnes St., Indianapolis IN 46202; September 1989, 7 May 1992 RESTRICTIONS: None REPRODUCTION RIGHTS: Permission to reproduce or publish material in this collection must be obtained from the Indiana Historical Society. ALTERNATE FORMATS: Transcript and audiocassette RELATED HOLDINGS: None ACCESSION NUMBER: 1989.0593, 1992.0491 NOTES: HISTORICAL/BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH The Senior Lawyers Project was jointly sponsored by the Senior Lawyers Division of the Indianapolis Bar Association, the Indiana Historical Society, and the public history program at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI). It was funded by grants from the latter two organizations. The purpose of the project was to record the memories of lawyers connected with recent historical events. The two areas first chosen for investigations were rural electrification in Indiana, and Unigov, the united government for Indianapolis and Marion County which was put into effect in the 1970s. Interviews were conducted by Philip V. Scarpino, director of the public history program in the School of Liberal Arts at IUPUI, and Linda Weintraut, graduate student in public history.
    [Show full text]
  • INDIANAPOLIS-MARION COUNTY CITY-COUNTY COUNCIL a Study
    INDIANAPOLIS-MARION COUNTY CITY-COUNTY COUNCIL A Study of Council Effectiveness EVALUATION OF INDIANAPOLIS’ CENTERS FOR WORKING FAMILIES NETWORK Report forFebruary the United 28, Way 2020 of Central Indiana JULY 2018 | 18-XXX AUTHORS Cullen C. Merritt, Ph.D. & Amanda Rutherford, Ph.D. Prepared for the Indianapolis-Marion County City-County Council CONTENTS Part 1: Overview 1 Introduction 2 Methodology 6 Part 2: Results 13 Awareness of the council 14 Purpose of the council 16 Prior interactions with the council 17 Councilor salary 18 Trust in government 20 Council representation 22 Public engagement 24 Issues facing Indianapolis/Marion County & the council 26 Summary of findings 27 Part 3: Recommendations 29 Recommendations 30 Part 4: Appendices 33 ADDITIONAL CONTENT PART 1: OVERVIEW 3 FIGURE 1. Share of revenue by source 3 FIGURE 2. Share of appropriations by source 4 TABLE 1. Peer consolidated council comparison 7 FIGURE 3. Race/ethnicity of survey respondents vs. census estimates 7 FIGURE 4. Gender of survey respondents vs. census estimates 7 FIGURE 5. Education of survey respondents vs. census estimates 8 FIGURE 6. Employment of survey respondents vs. census estimates 8 FIGURE 7. Household income of survey respondents vs. census estimates 8 FIGURE 8. 2016 local election voter turnout vs. reported turnout of ever voting in local elections among survey respondents 9 FIGURE 9. 2016 state election voter turnout vs. reported turnout of ever voting in state elections among survey respondents 9 FIGURE 10. 2016 federal election voter turnout vs. reported turnout among survey respondents 10 FIGURE 11. Overview of focus group participants PART 2: RESULTS 14 FIGURE 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Steve Ferguson • Member Spotlight: City Securities Corporation
    Magazine of the Indiana Chamber of Commerce November/December 2013 RISK MITIGATION: [risk] [mit-i-gey-shuhn] noun We help companies protect their reputation and mitigate risk by providing a comprehensive range of legally defensible third-party testing and engineering services. Industry groups as diverse as aerospace, automotive, defense, environmental, food processing, general manufacturing, government, medical device, nuclear, petrochemical, plastics, power generation, and refi ning rely on us for in-depth analysis and actionable information. Visit our website at sherrylabs.com to fi nd out more. SHERRYLABS.COM SUPPORTING THE INDIANA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDIANA BUSINESS. INDIANA • DALEVILLE • COLUMBUS • FORT WAYNE • SOUTH BEND • WARSAW OHIO • CAMBRIDGE LOUISIANA • LAFAYETTE • SCOTT • SHREVEPORT OKLAHOMA • TULSA Our fuel means business. When you manage a fl eet of trucks, you need fuel that means business. At CountryMark, we get that. Our premium diesel fuels are engineered and tested to deliver more trouble-free miles and more miles per gallon than any other fuel on the market. And our fuels are refi ned here in the Midwest with 100% American crude oil. It’s your business. Trust it only to CountryMark fuels. Contact your nearest CountryMark dealer for fuel that means business. / countrymark.com / Ag Plus, Inc., South Whitley, 800-448-3965 Lake County FBCA, Crown Point, 219-663-0018 Starke County FBCA, Hamlet, 574-867-2315 AgBest, LLC, Muncie, 800-894-5019 Laughery Valley Ag Co-op, Osgood, 800-821-2629 SynEnergy Partners, Mt. Vernon, 800-276-7157 Ceres Solutions, LLC, Crawfordsville, 800-878-0952 North Central Co-op, Wabash, 800-720-0550 Union County Co-op, Liberty, 765-458-5141 Co-Alliance, LLP, Avon, 800-525-0272 Premier Energy, LLC, Columbus, 877-435-3230 White River Co-op, Loogootee, 812-295-4835 Harvest Land Co-op, Richmond, 800-541-635 Shelby County Co-op, Shelbyville, 800-875-7427 ©2013 Countrymark Cooperative Holding Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Involvement Plan
    Keystone Corridor Ground Water Contamination Site Indianapolis, Indiana Community Involvement Plan April 2016 Intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .........................................................................................................1 Describes the purpose and intended uses of this Community Involvement Plan. Site Overview ......................................................................................................3 Provides the background information including the location and history of the site. Community needs and concerns ......................................................................7 Summarizes what the community members are concerned about, the questions they asked and what they told EPA. Community involvement goals and activities ................................................15 Highlights EPA’s goals, activities and timeline for conducting site-specific activities to keep the public informed and involved during the cleanup process. The Community ................................................................................................19 Provides background information on the city of Indianapolis, profiles the economic and ethnic makeup of the community, and summarizes the community’s history. Appendices Appendix A – Glossary - Initials - Acronyms: Lists the definition of key words, initials and acronyms (words in bold throughout the text are defined in this appendix) Appendix B – List of Contacts: Provides a list of federal, state, and local agencies and neighborhood
    [Show full text]
  • The Judicial Branch
    Unigov Handbook A Book of Factual Information About Indianapolis, Indiana This Handbook Has Been Compiled by the League of Women Voters of Indianapolis Published by the League of Women Voters Education Fund Indianapolis, Indiana © 2011 Preface What is Unigov? How does it work? How can I participate knowledgeably in The League of Women Voters is a non-partisan organization local government? dedicated to the promotion of informed and active participation of citizens in government. It influences public policy through education and advocacy. This Unigov Handbook was designed to inform you about the government Membership is open to all citizens, men and women, over 18. in Indianapolis, Indiana. It was compiled, researched, and edited by League of Women Voters members and is intended to provide the community with The League directs its attention solely to matters of government and accurate, non-partisan information. the individual’s responsibility in that government. The League is active in voter education and provides impartial voting information. We hope the Handbook will contribute to the understanding and involvement of citizens and be a useful resource to students. As such, the LWV will make The telephone number of the Indianapolis League is (317) 767-4187. every effort to update its Web site (www.lwvindy.org) between re-printings of The Web address is www.lwvindy.org. the Handbook when changes within Unigov occur. Citizens are also encouraged to visit the City’s Web site at www.indy.gov to locate current information on who is serving in an elected office or on an appointed board or committee.
    [Show full text]