Status Report on Participation of Non-Member States in the Cern Programmes 2008

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Status Report on Participation of Non-Member States in the Cern Programmes 2008 Confidential CERN/2823 Original: English 1 December 2008 ORGANIZATION EUROPEENNE POUR LA RECHERCHE NUCLEAIRE CERN EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH Action to be taken Voting Procedure COUNCIL - For Information RESTRICTED th 149 session 11 December 2008 STATUS REPORT ON PARTICIPATION OF NON-MEMBER STATES IN THE CERN PROGRAMMES 2008 2008/159/5/e CERN/2823 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page OVERVIEW OF CERN’S INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS ................................3 APPENDIX A – LEGAL INSTRUMENTS FOR RELATIONS WITH CERN...........7 APPENDIX B - CONTRIBUTIONS FROM NON-MEMBER STATES TO CERN ACCELERATORS...........................................................................11 APPENDIX C – PARTICIPATIONS OF NON-MEMBER STATES IN CERN EXPERIMENTS...............................................................................13 APPENDIX D – CONTRIBUTIONS OF NON-MEMBER STATES TO THE WORLDWIDE LHC COMPUTING GRID (WLCG ......................17 APPENDIX E – INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS CURRENTLY IN FORCE..19 APPENDIX F – RELATIONS WITH INDIVIDUAL NON-MEMBER STATES....25 F1 - OBSERVER STATES ............................................................27 F2 - STATES WITH INTERNATIONAL CO-OPERATION AGREEMENTS......................................................................39 F3 - OTHERS WITH ACTIVE SCIENTIFIC RELATIONS WITH CERN ......................................................................................81 F4 - OTHERS WITH SCIENTIFIC CONTACTS WITH CERN..93 APPENDIX G - INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS WITH RELATIONS WITH CERN ....................................................................................97 2008/159/5/e CERN/2823 1 Strategy As laid down in its Convention, CERN’s primary missions are scientific research and international collaboration. The construction of any future front-line accelerator is likely to be an even more global project than has been the LHC, for scientific, technical and financial reasons. We expect that the construction of a global accelerator project will be led by a host region, with other regions enabling it. The growing trend of CERN’s existing collaborations with Non-Member States, including both Observer States and others, combined with the reducing number of other high-energy physics laboratories, provides a natural basis for proposing the CERN site for any future accelerator to the world particle–physics community. Such a proposal would build on the scientific, technical, diplomatic and personal relations established during the construction and operation of the LHC and its experiments. CERN’s experience in leading international collaborations, combined with the support of the Member States and the Host States’ encouragement, makes the Organization uniquely qualified to lead a future global accelerator project. CERN’s international agreements with Non-Member States lay the basis for this vision of CERN’s future. This vision is supported by the increasing interest expressed by many Non-Member States in developing long-term relationships with CERN, extending beyond the LHC programme to include the Organization’s other scientific activities Background The successful realization of the LHC is, above all, a testament to the strong and consistent support that CERN has received from its Member States during its construction. This has made possible the realization of a project whose scientific ambition and technical complexity is unequalled in any region of the world, at least in accelerator physics and related fields. The construction of the LHC followed observations made by the CERN Review Committee in 1987 on the participation of Non-Member States in CERN Programmes, after which the Committee of Council, at its meeting on 23 February 1989, welcomed a closer scientific and technical co-operation with the many countries involved in CERN activities. Over the following years, and especially with the construction of the LHC, the participation of Non- Member States in CERN’s experimental programme has increased steeply. The CERN Council required significant support from Non-Member States before giving its final approval to the LHC project. Subsequently, the full scope of the LHC accelerator and its experiments was made possible by the extent of contributions from Non-Member States. CERN Management reported on contributions to CERN by Non-Member States at the session of Council in June 2002 (CERN/CC/2448), and CERN Council approved a new procedure for the conclusion of International Co-operation Agreements with Non-Member States (CERN/CC/2413). As reported in detail in 2004 in CERN/2587, in 2006 in CERN/2704 and updated here, these amount to a total LHC project value of some 430 MCHF to the LHC accelerator and its injectors, 380 MCHF to the LHC experiments, and 70 MCHF to current non-LHC experiments at CERN. In addition to these purely financial contributions, the 2008/159/5/e 2 CERN/2823 intellectual and technical contributions of Non-Member-State physicists and engineers have been invaluable. In July 2008, the number of registered users from the Member States was 5860, the number from Observer States was 2756 and the number of users from other Non- Member States was 744. Thus, Non-Member-State users represented 37% of the total. Future CERN’s relations with Non-Member States continue to grow, reflecting increased globalization and the uniqueness of CERN’s experimental programme, centred on the LHC. De facto, CERN is a “European Global Laboratory” that carries upon its shoulders most of the scientific community’s hopes for the next advances in the world’s understanding of matter and its role in the evolution of the Universe. Countries around the world show increasing interest in developing long-term relationships with CERN that extend beyond the LHC programme. In addition to the unique capabilities of the LHC at the high-energy frontier and the impending closures of particle accelerators elsewhere, there is also global interest in other unique facilities such as CNGS, ISOLDE, nTOF, the AD and a fixed-target programme. The openness of CERN to qualified and interested scientists from anywhere in the world is also uniquely attractive, and quite in line with the mandate of the CERN Convention for fostering international collaboration. This will evolve in support of the European Strategy for particle physics agreed by Council, and thus the following scientific and technical priorities are (1) to secure global support for the LHC experimental programme, including high-performance computing, on a sustainable basis, (2) to encourage Non-Member-State participation in its R&D programmes for possible upgrades to the LHC, its experiments and CERN’s proton accelerator complex, (3) to welcome partners in CLIC R&D. In this way, CERN is preparing the ground for possible future accelerator construction projects. In line with the latter priorities, several Non-Member States are already participating in the Linac4 project, and participating in R&D for other elements of the LHC upgrade programme and CLIC. In the short term, these projects offer interesting opportunities for extending to accelerator projects the global pattern of collaboration that already exists for the LHC experiments. This document summarizes the current status of CERN’s relations with Non-Member States. An essential role in governing these relations is played by international agreements signed with CERN. These are also described, together with the arrangements for monitoring them, and the status of CERN’s existing International Co-operation Agreements (ICAs) is reviewed. CERN’s motivations for signing new ICAs derive from the overall strategy and the scientific and technical priorities set out above. This document also describes relations with other countries with which CERN has not signed international agreements, and presents guidelines for further ICAs that the Director-General may propose to Council in the future. 2008/159/5/e CERN/2823 3 Overview of CERN’s International Agreements Observer States CERN currently has six Observer States (India, Israel, Japan, Russia, Turkey and the USA). Reflecting their important contributions to the LHC accelerator, three of these (Japan, Russia and the USA) have Special LHC Observer status, according to which they are invited to Restricted Sessions of Council dealing with LHC matters; all Observer States are invited to Open Sessions of Council. The Observer States generally have large communities of registered CERN users, who benefit from the operation of CERN’s accelerators and other facilities. However, Israel is the only Observer State that makes an annual contribution to CERN, currently valued at 25% of its estimated membership fee, and thereby supports CERN’s general infrastructure and operations. An enquiry about becoming an Observer State has been received from representatives of Pakistan, and interest has also been expressed in other Non-Member States such as Canada and China. The criteria for being accepted as an Observer State have not been detailed by Council. Two Observer States have expressed official interest in joining CERN as full Members (Israel and Turkey), and Russia has also expressed official interest in a closer and continuing relationship with CERN. In each case, Membership of the Organization would certainly bring scientific and technical benefits to CERN, but would also raise political issues that only Council can resolve. The existing status of Associate Member of CERN has not yet been found attractive. More flexible forms of association might be of more interest, linked either
Recommended publications
  • India-CMS Newsletter Member Institutes/ Universities of India-CMS
    India-CMS Newsletter Member Institutes/ Universities of India-CMS Vol 1. No. 1, July 2015 1. Nuclear Physics Division (NPD) Bhabha Atomic Research Center (BARC) Mumbai http://www.barc.gov.in/ First volume produced at: 2. Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Department of Physics Pune http://www.iiserpune.ac.in Panjab University Sector 14 Chandigarh - 160014 3. Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar http:// www.iitbbs.ac.in 4. Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Bombay Mumbai http://www.iitb.ac.in/en/education/academic-divisions 5. Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Madras Chennai https://www.iitm.ac.in 6. School of Physical Sciences National Institute of Science Education and Research (NISER), Edited and Compiled by: Bhubaneswar http://physics.niser.ac.in/ Manjit Kaur Department of Physics 7. Department of Physics Panjab University Panjab University Chandigarh Chandigarh http://physics.puchd.ac.in/ [email protected] 8. Division of High Energy Nuclear and Particle Physics Ajit Mohanty Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics (SINP) Director Kolkata http://www.saha.ac.in/web/henppd-home Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics (SINP) Kolkatta 9. Department of High Energy Physics [email protected] Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR), Mumbai http://www.tifr.res.in/ ~dhep/ Abhimanyu Chawla Department of Physics 10. Department of Physics & Astrophysics Panjab University University of Delhi Chandigarh Delhi http://www.du.ac.in/du/index.php?page=physics-astrophysics [email protected] 11. Visva Bharti Santiniketan, West Bengal 731204 http://www.visvabharati.ac.in/Address.html 1 2 Contents Message ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 Message .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tata Institute of Fundamental Research
    Tata Institute of Fundamental Research NAAC Self-Study Report, 2016 VOLUME 2 VOLUME 2 1 Departments, Schools, Research Centres and Campuses School of Technology and School of Mathematics Computer Science (STCS) School of Natural Sciences Chemical Sciences Astronomy and (DCS) Main Campus Astrophysics (DAA) Biological (Colaba) High Energy Physics Sciences (DBS) (DHEP) Nuclear and Atomic Condensed Matter Physics (DNAP) Physics & Materials Theoretical Physics (DTP) Science (DCMPMS) Mumbai Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education (HBCSE) Pune National Centre for Radio Astrophysics (NCRA) Bengaluru National Centre for Biological Sciences (NCBS) International Centre for Theoretical Sciences (ICTS) Centre for Applicable Mathematics (CAM) Hyderabad TIFR Centre for Interdisciplinary Sciences (TCIS) VOLUME 2 2 SECTION B3 Evaluative Report of Departments (Main Campus) VOLUME 2 3 Index VOLUME 1 A-Executive Summary B1-Profile of the TIFR Deemed University B1-1 B1-Annexures B1-A-Notification Annex B1-A B1-B-DAE National Centre Annex B1-B B1-C-Gazette 1957 Annex B1-C B1-D-Infrastructure Annex B1-D B1-E-Field Stations Annex B1-E B1-F-UGC Review Annex B1-F B1-G-Compliance Annex B1-G B2-Criteria-wise inputs B2-I-Curricular B2-I-1 B2-II-Teaching B2-II-1 B2-III-Research B2-III-1 B2-IV-Infrastructure B2-IV-1 B2-V-Student Support B2-V-1 B2-VI-Governance B2-VI-1 B2-VII-Innovations B2-VII-1 B2-Annexures B2-A-Patents Annex B2-A B2-B-Ethics Annex B2-B B2-C-IPR Annex B2-C B2-D-MOUs Annex B2-D B2-E-Council of Management Annex B2-E B2-F-Academic Council and Subject
    [Show full text]
  • Feature Article
    ATUL GURTU India’s Feature Article Feature ConnectionCERN Indian scientists have made concrete contributions to research at this “Mecca of high energy physics” and look toward an even more significant role in the future. Here is an account of how India’s collaboration with CERN has evolved over time. technologies, like particle detectors and (LHC), with over hundred times higher computing and information technology. energy than the ISR. “It’s the Mecca of high energy Experimental particle physics physics.” These words about CERN still ring attempts to answer questions about the in my ears, spoken to me by my senior basic building blocks of nature by firing colleague at Tata Institute of Fundamental particle beams against one another and Research (TIFR), P.K. Malhotra, a few months detecting the debris of the collisions. The before I was to embark on my first stint to particles are traveling at almost the speed CERN. This was late 1970 and I had recently of light and carry very high energy. In a joined the bubble chamber group at TIFR collision some of this energy gets as a postdoctoral researcher, having converted into new particles (good old completed my PhD work at Panjab Einstein’s E = mc2), which fly out in all HE “God-particle” laboratory! With University, Chandigarh. As luck would have directions. One tries to detect and the recent discovery of the new it, my thesis was on properties of measure the energies and directions of Tparticle, which appears to be exactly hypernuclei that are produced by all the particles in order to deduce the what the Higgs particle should be, the stopping K-minus mesons, the exposure to fundamental nature of the particles and laboratory where this experiment was K-minus mesons having come from CERN! the forces between them.
    [Show full text]
  • High Energy Physics Related GRID Activity in India
    High Energy Physics related GRID Activity in India Atul Gurtu Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai, India e-Science and e-Research • Collaborative research that is made possible by sharing across the Internet of resources (data, computation, people’s expertise...) – Crosses organisational boundaries – Often very compute intensive – Often very data intensive – Sometimes large-scale collaboration CERN-LHC project is an excellent example of all the above A. Gurtu: Presentation at ISGC-2008, Taipei, 9-11 April 2008 LHC program • LHC: 7 TeV on 7 TeV protons or 2.76 TeV/u Pb on Pb in the existing 27 km LEP tunnel. First collisions summer 2008 • Four experiments ATLAS, CMS mainly for pp, also for Pb-Pb ALICE geared to Pb-Pb; LHCb specialized b study. • Indian groups in ALICE and CMS • Indian contribution towards LHC machine: Corrector magnets, cryogenic equipment, precision support jacks. A. Gurtu: Presentation at ISGC-2008, Taipei, 9-11 April 2008 India-CMS Collaboration • Panjab U, Delhi U, BARC, TIFR (2 groups), and recently, Visva- Bharati U • Hardware responsibilities: - Outer hadron calorimeter. Physics necessity: ensure more hermetic detector to look for missing energy signals of LSP/ other new physics. - Silicon Pre-shower Detector. Physics necessity: discriminate between γ/π0 to detect the Higgs Æ γγ decay mode (for low mass Higgs favored by existing data) A. Gurtu: Presentation at ISGC-2008, Taipei, 9-11 April 2008 A. Gurtu: Presentation at ISGC-2008, Taipei, 9-11 April 2008 India-ALICE Collaboration PMD (photon multiplicity detector) Bhubaneswar, Institute of Physics Chandigarh, Panjab University Jaipur, University of Rajasthan Jammu, University of Jammu Kolkata, Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre Mumbai, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Mumbai, Indian Institute of Technology Muon Arm Aligarh, Aligarh Muslim University Kolkata, Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics A.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2009-10.Pdf
    MINISTRY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ANNUAL REPORT 2009-2010 foKku vkSj izkS|ksfxdh foHkkx foKku ,oa izkS|ksfxdh ea=kky; ubZ fnYyh Department of Science & Technology Ministry of Science & Technology New Delhi Annual Report 2009-2010 Government of India Department of Science & Technology Ministry of Science & Technology New Delhi CONTENTS Page No. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................. V 1. SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, INFRASTRUCTURE AND HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMETN .................................................................................................................... 1 Science And Engineering Research Council ................................................................................. 1 2. TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME ........................................................ 66 Water Purification ...................................................................................................................... 66 Water Technology Initiative Programme..................................................................................... 73 Solar Energy Research Initiative ................................................................................................ 75 Instrumentation Development Programme (IDP)........................................................................ 76 Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Research Programme...................................................................... 80 Science and Technology Advisory
    [Show full text]
  • Year Book 2013
    INDIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES YEAR BOOK 2013 Postal Address Indian Academy of Sciences C.V. Raman Avenue Post Box No. 8005 Sadashivanagar Post Bangalore 560 080 India Telephone : (080) 2266 1200, 2266 1203 Fax : (080) 2361 6094 Email : [email protected], [email protected] Website : www.ias.ac.in Text formatted by Wintecs Typesetters, Bangalore (Ph. 2332 7311). Printed by Brilliant Printers Pvt Ltd., Bangalore (Ph. 2341 2455). CONTENTS Page Memorandum of Association . 1 Role of the Academy . 3 Statutes . 6 Council for the period 2013–2015 . 18 Office Bearers . 19 Former Presidents . 20 Raman Chair . 21 Jubilee Professor. 24 The Fellowship Fellows . 25 Abbreviations . 195 Honorary Fellows . 196 Fellows and Honorary Fellows elected in 2012 . 203 Subject-wise list of Fellows . 204 Fellows and Honorary Fellows deceased in 2012 . 240 Fellows deceased since 1934 . 241 Honorary Fellows deceased since 1934 . 256 Associates Associates on roll . 258 Associates selected in 2012. 268 Former Associates. 268 Publications . 276 Committees Sectional Committees . 282 Raman Chair Sub-Committee . 283 Jubilee Professor Sub-Committee . 283 Publications Committee . 284 Electronic Publication and Archives . 284 Joint Science Education Panel . 284 Panel on Scientific Values . 285 Panel on Women in Science . 285 Investment Committee. 285 Standing Committee on Staff . 285 Venues of Annual Meetings . 286 Office Staff . 287 Calendar of Meetings in 2013 . 290 List of Holidays in 2013 . 290 1 MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION* I. The name of the Association shall be ‘The Indian Academy of Sciences’. II. The objects of the Academy are: 1. To promote the progress and uphold the cause of science, both in pure and applied branches.
    [Show full text]
  • The Twisted Tale of an Indigenous Mega-Science Project
    The twisted tale of an indigenous mega-science project Subir Sarkar Lecture & Discussion with CBS Science Club, Mumbai, 27th December 2020 Research in ‘pure sciences’ is intellectually exciting and the best training to meet global challenges … both now and in the future Collaboration leads to mutual understanding among nations and provides the foundation for rewarding partnerships on major international projects … India naturally wishes to participate in this global arena https://vigyansamagam.in/assets/documents/Vigyan-Samagam.pdf https://vigyansamagam.in/assets/documents/Vigyan-Samagam.pdf https://vigyansamagam.in/assets/documents/Vigyan-Samagam.pdf https://vigyansamagam.in/assets/documents/Vigyan-Samagam.pdf But why do research in abstract physical sciences? Should Indian scientists not focus on ‘real’ problems such as global warming or the world’s energy needs or innovation in agriculture, transport, health care, urbanisation, etc? Ø Science seeks to understand the underlying regularities and of the natural world - to find simple explanations and make predictions that can be put to experimental test J.C. Bose H.J. Bhabha Ø Search for broad organisational principles C.V. Raman Ø Create and develop new conceptual frameworks S. Chandrasekhar Ø An essential requirement is mathematical consistency … M.N. Saha progress is generated by the fruitfulness of ideas A.K. Raychaudhuri Provides training in both analytic & computational techniques and in …. how to ask the right questions S.N. Bose E.C.G. Sudarshan India has had a distinguished history of contributions to fundamental science … the work needs to be continued by today’s generation (Some) International physics projects with Indian involvement CMS @ Large Hadron 30 Meter Telescope, Mauna Kea FAIR, Darmstadt Collider, CERN, Geneva ITER, Caderache Square Kilometre Array LIGO - India ..
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluative Report of the Departments/Centres in TIFR
    B3-VI Department of High Energy Physics (DHEP) Evaluative Report of Departments (B3) VI-DHEP-1 Department of High Energy Physics 1. Name of the Department : Department of High Energy Physics (DHEP) 2. Year of establishment : 1945 TIFR was divided into Research Groups in the period 1945 – 1997. The present Departments were formed on December 12, 1997. 3. Is the Department part of a School/Faculty of the university? The DHEP is a part of the Faculty of Natural Sciences. 4. Names of programmes offered (UG, PG, M.Phil., Ph.D., Integrated Masters; Integrated Ph.D., D.Sc., D.Litt., etc.) 1. Ph.D. 2. Integrated M.Sc.-Ph.D. 3. M. Phil No students are admitted purely for an M.Phil programme. However, sometimes students in the Ph.D. and Integrated Ph.D. programmes are permitted to leave with an M.Phil. degree provided they have successfully completed the Course Work and an M.Phil. dissertation. 5. Interdisciplinary programmes and departments involved The DHEP does not offer interdisciplinary programmes. However, there is a lot of research collaboration among the Departments, and the graduate school has Instructors drawn from all the five departments in Colaba. 6. Courses in collaboration with other universities, industries, foreign institutions, etc. DHEP has not participated in full courses outside TIFR. However, DHEP members have disseminated information through seminars, colloquiua and discussion meeting held all over the country during the period 2011-15 (see Item 25). 7. Details of programmes discontinued, if any, with reasons No programmes have been discontinued since the inception of the TIFR University.
    [Show full text]