DOCSLIB.ORG

A History of Entomology in Mississippi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A History of Entomology in Mississippi A HISTORY OF ENTOMOLOGY IN MISSISSIPPI 1st Edition A Collection of Historical Accounts Edited and Published by the Historical Committee 1989 MISSISSIPPI ENTOMOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION P.O. Box 5446 Mississippi State, Ms 39762 All Rights Reserved This book, including any part thereof, may not be reproduced by any means without the written consent of the publisher. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ........................................................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgments..........................................................................................................................................iv Entomology Department at Mississippi State University .............................................................................1 Teaching....................................................................................................................................................1 Research ....................................................................................................................................................2 Department Heads ....................................................................................................................................2 Faculty.......................................................................................................................................................2 Highlights..................................................................................................................................................3 Graduates...................................................................................................................................................5 Mississippi Entomological Museum ..............................................................................................................9 Entomology in the Mississippi Cooperative Extension Service .................................................................11 Highlights................................................................................................................................................14 Staff .........................................................................................................................................................15 The State Plant Board of Mississippi/Division of Plant Industry-MDAC..................................................16 Establishment..........................................................................................................................................16 Housing Facilities ...................................................................................................................................16 Activities .................................................................................................................................................17 Bee Inspection.........................................................................................................................................19 Imported Fire Ant ...................................................................................................................................20 White-fringed Beetle ..............................................................................................................................21 Pesticides Program..................................................................................................................................21 Pest Control Program..............................................................................................................................22 Sweet Potato Weevil...............................................................................................................................24 Sweet Potato Certification......................................................................................................................24 Tomato Certification...............................................................................................................................25 Nursery Inspection..................................................................................................................................25 Pink Bollworm........................................................................................................................................26 Argentine Ant..........................................................................................................................................27 Gypsy Moth ............................................................................................................................................28 Japanese Beetle.......................................................................................................................................28 Personnel/Staff........................................................................................................................................29 Entomology at Delta State University..........................................................................................................31 Entomology at Mississippi College..............................................................................................................31 Entomology at the University of Southern Mississippi...............................................................................32 Courses and Faculty................................................................................................................................32 Research ..................................................................................................................................................33 Future Prospects......................................................................................................................................34 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service ..............................................................................................34 Boll Weevil Research Laboratory ................................................................................................................36 Corn Insect Research Laboratory .................................................................................................................39 Cotton Physiology and Genetics Research Laboratory ...............................................................................41 Cotton Insect Research Laboratory ..............................................................................................................41 Imported Fire Ant Research Laboratory ..................................................................................................... 42 Southern Field Crop Insect Management Laboratory and Its Predecessors............................................................................................................ 44 Southern Forest Experiment Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Wood Products Insect Research Project ............................................................................................... 47 Southern Forest Experiment Station, Southern Hardwoods Laboratory, Southern Hardwood Insect-Disease Research..................................................................................... 49 Narcotic Insect Research Unit ..................................................................................................................... 51 Pecan Production Research Unit ..................................................................................................................52 Southern Weed Science Laboratory. .......................................................................................................... 52 USDA Soybean Production Research Unit................................................................................................. 54 Mississippi Agricultural Aviation Association........................................................................................... 56 Mississippi Agricultural Chemicals Council .............................................................................................. 57 Mississippi Agricultural Consultants Association...................................................................................... 58 Mississippi Beekeepers Association ........................................................................................................... 59 Mississippi Entomological Association ...................................................................................................... 62 Early MEA Forerunner...........................................................................................................................62 MEA Establishment................................................................................................................................63 Annual Insect Control Conference.........................................................................................................63 Newsletters..............................................................................................................................................64 Emblem ...................................................................................................................................................64 Legislative Activities..............................................................................................................................64 4-H Entomology
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Calendar No. 113
    Calendar No. 113 117TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 1st Session SENATE 117–34 AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIA- TIONS BILL, 2022 AUGUST 4, 2021—Ordered to be printed Ms. BALDWIN, from the Committee on Appropriations, submitted the following REPORT [To accompany S. 2599] The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 2599) mak- ing appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2022, and for other purposes, reports fa- vorably thereon and recommends that the bill do pass. New obligational authority Total of bill as reported to the Senate .................... $203,085,781,000 Amount of 2021 appropriations ............................... 205,769,113,000 Amount of 2022 budget estimate ............................ 214,812,272,000 Bill as recommended to Senate compared to— 2021 appropriations .......................................... ¥2,683,332,000 2022 budget estimate ........................................ ¥11,726,491,000 45–273 PDF CONTENTS Page Overview and Summary of the Bill ........................................................................ 4 Reports to Congress ................................................................................................. 5 Breakdown by Title ................................................................................................. 5 Title I: Agricultural Programs: Production, Processing, and Marketing: Office of the Secretary
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Bradley Evan Carlson, Ph.D
    Curriculum Vitae Bradley Evan Carlson, Ph.D. Byron K. Trippet Assistant Professor of Biology Wabash College Crawfordsville, IN 47933 Email: [email protected] Telephone: (765) 361-6460 Website: carlsonecolab.weebly.com Professional Experience 2014 - present Byron K. Trippet Assistant Professor of Biology, Wabash College Education 2009-2014 PhD in Ecology, minor in Statistics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA Advisor: Dr. Tracy Langkilde Dissertation: The evolutionary ecology of intraspecific trait variation in larval amphibians 2008 B.S. in Biology, Bethel University, St. Paul, MN Summa cum laude, Honors Graduate Thesis: Temperature and desiccation effects on the antipredator behavior of Centruroides vittatus (Scorpiones: Buthidae) Research Interests Evolutionary ecology – phenotypic diversity, local adaptation, trait integration Behavioral ecology – phenotypic plasticity, predator-prey interactions, personality traits Community ecology – trait-mediated indirect interactions, predation, aquatic ecology Zoology – herpetology, arachnology, comparative morphology Publications (*co-author was undergraduate) Kashon*, EAF, and BE Carlson. 2018. Consistently bolder turtles maintain higher body temperatures in the field but may experience greater predation risk. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 72:9. Carlson, BE, and T Langkilde. 2017. Body size variation in aquatic consumers causes pervasive community effects, independent of mean body size. Ecology and Evolution 7:9978-9990. Lambert, MR, Carlson, BE, Smylie, MS, and L Swierk. 2017. Ontogeny of sexual dichromatism in the explosively breeding Wood Frog. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 12:447-456. Media coverage: InsideEcology.com (https://insideecology.com/2018/02/12/amphibians-that-change-colour/) Carlson, BE, and T Langkilde. 2016. The role of resources in microgeographic variation in Red- spotted Newt (Notophthalmus v. viridescens) morphology. Journal of Herpetology 50:442-448.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Selection Research on Spiders: Progress and Biases
    Biol. Rev. (2005), 80, pp. 363–385. f Cambridge Philosophical Society 363 doi:10.1017/S1464793104006700 Printed in the United Kingdom Sexual selection research on spiders: progress and biases Bernhard A. Huber* Zoological Research Institute and Museum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany (Received 7 June 2004; revised 25 November 2004; accepted 29 November 2004) ABSTRACT The renaissance of interest in sexual selection during the last decades has fuelled an extraordinary increase of scientific papers on the subject in spiders. Research has focused both on the process of sexual selection itself, for example on the signals and various modalities involved, and on the patterns, that is the outcome of mate choice and competition depending on certain parameters. Sexual selection has most clearly been demonstrated in cases involving visual and acoustical signals but most spiders are myopic and mute, relying rather on vibrations, chemical and tactile stimuli. This review argues that research has been biased towards modalities that are relatively easily accessible to the human observer. Circumstantial and comparative evidence indicates that sexual selection working via substrate-borne vibrations and tactile as well as chemical stimuli may be common and widespread in spiders. Pattern-oriented research has focused on several phenomena for which spiders offer excellent model objects, like sexual size dimorphism, nuptial feeding, sexual cannibalism, and sperm competition. The accumulating evidence argues for a highly complex set of explanations for seemingly uniform patterns like size dimorphism and sexual cannibalism. Sexual selection appears involved as well as natural selection and mechanisms that are adaptive in other contexts only. Sperm competition has resulted in a plethora of morpho- logical and behavioural adaptations, and simplistic models like those linking reproductive morphology with behaviour and sperm priority patterns in a straightforward way are being replaced by complex models involving an array of parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Kirill Glebovich Mikhailov: on the Occasion of His 60Th Birthday
    Zootaxa 5006 (1): 006–012 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Biography ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5006.1.4 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B883A8B0-F324-400F-B670-304511C53963 Kirill Glebovich Mikhailov: On the occasion of his 60th Birthday YURI M. MARUSIK1 & VICTOR FET2 1Institute for Biological Problems of the North, Portovaya Street 18, Magadan 685000, Russia Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4499-5148 2Department of Biological Sciences, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia 25755-2510, USA [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1016-600X Kirill Glebovich Mikhailov was born on 29 July 1961 in Moscow, Russia. Both of his parents, Gleb K. Mikhailov (1929–2021) and Galina R. Mikhailova (1926–2019), were research scientists. Kirill’s father was an expert in the history of mechanics, and mother, a biologist. Since early childhood Kirill was raised mainly by his maternal grandparents, Ro- man P. Nosov and Antonina V. Nosova. Kirill’s grandfather, a CPSU official and a career administrator at the Ministry of Energetics, retired from his post in 1965 to take care of the grandson. Kirill’s grandmother, an obstetrician by profession, received disability at a military plant during the WWII in evacuation, and was a housewife after the war. In 1978, Kirill began his studies at the Division of Biology (Biologicheskii Fakul’tet) of the Moscow State University (below, MSU). Even earlier, as a schoolboy, Kirill used to buy books on zoology, especially separate issues of the Fauna of the USSR and Keys to the Fauna of the USSR, then relatively cheap and available.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Spiders Cast Webs Over River Using Super Biomaterial 17 September 2010
    Giant spiders cast webs over river using super biomaterial 17 September 2010 access journal for the communication of all peer- reviewed scientific and medical research published by the Public Library of Science. Caerostris darwini, a giant orb spider and namesake of Charles Darwin, weaves a web of tremendous strength and size never before seen. Photo courtesy of Matjaz Gregoric. (PhysOrg.com) -- The antithesis of the itsy-bitsy spider, Caerostris darwini, a giant orb spider and namesake of Charles Darwin, weaves a web of super strength never before seen, says Dr. Todd Blackledge, Leuchtag Endowed Chair at The University of Akron. This close-up view of a giant orb spider web spanning a Blackledge, an associate professor of biology; Ingi river demonstrates the tremendous strength and elasticity of this type of silk. Photo courtesy of Matjaz Kuntner. Agnarsson, Blackledge’s former postdoctoral researcher at UA and current assistant professor and director of Museum of Zoology at the University of Puerto Rico; and Matjaž Kuntner, In their PLoS ONE paper, Agnarsson, Kuntner and chair of the Institute of Biology at the Scientific Blackledge report on the testing of material Research Centre, Slovenian Academy of Sciences properties of Darwin’s bark spider. The authors and Arts, reveal this new spider species from predicted that the expansive webs would be spun Madagascar and its incredibly expansive web. using extraordinary silk and they proved their prediction correct. First, the researchers considered “Darwin’s bark spider or C. darwini,” as it is that spider silks already combine high strength with referenced, makes one of the largest known webs elasticity, demonstrate exceptional toughness and and suspends the giant webs across rivers and are able to absorb three times more energy than lakes, according to the researchers.
    [Show full text]
  • Container List
    Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library: Agricultural Research Service Biological Control Documentation Center Collection Series I. Asian Parasite Laboratory. Subseries I.A. Correspondence. Container List Series I. Asian Parasite Laboratory (APL). 1927-1993. 20 boxes. Series I.A. Correspondence. 1963-1993. 16.5 boxes. Box 1 Folder 1 Abrahamson, Lawrence P. 1983-1984 Box 1 Folder 2 Abstract n.d. Box 1 Folder 3 Academic Press, Inc. 1986-1993 Box 1 Folder 4 Achterberg, Dr. Kees van 1982 Box 1 Folder 5 Aeschlimann, Dr. Jean-Paul 1981-1985 Box 1 Folder 6 Agricultural Counselor 1976-1981 Box 1 Folder 7 Air Force, Army 1980-1981 Box 1 Folder 8 Aizawa, Professor Keio 1986 Box 1 Folder 9 Akasaka, Naoyuki 1982 Box 1 Folder 10 Allen, Professor Douglas C. 1981 Box 1 Folder 11 Allen Press, Inc. 1992-1993 Box 1 Folder 12 American Embassy, Beijing, China 1990-1991 Box 1 Folder 13 American Embassy, Tokyo, Japan 1981-1990 Box 1 Folder 14 American Journal of Botany 1992 Box 1 Folder 15 Amman, Dr. Gene D. 1982 Box 1 Folder 16 Amrine, Jr., Dr. James W. 1986 Box 1 Folder 17 Anderson, Don M. 1981-1983 Box 1 Folder 18 Anderson, John F. 1975-1976 Box 1 Folder 19 Andres, Dr. Lloyd 1989-1990 Box 1 Folder 20 Angalet, Dr. George W. 1973-1978 Box 1 Folder 21 Annual Reviews Inc. 1992 Box 1 Folder 22 Ao, Professor Hsien-Bine 1988 Box 1 Folder 23 Aoki, Professor Joji 1977-1978 Box 1 Folder 24 Apps, Dr. Darrel A. 1984 Box 1 Folder 25 Agricultural Research 1980-1981 Box 1 Folder 26 Army, Thomas J.
    [Show full text]
  • Kirill Glebovich Mikhailov: on the Occasion of His 60Th Birthday
    Zootaxa 5006 (1): 006–012 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Biography ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5006.1.4 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B883A8B0-F324-400F-B670-304511C53963 Kirill Glebovich Mikhailov: On the occasion of his 60th Birthday YURI M. MARUSIK1 & VICTOR FET2 1Institute for Biological Problems of the North, Portovaya Street 18, Magadan 685000, Russia Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4499-5148 2Department of Biological Sciences, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia 25755-2510, USA �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1016-600X Kirill Glebovich Mikhailov was born on 29 July 1961 in Moscow, Russia. Both of his parents, Gleb K. Mikhailov (1929–2021) and Galina R. Mikhailova (1926–2019), were research scientists. Kirill’s father was an expert in the history of mechanics, and mother, a biologist. Since early childhood Kirill was raised mainly by his maternal grandparents, Ro- man P. Nosov and Antonina V. Nosova. Kirill’s grandfather, a CPSU official and a career administrator at the Ministry of Energetics, retired from his post in 1965 to take care of the grandson. Kirill’s grandmother, an obstetrician by profession, received disability at a military plant during the WWII in evacuation, and was a housewife after the war. In 1978, Kirill began his studies at the Division of Biology (Biologicheskii Fakul’tet) of the Moscow State University (below, MSU). Even earlier, as a schoolboy, Kirill used to buy books on zoology, especially separate issues of the Fauna of the USSR and Keys to the Fauna of the USSR, then relatively cheap and available.
    [Show full text]
  • ZOOLOGY Exploring the Biodiversity of Colorado and Theworld
    CHAPTER 4 — ZOOLOGY Exploring the Biodiversity of Colorado and the World CHAPTER 4 ZOOLOGY Exploring the Biodiversity of Colorado and the World Jeffrey T. Stephenson, Before the Museum Paula E. Cushing, The first collections of specimens that make up what is now the Denver John R. Demboski, and Museum of Nature & Science were actually established well before the Frank-T. Krell founding of the institution in 1900, the selection of a board of trustees, or the construction of a building to house and exhibit the specimens. Edwin Carter (1830–1900) (Fig. 4.1) collected Colorado birds and mammals from the 1860s through the 1890s. Born in New York in 1830, Carter arrived in Colorado in 1859 hoping to make it rich in the goldfields, but he soon became interested in the region’s natural history. He learned hide tanning and, as his prospects for hitting the mother lode faded, he earned his living selling buckskin clothing that he handcrafted. Carter supplemented these earnings by mar- keting foodstuffs and other provisions to the growing population of successful and (mostly) unsuccessful prospectors flooding the region. His interest in nature turned to concern as he observed dwindling numbers of mammals and birds, owing largely to habitat destruction and overhunting. Period photographs of the area’s mining district show a landscape largely denuded of vegetation. By the 1870s, Carter noted that many animal species were becoming scarce. The state’s forests were being devastated, ranches and farms were replacing open prairie, and some species, including the last native bison in Colorado, were on the verge of extirpation or extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • Red River Valley (Arkansas and Louisiana) Boll Weevil Cooperative Eradication Program
    United States Department of Agriculture Red River Valley (Arkansas Animal and Plant Health and Louisiana) Boll Weevil Inspection Service Cooperative Eradication Farm Service Agency Program Environmental Assessment, May 1997 Red River Valley (Arkansas and Louisiana) Boll Weevil Cooperative Eradication Program Environmental Assessment, May 1997 Agency Contact: Joe Davidson, Regional Program Manager Central Regional Office Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 3505 Boca Chica Blvd., Suite 360 Brownsville, TX 78521-4065 (210) 504-4150 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in its programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, marital or familial status, or political beliefs. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact the USDA Office of Communications at 202-720-5881 (voice) or 202-720-7808 (TDD). To file a complaint, write the Secretary of Agriculture, USDA, Washington, DC 20250, or call 202-720-7327 (voice) or 202-720-1127 (TDD). USDA is an equal employment opportunity employer. Mention of companies or commercial products in this report does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture over others not mentioned. USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of any product mentioned. Product names are mentioned solely to report factually on available data and to provide specific information. This publication reports research involving pesticides. All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate State and/or Federal agencies before they can be recommended.
    [Show full text]
  • P2294 the Boll Weevil in Mississippi
    The Boll Weevil In Mississippi: Gone, But Not Forgotten Although the boll weevil has been successfully It is likely that the boll weevil attained this rate of eradicated from Mississippi cotton fields, it must never spread under its own power. Both male and female boll be forgotten! Both cotton growers and scouts must weevils are capable of long duration flight, and remain aware of how to identify boll weevils and the individual weevils can move surprising distances when damage they cause, as well as how to scout for this pest. carried by prevailing winds. In some studies, marked Continued vigilance is necessary because the boll boll weevils have been recaptured as far as 63 to 169 weevil likely will return to the state from time to time, miles from the point where they were released. and unless these reinfestations are detected and This information shows why it is so important to be eliminated promptly, large areas of the state could be vigilant for the reappearance of the boll weevil in the quickly reinfested. state. It made it to Mississippi once, and there is every reason to expect it can do so again if preventive steps HOW DID THE BOLL WEEVIL GET TO are not taken. MISSISSIPPI? Modern transportation greatly increases the potential for boll weevil reinfestations to occur. As a “stowaway” Boll weevils are not native to Mississippi. Because aboard a motorized vehicle, it only takes a matter of cotton is the only host plant upon which the weevil can hours for a boll weevil to travel from a cotton field or develop and reproduce, it was not until cotton from wild hosts in Mexico to a cotton field in production was established in the state that the weevil Mississippi.
    [Show full text]
  • Arachnologische Arachnology
    Arachnologische Gesellschaft E u Arachnology 2015 o 24.-28.8.2015 Brno, p Czech Republic e www.european-arachnology.org a n Arachnologische Mitteilungen Arachnology Letters Heft / Volume 51 Karlsruhe, April 2016 ISSN 1018-4171 (Druck), 2199-7233 (Online) www.AraGes.de/aramit Arachnologische Mitteilungen veröffentlichen Arbeiten zur Faunistik, Ökologie und Taxonomie von Spinnentieren (außer Acari). Publi- ziert werden Artikel in Deutsch oder Englisch nach Begutachtung, online und gedruckt. Mitgliedschaft in der Arachnologischen Gesellschaft beinhaltet den Bezug der Hefte. Autoren zahlen keine Druckgebühren. Inhalte werden unter der freien internationalen Lizenz Creative Commons 4.0 veröffentlicht. Arachnology Logo: P. Jäger, K. Rehbinder Letters Publiziert von / Published by is a peer-reviewed, open-access, online and print, rapidly produced journal focusing on faunistics, ecology Arachnologische and taxonomy of Arachnida (excl. Acari). German and English manuscripts are equally welcome. Members Gesellschaft e.V. of Arachnologische Gesellschaft receive the printed issues. There are no page charges. URL: http://www.AraGes.de Arachnology Letters is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Autorenhinweise / Author guidelines www.AraGes.de/aramit/ Schriftleitung / Editors Theo Blick, Senckenberg Research Institute, Senckenberganlage 25, D-60325 Frankfurt/M. and Callistus, Gemeinschaft für Zoologische & Ökologische Untersuchungen, D-95503 Hummeltal; E-Mail: [email protected], [email protected] Sascha
    [Show full text]
  • NOT E Interference of Boll Weevil Trapping by Spiders
    NOT E Interference of Boll Weevil Trapping by Spiders (Araneida) and an Evaluation of Trap Modification to Reduce Unwanted Arthropods1 J. Scott Armstrong2 and David B. Richman3 USDA-ARS, Beneficial Insect Research Unit, 2413 East Highway 83, Weslaco, Texas 78596 USA J. Entomol. Sci. 42(3): 392-398 (July 2007) Key Words trap design, Anthonomus grandis grandis, cotton Boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis grandis Boheman, eradication is nearing comple­ tion throughout the U.S. as all cotton-producing regions are in active or posteradica­ tion maintenance, with most of the active eradication occurring in Texas. The success of eradication is almost entirely based on boll weevil traps baited with grandlure and a weekly trap capture threshold of 1 weevil per trap per week used in active eradi­ cation zones (Dickerson et al. 2001, Cotton Foundation, Memphis, TN, 627 p.). The Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation uses a standard 10 mg grandlure dis­ penser (Scentry Biologicals, Billings, MT) and an impregnated kill-strip of 10% (wtwt) dichlorovos DDVP ([2,2,-dichlorovinyl dimethyl phosphate]; Heron Environmental, Emigsville, PA) to kill boll weevils in the trap and prevent their escape (Suh et al. 2003, J. Econ. Entomol. 96: 348-351). Even when a DDVP kill-strip is used in a boll weevil trap in South Texas, a significant impedance to trapping efficiency can be the predation of boll weevils by insects and spiders that enter the capture area of the trap. Spiders have been implicated as a significant factor in interfering with trapping effi­ ciency by preying on boll weevils or, more importantly, by webbing the entrance of the trap making it impossible for weevils to enter the capture container (Armstrong and Richman 2006, Proc.
    [Show full text]