Townscape and Visual Appraisal
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
St Hilda’s College Phase 2 Development Townscape and Visual Appraisal Part 1 April 2021 St Hilda’s College Developments St Hilda's College, Oxford Townscape and Visual Appraisal Final report Prepared by LUC March 2021 St Hilda’s College Developments St Hilda's College, Oxford Townscape and Visual Appraisal Version Status Prepared Checked Approved Date 1. Baseline report D Hope R Knight R Knight 05.05.2020 2. Amended Baseline D Hope R Knight R Knight 25.06.2020 3. Draft TVA D Hope R Knight R Knight 29.03.2021 4. Final TVA D Hope R Knight R Knight 21.04.2021 Bristol Land Use Consultants Ltd Landscape Design Edinburgh Registered in England Strategic Planning & Assessment Glasgow Registered number 2549296 Development Planning London Registered office: Urban Design & Masterplanning Manchester 250 Waterloo Road Environmental Impact Assessment London SE1 8RD Landscape Planning & Assessment landuse.co.uk Landscape Management 100% recycled paper Ecology Historic Environment GIS & Visualisation Contents St Hilda's College, Oxford March 2021 Contents Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Baseline Environment and Potential Receptors 3 Planning Policy and Guidance 3 Townscape Character and Sensitivity 5 Visual Context and Potential Visual Receptors 8 Chapter 3 Designed in Mitigation 19 Mitigation during Construction 19 Mitigation during Operation 19 Chapter 4 Assessment of Effects 21 Assessment Approach 21 Townscape Effects 22 Visual Effects 24 Summary and conclusion 36 Appendix A Visualisations A-1 A1 – Method A-1 A2 - Visualisations A-1 LUC I i Chapter- 1 Introduction St Hilda's College, Oxford March 2021 Chapter 1 Introduction This report has been prepared by LUC on behalf of St Hilda’s College Developments, to consider the townscape and visual effects of the proposed Phase 2 student accommodation development (the ‘proposed development’) at St Hilda’s College, Oxford (the Site). The assessment has been carried out by Chartered Landscape Architects at LUC. Townscape and visual appraisals are separate although linked processes. The report considers the potential effects of the proposed development on: ◼ The townscape as a resource in its own right (caused by changes to the constituent elements of the townscape, its specific aesthetic or perceptual qualities); and ◼ Views and visual amenity as experienced by people (caused by changes in the appearance of the townscape). This report should be read alongside the Heritage Statement submitted with the application. The appraisal of the townscape and visual effects and has been undertaken in accordance with the principles set out in Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, Third Edition (GLVIA3)1, noting that it does not report on the significance of effects as would be required as part of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). Field surveys were carried out in December 2019, and March, August and October 2020, during which records were made in the form of field notes and photographs. This included _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 Landscape Institute and Institute for Environmental Management and Assessment (2013) Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, Third Edition. LUC I 1 Chapter 1 Introduction St Hilda's College, Oxford March 2021 visits to the application Site and travel around the study area to consider the potential effects on townscape character and views. Accurate Visual Representations (AVRs)/photomontages are provided at Appendix A.2 to aid the assessment of visual effects of the proposed development. The method for their production is also set out in Appendix A.1 and includes the use of site photography, a Digital Terrain Model (DTM) and a 3D model of the proposed development provided by Design Engine. LUC I 2 Chapter- 2 Baseline Environment and Potential Receptors St Hilda's College, Oxford March 2021 Chapter 2 Baseline Environment and Potential Receptors This section sets out the relevant planning policy and guidance; the character of the townscape; the views and visual context; and sets out the sensitivity to change of identified townscape and visual receptors. Planning Policy and Guidance The full planning policy assessment is set out in the Planning Statement. Reference is made below to planning policy directly relevant to townscape and visual matters. National The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)2 draws attention to the Government’s planning policies for achieving and delivering sustainable development. Core planning principles of particular relevance to the proposed development include: ◼ Section 12 ‘Achieving well-designed places’ sets out the importance of high-quality buildings and places for sustainable development, and to create better places. Paragraph 127 states that developments should add to the overall quality of the area over the duration of the development; be visually attractive; and be sympathetic to local character and history, including surrounding built environment and landscape setting; ◼ Section 15 ‘Conserving and enhancing the natural environment’ states that planning policies and decisions should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment; and ◼ Section 16 ‘Conserving and enhancing the historic environment’ states that new development should _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2 Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (February 2019). The National Planning Policy Framework LUC I 3 Chapter 2 Baseline Environment and Potential Receptors St Hilda's College, Oxford March 2021 make a positive contribution to local character and Area’ “should be limited in bulk and must be of the distinctiveness. highest design quality” and will be required to provide a visual impact assessment, including: the use of photos Local and verified views; an explanation of impact in terms of the four visual tests (as set out within the Oxford High The Oxford Local Plan 2036 Buildings Technical Advice Note - see below). It should be noted here that the proposed development is less The Oxford Local Plan 20363, including main than 18.2m at its highest point. In regard to the View modifications, was adopted on the 8th of June 2020 and Cones, it is stated that any proposals that may impact on replaces and supersedes the Oxford Local Plan 2001-2016, roofscape or the foreground part of views should be the Core Strategy 2026 and the Policies Map 2013. It now carefully designed, and that planning permission will not forms part of the statutory development plan, along with the be granted for development that would “harm the special Policies Map 20204, which means that it will have full weight in significance of the view”. determining planning applications. The policies of relevance to this report include: Appendix 6.1 of the Oxford Local Plan 2036 sets out a design checklist that should be used to inform design ◼ Policy G7: Protection of existing Green proposals. This includes: Infrastructure features’ states that planning permission will be refused “for development that results in the loss ◼ Responding to site character and context - What are the of green infrastructure features such as hedgerows, features, opportunities and constraints of the site and its trees or woodland where this would have a significant setting? What elements in the surrounding area have adverse impact upon public amenity…”, and that where been identified as making a positive or negative retention isn’t possible loss must be mitigated. contribution to local character? ◼ Policy G8: ‘New and enhanced Green and Blue ◼ Natural Features and Resources - How could the Infrastructure Network Features’ states that existing landscape character or features be incorporated “development proposals affecting existing Green early into the landscaping of the proposal? Infrastructural features should demonstrate how these ◼ Designing development blocks, density and uses - How have been incorporated within the design of the new has the arrangement of blocks been informed by the development where appropriate”, and that this applies to features identified during the constraints and protected and unprotected Green Infrastructure features, opportunities plan? How does the density relate to the such as hedgerows and trees. surrounding context and make the best use of the site? ◼ Policy DH1: ‘High quality design and placemaking’ How do the buildings and edges of the site relate to the sets out that development should be of high-quality surrounding area in a positive way? design that creates or enhances local distinctiveness. ◼ Plots and buildings; and Ensuring quality - How do new Planning permission will only be granted where buildings respect the surrounding character or have a proposals are designed to meet the key design distinctive but complementary character informed by the objectives and principles for delivering high quality unique characteristics of the site? How does the scale of development as set out in Appendix 6.1 (see below). the new development relate to its surroundings? ◼ Policy DH2: ‘Views and building heights’ states that “the City Council will seek to retain significant views both Oxford High Buildings Technical Advice Note within Oxford and from outside, in particular to and from The Oxford High Buildings Technical Advice Note the historic skyline” and that planning permission will be (TAN)5 seeks to inform decisions regarding the growth and refused for any development that “would harm the intensification of Oxford.