02 Athleague Co Roscommon Annual Environmental Report 2015

Reg No P0168 – 02

Annual Environmental Report 2015

Kepak Athleague AER 2015 Table of Contents Page Number

1.0 Company Details 4 2.0 The Environmental Policy of Kepak Athleague 5 3.0 Environmental Management 6 3.1 Environmental Management Structure 7 3.2 Environmental Progress Meetings 7 4.0 Emissions from the Installation 8 4.1 Emissions to Waters 8 4.1.1 WWTP Discharge Performance 9 4.1.2 Surface Water Parameters 10 4.1.3 Groundwa ter 11 4.2 Emissions to Atmosphere 12 4.2.1 Stack Monitoring 12 4.2.2 Fugitive Emissions 12 5.0 Waste Management and Recycling 13 5.1 Off -Site Waste 13 5.2 Nutrient Management Plan 14 5.2.1 Storage of Organic Waste 14 6.0 Resource Management 15 7.0 Environmental Incidents and Non -Compliances 16 7.1 Summary of Incidents 16 8.0 Complaints Summary 16 9.0 Objectives and Targets 17 10.0 Environmental Man agement Programme Report on 201 5 28 11.0 Enviro nmental Management Programme 201 6 29

Tables Page Number Table 1 – Discharge 8 Table 2 – Monitoring Point AS -2 10 Table 3 – Monitoring Point AS -3 10 Table 4 – Monitoring Point AS -4 10 Table 5 – MW -1 11 Table 6 – MW -2 11 Table 7 – MW -3 11 Table 8 – Stack Monitoring Results 12 Table 9 – Waste Produced from 201 1-2015 13 Table 10 – Contractors and Destination of Waste 13 Table 11 – Resource Consumption 15 Table 12 – Summary of Incidents 16 Table 13 – Breakdown of Non -Co mpliances 16 Table 14 – Summary of Complaints 16 Table 15 – Breakdown of Complaints 16 2

Kepak Athleague AER 2015 Table 16 – Objectives and Targets 201 6-20 20 17 Table 17 – Summary of 201 5 EMP 18 Table 18 – EMP 201 6 19

Appendix 1 - PRTR Details Appendix 2 - Air monitoring Reports

Kepak Athleague AER 2015 1.0 Company Details

Company Name: Kepak (Athleague) Ltd.

Reg No: P0168-02

Address: Athleague Co Roscommon

Plant Manager: Michael Geoghegan

Environmental Manager: Sharon Corcoran

Sector: Sector 7.4.2 Slaughter of Animals

Kepak Athleague AER 2015 2.0 The Environmental Policy of Kepak Athleague

Kepak Athleague operates a sheep and cattle slaughter facility and a boning hall. Kepak Athleague recognises that we have a responsibility to demonstrate sound environmental awareness and believe that responsible environmental management is good business practice. The company is regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency under licence registration number P0168-02.

We wish to operate all activities through monitoring, communication and training all employees on environmental issues. Kepak Athleague is committed to continually improving environmental performance. Kepak Athleague accepts the responsibility to minimise the risk of environmental pollution. Responsible environmental management enhances the quality of our meat products and is in keeping with regulatory and customer requirements.

Kepak Athleague aim to implement the principles of the Environmental Policy by the following:

• The environmental standard of the site will be maintained at the highest level through implementation of the Environmental Management System (EMS). The EMS will detail the environmental procedures with which the company adheres to, to successfully maintain an environmental conscious business • An environmental manager is appointed and actively promotes environmental awareness among employees at all levels and contractors through appropriate communication and training programmes • The environmental awareness programme ensures all employees and contractors are aware of the potential impact inappropriate actions may have on the environment and are aware of the preventative and/or corrective actions required to minimise the impact. • We will make available to the public and customers information on our environmental performance on request. • We will comply with and co-operate with all environmental regulations as laid down by all regulatory bodies and customers. • We will aim to meet all objectives and targets as set out in the EMS and the annual Environmental Management Programme • Site response procedures are in place to prevent accidental emissions of materials or energy on the site. In addition procedures will be put in place on the event of detection of non compliance with this policy • This policy, together with the Environmental Management System will be reviewed on an annual basis and improved where required • All new activities, products and processes shall be assessed to identify possible environmental impacts • Management are dedicated to the monitoring and management of waste generation, water consumption and energy consumption, minimising usage where possible

Kepak Athleague AER 2015 3.0 Environmental Management

The General Manager, has the overall responsibility for the factory and the environmental management team as a whole. The General Manager approves capital expenditure for the environmental systems on- site

Environmental matters will be dealt with by the both the Technical Manager and Environmental Manager, with the Environmental Manager responsible for the Environmental Management System as a whole.

Environmental Manager Responsibilities include the following (this list is not exhaustive):

Ensuring the Environmental Management System is maintained

Ensuring Kepak Athleague meets the specific requirements of the IPPC licence, other relevant legal requirements and customer requirements

Managing the efficient operation of the WWTP and ensuring effluent analysis is carried out as per requirement

Liaising with regulatory bodies including EPA, Inland Fisheries Ireland, County Councils

Ensuring full compliance to the conditions of the licence

Maintaining good environmental practices on site

Carrying out environmental training for on-site personnel

In the absence of the Environmental Manager, the Assistant Site Manager will take responsibility for environmental management. In the event that both the Environmental Manager and the Assistant Site Manager are both off-site the Technical Manager will take responsibility for environmental management.

It is the responsibility of the WWTP operator to operate the WWTP efficiently and within the licence limit values. The results of the effluent analysis are reviewed on a daily basis to assess the WWTP performance and to operate the WWTP as required.

It is the responsibility of the Assistant Site Manager, to ensure that the production process does not has an adverse effect on the environment and to inform the production managers of environmental issues affected by the process.

The production managers and supervisors aim to reduce water usage, energy usage, resource usage and waste during the production process.

Maintenance Manager Responsibilities include the following (this list is not exhaustive):

Energy efficiency

To maintain critical equipment affecting the WWTP

To assist the environmental manager with any maintenance issue that may have an effect on the environment

To inform the environmental manager of any equipment malfunction, on the production line or WWTP, that has an effect on the environment

To minimise the use of resources including water and LFO It is the responsibility of the hygiene room operative and night wash staff to keep water usage as minimal as possible and not to over use chemicals so as to have a negative effect on the WWTP.

Kepak Athleague AER 2015 3.1 Environmental Management Structure

General Manager

Assistant Site Manager

Environmental Maintenance Slaughter Hall Manager/ Boning Manager Manager Hall Manager

WWTP Operator

3.2 Environmental Progress Meetings

On a regular basis management on site have an environmental meeting. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the environmental performance of the site, the quality if water emissions, air emissions, energy management, resource usage, issues relating to the application of waste to land, IPPC licence issues and customer requirements.

Actions and responsibilities are drawn up and target dates set for achieving the actions. A review of the actions is then carried forward to the next meeting. This ensures improvements are regularly monitored to ensure continuous improvements.

Meetings also take place regularly with Kepak’s consultant company, Rowan Engineering Consultants.

Kepak Athleague AER 2015 4.0 Emissions from the Installation

4.1 Emissions to waters

Kepak discharges treated effluent into the River Suck, a tributary of the River Shannon. The River Suck drains large areas of Roscommon and Galway, flowing over limestone terrain and is joined by ten tributaries along its route. It rises in Lough O’Flynn, north of Castlerea, at Shannonbridge. The River Suck is part of the on going Lough Derg/Lough Ree catchments monitoring and management programme.

4.1.1 WWTP Discharge Performance

Under the IPC Licence, the following discharge limit values have been applied to treated water emissions from Kepak Athleague. All results are based on the results from the external laboratory.

Table 1 – 2015 Discharge

Licensed Discharge Limits 2015 Discharge Parameter mg/L Kg/day Kg/year Kg/day Kg/year CO D 125 112.5 41,062 21.55 7866 BOD 25 22.5 8,212 1.08 397.31 Suspended Solids 35 31.5 11,497 3.48 1272.1 Total Nitrogen as N 15 13.5 4,927 5.29 1933.2 Total Ammonia as N 10 9.0 3,285 0.064 23.66 Total Phosphorus as P 2.0 1.8 657 0.20 73.72

Effluent was analysed on a daily basis throughout 2015 internally. Samples were sent to an external laboratory on a weekly basis for BOD and on a quarterly basis for F,O & G’s. ALT were contracted and are accredited to ISO 17025.

During 2015 Kepak Athleague discharged 205,330 cubic meters of final treated effluent to the River Suck.

Kepak Athleague AER 2015

4.1.1.1 BOD Loading Discharged

The BOD loading for 2015 was 397.3kgs compared to 495.9kgs in 2014. There were no breaches to the licence, the results have been consistently good and have not breached the 85% limit.

4.1.1.2 COD Loading Discharged

The COD loading for 2015 was 7866kgs compared to 5043.7kgs in 2014. There were no breaches to the licence, the results have been consistently good and have not breached the 85% limit.

4.1.1.3 Total Phosphorus Loading Discharged

The Phosphate loading for 2015 was 73.7 compared to 89.7kgs in 2014. There were no breaches to the licence, the results have been consistently good and have not breached the 85% limit.

4.1.1.4 Total Nitrogen Loading Discharged

The Total Nitrogen loading for 2015 was 1933kgs compared to 1351.9kgs in 2014. Results on occasion have breached the 85% limit but there were no breaches to the licence.

4.1.1.5 Ammonia Loading Discharged

The Ammonia loading for 2015 was 23.66kgs compared to 118.6kgs in 2014. There were no breaches to the licence, the results have been consistently good and have not breached the 85% limit.

4.1.1.6 Suspended Solid Loading Discharged

The Suspended Solids loading for 2015 was 1272.1 compared to 1416.3kgs in 2014. There were no breaches to the licence, the results have been consistently good and have not breached the 85% limit.

Kepak Athleague AER 2015

4.1.2 Surface Water Parameters

Surface water visual assessment is carried out on a daily basis. AS-2 was sampled on a monthly basis with the exception of December where the sample point was inaccessible due to flooding. AS- 3 and AS-4 were sampled on a quarterly basis as per licence requirement.

Table 2 - Monitoring Point AS-2

COD mg/l Total Nitrogen mg/l Ammonia mg/l Conductivity µs/cm Jan 18 4.4 1.429 157 Feb 29 1.8 0.444 370 Mar 20 2.5 0.354 405 Apr 16 4.1 0.749 368 May 10 3.2 0.236 185 Jun 24 4.5 0.551 980 Jul 20 5.1 0.358 657 Aug 22 3.1 0.222 440 Sep 24 5.4 0.707 137 Oct 20 4.6 0.745 658 Nov 26 5.9 0.841 840

Table 3 - Monitoring Point AS-3

COD mg/l Total Nitrogen mg/l Ammonia mg/l Conductivity µs/cm Q1 18 4.3 0.234 634 Q2 8 2.4 0.107 380 Q3 4 2.6 0.485 692 Q4 18 3.2 0.324 762

Table 4 - Monitoring Point AS-4

COD mg/l Total Nitrogen mg/l Ammonia mg/l Conductivity µs/cm Q1 15 5.5 0.060 319 Q2 8 1.9 0.016 610 Q3 5 4.1 0.061 745 Q4 10 4.8 0.318 972

Kepak Athleague AER 2015

4.1.3 Groundwater

Ground water samples were taken from MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3 on a quarterly basis throughout the year.

Table 5 - MW-1

Parameter Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 COD mg/l 12 28 17 27 Nitrate mg/l 2.7 1.9 0.5 4.7 Amm onia mg/l 0.048 0.014 0.074 0.071

Table 6 - MW-2

Parameter Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 COD mg/l 10 9 10 14 Nitrate mg/l 2.5 0.3 1.7 0.6 Ammonia mg/l 0.132 0.104 0.006 0.068

Table 7 - MW-3

Parameter Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 COD mg/l 18 15 9 20 Nitrate mg/l 2 1.7 1.8 3.2 Ammonia mg/l 0.160 0.012 0.240 0.552

Kepak Athleague AER 2015 4.2 Emissions to Atmosphere

4.2.1 Stack Monitoring Analysis of stack emissions was carried out bi-annually by Odour Monitoring Ireland. Kepak Athleague operates one boiler, namely Cochran/Thermax 6800. Light fuel oil is used to operate the boiler. The results are provided in Table 8.

Table 8 – Stack Monitoring Results

Parameter Round 1 Round 2 Particulates (mg/m 3) 73.2 5.91

3 NO x (mg/m ) 648.74 583.47 3 SO x (mg/m ) 816.3 984.05 CO (mg/m 3) 9.55 17.09

4.2.2 Fugitive Emissions

There was one odour complaint in 2015.

Kepak Athleague AER 2015 5.0 Waste Management and Recycling Kepak Athleague is very aware of the environmental benefits of recycling. All clean cardboard and plastic is collected by a recognised waste recycling company. Waste paper is shredded and collected for recycling. Old and broken pallets are returned for repair and reuse, the pallets that are gone beyond repair are sent for recycling. Ink cartridges are collected and recycled. Kepak Athleague is aware of the need to reduce the volume of waste going to landfill. Prevention is the key to avoiding waste. The less amount of waste being produced the less amount of waste to dispose of.

5.1 Offsite Waste The total amount of waste disposed of in 2015 was 18,574 Tonnes.

Table 9 - Waste Produced from 2010 – 2014

Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes Waste Product 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Offal & Bone 460 896 3938 8643 8635 Sludge 2,512 1,965 2027 2195 2363 Bellygrass 1,794 1,471 2022 1616 2311 Blood 1,467 1,856 1703 2115 1408 Recyclables 32.2 30.9 28 27 32 SRM 8,377 9,172 5687 4177 3728 Mixed Municipal Waste 69.35 54.82 60 69 96 Food Waste 1.55 1.73 2 1.7 0.83 C & D 2.04 0 0 0 0 Total 14,715 15,450 15,468 18847 18574

Table 10 - Contractors and Destination of Waste

EWC Disposal Company Approval/Licence Waste Haulier Approval/License No. Destination Code Name Number

Refuse (Non- 200302 AES W0104-02 AES Tullamore Co Offaly W0104-02 Hazardous Waste) Wood 200137 AES W0104-02 AES Tullamore Co Offaly W0104-02

Cardboard 200101 OCR WCP-MO-09-0618-01 OCR Roxborough Co Roscommon WCP-MO-09-0618-01

Recyclables 200101 W.E.R.S WCP-MO009-0608-02 W.E.R.S Tuam Co Galway WCP-MO009-0608-02

Food Waste 200108 W.E.R.S WCP-MO009-0608-02 W.E.R.S Tuam Co Galway WCP-MO009-0608-02

Scrap Metal 200140 OCR WCP-MO-09-0618-01 OCR Roxborough Co Roscommon WCP-MO-09-0618-01

Kerosene 11O113 Safety Kleen CW 056 Safety Kleen Tallaght Dublin 24 W0099-01

Waste Oil 020299 Indaver Ireland WCP-DC-08-1121-01 Indaver Ireland Dublin Port Dublin 1 W0036-02

Chemical Vials 160507* Indaver Ireland WCP-DC-08-1121-01 Indaver Ireland Dublin Port Dublin 1 W0036-02

Blood 020202 Powers Licence No. 597 College Proteins Nobber Co Meath P0037-03

Approval No. SRM004 College Proteins Nobber Co Meath SRM 020202 Donohues Licence No. 1026.00 P0037-03 R911

Waste Permit No: CW104

Kepak Athleague AER 2015

EWC Disposal Company Approval/Licence Waste Haulier Approval/License No. Destination Code Name Number

Approval No. SRM004 Soft Offal / Bone 020202 Donohues Licence No. 1026.00 Farragh Proteins Crossdoney Co Cavan P0025-04 R921 Waste Permit No: CW104 Organic Waste 020204 (Sludge) Gannon

Organic Waste Transport & Approval No. NWCPO-12- Gannon Transport & Keelogues, Creggs, Co 020202 Annual NMP (Bellygrass) Environmental 11038-01 Environmental Services Galway

Organic Waste Services 020204 (Lairage)

5.2 Nutrient Management Plan All of the lands in the landbank were surveyed, including extensive soil sampling and analysis for available P, desktop hydrogeological surveying, outline of the proposed spreading areas and exclusion zones, meeting with the participating farmers, training and signing of landspreading agreements. There was 2363 Tonnes sludge, 2311 Tonnes paunch and 1544 Tonnes lairage waste produced at the Kepak Athleague facility in 2015, these figures are not expected to change greatly for 2016. All organic material will be spread on these land banks in accordance with this NMP and the Kepak Athleague Code of Practice for Land-spreading. There are 31 separate landbanks (farms) available for land spreading. This gives a total land bank of 554 ha. Of this 412 ha is available for the land spreading of organic material from Kepak Athleague.

5.2.1 Storage of Organic Waste There are 5 No. storage facilities in close proximity to the landbanks and Kepak Athleague which provide 137% of the required 18 weeks storage capacity. A summary from the proposed storage locations is provided in the table below.

6.0 Resource Management

In 2014 Kepak Athleague became the first in the beef industry to received certified accreditation to the Energy Standard ISO50001. There was a change in run time in the abattoirs with both lines running simultaneously throughout the day at a slower speed. An additional shift was also added to the boning hall production plan therefore increasing run time there also.

Table 11 - Resource Consumption

Energy Unit 2014 2015 Difference Consumption per Tonne 245.88 ltr/MT 2014 Light Fuel Oil (LFO) Litres 824,586 1,015,984 +23.21% 269.94ltr/MT 2015 177.38 kWh/ MT 2014 Electricity KWh 6,416,307 7,021,835 +9.44% 172.97 kWh/ MT 2015 4.64 m3/ MT 2014 Water Usage m3 167,910 219,425 +30.71% 5.41 m3/ MT 2015

7.0 Environmental Incidents and Non Compliances 7.1 Summary of Incidents Table 12 – Summary of Incidents

Year 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 WWTP Equipment Malfunction 0 0 0 0 0 WWTP Parameter including 0 0 0 1 6 external results Power Cut 0 0 0 1 4 Testing and Monitoring 0 0 0 0 0 equipment Off-Site Spillages 0 0 0 0 1 Odour 0 0 0 0 1 Total 0 0 0 2 12 Table 13 - Breakdown of Non-compliances Non-Compliance Action to correct Non-Compliance Comment: With regard storm water Investigation undertaken and report complied in relation to the breach of the discharge point SW2, a review of the warning limits for AS2. All storm water analysis has been trended, trends include monitoring results showed that the action and warning levels. ammonia warning level (1.01 mg/l N) was repeatedly breached in 2014 but the licence holder had not initiated any investigation into the matter.

8.0 Complaints Summary Table 14 - Summary of Complaints

Year 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Odour 1 1 0 0 5 13 Noise 0 0 3 0 0 7 Noise & Odour 0 0 0 0 0 3 Total 1 1 3 0 5 23 Table 15 – Breakdown of Complaints

Date Source of Complaint Corrective Action 14/08/2015 Alan Connaughton On receipt of the complaint an odour audit was conducted at the complainants residence. At the time of the odour audit no odours were detected. Mr Connaughton was contacted by Ciaran MacEoin to discuss the issue and to inform him of the corrective actions put into place. The blood tank levels were reviewed with odour control chemicals added to the tank to aid in the reduction of odours. Ice and odour control chemicals were also added to trailers to reduce any possible odours emanating from ABP waste. Mr Connaughton was satisfied with the outcome.

Kepak Athleague AER 2015

9.0 Objectives & Targets Table 16 – Objectives & Targets 2016 – 2020 (The 5 year objectives and targets plan has been amended in line with the Kepak Group Origin Green Plan with 2015 figures used as the baseline for setting targets ) The plan was amended in line with the change in the production plan within Athleague and the Kepak Group

Objective Method for Achievement Responsibility Timescale Monitoring information from energy Reduce electricity usage monitoring system, identifying high use Energy Team 2020 overall by 10% areas and potential opportunities during. Monitor information from monitoring 2020 Reduce total emissions by system and identify high use items and Energy Team 10% potential opportunities. SEU’s identified on each site. 2020 Reduce boiler electricity Opportunities registers in place Energy Team usage by 10% identifying potential energy saving projects 2016

Reduce landfill waste to Review with waste contractor to be Energy Team Zero removed off site for incineration

Monitoring information from water 2020 monitoring system, identifying high use areas and potential opportunities. . Reduce water Implement and quantify improvements Energy Team consumption by 10% and methods of continuous improvement and embed system within the site. Through continued implementation of Zero complaints EMS procedures particularly in relation Environmental Manager Continuous to odour and noise procedures Through continued implementation of Reduction of EMS procedures particularly in relation Environmental Manager Continuous Environmental Incidents to WWPT management and operation Through continued implementation of Zero non-compliances Environmental Manager Continuous EMS procedures and EPA requirements

Kepak Athleague AER 2015

10.0 Environmental Management Programmes Report on 2015 Targets were outlined in the EMP 2015 to improve the environmental performance of the factory. The progress of these targets was as follows:

Table 17 – Summary of 2015 EMP

Target Achieved Comments Water Discharge Continue to produce consistent Yes quality in water discharged from There were no breaches to the licence for effluent discharge in 2015

WWTP Reduce volume of water discharged Increase due to a change to production run time in the abattoirs and No by 2% additional shift in boning hall Water Increase of 30.71% due to a change to production run time in the Reduce water consumption by 2% No abattoirs and additional shift in boning hall Environmental Incidents and Non- Compliances Reduce number of on-site incidents Yes Zero incidents in 2015. Reduce number of non-compliances No 1 notification of non-compliance received please refer to Table 13 above to zero Reporting Submit AER Yes Submit NMP Yes Complete and submit PRTR Yes Complete and submit RBME Yes Complaints Zero Complaints No 1 odour complaint received Waste Reduce landfill waste by 1% Increase Increase of 39% in 2015 Increase recycling by 5% Increase Decrease of 18.6% in 2014 Energy Usage Reduce energy usage by 1% Increase Increase of 9.44%

Kepak Athleague AER 2015

11.0 Environmental Management Programme for 2016

Kepak Athleague is committed to the responsible environmental management and the operation of its business activities in an environmentally responsible manner. The company is committed to fulfilling its environmental obligations and being responsible to the community in which it operates. Kepak Athleague believes that responsible environmental management is good business practise.

The following is the EMP for 2016. The targets set out in the 2016 EMP are based on the Kepak Group Origin Green Plan using 2015 figures as the baseline.

Table 18 – EMP 2015

Target Means Responsibility Timeframe Water Discharge • Continue to follow laboratory and WWTP Manual guidance Continue to produce • Continue daily meetings with environmental Environmental consistent quality in water On-Going manager and WWTP operator Manager discharged from WWTP • Continue participation in EPA Intercalibration scheme • Reduction in volume of water used during Reduce volume of water production Energy Team On-Going discharged by 2% • Promote further awareness of water and resource usage with operatives Water Usage • Monitoring information from water monitoring system, identifying high usage areas and potential opportunities Reduce water consumption • On-line meetings with operatives and training December Energy Team by 2% m3/MT • Introduction of a number of water reduction 2016 projects including reduction in 85 degree water usage, additional storage and tanks. Reduction in water in sterilisers Environmental Incidents & Non-Compliances • Daily environmental audits Reduce number of on-site Environmental December • Quarterly environmental meetings incidents Manager 2016 • Continuous implementation of EMS • Daily environmental audits • Quarterly environmental meetings • Continuous implementation of EMS • Environmental awareness training Reduce number of non- Environmental December • Continuous implementation of Odour Control compliances to zero Manager 2016 Procedure • Continuous implementation of Noise Reduction Programme • WWTP management and control

Kepak Athleague AER 2015

Target Means Responsibility Timeframe Reporting Environmental Submit AER • Submit AER March 2016 Manager Environmental December Submit NMP • Submit NMP Manager 2015 Environmental Complete and submit PRTR • Complete and submit PRTR March 2016 Manager Environmental Complete and submit RBME • Complete and submit RBME April 2015 Manager Complaints • Continuous implementation of Odour Control Procedure Environmental December Zero Complaints • Continuous implementation of Noise Reduction Manager 2016 Programme • Daily odour assessments Waste • Waste contractor moved from landfill to Environmental December Reduce landfill waste to zero incineration Manager 2016 • Continue to segregate waste & identify Increase recycling by 2% additional areas for improvement Environmental December KG/MT • Compare recycling currently undertaken on Manager 2016 other sites and trial similar procedures Energy Usage • Monitoring information from energy monitoring Reduce energy usage by 2% system, identifying high use areas and potential December Energy Team kWh/MT opportunities. 2016 • Review energy projects on site Emissions • Monitor information supplied from monitoring Reduce electricity carbon system and identify high usage items and December emissions by 2% CO potential opportunities Energy Team 2 2016 Electricity & Boiler kg/MT • Introduction of a number of projects and investigate large scale projects • Monitor information supplied from monitoring system and potential opportunities for reduction Reduce boiler energy by 2% December • Introduction of a number of fuel reduction Energy Team kWh/MT 2016 projects and investigate alternative fuel solutions

Kepak Athleague AER 2015

Appendix 1

PRTR

Kepak Athleague AER 2015

Appendix 2

Air Monitoring Reports 2015

Kepak Athleague AER 2015