DOCSLIB.ORG

Election 2000: Chretien's Third Majority

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Election 2000: Chretien's Third Majority Election 2000: Chrétien's Third Majority Introduction Contents Election 2000 was a triumph for the Liberals and especially for Prime Minister Jean Chrétien. Barely three and a half years into a majority mandate, he made the Introduction decision to call an election that few wanted. The result was his third majority government-172 seats for the Liberals in the 301-seat Parliament and 41 per cent The Big Decision of the popular vote. (The last such triple majority was Mackenzie King's in 1935, 1940 and 1945.) The victory was especially sweet because in Quebec, where he has a history of political difficulties, Chrétien won his 11th personal mandate in his The Gamble riding of Saint Maurice; and the party won 36 of 75 seats, plus the largest percentage of the popular vote of any party. The Prime Minister said he called the Pre-existing Conditions? election in part because of the battle between two conflicting visions of Canada, those of the Liberals and of the Canadian Alliance. He attempted to project the Down and Dirty image of a Liberal Party fiscally prudent, moderate, and sensitive to the needs of the disadvantaged versus a Canadian Alliance Party made up of hard-line and intolerant social and fiscal conservatives. His victory succeeded in pretty much The Failure to Unite the stopping the Alliance dead in its tracks at the Ontario border (the party won only Right two Ontario seats), and in severly reducing the political influence of the Progressive Conservatives and New Democrats. In part due to an effective The Youth Vote and a campaign by Joe Clark, Chrétien was able to assure the failure of the right to unite. Young Candidate But there was a downside to this campaign. It was one of the most negative campaigns in Canadian history, with the lowest voter turnout of any election since Discussion, Research and 1896. Chrétien fought a campaign that was more about his opponents than about Essay Questions himself and his government. Voters and his own party often viewed him as arrogant, power-hungry, and out-of-touch. Many Liberal candidates felt they won despite him. The focus of the campaign was to have been on values, ideas, and major policies, but there were few defining issues. Important platform policies-large cuts in personal income tax, paying down the national debt, the restoration of health-care funding-were common to several parties, not just the Liberals. The NiR Home Liberal platform itself was the slimmest in the last three elections. Little discussion or debate took place on many of the issues Canadians had identified as important, E-Mail such as the environment and education, raising questions about the mandate voters delivered to the Prime Minister. Chrétien's ethics and honesty were called into question during the campaign, and concerns about his involvement in a loan to CBC Learning Home a friend who owned the Auberge Grand-Mère were especially troubling. As a result, he will face real challenges during the next Parliament; some fear the negativity expressed during the campaign will continue. There is also no doubt that, politically, the country is polarized. Western alienation is even more obvious than before; the Liberals hold only 14 seats from Manitoba west. In light of his party's unsuccessful efforts to win more seats in the West, Chrétien will have to deal with his own not insignificant unpopularity there. At one point during the campaign, the Prime Minister seemed to acknowledge this unpopularity, and indicated that, should he win, he might well resign sometime during the new term. Calls for his resignation, though muted now, are likely to continue; and challengers, especially Paul Martin, are waiting for their chance to pursue the leadership and the office of prime minister. Political observers will be watching closely to see if Chrétien can improve his personal public image or whether the Prime Minister's recent triumph will be short-lived. Comprehensive News in Review Study Modules Using both the print and non-print material from various issues of News in Review, teachers and students can create comprehensive, thematic modules that are excellent for research purposes, independent assignments, and small group study. We recommend the stories indicated below for the universal issues they represent and for the archival and historic material they contain. "Western Alienation." December 1990 "Election '93: Historic Change," September 1993 "Election Polls: Taking the Pulse," October 1993 "Conservatives in Canada: What Kind of Future?" October 1996 "Election 97: The Regions Speak," September 1997 "The Return of Joe Clark: New Hope for Conservatives?" December 1998 "Stockwell Day's New Alliance," September 2000 Other Related Videos Available from CBC Learning Does your resource collection include these CBC videos? Canadian Great Speeches Canadian Parliamentary Video Election 2000: Chrétien's Third Majority The Big Decision Contents Election campaigns are complicated matters involving careful and complex decision-making. Many of these decisions are made before the campaign begins: Introduction Who will manage the overall campaign? What policies will make up the party platform? What parts of the country will offer each party the best opportunities for The Big Decision seats? Who will the individual riding candidates be? How high profile should the leader be? What outstanding candidates will be featured in special media-centred appearances? Where will the party's ads be placed and what approach will they The Gamble take? How much money will the party be able to spend? Other decisions are made during the campaign: Is the party's message getting through? If not, how do the Pre-existing Conditions? campaign managers make sure it does? How does the leader respond to an attack, or deal with a candidate's indiscretion, or discipline a rebellious riding Down and Dirty association? What policy issues should be highlighted at a particular time or in a particular place? What should be the emphasis in a given speech-positive, praising the party's policies or achievements, or negative, attacking the opponents and their The Failure to Unite the views? What parts of the country are not responding as expected? What ridings Right will benefit most from some extra attention? The Youth Vote and a As you watch this News in Review report, jot down answers to the following Young Candidate questions: 1. Why did the Prime Minister decide to call an election barely three and a half Discussion, Research and years into a five-year mandate? Essay Questions 2. Why did the Liberals decide to present a mini-budget just before the election call? 3. Why did the Liberals decide to concentrate their attack on Stockwell Day and the Canadian Alliance, practically ignoring the New Democrats and Progressive Conservatives? 4. Why did Stockwell Day decide to abandon his "campaign of respect" and attack NiR Home the Prime Minister personally? 5. Which parties seem to have been most adept at presenting their message to the voter, and to not being distracted by the decisions of other parties? E-Mail 6. When the time came for the voters to make their decision, what information had they been given about the issues, leadership, and party values? CBC Learning Home Follow-up Discussion The 2000 election has been described as one of the most negative in Canadian history. Based on your viewing of the video, what were some of the crucial decisions made by the parties and the candidates, or other factors, that allowed this negativity to develop? Which parties and candidates seemed to best concentrate on discussion and debate, rather than name-calling and invective? Comprehensive News in Review Study Modules Using both the print and non-print material from various issues of News in Review, teachers and students can create comprehensive, thematic modules that are excellent for research purposes, independent assignments, and small group study. We recommend the stories indicated below for the universal issues they represent and for the archival and historic material they contain. "Western Alienation." December 1990 "Election '93: Historic Change," September 1993 "Election Polls: Taking the Pulse," October 1993 "Conservatives in Canada: What Kind of Future?" October 1996 "Election 97: The Regions Speak," September 1997 "The Return of Joe Clark: New Hope for Conservatives?" December 1998 "Stockwell Day's New Alliance," September 2000 Other Related Videos Available from CBC Learning Does your resource collection include these CBC videos? Canadian Great Speeches Canadian Parliamentary Video Election 2000: Chrétien's Third Majority The Gamble Contents It was an enormous gamble on the part of the Prime Minister. After only three and a half years in office, with a majority government, Jean Chrétien chose to attempt Introduction to win a third such mandate. Despite the significant lead for the Liberals shown in polls taken prior to the calling of the election, a minority of his own party supported The Big Decision him in this decision. Many felt he called it because of a love for power, and saw it as a desperate attempt by Chrétien to assure a third term as prime minister and to avoid making way for a new party leader. It was seen as a special slap in the face The Gamble for supporters of Paul Martin, who was actively supported by many caucus members as a popular replacement for Chrétien. This speculation was further Pre-existing Conditions? encouraged when, just before calling the election, the Prime Minister invited Brian Tobin, the premier of Newfoundland and another potential leadership candidate, to Down and Dirty join the federal cabinet. Leaders of other parties were unanimous in their condemnation of the election call. Stockwell Day of the Canadian Alliance accused the Prime Minister of calling the election "for no good reason," although it should The Failure to Unite the be noted that Day had challenged Chrétien to an election battle.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Journaux Journals
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 37th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION 37e LÉGISLATURE, 1re SESSION Journals Journaux No. 12 No 12 Tuesday, February 13, 2001 Le mardi 13 février 2001 10:00 a.m. 10 heures The Clerk informed the House of the unavoidable absence of the Le Greffier informe la Chambre de l’absence inévitable du Speaker. Président. Whereupon, Mr. Kilger (Stormont — Dundas — Charlotten- Sur ce, M. Kilger (Stormont — Dundas — Charlottenburgh), burgh), Deputy Speaker and Chairman of Committees of the Vice–président et président des Comités pléniers, assume la Whole, took the Chair, pursuant to subsection 43(1) of the présidence, conformément au paragraphe 43(1) de la Loi sur le Parliament of Canada Act. Parlement du Canada. PRAYERS PRIÈRE DAILY ROUTINE OF BUSINESS AFFAIRES COURANTES ORDINAIRES PRESENTING REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES PRÉSENTATION DE RAPPORTS DE COMITÉS Mr. Lee (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the M. Lee (secrétaire parlementaire du leader du gouvernement à la Government in the House of Commons), from the Standing Chambre des communes), du Comité permanent de la procédure et Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented the des affaires de la Chambre, présente le 1er rapport de ce Comité, 1st Report of the Committee, which was as follows: dont voici le texte : The Committee recommends, pursuant to Standing Orders 104 Votre Comité recommande, conformément au mandat que lui and 114, that the list of members and associate members for confèrent les articles 104 et 114 du Règlement, que la liste
    [Show full text]
  • Chretien Consensus
    End of the CHRÉTIEN CONSENSUS? Jason Clemens Milagros Palacios Matthew Lau Niels Veldhuis Copyright ©2017 by the Fraser Institute. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. The authors of this publication have worked independently and opinions expressed by them are, therefore, their own, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Fraser Institute or its supporters, Directors, or staff. This publication in no way implies that the Fraser Institute, its Directors, or staff are in favour of, or oppose the passage of, any bill; or that they support or oppose any particular political party or candidate. Date of issue: March 2017 Printed and bound in Canada Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data End of the Chrétien Consensus? / Jason Clemens, Matthew Lau, Milagros Palacios, and Niels Veldhuis Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-0-88975-437-9 Contents Introduction 1 Saskatchewan’s ‘Socialist’ NDP Begins the Journey to the Chrétien Consensus 3 Alberta Extends and Deepens the Chrétien Consensus 21 Prime Minister Chrétien Introduces the Chrétien Consensus to Ottawa 32 Myths of the Chrétien Consensus 45 Ontario and Alberta Move Away from the Chrétien Consensus 54 A New Liberal Government in Ottawa Rejects the Chrétien Consensus 66 Conclusions and Recommendations 77 Endnotes 79 www.fraserinstitute.org d Fraser Institute d i ii d Fraser Institute d www.fraserinstitute.org Executive Summary TheChrétien Consensus was an implicit agreement that transcended political party and geography regarding the soundness of balanced budgets, declining government debt, smaller and smarter government spending, and competi- tive taxes that emerged in the early 1990s and lasted through to roughly the mid-2000s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Requisites of Leadership in the Modern House of Commons 1
    Number 4 November 2001 CANADIAN STUDY OF PARLIAMENT GROUP HE EQUISITES OF EADERSHIP THE REQUISITES OF LEADERSHIP IN THE MODERN HOUSE OF COMMONS Paper by: Cristine de Clercy Department of Political Studies University of Saskatchewan Canadian Members of the Study of Parliament Executive Committee Group 2000-2001 The Canadian Study of President Parliament Group (CSPG) was created Leo Doyle with the object of bringing together all those with an interest in parliamentary Vice-President institutions and the legislative F. Leslie Seidle process, to promote understanding and to contribute to their reform and Past President improvement. Judy Cedar-Wilson The constitution of the Canadian Treasurer Study of Parliament Group makes Antonine Campbell provision for various activities, including the organization of conferences and Secretary seminars in Ottawa and elsewhere in James R. Robertson Canada, the preparation of articles and various publications, the Counsellors establishment of workshops, the Dianne Brydon promotion and organization of public William Cross discussions on parliamentary affairs, David Docherty participation in public affairs programs Jeff Heynen on radio and television, and the Tranquillo Marrocco sponsorship of other educational Louis Massicotte activities. Charles Robert Jennifer Smith Membership is open to all those interested in Canadian legislative institutions. Applications for membership and additional information concerning the Group should be addressed to the Secretariat, Canadian Study of Parliament Group, Box 660, West Block, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0A6. Tel: (613) 943-1228, Fax: (613) 995- 5357. INTRODUCTION This is the fourth paper in the Canadian Study of Parliament Groups Parliamentary Perspectives. First launched in 1998, the perspective series is intended as a vehicle for distributing both studies prepared by academics and the reflections of others who have a particular interest in these themes.
    [Show full text]
  • INSIDE CANADA's FAR RIGHT NETWORK, by Warren Kinsella (Toronto: Harpercollins Publishers, 1994)
    BOOK REVIEWS 835 WEB OF HATE: INSIDE CANADA'S FAR RIGHT NETWORK, by Warren Kinsella (Toronto: HarperCollins Publishers, 1994) [The antiscmite] is a man who is afraid ... of himself, of his conscience, his freedom, of his instincts, of his responsibilities, of solitude, of change, of society and the world ... Antisemitism, in a word, is fear of man's fate. The antisemite is the man who wants to be pitiless stone, furious torrent, devastating lightning: in short, everything but a man. 1 Warren Kinsella's message in Web of Hate'- is that racism is alive, well, and growing in Canada. Kinsella focuses on white men who hate. It is difficult to define those whom they hate: they hate all who are not like them; they hate people of colour and people who do not share their language or traditions; but, most of all, they hate the Jewish community. Anti-semiti~m seems to be the symbol of their racism, the banner under which they march. While Web of Hate should interest the general reader, it is, in many ways, a book for lawyers. Lawyers both historical 3 and contemporary 4 populate its pages. The book relates technical evidential issues that arose in hate crime trials, including a "present memory refreshed" issue in the trial of a Manitoba Klan leader; the qualification of an "expert" in the Keegstra trial; and a false distinction Doug Christie sought to draw in the Finta trial respecting the weight of testimony taken on oath and on affirmation. 5 Kinsella also poses the problem of adapting existing hate legislation and its enforcement to new computer technology, particularly to the transmission of hate literature by electronic mail from the United States to Canada.6 Despite its legal appeal, Web of Hate is primarily a work of journalism.
    [Show full text]
  • CANADA's REFUGEE DETERMINATION SYSTEM in a POST 9/11 ERA by Sandra-Marie Virgili, Honours BA, University of T
    DOUBLY FLAWED: CANADA’S REFUGEE DETERMINATION SYSTEM IN A POST 9/11 ERA by Sandra-Marie Virgili, Honours BA, University of Toronto, 2012 A Major Research Paper presented to Ryerson University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Program of Immigration and Settlement Studies Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2013 ©Sandra-Marie Virgili 2013 AUTHOR'S DECLARATION FOR ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF A MRP I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this Major Research Paper. This is a true copy of the MRP, including any required final revisions. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this MRP to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this MRP by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my MRP may be made electronically available to the public. Sandra-Marie Virgili ii DOUBLY FLAWED: CANADA’S REFUGEE DETERMINATION SYSTEM IN A POST 9/11 ERA Sandra-Marie Virgili Master of Arts 2013 Immigration and Settlement Studies Ryerson University ABSTRACT Canada’s refugee determination system not only remains vulnerable to terrorist exploitation but also fails to assist legitimate refugees in a post 9/11 era. Through conducting an analysis of the Immigration Act, this paper exemplifies how, historically, Canada has had difficulty in regulating refugee migration into the country. The Immigration and Refugee Protection Act was implemented as a means of overhauling the Immigration Act, making for a more secure Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vitality of Quebec's English-Speaking Communities: from Myth to Reality
    SENATE SÉNAT CANADA THE VITALITY OF QUEBEC’S ENGLISH-SPEAKING COMMUNITIES: FROM MYTH TO REALITY Report of the Standing Senate Committee on Official Languages The Honourable Maria Chaput, Chair The Honourable Andrée Champagne, P.C., Deputy Chair October 2011 (first published in March 2011) For more information please contact us by email: [email protected] by phone: (613) 990-0088 toll-free: 1 800 267-7362 by mail: Senate Committee on Official Languages The Senate of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0A4 This report can be downloaded at: http://senate-senat.ca/ol-lo-e.asp Ce rapport est également disponible en français. Top photo on cover: courtesy of Morrin Centre CONTENTS Page MEMBERS ORDER OF REFERENCE PREFACE INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 1 QUEBEC‘S ENGLISH-SPEAKING COMMUNITIES: A SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE ........................................................... 4 QUEBEC‘S ENGLISH-SPEAKING COMMUNITIES: CHALLENGES AND SUCCESS STORIES ...................................................... 11 A. Community life ............................................................................. 11 1. Vitality: identity, inclusion and sense of belonging ......................... 11 2. Relationship with the Francophone majority ................................. 12 3. Regional diversity ..................................................................... 14 4. Government support for community organizations and delivery of services to the communities ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Canada and the Middle East Today: Electoral Politics and Foreign Policy
    CANADA AND THE MIDDLE EAST TODAY: ELECTORAL POLITICS AND FOREIGN POLICY Donald Barry Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper came to power in 2006 with little experience in foreign affairs but with a well developed plan to transform his minority Conservative administration into a majority government replacing the Liberals as Canada’s “natural governing party.”1 Because his party’s core of Anglo-Protestant supporters was not large enough to achieve this goal, Harper appealed to non- traditional Conservatives, including Jews, on the basis of shared social values. His efforts were matched by those of Jewish leaders and the government of Israel to win the backing of the government and its followers in the face of declining domestic support for Israel and the rise of militant Islamic fundamentalism. These factors accelerated a change in Canada’s Middle East policy that began under Prime Minister Paul Martin, from a carefully balanced stance to one that overwhelm- ingly favors Israel. Harper’s “pro-Israel politics,” Michelle Collins observes, has “won the respect—and support—of a large segment of Canada’s organized Jewish community.”2 However, it has isolated Canada from significant shifts in Middle East diplomacy and marginalized its ability to play a constructive role in the region. Harper and the Jewish Vote When he became leader of the Canadian Alliance party, which merged with the Progressive Conservatives to form the Conservative Party of Canada in 2004, Tom Flanagan says that Harper realized “The traditional Conservative base of Anglophone Protestants [was] too narrow to win modern Canadian elections.”3 In a speech to the conservative organization Civitas, in 2003, Harper argued that the only way to achieve power was to focus not on the tired wish list of economic conservatives or “neo-cons,” as they’d become known, but on what he called “theo-cons”—those social conservatives who care passionately about hot-button issues that turn on family, crime, and defense.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Imperialism and Exclusion in Canadian Parliamentary Talk About International Students Dale M
    Document generated on 09/30/2021 3:06 a.m. Canadian Journal of Higher Education Revue canadienne d'enseignement supérieur Border Imperialism and Exclusion in Canadian Parliamentary Talk about International Students Dale M. McCartney Special Issue: Emerging Issues in the Internationalization of Cdn. Article abstract Higher Ed. Although there is a rich critical literature examining international student Volume 50, Number 4, 2020 policy in Canada, very little of it considers the views of Members of Parliament. MPs have limited direct influence over international student policy, but their URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1075830ar policy talk about international students defines the context within which such DOI: https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v50i4.188831 policy is developed. For that reason Parliamentary debate deserves study. This paper examines MPs’ discussion of international students between 1984 and 2019, tracing themes in MP policy talk over the globalization era. It finds that See table of contents MPs evince remarkably consistent attitudes towards international students. Throughout the period MP policy talk shows that Parliamentarians saw international students as outsiders who were only ofvalue to the extent that Publisher(s) they could be made to serve Canada’s economic or political agenda. The uniformity of this attitude and the lack of dissenting voices suggest that MPs’ Canadian Society for the Study of Higher Education views may be a significant barrier to reforming international student policy in Canada. ISSN 2293-6602 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article McCartney, D. (2020). Border Imperialism and Exclusion in Canadian Parliamentary Talk about International Students. Canadian Journal of Higher Education / Revue canadienne d'enseignement supérieur, 50(4), 37–51.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust-Denial Literature: a Fourth Bibliography
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research York College 2000 Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Fourth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki CUNY York College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/yc_pubs/25 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Fourth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki This bibliography is a supplement to three earlier ones published in the March 1994, Decem- ber 1996, and September 1998 issues of the Bulletin of Bibliography. During the intervening time. Holocaust revisionism has continued to be discussed both in the scholarly literature and in the mainstream press, especially owing to the libel lawsuit filed by David Irving against Deb- orah Lipstadt and Penguin Books. The Holocaust deniers, who prefer to call themselves “revi- sionists” in an attempt to gain scholarly legitimacy, have refused to go away and remain as vocal as ever— Bradley R. Smith has continued to send revisionist advertisements to college newspapers (including free issues of his new publication. The Revisionist), generating public- ity for his cause. Holocaust-denial, which will be used interchangeably with Holocaust revisionism in this bib- liography, is a body of literature that seeks to “prove” that the Jewish Holocaust did not hap- pen. Although individual revisionists may have different motives and beliefs, they all share at least one point: that there was no systematic attempt by Nazi Germany to exterminate Euro- pean Jewry.
    [Show full text]
  • GOVERNMENT Rt. Hon. Arthur Meighen, June 29, 1926
    GOVERNMENT 607 Rt. Hon. Arthur Meighen, June 29, 1926 — With the enactment of the Ministries and September 25, 1926 Ministers of State Act (Government Organization Rt. Hon. William Lyon Mackenzie King, September 25, Act, 1970), five categories of ministers ofthe Crown 1926 — August 6, 1930 may be identified: departmental ministers, ministers with special parliamentary responsibilities, ministers Rt. Hon. Richard Bedford Bennett, August 7, 1930 — without portfolio, and three types of ministers of October 23, 1935 state. Ministers of state for designated purposes may Rt. Hon. William Lyon Mackenzie King, October 23, head a ministry of state created by proclamafion. 1935 — November 15, 1948 They are charged with developing new and compre­ Rt. Hon. Louis Stephen St-Laurent, November 15, hensive policies in areas of particular urgency and 1948 -June 21, 1957 importance and have a mandate determined by the Rt. Hon. John George Dicfenbaker, June 21, 1957 — Governor-in-Council. They may have powers, duties April 22, 1963 and functions and exercise supervision and control of elements of the public service, and may seek Rt. Hon. Lester Bowles Pearson, April 22, 1963 — April 20, 1968 parliamentary appropriations to cover the cost of their staff and operations. Other ministers of state Rt. Hon. Pierre EllioU Trudeau, April 20, 1968 — may be appointed to assist departmental ministers June 4, 1979 with their responsibilities. They may have powers, Rt. Hon. Joe Clark, June 4, 1979 — March 3, 1980 duties and functions delegated to them by the Rt. Hon. Pierre EllioU Trudeau, March 3, 1980 — departmental minister, who retains ultimate legal June 30, 1984 responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Annual Report
    Looking forward The future of womenÕs health The New Women’s College Hospital Annual Report 2006 Azeena Ratansi Occupational Therapist Dr. John Semple Surgeon in Chief Dr. Catherine Classen Academic Leader, Trauma Therapy Program Director, Women’s Mental Health Research Message from the Chair, Board of Directors Michele Landsberg What a wonderful year it has been! Just weeks after Minister of Health and Long-Term Care, the Honourable George Smitherman, announced that independent governance was being restored to our cherished hospital, I was honoured and challenged to be elected Chair of your Board of Directors. I want to thank all of you for your support and encouragement. In a spirited collaboration, we are working together to ensure that The New Women’s College Hospital regains our rightful place as a leader in women’s healthcare, research and education while carving out our new role as Ontario’s first and only academic ambulatory care hospital. This has been an unbelievably eventful year. With the dedicated and vigorous facilitation of the Honourable Elinor Caplan and her team, the de-amalgamation negotiations proceeded rapidly, and our new status as an independent hospital under the Public Hospitals Act was achieved in only seven months. Although we continue to have extensive partnerships with Sunnybrook for corporate and other services, and continue to host their Perinatal and Gynaecology program for the near term, we have also been able to initiate strategic partnerships with many other institutions and care providers, and our skilled hospital staff have been energetically pursuing these opportunities. The Board has been equally hard-working.
    [Show full text]
  • The 15Th Annual All Politics Poll: the Best and Worst of Federal Politics, by the Hill Times and Angus Reid 1
    THE HILL TIMES, MONDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2011 25 FEATURE: ANNUAL SURVEY & POLITICS The 15th Annual All Politics Poll: The Best and Worst of Federal Politics, By The Hill Times and Angus Reid 1. Who was this year’s most valuable politician? 14. Which former prime minister do you most admire? Former NDP leader Jack Layton 35% Lester B. Pearson 16% Prime Minister Stephen Harper 23% John A. Macdonald 16% Immigration Minister Jason Kenney 10% Pierre Trudeau 15% 2. Who was this year’s least valuable politician? 15. Who was the best Cabinet minister in 2011? Former Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff 25% Immigration Minister Jason Kenney 20% Treasury Board President Tony Clement 11% Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird 18% NDP MP Pat Martin 6% Finance Minister Jim Flaherty 11% 3. Which public figure do you wish had run in the 16. Who was the worst Cabinet minister in 2011? last election? President of the Treasury Board Tony Clement 25% Former Cabinet minister Stockwell Day 7% None 14% Stephen Lewis 5% Minister of International Cooperation Bev Oda 12% Stockwell Day 7% Don Cherry, Mark Carney, Bernard Lord 4% 17. Which Cabinet minister most respects parliament? 4. Who is your favourite up-and-comer politician? None 20% Conservative MP Chris Alexander 7% Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird 8% Conservative MP Ted Opitz 7% Immigration Minister Jason Kenney 8% NDP MP Alexandre Boulerice 5% Conservative MP Kellie Leitch 5% 18. Who is the most approachable member of Cabinet? Liberal MP Justin Trudeau 5% Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird 18% Conservative MP Candice Hoeppner 5% None 13% Immigration Minister Jason Kenney 9% 5.
    [Show full text]