Aquatic Conservation Assessments (ACA), Using Aquabamm, for the Riverine Wetlands of the Great Barrier Reef Catchment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aquatic Conservation Assessments (ACA), Using Aquabamm, for the Riverine Wetlands of the Great Barrier Reef Catchment Aquatic Conservation Assessments (ACA) using AquaBAMM for the riverine wetlands of the Great Barrier Reef catchment Version 1.1 October 2009 Published by the Department of Environment and Resource Management, Queensland Government The State of Queensland, Department of Environment and Resource Management 2009. This work is copyright. It may be reproduced for study, research or training purposes subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source and no commercial usage or sale. Reproduction for purposes other than those listed above requires the prior written permission of the Department of Environment and Resource Management. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Manager, Media and Corporate Relations Unit, Public Affairs Division, PO Box 15155 City East BRISBANE QLD 4002 Australia. Disclaimer: Information in this document does not necessarily represent Government policy. While this publication has been prepared with care, the Queensland Government accepts no liability for any decisions or actions taken on the basis of this document. Cite this document as: Inglis, S.N. and Howell, S. (2009). Aquatic Conservation Assessments (ACA), using AquaBAMM, for the riverine wetlands of the Great Barrier Reef catchment. Published by the Department of Environment and Resource Management, Brisbane. © The State of Queensland (Department of Environment and Resource Management) 2009 Prepared by: Selena Inglis1 Principal Planning Officer Steven Howell1 Manager, Biodiversity Assessment 1 Natural Resources and Environment Division, Department of Environment and Resource Management, PO Box 15155 City East BRISBANE QLD 4002 Australia Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank Peter Macdonald, Michael Ronan, Tim Ryan, Shane Chemello, David McFarland, Anthony Morrison, Niall Connolly, Mark Kelton, Anthony Backer, Rochae Cameron, John Platten, Steve Elson, Darren Fielder, Plaxy Barratt, Wes Davidson and Bruce Wilson for their support and input to this project. Special thanks also goes to Heidi Millington for all her hard work and support throughout the project. Cover photos (from top to bottom): 1. Suttor River (be_00288) – Selena Inglis 2. Litoria fallax – Anthony Backer 3. Haughton River (ha_00017) – Selena Inglis 4. Nymphea gigantea – Selena Inglis 5. Connors River (is_00109) – Selena Inglis 6. Majors Creek (ha_00031) – Selena Inglis (background photo) Version Release Date 1.1 30/10/09 Table of contents 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 THE GREAT BARRIER REEF STUDY AREA............................................................................. 2 1.2 WET TROPICS.................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 BURDEKIN ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.4 FITZROY ............................................................................................................................ 7 2 METHODS AND IMPLEMENTATION ..................................................................... 9 2.1 AQUABAMM ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 SUBSECTIONS.................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 ASSESSMENT PARAMETERS................................................................................................ 9 2.4 DATASETS ....................................................................................................................... 12 2.5 IMPLEMENTATION ............................................................................................................. 12 2.6 TRANSPARENCY OF RESULTS............................................................................................ 24 3 RESULTS .............................................................................................................. 25 3.1 GBR CATCHMENT OVERALL RESULTS................................................................................ 25 3.1.1 AquaScore ........................................................................................................... 25 3.1.2 Criteria scores...................................................................................................... 35 3.2 SUMMARY........................................................................................................................ 38 3.2.1 Conservation value categories ............................................................................ 38 3.2.2 Broad trends ........................................................................................................ 38 3.3 CASE STUDY ONE – HERBERT CATCHMENT........................................................................ 40 3.3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 40 3.3.2 Summary of results for the Herbert catchment.................................................... 41 3.3.3 AquaScore results................................................................................................ 41 3.3.4 Criteria results...................................................................................................... 44 3.4 CASE STUDY TWO – MACKENZIE CATCHMENT .................................................................... 46 3.4.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 46 3.4.2 Summary of results for the Mackenzie catchment............................................... 46 3.4.3 AquaScore results................................................................................................ 48 3.4.4 Criteria results...................................................................................................... 50 3.5 FIELD TRUTHING .............................................................................................................. 52 3.5.1 Subsections traversed ......................................................................................... 52 3.5.2 Field interpretation of ACA results – ecological versus condition assessment ... 60 4 SUMMARY............................................................................................................. 61 5 RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................................................... 61 6 REFERENCES....................................................................................................... 62 7 ATTACHMENTS.................................................................................................... 63 ATTACHMENT A WET TROPICS AQUATIC FLORA EXPERT PANEL REPORT ................................ 63 ATTACHMENT B WET TROPICS AQUATIC FAUNA EXPERT PANEL REPORT ................................ 63 ATTACHMENT C WET TROPICS WETLAND ECOLOGY EXPERT PANEL REPORT .......................... 63 ATTACHMENT D BURDEKIN AQUATIC FLORA EXPERT PANEL REPORT ...................................... 63 ATTACHMENT E BURDEKIN AQUATIC FAUNA EXPERT PANEL REPORT...................................... 63 ATTACHMENT F BURDEKIN WETLAND ECOLOGY EXPERT PANEL REPORT ................................ 63 ATTACHMENT G FITZROY AQUATIC FLORA EXPERT PANEL REPORT......................................... 63 ATTACHMENT H FITZROY AQUATIC FAUNA EXPERT PANEL REPORT ........................................ 63 ATTACHMENT I FITZROY WETLAND ECOLOGY EXPERT PANEL REPORT................................... 63 Tables Table 1 GBR catchments subject to an ACA using AquaBAMM ................................................. 2 Table 2 CIM list for the GBR catchment....................................................................................... 9 Table 3 Stratification in study areas of the GBR catchment....................................................... 12 Table 4 Implementation table for the GBR catchment riverine ACA .......................................... 13 Table 5 AquaScore summary ..................................................................................................... 25 Table 6 AquaScore and dependability summary for all study areas .......................................... 27 Table 7 Summary by criteria....................................................................................................... 35 Table 8 Herbert catchment criteria rating distribution by AquaScore value and dependability.. 44 Table 9 catchment criteria rating distribution by AquaScore value and dependability............... 50 Table 10 Subsections inspected during field truthing by catchment .......................................... 54 Table 11 Subsections traversed during field truthing by AquaScore ......................................... 55 Figures Figure 1 The 35 GBR catchments where ACAs have been conducted ....................................... 3 Figure 2 Interrogating the ACA results for a subsection in the GIS environment ...................... 24 Figure 3 AquaScore for all catchments (coloured by subsection).............................................. 26 Figure 4 Herbert catchment AquaScore..................................................................................... 41 Figure 5 Herbert catchment dependability ................................................................................. 42
Recommended publications
  • 189930408.Pdf
    © The University of Queensland and James Cook University, 2018 Published by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority ISSN: 2208-4134 Marine Monitoring Program: Annual report for inshore pesticide monitoring 2016-2017 is licensed for use under a Creative Commons By Attribution 4.0 International licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logos of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, The University of Queensland and James Cook University, any other material protected by a trademark, content supplied by third parties and any photographs. For licence conditions see: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0 This publication should be cited as: Grant, S., Thompson, K., Paxman, C., Elisei, G., Gallen C., Tracey, D., Kaserzon, S., Jiang, H., Samanipour, S. and Mueller, J. 2018, Marine Monitoring Program: Annual report for inshore pesticide monitoring 2016-2017. Report for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville, 128 pp. A catalogue record for this publication is available from the National Library of Australia Front cover image: Turbid river plume emerging from the Russell-Mulgrave river mouth following several days of heavy rainfall in February 2015 © Dieter Tracey, 2015 DISCLAIMER While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this document are factually correct, UQ and JCU do not make any representation or give any warranty regarding the accuracy, completeness, currency or suitability for any particular purpose of the information or statements contained in this document. To the extent permitted by law UQ and JCU shall not be liable for any loss, damage, cost or expense that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • GWQ1203 - Burdekin Basin Groundwater Location Map Watercourse Cainozoic Deposits Overlying the GAB Zones
    144°0'0"E 145°0'0"E 146°0'0"E 147°0'0"E 148°0'0"E 149°0'0"E Tully 18°0'0"S This map must not be used for marine navigation. 18°0'0"S Comprehensive and updated navigation WARNING information should be obtained from published Mitchell hydrographic charts. Murray DRAFT Hinchinbrook Island Herbert r ve Ri ekin urd B Ingham ! er iv D R ry Gilbert ry Ri D v er r e iv 19°0'0"S Scattered Remnants Northern R 19°0'0"S g Burdekin Headwaters in n n R u Black Townsville ! er r iv e R v rke i la R C r ta S Ross Broken River Ayr ! er ver Riv i ry lt R Haughton go Basa e r Don and Bogie Coastal Area G h t r u ve o i ton R S h ug Ha Bowen ! 20°0'0"S 20°0'0"S r Charters Towers e v ! i Don R B n o o g i D e Riv er Bur dek in R ive r Whitsunday Island Proserpine B owe Proserpine Flinders n ! er R Riv iver e sp a R amp C o Don River l l s to n R iv C e a r North West Suttor Catchment pe R r iv ve e i r R r o t t u S r e Broken v R i iv S e R e r llh L e e i O'Connell p im t t a l R e C iv er B o w e B u r d ekin n B u r d ekin R 21°0'0"S i 21°0'0"S v e BB a a s s in in r B ro Mackay ke ! n River Pioneer Plane Sarina ! Eastern Weathered Su ttor R Cainozoic Remnants Belyandor River iv e er iv R o d n lya e B r e v i R o d Moranbah n ! a ly 22°0'0"S e 22°0'0"S l R B ae iver ich Carm r ive R Diamantina s r o n n o C Styx Belyando River Saline Tertiary Sediments Dysart ! Is a a c R iv B Clermont Middlemount er e ! ! l y an do Riv e r er iv Cooper Creek R ie nz Aramac e ! k c a M 23°0'0"S 23°0'0"S Capella
    [Show full text]
  • Fitzroy Basin Resource Operations Plan
    Fitzroy Basin Resource Operations Plan September 2014 Amended September 2015 This publication has been compiled by Water Policy—Department of Natural Resource and Mines. © State of Queensland, 2015 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Contents Chapter 1 Preliminary .............................................................................. 1 1 Short title ............................................................................................................. 1 2 Commencement of the resource operations plan amendment ............................. 1 3 Purpose of plan ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Ambient Network (Water Quality) 2020-21
    Surface Water Ambient Network (Water Quality) 2020-21 July 2020 This publication has been compiled by Natural Resources Divisional Support, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy. © State of Queensland, 2020 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Summary This document lists the stream gauging stations which make up the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy (DNRME) surface water quality monitoring network. Data collected under this network are published on DNRME’s Water Monitoring Information Data Portal. The water quality data collected includes both logged time-series and manual water samples taken for later laboratory analysis. Other data types are also collected at stream gauging stations, including rainfall and stream height. Further information is available on the Water Monitoring Information Data Portal under each station listing.
    [Show full text]
  • MITCHELL Versus LEICHHARDT
    179 A STUDY IN COMPARISONS: MITCHELL versus LEICHHARDT [By KATHLEEN EMMERSON] Comparisons are odious, is an old saying, but often they give us valuable "measuring sticks." The century-old argument as to which inland discoverer gave to what became Queensland its greater areas of valu­ able country: viz., Surveyor-General T. Mitchell or free­ lancing Ludwig Leichhardt, has never been answered. To give a correct reply, the work of a computer would be needed, to take down aU the summaries to be found in Pugh's Almanacs, Year Books, and others since 1860. LEICHHARDT'S NO. 1 BLACKFELLOW, "CHARLEY" ON JOURNEY TO PORT ESSINGTON, 1844-45. Charley's Creek, a tributary of the lower Condamine River, was named after him. "A man of uncertain temper but a first class 'cutter of bends,' also a peerless tracker." Sketch copied ftom Leichhardt's Journal of Overland Expedition to Port Essington. The beautiful Fitzroy Downs country (which enchanted young Tom Archer and his mates in 1847) as well as land adjoining the Balonne River and its northern tributaries, have in a hundred years yielded much wool and all that went with it as well as, in the course of time, beef, which had to be 180 overlanded for sale at Wodonga on the Murray, timber also (mostly in this century). The oil from Moonie, gas from Roma (both of tremend­ ous value these modern days), also their wheat, wine and grapes are items not to "be sneezed at." These and other developments make up a vast contribu­ tion from Mitchell's Country. "A BLANKY COASTER" It is not presumptuous to assert that Leichhardt's efforts— and how much more difficult his journeys were than those of the well-equipped Government servant, Mitchell—have yielded more and greater results than his rival.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impacts of Climate Change on Fitzroy River Basin, Queensland, Australia
    Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture 11 (2017) 38-47 doi: 10.17265/1934-7359/2017.01.005 D DAVID PUBLISHING The Impacts of Climate Change on Fitzroy River Basin, Queensland, Australia Nahlah Abbas1, Saleh A. Wasimi1, Surya Bhattarai2 and Nadhir Al-Ansari3 1. School of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Melbourne 3000, Australia 2. School of Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Melbourne 3000, Australia 3. Geotechnical Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, Lulea 971 87, Sweden Abstract: An analysis of historical data of Fitzroy River, which lies in the east coast of Australia, reveals that there is an increasing trend in extreme floods and droughts apparently attributable to increased variability of blue and green waters which could be due to climate change. In order to get a better understanding of the impacts of climate change on the water resources of the study area for near future as well as distant future, SWAT (soil and water assessment tool) model was applied. The model is first tested for its suitability in capturing the basin characteristics with available data, and then, forecasts from six GCMs (general circulation model) with about half-a-century lead time to 2046~2064 and about one-century lead time to 2080~2100 are incorporated to evaluate the impacts of climate change under three marker emission scenarios: A2, A1B and B1. The results showed worsening water resources regime into the future. Key words: Fitzroy basin, climate change, water resources, SWAT. 1. Introduction (soil and water assessment tool) was applied since it has found widespread application throughout the world Australia is one of the driest continents in the world [4], and after calibration and validation, GCM model and recognized as one of the most vulnerable to climate outputs were used to delineate future water regimes.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Mining on the Fitzroy River Basin
    A study of the cumulative impacts on water quality of mining activities in the Fitzroy River Basin April 2009 Acknowledgements: The Department of Environment and Resource Management (DERM) would like to thank staff from the former Departments of Natural Resources and Water, and Mines and Energy who supplied data for this report. DERM would also like to thank the operators of all coal mines within the Fitzroy Basin who kindly provided the information which formed the basis of this report. (c) The State of Queensland (Department of Environment and Resource Management) 2008 Disclaimer: While this document has been prepared with care it contains general information and does not profess to offer legal, professional or commercial advice. The Queensland Government accepts no liability for any external decisions or actions taken on the basis of this document. Persons external to the Department of Environment and Resource Management should satisfy themselves independently and by consulting their own professional advisors before embarking on any proposed course of action. Maps Source: Department of Environment and Resource Management data sets. Cadastral Information supplied by NR&W. SDRN road data ©MapInfo Australia Pty Ltd 2008 ©Public Sector Mapping Authority Australia Pty Ltd 2008. Projections Geographic Datum GDA94. 2 ACCURACY STATEMENT Due to varying sources of data, spatial locations may not coincide when overlaid DISCLAIMER Maps are compiled from information supplied to the Department of Environment and Resource Management. While all care is taken in the preparation of these maps, neither the Department nor its officers or staff accept any responsibility for any loss or damage which may result from inaccuracy or omission in the maps from the use of the information contained therein.
    [Show full text]
  • Cairns Regional Council Water and Waste Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Public Environment Report
    Cairns Regional Council Water and Waste Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Public Environment Report November 2009 Contents Executive Summary i Abbreviations ix Glossary of Terms x 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Objectives and Scope 1 1.3 Background to the Development of the Action 4 1.4 Relationship of the Action to Other Actions that May be Affected 5 1.5 Current Status of the Action 5 1.6 Consequence of the Action Not Proceeding 5 2. Description of the Action 7 2.1 Location 7 2.2 Detailed Proposal 10 2.3 Additional Licences / Permits and Approval Requirements required by the Project 15 3. Methodologies 23 3.1 Background and Approach 23 3.2 Demarcation of the Aquifer study area 23 3.3 Overview of Ecological Values Descriptions 26 3.4 PER Guidelines 26 3.5 Desktop and Database Assessments 27 3.6 Environmental Flows Assessment 30 3.7 Bore Testing and Modelling Verification 31 3.8 Derivation of Risk Assessment Methodologies 34 3.9 Stakeholder and Community Engagement 37 4. Description of the Environment – Physical Aspects 40 4.1 Information Sources 40 4.2 Climate 40 4.3 Topography 41 4.4 Surface Drainage Features 43 4.5 Soils 43 42/15610/99537 Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Public Environment Report 4.6 Geology 48 4.7 Hydrogeology 51 4.8 Groundwater 53 4.9 Social Environment 54 5. Description of the Environment – Ecological 57 5.1 Information Sources 57 5.2 Species of National Environmental Significance 57 5.3 Queensland Species of Conservation Significance 65 5.4 Pest Species 68 5.5 Vegetation Communities 70 5.6 Regional Ecosystem Types and Integrity 73 5.7 Aquatic Values 76 5.8 World Heritage and National Heritage Values 95 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Flood Plumes in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia
    Spatial and temporal patterns of flood plumes in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia Thesis submitted by Michelle Jillian Devlin BSc (Bendigo College of Advanced Education (Latrobe University) Msc (James Cook University) February 2005 Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Tropical Environment Studies and Geography Department, James Cook University. Spatial and temporal patterns of flood plumes in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia 1 STATEMENT OF ACCESS I, the undersigned, author of this work, understand that James Cook University will make this thesis available for use within the University Library and, via the Australian Digital Theses network, for use elsewhere. I understand that, as an unpublished work, a thesis has significant protection under the Copyright Act and; I do not wish to place any further restriction on access to this work. _________________________ ______________ Signature Date Spatial and temporal patterns of flood plumes in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia 2 STATEMENT OF SOURCES DECLARATION I declare that this thesis is my own work and has not been submitted in any form for another degree or diploma at any university or other institution of tertiary education. Information derived from the published or unpublished work of others has been acknowledged in the text and a list of references is given. ____________________________________ ____________________ Signature Date Spatial and temporal patterns of flood plumes in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia 3 Papers arising from this thesis Devlin , M., Brodie, J, Waterhouse, J., Mitchell, A., Audas, D. and Haynes, D. (2003). Exposure of Great Barrier Reef inner-shelf reefs to river-borne contaminants.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of the Black Mangrove Cichlid (Tilapia Mariae) in Australia
    Distribution of the black mangrove cichlid (Tilapia mariae) in Australia The black mangrove cichlid or ‘spotted tilapia’ is a species of deep-bodied fish belonging to the family Cichlidae. Native to West Africa, its distribution extends from the The first documented Ivory Coast through Ghana and Nigeria to Cameroon1. Introduction to Australia: discovery of introduced black mangrove cichlids in Throughout this range the species is often found in the Australian waterways was in the 1970s in the Hazelwood deeper sections of larger rivers and lagoons but also pondage, Victoria. During the 1980s, a population of black moves into flowing streams during the rainy season1. mangrove cichlids was discovered in coastal rivers in the Black mangrove cichlids have become a desirable Wet Tropics World Heritage Area of north Queensland3. aquarium species as they are hardy, readily reproduce These introductions occurred despite the species being and have attractive body and fin colouration2. This on the prohibited import list since the 1960s. The precise popularity has led to the species being exported to many origin of the illegal importations is still unknown but it is countries outside Africa. The ability of black mangrove thought to have been through the ornamental fish trade. cichlids to adapt to a wide range of ecological conditions More black mangrove cichlids have since been released has enabled them to become a highly invasive pest. For into the wild, either deliberately or accidently, and have example, in the United States the black mangrove cichlid formed self-sustaining populations. has established self-sustaining populations in several states, including Florida, Arizona, California and Nevada3.
    [Show full text]
  • Erosion Processes and Sources in the Burdekin Dry Tropics Catchment (RP65G)
    Erosion processes and sources in the Burdekin Dry Tropics catchment (RP65G) Synthesis Report Chemistry Centre, Landscape Sciences June 2015 Identifying erosion processes and sources in the Burdekin Dry Tropics catchment (RP65G) – Synthesis Report Prepared by Project team members Joanne Burton a (Project Leader) Taka Furuichi a (KG2 Section Leader) Stephen Lewis b (KG3 Section Leader) Jon Olley c Scott Wilkinson d (KG1 Section Leader) Zoe Bainbridge b a: Department of Science, IT, Innovation and Arts, Brisbane, QLD b: Centre for Tropical Water and Aquatic Ecosystem Research, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD c: Australian River Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD d: CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra, ACT Landscape Sciences Science Division Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation PO Box 5078 Brisbane QLD 4001 © The State of Queensland (Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation) 2015 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence Under this licence you are free, without having to seek permission from DSITI, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland, Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Disclaimer This document has been prepared with all due diligence and care, based on the best available information at the time of publication. The department holds no responsibility for any errors or omissions within this document.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Protecting and Conserving the Wet Tropics
    The Importance of Protecting and Conserving the Wet Tropics Synthesis of NERP Tropical Ecosystems Hub Tropical Rainforest Research Outputs 2011-2014 Compiled by RRRC The Importance of Protecting and Conserving the Wet Tropics A Synthesis of NERP Tropical Ecosystems Hub Tropical Rainforest Research Outputs 2011-2014 Julie Carmody, Helen Murphy, Ro Hill, Carla Catterall, Steve Goosem, Allan Dale, David Westcott, Justin Welbergen, Luke Shoo, Natalie Stoeckl, Michelle Esparon Supported by the Australian Government’s National Environmental Research Program © Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: 978-1-925088-60-1 This report should be cited as: Carmody, J., Murphy, H., Hill, R., Catterall, C., Goosem, S., Dale, A., Westcott, D., Welbergen, J., Shoo, L., Stoeckl, N., Esparon, M. (2015) The Importance of Protecting and Conserving the Wet Tropics: A synthesis of NERP Tropical Ecosystems Hub Tropical Rainforest Outputs 2011-2014. Report to the National Environmental Research Program. Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited, Cairns (6 4pp.). Published by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre on behalf of the Australian Government’s National Environmental Research Program (NERP) Tropical Ecosystems (TE) Hub. The Tropical Ecosystems Hub is part of the Australian Government’s National Environmental Research Program. The NERP TE Hub is administered in North Queensland by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited (RRRC). The NERP Tropical Ecosystem Hub addresses issues of concern for the management, conservation and sustainable use of the World Heritage listed Great Barrier Reef (GBR) and its catchments, tropical rainforests including the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area (WTWHA), and the terrestrial and marine assets underpinning resilient communities in the Torres Strait, through the generation and transfer of world-class research and shared knowledge.
    [Show full text]