DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1904.09188V1 [Astro-Ph.EP] 19 Apr 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1904.09188V1 [Astro-Ph.EP] 19 Apr 2019 DRAFT VERSION APRIL 22, 2019 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX61 THE digest2 NEO CLASSIFICATION CODE SONIA KEYS,1 PETER VEREŠ,1 MATTHEW J. PAYNE,1 MATTHEW J. HOLMAN,1 ROBERT JEDICKE,2 GARETH V. WILLIAMS,1 TIM SPAHR,3 DAVID J. ASHER ,4 AND CARL HERGENROTHER5 1Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St., MS 51, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 2Institute for Astronomy, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA 3NEO Sciences, LLC, 1308 Applebriar Lane, Marlborough, MA 01752, USA 4Armagh Observatory and Planetarium, College Hill, Armagh, BT61 9DG, UK 5Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA Submitted to PASP, Day Month Year ABSTRACT We describe the digest2 software package, a fast, short-arc orbit classifier for small Solar System bodies. The digest2 algorithm has been serving the community for more than 13 years. The code provides a score, D2, which represents a pseudo-probability that a tracklet belongs to a given Solar System orbit type. digest2 is primarily used as a classifier for Near-Earth Object (NEO) candidates, to identify those to be prioritized for follow-up observation. We describe the historical development of digest2 and demonstrate its use on real and synthetic data. We find that digest2 can accurately and precisely distinguish NEOs from non- NEOs. At the time of detection, 14% of NEO tracklets and 98.5% of non-NEOs tracklets have D2 below the critical value of D2 = 65. 94% of our simulated NEOs achieved the maximum D2 = 100 and 99.6% of NEOs achieved D2 ≥ 65 at least once during the simulated 10-year timeframe. We demonstrate that D2 varies as a function of time, rate of motion, magnitude and sky-plane location, and show that NEOs tend to have lower D2 at low Solar elongations close to the ecliptic. We use our findings to recommend future development directions for the digest2 code. Keywords: short-arc orbit determination, asteroids, Near-Earth Object, Minor Planet Center arXiv:1904.09188v1 [astro-ph.EP] 19 Apr 2019 Corresponding author: Peter Vereš [email protected] 2 KEYS ET AL. 1. INTRODUCTION (NEOCP3). These objects are prioritized by the NEO follow- Near-Earth Objects (NEOs), defined as any small Solar up community for additional observations. System body having perihelion less than 1.3au, are of sig- In this manuscript we describe the digest2 code. The code nificant interest for a number of reasons. These include plan- as implemented has been used by the community for a num- etary defense, spacecraft missions, commercial development, ber of years. Our primary goal is to describe and document and investigations into the origin and evolution of the Solar the major elements of digest2 and the practical consequences System. The NEO discovery rate has risen rapidly in recent of its design and implementation. Although we highlight decades, driven by the 1998 Congressional mandate to dis- possible areas of improvement, these are left for future work. cover 90% of NEOs larger than 1 km (the Spaceguard Sur- 2. METHODOLOGY vey Morrison 1992), and the subsequent 2005 Congressional mandate to discover 90% of NEOs larger than 140 m (George The observations from a short-arc tracklet directly con- _ E. Brown, Jr. NEO Survey Act 1). strain the position, (α;δ), and motion, (α;_ δ), of the asteroid Solar System objects are typically identified through their in the sky, but the topocentric radial-distance, ρ, and radial- apparent motion in a series of images spanning minutes to velocity, ρ_, between the asteroid and the observer are essen- hours. Given such a sequence of exposures, it is straight- tially unconstrained. This is the fundamental challenge of forward to identify “tracklets” (Kubica et al. 2007), sets of orbit determination. detections that are consistent with an object with a fixed rate An assumed ρ allows a heliocentric position to be derived of motion. A related term is an arc, which may contain any (see AppendixA), and with the assumption of a topocentric number of tracklets, possibly from different observatories. ρ_, a heliocentric velocity can also be calculated. Milani et al. The time span from first to last observation is termed the arc- (2004) refer to the “admissible region” as being the set of length. (ρ,ρ_) for which the resultant orbit is heliocentrically bound It is straightforward to determine whether a tracklet rep- (elliptical w.r.t. the Sun). resents a known object with a well defined orbit. In that Many authors have addressed the problem of short-arc or- case, the observations coincide with the predicted positions bit determination and constraint (e.g. Väisälä 1939; Mars- for the known object. Otherwise, the tracklet likely repre- den 1985; Bowell 1989; Bowell et al. 1990; Marsden 1991; sents a newly discovered object. It is then of interest to deter- Tholen & Whiteley 2000; Milani et al. 2004; Milani & mine what type of orbit that object has, and in particular, if Kneževic´ 2005; Oszkiewicz et al. 2009; Spoto et al. 2018, it is a new NEO. Given limited telescopic resources, it is not and discussions therein). Of particular relevance to digest2, possible to re-observe all objects to immediately determine in the late 1980s and early 1990s, R. H. McNaught of the their orbits. It is therefore essential to identify which objects Siding Spring Observatory undertook an extensive effort to are more likely to be NEOs and prioritize those for further determine allowable orbital element ranges and class-specific observation. object probabilities based on two observations and a magni- Although a tracklet does not uniquely determine an orbit, tude (PANGLOSS McNaught 1999). The method proceeded characteristic sky-plane motion can be used to infer a possi- by stepping through a range of possible topocentric distances ble orbit type (e.g. Jedicke 1996). The tool currently used for and angles (between the velocity vector and the line of sight) this is digest22. The digest2 code uses only a single motion which were consistent with the observations and bound to the vector, derived from a tracklet or short arc, to identify all pos- sun. PANGLOSS used a population model to assign weights sible elliptical orbits consistent with that motion. This set of to different orbit classes. The PANGLOSS code provided the possible orbits is then divided into disjoint orbital categories. foundation for the digest2 code described in this manuscript. Given a population model that represents the number of solar We review two related methods for addressing the problem system objects of each type, we can estimate the likelihood of short-arc orbits. The first concerns the technique referred that the tracklet represent a member of each category. to as “statistical ranging” (Virtanen et al. 2001), in which With a suitable threshold, digest2 can serve as an NEO two observations are selected from the tracklet, thus fixing (α;α;δ;_ δ_), and then topocentric ranges at each of the epochs binary classifier. Tracklets with high digest2 scores, D2, are posted on the Near-Earth Object Confirmation Page of the two observations are randomly chosen and a corre- sponding orbit computed from the admissible region that is compatible with the observational tracklet data. This process 1 Section 321 of the NASA Authorization Act of 2005 (Public Law No. is repeated over many random topocentric distances to gen- 109-155) erate a set of compatible orbits. 2 There is no known history of a digest1; this is not version 2 of a pro- gram. Also nothing is known about the origin or meaning of the name. The program name is simply digest2. 3 http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/NEO/ toconfirm_tabular.html THE digest2 NEO CLASSIFICATION CODE 3 The second method refers to “systematic ranging”. This method was introduced by Chesley(2005) and is described in detail in Farnocchia et al.(2015). In this method, a sys- tematic raster over (ρ,ρ_) space is performed, generating an orbit for each and comparing to all tracklet observations. The RMS of the fit residuals for each (ρ,ρ_) point indicates the quality of the fit, and χ2 probabilities can be used to derive confidence regions in (ρ,ρ_) space. While digest2 is not directly derived from either Virtanen et al.(2001) or Chesley(2005) (and the P ANGLOSS ranging code, from which digest2 is derived, predates both), the di- gest2 code uses the same fundamental approach that is com- mon to both statistical and systematic ranging techniques: sets of bound heliocentric orbits are generated that all satisfy the short-arc observations. 2.1. Historical Development of digest2 As described above, the early origins of the digest2 were the PANGLOSS code developed by R. McNaught. The cur- rent version of digest2 evolved from a FORTRAN 77 code (“223.f”) employed in Jedicke(1996), and then further Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the construction of two-element developed by C. Hergenrother and T. Spahr from the PAN- tracklets within digest2 for short-arcs (< 3hrs: top-left), space- GLOSS code of R. McNaught. It accepted observation files in based data (top-right), and long-arcs (≥ 3hrs: bottom). Detections the MPC’s 80-character format4, encoded the vector solution are plotted as red circles along their underlying path (gray dotted described in section 3.2, employed the parabolic limit de- line); The two-element tracklets constructed by digest2 are the blue scribed in appendixA, and used the model population look- squares and dashed lines. A detailed description of the algorithm up described in section 3.3. used to construct the two-element tracklets is provided in the text of Since the first publication,digest2 has undergone many in- §3.1. cremental improvements. In Appendix B.1, we provide a de- tailed description of the key changes to the digest2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Projekt Brána Do Vesmíru
    Projekt Brána do vesmíru Hvězdárna Valašské Meziříčí, p. o. Krajská hvezdáreň v Žiline Súčasnosť a budúcnosť výskumu medziplanetárnej hmoty RNDr. Peter Vereš, PhD. University of Hawaii / Univerzita Komenského Ako sa objavila MPH ● Pôvodne iba nehybná hviezdna sféra ● Mesiac a Slnko ● Bludné planéty viditeľné voľným okom Starovek => novovek Piazzi ● 1.1.1801 ● Objekt pozorovaný 41 dní ● Stratený...predpoklad, medzi Marsom a Jupiterom ● Laplace – nemožné nájsť ● Gauss (24) vynašiel metódu, vypočítal, Ceres bol nájdený... Halley ● Kométy, odjakživa považované za poslov zlých správ, vysvetlené ako atmosferické javy ● ● ● ● Názov Kometes (dlhovlasá) ● 1577 Brahe = paralaxa, ďalej ako Mesiac ● Edmond Halley si všimol periodicitu kométy 1531, 1607, 1682 = návrat v 1758 Meteory ● Zaznamenané v -1809, - 687 (Lyridy) ● Ernst Chladni 1794 Kniha o pôvode Pallasovho železa ● 1798 Brandes, Benzenberg, paralaxa 400 meteorov, 22 spoločných ● 1803 dážď / Paríž, priznanie kozmického pôvodu ● 1833 USA dážď 20/s, LEO ● 1845/46 rozpad kométy Biela, dažde Andromedíd (72, 85, 93, 99) ● 1861 = Kirkwood, súvis rojov s kométami ● 1866 Schiaparelli: Swift-Tuttle (Perzeidy), Tempel (Leonidy) ● 1899 Adams vypočítal, že Jupiter narušil dráhu kométy, dážď nebol 1833, rytina, Leonidy 1998, foto, Leonidy, AGO Modra MPH a Slnečná sústava ● Slnko ● planéty (8) ● trpasličie planéty /Ceres, Pluto, Haumea, Makemake, Eris ● MPH = asteroidy, kométy, prach, plyn, .... Vznik a vývoj asteroidov ● -4571mil. rokov – vznik Sl. sús. ● Akrécia hmoty – nehomogenity, planetesimály, „viskózna
    [Show full text]
  • Mass of the Kuiper Belt · 9Th Planet PACS 95.10.Ce · 96.12.De · 96.12.Fe · 96.20.-N · 96.30.-T
    Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Mass of the Kuiper Belt E. V. Pitjeva · N. P. Pitjev Received: 13 December 2017 / Accepted: 24 August 2018 The final publication ia available at Springer via http://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-018-9853-5 Abstract The Kuiper belt includes tens of thousands of large bodies and millions of smaller objects. The main part of the belt objects is located in the annular zone between 39.4 au and 47.8 au from the Sun, the boundaries correspond to the average distances for orbital resonances 3:2 and 2:1 with the motion of Neptune. One-dimensional, two-dimensional, and discrete rings to model the total gravitational attraction of numerous belt objects are consid- ered. The discrete rotating model most correctly reflects the real interaction of bodies in the Solar system. The masses of the model rings were determined within EPM2017—the new version of ephemerides of planets and the Moon at IAA RAS—by fitting spacecraft ranging observations. The total mass of the Kuiper belt was calculated as the sum of the masses of the 31 largest trans-neptunian objects directly included in the simultaneous integration and the estimated mass of the model of the discrete ring of TNO. The total mass −2 is (1.97 ± 0.30) · 10 m⊕. The gravitational influence of the Kuiper belt on Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune exceeds at times the attraction of the hypothetical 9th planet with a mass of ∼ 10 m⊕ at the distances assumed for it.
    [Show full text]
  • ISTS-2017-D-074ⅠISSFD-2017-074
    A look at the capture mechanisms of the “Temporarily Captured Asteroids” of the Earth By Hodei URRUTXUA1) and Claudio BOMBARDELLI2) 1)Astronautics Group, University of Southampton, United Kingdom 2)Space Dynamics Group, Technical University of Madrid, Spain (Received April 17th, 2017) Temporarily captured asteroids of the Earth are a newly discovered family of asteroids, which become naturally captured in the vicinity of the Earth for a limited time period. Thus, during the temporary capture these asteroids are in energetically favorable condi- tions, which makes them appealing targets for space missions to asteroids. Despite their potential interest, their capture mechanisms are not yet fully understood, and basic questions remain unanswered regarding the taxonomy of this population. The present work looks at gaining a better understanding of the key features that are relevant to the duration and nature of these asteroids, by analyzing patterns and extracting conclusions from a synthetic population of temporarily captured asteroids. Key Words: Asteroids, temporarily captured asteroids, capture dynamics, asteroid retrieval. Acronyms system. Asteroid 2006 RH120 is so far the only known mem- ber of this population, though statistical studies by Granvik et TCA : Temporarily captured asteroids al.12) support the evidence that such objects are actually com- TCO : Temporarily captured orbiters mon companions of the Earth, and thus it is expected that an TCF : Temporarily captured fly-bys increasing number of them will be found as survey technology improves.13) 1. Introduction During their temporary capture phase these asteroids are technically orbiting the Earth rather than the Sun, since their The origin of planetary satellites in the Solar System has Earth-binding energy is negative.
    [Show full text]
  • Ice& Stone 2020
    Ice & Stone 2020 WEEK 33: AUGUST 9-15 Presented by The Earthrise Institute # 33 Authored by Alan Hale About Ice And Stone 2020 It is my pleasure to welcome all educators, students, topics include: main-belt asteroids, near-Earth asteroids, and anybody else who might be interested, to Ice and “Great Comets,” spacecraft visits (both past and Stone 2020. This is an educational package I have put future), meteorites, and “small bodies” in popular together to cover the so-called “small bodies” of the literature and music. solar system, which in general means asteroids and comets, although this also includes the small moons of Throughout 2020 there will be various comets that are the various planets as well as meteors, meteorites, and visible in our skies and various asteroids passing by Earth interplanetary dust. Although these objects may be -- some of which are already known, some of which “small” compared to the planets of our solar system, will be discovered “in the act” -- and there will also be they are nevertheless of high interest and importance various asteroids of the main asteroid belt that are visible for several reasons, including: as well as “occultations” of stars by various asteroids visible from certain locations on Earth’s surface. Ice a) they are believed to be the “leftovers” from the and Stone 2020 will make note of these occasions and formation of the solar system, so studying them provides appearances as they take place. The “Comet Resource valuable insights into our origins, including Earth and of Center” at the Earthrise web site contains information life on Earth, including ourselves; about the brighter comets that are visible in the sky at any given time and, for those who are interested, I will b) we have learned that this process isn’t over yet, and also occasionally share information about the goings-on that there are still objects out there that can impact in my life as I observe these comets.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Extended Versions of MPC Data Files Based on the MPCORB Format
    Guide to the Extended Versions of MPC Data Files Based on the MPCORB Format Last updated: 2016/04/19 by J.L. Galache Introduction The Minor Planet Center (MPC) has been providing the orbits of minor planets in the form of a file, MPCORB.DAT, since the mid '90s (1990s, not 1890s). Back then there were only a few thousand known asteroids, compared to the several hundred thousand of today, so a flat text file was the appropriate way to circulate these data. It was also a time when most orbit computations were programmed in Fortran, which ingested data no other way. MPCORB.DAT has therefore always been, and continues to be, a fixed-width file (see Table 1 for the current format description1). In fact, all original data files available on the MPC website are flat text files (even the orbits files provided for planetarium-type/sky simulation software packages are simply text files of varying format2). In the early years of the 2010s, possibly due to the rising popularity of the scripting language Python amongst astronomers, and an increased interest from developers wanting to write asteroid-themed tools, requests were received to provide data in other, easier to parse formats, e.g., JSON, CSV, SQL, etc. At the same time, astronomers and developers alike wanted more information than was currently been provided in MPCORB.DAT; information that did exist on the MPC website in other, often hard to find, files. Here was an opportunity to add some new data to existing files, while also making them available in other formats.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Resonant Kuiper Belt Objects
    Resonant Kuiper Belt Objects - a Review Renu Malhotra Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA Email: [email protected] Abstract Our understanding of the history of the solar system has undergone a revolution in recent years, owing to new theoretical insights into the origin of Pluto and the discovery of the Kuiper belt and its rich dynamical structure. The emerging picture of dramatic orbital migration of the planets driven by interaction with the primordial Kuiper belt is thought to have produced the final solar system architecture that we live in today. This paper gives a brief summary of this new view of our solar system's history, and reviews the astronomical evidence in the resonant populations of the Kuiper belt. Introduction Lying at the edge of the visible solar system, observational confirmation of the existence of the Kuiper belt came approximately a quarter-century ago with the discovery of the distant minor planet (15760) Albion (formerly 1992 QB1, Jewitt & Luu 1993). With the clarity of hindsight, we now recognize that Pluto was the first discovered member of the Kuiper belt. The current census of the Kuiper belt includes more than 2000 minor planets at heliocentric distances between ~30 au and ~50 au. Their orbital distribution reveals a rich dynamical structure shaped by the gravitational perturbations of the giant planets, particularly Neptune. Theoretical analysis of these structures has revealed a remarkable dynamic history of the solar system. The story is as follows (see Fernandez & Ip 1984, Malhotra 1993, Malhotra 1995, Fernandez & Ip 1996, and many subsequent works).
    [Show full text]
  • The Minor Planets
    The Minor Planets Swinburne Astronomy Online 3D PDF c SAO 2012 The Minor Planets c Swinburne Astronomy Online 2012 1 Description 1.1 Minor planets Our view of the Solar System has changed dramatically over the past 15 years with the discovery of new classes of small bodies. Mi- nor planets are another name for asteroids, or celestial bodies that orbit the Sun that are not otherwise classed as planets or comets. Generally, minor planets are relatively small rocky bodies, while comets are icy bodies that become active when their orbits carry them close to the Sun. (An \active" comet exhibits a large coma and a long tail.) The minor planets can be classified by their orbital characteristics. In this 3D PDF, we have included 5 classes of minor planets: (1) the Near Earth Asteroids (NEAs), (2) the main belt asteroids, (3) the Trojan asteroids of Jupiter, (4) the Centaurs, and (5) the Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs). The dataset used comes from the Minor Planets Centre. As of 19 November 2012, there were 9,346 NEAs (comprising 732 Atens, 4686 Apollos and 3928 Amors); 581,613 main belt asteroids; 5,407 jovian Trojans; 330 Centaurs; and 1,150 TNOs. (Note than in this 3D PDF, we have only included 11,678 main belt asteroids.) • The Near Earth Asteroids have perihelion distances of less than 1.3 AU, and include the following sub-classes: { Atens have aphelion distances greater than 0.983 AU, and semi-major axes less than 1 AU { Apollos have perihelion distances less than 1.017 AU, and semi-major axes greater than 1 AU { Amors have perihelion distances between 1.017 and 1.3 AU and semi-major axes greater than 1 AU • The main belt asteroids reside between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter, with most of the asteroids orbiting between about 2.1 AU and 3.3 AU.
    [Show full text]
  • Col-OSSOS: Colors of the Interstellar Planetesimal 1I/Oumuamua
    DRAFT VERSION DECEMBER 7, 2017 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX61 COL-OSSOS: COLORS OF THE INTERSTELLAR PLANETESIMAL 1I/‘OUMUAMUA MICHELE T. BANNISTER,1 MEGAN E. SCHWAMB,2 WESLEY C. FRASER,1 MICHAEL MARSSET,1 ALAN FITZSIMMONS,1 SUSAN D. BENECCHI,3 PEDRO LACERDA,1 ROSEMARY E. PIKE,4 J. J. KAVELAARS,5, 6 ADAM B. SMITH,2 SUNNY O. STEWART,2 SHIANG-YU WANG,7 AND MATTHEW J. LEHNER7, 8, 9 1Astrophysics Research Centre, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, United Kingdom 2Gemini Observatory, Northern Operations Center, 670 North A’ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720, USA 3Planetary Science Institute, 1700 East Fort Lowell, Suite 106, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA 4Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica; 11F AS/NTU, National Taiwan University, 1 Roosevelt Rd., Sec. 4, Taipei 10617, Taiwan 5Herzberg Astronomy and Astrophysics Research Centre, National Research Council of Canada, 5071 West Saanich Rd, Victoria, British Columbia V9E 2E7, Canada 6Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Elliott Building, 3800 Finnerty Rd, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada 7Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica; 11F of AS/NTU Astronomy-Mathematics Building, Nr. 1 Roosevelt Rd., Sec. 4, Taipei 10617, Taiwan 8Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, 209 S. 33rd St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA 9Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA (Received 2017 November 16; Revised 2017 December 4; Accepted 2017 December 6) Submitted to ApJL ABSTRACT The recent discovery by Pan-STARRS1 of 1I/2017 U1 (‘Oumuamua), on an unbound and hyperbolic orbit, offers a rare oppor- tunity to explore the planetary formation processes of other stars, and the effect of the interstellar environment on a planetesimal surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting the Yarkovsky Effect Among Near-Earth Asteroids From
    Detecting the Yarkovsky effect among near-Earth asteroids from astrometric data Alessio Del Vignaa,b, Laura Faggiolid, Andrea Milania, Federica Spotoc, Davide Farnocchiae, Benoit Carryf aDipartimento di Matematica, Universit`adi Pisa, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 5, Pisa, Italy bSpace Dynamics Services s.r.l., via Mario Giuntini, Navacchio di Cascina, Pisa, Italy cIMCCE, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, Sorbonne Universits, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, Univ. Lille, 77 av. Denfert-Rochereau F-75014 Paris, France dESA SSA-NEO Coordination Centre, Largo Galileo Galilei, 1, 00044 Frascati (RM), Italy eJet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, 91109 CA, USA fUniversit´eCˆote d’Azur, Observatoire de la Cˆote d’Azur, CNRS, Laboratoire Lagrange, Boulevard de l’Observatoire, Nice, France Abstract We present an updated set of near-Earth asteroids with a Yarkovsky-related semi- major axis drift detected from the orbital fit to the astrometry. We find 87 reliable detections after filtering for the signal-to-noise ratio of the Yarkovsky drift esti- mate and making sure the estimate is compatible with the physical properties of the analyzed object. Furthermore, we find a list of 24 marginally significant detec- tions, for which future astrometry could result in a Yarkovsky detection. A further outcome of the filtering procedure is a list of detections that we consider spurious because unrealistic or not explicable with the Yarkovsky effect. Among the smallest asteroids of our sample, we determined four detections of solar radiation pressure, in addition to the Yarkovsky effect. As the data volume increases in the near fu- ture, our goal is to develop methods to generate very long lists of asteroids with reliably detected Yarkovsky effect, with limited amounts of case by case specific adjustments.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Pluto Is Not a Planet Anymore Or How Astronomical Objects Get Named
    3 Why Pluto Is Not a Planet Anymore or How Astronomical Objects Get Named Sethanne Howard USNO retired Abstract Everywhere I go people ask me why Pluto was kicked out of the Solar System. Poor Pluto, 76 years a planet and then summarily dismissed. The answer is not too complicated. It starts with the question how are astronomical objects named or classified; asks who is responsible for this; and ends with international treaties. Ultimately we learn that it makes sense to demote Pluto. Catalogs and Names WHO IS RESPONSIBLE for naming and classifying astronomical objects? The answer varies slightly with the object, and history plays an important part. Let us start with the stars. Most of the bright stars visible to the naked eye were named centuries ago. They generally have kept their old- fashioned names. Betelgeuse is just such an example. It is the eighth brightest star in the northern sky. The star’s name is thought to be derived ,”Yad al-Jauzā' meaning “the Hand of al-Jauzā يد الجوزاء from the Arabic i.e., Orion, with mistransliteration into Medieval Latin leading to the first character y being misread as a b. Betelgeuse is its historical name. The star is also known by its Bayer designation − ∝ Orionis. A Bayeri designation is a stellar designation in which a specific star is identified by a Greek letter followed by the genitive form of its parent constellation’s Latin name. The original list of Bayer designations contained 1,564 stars. The Bayer designation typically assigns the letter alpha to the brightest star in the constellation and moves through the Greek alphabet, with each letter representing the next fainter star.
    [Show full text]
  • Asteroid 1566 Icarus's Size, Shape, Orbit, and Yarkovsky Drift From
    The Astronomical Journal, 153:108 (16pp), 2017 March https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/153/3/108 © 2017. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Asteroid 1566 Icarus’sSize, Shape, Orbit, and Yarkovsky Drift from Radar Observations Adam H. Greenberg1, Jean-Luc Margot1, Ashok K. Verma1, Patrick A. Taylor2, Shantanu P. Naidu3, Marina. Brozovic3, and Lance A. M. Benner3 1 University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA 2 Arecibo Observatory, HC3 Box 53995, Arecibo, PR 00612, USA 3 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA Received 2016 December 12; revised 2017 January 11; accepted 2017 January 11; published 2017 February 15 Abstract Near-Earth asteroid (NEA) 1566 Icarus (a = 1.08 au, e=0.83, i = 22.8 ) made a close approach to Earth in 2015 June at 22 lunar distances (LD). Its detection during the 1968 approach (16 LD) was the first in the history of asteroid radar astronomy. A subsequent approach in 1996 (40 LD) did not yield radar images. We describe analyses of our 2015 radar observations of Icarus obtained at the Arecibo Observatory and the DSS-14 antenna at Goldstone. These data show that the asteroid is a moderately flattened spheroid with an equivalent diameter of 1.44 km with 18% uncertainties, resolving long-standing questions about the asteroid size. We also solve for Icarus’s spin-axis orientation (l ==-270 10 ,b 81 10), which is not consistent with the estimates based on the 1968 light-curve observations. Icarus has a strongly specular scattering behavior, among the highest ever measured in asteroid radar observations, and a radar albedo of ∼2%, among the lowest ever measured in asteroid radar observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Pluto and Its Cohorts, Which Is Not Ger Passing by and Falling in Love So Much When Compared to the with Her
    INTERNATIONAL SPACE SCIENCE INSTITUTE SPATIUM Published by the Association Pro ISSI No. 33, March 2014 141348_Spatium_33_(001_016).indd 1 19.03.14 13:47 Editorial A sunny spring day. A green On 20 March 2013, Dr. Hermann meadow on the gentle slopes of Boehnhardt reported on the pre- Impressum Mount Etna and a handsome sent state of our knowledge of woman gathering flowers. A stran- Pluto and its cohorts, which is not ger passing by and falling in love so much when compared to the with her. planets in our cosmic neighbour- hood, yet impressively much in SPATIUM Next time, when she is picking view of their modest size and their Published by the flowers again, the foreigner returns gargantuan distance. In fact, ob- Association Pro ISSI on four black horses. Now, he, serving dwarf planet Pluto poses Pluto, the Roman god of the un- similar challenges to watching an derworld, carries off Proserpina to astronaut’s face on the Moon. marry her and live together in the shadowland. The heartbroken We thank Dr. Boehnhardt for his Association Pro ISSI mother Ceres insists on her return; kind permission to publishing Hallerstrasse 6, CH-3012 Bern she compromises with Pluto allow- herewith a summary of his fasci- Phone +41 (0)31 631 48 96 ing Proserpina to living under the nating talk for our Pro ISSI see light of the Sun during six months association. www.issibern.ch/pro-issi.html of a year, called summer from now for the whole Spatium series on, when the flowers bloom on the Hansjörg Schlaepfer slopes of Mount Etna, while hav- Brissago, March 2014 President ing to stay in the twilight of the Prof.
    [Show full text]