DOCSLIB.ORG

Sierra Nevada Bighorns Vs. Mountain Lions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sierra Nevada Bighorns Vs. Mountain Lions Sierra Nevada Bighorns vs. Mountain Lions Adapted from: “Counting Sheep: Bighorn NGSS Standards: Sheep and Mountain Lions in the • 5-ESS3-1 Obtain and combine American West” by Elizabeth Clark information about ways individual Department of Biology, Washington communities use science ideas to University in St. Louis protect Earth’s resources (bighorn or mountain lions in this case) and environment Objectives: • MS-LS2-1 Analyze and interpret Students analyze a less traditional data to provide evidence for the endangered species conflict: a legally effects of resource availability on protected but common predator, the organisms and populations of mountain lion, is preying on and driving organisms in an ecosystem. towards extinction an endangered • HS-LS2-1 Use mathematical and/or herbivore, the Sierra Nevada bighorn computational representations to sheep. Biologists concerned with the support explanations of factors preservation of bighorn sheep want to that affect carrying capacity of reduce the lions (cull) to prevent further ecosystems at different scales. harm to the sheep, while mountain lion activists oppose killing of lions for any Common Core State Standards: reason. Students examine the two A variety of Speaking & Listening standards perspectives, debate, and finally vote as a would fit in here, for example: mock California State Senate on whether • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.11-12.1.B to allow culling of lions that kill bighorns. Work with peers to promote civil, democratic discussions and Grade level: Suggested 5th-12th decision-making, set clear goals Duration: 2-3 class sessions and deadlines, and establish Group Size: Whole class/ small individual roles as needed. group • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.11-12.1.C Setting: indoors Propel conversations by posing Materials: and responding to questions that • Cougars Wiping Out Sierra probe reasoning and evidence; Bighorn Sheep, Scientists Say ensure a hearing for a full range article of positions on a topic or issue; • Pre-Case Discussion clarify, verify, or challenge ideas Questions worksheet and conclusions; and promote • History of Sierra Nevada divergent and creative Bighorn Sheep Recovery perspectives. • Voting Ballot • Optional: The Cost of the Bighorn Comeback news article www.wildsheepfoundation.org 412 Pronghorn Trail – Bozeman, MT Background: human safety issues as the human Genetically distinct from all other population of the state continued to grow. wild sheep on the continent, Sierra The passage of the California Wildlife bighorn form an irreplaceable part of the Protection Act of 1990 (Proposition 117) landscape in which they make their by California voters established that homes. Beyond the ecological mountain lions are a "specially protected consequences of extinction, the loss of the mammal" in California and cannot be Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep would have killed. repercussions across centuries of natural With the mountain lion being the and human history, leaving this great main predator of bighorn sheep, a conflict mountain range impoverished forever. arose in California as biologists who There is a lack of historical wished to increase herds of the information needed to pinpoint the exact endangered Sierra Nevada Bighorn were chain of events that led this species to the unable to cull (reduce the population of brink of extinction, but the earliest mountain lions) to help the small number information on disease problems dates of bighorn grow in population. back to the 1870s after the introduction of extensive domestic sheep grazing Focus: throughout the Sierra Nevada. The primary focus of this case is to teach Unregulated hunting, especially market students to formulate an opinion on an hunting near mining towns may have also issue by taking ethics, science, and politics played a role. More recently, an episode of into consideration. Students are often particularly high mountain lion predation accustomed to hearing about conflicts appears to have played a role. between human and environmental Restoration efforts during 1979-88 interests, but this case introduces a new were successful in re-establishing kind of conflict. Here the conflict is populations in three areas, but between an endangered species (Sierra governmental regulatory constraints Nevada bighorn sheep), and its ultimately hindered continuing recovery charismatic predator (the mountain lion). of these sheep relative to management of Students should be forced to consider the predation (from mountain lions) and bases for their positions on the threats from domestic sheep grazing very conservation of endangered species and close to Sierra bighorn. It was deficiencies the ethics of hunting, and use this when in governmental regulatory mechanisms coming to a resolution on the issue. that led to the seeking of federal endangered status in 1999. The total population of Sierra bighorn has shown a Procedures: remarkable recovery since its low ebb of 1) Inform students that they will become about 100 animals in 1995 to more than members of the California State Senate 600 in 2014. and they are in charge of debating and Historically, mountain lions were then voting on a bill (law). Explain that heavily persecuted in California. Classified this is a very heated and debated issue in as a bounty predator from 1907 to 1963, California. You may even pretend to go 12,462 mountain lions were killed in back in time to 1998 during the most California during this bounty process, heated discussions in California (and which was enacted to reduce the number when the news article was written). of livestock and pets they killed, as well as www.wildsheepfoundation.org 412 Pronghorn Trail – Bozeman, MT 2) Before giving them any background on currently has an initial opinion, it is the situation, it is suggested students fill important to listen to every person’s out the two pre-case discussion questions. perspective and voice to help them make a 3) Provide background on the Sierra final vote at the end of the debate. Let the Nevada bighorn. This could be through debate begin. Perhaps encourage students video means (one good 9-minute video is to create a Pro/Con chart during debate the YouTube video Yosemite Nature Notes: discussions. Teacher may also do this on Bighorn Sheep – Episode 27) or reading the board. History of Sierra Nevada Bighorn Recovery. The article only goes up until the issue 7) After the debate, each student with mountain lions preventing the (Senator) would fill out an official voting comeback. ballot. Explain that during official votes, our elected officials vote is not 4) Further introduce and focus on the confidential, but that the public is allowed to know how each person voted. This issue at that time, that the Sierra Nevada bighorn population, even with current often helps determine if the person is re- efforts to reestablish them, were in elected based upon them voting as the jeopardy. One of the main issues seen by majority of their constituents wish them scientists was the predation due to to vote based upon emails, phone calls, mountain lions. Have a class discussion of etc. they receive on issues. Perhaps have a general ideas of both sides: reduce tally chart on the board with each option mountain lions to help bighorns, or and as the teacher reads the Senator’s continue to allow populations of mountain name from the voting slip, add a tally into lions to stay constant even though it may the appropriate column, eventually impact bighorns. Begin to allow students leading to a visual of how many voted for each side and the total decision based to see where their opinion is on the mater. Read the article from the time called upon majority. Cougars Wiping Out Sierra Bighorn Sheep, Scientists Say to allow students more time 8) Return to the pre-case discussion to gather information to form an opinion. questions originally answered. Re-address these at the end of the case to bring closure to the case by reminding students 5) Debate groups form based upon opinions. Allow time for each side to get of their initial responses and allowing together to form strong arguments to back them time to analyze why any opinions up their opinion. Write these down to be have changed. This could be a good time used during the “formal” Senate hearing. for some sort of assessment, such as a reflection on why many issues in our 6) Officially introduce that the class is now society are not easily fixed and how there the California State Senate and they have a are many sides to each situation. heavy task of officially deciding on the 9) Perhaps explain where the issue is issue. Remind them, that as elected today. You can find the rest of article officials, they all have a responsibility of History of Sierra Nevada Bighorn Recovery put their own opinions aside when voting for a discussion after the debate/lesson at on the law, and that this debate is to try to https://www.nps.gov/yose/learn/nature bring out ALL the issues and ALL the /sheep-history.htm and perhaps reveal possible facts to make an informed the decision that “The California State decision. That although each student Legislature, reacting to media attention www.wildsheepfoundation.org 412 Pronghorn Trail – Bozeman, MT over the fate of Sierra bighorn, in a rare Videos: almost-unanimous vote, approved a https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCf4 change in the 1990 initiative to allow 7SrgDss&t=127s (Sierra Nevada Bighorn control of mountain lions to protect history, found on YouTube: Yosemite bighorn sheep in California. In another Nature Notes: Bighorn Sheep -Episode 27) unprecedented action, that legislature also initiated financial support for a Can rent a 60-minute film on the issue at state-led recovery program for these https://www.greenplanetfilms.org/produ sheep—a program that continues ct/counting-sheep-restoring-the-sierra- today. Such action by the state nevada-bighorn/ for $2.99 legislature for an endangered species was—and remains—unprecedented.” Additionally, an article written in 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVj1 does a good job of explaining the outcome 2ZtOFUk (News Cast of Mountain Lions in and how this has transferred to another Catalina Mountains of Arizona with range of sheep in Arizona at the Santa similar issue) Catalina mountains.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ansel Adams by Ross Loeser February 2010
    Ansel Adams By Ross Loeser February 2010 Ansel Adams is one of the most fascinating people of the 20th Century… a photography pioneer whose art captured the imagination of millions of ordinary people. Most of the information in this paper is from his autobiography – written in the last five years of his life. I found the book a joy to read. Adams (1902-1984) was born in San Francisco and lived most of his life in that area. For his last 22 years he lived in Carmel Highlands. Some key formative events in his early life were: In 1916, when he was 14, he influenced his family to go on vacation in Yosemite after reading the book, In the Heart of the Sierras by J.M. Hutchens. During that trip, he received his first camera – a Kodak Box Brownie. He returned to Yosemite every year of his life thereafter.1 He was hired as a “darkroom monkey” by a neighbor who operated a photo finishing business in 1917, which enabled him to learn about making photographic prints. As he grew up, one major focus was music – the piano. “By 1923 I was a budding professional pianist…”2 On a bright spring Yosemite day in 1927, Adams made a photograph that was to “change my understanding of the medium.” The picture was of Half Dome, and titled “Monolith, The Face of Half Dome.” The full story is included later in this paper, but, in a nutshell, he captured how he felt about the scene, not how it actually appeared (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover California State Parks in the Monterey Area
    Crashing waves, redwoods and historic sites Discover California State Parks in the Monterey Area Some of the most beautiful sights in California can be found in Monterey area California State Parks. Rocky cliffs, crashing waves, redwood trees, and historic sites are within an easy drive of each other. "When you look at the diversity of state parks within the Monterey District area, you begin to realize that there is something for everyone - recreational activities, scenic beauty, natural and cultural history sites, and educational programs,” said Dave Schaechtele, State Parks Monterey District Public Information Officer. “There are great places to have fun with families and friends, and peaceful and inspirational settings that are sure to bring out the poet, writer, photographer, or artist in you. Some people return to their favorite state parks, year-after-year, while others venture out and discover some new and wonderful places that are then added to their 'favorites' list." State Parks in the area include: Limekiln State Park, 54 miles south of Carmel off Highway One and two miles south of the town of Lucia, features vistas of the Big Sur coast, redwoods, and the remains of historic limekilns. The Rockland Lime and Lumber Company built these rock and steel furnaces in 1887 to cook the limestone mined from the canyon walls. The 711-acre park allows visitors an opportunity to enjoy the atmosphere of Big Sur’s southern coast. The park has the only safe access to the shoreline along this section of cast. For reservations at the park’s 36 campsites, call ReserveAmerica at (800) 444- PARK (7275).
    [Show full text]
  • References and Appendices
    References Ainley, D.G., S.G. Allen, and L.B. Spear. 1995. Off- Arnold, R.A. 1983. Ecological studies on six endan- shore occurrence patterns of marbled murrelets gered butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): in central California. In: C.J. Ralph, G.L. Hunt island biogeography, patch dynamics, and the Jr., M.G. Raphael, and J.F. Piatt, technical edi- design of habitat preserves. University of Cali- tors. Ecology and Conservation of the Marbled fornia Publications in Entomology 99: 1–161. Murrelet. USDA Forest Service, General Techni- Atwood, J.L. 1993. California gnatcatchers and coastal cal Report PSW-152; 361–369. sage scrub: the biological basis for endangered Allen, C.R., R.S. Lutz, S. Demairais. 1995. Red im- species listing. In: J.E. Keeley, editor. Interface ported fire ant impacts on Northern Bobwhite between ecology and land development in Cali- populations. Ecological Applications 5: 632-638. fornia. Southern California Academy of Sciences, Allen, E.B., P.E. Padgett, A. Bytnerowicz, and R.A. Los Angeles; 149–169. Minnich. 1999. Nitrogen deposition effects on Atwood, J.L., P. Bloom, D. Murphy, R. Fisher, T. Scott, coastal sage vegetation of southern California. In T. Smith, R. Wills, P. Zedler. 1996. Principles of A. Bytnerowicz, M.J. Arbaugh, and S. Schilling, reserve design and species conservation for the tech. coords. Proceedings of the international sym- southern Orange County NCCP (Draft of Oc- posium on air pollution and climate change effects tober 21, 1996). Unpublished manuscript. on forest ecosystems, February 5–9, 1996, River- Austin, M. 1903. The Land of Little Rain. University side, CA.
    [Show full text]
  • Biography of a "Feathered Pig": the California Condor Conservation
    Journal of the History of Biology 37: 557–583, 2004. 557 Ó 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Biography of a ‘‘Feathered Pig’’: The California Condor Conservation Controversy PETER S. ALAGONA Department of History Institute of the Environment University of California, Los Angeles USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. In the early 20th century, after hundreds of years of gradual decline, the California condor emerged as an object of intensive scientific study, an important conservation target, and a cultural icon of the American wilderness preservation movement. Early condor researchers generally believed that the species’ survival de- pended upon the preservation of its wilderness habitat. However, beginning in the 1970s, a new generation of scientists argued that no amount of wilderness could prevent the condor’s decline and that only intensive scientific management - including captive breeding - could save the species from certain extinction. A bitter and highly politicized battle soon developed over how to best preserve the condor. For 5 years the condor was extinct in the wild; however, by the time that officials released the first captive-bred birds the condor recovery program had garnered widespread public support, even among its former critics. Today, condor advocates from the scientific and activist communities work together to manage the species and protect its habitat. The condor’s story illus- trates some of the tensions, problems, and successes that have accompanied the rise of conservation biology as a scientific field and environmental movement in the United States. Keywords: California condor, conservation biology, endangered species, wildlife man- agement Introduction On Easter Sunday 1987, a team of scientists, conservationists, and government officials finally caught up with Adult Condor-9, a 7-year old male California condor (Gymnogyps californianus) that had previously demonstrated an uncanny ability to evade his would-be captors (Fig- ure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • California Condor (Gymnogyps Californianus) 5-Year Review
    California Condor (Gymnogyps californianus) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Southwest Region June 2013 Acknowledgement: The Service gratefully acknowledges the commitment and efforts of the California Condor Recovery Program partners for their many on-going contributions towards condor recovery. Our partners were instrumental both in ensuring that we used the best available science to craft our analyses and recommendations in this 5-year review and in providing individual feedback that was used to refine this document. Photo Credit: Unless otherwise indicated, all photos, charts, and graphs are products of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Page | 2 5-YEAR REVIEW California condor (Gymnogyps californianus) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5- year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife, changed in status from endangered to threatened, or changed in status from threatened to endangered. Our original listing as endangered or threatened is based on the species’ status considering the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act. These same five factors are considered in any subsequent reclassification or delisting decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Leptosomiformes ~ Trogoniformes ~ Bucerotiformes ~ Piciformes
    Birds of the World part 6 Afroaves The core landbirds originating in Africa TELLURAVES: AFROAVES – core landbirds originating in Africa (8 orders) • ORDER ACCIPITRIFORMES – hawks and allies (4 families, 265 species) – Family Cathartidae – New World vultures (7 species) – Family Sagittariidae – secretarybird (1 species) – Family Pandionidae – ospreys (2 species) – Family Accipitridae – kites, hawks, and eagles (255 species) • ORDER STRIGIFORMES – owls (2 families, 241 species) – Family Tytonidae – barn owls (19 species) – Family Strigidae – owls (222 species) • ORDER COLIIFORMES (1 family, 6 species) – Family Coliidae – mousebirds (6 species) • ORDER LEPTOSOMIFORMES (1 family, 1 species) – Family Leptosomidae – cuckoo-roller (1 species) • ORDER TROGONIFORMES (1 family, 43 species) – Family Trogonidae – trogons (43 species) • ORDER BUCEROTIFORMES – hornbills and hoopoes (4 families, 74 species) – Family Upupidae – hoopoes (4 species) – Family Phoeniculidae – wood hoopoes (9 species) – Family Bucorvidae – ground hornbills (2 species) – Family Bucerotidae – hornbills (59 species) • ORDER PICIFORMES – woodpeckers and allies (9 families, 443 species) – Family Galbulidae – jacamars (18 species) – Family Bucconidae – puffbirds (37 species) – Family Capitonidae – New World barbets (15 species) – Family Semnornithidae – toucan barbets (2 species) – Family Ramphastidae – toucans (46 species) – Family Megalaimidae – Asian barbets (32 species) – Family Lybiidae – African barbets (42 species) – Family Indicatoridae – honeyguides (17 species) – Family
    [Show full text]
  • Julia Pfeiffer Burns
    Our Mission The mission of California State Parks is Julia Pfeiffer to provide for the health, inspiration and education of the people of California by helping to preserve the state’s extraordinary biological Visitors from around the Burns diversity, protecting its most valued natural and cultural resources, and creating opportunities world revere the natural for high-quality outdoor recreation. State Park beauty of the park’s rugged coastline, panoramic views, California State Parks supports equal access. crashing surf and Prior to arrival, visitors with disabilities who need assistance should contact the Big Sur sparkling waters. Station at (831) 649-2836. This publication is available in alternate formats by contacting: CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 For information call: (800) 777-0369. (916) 653-6995, outside the U.S. 711, TTY relay service www.parks.ca.gov Discover the many states of California.™ SaveTheRedwoods.org/csp Julia Pfeiffer Burns State Park 11 miles south of Big Sur on Highway 1 Big Sur, CA 93920 (831) 649-2836 www.parks.ca.gov/jpb Julia Pfeiffer Burns photo courtesy of Big Sur Historical Society © 2011 California State Parks J ulia Pfeiffer Burns State Park including the McWay and Partington dropping nearly vertically to shore offers a dramatic meeting families. Homesteaders were provide habitat for many sensitive aquatic of land and sea—attracting largely self-suffcient—making and terrestrial species. visitors, writers, artists and a living as loggers, tanoak Three perennial creeks fow through the photographers from around harvesters or ranchers by using park; Anderson, Partington and McWay the world.
    [Show full text]
  • California Partners in Flight the USDA Forest Service Klamath Bird Observatory and PRBO Conservation Science
    The Coniferous Forest Bird Conservation Plan A Strategy for Protecting and Managing Coniferous Forest Habitats and Associated Birds in California Version 1.1 March 2002 A project of California Partners in Flight The USDA Forest Service Klamath Bird Observatory and PRBO Conservation Science Conservation Plan Lead Authors: John C. Robinson, USDA Forest Service John Alexander, Klamath Bird Observatory Conservation Plan Supporting Authors, PRBO Conservation Science: Sue Abbott Diana Humple Grant Ballard Melissa Pitkin Dan Barton Sandy Scoggin Gregg Elliott Diana Stralberg Sacha Heath Focal Species Account Authors: Black-backed Woodpecker – Kerry Farris Black-throated Gray Warbler – Tina Mark, USDA Forest Service Brown Creeper – Danielle LeFer, San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory Dark-eyed Junco – Jim DeStaebler, PRBO Conservation Science Flammulated Owl – Susan Yasuda, USDA Forest Service Fox Sparrow – Anne King, EDAW, Inc. Golden-crowned Kinglet – John C. Robinson, USDA Forest Service MacGillivray's Warbler – Chris Otahal, USDA Forest Service Olive-sided Flycatcher – Paul Brandy, Endangered Species Recovery Program Pileated Woodpecker – John C. Robinson, USDA Forest Service Red-breasted Nuthatch – Tina Mark and John C. Robinson, USDA Forest Service Vaux's Swift – John Sterling, Jones and Stokes Associates Western Tanager – Cory Davis, USDA Forest Service Financial Contributors: USDA Forest Service Packard Foundation National Fish and Wildlife Foundation PRBO Conservation Science Klamath Bird Observatory Acknowledgements: California Partners in Flight wishes to thank everyone who helped write, promote, and produce this document. Special thanks to Laurie Fenwood, Geoffrey Geupel, Aaron Holmes, Genny Wilson, Ryan Burnett, and Doug Wallace, and to Sophie Webb for her cover illustration. Recommended Citation: CalPIF (California Partners in Flight). 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Kings Canyon and Sequoia National Parks
    S o k u To Bishop ee t Piute Pass Cr h F 11423ft p o o 3482m r h k s S i o B u B i th G s h L o A p Pavilion Dome Mount C F 11846ft IE Goethe C or r R e k S 3611m I 13264ft a D VID e n 4024m k E J Lake oa q Sabrina u McClure Meadow k r i n 9600ft o F 2926m e l d R d Mount Henry i i Mount v 12196ft e Darwin M 3717m r The Hermit 13830ft South L 12360ft 4215m E 3767m Lake Big Pine C G 3985ft DINKEY O O 1215m O P D Hell for Sure Pass E w o N D Mount V s 11297ft A O e t T R McGee n L LAKES 3443m D U s E 12969ft T 3953m I O C C o A N r N Mount Powell WILDERNESS r D B a Y A JOHN l 13361ft I O S V I R N N 4072m Bi Bishop Pass g P k i ine Cree v I D e 11972ft r E 3649m C Mount Goddard L r E MUIR e 13568ft Muir Pass e C DUSY North Palisade k 4136m 11955ft O BASIN 3644m N 14242ft Black Giant T E 4341m 13330ft COURTRIGHT JOHN MUIR P Le Conte A WILDERNESS 4063m RESERVOIR L I Canyon S B Charybdis A 395 8720ft i D rc 13091ft E Middle Palisade h 2658m Mount Reinstein 14040ft 3990m C r WILDERNESS CR Cre e 12604ft A ek v ES 4279m i Blackcap 3842m N T R Mountain Y O an INYO d s E 11559ft P N N a g c r i 3523m C ui T f n M rail i i H c John K A e isad Creek C N Pal r W T e E s H G D t o D I T d E T E d V r WISHON G a a IL O r O S i d l RESERVOIR R C Mather Pass Split Mountain G R W Finger Pe ak A Amphitheater 14058ft E 12100ft G 12404ft S Lake 4285m 3688m E 3781m D N U IV P S I C P D E r E e R e k B C A SIERRA NATIONAL FOREST E art Taboose r S id G g k e I N Pass r k Tunemah Peak V D o e I 11894ft 11400ft F e A R r C 3625m ree 3475m C k L W n L k O Striped
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 National Bird List
    2020 NATIONAL BIRD LIST See General Rules, Eye Protection & other Policies on www.soinc.org as they apply to every event. Kingdom – ANIMALIA Great Blue Heron Ardea herodias ORDER: Charadriiformes Phylum – CHORDATA Snowy Egret Egretta thula Lapwings and Plovers (Charadriidae) Green Heron American Golden-Plover Subphylum – VERTEBRATA Black-crowned Night-heron Killdeer Charadrius vociferus Class - AVES Ibises and Spoonbills Oystercatchers (Haematopodidae) Family Group (Family Name) (Threskiornithidae) American Oystercatcher Common Name [Scientifc name Roseate Spoonbill Platalea ajaja Stilts and Avocets (Recurvirostridae) is in italics] Black-necked Stilt ORDER: Anseriformes ORDER: Suliformes American Avocet Recurvirostra Ducks, Geese, and Swans (Anatidae) Cormorants (Phalacrocoracidae) americana Black-bellied Whistling-duck Double-crested Cormorant Sandpipers, Phalaropes, and Allies Snow Goose Phalacrocorax auritus (Scolopacidae) Canada Goose Branta canadensis Darters (Anhingidae) Spotted Sandpiper Trumpeter Swan Anhinga Anhinga anhinga Ruddy Turnstone Wood Duck Aix sponsa Frigatebirds (Fregatidae) Dunlin Calidris alpina Mallard Anas platyrhynchos Magnifcent Frigatebird Wilson’s Snipe Northern Shoveler American Woodcock Scolopax minor Green-winged Teal ORDER: Ciconiiformes Gulls, Terns, and Skimmers (Laridae) Canvasback Deep-water Waders (Ciconiidae) Laughing Gull Hooded Merganser Wood Stork Ring-billed Gull Herring Gull Larus argentatus ORDER: Galliformes ORDER: Falconiformes Least Tern Sternula antillarum Partridges, Grouse, Turkeys, and
    [Show full text]
  • AOU and Audubon Report: Status of the California Condor and Efforts To
    Status of the California Condor and Efforts to Achieve its Recovery Prepared by the AOU Committee on Conservation, California Condor Blue Ribbon Panel, A Joint Initiative of The American Ornithologists’ Union and Audubon California Jeffrey R. Walters, Scott R. Derrickson, D. Michael Fry, Susan M. Haig, John M. Marzluff, Joseph M. Wunderle, Jr. August 2008 Status of the California Condor and Efforts to Achieve its Recovery August 2008 Prepared by the AOU Committee on Conservation, California Condor Blue Ribbon Panel, A Joint Initiative of The American Ornithologists’ Union and Audubon California Panel Members: Jeffrey R. Walters (chairman), Virginia Tech University Scott R. Derrickson, Smithsonian Institution, National Zoological Park D. Michael Fry, American Bird Conservancy Susan M. Haig, USGS Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center John M. Marzluff, University of Washington Joseph M. Wunderle, Jr., International Institute of Tropical Forestry, USDA Forest Service Assisted by: Brock B. Bernstein Karen L. Velas, Audubon California This report was supported with funding from the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, the Morgan Family Foundation, and other private donors. © Copyright 2008 The American Ornithologists’ Union and Audubon California INTRODUCTION The California Condor (Gymnogyps californianus) has long been symbolic of avian conservation in the United States. Its large size, inquisitiveness and association with remote places make it highly charismatic, and its decline to the brink of extinction has aroused a continuing public interest in its plight. By 1982 only 22 condors remained, and the last wild bird was trapped and brought into captivity in 1987, rendering the species extinct in the wild (Snyder and Snyder 2000). At that time, some questioned whether viable populations could ever exist again in the natural environment, and whether limited conservation funds should be expended on what they viewed as a hopeless cause (Pitelka 1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Eleventh Report of the California Bird Records Committee
    WESTERN BIRDS Volume 21, Number 4, 1990 ELEVENTH REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA BIRD RECORDS COMMITTEE LOUIS R. BEVIER, P.O. Box 665, Storrs, Connecticut 06268 This reportcontains 257 recordsreviewed by the CaliforniaBird Records Committee(hereafter the Committee)and is the largestof the eleven reportscompiled thus far. A total of 81 speciesis coveredas follows:234 recordsof 73 speciesaccepted and 23 recordsof 20 speciesnot accepted. Thus, 91% of the reportsare accepted.The rate of acceptancein the last four Committeereports has varied from 88% to 92%, whereasin previous reportsthe rate has been as low as 74% and as high as 97%. The records dealt with here span 90 yearsfrom 1896 to 1986 and includereports for almostevery year from 1960 onward.Over half of the records,however, are from the lasttwo yearsof that period(99 for 1985 and 40 for 1986). Half of the countiesin Californiaare representedin thisreport, including all but two of the coastalcounties. Of these,San Diego and San Francisco countieshave 40 and 37 acceptedrecords, respectively; these numbers are slightlyover twice the next highesttotals of 17 and 16 for Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispocounties, respectively. The largestnumber of rarities per land area goes to SoutheastFarallon Island, which has 15% of the acceptedrecords (a total of 35) and only one ten-thousandthof one percent of California'stotal land area. The qualityand consistencyof the reports from there has recentlybeen among the highestthat the Committee reviews.Special recognition for thisgoes to Peter Pyle, Dave DeSante,and the Point ReyesBird Observatory. Three speciesare added to the state list in this report: Wedge-tailed Shearwater,Ruddy Ground-Dove,and Three-toed Woodpecker.T•hese decisionsand other recent decisions(Roberson 1990) place the total number of bird speciesrecorded in California at 572.
    [Show full text]