DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix File 1987 Pilot Study (1987.Pn)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix File 1987 Pilot Study (1987.Pn) Page 1 of 189 Version 01 Codebook ------------------- CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE 1987 PILOT STUDY (1987.PN) USER NOTE: This file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As as result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. >> OPEN-END RESPONSES FOR THE 1987 PILOT WAVES 1 AND 2 N.B. 1. The first part of this section is a memo by John Zaller, "Cognitive Responses to Survey Questions" which documents and discusses the coding scheme for the cognitive experiments on the Pilot Study. Those who plan to use these data should, without fail, read this memo. 2. The Zaller memo is followed by the open-end master codes: a) direction of response b) emotional intensity and elaboration of thought c) Frame of reference and content code 3. Numerous variables refer to PF 10. PF 10 is a function key used by CATI interviewers in recording comments of respondents. These side comments have been coded for this study. 4. In Wave 2 variables, respondents who were interviewed in Wave 1 but not re-interviewed in Wave 2 have had data variables padded with O's. This is not explicitly stated in the variable documentation. COGNITIVE RESPONSES TO SURVEY QUESTIONS The 1987 Pilot study carried a series of questions designed to elicit information about what is on people's minds as they respond to survey questions. The basic method was to ask individuals a standard policy question and then to use open-ended probes tofind out what exactly the individual thought about that issue. Everything the respondent said -- including such non-political remarks as "that's a tough question" -- was transcribed as faithfully as possible by the interviewer. ftp://ftp.electionstudies.org/ftp/nes/studypages/1987pilot/APPPIL87.txt 10/29/2009 Page 2 of 189 Three domestic policy items, all core items in the regular NES surveys, were used in this research. They were "job guarantees vs. individuals get ahead on own," "increase/decrease government services," and "special aid for blacks vs. blacks get ahead on owns Half of the respondents were asked to give their thoughts about these issues before choosing one of the closed response options, and the other half were asked to talk about the issue just after stating their opinion. In addition, respondents were asked immediately after the standard Presidential approval item to say why they had answered the question as they had. In most cases, respondents were asked three open-ended probes; respondents who provided answers to these probes were asked one follow-up probe, "Any other comments?" (1) In addition, some respondents talked to themselves as they decided how to choose among the fixed options; when they did so, their "think-aloud" remarks were transcribed by interviewers. Up to four comments were coded in connection with each of the three probes (and its associated follow-up); up to three additional comments were coded for respondents' "think-aloud" comments. Thus, coders were prepared to rate up to (1) See the main section of the codebook for the exact question wording. 15 "comments" for each policy item in this series,2 though in the vast majority of cases, the number of "comments" actually coded was much smaller.(3) Each discrete "comment" has been coded on five separate variables, as follows: DIRECTION OF COMMENT. A one-column variable indicating which side of the issue the comment supported, if any. Codes for this variable also cover cases in which the comment exhibits ambivalence, confusion, or a non-substantive concern. FRAME OF REFERENCE. A one-column variable intended to capture differences in the way individuals conceptualize issues. Some, for example, may conceptualize an issue in light of their own experience or needs, while others may use an abstract or ideological frame of reference. SPECIFIC CONTENT. A two column variable intended to capture the specific content of a comment. Separate content codes have been developed for each of the six frames of reference. INTENSITY. A one-column variable intended to capture the level of emotional or affective intensity associated with each comment. Comments which include strong language -- words or phrases such as "ridiculous," "it really makes me angry when ...," "there's going to be a lot of killing unless someone takes care of this problem..."4 -- are coded as high on intensity. This variable runs (1) no evidence of intensity, (2) some evidence of intensity, (3) clear evidence of intensity. COMPLEXITY. A one-column variable intended to measure the presence or absence of relatively highly developed or elaborated thought. For example, a comment that "blacks needed help to ______________ (2) For a handful of respondents who took an "it depends" option on ftp://ftp.electionstudies.org/ftp/nes/studypages/1987pilot/APPPIL87.txt 10/29/2009 Page 3 of 189 one of the policy items, five follow-up probes were asked; in this case, coders were prepared to code up to 20 comments per policy question, plus up to three additional "think-aloud" comments. (3) Coders were instructed to regard each complete thought as a discrete comment. In Wave 11 of the study, interviewers were asked not only to transcribe respondents' comments, but to judge their degree of coherence or connectedness. These judgments are recorded in Vxxx. (4) Current NES policy absolutely prohibits direct quotation of an individual's open-ended comments. Therefore, all references to respondents' comments in this section, including those that appear in quotation remarks, should be considered as representations of the kinds of things individuals said rather than as direct transcriptions of what any one individual said. These representations are, however, intended to capture as faithfully as possible the tone as well as the content of what people said. The NES policy governing this matter reflects, among other things, the concerns of the Human Subjects Committee of the University of Michigan, where the interviews were conducted. The original data from which these codes were built are available for inspection by interested scholars under the usual NES guidelines. _________________ overcome discrimination in the 1950s and 1950s, but since the Great Society came into being, they really don't need any more help" would e coded as complex; a comment that "blacks don't need any special help" would not. Because of the difficulty of making such judgments at the level of discrete comments, this variable involves only two codes: complexity not present (1 ) or present (2). More complete descriptions of the coding categories appear below. Data on the reliability of coding decisions will be released when it becomes available. >> OPEN-END 1987 Pilot Direction of Comment One-column variable 1. Favors liberal side of issue (more government spending, special aid to blacks, government job guarantees). 2. Favors conservative side of issue (less government spending, no special aid to blacks, each individual gets ahead on own) 3. Mention indicates ambivalence, conflict (e.g., "I see merit in both sides"; "that's a tough question"; "depends"; "both are valid points"). 4. Mention is non-political or non-substantive (e.g., "What I was thinking when I said that was that I still have to get the dishes done before I go to bed") 5. Nothing; don't know (e.g.,"honestly, I don't know what I was thinking about when I said that"). 7. Substantive comments in which no directional thrust is evident; R may or may not have intended directional thrust, but difficult to say what it was ftp://ftp.electionstudies.org/ftp/nes/studypages/1987pilot/APPPIL87.txt 10/29/2009 Page 4 of 189 from written material. 9. NA 0. Inappropriate Frame of Reference One-column variable Individuals may conceptualize questions in many different ways. They may think about an issue as one involving high principle, or they may care about it only as it affects them personally. They may mainly care how it affects racial relations, or they may be concerned only with its impact on a particular program, such as education or environmental protection. The "frame of reference" code described below is an attempt to capture such differences in the way people conceptualize political issues. 1. Abstract. This classification should be used for comments which are abstract, moral or possibly ideological. Comments of this type indicate that respondent may have derived or justified an answer to a specific policy question from general principles of rightness, fairness, justice or some other general consideration. Examples of statements that fall into this category: a. Oppose job guarantees because "people will become lazy if they have guaranteed jobs." b. Oppose more government spending because "government is too large already." c. Oppose special help to blacks "because of racial equality" d. Favor job guarantees because "government has an obligation to take care of everyone." e. Favor special help to blacks because Unless everyone has a fair chance, our society will be unjust." 2. Groups. This category should be used for comments that focus on groups or categories of people. Comments of this type suggest that the respondent views the policy issue in light of its impact on particular groups or classes of people, that is, that groups provide the frame of reference by which he/she evaluates the particular issue. Some examples: a. Favor decreasing level of government services because "businessmen will have to pay for it and they can't afford to" b. Favor increasing level of government services "because elderly people are in such great need" [note, favoring more spending for social security would indicate a "program" frame of reference, as described below]. c. Oppose special help to blacks because "blacks are too demanding" or favor it because "they [blacks] need the help." A comment opposing special help to blacks on the grounds that it was reverse discrimination should be coded as having an abstract frame.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Gene Reineke # ISG-A-L-2009-038 Interview # 1: December 7, 2009 Interviewer: Mark Depue
    Interview with Gene Reineke # ISG-A-L-2009-038 Interview # 1: December 7, 2009 Interviewer: Mark DePue COPYRIGHT The following material can be used for educational and other non-commercial purposes without the written permission of the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library. “Fair use” criteria of Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 must be followed. These materials are not to be deposited in other repositories, nor used for resale or commercial purposes without the authorization from the Audio-Visual Curator at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library, 112 N. 6th Street, Springfield, Illinois 62701. Telephone (217) 785-7955 DePue: Today is Monday, December 7, 2009. My name is Mark DePue; I’m the director of oral history at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library. I’m here this afternoon with Eugene Reineke, but you mentioned usually you’re known as Gene. Reineke: That’s correct, Mark. DePue: Why don’t you tell us where we are. Reineke: We’re here at my current employer, which is Hill & Knowlton, Inc. It’s a public relations firm, and we’re located at the Merchandise Mart in downtown Chicago. DePue: Which has a fascinating history itself. Someday I’ll have to delve into that one. We’re obviously here to talk about your experiences in the Edgar administration, but you had a lot of years working with Jim Thompson as well, so we’re going to take quite a bit of time. In today’s session, I don’t know that we’ll get to much of the Edgar experience because you’ve got enough information to talk about before that time, which is valuable history for us.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Banks of Buck Creek
    spring 2009 On The Banks Of Buck Creek Alumnus And Professor Team Up To Transform Springfield Waterway Wittenberg Magazine is published three times a year by Wittenberg University, Office of University Communications. Editor Director of University Communications Karen Saatkamp Gerboth ’93 Graphic Designer Joyce Sutton Bing Design Director of News Services and Sports Information Ryan Maurer Director of New Media and Webmaster Robert Rafferty ’02 Photo Editor Erin Pence ’04 Coordinator of University Communications Phyllis Eberts ’00 Class Notes Editor Charyl Castillo Contributors Gabrielle Antoniadis Ashley Carter ’09 Phyllis Eberts ’00 Robbie Gantt Erik Larkin ’09 Karamagi Rujumba ’02 Brian Schubert ’09 Brad Tucker Address correspondence to: Editor, Wittenberg Magazine Wittenberg University P.O. Box 720 Springfield, Ohio 45501-0720 Phone: (937) 327-6111 Fax: (937) 327-6112 E-mail: [email protected] www.wittenberg.edu Articles are expressly the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily represent official university policy. We reserve the right to edit correspondence for length and accuracy. We appreciate photo submissions, but because of their large number, we cannot return them. Wittenberg University does not discriminate against otherwise qualified persons on the basis of race, creed, color, religion, national or ethnic origin, sex, sexual orientation, age, or disability unrelated to the student’s course of study, in admission or access to the university’s academic programs, activities, and facilities that are generally available to students, or in the administration of its educational policies, admissions policies, scholarship and loan programs, and athletic and other college-administered programs. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Editor, Wittenberg Magazine Wittenberg University P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • ("DSCC") Files This Complaint Seeking an Immediate Investigation by the 7
    COMPLAINT BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION CBHMISSIOAl INTRODUCTXON - 1 The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee ("DSCC") 7-_. J _j. c files this complaint seeking an immediate investigation by the 7 c; a > Federal Election Commission into the illegal spending A* practices of the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee (WRSCIt). As the public record shows, and an investigation will confirm, the NRSC and a series of ostensibly nonprofit, nonpartisan groups have undertaken a significant and sustained effort to funnel "soft money101 into federal elections in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended or "the Act"), 2 U.S.C. 5s 431 et seq., and the Federal Election Commission (peFECt)Regulations, 11 C.F.R. 85 100.1 & sea. 'The term "aoft money" as ueed in this Complaint means funds,that would not be lawful for use in connection with any federal election (e.g., corporate or labor organization treasury funds, contributions in excess of the relevant contribution limit for federal elections). THE FACTS IN TBIS CABE On November 24, 1992, the state of Georgia held a unique runoff election for the office of United States Senator. Georgia law provided for a runoff if no candidate in the regularly scheduled November 3 general election received in excess of 50 percent of the vote. The 1992 runoff in Georg a was a hotly contested race between the Democratic incumbent Wyche Fowler, and his Republican opponent, Paul Coverdell. The Republicans presented this election as a %ust-win81 election. Exhibit 1. The Republicans were so intent on victory that Senator Dole announced he was willing to give up his seat on the Senate Agriculture Committee for Coverdell, if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Box Number: M 17 (Otw./R?C<O R 15
    This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu Robert J. Dole Institute of Politics REMOVAL NOTICE Removed from: S\>QQClt\es, j'Ot1Lt Mc..C.luv\Uj I ( 1 'f<-f Accession: Box Number: m17 (otw./r?C<O r 15 z,cr ~ fftt«r Rt (Jub/t'c CV1 Removed to: Oversized Photographs Box I (Circle one) Oversized Publications Box Campaign Material Box Oversized Newsprint Box Personal Effects Box Mem~rabilia Btm- _:£__ Oversized Flats [Posters, Handbills, etc] Box Political Cartoons Box -- Textiles Box Photograph Collection Box \ ,,,,,,,.... 4" Size: X , 2 5 >< • 7J Format: Pi v'\ Description: Ret k~v\o.>1 Dat~: rn4 > ol ""'~\ t ~', Subject Terms (ifanyJ. Restrictions: none Remarks: Place one copy with removed item Place one copy in original folder File one copy in file Page 1 of 188 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu Robert J. Dole Institute of Politics REMOVAL NOTICE Date: from: ~pe (!c_~J Jt:'~C. e rf)c C..lun ji l'7°1 Accession: Box Number: B 0 ~ \ t ro 'I"' l'l • l 5 6L/ /;;Ff So'"":t-h.v\V"'\ 'R-e._plA l; co-"' ~~~~ Removed to: Oversized Photographs Box C.O~t-('U"UL.. ( C ircle one) Oversized Publications Box Campaign Material Box Oversized Newsprint Box Personal Effects Box Memorabilia -:tJ1f X Oversized Flats [Posters, Handbills, etc] Box __ Political Cartoons Box Textiles Box Photograph Collection Box Restrictions: none Remarks: Place one copy with removed item Place one copy in original folder File one copy in file Page 2 of 188 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu WH"A T , S .INN AT ENGL ..ISH MANOR AND LA.KE .RA.BUN .INNS ..IN 1 994 FOR THOSE OF YOU #HO HAVEN'T BEEN OUR t;UESTS IN THE PAST OR HAVEN'T VISITED US RECENTLY, ENt;LISH ANO I #OULO LIKE TO ACQUAINT YOU ANO BRINE; YOU UP TO DATE.
    [Show full text]
  • The Superconducting Super Collider Collection
    557 CA^e S^^x-m IL6of 1990-8 The Superconducting Super Collider Collection: Bibliography and Archival Listing of Materials at the Illinois State Geological Survey compiled by Patricia G. Wasson Open File Series 1990-8 Illinois State Geological Survey . 615 East Peabody Drive rfc' Champaign, IL 61820 KP <S LIBRARY. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY .LLINO.S STATE 3 3051 00006 9694 The Superconducting Super Collider Collection Bibliography and Archival Listing of Materials at the Illinois State Geological Survey compiled by Patricia Gobert Wasson Open File Series 1990-S o^ Illinois State Geological Survey C^ aiv 615 East Peabody Drive \*=> 0$^. Champaign, IL 61820 v\O^V\iC^ Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://archive.org/details/superconductings19908wass s TABLE OF CONTENTS I INTRODUCTION 3 PART ONE: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 3 Illinois Research 3 Proposal Documents 4 Publications and Manuscripts 9 Maps and Logs II Background Materials Used in Illinois Research 11 Miscellaneous Materials 14 Fermilab Material 15 Original Fermilab (Weston Site) Siting Documents 17 SSC Publications by Other States 20 Publications on National SSC Efforts 20 Federal Government Documents 21 Scoping Meeting Documents 27 Universities Research Association Publications 30 Audiovisual Collection 31 Photograph Collection 32 Articles Collection 32 SSC Articles 37 General Science and Physics 40 Editorials and Letters to the Editor 42 PART TWO: ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FILES LISTING 42 AR Files 46 Illinois Geological
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter One: Postwar Resentment and the Invention of Middle America 10
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Certificate for Approving the Dissertation We hereby approve the Dissertation of Jeffrey Christopher Bickerstaff Doctor of Philosophy ________________________________________ Timothy Melley, Director ________________________________________ C. Barry Chabot, Reader ________________________________________ Whitney Womack Smith, Reader ________________________________________ Marguerite S. Shaffer, Graduate School Representative ABSTRACT TALES FROM THE SILENT MAJORITY: CONSERVATIVE POPULISM AND THE INVENTION OF MIDDLE AMERICA by Jeffrey Christopher Bickerstaff In this dissertation I show how the conservative movement lured the white working class out of the Democratic New Deal Coalition and into the Republican Majority. I argue that this political transformation was accomplished in part by what I call the "invention" of Middle America. Using such cultural representations as mainstream print media, literature, and film, conservatives successfully exploited what came to be known as the Social Issue and constructed "Liberalism" as effeminate, impractical, and elitist. Chapter One charts the rise of conservative populism and Middle America against the backdrop of 1960s social upheaval. I stress the importance of backlash and resentment to Richard Nixon's ascendancy to the Presidency, describe strategies employed by the conservative movement to win majority status for the GOP, and explore the conflict between this goal and the will to ideological purity. In Chapter Two I read Rabbit Redux as John Updike's attempt to model the racial education of a conservative Middle American, Harry "Rabbit" Angstrom, in "teach-in" scenes that reflect the conflict between the social conservative and Eastern Liberal within the author's psyche. I conclude that this conflict undermines the project and, despite laudable intentions, Updike perpetuates caricatures of the Left and hastens Middle America's rejection of Liberalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Meet Our Tenth Dems Interns!
    August 2019 Tenth www.tenthdems.org News Meet Our Tenth Dems Interns! Lucas Brodsky is an incoming senior at Lake Forest College. He is majoring in Politics with a ALSO IN THIS ISSUE: focus in American politics and enjoys watching TV in his free time. Lucas has previously · State Rep. Joyce campaigned for Bernie Sanders preceding the 2016 primaries. He supports the Democratic Party Mason: My First because he believes taxation should be more evenly distributed based on wealth and because he Legislative Session values scientific evidence. · Democratic Debate Watch Parties Hosted Karina De Avila is completing her master’s degree from the Adler School of Public Policy in by Tenth Dems hopes of having a career in either healthcare, immigration or international policy. Karina is · Congressman actively committed to promoting just immigration policies and ensuring all Americans have Schneider’s Hearing to Investigate Foxconn, access to quality healthcare. Karina serves as the vice president of IGNITE, an organization that Downstream Flooding helps to elect women to political office. After getting her master’s, she plans to serve in an · Tenth Dems At organization where she can utilize her vision and passion to build a truly inclusive society where Highland Park’s July no one is left behind. 4th Parade! · Update on Choice Julian Dutton is starting his junior year at Loyola University Chicago where he is majoring in political science with a minor in Italian. In addition to politics, Julian is very interested in Italian · Expungement Summit a Success with Help culture and language and lived in Italy for two years.
    [Show full text]
  • Wyoming Election Survey 1986
    1986 Election Survey COUNTY Let's begin. What county do you live in? (1) Albany (13) Natrona (2) Big Horn (14) Niobrara (3) Campbell (15) Park (4) Carbon (16) Platte (5) Converse (17) Sheridan (6) Crook (18) Sublette (7) Fremont (19) Sweetwater (8) Goshen (20) Teton (9) Hot Springs (21) Uinta (10) Johnson (22) Washakie (11) Laramie (23) Weston 1. First a question about Wyoming. All communities in our state face certain PROB1 problems which need to be solved. What do you think is the most pressing PROB2 problem in your community? VOTE84 2. Thinking back to the 1984 Presidential Election, when Walter Mondale ran against Ronald Reagan, do you remember for sure whether you voted in that election or not? 1. Yes, voted 2. No, did not vote 8. Don’t Know 9. Refused to answer PRES84 2.A. Did you vote for Walter Mondale, Ronald Reagan or some other candidate? 1. Mondale 2. Reagan 3. Other 8. Don’t Know 9. Refused to answer REGAPP 3. First, how would you rate the job Ronald Reagan is doing as President of the United States? Would you say: 1. Excellent 2. Good 3. Fair 4. Poor 8. Don’t Know 4. What about foreign affairs. Would you rate the job Ronald Reagan is doing as: REGFAFF 1. Excellent 2. Good 3. Fair 4. Poor 8. Don’t Know 5. And what about Regan’s handling of the nation’s economy. Would you rate the REGDOM job he has done as: 1. Excellent 2. Good 3. Fair 4. Poor 8. Don’t Know 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of the American Knowledge Economy*
    The Politics of the American Knowledge Economy* Nicholas Short Harvard University [email protected] August 07, 2020 Abstract The American knowledge economy (AKE) is not a mysterious transition in the organization of economic production. It is instead a politically generated consensus for producing economic prosperity in which intellectual property, and the businesses that produce it, play a leading role. The history of AKE development reveals as much and also shows that, while the legal regimes governing the AKE achieved bipartisan consensus, the AKE would not have emerged without a fundamental realignment within the Democratic Party. The history also shows that the AKE has severe distributional consequences and recent empirical work reinforces the view that the AKE is an engine of geographic, economic, and political inequality. Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Characterizing Knowledge Economies 3 3 The Post-War Consensus and the American Knowledge Society 6 4 Three Geographies for American Knowledge Economy Development 10 4.1 The global knowledge economy . 11 4.2 The national industrial innovation debate . 15 4.3 The entrepreneurial states . 20 5 The American Knowledge Economy as an Engine of Inequality 23 5.1 Geographic inequality . 24 5.2 Economic inequality . 27 5.3 Political inequality . 30 6 Conclusion 31 *Thanks will go here. 1 1 Introduction For more than forty years, scholars have explored the idea first articulated by Bell (1974) and others that, starting in the 1970s, the United States transitioned from a Fordist economy rooted
    [Show full text]
  • Campaign Trips (4)” of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 32, folder “Campaign Trips (4)” of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Ron Nessen donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 32 of The Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library i MO:i\JJA Y - NOVEMBER I, 1976 AKRON-CANTON, OHIO ! E vent No. 1 RALLY- Firestone Hangar, 1 Akron- c~nton Airport. REMARKS. COLUMBUS, OHIO Event No. 2 RALLY - State Capitol Steps. REMARKS. Event No. 3 Drop-By Fort Hayes Career Center. Visit various work/training labs. REMARKS to Student Body. LIVONIA, MICHIGAN ' . Event No. 4 RALLY - Wonderland Center (Shopping Mall) - REMARKS. GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN Event No. 5 WELCOMING PARADE. Event No. 6 Dedication o£ the Gerald R. Ford Health and Physical Education Building at Grand Rapids Junior C~llege. REMARKS. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON CAMPAIGN SWING AKRON-CANTON, OHIO COLUMBUS, OHIO LIVONIA, MICHIGAN GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN MONDAY- NOVEMBER 1, 1976 DAY# 10 First Event: 9:45A.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Results Template
    Kids Voting Central Ohio November 2, 2010 2010 General Election Ballot Results Governor/Lt. Governor Name Party Votes Pct Ted Strickland / Yvette McGee Brown Democratic 20,996 42.56% John Kasich / Mary Taylor Republican 19,529 39.59% Ken Matesz / Margaret Ann Leech Libertarian 4,506 9.13% Dennis Spisak / Anita Rios Green 4,303 8.72% Total Votes Cast 49,334 Attorney General Name Party Votes Pct Richard Cordray Democratic 10,531 44.80% Mike DeWine Republican 8,699 37.01% Robert Owens Constitution 2,467 10.50% Marc Allan Feldman Libertarian 1,809 7.70% Total Votes Cast 23,506 Auditor of State Name Party Votes Pct David Pepper Democratic 12,813 55.30% David Yost Republican 7,315 31.57% L. Michael Howard Libertarian 3,042 13.13% Total Votes Cast 23,170 Secretary of State Name Party Votes Pct Maryellen O'Shaughnessy Democratic 11,611 50.15% Jon Husted Republican 8,386 36.22% Charles R. Earl Libertarian 3,157 13.63% Total Votes Cast 23,154 Treasurer of State Name Party Votes Pct Kevin L. Boyce Democratic 11,233 48.63% Josh Mandel Republican 8,815 38.16% Matthew P. Cantrell Libertarian 3,050 13.20% Total Votes Cast 23,098 U.S. Senator Name Party Votes Pct Lee Fisher Democratic 15,517 40.53% Rob Portman Republican 11,614 30.34% Daniel LaBotz Socialist 4,309 11.26% Michael L. Pryce n/a 3,961 10.35% Eric W. Deaton Constitution 2,882 7.53% Total Votes Cast 38,283 Supreme Court Chief Justice Name Party Votes Pct Eric Brown n/a 5,742 58.32% Maureen O'Connor n/a 4,104 41.68% Total Votes Cast 9,846 Supreme Court Justice Name Party Votes Pct Mary Jane Trapp n/a 5,565 57.09% Judith Lanzinger n/a 4,182 42.91% Total Votes Cast 9,747 Page 1 of 4 Kids Voting Central Ohio November 2, 2010 Franklin County Commissioner Name Party Votes Pct Marilyn Brown Democratic 12,136 58.38% Julie Hubler Republican 8,653 41.62% Total Votes Cast 20,789 Franklin County Auditor Name Party Votes Pct Terry J.
    [Show full text]