Statewide Freight System Plan Revised

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Statewide Freight System Plan Revised Statewide Freight System Plan NOVEMBER 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................. I PURPOSE AND SCOPE ............................................................................................................................... 1 Plan Structure .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Minnesota Go Vision for Transportation .......................................................................................................... 2 Federal Legislation .......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.0 THE IMPORTANCE OF FREIGHT TO MINNESOTA ...................................................................... 9 Minnesota’s Economy ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Minnesota’s Freight-Related Industries ......................................................................................................... 11 Freight Trends: Minnesota and Beyond ......................................................................................................... 14 2.0 MINNESOTA’S FREIGHT ASSETS AND USE .............................................................................. 25 Minnesota’s Freight System Assets ............................................................................................................... 25 Minnesota Freight System Demand ............................................................................................................... 27 Freight System Demand by Mode ................................................................................................................. 33 Minnesota’s Designated Principal Freight Network ....................................................................................... 39 3.0 MINNESOTA’S FREIGHT NEEDS AND ISSUES .......................................................................... 41 Condition and Performance of the Freight System ........................................................................................ 41 Freight System Needs and Issues ................................................................................................................. 51 Freight System Opportunities ........................................................................................................................ 59 4.0 STRATEGIES TO ADDRESS MINNESOTA’S FREIGHT NEEDS AND ISSUES .......................... 60 What is a “Freight” Project? ........................................................................................................................... 60 Infrastructure Investment Needs .................................................................................................................... 61 Supporting Strategies and Actions................................................................................................................. 73 5.0 ACTIONS AND NEXT STEPS ....................................................................................................... 85 Minnesota’s Freight Action Agenda ............................................................................................................... 85 The Role of the Minnesota Freight Advisory Committee................................................................................ 86 MINNESOTA GO STATEWIDE FREIGHT SYSTEM PLAN PAGE i LIST OF TABLES Table 0.1 How MAP-21 National Freight Policy Goals are Addressed in this Freight Plan ...................................... 6 Table 0.2 How MAP-21 National Freight Plan Requirements and U.S. DOT Recommendations are Addressed in this Freight Plan ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Table 1.1 Importance of Transportation Modes to Minnesota’s Freight-Related Industries .................................... 11 Table 2.1 Major Highway Commodities, Total, 2040 .............................................................................................. 33 Table 2.2 Rail Freight Volumes by Minnesota Railroad (2012-2040, in Thousands) .............................................. 34 Table 2.3 Major Railroad Commodities, Total, 2040 .............................................................................................. 36 Table 2.4 Major Waterway Commodities, Total, 2012 ............................................................................................ 37 Table 2.5 Major Air Commodities, Total, 2040 ....................................................................................................... 38 Table 2.6 Major Pipeline Commodities, Total, 2040 ............................................................................................... 38 Table 3.1 Freight System Performance Measures ................................................................................................. 43 Table 3.2 Overall Assessment of Multimodal Freight System ................................................................................ 44 Table 3.3 Crashes Involving Commercial Trucks on Major Roadways – 2014 ....................................................... 45 Table 5.1 Minnesota Freight Action Agenda ........................................................................................................... 87 MINNESOTA GO STATEWIDE FREIGHT SYSTEM PLAN PAGE ii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 Job Growth in Minnesota, in Thousands, by Major Occupational Group, 2012–2022 .............................. 9 Figure 1.2 Gross State Product, Minnesota and Neighboring States (Millions of 2013 $USD) ................................ 10 Figure 1.3 Industry Sectors as Percent of Minnesota GSP (with Freight-Related Industries in Bold Text) .............. 10 Figure 1.4 Visualization of a Supply Chain .............................................................................................................. 12 Figure 1.5 Sand Mining and Horizontal Drilling ........................................................................................................ 16 Figure 1.6 Cost Advantage Regions by Ship Size ................................................................................................... 17 Figure 1.7 Popular Northwest Passage Routes ....................................................................................................... 18 Figure 1.8 U.S. E-Commerce Sales, 2014-2018 ..................................................................................................... 20 Figure 1.9 Volvo Road Train Premier ...................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 2.1 Mode Share by Weight, 2012 and 2040 ................................................................................................. 27 Figure 2.2 Mode Share by Value, 2012 and 2040 ................................................................................................... 28 Figure 2.3 Statewide Tonnage (left) and Value (Right) of Commodities by Mode and Direction, 2012. .................. 29 Figure 2.4 Major Freight Commodities by Tonnage, 2012 (left) and 2040 (right) .................................................... 29 Figure 2.5 Major Freight Commodities by Value, 2012 (left) and 2040 (right) ......................................................... 30 Figure 2.6 Major Domestic Trading Partners by Total Tonnage, 2012 (left) and 2040 (right) .................................. 31 Figure 2.7 Minnesota’s Major Foreign Trading Partners by Total Value, 2013 ........................................................ 32 Figure 2.8 Top Border Crossings for Minnesota-Canada Trade Value ($1,000), 2013............................................ 32 Figure 2.9 Truck Freight Flows by Direction, Tons, by District, 2012 ....................................................................... 34 Figure 2.10 Total Rail Tonnage by Equipment Type, 2012 (left) and 2040 (right) ..................................................... 35 Figure 2.11 Total Rail Units by Equipment Type, 2012 (left) and 2040 (right) ........................................................... 35 Figure 2.12 Minnesota’s Principal Freight Network ................................................................................................... 40 Figure 3.1 10-Year Accident/Incident Overview by Calendar Year, Minnesota ....................................................... 46 Figure 3.2 Minnesota 2012 Transportation Results Scorecard (Freight) ................................................................. 50 Figure 4.1 STIP Funding by MnSHIP Investment Category..................................................................................... 66 Figure 4.2 STIP Freight Project Funding by District ................................................................................................. 67 Figure 4.3 Freight-Related STIP Projects on the NHS Network .............................................................................. 68 MINNESOTA GO STATEWIDE FREIGHT SYSTEM PLAN PAGE iii PURPOSE AND SCOPE The 2016 Minnesota Statewide Freight System Plan represents an update to Minnesota’s first State Freight Plan developed in 2005. The development of this plan was
Recommended publications
  • Streamlining Sustainability
    Streamlining Sustainability Regulatory and Permitting Improvements to Achieve California’s Freight Goals December 2018 About this Report This report is the result of a convening with regulators, advocates, industry members, and other stakeholders in California’s freight system, jointly sponsored and organized by the California Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development, the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, and UC Berkeley School of Law’s Center for Law, Energy & the Environment. This report and its recommendations are solely a product of the UC Berkeley School of Law and do not necessarily reflect the views of all individual convening participants, reviewers, or the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development or the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research. About CLEE The Center for Law, Energy & the Environment (CLEE) channels the expertise of the Berkeley Law community into pragmatic policy solutions to environmental and energy challenges in California and across the nation. CLEE works with government, business, and communities on initiatives that focus on reducing greenhouse gas emissions, advancing the transition to renewable energy, and ensuring clean water for California’s future. Authorship The authors of this report are Ted Lamm, Research Fellow in the Climate Program at CLEE, and Ethan N. Elkind, Director of the Climate Program at CLEE. Acknowledgments The authors and organizers thank the many participants and experts who provided their insight and commentary at the June 2018 convening that informed this analysis, as well as careful review of and suggestions for this report: Ken Alex, Rob Ball, Mark Christoffels, LaDonna DiCamillo, Matt Davis, Paula Dowell, Joel Espino, Fran Inman, Michael Jacob, Elizabeth John, Weston LaBar, David Libatique, Cynthia Marvin, Nick Monroy, Frank Ramirez, Jonathan Rosenthal, Dakota Semler, Chris Schmidt, Chris Shimoda, Richard Steinke, Jeff Stiles, Pamela Williams, and John Yandell III.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Methodological Researches Concerning ITS in Freight Transport
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 111 ( 2014 ) 994 – 1003 EWGT2013 – 16th Meeting of the EURO Working Group on Transportation Advanced methodological researches concerning ITS in freight transport Domenico Gattusoa, Domenica Savia Pellicanòa,* aDIEES, “Mediterranea” University, Feo di Vito, Reggio Calabria 89124, Italy Abstract This paper analyzes methods and models for ITS applications in freight transport. A new interpretation is provided, which collects and groups studies into five macro-categories, according to the spatial context in which the supply chain works. The analysis is based on the approaches adopted by different authors: statistical surveys, “what if” and “what to” analyses and project proposals. © 2013 The Authors. PublishedPublished by by Elsevier Elsevier Ltd. Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review underunder responsibility responsibility of of Scientific Scientific Committee Committee. Keywords: ITS; ICT; Freight transport; Logistics; Models. 1. Introduction The term ITS, “Intelligent Transportation System”, refers to integrated telematics, communication, control and automation technologies that significantly contribute to improve the quality of transport services. At the end of last century, studies about ITS applications were mainly focussed on urban public transport. Then, the topic has developed to include all transport modes and levels, for both passengers and goods, and to take into account the material flow, i.e. the handling and storage of physical entities, and the information flow, which takes place at the different business levels and may support the decision-making process. ITS availability have led to new problems and new management tools, encouraging sector research on new themes, such as real time congestion control or dynamic navigation.
    [Show full text]
  • FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION Improvements and the Economy Quality Assurance Statement
    U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION Improvements and the Economy Quality Assurance Statement The Federal Highway Administration provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary iii Freight Transportation: Today’s Challenge 1 Understanding the Links Between Transportation and the Economy 2 Microeconomic Research: FHWA’s Benefit-Cost Analysis Study 5 Phase I: Documenting Benefits 5 First-Order Benefits of Transportation Investments 6 Second-Order Benefits of Transportation Investments 6 i Phase II: Turning Concepts into an Analytical Tool 7 Conclusion 8 References 9 Appendix A: Economic Effects of Transportation: The Freight Story A-1 Appendix B: Transportation Infrastructure, Freight Services Sector and Economic Growth: A Synopsis B-1 FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS AND THE ECONOMY FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS AND THE ECONOMY Executive Summary Despite the wealth of information on transportation’s contribution to the economy, debate continues on the linkages between transportation improvements and economic performance and the relative strength of these links. Focusing on freight transportation, this report summarizes the results of the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA’s) work on the economic benefits of transportation improvements. In addition to this summary, two analytical reports are included as appendices: 1) Economic Effects of Transportation: The Freight Story; and 2) Transportation Infrastructure, Freight Services Sector and Economic Growth: A Synopsis.
    [Show full text]
  • Integration of Urban Freight Innovations: Sustainable Inner-Urban Intermodal Transportation in the Retail/Postal Industry
    sustainability Article Integration of Urban Freight Innovations: Sustainable Inner-Urban Intermodal Transportation in the Retail/Postal Industry Zhangyuan He 1,2,* and Hans-Dietrich Haasis 1 1 Maritime Business and Logistics, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany; [email protected] 2 International Graduate School for Dynamics in Logistics, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-174-8652437 Received: 27 February 2019; Accepted: 17 March 2019; Published: 22 March 2019 Abstract: Urban population growth has permanently increased the commodity demands and freight flow within urban areas. The retail/postal industry is intent on finding appropriate internal approaches and a new business model to respond to the adverse impacts generated by urban freight activities. Usage of emerging transport modes is an efficient solution for these industries. Nevertheless, considerable research has paid less attention to the implementation status of distribution innovations, as well as to their suitability and application restrictions. Concurrently, a comprehensive consideration of various distribution innovations that operate together as a system is lacking. To this end, this paper adopted a literature review method and GE multifactorial analysis. Specifically, this paper reviewed the related articles that were published in the past six years (2013–2018) to define the concept of distribution innovations. In addition, we adopted the approach of GE multifactorial analysis to analyze the application status of distribution innovations from the perspective of academic research and company implementation. Following the suitability assessment and application of restriction analysis, we proposed the concept of sustainable inner-urban intermodal transport (SIUIT) for the retail/postal industry.
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure of Freight Flows in Europe and Its Implications for EU Railway Freight Policy
    The structure of freight flows in Europe and its implications for EU railway freight policy by Kay Mitusch, Gernot Liedtke, Laurent Guihery, David Bälz No. 61 | SEPTEMBER 2014 WORKING PAPER SERIES IN ECONOMICS KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Laboratory of the Helmholtz Association econpapers.wiwi.kit.edu Impressum Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre (ECON) Schlossbezirk 12 76131 Karlsruhe KIT – Universität des Landes Baden-Württemberg und nationales Forschungszentrum in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Working Paper Series in Economics No. 61, September 2014 ISSN 2190-9806 econpapers.wiwi.kit.edu The Structure of Freight Flows in Europe and its Implications for EU Railway Freight Policy Kay Mitusch, Gernot Liedtke, Laurent Guihery, David Bälz1 Abstract We analyse the potential for shifting freight transports to the railways in Western and Cen- tral Europe. This potential arises for large and concentrated freight flows over long distances of about 300 km or more. However, we show that there are only few such freight flows in Europe, and that they are concentrated or connected to the central European population centers, sometimes called the “Blue Banana”. As a consequence, the European railway freight corridors according to EU Regulation 913/2010 should be divided into two distinct groups: first tier and second tier corridors. Substantial innovations should be introduced on the first tier corridors first, in order to increase efficiency
    [Show full text]
  • International Freight Transport Multimodal Development in Developing Countries
    INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT TRANSPORT MULTIMODAL DEVELOPMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: THE CASE OF BANGLADESH by DEWAN MOHAMMAD ZAHURUL ISLAM A thesis submitted to the University of Plymouth in partial fulfilment for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY International Shipping and Logistics Group Plymouth Business School 2005 ABSTRACT INTERNATIONAL FREIGHT TRANSPORT MULTIMODAL DEVELOPMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: THE CASE OF BANGLADESH By: DEWAN MOHAMMAD 2AHURUL ISLAM An efficient transport system is essential for an efficient supply chain to facilitate international trade. To utilise all cheaper resources, such as labour in Bangladesh, companies receive supplies from one coxintry (e.g. in Hong Kong), produce the products in another country, and sell them in other countries (e.g. European countries). Thus the production and consumption has turned into a global activity with transport filling the gaps among them. To perform the transport function a carrier may require the use of more than one mode, the so-called multimodal transport. Multimodal transport, an integrated systems approach, can be defined as the most cost- and time-effective way of moving goods from shipper to consignee by at least two different modes of transport under a single contract. The system has been operating for more than three decades in developed countries, but in developing countries the transport system is still operating in a conventional fragmented way where modal integration has not been achieved. In particular the inland part of the international transport haul has appeared as a barrier to establishing an integrated multimodal transport system. In general, the transport systems in developing countries have failed to contribute to effective international supply chain.
    [Show full text]
  • Cargo-Oriented Development (COD) Concept and Opportunity
    Cargo-Oriented Development (COD) Concept and Opportunity Job creation and environmental benefits through the coordination of freight transportation, land use, and economic development PREPARED BY THE CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TECHNOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2013 Cover Photo Credit: Christopher and Amy Cate via Flickr/CC Synergistic Investments Class I railroads are investing more than $20 billion The synergies of concentrating industrial businesses at annually in facilities and equipment. This creates freight transportation nodes have been recognized for a tremendous opportunity for mutually beneficial more than a decade in professional literature that discusses partnerships among the rail industry, logistics firms, and “freight villages,” “logistics platforms,” and “freight zones.”1 state and local governments. The benefits of this investment Over the last ten years, newly constructed logistics/industrial can be captured in substantially more efficient operations, parks adjacent to intermodal terminals have demonstrated environmental improvement, and job retention and creation this beneficial relationship by generating thousands of through promotion of Cargo-Oriented Development jobs.2 Research also demonstrates that preserving and (COD). COD may be defined as the development of places modernizing freight facilities in established communities that are both multi-modal nodes of freight transportation can be crucial to the retention of thousands of industrial and centers of employment in logistics and manufacturing jobs, as well as the creation of new
    [Show full text]
  • National Its/Intermodal Frieght Program
    National ITS/Intermodal Freight Program Requirements Final Report, ITS/Intermodal Freight Program Commercial Vehicle Fleet Management and Information Systems, Phase II Contract No. DTFH61-93-C-00084 October 1999 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade and manu- facturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the object of the document. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date National ITS/Intermodal Freight Program Requirements October 1999 6. Performing Organizational Code 7. Author (s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Lance Grenzeback, Molly Markert 6827.001 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 150 CambridgePark Drive Suite 4000 11. Contract or Grant No. Cambridge, MA 02140 DTFH61-93-C-00084 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Federal Highway Administration Final Report, 1997-1999 Office of Acquisition Management, HAM-30A 400 Seventh Street, S.W. 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Room 4410 Washington, DC 20590 15. Supplementary Notes Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative – Gene McHale, FHWA, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center Anne Aylward from the Volpe National Transportation System Center served as a senior advisor to this project. 16. Abstract This report recommends the development of a national intelligent transportation system (ITS) program for intermodal freight that will promote the application of ITS technology to enhance the safety, reliability, and responsiveness of the intermodal freight system.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward Improved Intermodal Freight Transport Between Europe and the United States: Report of the Third EU–US Forum
    Toward Improved Intermodal Freight Transport Between Europe and the United States: Report of the Third EU–US Forum Based on an Eno Transportation Foundation Policy Forum held November 3-5, 1999, in New York Sponsored by: European Commission Directorate-General VII (Transport) US Department of Transportation Office of Intermodalism and Federal Highway Administration Published by Eno Transportation Foundation, Inc. 1634 I St., NW, Suite 500 Washington, DC 20006-4003 Tel: 202-879-4700 Fax: 202-879-4719 Board of Directors Lawrence D. Dahms Lillian C. Borrone Joseph M. Clapp Norman Y. Mineta Thomas J. O’Bryant Ted Tedesco Staff Damian J. Kulash, President and CEO Robert Ritter, Director, Policy Activities Kathryn Harrington-Hughes, Director of Operations Cover design: Daydream Design, Leesburg, VA Cover photo: © 2000 John McGrail. All rights reserved. Layout: Wow! Designs, Washington, DC © 2000 Eno Transportation Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved. Permission to quote from, or reproduce material in, this publication is granted when the following acknowledgment is made: “Reproduced from Toward Improved Intermodal Freight Transport Between Europe and the United States: Report of the Third EU-US Forum, with permission from Eno Transportation Foundation, Inc., Washington, DC.” Table of Contents Preface ........................................................................................................................................ v Executive Summary .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Dissertation Entitled Technology Systems and Practices In
    A Dissertation entitled Technology Systems and Practices in Transportation and Logistics: Exploring the Links Toward Competitive Advantage in Supply Chains by Sarah E. Schafer Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Manufacturing and Technology Management ________________________________________________ Dr. Mark Vonderembse, Committee Chair ________________________________________________ Dr. P. Sundararaghavan, Committee Member ________________________________________________ Dr. Thomas Sharkey, Committee Member ________________________________________________ Dr. Peter Lindquist, Committee Member ________________________________________________ Dr. Patricia R. Komuniecki, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo May 2015 Copyright 2015, Sarah E. Schafer This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. ii An Abstract of Technology Systems and Practices in Transportation and Logistics: Exploring the Links Toward Competitive Advantage in Supply Chains by Sarah E. Schafer Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Manufacturing and Technology Management The University of Toledo May 2015 Higher demands for a variety of products add not only to the complexity of coordinating a supply chain, but also to the number of freight movements to support those demands. The increased demand for moving materials and goods contributes to higher levels of congestion and pollution during a time when businesses, customers and governments are increasingly concerned with reducing carbon footprints. To this end, new technologies and data capabilities are emerging that can add integrated visibility (monitoring and tracing), efficiency and even sustainability within the supply chain in order to mitigate these issues and cultivate an ever desired competitive advantage.
    [Show full text]
  • Blockchain in Air Cargo: Challenges of New World
    MATEC Web of Conferences 341, 00021 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202134100021 ITMTS 2021 Blockchain in air cargo: challenges of new World Irina Poleshkina1* 1Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation, Kronshtadtskiy Blvd. 20, Moscow, Russia Abstract. The last years’ experience of functioning during the COVID-19 pandemic has shown that digital solutions can significantly increase the efficiency of business operational processes. This study focuses on the implementation of digital technologies at the airports to optimize information and financial flows, that are required for the air cargo transportation. The study was carried out based on the analysis of technological schedules of airports and airlines for cargo handling. As a result of this study, we have identified the main problematic operations leading to an increase in the time spent by cargo at the airports. The article examines and summarizes the world practice of using blockchain technology to manage information and financial flows in air cargo. The article has developed a model for the implementation of these technologies in the air cargo industry on the basis of a single blockchain platform. This model allows making optimal use of available airport resources in order to minimize service delays. It solves the main problem of creating the transparency of the information exchange between all air cargo transportation participants. Air transportation plays very important role in modern economy. According to IATA, about 35% of the turnover of international supply chains in value terms and 1% in physical volume is carried out by air [1]. In 2019, worldwide airfreight traffic rose to 61,2 million metrics tons [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Freight Plan
    DRAFT December 2018 1 COLORADO FREIGHT PLAN 2 COLORADO FREIGHT PLAN FAST Act Requirements Colorado Freight Plan Reference(s) Identification of significant statewide freight trends, needs, and Chapter 5 – Assessing Assets and Condition issues Chapter 4 – Connecting the Economy Description of freight policies, strategies, and performance measures Chapter 6 – Moving Forward that will guide freight-related transportation investment decisions Chapter 7 – Investing Resources Chapter 7 – Investing Resources Critical multimodal rural freight facilities and rural and urban freight corridors Appendix A – Critical Rural and Urban Freight Corridors Link to national multimodal freight policy and highway freight Chapter 6 – Moving Forward program goals Description of how innovative technologies and operational strategies Chapter 5 – Assessing Assets and Condition that improve the safety and efficiency of freight movements were considered Chapter 6 – Moving Forward Description of improvements to reduce roadway deterioration by heavy vehicles (including mining, agricultural, energy cargo or Chapter 5 – Assessing Assets and Condition equipment, and timber vehicles) Inventory of facilities with freight mobility issues and a description of the strategies the state is employing to address the freight mobility Chapter 5 – Assessing Assets and Condition issues Description of significant congestion or delay caused by freight Chapter 5 – Assessing Assets and Condition movements and any mitigation strategies Freight investment plan that includes a list of priority projects and Chapter 7 – Investing Resources describes investment and matching funds Appendix B – Freight Investment Plan Chapter 2 – Planning for the Future Consultation with the state Freight Advisory Committee Chapter 3 – Engaging Stakeholders 3 COLORADO FREIGHT PLAN The Colorado Freight Plan provides short-term actions and long-term guidance for CDOT, public agency and private industry partners, and members of the Colorado Freight Advisory Council.
    [Show full text]