DOCSLIB.ORG

Eeurope Report April 2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The eEurope ReportTM April 2001 www.emarketer.com The eEurope Report Table of Contents 3 Methodology: The eMarketer Difference 9 I Economy, Infrastructure and Users 11 A. Population and Economy 12 B. Technology Infrastructure 18 C. Internet Users 40 II eCommerce 45 A. Overview 46 B. B2C eCommerce 54 C. B2B eCommerce 72 D. eCommerce Barriers and Drivers 75 III eAdvertising 93 A. Overview 94 B. Advertising Spending by Country 96 IV eFinance 97 A. eBanking 98 B. eInvesting 103 C. IT Spending 104 D. Expectations: Supply-Side Vs. Buy-Side 108 V eWireless 111 A. Overview 112 B. Technology Infrastructure 113 C. Mobile Internet Users and Usage 135 D. mCommerce 141 E. mFinance 144 F.mAdvertising 147 VI Denmark 151 A. Overview 152 B. Internet Users 153 C. eDemographics 154 D. B2C eCommerce 159 E. B2B eCommerce 161 F.eWireless 163 3 ©2001 eMarketer, Inc. Reproduction of information sourced as eMarketer is prohibited without prior, written permission. Note: all data in this report (other than that sourced as eMarketer) was obtained from published, publicly available information. The eEurope Report VII Finland 165 A. Overview 166 B. Internet Users 167 C. eDemographics 168 D. B2C eCommerce 173 E. B2B eCommerce 175 F.eWireless 176 VIII France 179 A. Overview 180 B. Internet Users 181 C. eDemographics 183 D. B2C eCommerce 191 E. B2B eCommerce 195 F.eAdvertising 197 G. eFinance 198 H. eWireless 199 IX Germany 205 A. Overview 206 B. Internet Users 207 C. eDemographics 209 D. B2C eCommerce 220 E. B2B eCommerce 227 F.eAdvertising 228 G. eFinance 229 H. eWireless 231 X Italy 235 A. Overview 236 B. Internet Users 237 C. eDemographics 239 D. B2C eCommerce 245 E. B2B eCommerce 248 F.eFinance 250 4 ©2001 eMarketer, Inc. Reproduction of information sourced as eMarketer is prohibited without prior, written permission. Note: all data in this report (other than that sourced as eMarketer) was obtained from published, publicly available information. The eEurope Report G. eWireless 252 XI The Netherlands 255 A. Overview 256 B. Internet Users 257 C. eDemographics 259 D. B2C eCommerce 263 E. B2B eCommerce 265 F.eFinance 266 G. eWireless 267 XII Norway 269 A. Overview 270 B. Internet Users 271 C. eDemographics 273 D. B2C eCommerce 276 E. B2B eCommerce 277 F.eWireless 278 XIII Poland 279 A. Overview 280 B. Internet Users 281 C. eDemographics 282 D. B2C eCommerce 289 E. B2B eCommerce 290 F.eWireless 291 XIV Russia 295 A. Overview 296 B. Internet Users 297 C. eDemographics 299 D. B2C eCommerce 301 E. B2B eCommerce 305 F.eWireless 306 XV Spain 309 A. Overview 310 5 ©2001 eMarketer, Inc. Reproduction of information sourced as eMarketer is prohibited without prior, written permission. Note: all data in this report (other than that sourced as eMarketer) was obtained from published, publicly available information. The eEurope Report B. Internet Users 311 C. eDemographics 312 D. B2C eCommerce 319 E. B2B eCommerce 321 F.eFinance 322 G. eWireless 324 XVI Sweden 327 A. Overview 328 B. Internet Users 329 C. eDemographics 330 D. B2C eCommerce 332 E. B2B eCommerce 334 F.eFinance 335 G. eWireless 336 XVII United Kingdom 341 A. Overview 342 B. Internet Users 343 C. eDemographics 345 D. B2C eCommerce 353 E. B2B eCommerce 357 F.eFinance 358 G. eAdvertising 361 H. eWireless 363 Index of Charts 367 6 ©2001 eMarketer, Inc. Reproduction of information sourced as eMarketer is prohibited without prior, written permission. Note: all data in this report (other than that sourced as eMarketer) was obtained from published, publicly available information. The eEurope Report April 2001 Welcome to eMarketer Dear Reader: Nevin Cohen eMarketer’s March 2001 eEurope Report™ offers the most comprehensive and accurate picture Senior Analyst, Europe [email protected] available of the internet and e-commerce development in this exciting region of the globe. Prepared by our eEurope analyst Nevin Cohen, along with the eMarketer analyst and research team, eMarketer, inc. this report is a valuable reference tool for tracking the internet market in Western and Eastern Europe. 821 Broadway New York, NY 10003 It provides critical data and insights to develop business and marketing plans, create presentations, T: 212.677.6300 answer vital, “need-to-know-now” questions and make informed decisions about online ventures. F: 212.777.1172 Presenting statistical information from a wide range of authoritative research sources, the eEurope Report™ provides quick answers to hundreds of questions, such as: I How many people will be using the internet in Europe? I What are their preferred online activities? I Which country has the highest internet penetration rate? I How fast is e-commerce growing in France? In Germany? In Russia? I How many people subscribe to wireless services and what is the future of the wireless internet in Europe? I What are the major trends in the online advertising market? If you have any questions or comments concerning eMarketer or any of the material in this report, please call, fax or e-mail us. Nevin Cohen eEurope Analyst Learn more about eEurope at www.eMarketer.com and receive a free weekly e-mail newsletter with the latest news, research and analysis. Written by Nevin Cohen Also contributing to this report: Reuse of information in this document, without prior authorization, Noah Elkin, Senior Analyst is prohibited. If you would like to license this report for your Darren Allen, Senior Analyst organization, please contact David Iankelevich at Paul Mulligan, Senior Analyst [email protected], or 212.677.6300 ext 213. Claudine Thompson, Senior Analyst Yael Marmon, Researcher Mustafa Sakarya, Researcher Marius Meland, Editor Pascale Gabbey, Copyeditor Dana Hill, Production Artist Terry King, Production Artist 7 ©2001 eMarketer, Inc. Reproduction of information sourced as eMarketer is prohibited without prior, written permission. Note: all data in this report (other than that sourced as eMarketer) was obtained from published, publicly available information. The eEurope Report Methodology: The eMarketer Difference 9 I Economy,Infrastructure and Users II eCommerce III eAdvertising IV eFinance V eWireless VI Denmark VII Finland VIII France IX Germany X Italy XI The Netherlands XII Norway XIII Poland IX Russia XI Spain XII Sweden XII United Kingdom Index of Charts 9 ©2001 eMarketer, Inc. Reproduction of information sourced as eMarketer is prohibited without prior, written permission. Note: all data in this report (other than that sourced as eMarketer) was obtained from published, publicly available information. The eEurope Report Methodology Methodology: The eMarketer Difference Economy,Infrastructure, Users eCommerce eAdvertising eMarketer research is founded on a simple philosophy of aggregation: eFinance eWireless Denmark The key to approaching quantitative truth – particularly when Finland examining the internet marketplace – is to consider data from as many France reputable sources as possible. No one has all the answers. But taken Germany together, multiple sources, coupled with healthy doses of common Italy sense and business intelligence, create a reasonably accurate picture. The Netherlands Norway Poland eMarketer has no testing technique to protect, no research bias, and no Russia clients to please. The eMarketer research team begins each report by Spain examining research studies, surveys, and reports from hundreds of Sweden published, publicly available sources; we then filter, organize, and United Kingdom Index of Charts synthesize the information into tables, and graphs. Finally, we present the comparative source data along with our own analysis, estimates, and projections. As a result, each set of findings reflects the collected wisdom of numerous research firms and industry analysts. The benefits to our readers are threefold: I Information is more objective and comprehensive than that provided by any other single research source I Information is available in one place – easy to find, evaluate, and compare I Information can be quickly accessed to make intelligent, well- informed business decisions 10 ©2001 eMarketer, Inc. Reproduction of information sourced as eMarketer is prohibited without prior, written permission. Note: all data in this report (other than that sourced as eMarketer) was obtained from published, publicly available information. The eEurope Report Methodology: The eMarketer Difference I Economy, Infrastructure and Users 11 A. Population and Economy 12 B. Technology Infrastructure 18 C. Internet Users 40 I II eCommerce III eAdvertising IV eFinance V eWireless VI Denmark VII Finland VIII France IX Germany X Italy XI The Netherlands XII Norway XIII Poland XIV Russia XV Spain XVI Sweden XVII United Kingdom Index of Charts 11 ©2001 eMarketer, Inc. Reproduction of information sourced as eMarketer is prohibited without prior, written permission. Note: all data in this report (other than that sourced as eMarketer) was obtained from published, publicly available information. The eEurope Report Methodology A. Population and Economy Economy, Infrastructure, Users eCommerce The European economy grew steadily throughout 2000. GDP has increased eAdvertising at a rate of 3.6% according to PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) and 3.4% eFinance according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development eWireless Denmark (OECD). A central question is whether comparable growth rates can be Finland sustained in 2001. France The US is entering a period of slower economic growth that will put a Germany damper on European economic activity, resulting in a European growth Italy rate of approximately 3% in 2001, according to both PwC and the OECD. If, The Netherlands Norway as some economists fear, the US economy experiences a more severe Poland recession, or if oil prices rise and European business confidence falters, the Russia European economy may grow even more slowly, as the low estimates from Spain PwC indicate. Sweden An economic slowdown in Europe would hinder the growth of the United Kingdom Index of Charts region’s internet economy, drying up venture capital, making businesses more cautious about investing in new online ventures, and causing consumers to delay purchases of computers and internet-enabled devices.
Recommended publications
  • Filteren Van Kinderporno Op Internet

    Filteren Van Kinderporno Op Internet

    Filteren van kinderporno op internet Een verkenning van technieken en reguleringen in binnen- en buitenland W.Ph. Stol H.W.K. Kaspersen J. Kerstens E.R. Leukfeldt A.R. Lodder 26 mei 2008 Deze studie is uitgevoerd in opdracht van het WODC, ministerie van Justitie. Deze uitgave zal tevens verschijnen in de reeks Veiligheidsstudies van Boom Juridische Uit- gevers te Den Haag. Exemplaren kunnen worden besteld bij: Boom distributiecentrum te Meppel Tel. 0522-23 75 55 Fax 0522-25 38 64 E-mail [email protected] © 2008 WODC, ministerie van Justitie, auteursrecht voorbehouden Behoudens de in of krachtens de Auteurswet van 1912 gestelde uitzonderingen mag niets uit deze uit- gave worden verveelvoudigd, opgeslagen in een geautomatiseerd gegevensbestand, of openbaar ge- maakt, in enige vorm of op enige wijze, hetzij elektronisch, mechanisch, door fotokopieën, opnamen of enige andere manier, zonder voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van de uitgever. Voor zover het maken van reprografische verveelvoudigingen uit deze uitgave is toegestaan op grond van artikel 16h Auteurswet 1912 dient men de daarvoor wettelijk verschuldigde vergoedingen te voldoen aan de Stichting Reprorecht (Postbus 3060, 2130 KB Hoofddorp, www.reprorecht.nl). Voor het overnemen van (een) gedeelte(n) uit deze uitgave in bloemlezingen, readers en andere compilatiewerken (art. 16 Auteurswet 1912) kan men zich wenden tot de Stichting PRO (Stichting Publicatie - en Reproductie- rechten Organisatie, Postbus 3060, 2130 KB Hoofddorp, www.cedar.nl/pro). No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, photoprint, microfilm or any other means without written permission from the publisher. Filteren van kinderporno op internet Een verkenning van technieken en reguleringen in binnen- en buitenland Noordelijke Hogeschool Leeuwarden Lectoraat Integrale Veiligheid Vrije Universiteit Instituut voor Informatica en Recht W.Ph.
  • What to Know and Where to Go

    What to Know and Where to Go

    What to Know and Where to Go A Practical Guide for International Students at the Faculty of Science CONTENT 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................8 2. WHO TO CONTACT? ................................................................................................................................................ 9 FULL-DEGREE STUDENTS: ......................................................................................................................................9 GUEST/EXCHANGE STUDENTS: ........................................................................................................................... 10 3. ACADEMIC CALENDAR AND TIMETABLE GROUPS .................................................................................... 13 NORMAL TEACHING BLOCKS ........................................................................................................................................ 13 GUIDANCE WEEK ......................................................................................................................................................... 13 THE SUMMER PERIOD ................................................................................................................................................... 13 THE 2009/2010 ACADEMIC YEAR ................................................................................................................................. 14 HOLIDAYS & PUBLIC
  • Network-Political Resiliency

    Network-Political Resiliency

    Network-Political Resiliency A Classification of Internet Resiliency by Country Chloe Reynolds & Saghar Tamaddon Network-Political Resiliency 2 Abstract Recent Internet disruptions in Libya, Egypt, Syria, Burma and Nepal beg the question, “How vulnerable is any country to an Internet access disruption by its government?” This paper seeks to answer that question by taking a look at both internet infrastructure and politics to create a „Network-Political Resiliency‟ (NPR) classification. The network infrastructure metric for each country is based on Roberts and Larochelle‟s (2010) number of „Points of Control‟ (POCs). POCs are the most influential Autonomous Systems (ASs) in a country‟s Internet network. Roberts and Larochelle determined the POCs based on a new AS relationship inference method, applied to data from The Cooperative Association for Internet Data Analysis (CAIDA). Three different political metrics are used, gathered from two sources: a) OpenNet Initiative‟s Political Internet Filtering score (see map in Appendix 2), b) OpenNet Initiative‟s overall Internet Filtering score, and c) Reporters Without Borders‟ Internet Enemies Report (see map in Appendix 3). The combination of these metrics results in a final NPR classification. In short, only a small portion of countries has a "high" NPR classification, and most fall into the low and very low resiliency categories. Given that Internet access is felt by many to be a matter of human rights, national NPR levels can be a red flag for concerned entities, such as human rights organizations. NPR ratings can also serve as a call for increasing network infrastructure. Network-Political Resiliency 3 Political Infrastructure of the Internet Proponents of open Internet access and net neutrality argue that unfiltered widely and freely available Internet access is a democratization tool (Reporters Without Borders, 2011).
  • Convergence in Action: a Case Study of the Norwegian Internet

    Convergence in Action: a Case Study of the Norwegian Internet

    Telematics and Informatics 33 (2016) 641–649 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Telematics and Informatics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tele Research In Brief Convergence in action: A case study of the Norwegian Internet ⇑ Hanne Kristine Hallingby a,b, , Gjermund Hartviksen a,1, Silvia Elaluf-Calderwood c, Carsten Sørensen d a Telenor Research, Snarøyveien 30, 1331 Fornebu, Norway b University of Oslo, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, Eilert Sundts hus, Moltke Moes vei 31, 0851 Oslo, Norway c The London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Management, The Information Systems & Innovation Group, New Academic Building, 5th Floor, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom d The London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Management, The Information Systems & Innovation Group, New Academic Building, 3rd Floor, Room 3.11, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom article info abstract Article history: The conceptual framework for understanding the logical Internet is based on the construc- Received 7 August 2014 tion of a horizontal, layered architecture, which differentiates between physical-, data Received in revised form 19 January 2015 link-, network-, transport-, and application layers (Woodard and Baldwin, 2008). This is Accepted 19 August 2015 different from the telecommunication networks model where a new service traditionally Available online 28 August 2015 used to require new network architecture to be established (Yoo, 2012). However, the digitalization of services and products offered over the telecom infrastructure allows us Keywords: to observe an emergent phenomenon of increased vertical integration on the Internet as Convergence well as the creation of further service specialization opportunities for telecom operators Modularity Internet and users (Liebenau et al., 2011).
  • RIPE NCC Survey 2013: Full Statistics and Responses to Open Questions

    RIPE NCC Survey 2013: Full Statistics and Responses to Open Questions

    RIPE NCC Survey 2013 September 9, 2013 Appendix 3: Full Statistics and Responses to Open Questions RIPE NCC SURVEY 2013 Q1 Please choose your country Answered: 3,631 Skipped: 2 Answer Choices Responses Afghanistan 0.03% 1 Åland Islands 0.06% 2 Albania 0.52% 19 Algeria 0.03% 1 American Samoa 0% 0 Andorra 0.08% 3 Angola 0% 0 Anguilla 0% 0 Antarctica 0% 0 Antigua and Barbuda 0% 0 Argentina 0.06% 2 Armenia 0.22% 8 Aruba 0% 0 Australia 0.25% 9 Austria 2.09% 76 Azerbaijan 0.14% 5 Bahamas 0% 0 Bahrain 0.22% 8 Bangladesh 0.08% 3 Barbados 0% 0 Belarus 0.25% 9 Belgium 1.51% 55 Belize 0% 0 Benin 0% 0 Bermuda 0.03% 1 Bhutan 0.03% 1 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 0% 0 Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba 0% 0 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.41% 15 Botswana 0% 0 Bouvet Island 0% 0 Brazil 0.08% 3 British Indian Ocean Territory 0% 0 Brunei Darussalam 0% 0 Bulgaria 1.05% 38 Burkina Faso 0% 0 Burundi 0% 0 1 / 231 RIPE NCC SURVEY 2013 0% 0 Cambodia Cameroon 0% 0 Canada 0.33% 12 Cape Verde 0% 0 Cayman Islands 0% 0 Central African Republic 0% 0 Chad 0% 0 Chile 0.06% 2 China 0.11% 4 Christmas Island 0% 0 Cocos (Keeling) Islands 0% 0 Colombia 0.03% 1 Comoros 0% 0 Congo 0% 0 Congo, the Democratic Republic of the 0% 0 Cook Islands 0% 0 Costa Rica 0% 0 Côte d'Ivoire 0% 0 Croatia 0.63% 23 Cuba 0% 0 Curaçao 0% 0 Cyprus 0.19% 7 Czech Republic 2.64% 96 Denmark 1.96% 71 Djibouti 0% 0 Dominica 0% 0 Dominican Republic 0% 0 Ecuador 0.03% 1 Egypt 0.11% 4 El Salvador 0% 0 Equatorial Guinea 0% 0 Eritrea 0% 0 Estonia 0.47% 17 Ethiopia 0% 0 Falkland Islands (Malvinas) 0% 0 Faroe Islands
  • The Annual Report 2002 Documents Telenor's Strong Position in the Norwegian Market, an Enhanced Capacity to Deliver in The

    The Annual Report 2002 Documents Telenor's Strong Position in the Norwegian Market, an Enhanced Capacity to Deliver in The

    The Annual Report 2002 documents Telenor’s strong position in the Norwegian market, an enhanced capacity to deliver in the Nordic market and a developed position as an international mobile communications company. With its modern communications solutions, Telenor simplifies daily life for more than 15 million customers. TELENOR Telenor – internationalisation and growth 2 Positioned for growth – Interview with CEO Jon Fredrik Baksaas 6 Telenor in 2002 8 FINANCIAL REVIEW THE ANNUAL REPORT Operating and financial review and prospects 50 Directors’ Report 2002 10 Telenor’s Corporate Governance 18 Financial Statements Telenor’s Board of Directors 20 Statement of profit and loss – Telenor Group 72 Telenor’s Group Management 22 Balance sheet – Telenor Group 73 Cash flow statement – Telenor Group 74 VISION 24 Equity – Telenor Group 75 Accounting principles – Telenor Group 76 OPERATIONS Notes to the financial statements – Telenor Group 80 Activities and value creation 34 Accounts – Telenor ASA 120 Telenor Mobile 38 Auditor’s report 13 1 Telenor Networks 42 Statement from the corporate assembly of Telenor 13 1 Telenor Plus 44 Telenor Business Solutions 46 SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION Other activities 48 Shareholder information 134 MARKET INFORMATION 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 MOBILE COMMUNICATION Norway Mobile subscriptions (NMT + GSM) (000s) 2,382 2,307 2,199 1,950 1,552 GSM subscriptions (000s) 2,330 2,237 2,056 1,735 1,260 – of which prepaid (000s) 1,115 1,027 911 732 316 Revenue per GSM subscription per month (ARPU)1) 346 340 338 341 366 Traffic minutes
  • A Webarchiválás Válogatott Bibliográfiája Összefoglalókkal

    A Webarchiválás Válogatott Bibliográfiája Összefoglalókkal

    A webarchiválás válogatott bibliográfiája összefoglalókkal Szerkeszti: Németh Márton <[email protected]> Frissítés dátuma: 2018.09.11. Beinert, T. (2017). Webarchivierung an der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek. (German). Web Archiving at the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek. (English) , 51 (6), 490. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,cookie,cpid&custid=s6213251&gro upid=main&profile=eds The Bayerische Staatsbibliothek has been collecting and archiving websites dealing with regional studies and science since the year 2010. The article provides a survey of the collection and archiving profiles of the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek concerning websites, the legal basis, the workflow which has been developed as well as the registration and making available of websites in the archives. Finally, further perspectives for the future are presented. (English) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Boruna, A. E., & Rahme, N. (2011). Arhivarea paginilor Web – ini ţiative relevante de păstrare a patrimoniului digital european. Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei. Informare si Documentare , 4, 39–52,. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1443688144?accountid=27464 Brakker, N. V., & Kujbyshev, L. A. (2013). The Experience of the National Libraries Abroad of the Collection and Longterm Preservation of Internet Resources. Bibliotekovedenie [Library and Information Science (Russia)] , (2), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.25281/0869- 608X-2013-0-2-88-96 A review of National Libraries experience of WEB harvesting, archiving technologies and legal issues. The paper suggests an overlook of experience and experiments of National Libraries of Austria, Germany, China, Lithuania, the Netherlands, New Zeeland, Northway, Portugal, United Kingdom, USA, Finland, France, Czech Republic and Sweden. Buel, J. W. (2018). Assembling the Living Archive: A Media-Archaeological Excavation of Occupy Wall Street.
  • Icts and Gender-Evidence from OECD and Non OECD Countries

    Icts and Gender-Evidence from OECD and Non OECD Countries

    OECD expert meeting hosted by the Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research Oslo, Norway 2-3 June 2008 ICTs and Gender Pierre Montagnier 1 Conceptual framework Focus of this presentation ECONOMY CONSUMPTION ICT demand Households Business Government ICT uptake ICT intensity ICT skills ICT infrastructure ICT supply PRODUCTIVE CAPACITY Labour Capital Source: Adapted from OECD, Guide to Measuring the Information Society (2005), and ORBICOM, Monitoring the Digital Divide… and Beyond (2003). 2 Share of women in ICT using occupations1, selected OECD countries, 2004 (% of total ICT-skilled occupations) Clerical Other 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Italy Poland Ireland Spain Finland France Iceland NorwayBelgium GreecePortugal Hungary Sweden Denmark Germany Austria (2) SwitzerlandNetherlands United States Luxembourg Czech RepublicSlovak Republic United Kingdom 1. Broad definition based on methodology described in OECD 2004 Information Technology Outlook, van Welsum and Vickery (2005) and van Welsum and Reif (2006). 2. 2003 instead of 2004. 3 Source: OECD OECD, based on EULFS and US Current Population Survey. Share of women computing professionals1, selected OECD countries, 1998 and 2004 percentage (%) 1998 2004 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Italy Spain France Poland FinlandGreeceIcelandSweden Portugal HungaryNorway Belgium Ireland (2) Denmark Germany Austria (3) LuxembourgSwitzerlandNetherlands Slovak Republic United Kingdom Czech Republic 1. Computing Professional = ISCO 88 category code 213 2. 1999 instead of 1998. 3. 2003 instead of 2004. 4 Source: OECD, based on data from Eurostat, Newcronos database, 2006. Share of women in selected ICT industries1 in selected OECD countries, 2004 percentage EU countries2, 2004 Korea, 2003 United States3, 2004 (%) (%) (%) 40 40 40 35 35 35 30 30 30 25 25 25 20 20 20 15 15 15 10 10 10 5 5 5 0 0 0 3341 30 32 64 72 30 32 64 72 515+5171 518+5415 3342+3343 ISIC rev.3.1 ISIC rev.3.1 NAICS 2002 1.
  • 11583/12 ADD 3 HVW/Ek 1 DG E 2B COUNCIL of the EUROPEAN

    11583/12 ADD 3 HVW/Ek 1 DG E 2B COUNCIL of the EUROPEAN

    COUNCIL OF Brussels, 19 June 2012 THE EUROPEAN UNION 11583/12 ADD 2 TELECOM 129 AUDIO 67 COMPET 455 RECH 293 MI 445 ENER 322 DATAPROTECT 79 COVER NOTE from: Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director date of receipt: 18 June 2012 to: Mr Uwe CORSEPIUS, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Unio n No Cion doc.: SWD(2012) 180 final Subject: COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT "DAE - Scoreboard 2012" (Vol 3/6) Delegations will find attached Commission document SWD(2012) 180 final. (Vol. 3/6) ________________________ Enc l. : SWD(2012) 180 final 11583/12 ADD 3 HVW/ek 1 DG E 2B EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 18.6.2012 SWD(2012) 180 final Vol. 3/6 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT DAE-Scoreboard 2012 EN EN COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT DAE-Scoreboard 2012 EN 2 EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information Society and Media Directorate-General Elec tronic Communications Policy Implementation of Regulatory Framework 18 June 2012 EUROPEAN UNION 2011 Telecommunication Market and Regulatory Developments EN 3 EN This report is a Commission Services working document, issued as part of the Scoreboard 2012: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/digital-agenda/scoreboard/ Address : Commission européenne / Europes e Commissie, B-1049 Bruxelles / Brussel Email : [email protected] EN 4 EN 2011 Telecommunications Market & Regulatory Developments TABLE OF CONTENT 1. STATE OF TR ANSPOSITION OF THE R EVISED EU FR AMEWORK ________ 7 2. NATIONAL REGULATORY AUTHORITIES (NRA) __________________________ 9 2.1. Independence and organisation __________________________________________ 9 2.2. Resources and capacity/administrative charges ____________________________ 10 2.3.
  • Territorialization of the Internet Domain Name System

    Territorialization of the Internet Domain Name System

    Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Boyd Law Scholarly Works Faculty Scholarship 2018 Territorialization of the Internet Domain Name System Marketa Trimble University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, International Law Commons, and the Internet Law Commons Recommended Citation Trimble, Marketa, "Territorialization of the Internet Domain Name System" (2018). Scholarly Works. 1020. https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub/1020 This Article is brought to you by the Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Boyd Law, an institutional repository administered by the Wiener-Rogers Law Library at the William S. Boyd School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Territorialization of the Internet Domain Name System Marketa Trimble* Abstract Territorializationof the internet-the linking of the internet to physical geography is a growing trend. Internet users have become accustomed to the conveniences of localized advertising, have enjoyed location-based services, and have witnessed an increasing use of geolocation and geo- blocking tools by service and content providers who for various reasons- either allow or block access to internet content based on users' physical locations. This article analyzes whether, and if so how, the trend toward territorializationhas affected the internetDomain Name System (DNS). As a hallmark of cyberspace governance that aimed to be detached from the territorially-partitionedgovernance of the physical world, the DNS might have been expected to resist territorialization-a design that seems antithetical to the original design of and intent for the internet as a globally distributed network that lacks a single point of control.
  • Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/CISP(2009)9/FINAL

    Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/CISP(2009)9/FINAL

    Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/CISP(2009)9/FINAL Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 23-Mar-2010 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ English - Or. English DIRECTORATE FOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY COMMITTEE FOR INFORMATION, COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS POLICY Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/CISP(2009)9/FINAL Working Party on Communication Infrastructures and Services Policy DEVELOPMENTS IN CABLE BROADBAND NETWORKS English - Or. English JT03280592 Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format DSTI\ICCP\CISP(2009)9/FINAL FOREWORD The Working Party on Communication Infrastructures and Services Policy (CISP) discussed this report at its meeting in December 2009. CISP agreed to forward the document for declassification by the Committee for Information, Computer and Communications Policy (ICCP). The ICCP Committee agreed to make the report public in March 2010. The report was prepared by Mr. Hyun-Cheol CHUNG of the OECD’s Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. It is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. © OECD 2010/OCDE 2010 2 DSTI\ICCP\CISP(2009)9/FINAL MAIN FINDINGS The position of cable operators within the pay TV market has changed drastically in recent years. Although video service remains core to the cable industry’s business model, cable TV’s market share has been dropping significantly with intense competition from direct broadcast satellite services (DBS), Internet protocol Television (IPTV) services, digital terrestrial television services (DTT) and finally from over-the-top (OTT) service providers that supply video over an existing data connection from a third party.
  • Diffusion and Impacts of the Internet and E-Commerce: the Case of Denmark

    Diffusion and Impacts of the Internet and E-Commerce: the Case of Denmark

    Diffusion and Impacts of the Internet and E-Commerce: The Case of Denmark August 2004 NIELS BJØRN-ANDERSEN KIM VIBORG ANDERSEN Center for E-Commerce Copenhagen Business School, Denmark E-mail: {nba, andersen}@cbs.dk Please refer all correspondence about this paper to [email protected] This research is a part of the Globalization and E-Commerce project of the Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations (CRITO) at the University of California, Irvine. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0085852. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. ______________________________________________________________________________ Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations University of California, Irvine | www.crito.uci.edu ABSTRACT Danish companies are ahead of those in the U.S. in B2C e-commerce. With the exception of Germany, Denmark is leading the group of 10 countries included in the globalization of e- commerce survey data, forming the basis for this report. Yet the surveyed countries are performing substantially better than Denmark in B2B online sales. Danish companies have high levels of investment in IT, the lowest barriers for e-commerce, and the highest levels of e-commerce drivers. Most indicators for e-commerce readiness, such as use of e-mail, intranet, EDI, extranet, and the provision of mobile services, show that the Danish business sector has adopted the technologies that foster e-commerce development. Yet our analysis also points to several alarming and surprising findings.