Upholding a Modernist Mentality
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Upholding a Modernist Mentality Experimentalism and Neo-tonality in the Symphonies of Einojuhani Rautavaara Owen Burton PhD University of York Music March 2020 1 2 Abstract Einojuhani Rautavaara (1928-2016) is one of the most significant Finnish composers to emerge after Sibelius, and his music has been highly acclaimed for its originality and accessibility. After experimenting with modernism in the 1960s, his more approachable recent style has often been misunderstood. This thesis will consider this music, and re- consider terms describing it, such as “mystical”, “neo-Romantic” and “postmodern”, which are used in a variety of music criticism and in some biographical accounts. As such, it offers a new understanding of Rautavaara’s idiom, its larger significance, and its relationship with broader, historical trends within the Long Twentieth Century. This thesis addresses the larger, integrated role of modernism in Rautavaara’s music within the multi-stylistic context of contemporary composition. Modernism is examined both in technical, stylistic terms as well as a more general mentality of progress, arguing that both definitions have informed Rautavaara’s recent music more than has been acknowledged. After considering modernism in its broadest terms and in the more specific Finnish context, the thesis draws on the concepts of “reactive modernism” (J.P.E. Harper- Scott) and the “moderate mainstream” (Arnold Whittall) to argue that, in the late-twentieth century, Rautavaara continues an individualistic, critical approach that did not reject either “modern” or “anachronistic” techniques. Musical analyses focussing on the eight symphonies, several of which have received no previous detailed discussion, support a new contextualisation of Rautavaara’s entire symphonic cycle as a major pillar of his output. These analytical chapters work inwards from differing experiences of global form, to surface-level thematic processes, to melodic and harmonic processes, in particular how Rautavaara reconciles dodecaphonic and tonal thinking. Issues of symmetry and duality occur throughout. From these close readings, contextual discussion assesses Rautavaara’s legacy, focusing on his mentorship of younger Finnish composers, as well as determining common and recurring compositional features. 3 Contents Abstract……………………...……………………………………………………………………………3 Contents………………………………………………………………………………………..4 List of examples………………………………………………………………………………..8 Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………….………...13 Author’s declaration................................................................................................................14 1 Contexts and approaches.…………………………………………….....17 Aims and approaches……………………………………………………………18 Relationship to previous literature……………………………………….…….19 A symphonic focus……………………………………………………………………...22 Analytical counterparts………………………………………………………………..22 Approaching modernism…………………………………….………………......23 Moderate modernism in the late-twentieth century…………….……….………25 A dialectical view………………………………………………………………………30 Finnish musical modernism…………………………………………………….32 Three waves of Finnish modernism………………………………………………....33 The Symphony in Finland……………………………………………………………..36 2 Rautavaara’s stylistic features and compositional mentality…………40 Rautavaara and the symphony…………………………………………………..40 Serialism………………………………………………………………………...43 A 12-tone vocabulary…………………………………………………………...45 Symmetry…………………………………………………………….………….46 Neo-tonality……………………………………………………………………..54 Aleatoric writing…………………………………………………………….......57 Mysticism and accessibility……………………………………………………..58 A taste for the infinite……………………………………………………….......61 The rise of the individual………………………………………………………..62 3 Journeying in symphonic form…………………………………………63 Re-asserting linearity……………………………………………………………64 The Spiral……………………………………………………………………….67 The Journey…………………………………………………………………......72 Departure……………………………………………………………………………….76 Progress and reflection………………………………………………………………..85 Towards the “ever-lasting sea”………………………………………………………86 Teleological significance……………………….……………………………….89 Journeys and spirals………………………………………………………...…..91 4 Moving forwards, looking back…………………………………………………92 4 Visual and spatial influences on form……………………….………….93 Cross-relations between music and visual influences……………………….......93 Musical paintings and non-linear narrative………………………………….......94 Paintings and the question of autonomy…………………………………………….98 Transitions and continuity………………………………………………………..….103 Memory and flux………………………………………………………………………108 Contrasting light………………………………………………………………..108 Opposition or cohesion?...................................................................................111 Imagery and genre…………………………………………………………………....114 Symphonic dialogue…………………………………………………………....115 5 Developing themes……………………………………………………....117 Themes and theory……………………………………………………………..117 Developing variation………………………………………………………………....117 Musical narrative…………………………………………………………………..…118 The process of “Becoming”………………………………………………………....119 Rautavaara and development…………………………………………………..120 Non-symphonic works……………………………………………………………..…115 The early symphonies……………………………………………………………..….121 The late symphonies……………………………………………………………..…...123 The movement of the sea…………………………………………………..…..124 Rhythm and motivic metamorphosis…………………………………………..……132 Reimagining Brucknerian symphonism…………………………………………....133 Melody and narrative…………………………………………………………..134 Processes of “becoming”…………………………………………………….....141 Motivic DNA………………………………………………………………………..…144 Developing themes…………………………………………………………..…146 6 Self-quotation and Rautavaara’s symphonies………………………...147 Musical “narcissism”?.........................................................................................147 Nature versus design…………………………………………………………...148 Self-quotation or similarity?.............................................................................. 151 “Fragmentos de Agonía” and Symphony No. 7………………………………..151 The Gift of the Magi and Symphony No. 7……………………………………..…..152 Canto IV and Symphony No. 7………………………………………………..…..…154 Compositional branches around Symphony No. 7………………...………...…159 Thomas and Symphony No. 5………………………………………………………..160 Thomas and Symphony No. 8………………………………………………………..162 5 A common root in opera……………………………………………………………..162 Repetition versus dynamism…………………………………………………………162 String Quintet No. 1 and Symphony No. 8…………….………..…………………164 Nirvana Dharma and Symphony No. 8………………………….……….………...165 Cancion de nuestro tiempo and Symphony No. 8…………………..………….....169 Symphony No. 3 and Angels and Visitations…………………..……………….....172 Contexts of musical borrowing………………………………………………...175 7 Continuations of dodecaphony…………………………………………178 An accessible network…………………………………………………………178 Symphonies and serialism……………………………………………………..179 Serialism and motivic development…………………………………………...182 Non-serial dodecaphony…………………………………………………….…186 Modal middleground…………………………………………………………..190 A kaleidoscopic view of harmony……………………………………………..194 Navigating harmonic vistas……………………………………………………199 The series returns……………………………………………………………...204 Modal dodecaphony…………………………………………………………...205 Rows as pigments……………………………………………………………...209 A new equilibrium……………………………………………………………..211 8 Neo-tonality and harmonic resonance………………………………...213 Terminology……………………………………………………………………214 Rautavaara and the piano…………………………………………………...….214 Harmony, sound properties and duration…………………………………...….215 Renewing the triad…………………………………………………………..…218 Pantonal voice leading………………………………………………………....221 Voice leading and serialism……………………………………………………..…..224 Voice leading and symmetry……………………………………………………..….229 Consonance and dissonance…………………………………………………....233 Harmonic “planing”………………………………………………………………....238 Perceptions of modality………………………………………………………..239 Non-tonal prolongation……………………………………………………..….242 Stasis and motion…………………………………………………………..…..245 Further limiting aleatoricism…………………………………………………..…...245 Journeying towards stasis…………………………………………………………...248 Harmonic resonance……………………………………………………………250 6 9 Rautavaara’s legacy…………………………………………………...252 Rautavaara as a teacher………………………………………………………...252 Paavo Heininen (b. 1938)………………………………………………………255 Dialectical processes…………………………………………………………………256 Kalevi Aho (b. 1949)…………………………………………………………...256 A prolific symphonist………………………………………………………………...257 Aho and modernism………………………………………………………………..…259 Continued vitality……………………………………………………………………..261 Magnus Lindberg (b. 1958)………………………………………………….....261 Lindberg and modernism…………………………………………………………....263 Symphonic inheritance……………………………………………………………….265 Stylistic similarities………………………………………………………………..…268 Saying different things in the same way…………………………………………...275 Esa-Pekka Salonen (b. 1958)…………………………………………………..275 Conductor or composer?..................................................................................276 Salonen and modernism……………………………………………………………...276 ‘Deep’ formal processes…………………………………………………………..…278 Visual elements……………………………………………………………………..…282 Beyond dogma………………………………………………………………………...285 Renewable revolutionaries…………………………………………………..…285 10 Conclusions……………………………………………………………..287 An original composer…………………………………………………………..288 Belief in symphonic writing……………………………………………………290 Modernist or postmodernist?..............................................................................290 Saturation point………………………………………………………………...293 Some suggestions for future research…………………………….……………295 List of primary sources..………...…………………………………………………………………296