DOCSLIB.ORG

(Walleye) Pollock Mid-Water Trawl PCDR

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Walleye) Pollock Mid-Water Trawl PCDR UCSL United Certification Systems Limited: East Kamchatka Alaska (Walleye) pollock mid-water trawl PCDR Marine Stewardship Council fisheries assessments UCSL – United Certification Systems Limited Office 003, Pamelva Court, 1 Anastasi Shoukri Street, 3035, Limassol, Cyprus Mobile phone: +7-960-242-4845 Email: [email protected] Website: https://ucsl.eu/ Website: https://ucsl.eu/ East Kamchatka Alaska (Walleye) pollock mid-water trawl Photo from website: https://skurilsk.ru/news/skurilsk/153621/ (© Sakhalin.Info, 2018) Public Comment Draft Report Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) UCSL United Certification Systems Limited Assessment team Steven Nelson, Dr. Giuseppe Scarcella, Dr. Mohamed Samy-Kamal Fishery client PCA – Pollock Catchers Association (Russian Federation) Assessment type Initial Assessment Date June 2021 MSC FCP 2.2 Template CRV2 Page 1 of 229 UCSL UCSL United Certification Systems Limited: East Kamchatka Alaska (Walleye) pollock mid-water trawl PCDR Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Table of Tables ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Table of Figures ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Glossary ............................................................................................................................................................. 9 List of symbols and reference points.............................................................................................................. 10 1 Executive summary ................................................................................................................................. 11 2 Report details .......................................................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Authorship and peer review details................................................................................................ 12 2.2 Version details................................................................................................................................. 14 3 Unit(s) of Assessment and Unit(s) of Certification ................................................................................ 15 3.1 Unit(s) of Assessment and Unit(s) of Certification ........................................................................ 15 3.1.1 Unit(s) of Assessment ................................................................................................................... 15 3.1.2 Unit(s) of Certification .................................................................................................................... 16 3.1.3 Scope of assessment in relation to enhanced or introduced fisheries ............................................. 16 3.2 Assessment results overview......................................................................................................... 17 3.2.1 Determination, formal conclusion, and agreement ......................................................................... 17 3.2.2 Principle level scores ..................................................................................................................... 17 3.2.3 Summary of conditions .................................................................................................................. 18 3.2.4 Recommendations ........................................................................................................................ 18 4 Traceability and eligibility ....................................................................................................................... 19 4.1 Eligibility date .................................................................................................................................... 19 4.2 Traceability within the fishery ............................................................................................................. 19 4.3 Eligibility to enter further chains of custody ........................................................................................ 21 4.4 Eligibility of Inseparable or Practicably Inseparable (IPI) stock(s) to enter further chains of custody ... 21 5 Scoring .................................................................................................................................................... 22 5.1 Summary of Performance Indicator level scores .......................................................................... 22 6 Principle 1 ................................................................................................................................................ 23 6.1 Principle 1 background ................................................................................................................... 23 6.1.1 Spatial distribution and stock unit................................................................................................... 23 6.1.2 Life history traits of the target stock ............................................................................................... 27 6.1.3 History of the fishery and management .......................................................................................... 32 6.1.4 Data collection of target stock ........................................................................................................ 37 6.1.5 Stock assessment and TAC determination of the target stock ........................................................ 40 Catch profiles ............................................................................................................................................ 49 6.1.6 Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and catch data .................................................................................. 49 6.2 Principle 1 Performance Indicator scores and rationales ............................................................. 50 PI 1.1.1 – Stock status ....................................................................................................................................... 50 PI 1.1.2 – Stock rebuilding .................................................................................................................................. 52 PI 1.2.1 – Harvest strategy ................................................................................................................................. 53 PI 1.2.2 – Harvest control rules and tools ........................................................................................................... 56 PI 1.2.3 – Information and monitoring ................................................................................................................. 58 MSC FCP 2.2 Template CRV2 Page 2 of 229 UCSL UCSL United Certification Systems Limited: East Kamchatka Alaska (Walleye) pollock mid-water trawl PCDR PI 1.2.4 – Assessment of stock status ................................................................................................................ 61 7. Principle 2 ..................................................................................................................................................... 63 7.1 Principle 2 Background ....................................................................................................................... 63 7.1.1 Primary species ................................................................................................................................ 63 7.1.2 Secondary species ........................................................................................................................... 68 7.1.3 ETP species ..................................................................................................................................... 76 7.1.4. Habitat ............................................................................................................................................. 78 7.1.5 Ecosystem ........................................................................................................................................ 80 7.1.6. Scoring Element Table ..................................................................................................................... 84 7.2. Principle 2 Performance Indicator scores and rationales ................................................................. 85 PI 2.1.1 – Primary species outcome ................................................................................................................... 85 PI 2.1.2 – Primary species management strategy ............................................................................................... 87 PI 2.1.3 – Primary species information ............................................................................................................... 88 PI 2.2.1 – Secondary species outcome ............................................................................................................... 91 PI 2.2.2 – Secondary species management strategy .......................................................................................... 94 PI 2.2.3 – Secondary species information ..........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PICES Sci. Rep. No. 2, 1995
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FOREWORD vii Part 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN THE OKHOTSK SEA AND KURIL REGION 3 1.1 Okhotsk Sea water mass modification 3 1.1.1Dense shelf water formation in the northwestern Okhotsk Sea 3 1.1.2Soya Current study 4 1.1.3East Sakhalin Current and anticyclonic Kuril Basin flow 4 1.1.4West Kamchatka Current 5 1.1.5Tides and sea level in the Okhotsk Sea 5 1.2 Influence of Okhotsk Sea waters on the subarctic Pacific and Oyashio 6 1.2.1Kuril Island strait transports (Bussol', Kruzenshtern and shallower straits) 6 1.2.2Kuril region currents: the East Kamchatka Current, the Oyashio and large eddies 7 1.2.3NPIW transport and formation rate in the Mixed Water Region 7 1.3 Sea ice analysis and forecasting 8 2.0 PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS 9 2.1 Hydrographic observations (bottle and CTD) 9 2.2 Direct current observations in the Okhotsk and Kuril region 11 2.3 Sea level measurements 12 2.4 Sea ice observations 12 2.5 Satellite observations 12 Part 2. REVIEW OF OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE OKHOTSK SEA AND OYASHIO REGION 15 1.0 GEOGRAPHY AND PECULIARITIES OF THE OKHOTSK SEA 16 2.0 SEA ICE IN THE OKHOTSK SEA 17 2.1 Sea ice observations in the Okhotsk Sea 17 2.2 Ease of ice formation in the Okhotsk Sea 17 2.3 Seasonal and interannual variations of sea ice extent 19 2.3.1Gross features of the seasonal variation in the Okhotsk Sea 19 2.3.2Sea ice thickness 19 2.3.3Polynyas and open water 19 2.3.4Interannual variability 20 2.4 Sea ice off the coast of Hokkaido 21
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service V.53
    'I', . FISRES OF '!'RE GULF OF MAINE. 101 Description.-The hickory shad differs rather Bay, though it is found in practically all of them. noticeably from the sea herring in that the point This opens the interesting possibility that the of origin of its dorsal fin is considerably in front of "green" fish found in Chesapeake Bay, leave the the mid-length of its trunk; in its deep belly (a Bay, perhaps to spawn in salt water.65 hickory shad 13~ in. long is about 4 in. deep but a General range.-Atlantic coast of North America herring of that length is only 3 in. deep) ; in the fact from the Bay of Fundy to Florida. that its outline tapers toward both snout and tail Occurrence in the Gulf oj Maine.-The hickory in side view (fig. 15); and in that its lower jaw shad is a southern fish, with the Gulf of Maine as projects farther beyond the upper when its mouth the extreme northern limit to its range. It is is closed; also, by the saw-toothed edge of its belly. recorded in scientific literature only at North Also, it lacks the cluster of teeth on the roof of the· Truro; at Provincetown; at Brewster; in Boston mouth that is characteristic of the herring. One Harbor; off Portland; in Casco Ba3T; and from the is more likely to confuse a hickory shad with a shad mouth of the Bay of Fundy (Huntsman doubts or with the alewives, which it resembles in the this record), and it usually is so uncommon within position of its dorsal fin, in the great depth of its our limits that we have seen none in the Gulf body, in its saw-toothed belly and in the lack of ourselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of the Continental Slope Demersal Fish Community in the Colombian Caribbean – Deep-Sea Research in the Caribbean
    Andrea Polanco Fernández Dynamics of the continental slope demersal fish community in the Colombian Caribbean – Deep-sea research in the Caribbean DYNAMICS OF THE CONTINENTAL SLOPE DEMERSAL FISH COMMUNITY IN THE COLOMBIAN CARIBBEAN Deep-sea research in the Caribbean by Andrea Polanco F. A Dissertation Submitted to the DEPARTMENT OF MINES (Universidad Nacional de Colombia) and the DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY & CHEMISTRY (Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany) in Fulfillment of the Requirements for obtaining the Degree of DOCTOR IN MARINE SCIENCES at UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA (UNal) and DOCTOR RER. NAT. at THE JUSTUS-LIEBIG-UNIVERSITY GIESSEN (UniGiessen) 2015 Deans: Prof. Dr. John William Branch Bedoya (Unal) Prof. Dr. Holger Zorn (UniGiessen) Advisors: Prof. Dr. Arturo Acero Pizarro (Unal) Prof. Dr. Thomas Wilke (UniGiessen) Andrea Polanco F. (2014) Dynamics of the continental slope demersal fish community in the Colombian Caribbean - Deep-sea research in the Caribbean. This dissertation has been submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for a cotutelled advanced degree at the Universidad Nacional de Colombia (UNal) and the Justus Liebig University of Giessen adviced by Professor Arturo Acero (UNal) and Professor Thomas Wilke (UniGiessen). A mi familia y al mar… mi vida! To my family and to the sea….. my life! Después de esto, jamás volveré a mirar el mar de la misma manera… Ahora, como un pez en el agua… rodeado de inmensidad y libertad. After this, I will never look again the sea in the same way Now, as a fish in the sea… surounded of inmensity and freedom. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................. I TABLE OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ©Copyright 2011 Stephen Colby Phillips
    ©Copyright 2011 Stephen Colby Phillips Networked Glass: Lithic Raw Material Consumption and Social Networks in the Kuril Islands, Far Eastern Russia Stephen Colby Phillips A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2011 Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Anthropology University of Washington Abstract Networked Glass: Lithic Raw Material Consumption and Social Networks in the Kuril Islands, Far Eastern Russia Stephen Colby Phillips Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Associate Professor J. Benjamin Fitzhugh Anthropology This research assesses the effects of environmental conditions on the strategic decisions of low-density foragers in regards to their stone tool raw material procurement and consumption behavior. Social as well as technological adaptations allow human groups to meet the challenges of environments that are circumscribed due to geographic isolation, low biodiversity, and the potential impacts of natural events. Efficient resource management and participation in social networks can be viewed within the framework of human behavioral ecology as optimal forms of behavior aimed at increasing the chances of successful adaptations to dynamic island environments. A lithic resource consumption behavioral model is constructed and predictions derived from the model are tested through the analysis of lithic flake debitage from artifact assemblages representing 2,100 years of human occupation in the Kuril Islands of Far Eastern Russia in the North Pacific Ocean. The relative proportions of debitage across lithic reduction sequence stages provides a measure of lithic reduction intensity, which is compared with the model predictions based on the environmental conditions and local availability of lithic resources in six archaeological sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory and Atlas of Corals and Coral Reefs, with Emphasis on Deep-Water Coral Reefs from the U
    Inventory and Atlas of Corals and Coral Reefs, with Emphasis on Deep-Water Coral Reefs from the U. S. Caribbean EEZ Jorge R. García Sais SEDAR26-RD-02 FINAL REPORT Inventory and Atlas of Corals and Coral Reefs, with Emphasis on Deep-Water Coral Reefs from the U. S. Caribbean EEZ Submitted to the: Caribbean Fishery Management Council San Juan, Puerto Rico By: Dr. Jorge R. García Sais dba Reef Surveys P. O. Box 3015;Lajas, P. R. 00667 [email protected] December, 2005 i Table of Contents Page I. Executive Summary 1 II. Introduction 4 III. Study Objectives 7 IV. Methods 8 A. Recuperation of Historical Data 8 B. Atlas map of deep reefs of PR and the USVI 11 C. Field Study at Isla Desecheo, PR 12 1. Sessile-Benthic Communities 12 2. Fishes and Motile Megabenthic Invertebrates 13 3. Statistical Analyses 15 V. Results and Discussion 15 A. Literature Review 15 1. Historical Overview 15 2. Recent Investigations 22 B. Geographical Distribution and Physical Characteristics 36 of Deep Reef Systems of Puerto Rico and the U. S. Virgin Islands C. Taxonomic Characterization of Sessile-Benthic 49 Communities Associated With Deep Sea Habitats of Puerto Rico and the U. S. Virgin Islands 1. Benthic Algae 49 2. Sponges (Phylum Porifera) 53 3. Corals (Phylum Cnidaria: Scleractinia 57 and Antipatharia) 4. Gorgonians (Sub-Class Octocorallia 65 D. Taxonomic Characterization of Sessile-Benthic Communities 68 Associated with Deep Sea Habitats of Puerto Rico and the U. S. Virgin Islands 1. Echinoderms 68 2. Decapod Crustaceans 72 3. Mollusks 78 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf/47/3/446/5370666/S0094837321000026a.Pdf by Guest on 25 September 2021 the RISE to DOMINANCE of LANTERNFISHES 447
    Paleobiology, 47(3), 2021, pp. 446–463 DOI: 10.1017/pab.2021.2 Article The rise to dominance of lanternfishes (Teleostei: Myctophidae) in the oceanic ecosystems: a paleontological perspective Werner Schwarzhans* and Giorgio Carnevale Abstract.—Lanternfishes currently represent one of the dominant groups of mesopelagic fishes in terms of abundance, biomass, and diversity. Their otolith record dominates pelagic sediments below 200 m in dredges, especially during the entire Neogene. Here we provide an analysis of their diversity and rise to dominance primarily based on their otolith record. The earliest unambiguous fossil myctophids are known based on otoliths from the late Paleocene and early Eocene. During their early evolutionary history, myctophids were likely not adapted to a high oceanic lifestyle but occurred over shelf and upper-slope regions, where they were locally abundant during the middle Eocene. A distinct upscaling in otolith size is observed in the early Oligocene, which also marks their earliest occurrence in bathyal sediments. We interpret this transition to be related to the change from a halothermal deep-ocean circulation to a thermohaline regime and the associated cooling of the deep ocean and rearrangement of nutrient and sil- ica supply. The early Oligocene myctophid size acme shows a remarkable congruence with diatom abun- dance, the main food resource for the zooplankton and thus for myctophids and whales. The warmer late Oligocene to early middle Miocene period was characterized by an increase in disparity of myctophids but with a reduction in their otolith sizes. A second and persisting secular pulse in myctophid diversity (particularly within the genus Diaphus) and increase in size begins with the “biogenic bloom” in the late Miocene, paralleled with diatom abundance and mysticete gigantism.
    [Show full text]
  • Tidally Modified Western Boundary Current Drives Interbasin Exchange
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Tidally modifed western boundary current drives interbasin exchange between the Sea of Okhotsk and the North Pacifc Hung‑Wei Shu1,2*, Humio Mitsudera1, Kaihe Yamazaki2,3, Tomohiro Nakamura1, Takao Kawasaki4, Takuya Nakanowatari5, Hatsumi Nishikawa1,4 & Hideharu Sasaki6 The interbasin exchange between the Sea of Okhotsk and the North Pacifc governs the intermediate water ventilation and fertilization of the nutrient‑rich subpolar Pacifc, and thus has an enormous infuence on the North Pacifc. However, the mechanism of this exchange is puzzling; current studies have not explained how the western boundary current (WBC) of the subarctic North Pacifc intrudes only partially into the Sea of Okhotsk. High‑resolution models often exhibit unrealistically small exchanges, as the WBC overshoots passing by deep straits and does not induce exchange fows. Therefore, partial intrusion cannot be solely explained by large‑scale, wind‑driven circulation. Here, we demonstrate that tidal forcing is the missing mechanism that drives the exchange by steering the WBC pathway. Upstream of the deep straits, tidally‑generated topographically trapped waves over a bank lead to cross‑slope upwelling. This upwelling enhances bottom pressure, thereby steering the WBC pathway toward the deep straits. The upwelling is identifed as the source of joint‑efect‑of‑ baroclinicity‑and‑relief (JEBAR) in the potential vorticity equation, which is caused by tidal oscillation instead of tidally‑enhanced vertical mixing. The WBC then hits the island chain and induces exchange fows. This tidal control of WBC pathways is applicable on subpolar and polar regions globally. Te water exchange between the Sea of Okhotsk and the North Pacifc is an essential component of the over- turning circulation that ventilates the intermediate layer of the North Pacifc 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Source Evaluation of Archaeological Obsidian from the Kuril Islands of the Russian Far East Using Portable XRF
    Journal of Archaeological Science 36 (2009) 1256–1263 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Archaeological Science journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jas Initial source evaluation of archaeological obsidian from the Kuril Islands of the Russian Far East using portable XRF S. Colby Phillips a,*, Robert J. Speakman b a University of Washington, Department of Anthropology, Box 353100, Seattle, WA 98195, USA b Smithsonian Institution, Museum Conservation Institute, USA article info abstract Article history: Obsidian artifacts recently have been recovered from 18 archaeological sites on eight islands across the Received 22 September 2008 Kuril Island archipelago in the North Pacific Ocean, suggesting a wide-ranging distribution of obsidian Received in revised form throughout the island chain over the last 2,500 years. Although there are no geologic sources of obsidian 7 January 2009 in the Kurils that are known to have been used prehistorically, sources exist in Hokkaido, Japan, and Accepted 9 January 2009 Kamchatka, Russia, the southern and northern geographic regions respectively from which obsidian may have entered the Kuril Islands. This paper reports on the initial sourcing attempt of Kuril Islands obsidian Keywords: through the analysis of 131 obsidian artifacts. Data from this research were generated through the Kuril Islands Obsidian application of portable XRF technology, and are used to address research questions concerning prehis- XRF toric mobility, exchange, and social networking in the Kuril Islands. Exchange networks Ó 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Hokkaido, Kamchatka 1. Introduction the connections that these people had with social networks in other parts of northeast Asia. Data reported here contribute new During the past decade, a number of studies have detailed the information to archaeological obsidian studies in northeast Asia, obsidian sources and prehistoric obsidian use in northeast Asia and provide a basis for further research in the Kuril Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Biogeography of the Islands of the Kuril Archipelago Theodore W
    Journal of Biogeography, 30, 1297–1310 Biodiversity and biogeography of the islands of the Kuril Archipelago Theodore W. Pietsch1*, Victor V. Bogatov2, Kunio Amaoka3, Yuri N. Zhuravlev2, Vyacheslav Y. Barkalov2, Sarah Gage4, Hideki Takahashi5, Arkady S. Lelej2, Sergey Y. Storozhenko2, Norobu Minakawa6, Daniel J. Bennett1, Trevor R. Anderson1, Masahiro Oˆ hara5, Larisa A. Prozorova2, Yasuhiro Kuwahara7, Sergey K. Kholin2, Mamoru Yabe3, Duane E. Stevenson8 and Erin L. MacDonald11School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, 2Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences, Far East Branch, Vladivostok, Russia, 3Laboratory of Marine Biodiversity, Graduate School of Fisheries Sciences, Hokkaido University, Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan, 4Department of Botany, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, 5Hokkaido University Museum, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, 6Department of Microbiology, Saga Medical School, Saga, Japan, 7Hokkaido Abashiri Fisheries Experimental Station, Abashiri, Japan and 8Resource Assessment and Conservation Engineering Division, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, Seattle, WA, USA Abstract Aim Based on seven consecutive seasons of biotic survey and inventory of the terrestrial and freshwater plants and animals of the 30 major islands of the Kuril Archipelago, a description of the biodiversity and an analysis of the biogeography of this previously little known part of the world are provided. Location The Kuril Archipelago, a natural laboratory for investigations into the origin, subsequent evolution, and long-term maintenance of insular populations, forms the eastern boundary of the Okhotsk Sea, extending 1200 km between Hokkaido, Japan, and the Kamchatka Peninsula of Russia. A chain of more than 56 islands, the system is only slightly smaller than the Hawaiian Islands, covering an area of 15,600 km2 and providing 2409 km of coastline.
    [Show full text]
  • 339–354 a Review on Mesopelagic Fishes Belonging to Family
    Author version: Rev. Fish Biol. Fish., vol.21; 2011; 339–354 A Review on Mesopelagic Fishes belonging to family Myctophidae 1*Ms.Venecia Catul, 2* Dr. Manguesh Gauns, 3Dr. P.K Karuppasamy 1*[email protected]; Tel: 91-9890618568, Fax: 91-0832-2450217 National Institute of Oceanography, Dona Paula, Goa, India 2 *[email protected]; Tel: 91-0832-2450217 National Institute of Oceanography, Dona Paula, Goa, India 3 [email protected]; Tel: 91- 9447607809 National Institute of Oceanography, Regional Centre, Kochi, India *- Corresponding authors 1 Abstract Myctophids are mesopelagic fishes belonging to family Myctophidae. They are represented by approx. 250 species in 33 genera. Called as “Lanternfishes”, they inhabit all oceans except the Arctic. They are well-known for exhibiting adaptations to oxygen minimum zones (OMZ- in the upper 2000m) and also performing diel vertical migration between the meso- and epipelagic regions. True to their name, lanternfishes possess glowing effect due to the presence of the photophores systematically arranged on their body, one of the important characteristic adding to their unique ecological features. Mid-water trawling is a conventional method of catching these fishes which usually accounts for biomass approx. in million tones as seen in Arabian Sea (20-100 million) or Southern ocean (70-200 million). Ecologically, myctophids link primary consumers like copepods, euphausiids and top predators like squids, whales and penguins in a typical food web. Lantern fishes become a major part of deep scattering layers (DSL) during migration along with other fauna such as euphausiids, medusae, fish juveniles, etc. Like any other marine organisms, Myctophids are susceptible to parasites like siphonostomatoid copepods, nematode larvae etc in natural habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Kuril Islands' Obsidian (2009)
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Journal of Archaeological Science 36 (2009) 1256–1263 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Archaeological Science journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jas Initial source evaluation of archaeological obsidian from the Kuril Islands of the Russian Far East using portable XRF S. Colby Phillips a,*, Robert J. Speakman b a University of Washington, Department of Anthropology, Box 353100, Seattle, WA 98195, USA b Smithsonian Institution, Museum Conservation Institute, USA article info abstract Article history: Obsidian artifacts recently have been recovered from 18 archaeological sites on eight islands across the Received 22 September 2008 Kuril Island archipelago in the North Pacific Ocean, suggesting a wide-ranging distribution of obsidian Received in revised form throughout the island chain over the last 2,500 years. Although there are no geologic sources of obsidian 7 January 2009 in the Kurils that are known to have been used prehistorically, sources exist in Hokkaido, Japan, and Accepted 9 January 2009 Kamchatka, Russia, the southern and northern geographic regions respectively from which obsidian may have entered the Kuril Islands.
    [Show full text]