DOCSLIB.ORG

Justice Compromised RIGHTS the Legacy of Rwanda’S Community-Based Gacaca Courts WATCH

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Justice Compromised RIGHTS the Legacy of Rwanda’S Community-Based Gacaca Courts WATCH Rwanda HUMAN Justice Compromised RIGHTS The Legacy of Rwanda’s Community-Based Gacaca Courts WATCH Justice Compromised The Legacy of Rwanda’s Community-Based Gacaca Courts Copyright © 2011 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-757-4 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org may 2011 1-56432-757-4 Justice Compromised The Legacy of Rwanda’s Community-Based Gacaca Courts I. Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 1 II. Recommendations ......................................................................................................................... 7 To the Rwandan Government ....................................................................................................... 7 To Rwandan Justice Officials ........................................................................................................ 7 To the Rwandan Legislature ........................................................................................................ 8 To Donors ................................................................................................................................... 9 To Countries Considering the Use of Dispute Resolution Mechanisms Similar to Gacaca to Prosecute Serious Crimes ........................................................................................................... 9 III. Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 11 IV. The Rwandan Genocide and the Decision to Use Gacaca.............................................................. 13 V. The Initial Phase of Gacaca .......................................................................................................... 17 Differences between the Customary and Contemporary Gacaca Systems .................................... 17 The Legal Framework Governing Genocide Cases and Gacaca Courts .......................................... 18 Rwanda’s first genocide law ................................................................................................ 18 The gacaca laws .................................................................................................................. 19 Gacaca’s Pilot Phase.................................................................................................................. 21 National Implementation of Gacaca ........................................................................................... 22 Repeated Extensions of Gacaca’s Closing Date .......................................................................... 23 The Final Phase of Gacaca .......................................................................................................... 25 VI. Balancing Community-Based Conflict Resolution Practices with Fair Trial Standards ................. 27 Limited International Fair Trial Rights in Gacaca ......................................................................... 27 The right to counsel ............................................................................................................ 28 The presumption of innocence ............................................................................................ 31 The right to be informed of the case and to have time to prepare a defense ......................... 34 The right to present a defense ............................................................................................. 42 The right to testify in one’s defense and the right against self-incrimination ......................... 45 Protection from double jeopardy ........................................................................................ 48 The right to be present at one’s own trial ............................................................................. 55 The right not to be arbitrarily detained ................................................................................ 62 Differences in Judicial Standards between Conventional Courts and Gacaca ............................... 65 Judges: qualifications, training, remuneration and removal ................................................. 65 Burden and standards of proof ........................................................................................... 69 Sentencing and Reparations ...................................................................................................... 73 Provisional releases ............................................................................................................ 74 “Life imprisonment with special provisions” ........................................................................ 75 Community service .............................................................................................................. 77 Compensation.................................................................................................................... 80 VII. The Community Dynamic of Gacaca ........................................................................................... 83 Community Participation ............................................................................................................ 83 Risks for Witnesses ................................................................................................................... 86 Risk of arbitrary arrest and detention or being charged with committing perjury or complicity in genocide ........................................................................................................................ 88 Fear of being ostracized by the community ......................................................................... 90 Intimidation ........................................................................................................................ 91 Gacaca as a Means of Resolving Personal Grievances ............................................................... 94 Silencing Opponents and Critical Voices ................................................................................... 98 The case of Dr. Théoneste Niyitegeka.................................................................................. 98 The case of Father Guy Theunis .......................................................................................... 99 Other cases ....................................................................................................................... 100 VIII. Independence and Impartiality of the Gacaca Process ............................................................. 104 Potential Conflicts of Interest for Judges ................................................................................... 104 Corruption and Personal Gain through Gacaca ......................................................................... 105 Judges requesting bribes ................................................................................................... 106 Accused persons seeking exoneration ............................................................................... 108 Genocide survivors seeking compensation ........................................................................ 109 External Interference in Decision-Making ................................................................................. 110 IX. Rape Cases: the Antithesis of Gacaca ........................................................................................ 112 The Decision to Transfer Rape Cases to Gacaca ........................................................................ 112 Rape Cases that Were Not Brought before Gacaca ..................................................................... 115 Rape Victims’ Perspectives on Gacaca ..................................................................................... 116 X. Selective Justice and the Failure to Address Rwandan Patriotic Front Crimes ................................. 119 XI. Perspectives on Gacaca ............................................................................................................ 122 Genocide Survivors’ Perspectives ............................................................................................ 122 The Perspectives of Those Accused of Genocide and their Families .......................................... 124 Reconciliation Achieved? ......................................................................................................... 125 XII. International Support for Gacaca ............................................................................................. 127 XIII. Conclusion .............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Republic of Rwanda Ministry of Education P.O.Box 622
    REPUBLIC OF RWANDA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION P.O.BOX 622 KIGALI Rwanda Report on Variable Tranche linked to two Indicators: 1.Equity Indicator: Pre-Primary Gross Enrolment Rate (GER) increased from an average of 10% in 2014 to 17% by 2017 in the 22 poorest performing districts (defined as those that had GER of less than 17% in 2014). $2.52million will be disbursed once the report demonstrating meeting the target is submitted in October 2017 2. Efficiency: Education Statistics 2016, disaggregated at district level, available. $2.52million will be disbursed once the report demonstrating meeting the target is submitted in October 2017 October 2017 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 SECTION 1: EQUITY INDICATOR: PRE-PRIMARY GROSS ENROLMENT RATE (GER) IN 22 POOREST PERFORMING DISTRICTS ............................................................ 3 Table 1. Pre-Primary Enrolment in 2016 and 2017 (All Distrcits) ................................. 3 Table 2. Pre-Primary Gross Enrolement Rate in Rwanda (as per GPE requirement) 5 Table 3. Pre-Primary GER in 2017 in 22 poorest performing districts current status 5 Table 4. Average of GER in Pre-Primary in 8 better performing districts in 2017 ...... 6 Table 5. GER in Pre-Primary Comparison between 2014 and 2017 in 22 Poorest Performing Districts ............................................................................................................ 7 Table 6. Classrooms Rehabilitated
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda NCA Land Accounts 2018
    RWANDA NATURAL CAPITAL ACCOUNTS - LAND March 2018 The Rwanda Natural Capital Accounts for Land, has been compiled, designed and published by the National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR) and the Ministry of Environment with assistance from the World Bank and the WAVES Global Partnership. Additional information about the NCA Land 2016 may be obtained from: NISR: KN, 2 Av, 36, PO. Box 6139, Kigali Rwanda; Telephone: +250 252 571 035 Email: [email protected] Ministry of Environment: PO Box 3502, Kigali Rwanda; Telephone +250 788 305 291 Website: www.minirena.gov.rw Ministry of Land and Forest: PO Box 3502, Kigali Rwanda; Telephone +250 788 305 291 Website: www.minilaf.gov.rw Cover image constructed from maps produced by the Regional Centre for Mapping Resources for Development, available from www.rcmrd.org and available on RLMUA Land Use Planning Portal www.rwandalanduse.rnra.rw. Recommended citation: Government of Rwanda (NISR, Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Lands and Forestry), Natural Capital Accounts for Land, March 2018. ii Contents LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... V LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... V ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................... VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    SFG1006 REV Rwanda Great Lakes Emergency Sexual and Gender Based Violence and Women’s Health Project Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental and Social Management Approach, including Environmental Management Plan and Medical Waste Management Plan Executive Summary and Conclusions The Environmental and Social Management Approach (ESMA) provides general policies, guidelines, codes of practice and procedures to mainstream environmental and social (E&S) due diligence during the implementation of the World Bank supported Great Lakes Emergency Sexual and Gender Based Violence and Women’s Health Project. The objective of the abbreviated ESMA is to help ensure that activities will be in compliance with the national legislations of Rwanda and the World Bank’s E&S safeguards policies. Public Disclosure Authorized The document is the main due diligence instrument required by the World Bank as financer, and additionally covers and goes beyond the Rwandan national regulatory requirements for project- level environmental assessment and management. The Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) will be the main resource for environmental management and monitoring for the Client and set the standards and practices that will guide environmental and social project performance. It will become part of the tender package and environmental management and compliance will constitute a subsection of line items in the bill of quantities (BoQ). The selected bidders will be required to accept E&S conditions and tasks upon contract signature, and the implementation of the ESMP will be an integral part of the construction contracts. The monitoring of E&S performance will, much as other quality criteria, be tied to contractual penalties and damage restoration requirements via appropriate contractual clauses.
    [Show full text]
  • A N N U a L R E P O R T 2 0
    National Union of Disability Organizations in Rwanda (NUDOR) A n n u a l R e p o r t 2 0 1 8 NUDOR-Annual report 2018 NUDOR envisages a society where people with disabilities enjoy equal human rights, opportunities and full participation as other citizens. Together we stand Page 1 of 32 NUDOR-Annual report 2018 Welcome from our Chairperson Together we stand. We are not about the cease our work until disability rights are upheld” Since NUDOR was created 9 years ago, a significant advocacy work for inclusion of persons with disability has conducted national wide as well as at local level. However, a lot of challenges are still surfacing. NUDOR and its member have re- newed the commitment towards a Rwandan society People with Disabil- ities enjoy equal human rights, opportunities and full participation as oth- er citizen. In this annual report you will read about how NUDOR advocated for the rights of PWDs in 2018, the key achievements, challenges and way for- ward for the years to come Dominique Bizimana, Chairperson of NUDOR Our interventions for 2018 were guided by our strategic objectives: Rep- resentation and accountability, Capacity building and resource mobilization and Advocacy and influ- encing in 3 priority areas: education, health and poverty reduction. These aims focus on establishing internal systems to ensure the priorities of member organizations are better reflected in NUDOR programmes; help NUDOR and its members to become stronger so that they can bring about change for persons with disabilities; and focus NUDOR’s advocacy efforts on the most pressing is- sues faced by persons with disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of Rwanda (Gor) 2015 Local Government PEFA PFM
    Government of Rwanda (GoR) 2015 Local Government PEFA PFM Performance Assessment Kicukiro District Final Report Prepared by AECOM International Team of Chinedum Nwoko (Team Leader) Jorge Shepherd Stephen Hitimana Theo Frank Munya 31 July 2017 i Basic Information Currency Rwanda Franc = 100 cents Official Exchange Rate ((US $, June 2015) 765 RwF (Average) Fiscal/Budget Year 1 July – 30 June Weights and Measures Metric System Kicukiro District Location City of Kigali, Rwanda Government Elected Mayor (Chief Executive) and District Council Political arrangement Administrative decentralization HQs Kicukiro Industrial/Commercial Cities Kicukuro / Urban district Population 318,564 (2012 census) Area 167 km2 Population Density 1,911 persons/km2 (2012 census) Official Languages Kinyarwanda, English, & French ii Kicukiro District PEFA PFM-PR 2015 - Final Government of Rwanda – 2015 Local Government PEFA PFM Performance Assessment – Kicukiro District – Final Report – 31 July 2017 The quality assurance process followed in the production of this report satisfies all the requirements of the PEFA Secretariat and hence receives the ‘PEFA CHECK’. PEFA Secretariat August 28, 2017 iii Kicukiro District PEFA PFM-PR 2015 - Final Disclosure of Quality Assurance Mechanism The following quality assurance arrangements have been established in the planning and preparation of the PEFA assessment report for the District of Kicukiro, Rwanda, and final report dated July 31, 2017. 1. Review of Concept Note - Draft concept note and/or terms of reference dated November 2014 was submitted for review on November 4, 2014 to the following reviewers: - 1) District of Kicukiro - 2) Government of Rwanda - 3) World Bank - 4) Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KFW) - 5) Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) - 6) UK Department for International Development (DFID) - 7) EU Delegation - 8) Agence Belge de Développement (BTC) - 9) PEFA Secretariat Final concept note dated February 25, 2015 was forwarded to reviewers.
    [Show full text]
  • Nowhere to Go : Informal Settlement Eradication in Kigali, Rwanda
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository College of Arts & Sciences Senior Honors Theses College of Arts & Sciences 5-2017 Nowhere to go : informal settlement eradication in Kigali, Rwanda. Emily E Benken University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/honors Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Benken, Emily E, "Nowhere to go : informal settlement eradication in Kigali, Rwanda." (2017). College of Arts & Sciences Senior Honors Theses. Paper 127. http://doi.org/10.18297/honors/127 This Senior Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Sciences at ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Arts & Sciences Senior Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOWHERE TO GO: INFORMAL SETTLEMENT ERADICATION IN KIGALI, RWANDA By Emily Elizabeth Benken Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Graduation summa cum laude and for Graduation with Honors from the Department of Anthropology University of Louisville May 2017 i ii NOWHERE TO GO: INFORMAL SETTLEMENT ERADICATION IN KIGALI, RWANDA By Emily Elizabeth Benken A Thesis Approved on March 27th, 2017 by the following Thesis Committee: Thesis Advisor Thesis Committee Member Thesis Committee Member iii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my grandmother Mrs. Joyce Graeter Whose unending support made this thesis possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Sainclairthesisfinal.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF AFRICAN STUDIES PROGRAM ETHNIC CONFLICTS AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION MECHANISMS: A CASE STUDY OF RWANDA TALIA SAINCLAIR SPRING 2016 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in African Studies with honors in African Studies Reviewed and approved* by the following: Clemente Abrokwaa Professor of African Studies Thesis Supervisor Kevin Thomas Professor of Sociology Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT Conflict forms as an inevitable and fundamental aspect of human nature and coexistence, occurring due to natural differences in human interests, perceptions, desires, ambitions, and general dispositions. Conflict can occur, therefore, based on any range of issues including social, economic, political, cultural and religious beliefs. The purpose of this study is to examine the nature and causes of ethnic conflicts in Africa and the methods employed in resolving such conflicts. Specifically, it focuses on the Rwandan genocide of 1994 and the conflict resolution strategies employed by the government in its attempts at mitigating ethnic tensions in the post-genocide period of the country. The objective is to seek effective methods to help prevent and resolve conflicts on the African continent. Several studies have been conducted on the Rwandan genocide that focus on the conflict itself and its causes, as well as the progress Rwanda has made in the twenty-two years since the end of the genocide. However, few studies have focused on the conflict resolution methods employed in the post- genocide period that enabled the country to recover from the effects of the conflict in 1994 to its current state of peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda USADF Country Portfolio
    Rwanda USADF Country Portfolio Overview: Country program was established in 1986 and resumed U.S. African Development Foundation Partner Organization: in 2005 after a pause. USADF currently manages a portfolio of 24 Country Program Coordinator: Geoffrey Kayigi Africa Development Consultants projects and one Cooperative Agreement in Rwanda. PO Box 7210, CCOAIB Building, 3rd Floor Program Director: Rebecca Ruzibuka Total active commitment is $4.33 million. Agricultural investments Remera 1, Plot 2280, Umuganda Bld, Kigali Tel: +250.78.841.5194 total $3.66 million, off-grid energy investments total $348,778, and Tel: +250.78.830.3934 Email: [email protected] youth-led enterprise investments total $25,000. Email: [email protected] Country Strategy: The program focuses on smallholder farmer organizations across the country. Enterprise Duration Grant Size Description Coopérative des Agriculteurs de 2013-2017 $186,800 Sector: Agro-Processing (Maize) Maïs de Nyanza Town/City: Nyanza District, Southern Province (COAMANYA) Summary: The project funds will be used to construct a new factory and purchase approved equipment 2904-RWA and to expand marshland cultivation to another 130 hectares which will directly contribute to an increase of income for over 2,000 persons and promote food security in the area. Funds are also being used to roll out a pilot version of an innovative plot-mapping information system. Coopérative pour le 2015-2017 $78,700 Sector: Processing (Honey) Développement des Apiculteurs et Town/City: Nyamagabe District, Southern Province la Protection de l'Environnement Summary: The project funds will be used to supply beehives, harvesting equipment and to develop an (CODAPE) administrative and financial procedures manual and business plan, as well as to cover key staff 4113-RWA members’ salaries and basic administrative costs to enhance the cooperative’s capacity and boost its honey production and sales revenues.
    [Show full text]
  • Struggling to Survive: Barriers to Justice for Rape Victims in Rwanda
    Human Rights Watch September 2004 Vol. 16, No. 10(A) STRUGGLING TO SURVIVE: BARRIERS TO JUSTICE FOR RAPE VICTIMS IN RWANDA I. SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 1 II. RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................................................. 4 III. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................ 7 Sexual Violence during the 1994 Genocide.......................................................................... 7 Rwandan Women in the Post-Genocide Period................................................................10 IV. BARRIERS TO JUSTICE FOR SEXUAL VIOLENCE CRIMES .....................13 Genocide Prosecutions in the Rwandan Legal System.....................................................13 General Context..................................................................................................................13 Legislation Governing Genocide Trials and Gacaca.....................................................14 Cases of Sexual Violence in Genocide Trials and Gacaca Proceedings.....................18 Obstacles to Reporting Sexual Violence .............................................................................22 Victims’ Concerns Regarding Lack of Evidence ...........................................................23 Stigmatization, Retraumatization, and Inadequate Procedural Protections for Witnesses..............................................................................................................................24
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Reality RIGHTS Progress in Judicial Reform in Rwanda WATCH
    Rwanda HUMAN Law and Reality RIGHTS Progress in Judicial Reform in Rwanda WATCH Law and Reality Progress in Judicial Reform in Rwanda Copyright © 2008 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-366-8 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org July 2008 1-56432-366-8 Law and Reality Progress in Judicial Reform in Rwanda I. Summary......................................................................................................................... 1 II. Methodology..................................................................................................................6 III. Recommendations........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda Page 1 of 16
    Rwanda Page 1 of 16 2005 Human Rights Report Released | Daily Press Briefing | Other News... Rwanda Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2005 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 8, 2006 Rwanda is a constitutional republic dominated by a strong presidency. The population was 8.4 million. The largely Tutsi Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), took power in 1994 and formed a government of National Unity that functioned during the transitional period following the civil war and genocide until 2003, when President Paul Kagame was elected to a seven-year term in largely peaceful but seriously marred elections. The country was affected by continuing instability in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), where armed rebel groups continued to operate with impunity despite the presence of a UN peacekeeping mission in the DRC. During the first two months of the year, there were unconfirmed reports from credible sources that Rwanda Defense Forces (RDF) troops were at times present in the eastern part of the DRC, particularly following public threats by the Rwandan president in December 2004, which indicated that the government might send RDF troops into the DRC to attack Hutu rebels deemed a threat to its security. However, the government publicly denied allegations that RDF troops were operating in the DRC. Unlike in the previous year, there were no reports that Rwandan rebels in the DRC, known as the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), conducted attacks in the northwestern region of Rwanda. The FDLR, largely made up of Rwandan Hutus who fled to the DRC in 1994 after the genocide, continued to be led by many individuals responsible for leading the genocide, and it continued to actively oppose the Kagame government.
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda Assessment
    Rwanda, Country Information Page 1 of 54 RWANDA ASSESSMENT October 2002 Country Information and Policy Unit I SCOPE OF DOCUMENT II GEOGRAPHY III ECONOMY IV HISTORY V STATE STRUCTURES VIA HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES VIB HUMAN RIGHTS - SPECIFIC GROUPS VIC HUMAN RIGHTS - OTHER ISSUES ANNEX A: CHRONOLOGY OF MAJOR EVENTS ANNEX B: POLITICAL ORGANISATIONS ANNEX C: PROMINENT PEOPLE ANNEX D: CATEGORISATION OF GENOCIDE CRIMES REFERENCES TO SOURCE MATERIAL 1. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 This assessment has been produced by the Country Information and Policy Unit, Immigration and Nationality Directorate, Home Office, from information obtained from a wide variety of recognised sources. The document does not contain any Home Office opinion or policy. 1.2 The assessment has been prepared for background purposes for those involved in the asylum / human rights determination process. The information it contains is not exhaustive. It concentrates on the issues most commonly raised in asylum / human rights claims made in the United Kingdom. 1.3 The assessment is sourced throughout. It is intended to be used by caseworkers as a signpost to the source material, which has been made available to them. The vast majority of the source material is readily available in the public domain. 1.4 It is intended to revise the assessment on a six-monthly basis while the country remains within the top 35 asylum-seeker producing countries in the United Kingdom. http://194.203.40.90/ppage.asp?section=191&title=Rwanda%2C%20Country%20Informati...o 11/25/2002 Rwanda, Country Information Page 2 of 54 2. GEOGRAPHY 2.1 The Rwandan Republic is a land-locked country in east-central Africa, just south of the Equator, bordered by the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) to the west, Uganda to the north, Tanzania to the east and Burundi to the south.
    [Show full text]