Crystal Structure of the MID-PIWI Lobe of a Eukaryotic Argonaute Protein

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Crystal structure of the MID-PIWI lobe of a eukaryotic Argonaute protein Andreas Boland, Eric Huntzinger, Steffen Schmidt, Elisa Izaurralde1, and Oliver Weichenrieder1 Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Spemannstrasse 35, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany Edited by Jennifer A. Doudna, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved May 6, 2011 (received for review March 10, 2011) Argonaute proteins (AGOs) are essential effectors in RNA- involved in the micro-RNA (miRNA) pathway] contain a second, mediated gene silencing pathways. They are characterized by a allosteric nucleotide binding site with an affinity for m7GpppG bilobal architecture, in which one lobe contains the N-terminal cap analogs. However, considering the structures of the prokaryotic and PAZ domains and the other contains the MID and PIWI do- AGOs, it was unclear whether the putative second ligand-binding mains. Here, we present the first crystal structure of the MID-PIWI site would be accessible in the presence of the PIWI domain. lobe from a eukaryotic AGO, the Neurospora crassa QDE-2 protein. Toaddress this question and gain further molecular insight into Compared to prokaryotic AGOs, the domain orientation is con- eukaryotic AGOs, we determined the crystal structure of the served, indicating a conserved mode of nucleic acid binding. The entire MID-PIWI lobe of the Nc QDE-2 protein, tested its PIWI domain shows an adaptable surface loop next to a eukar- RNA-binding properties in vitro, and analyzed its implications yote-specific α-helical insertion, which are both likely to contact in vivo in the context of the Dm AGO1 protein. The structure the PAZ domain in a conformation-dependent manner to sense the provides a detailed, high-resolution view of the MID-PIWI inter- functional state of the protein. The MID-PIWI interface is hydrophi- face in a eukaryotic AGO protein and shows that the two domains lic and buries residues that were previously thought to participate are oriented very similarly to their prokaryotic counterparts, directly in the allosteric regulation of guide RNA binding. The inter- indicating a conserved mode of guide RNA/DNA strand recogni- face includes the binding pocket for the guide RNA 5′ end, and tion. However, despite these similarities, the PIWI-domain residues from both domains contribute to binding. Accordingly, exhibits eukaryote-specific structural features that might act as micro-RNA (miRNA) binding is particularly sensitive to alteration in sensors for the functional state of the protein. Finally, we show the MID-PIWI interface in Drosophila melanogaster AGO1 in vivo. that residues that have been implicated in allosteric regulation in The structure of the QDE-2 MID-PIWI lobe provides molecular and previous studies (21) are in fact involved in MID-PIWI interdo- mechanistic insight into eukaryotic AGOs and has significant impli- main interactions and contribute to guide RNA binding by cations for understanding the role of these proteins in silencing. stabilizing the MID-PIWI interface. roteins of the Argonaute (AGO) family play essential roles in Results PRNA-mediated gene silencing mechanisms in eukaryotes The Eukaryotic AGO MID-PIWI Lobe Adopts a Fold Highly Similar to the (1, 2). They are loaded with small noncoding RNAs to form the Prokaryotic Homologs. The Neurospora crassa Argonaute protein core of RNA-induced silencing complexes, which repress the QDE-2 (Nc QDE-2) is a close sequence homolog of eukaryotic expression of target genes at the transcriptional or posttran- AGOs that act in the small interfering RNA (siRNA) and miR- scriptional level (1, 2). The targets to be silenced are selected NA pathways [e.g., sequence identities with Hs AGO2 and Dm through base-pairing interactions between the loaded small RNA AGO1 are 30% and 29.7%, respectively (Fig. S1) (22, 23)]. We (also known as the guide RNA) and an mRNA target containing obtained diffracting crystals of a QDE-2 fragment containing the partially or fully complementary sequences (1–3). MID and PIWI domains (amino acids 506–938) and determined Thus far, structural information on full-length AGOs has been the structure at 3.65 Å resolution (crystal form I; Table S1). The available only for the homologous proteins from Archaea and structure revealed a disordered loop (loop L3, Fig. 1A, and Eubacteria, which preferentially use DNA as a guide (4–10). Fig. S1) including amino acids K786–A840 of the PIWI domain, These studies revealed that AGOs consist of four domains: the which we replaced with a Gly-Ser (GSG) linker to generate crys- N-terminal domain; the PAZ domain, which binds the 3′ end tals of a MID-PIWI ΔL3 protein that diffracted to 1.85 Å resolu- R of guide RNAs/DNAs; the MID domain, which provides a bind- tion. This structure (crystal form II) was refined to an work of ′ R ¼ 23 6% R ing pocket for the 5 phosphate of guide RNAs/DNAs; and the 19.6% ( free . ), whereas crystal form I yielded an work R ¼ 25 2% PIWI domain, which adopts an RNase H fold and has endonu- of 23.3% ( free . )(Table S1). cleolytic activity in some, but not all, AGOs (4–11). This structure reveals the details of a eukaryotic AGO MID- For the eukaryotic AGO clade of Argonaute proteins, structural PIWI lobe. The individual MID and PIWI domains superimpose information is available only for the isolated PAZ domains of well with the structures of previously determined archaeal and Drosophila melanogaster (Dm) AGO1 and AGO2, human AGO1 eubacterial AGO MID and PIWI domains (Fig. 1A vs. 1B and (12–16) and the MID domains of human AGO2 and Neurospora crassa (Nc) QDE-2 (17, 18). Structural information is also avail- able for PAZ domains of the PIWI clade of AGOs (19, 20). These Author contributions: A.B., E.I., and O.W. designed research; A.B., E.H., and O.W. performed research; A.B., E.H., S.S., E.I., and O.W. analyzed data; and A.B., E.I., and studies showed that the PAZ and MID domains of eukaryotic O.W. wrote the paper. AGOs adopt folds similar to the prokaryotic homologs and recog- The authors declare no conflict of interest. nize the 3′-and5′-terminal nucleotides of the guide strand, respec- This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. tively, in a similar manner to their prokaryotic counterparts (12–18). Our previous structure of the isolated Nc QDE-2 MID domain Freely available online through the PNAS open access option. revealed that the 5′-nucleotide binding site shares residues with a Data deposition: The accession codes and coordinates of the QDE-2 MID-PIWI lobe and ′ MID-PIWI ΔL3 have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, www.pdb.org (PDB ID codes second, adjacent sulfate ion-binding site, suggesting that the 5 - 2yhb and 2yha). terminal nucleotide of the guide RNA and a second ligand may bind 1To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] cooperatively to the MID domain of eukaryotic AGOs (17). These or [email protected]. findings supported the observation of Djuranovic et al. (21) that This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/ the isolated MID domains of certain eukaryotic AGOs [i.e., those doi:10.1073/pnas.1103946108/-/DCSupplemental. 10466–10471 ∣ PNAS ∣ June 28, 2011 ∣ vol. 108 ∣ no. 26 www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1103946108 Downloaded by guest on September 26, 2021 here to the AGO clade, which contains Nc QDE-2 and eukaryotic AGOs involved in the siRNA and miRNA pathways. The PIWI Domain and the Interaction with Target mRNA. The PIWI domain of Nc QDE-2 (residues H644–I938) adopts an RNase H fold with a catalytically active DDD motif, which is less common than the DDH motif present in most eukaryotic AGOs (Fig. S1). A structure-based alignment (Fig. S1) identified a series of loops on the putative nucleic acid-binding surface of the PIWI domain [Fig. 1A, loops L1 (H667–P681), L2 (G746–Q751), L3 (K788– A840), and L4 (F873–I882)]. Their significance is best under- stood in the context of a double stranded nucleic acid substrate that can be placed on the QDE-2 MID-PIWI lobe by the struc- tural superposition with Thermus thermophilus AGO-nucleic acid complex [Fig. 1 B and C; Protein Data Bank (PDB) ID code 3HJF; ref. 10]. In this particular model substrate, the 3′ end of the guide DNA strand is not anchored in the PAZ domain. Instead, nucleotides 2 to 15 of the guide DNA are base-paired to an RNA target strand, forming a duplex extending beyond the seed sequence (see Fig. 1D for a numbering of the respective nucleotides), which is typical for siRNA targets but rather rare for animal miRNA targets (3). The scissile bond of the model target strand (between nucleo- tides 10′ and 11′) fits nicely in the catalytic site (Fig. 2 A and B), and loop L2 is perfectly positioned to probe the minor groove of the duplex (base pair 13) with S748 (Fig. 2 C and D). Loop L2 is highly conserved in all eukaryotic AGOs and likely fixes the phos- phodiester backbone of the target strand (nucleotides 12′ and 13′) via E749 and nucleotide 14 from the guide strand via Q751 (Fig. 2 C and D) in cases where the downstream duplex is formed (e.g., in the case of fully complementary targets). Loop L3 is disordered in crystal form I and was deleted in crys- tal form II. Judging from the prokaryotic AGO structures, the central parts of this loop likely organize the missing lobe (contain- ing the N-term and PAZ domains) of the AGO protein (Fig. S2B), whereas the N-terminal residues of loop L3 [including the con- served K786 (Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Not Dicer but Argonaute Is Required for a Microrna Production

    Not Dicer but Argonaute Is Required for a Microrna Production

    Cell Research (2010) 20:735-737. npg © 2010 IBCB, SIBS, CAS All rights reserved 1001-0602/10 $ 32.00 RESEARCH HIGHLIGHT www.nature.com/cr A new twist in the microRNA pathway: Not Dicer but Argonaute is required for a microRNA production Gabriel D Bossé1, Martin J Simard1 1Laval University Cancer Research Centre, Hôtel-Dieu de Québec (CHUQ), Quebec City, Québec G1R 2J6, Canada Cell Research (2010) 20:735-737. doi:10.1038/cr.2010.83; published online 15 June 2010 Found in all metazoans, microRNAs A Canonical pathway B Ago2-dependent pathway or miRNAs are small non-coding RNA Nucleus Cytoplasm Nucleus Cytoplasm of ~22 nucleotides in length that com- Exp.5 Exp.5 pletely reshaped our understanding of gene regulation. This new class of gene pre-miR-451 regulator is mostly transcribed by the pre-miRNA RNA polymerase II producing a long stem-loop structure, called primary- or Ago2 pri-miRNA, that will first be processed Ago2 Dicer in the cell nucleus by a multiprotein TRBP complex called microprocessor to gen- erate a shorter RNA structure called Ago2 RISC precursor- or pre-miRNA. The precisely Ago2 RISC processed pre-miRNA will next be ex- ported into the cytoplasm by Exportin 5 and loaded onto another processing machine containing the ribonuclease III enzyme Dicer, an Argonaute protein Ago2 Ago2 and other accessory cellular factors mRNA mRNA (Figure 1A; [1]). Dicer will mediate the Translation inhibition Translation inhibition cleavage of the pre-miRNA to form the mature miRNA that will then be bound Figure 1 (A) Canonical microRNA biogenesis. In mammals, the pre-miRNA is by the Argonaute protein to form, most loaded onto a multiprotein complex consisting minimally of Dicer, Tar RNA Bind- likely with other cellular factors, the ef- ing Protein (TRBP) and Ago2.
  • The Argonaute Family: Tentacles That Reach Into Rnai, Developmental Control, Stem Cell Maintenance, and Tumorigenesis

    The Argonaute Family: Tentacles That Reach Into Rnai, Developmental Control, Stem Cell Maintenance, and Tumorigenesis

    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 26, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press The Argonaute family: tentacles that reach into RNAi, developmental control, stem cell maintenance, and tumorigenesis Michelle A. Carmell,1,2,3 Zhenyu Xuan,1,3 Michael Q. Zhang,1 and Gregory J. Hannon1,4 1Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA; 2Program in Genetics, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA RNA interference (RNAi) is an evolutionarily conserved The Argonaute family process through which double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) Argonaute proteins make up a highly conserved family induces the silencing of cognate genes (for review, see whose members have been implicated in RNAi and re- Bernstein et al. 2001b; Carthew 2001). Sources of dsRNA lated phenomena in several organisms. In addition to silencing triggers include experimentally introduced roles in RNAi-like mechanisms, Argonaute proteins in- dsRNAs, RNA viruses, transposons, and RNAs tran- fluence development, and at least a subset are involved scribed from complex transgene arrays (for review, see in stem cell fate determination. Argonaute proteins are Hammond et al. 2001b). Short hairpin sequences en- ∼100-kD highly basic proteins that contain two common coded in the genome also appear to enter the RNAi path- domains, namely PAZ and PIWI domains (Cerutti et al. way and function to regulate the expression of endog- 2000). The PAZ domain, consisting of 130 amino acids, enous, protein-coding genes (Grishok et al. 2001; has been identified in Argonaute proteins and in Dicer Hutvagner et al. 2001; Ketting et al.
  • Argonaute Proteins at a Glance Christine Ender and Gunter Meister

    Argonaute Proteins at a Glance Christine Ender and Gunter Meister

    Cell Science at a Glance 1819 Argonaute proteins at a RNAs) – ncRNAs that are characteristically Biogenesis of miRNAs and siRNAs ~20-35 nucleotides long – are required for miRNAs glance the regulation of gene expression in many Generally, miRNAs are transcribed by RNA different organisms. Most small RNA species polymerase II or III to form stem-loop-structured Christine Ender1 and Gunter fall into one of the following three classes: primary miRNA transcripts (pri-miRNAs). pri- Meister1,2,* microRNAs (miRNAs), short-interfering RNAs miRNAs are processed in the nucleus by the 1 Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich (siRNAs) and Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) microprocessor complex, which contains (CIPSM), Laboratory of RNA Biology, Max-Planck- Institute of Biochemistry, Am Klopferspitz 18, 82152 (Carthew and Sontheimer, 2009). Although the RNAse III enzyme Drosha and its DiGeorge Martinsried, Germany different small RNA classes have different syndrome critical region gene 8 (DGCR8) 2University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany bio genesis pathways and exert different cofactor. The transcripts are cleaved at the stem *Author for correspondence functions, all of them must associate with a of the hairpin to produce a stem-loop- ([email protected]) member of the Argonaute protein family for structured miRNA precursor (pre-miRNA) of Journal of Cell Science 123, 1819-1823 activity. This article and its accompanying ~70 nucleotides. After this first processing step, © 2010. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd poster provide an overview of the different pre-miRNAs are exported into the cytoplasm by doi:10.1242/jcs.055210 classes of small RNAs and the manner in which exportin-5, where they are further processed they interact with Argonaute protein family by the RNAse III enzyme Dicer and its TRBP Although a large portion of the human genome members during small-RNA-guided gene (HIV transactivating response RNA-binding is actively transcribed into RNA, less than 2% silencing.
  • Mutual Regulation of RNA Silencing and the IFN Response As an Antiviral Defense System in Mammalian Cells

    Mutual Regulation of RNA Silencing and the IFN Response As an Antiviral Defense System in Mammalian Cells

    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Mutual Regulation of RNA Silencing and the IFN Response as an Antiviral Defense System in Mammalian Cells Tomoko Takahashi 1,2,* and Kumiko Ui-Tei 1,3,* 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan 2 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University, Saitama 338-8570, Japan 3 Department of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Chiba 277-8561, Japan * Correspondence: [email protected] (T.T.); [email protected] (K.U.-T.); Tel.: +81-48-858-3404 (T.T.); +81-3-5841-3044 (K.U.-T.) Received: 23 December 2019; Accepted: 15 February 2020; Published: 17 February 2020 Abstract: RNA silencing is a posttranscriptional gene silencing mechanism directed by endogenous small non-coding RNAs called microRNAs (miRNAs). By contrast, the type-I interferon (IFN) response is an innate immune response induced by exogenous RNAs, such as viral RNAs. Endogenous and exogenous RNAs have typical structural features and are recognized accurately by specific RNA-binding proteins in each pathway. In mammalian cells, both RNA silencing and the IFN response are induced by double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) in the cytoplasm, but have long been considered two independent pathways. However, recent reports have shed light on crosstalk between the two pathways, which are mutually regulated by protein–protein interactions triggered by viral infection. This review provides brief overviews of RNA silencing and the IFN response and an outline of the molecular mechanism of their crosstalk and its biological implications.
  • Trna-Derived Short Non-Coding RNA As Interacting Partners of Argonaute Proteins

    Trna-Derived Short Non-Coding RNA As Interacting Partners of Argonaute Proteins

    Thomas Jefferson University Jefferson Digital Commons Computational Medicine Center Faculty Papers Computational Medicine Center 7-9-2015 tRNA-Derived Short Non-coding RNA as Interacting Partners of Argonaute Proteins. Megumi Shigematsu Computational Medicine Center, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Yohei Kirino, PhD Computational Medicine Center, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Follow this and additional works at: https://jdc.jefferson.edu/tjucompmedctrfp Part of the Other Medical Specialties Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Recommended Citation Shigematsu, Megumi and Kirino, PhD, Yohei, "tRNA-Derived Short Non-coding RNA as Interacting Partners of Argonaute Proteins." (2015). Computational Medicine Center Faculty Papers. Paper 7. https://jdc.jefferson.edu/tjucompmedctrfp/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Jefferson Digital Commons. The Jefferson Digital Commons is a service of Thomas Jefferson University's Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL). The Commons is a showcase for Jefferson books and journals, peer-reviewed scholarly publications, unique historical collections from the University archives, and teaching tools. The Jefferson Digital Commons allows researchers and interested readers anywhere in the world to learn about and keep up to date with Jefferson scholarship. This article has been accepted for inclusion in Computational Medicine Center Faculty Papers by an authorized administrator of the Jefferson Digital Commons.
  • Assembly of a Dsrna Synthesizing Complex: RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE 2 Contacts the Largest Subunit of NUCLEAR RNA POLYMERASE IV

    Assembly of a Dsrna Synthesizing Complex: RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE 2 Contacts the Largest Subunit of NUCLEAR RNA POLYMERASE IV

    Assembly of a dsRNA synthesizing complex: RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE 2 contacts the largest subunit of NUCLEAR RNA POLYMERASE IV Vibhor Mishraa,b, Jasleen Singhb, Feng Wanga,b, Yixiang Zhangc,d, Akihito Fukudomea,b, Jonathan C. Trinidadc,d, Yuichiro Takagie, and Craig S. Pikaarda,b,1 aHHMI, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405; bDepartment of Biology and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405; cDepartment of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405; dLaboratory for Biological Mass Spectrometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405; and eDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202 Contributed by Craig S. Pikaard, February 17, 2021 (sent for review September 12, 2020; reviewed by Julie A. Law and R. Keith Slotkin) In plants, transcription of selfish genetic elements such as trans- refractive to promoter-dependent gene transcription, thus ac- posons and DNA viruses is suppressed by RNA-directed DNA meth- counting for gene silencing. ylation. This process is guided by 24-nt short-interfering RNAs Using purified Pol IV, RDR2, and DCL3, we recently reca- (siRNAs) whose double-stranded precursors are synthesized by pitulated the siRNA biogenesis phase of the RNA-directed DNA DNA-dependent NUCLEAR RNA POLYMERASE IV (Pol IV) and methylation pathway in vitro (13). These experiments revealed RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE 2 (RDR2). Pol IV and RDR2 that Pol IV and RDR2 enzymatic activities are coupled, with Pol coimmunoprecipitate, and their activities are tightly coupled, yet IV’s distinctive termination mechanism facilitating the direct the basis for their association is unknown. Here, we show that an handoff, or channeling, of transcripts to RDR2 (24).
  • Biogenesis and Mechanism of Action of Small Non-Coding Rnas: Insights from the Point of View of Structural Biology

    Biogenesis and Mechanism of Action of Small Non-Coding Rnas: Insights from the Point of View of Structural Biology

    Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 10268-10295; doi:10.3390/ijms130810268 OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Molecular Sciences ISSN 1422-0067 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms Review Biogenesis and Mechanism of Action of Small Non-Coding RNAs: Insights from the Point of View of Structural Biology Marina C. Costa 1, Ana Lúcia Leitão 2 and Francisco J. Enguita 1,* 1 Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, Lisboa 1649-028, Portugal; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Departamento de Ciências e Tecnologia da Biomassa, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, Caparica 2829-516, Portugal; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +351-21-7999503; Fax: +351-21-7999412. Received: 30 May 2012; in revised form: 17 July 2012 / Accepted: 2 August 2012 / Published: 17 August 2012 Abstract: Non-coding RNAs are dominant in the genomic output of the higher organisms being not simply occasional transcripts with idiosyncratic functions, but constituting an extensive regulatory network. Among all the species of non-coding RNAs, small non-coding RNAs (miRNAs, siRNAs and piRNAs) have been shown to be in the core of the regulatory machinery of all the genomic output in eukaryotic cells. Small non-coding RNAs are produced by several pathways containing specialized enzymes that process RNA transcripts. The mechanism of action of these molecules is also ensured by a group of effector proteins that are commonly engaged within high molecular weight protein-RNA complexes.
  • Single-Molecule Imaging Reveals That Argonaute Reshapes the Binding Properties of Its Nucleic Acid Guides

    Single-Molecule Imaging Reveals That Argonaute Reshapes the Binding Properties of Its Nucleic Acid Guides

    Article Single-Molecule Imaging Reveals that Argonaute Reshapes the Binding Properties of Its Nucleic Acid Guides Graphical Abstract Authors William E. Salomon, Samson M. Jolly, Melissa J. Moore, Phillip D. Zamore, Victor Serebrov Correspondence [email protected] (P.D.Z.), [email protected] (V.S.) In Brief Argonaute proteins reshape how oligonucleotides find, bind, and dissociate from complementary nucleic acid sequences. By re-writing the rules, Argonautes allow oligonucleotides to serve as specificity determinants with thermodynamic and kinetic properties more typical of RNA-binding proteins. Highlights d Argonaute changes the rate of target finding by pre-organizing a region of its guide d Seed pairing is required for rapid target finding and stable binding d AGO2 releases its cleaved products by destabilizing their interaction with the guide d RISC makes its guide behave more like an RNA-binding protein and less like free RNA Salomon et al., 2015, Cell 162, 84–95 July 2, 2015 ª2015 Elsevier Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.029 Article Single-Molecule Imaging Reveals that Argonaute Reshapes the Binding Properties of Its Nucleic Acid Guides William E. Salomon,1 Samson M. Jolly,1 Melissa J. Moore,1 Phillip D. Zamore,1,* and Victor Serebrov1,* 1RNA Therapeutics Institute, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] (P.D.Z.), [email protected] (V.S.) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.029 SUMMARY proteins contain an additional N-terminal domain that prevents base pairing of the target to the guide beyond guide position Argonaute proteins repress gene expression and g16 (Kwak and Tomari, 2012; Faehnle et al., 2013; Hauptmann defend against foreign nucleic acids using short et al., 2013).
  • Biochemical Mechanisms of the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex

    Biochemical Mechanisms of the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex

    Zain Paroo et al. npg Cell Research (2007) 17:187-194. npg187 © 2007 IBCB, SIBS, CAS All rights reserved 1001-0602/07 $ 30.00 REVIEW www.nature.com/cr Biochemical mechanisms of the RNA-induced silencing complex Zain Paroo1, Qinghua Liu1, Xiaodong Wang1, 2 1Department of Biochemistry, 2Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, USA In less than 10 years since its inception, RNA interference (RNAi) has had extraordinary impact on biomedical sci- ence. RNAi has been demonstrated to influence numerous biological and disease pathways. Development and adoption of RNAi technologies have been prolific ranging from basic loss-of-function tools, genome-wide screening libraries to pharmaceutical target validation and therapeutic development. However, understanding of the molecular mechanisms of RNAi is far from complete. The purpose of this brief review is to highlight key achievements in elucidating the bio- chemical mechanisms of the RNA-induced silencing complex and to outline major challenges for the field. Keywords: Argonaute, Dicer, dsRBP, RISC, RNA interference Cell Research (2007) 17:187-194. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7310148; published online 20 February 2007 Introduction from longer dsRNA-silencing triggers [3, 6]. The phenomenon of RNA-induced silencing was first Small-interfering RNA documented in plants by Jorgensen and co-workers [1]. The Tuschl and co-workers [7] hypothesized that these field of RNA interference (RNAi) was initiated from studies smaller RNA species directed the activity of the RISC com- conducted by Fire, Mello and co-workers [2], who induced plex. Indeed, chemically synthesized 21mer duplexes were silencing of endogenous and reporter genes in Caenorhab- found to trigger the cleavage of complementary mRNA ditis elegans following injection of long double-stranded in Drosophila extract [7].
  • NON-CODING Rnas

    NON-CODING Rnas

    NON-CODING RNAs Types Synthesis Functions Examples Cells Produce Different Categories of RNA Molecules Noncoding RNAs Are Also Synthesized and Processed in the Nucleus REGULATION OF GENE EXPRESSION BY NONCODING RNAs Small Noncoding RNA Transcripts Regulate Many Animal and Plant Genes Through RNA Interference Three classes of small noncoding RNAs work in this way— microRNAs (miRNAs), small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), and piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) miRNAs Regulate mRNA Translation and Stability. Estimated Over 4000 different microRNAs (miRNAs) are produced from the human genome, and these appear to regulate at least one- third of all human protein-coding genes. RNA interference in eukaryotes. Single-stranded interfering RNAs are generated from double-stranded RNA. They locate target RNAs through base-pairing and, at this point, several fates are possible, as shown. There are several types of RNA interference; the way the double-stranded RNA is produced and processed and the ultimate fate of the target RNA depends on the particular system. miRNA processing and mechanism of action. The precursor miRNA, through complementarity between one part of its sequence and another, forms a double-stranded structure. This RNA is cropped while still in the nucleus and then exported to the cytosol, where it is further cleaved by the Dicer enzyme to form the miRNA proper. Argonaute, in conjunction with other components of RISC, initially associates with both strands of the miRNA and then cleaves and discards one of them. The other strand guides RISC to specific mRNAs through base-pairing. If the RNA–RNA match is extensive, as is commonly seen in plants, Argonaute cleaves the target mRNA, causing its rapid degradation.
  • Bacterial Argonaute Sets Sail

    RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS NPG BACTERIAL PHYSIOLOGY Bacterial argonaute sets sail In eukaryotes, argonaute proteins RNAs (diRNAs)) highlighted a strong To investigate the ability of the have important roles in small RNA- bias towards RNAs that had uridine argonaute protein to recognize for- mediated gene silencing. In a recent at the first position - a feature that eign nucleic acids, the authors used issue of Molecular Cell, Alexei Aravin is also present in many of the small Escherichia coli as a heterologous and colleagues demonstrate a role RNAs bound by eukaryotic argonaute host and found that expression of for a bacterial argonaute protein in proteins. The authors found that R. sphaeroides argonaute reduced the silencing foreign nucleic acids. the diRNAs mapped to the majority yield of the expression plasmid and Argonaute proteins have been of the sense transcripts from the resulted in the degradation of plas- identified in a range of bacteria and R. sphaeroides chromosomes and mid DNA. Comparative analysis of archaea. Although several crystallo­ endogenous plasmids, in addition the transcriptomes of wild-type and graphic structures have been made to showing a strong bias towards the argonaute-deficient R. sphaeroides available, and there has been a argonaute expression plasmid. There showed no difference in overall preliminary characterization of was no evidence of a preference for gene expression; however, when a the substrate-binding properties of a particular primary or secondary plasmid that expressed luciferase some bacterial argonaute proteins, structure in the RNA precursor. and LacI was introduced into the few experimental insights into their This suggests that diRNAs are either R.
  • Argonautes in Extracellular Vesicles: Artifact Or Selected Cargo?

    Argonautes in Extracellular Vesicles: Artifact Or Selected Cargo?

    Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on November 29, 2019; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-2782 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Argonautes in extracellular vesicles: artifact or selected cargo? Alissa M. Weaver1,2, # and James G. Patton1,3,4 1. Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine 2. Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center 3. Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University 4. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center 5. # Correspondence to Alissa M. Weaver, 771 Preston Research Building, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37212 USA. Email: [email protected] Phone: 1-615-936-3529 Running Title: Argonautes as EV cargoes Abbreviations: Ago: Argonaute, EV: extracellular vesicle, miRNA: microRNA, RBP: RNA- binding protein, RISC: RNA-induced silencing complex, TRBP: transactivation response RNA- binding protein, WAGO: worm Argonaute Conflict of Interest Declaration: The authors have no financial conflicts of interest. We have published manuscripts in the area discussed in this “Controversy and Consensus”, which we have referenced. 1 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 26, 2021. © 2019 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on November 29, 2019; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-2782 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Abstract Argonaute-2 (Ago2) is a key component of the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) that mediates downregulation of mRNA by microRNAs. Its presence in extracellular vesicles (EVs) has been postulated to be important for the activity of EV-carried miRNA in modulating gene expression in recipient cells.