Management of Spontaneous Labour at Term in Healthy Women

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Management of Spontaneous Labour at Term in Healthy Women SOGC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE No. 336, September 2016 Management of Spontaneous Labour at Term in Healthy Women This Clinical Practice Guideline has been prepared by the Barbara Parish, MD, Halifax NS Clinical Practice Obstetrics Committee, reviewed by the SPECIAL CONTRIBUTOR Family Physician Advisory, Maternal Fetal Medicine, Medico- Legal and Obstetrical Content Review Committees, and Roanne Preston, MD, Vancouver BC approved by the Board of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Jennifer Hutcheon, PhD, Vancouver BC Corinne Riddell, PhD, Montreal QC PRINCIPAL AUTHORS Disclosure statements have been received from all members of Lily Lee, RN, Vancouver BC the committee. Jessica Dy, MD, Ottawa ON The authors wish to acknowledge the expertise and support of the Hussam Azzam, MD, Thompson MB SOGC Obstetrical Content Review committee in completing this guideline. CLINICAL PRACTICE OBSTETRICS COMMITTEE MEMBERS Hussam Azzam (Chair), MD, Thompson MB Abstract Jon Barrett, MD, Toronto ON Objective: The purpose of this guideline is to provide guidance Anne Biringer, MD, Toronto ON for the intrapartum management of spontaneous labour, whether Kim Campbell, RM, Vancouver BC normal or abnormal, in term, healthy women, and to provide fi Louise Duperron, MD, Kirkland QC guidance in the management of rst and second stage dystocia to increase the likelihood of a vaginal birth and optimize birth Jessica Dy, MD, Ottawa ON outcomes. Ellen Giesbrecht, MD, Vancouver BC Evidence: Published literature was retrieved through searches of Lisa Graves, MD, Toronto ON PubMed and the Cochrane Library in October 2011 using appropriate, controlled vocabulary (e.g., labour pain; labour, Michael Helewa, MD, Winnipeg MB obstetric; dystocia) and key words (e.g., obstetric labor, perineal Ian Lange, MD, Calgary AB care, dysfunctional labor). When appropriate, results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical Lily Lee, RN, Vancouver BC trials, and observational studies. Results were limited to the last 10 Suzanne Muise, MD, Bedford NS years. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline up to June 15, 2015. Values: The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Key Words: management of labour, labour dystocia, first stage Preventive Health Care (Table 1). labour, second stage labour, third stage labour http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2016.04.093 Summary Statements 1. The duration of the first stage of labour increases with maternal age and body mass index. (II-2) e J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2016;38(9):843 865 2. In low-risk nulliparous women in the active phase of labour (i.e., Copyright ª 2016 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of equal to or greater than 4 cm dilatation), progress of cervical Canada/La Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. dilatation greater than or equal to 0.5 cm/hour is considered Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. normal. (II-2) This document reflects emerging clinical and scientific advances on the date issued and is subject to change. The information should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of treatment or procedure to be followed. Local institutions can dictate amendments to these opinions. They should be well documented if modified at the local level. None of these contents may be reproduced in any form without prior written permission of the publisher. SEPTEMBER JOGC SEPTEMBRE 2016 l 843 SOGC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE Table 1. Key to evidence statements and grading of recommendations, using the ranking of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care Quality of evidence assessment* Classification of recommendations† I: Evidence obtained from at least one properly randomized A. There is good evidence to recommend the clinical preventive action controlled trial B. There is fair evidence to recommend the clinical preventive action II-1: Evidence from well-designed controlled trials without C. The existing evidence is conflicting and does not allow to make a randomization recommendation for or against use of the clinical preventive action; II-2: Evidence from well-designed cohort (prospective or retro- however, other factors may influence decision-making spective) or caseecontrol studies, preferably from more than D. There is fair evidence to recommend against the clinical preventive one centre or research group action II-3: Evidence obtained from comparisons between times or places E. There is good evidence to recommend against the clinical preven- with or without the intervention. Dramatic results in uncontrolled tive action experiments (such as the results of treatment with penicillin in L. There is insufficient evidence (in quantity or quality) to make a the 1940s) could also be included in the category recommendation; however, other factors may influence decision- III: Opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical experi- making ence, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees *The quality of evidence reported in these guidelines has been adapted from The Evaluation of Evidence criteria described in the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. †Recommendations included in these guidelines have been adapted from the Classification of Recommendations criteria described in the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. 3. Each labour unit should have a guideline for opioid use during labour 3. Women should be informed of the benefits of upright positioning in that includes the method of action, average and maximum doses, labour and encouraged and assisted to assume whatever positions route of administration, possible maternal and fetal side effects, they find most comfortable. (I-B) precautions, and opioid antagonists and resuscitative measures for 4. Women who are at low risk of requiring general anesthesia should each drug. (III) have the choice to eat or drink as desired or tolerated in labour. (I-A) 4. Epidural analgesia provides the most effective pain relief for women 5. Continuous labour support is recommended for all women in active in labour. The timing of initiation of labour epidural is dependent on labour. Each labour unit should aim to provide the opportunity for ’ the woman s choice once the diagnosis of labour has been estab- each woman to receive continuous 1-to-1 labour support. (I-A) lished. (I) 6. Amniotomy and oxytocin, in addition to other measures, should be Recommendations considered once a diagnosis of dystocia has been made in either the first or second stage of labour. (I-B) 1. Health care providers should delay term labour admission to the birthing unit until active labour (i.e., equal to or greater than 4 cm 7. Women and health care providers should have information about dilatation) is established. (II-2A) coping strategies for early labour and mechanisms for accessing support from caregivers. (III-A) 2. Documentation and communication of labour progress are impor- tant aspects of labour management. Labour and delivery units 8. When appropriate, health care providers should support women in should establish local policy regarding labour documentation, their choice of analgesic options in labour. These may include including partogram use and its application in labour management. pharmacological and non-pharmacological measures. (III-A) (III-A) 9. Each woman should be provided with evidence-based information about labour analgesia options prior to the onset of labour and offered ample opportunity to discuss the risks and benefits of each option available at her planned site of delivery. (III-A) ABBREVIATIONS 10. The use of meperidine as labour analgesia should be avoided due to its long-acting active metabolites and negative effects on AMTSL active management of the third stage of labour neonatal behaviours. (II-2B) BMI body mass index 11. Low-dose epidural, when available, is preferred over high-dose CCT controlled cord traction epidural for labour analgesia and in promoting mobility in labour. (I-A) CLS continuous labour support 12. Women who receive an epidural should be encouraged to maintain mobility and flexibility in positions of comfort throughout labour. (I-B) CS Caesarean section 13. Once an epidural has been established, the infusion should be IUPC intrauterine pressure catheter continued until completion of the third stage of labour. (I-A) IV intravenous 14. Pushing, as a component of second stage progress, may commence OASIS obstetrical anal sphincter injuries when the cervix is fully dilated, the presenting part is confirmed to be PCEA patient-controlled epidural analgesia engaged, and the woman feels an urge to push. (III-A) PPH postpartum hemorrhage 15. Delayed pushing is preferred when the woman has no urge to push, particularly if the presenting part is above station þ2 and/or RCT randomized controlled trial in a non-occiput anterior position, assuming the fetus does not SOGC Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada display abnormal monitoring and the pregnant woman’s status is satisfactory. (I-A) TENS transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation 844 l SEPTEMBER JOGC SEPTEMBRE 2016 Management of Spontaneous Labour at Term in Healthy Women 16. Delay of pushing according to parity and the presence or absence recommended that every obstetrical unit have an identified and of an epidural should follow the time limits described in the text accessible protocol that includes a starting dose, increment in- unless there are extenuating circumstances. (II-2B) terval, and maximum dose. Consistent use of 1 standard 17. The method of pushing, spontaneous or directed with Valsalva approach to oxytocin administration in any 1 obstetrical unit manoeuvre, should be chosen using the woman’s own preference. should be considered. (III-A) fi Directed pushing may assist with the nal expulsion of the head. (II-2B) 23. Operative delivery less than 2 hours after commencing pushing is 18. Avoid the use of routine episiotomy in spontaneous vaginal births. (I-A) not recommended, provided maternal status and fetal surveillance 19. Prophylactic oxytocics should be given after the delivery of the are normal. (III-D) baby.
Recommended publications
  • Sexual Abuse of Elders Kearsley Home 1. Margaret Eckard
    Sexual Abuse of Elders •Kathleen Brown •Associate Professor •University of Pennsylvania •School of Nursing Kearsley Home Retirement home for elderly women Located in West Philadelphia Gothic stone home over 200 years old 60 residents, ages 60-94 Security force on grounds Small in-patient unit; Highly trained staff 1. Margaret Eckard Popular, bubbly 92 year old resident One of longest residents at Kearsley January 23, 1983: missed at breakfast Nurse went to investigate; door ajar Body lying on floor next to rumpled bed Clad in nightgown; curled in fetal position Signs of rigor mortis starting to appear 1 Examination MD concerned over bruises on face; smears of blood around nose and mouth Streaks of blood in vagina and anus Decided not sufficiently disturbing to make an issue; decided natural death due to her age Funeral held 2. Katherine A. Maxwell 85 year old resident February 12, 1983: 21 inch snow storm Katherine failed to show for breakfast Door ajar; body lying on bed Pajamas spotted with blood Storm kept Dr. Webster from the Home Katherine Maxwell Body taken to hospital; no autopsy Blood believed to have occurred by natural causes at her death 2 3. Elizabeth Monroe Celebrated her 86th birthday with a party Next morning, failed to appear at breakfast Nurse found door ajar and her body in bed Face discolored; vaginal bleeding Dr. Webster away; substitute MD Sent body to undertaker Dr. Webster’s Concern Webster called the undertaker; suspicious over the 3 deaths ME’s office were not concerned over the 3 elderly victims’ deaths Webster insistent and ME accepted it for investigation but embalming made it difficult Ruled natural cause death 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Trespasser Fatalities Federal Railroad Administration Demographic and Behavioral Profiles
    U.S. Department of Transportation Rail Trespasser Fatalities Federal Railroad Administration Demographic and Behavioral Profiles June 2013 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Government, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the content or use of the material contained in this document. NOTICE The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. NOTE: This report was prepared by North American Management (NAM) at the direction of the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for the purpose of more accurately identifying the types of persons who trespass on railroad rights-of-way, and ultimately reducing the number of trespassing casualties, which contribute significantly to the total annual railroad-related deaths and injuries in the United States. This report is an extension of a March 2008 report produced by Cadle Creek Consulting titled, “Rail Trespasser Fatalities, Developing Demographic Profiles” (2008 Report). The entire 2008 Report can be found at http://www.fra.dot.gov/eLib/Details/L02669. The current report was generated as part of FRA’s continuing efforts to reduce trespassing on railroad rights-of-way and associated fatalities and injuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivera's Opening Brief
    No. 09-1060 ________________________________________________________________________ In the Appellate Court of Illinois Second District PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellee, ) Appeal from the ) Nineteenth Judicial ) Circuit Court ) v. ) Case. No. 92 CF 2751 ) JUAN A. RIVERA, JR., ) Hon. Christopher C. Starck ) Judge Presiding. Defendant-Appellant. ) ________________________________________________________________________ BRIEF OF DEFENDANT-APPELLANT JUAN A. RIVERA, JR. ________________________________________________________________________ Lawrence Marshall Counsel of Record Stanford Law School 559 Nathan Abbott Way Stanford, California 94306 Thomas P. Sullivan Jane E. Raley Terri L. Mascherin Jeffrey Urdangen Jenner & Block LLP Bluhm Legal Clinic 353 N. Clark Street Northwestern University Chicago, Illinois 60654 School of Law 357 E. Chicago Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60611 Counsel for Defendant-Appellant Juan A. Rivera, Jr. ________________________________________________________________________ ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED i _____________________________________________________________________ POINTS AND AUTHORITIES NATURE OF THE CASE ...................................................................................................1 JURISDICTION ..................................................................................................................1 ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW ...............................................................................1 STATEMENT OF FACTS ..................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of MISSOURI, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) V. ) No. SD35688 ) Filed: May 15, 2020 CHRISTOPHER L. PASCHALL, ) ) Defendant-Appellant
    STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) v. ) No. SD35688 ) Filed: May 15, 2020 CHRISTOPHER L. PASCHALL, ) ) Defendant-Appellant. ) APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF NEWTON COUNTY Honorable Jack Goodman, Special Judge AFFIRMED Christopher Paschall (Defendant) was charged by amended information, as a prior and persistent offender, with two counts of first-degree murder, three counts of armed criminal action (ACA), and one count of parental kidnapping. See § 565.020 RSMo (2000); § 571.015 RSMo (2000); § 565.153 RSMo Cum. Supp. (2014). These six charges were based upon allegations that: (1) Defendant knowingly shot and killed Casey Brace, the mother of his two children (Mother); (2) Defendant knowingly shot and killed Mother’s grandfather, Herbert Townsend (Grandfather); and (3) Defendant kidnapped his youngest child (Child). After a jury trial, Defendant was found guilty on all charges. He was sentenced to imprisonment terms of two life sentences without parole for the murder convictions; 60 years, 20 years and 90 years for the ACA convictions; and 7 years for the kidnapping conviction. All sentences were to run consecutively. Defendant presents one point for decision. He contends the trial court erred by admitting testimony from two witnesses that Grandfather told them the person who shot him was Defendant. According to Defendant, “the statements were inadmissible hearsay and did not fall into the dying declaration exception[.]” Finding no merit to this argument, we affirm. Factual and Procedural Background We view the evidence and all reasonable inferences derived therefrom in the light most favorable to the verdict. State v. Belton, 153 S.W.3d 307, 309 (Mo.
    [Show full text]
  • Spinning Babies Core Principles for Spinning Babies® Parent Educators
    Spinning Babies Core Principles for Spinning Babies® Parent Educators Mission of the Spinning Babies® Parent Educator Promoting awareness of the Spinning Babies approach among parents to optimize pregnancy comfort and birth ease (body balance and function) with attention to fetal position. Values Values express our core beliefs that guide and motivate our attitudes and actions, including those stated in our contracts and guidelines, rules and requirements. Our values emphasize solutions which are physiologically appropriate for pregnancy and birth. We understand that, due to limits within the field of research, that not all valuable care is evidence based. We value the non-invasive, non-stressing physiological approach to comfort and function. We value options that avoid taxing the person’s financial or physical resources. Our commitment is to de-emphasize language which states one fetal position as optimal or good and another as bad, and which assumes that a particular plan of action will assure a particular result. Respect for the person of the patient or client avoids force in treatment, communication, belief or ideology, and in professional and social interactions. Tolerance for the range of birth providers, bodywork modalities and practice styles allow for the broad application of concepts and principles regardless of birth plan or birth setting. All pregnant parents are treated with fairness, kindness and a non-bias recognition of the inherent value of every individual. All professions are spoken of with respect. Our bias towards physiology doesn’t excuse discrediting professionals who practice in a technological, medical model. The person is not the ideology. Prioritizing physiological treatment appropriate to each parent and baby may enhance health.
    [Show full text]
  • SC07-841 Merits Initial Brief
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RICHARD KNIGHT, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) CASE NO. SC07-841 STATE OF FLORIDA, ) L.T. NO. 01-14055 CF 10A ) Appellee. ) ) _______________________________ INITIAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT ___________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida ___________________________________________________________________ MELODEE A. SMITH Florida Bar No. 33121 LAW OFFICES OF MELODEE A. SMITH 101 NE Third Ave. Suite 1500 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Tel: (954) 522.9297 Fax: (954) 522.9298 [email protected] Attorney for Appellant TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS . i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES . iii PRELIMINARY STATEMENT . 1 JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT . 1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS . 2 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT . .. 41 ARGUMENT: I. THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN REFUSING TO GRANT A MISTRIAL BASED ON FAMILY WITNESS MULLINGS’ COMMENT IN JURORS’ PRESENCE THAT HE KNEW KNIGHT TO HAVE A “VIOLENT BACKGROUND” . 42 II. THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN REFUSING TO GRANT A MISTRIAL BASED ON JURORS’ HAVING BEEN EXPOSED TO THE FACT THAT KNIGHT HAD BEEN WEARING BOTH HANDCUFFS AND LEG SHACKLES DURING THE GUILT PHASE OF JURY TRIAL . 48 III. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN RULING THAT NO DISCOVERY VIOLATION OCCURRED AND IN REFUSING TO GRANT A MISTRIAL WHEN THE STATE’S DNA EXPERT GAVE A NEW OPINION UNDISCLOSED PRIOR TO TRIAL THAT DID NOT EXCLUDE KNIGHT AS A DONOR OF KEY DNA EVIDENCE FROM WHICH THE EXPERT’S LAB EARLIER EXCLUDED KNIGHT . 50 IV. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN REFUSING TO SEAT A NEW JURY PANEL FOR PURPOSES OF THE PENALTY PHASE OF TRIAL BASED ON FAMILY WITNESS MULLINGS’ COMMENT IN THE JURY’S PRESENCE DURING THE GUILT PHASE PROCEEDINGS THAT MULLINGS KNEW KNIGHT HAD A “VIOLENT BACKGROUND” .
    [Show full text]
  • Roe V. House: a Dialogue on Abortion Katie Condit Cedarville University
    Cedarville University DigitalCommons@Cedarville CedarEthics Online Center for Bioethics Fall 2007 Roe v. House: A Dialogue on Abortion Katie Condit Cedarville University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/cedar_ethics_online Part of the Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons Recommended Citation Condit, Katie, "Roe v. House: A Dialogue on Abortion" (2007). CedarEthics Online. 28. http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/cedar_ethics_online/28 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Cedarville, a service of the Centennial Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in CedarEthics Online by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Cedarville. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Roe v. House: A Dialogue on Abortion by Katie Condit It is a typical day in Princeton Plainsboro Hospital. Paramedics are hurriedly escorting trauma patients into the emergency room, nurses are attending to the many demands of patient needs, and Doctor Gregory House, famous diagnostician, is lounging in his office watching an episode of General Hospital. A small woman enters the hospital. She is about sixty years old, and it is evident that she has an important task to accomplish. With a glint of wisdom in her eyes, she approaches the information desk and requests to know where Dr. House’s office is. The secretary directs her to the elevators, and the woman sets off to see the noted physician. The woman calls herself Norma McCorvey, but you are more likely to recognize her as Jane Roe, the woman that helped launch the nation into a legal frenzy over the rights of women and the rights of the unborn child in the Roe v.
    [Show full text]
  • Malpositions of the Occiput and Malpresentations
    31 Malpositions of the occiput and malpresentations Terri Coates CHAPTER CONTENTS Occipitoposterior positions 574 Management of labour 593 Causes 574 Complications 599 Antenatal diagnosis 574 Shoulder presentation 600 Diagnosis during labour 576 Causes 600 Care in labour 576 Antenatal diagnosis 601 Mechanism of right occipitoposterior position Intrapartum diagnosis 601 (long rotation) 577 Possible outcome 601 Possible course and outcomes of labour 578 Management 602 Complications 581 Complications 602 Face presentation 581 Unstable lie 602 Causes 581 Causes 602 Antenatal diagnosis 582 Management 603 Intrapartum diagnosis 582 Complications 603 Mechanism of a left mentoanterior Compound presentation 603 position 583 REFERENCES 603 Possible course and outcomes of labour 584 FURTHER READING 604 Management of labour 585 Complications 585 Brow presentation 586 Causes 586 Diagnosis 586 Management 587 Complications 587 Breech presentation 587 Types of breech presentation and position 587 Causes 588 Antenatal diagnosis 589 Diagnosis during labour 589 Antenatal management 590 Persistent breech presentation 592 Mechanism of left sacroanterior position 593 573 574 LABOUR occupy the roomier hindpelvis. The oval shape of the Malpositions and malpresentations of the fetus anthropoid pelvis, with its narrow transverse diameter, present the midwife with a challenge of favours a direct occipitoposterior position. recognition and diagnosis both in the antenatal period and during labour. Antenatal diagnosis This chapter aims to: Abdominal examination • outline the causes of these positions and presentations Listen to the mother • discuss the midwife’s diagnosis and management The mother may complain of backache and she may • describe the possible outcomes. feel that her baby’s bottom is very high up against her ribs.
    [Show full text]
  • ABDOMINAL PALPATION to DETERMINE FETAL POSITION at the ONSET of LABOUR: an ACCURACY STUDY By
    ABDOMINAL PALPATION TO DETERMINE FETAL POSITION AT THE ONSET OF LABOUR: AN ACCURACY STUDY by SARA SAMANTHA WEBB A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology School of Clinical & Experimental Medicine College of Medical & Dental Sciences The University of Birmingham September 2009 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT Since the late 19th Century, abdominal palpation of the gravid uterus has been routine, worldwide obstetric practice to determine fetal position. A systematic review showed a dearth of research on the accuracy of this ubiquitous test. A test accuracy study was carried out prospectively to assess accuracy of abdominal palpation (index test) to identify the Left-Occipito-Anterior (LOA) fetal position at the onset of labour, in nulliparous women over 37 weeks’ gestation, with ultrasound as the reference standard. Trained observers blind to the index test results performed the ultrasound independently. Midwives palpation data on the position of 629 women were obtained and 61 (9%) fetuses were verified as LOA by ultrasound. The sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratio of abdominal palpation to detect LOA position were 34% (23- 46), 71% (67-74) and 1.2 (0.83-1.74) respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Purpose Synopsis of Event the Criminal Investigation LVMPD
    Office of Internal Oversight Review Key Findings, Conclusions, and/or Recommendations of an Officer-Involved Shooting: Non-Fatal 3520 Maule Avenue – January 27,2019 Purpose The purpose of this report is to publish key findings, conclusions, and/or recommendations of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department’s (LVMPD) internal review of this incident. There are a variety of actions that can be taken administratively in response to the Department’s review of a deadly force incident. The review may reveal no action is required or determine additional training is appropriate for all officers in the workforce, or only for the involved officer(s). The review may reveal the need for changes in Department policies, procedures, or rules. Where Departmental rules have been violated, formal discipline may be appropriate. The goal of the review is to improve both individual and Department performance. Synopsis of Event On January 27, 2019, at approximately 1235 hours, the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (LVMPD) was involved in a critical incident under LVMPD Event LLV190100125940. The incident occurred near 3520 Maule Avenue, Las Vegas, NV 89118. This address was located within the LVMPD Enterprise Area Command (EAC); sector beat Ocean 1 (O1). The incident was an officer-involved shooting (OIS). Sergeant Jeffrey Blum was the involved officer. Sergeant Blum discharged his firearm at suspect Torred De Leon, who was armed with a walking cane. Prior to the OIS, a person reporting (PR) called 911 reporting De Leon shattered the front window of their residence with a rock. The PR stated De Leon fled, on foot, down the street to a neighbor’s residence.
    [Show full text]
  • FETAL DEATH EVALUATION PROTOCOL Iowa Department of Public Health
    FETAL DEATH EVALUATION PROTOCOL Iowa Department of Public Health Iowa Department of Public Health 321 E. 12th Street Lucas State Office Building Des Moines, Iowa 50319-0075 2005/Revised 2011 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 SURVEILLANCE FETAL DEATH EVALUATION FORM ......................................................................................................................................... 5 MATERNAL/FAMILY INTERVIEW .............................................................................................................................................................................. 7 ASSESSMENT FORM ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 GRIEF AND FAMILY SUPPORT .................................................................................................................................................................................. 15 FOLLOW-UP ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Instrumental Vaginal Birth (C-Obs
    Instrumental vaginal birth This statement has been developed and Values: The evidence was reviewed by the reviewed by the Women’s Health Women’s Health Committee (RANZCOG), Committee and approved by the RANZCOG and applied to local factors relating to Board and Council. Australia and New Zealand. A list of Women’s Health Committee Validation: This statement was compared Members can be found in Appendix D. with RCOG, ACOG and SOGC Guidelines on instrumental vaginal birth. Disclosure statements have been received from all members of this committee. Background: This statement was first developed by Women’s Health Committee in July 2002. During the statements review in Disclaimer This information is intended to November 2015 Rotational Forceps (C-Obs provide general advice to practitioners. This 13) was incorporated to create one information should not be relied on as a statement on Instrumental Vaginal Birth. substitute for proper assessment with respect to the particular circumstances of each Funding: This statement was developed by case and the needs of any patient. This RANZCOG and there are no relevant document reflects emerging clinical and financial disclosures. scientific advances as of the date issued and is subject to change. The document has been prepared having regard to general circumstances. First endorsed by RANZCOG: July 2002 Current: March 2020 Review due: March 2023 1 Table of contents 1. Plain language summary .......................................................................................................... 3 2.
    [Show full text]