Eski̇şehi̇r Alpu Coal-Fired Power Plant Health Impact Assessment Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eski̇şehi̇r Alpu Coal-Fired Power Plant Health Impact Assessment Report ESKİŞEHİR ALPU COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Right to Clean Air Platform About Right to Clean Air Platform: Right to Clean Air Platform consists of 16 professional organizations and NGOs working on air pollution and health impacts in Turkey since 2015. The aim of the Platform is to advocate for the right to live in an environment with clean air and to protect the public health from air pollution, especially resulting from the existing and the planned coal-fired power plants in Turkey. Platform Constituents are: • Association of Public Health Professionals (HASUDER) • CAN Europe • General Practitioner Association of Turkey • Greenpeace Mediterranean • Green Peace Law Association • Green Thought Association • Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL) • Physicians for Environment Association • TEMA Foundation (The Turkish Foundation for Combating Soil Erosion, for Reforestation and the Protection of Natural Habitats) • Turkish Medical Association (TTB) • Turkish Neurological Society • Turkish Respiratory Society (TÜSAD) • Turkish Society of Occupational Health Specialists (İMUD) • Yuva Association • WWF Turkey • 350.org Date: August 2020 Submission Design : Erkan Güner Prepared by : Buket Atlı Yiğit Tekşen Main writer: : Prof. Dr. Nilay Etiler (Turkish Medical Association) Co-writers: : Ayşe Yıkıcı (City Planner) Onur Akgül (Greenpeace Mediterranean) We would like to thank to the following people due to their valuable contributions to the report; Hidayet Açar (Tepebaşı Municipality), Lauri Myllyvirta (CREA- Energy and Clean Air Research Center), Levent Özbunar (TMMOB Chamber of Agricultural Engineers Eskişehir Branch, Eskişehir Metropolitan © Zhao Gang/Greenpeace Municipality City Council), Hasan Sofuoğlu (Tepebaşı Municipality) and Sinem Yanar Şaylan (Eskişehir Metropolitan Municipality) This report is printed on recycled paper. Table Of Contents ABBREVIATIONS....................................................................................................4 FOREWORD.............................................................................................................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.........................................................................................6 1. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................11 1.1. Description of health impact assessment....................................................11 1.2. Project introduction..........................................................................................13 1.3. Location of the project.....................................................................................14 2. METHODOLOGY................................................................................................19 2.1. Screening...............................................................................................................21 2.2. Scoping................................................................................................................26 2.3. Evaluation...........................................................................................................29 2.4. Data and Data Sources...............................................................................33 2.5. Analysis................................................................................................................33 3. COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS.....................................................................35 3.1. What is Coal-Fired Power Plants?...............................................................35 3.2. State of Coal-Fired Power Plantss in the World....................................35 3.3. Coal-Fired Power Plants in Turkey............................................................39 3.4. Risks of Coal-Fired Power Plant in Terms of their Impacts on Ecosyste......42 3.5. Case Study..........................................................................................................43 3.6. Eects of a Coal-Fired Power Plant on the Life, Resources and of Cities in the Climate Crisis Perio Planning.......................................45 4. IMPACTS OF COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS ON COMMUNITY HEALTH......47 4.1. Health Problems Caused by Fosil Fuels..........................................................47 4.2. COVID-19 and Air Pollution...................................................................................52 4.3. Particles Causing Health Problems When Burning Coal........................54 4.3.1. Particulate Matter (PM)........................................................................................54 4.3.2. Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)..............................................................................................55 4.3.3. Nitrogen Oxides (NOx).......................................................................................55 4.3.4. Heavy Metals............................................................................................................56 4.3.5. Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)...........................................................57 4.3.6. Ashes............................................................................................................57 4.4. Health-Related Consequences of Coal Mining...........................................58 4.5. Climate Change and Health.................................................................................59 5. IMPACT ANALYSIS...........................................................................................61 5.1. Characteristics of The Region and The Population...............................61 5.1.1. General Features of the Region...............................................................61 5.1.2. Physical-Ecological Structure....................................................................61 5.1.2.1. Topographic..................................................................................................62 5.1.2.2. Geological.....................................................................................................62 5.1.2.3. Climate...........................................................................................................62 5.1.2.4. Meteorological............................................................................................63 5.1.2.5. Wind Direction............................................................................................64 © Lu Guang/Greenpeace 5.1.2.6. Hydrological................................................................................................................65 5.1.2.7. Flora................................................................................................................................66 5.1.2.8. Fauna..............................................................................................................................67 5.1.2.9. Terrain Characteristics............................................................................................68 5.1.3. Characteristics of the Population to be Aected..............................................68 5.1.3.1. Immigration................................................................................................................106 5.1.3.2. Fertility Level.............................................................................................................106 5.1.4. Socioeconomic Status...............................................................................................107 5.1.4.1. Economy......................................................................................................................107 5.1.5 Economic Activity Areas of the Working Population/Working Life.........110 5.1.6. Agricultural Production…………………………….....................................................…… 11 0 5.1.7. Health Profile in the Region.......................................................................................112 5.1.8. Sensitive Population Groups....................................................................................114 5.1.9. The Current State of the Environment..................................................................115 5.1.9.1. Functions of the Project Area According to the Current Situation.........115 5.1.9.2. Air Quality in Eskişehir.............................................................................................116 5.2. Evaluation of The Health Impacts of The Project...............................................121 5.2.1. Environmental Health Problems to be Caused by the Project.....................121 5.2.1.1. Air Emissions...............................................................................................................123 5.2.1.2. Premature Deaths....................................................................................................126 5.2.1.3. Impacts on Pregnancy and Reproduction.................................................... 12 7 5.2.2. Health Costs Due to Air Pollution Generated by the Power Plant .........128 5.2.2.1. Liquid and Solid Wastes........................................................................................129 5.2.2.2. Noise............................................................................................................................129 5.2.3. Health Impacts Caused by the Exposure of Agricultural Lands.................131 5.2.4. Eects of the Power Plant on Occupational Health............................................. 5.2.5. Impacts on Employment and Income................................................................138
Recommended publications
  • Edge of Sakarya Plain Subregions: the West
    Odonatologica38(4): 293-306 December 1, 2009 Odonata of the Western Black Sea Region of Turkey, with taxonomic notes and species list of the region N. Hacet Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Trakya University, TR-22030 Edirne, Turkey [email protected] Received January 26, 2009 / Revised and Accepted July 14, 2009 40 spp./sspp. from 58 localities were recorded during 2003 and 2005-2007. Sym- lindenii Somatochlora meridionalis, Orthetrum pecmafusca, Erythromma , albistylum and Sympetrum pedemontanum are new for the region. S. meridionalis records are the within its distribution of other is dis- easternmost range. Geographical some spp. cussed, and notes on the morphology and taxonomic status of the regional Calop- The teryx splendens, C. virgo, Ischnura elegans and Cordulegaster insignisareprovided. distributions of Coenagrionpulchellum, C. scitulum, Pyrrhosoma n. nymphula, Aesh- na cyanea, Cordulia aeneaand Sympetrum depressiusculum in Turkey are still largely unknown. Based on all available records, a list of the 51 spp./sspp. currently known from the Western Black Sea Region is presented. INTRODUCTION The Black Sea Region extends from the eastern edge of Sakarya plain in the West, to Georgia in the East. It is divided in three subregions: the West, Centre and East (Fig. 1). The Western Black Sea Region studied extends from the East of Sakarya plain and Bilecik province to the West of the Ktzihrmak delta. It in- cludes the northernparts of Ankara and Cankm provinces, and the eastern parts of Sakarya and Bilecik provinces (Fig.l). Physically, the North Anatolianmountainsextend in East-West direction and cut rich water such brooks and are by sources, as streams, ponds.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 YILI FAALİYET RAPORU.Pdf
    SAKARYA İL TARIM ve ORMAN MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ 2018 YILI FAALİYET ÖZETİ SAKARYA ARALIK-2018 1 SAKARYA İL TARIM VE ORMAN MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ İl ve İlçe Müdürlükleri Personel Durumu Sakarya İl Tarım ve Orman Müdürlüğü 1 İl Müdürü, 3 İl Müdür Yardımcısı, 8 Şube Müdürü, 16 İlçe Müdürü yönetiminde toplam 516 personelle hizmetlerini yürütmektedir. Su Ürünleri SAKARYA İL TARIM VE ORMAN Ziraat Vet.Sağ. Ziraat Mühendisi Gıda Mühendisi Müh.- Balıkçılık Veteriner Hekim Teknis/Tekn. Tekns/Tekn. MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ Tek.Müh. Norm 4/A 4/B Norm 4/A 4/B Norm 4/A Norm 4/A 4/B Norm 4/A Norm 4/A ARAZİ TOP. VE TARIM.ALT YAPI ŞB.MD. 14 9 1 - 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 3 2 - 0 ÇAYIR, MERA VE YEM BİT.ŞB. 3 0 - 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 BİTKİSEL ÜRETİM VE SAĞ.ŞB.MD. 26 13 2 - 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 5 3 - 0 HAYVAN SAĞLIĞI YETİŞ.ŞB.MD. 4 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 19 8 6 - 0 5 3 BALIKÇILIK VE SU ÜRÜNLERİ ŞB.MD. - 0 0 - 0 0 8 7 1 0 0 - 0 - 0 KOORDİNASYON VE TAR.VER.ŞB.MD. 5 6 0 - 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 5 2 - 0 KIRSAL KALKINMA VE ÖRGÜT.ŞB.MD. 16 6 0 - 0 0 - 0 2 1 0 4 2 - 0 GIDA VE YEM ŞB.MD. 13 1 1 31 5 5 - 0 19 7 2 - 0 - 0 İL MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ TOPLAMI 78 38 4 31 5 5 8 7 41 16 8 17 9 5 3 ADAPAZARI 16 8 3 6 5 1 1 0 19 11 1 6 2 4 2 AKYAZI 12 4 4 2 0 1 2 0 12 6 0 5 1 3 2 ARİFİYE 4 4 1 1 1 0 - 1 2 2 0 2 2 2 1 ERENLER 9 7 1 2 4 0 - 0 9 6 1 6 2 2 0 FERİZLİ 9 1 3 1 0 1 - 0 5 1 0 6 1 3 0 GEYVE 15 2 5 1 0 1 - 0 8 3 3 9 1 3 2 HENDEK 15 8 3 2 0 1 2 0 13 8 1 5 2 3 1 KARAPÜRÇEK 4 3 0 - 0 0 - 0 2 2 1 2 0 2 0 KARASU 19 4 3 2 1 1 3 2 9 5 2 7 1 3 2 KAYNARCA 12 6 3 - 0 0 1 1 11 5 2 7 0 3 2 KOCAALİ 18 3 4 1 0 0 1 0 4 2 1 5 1 2 2 PAMUKOVA 9 3 4 1 0 1 1 0 5 4 1 5 2 3 1 SAPANCA
    [Show full text]
  • SIRA NO Yatırımcı Adı İl İlçe Köy Hibe Tutar Hibe Esas Tutar Ayni Katkı
    Hibe Esas Yatırımcı Adı İl İlçe Köy Hibe Tutar Ayni Katkı Toplam Tutar SIRA NO Tutar 1 YÜCEL AKKURT ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 12961,9 25923,8 28038,2 53962 2 VEDAT SAMİ AKYILDIZ ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 4910,725 9821,45 3301,05 13122,5 3 YUSUF AKYILDIZ ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 26473,175 52946,35 12932,65 65879 4 HALİL İBRAHİM AYDÖRE ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 52453,75 104907,5 30656,5 135564 5 SERDAR AYDÖRE ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 37781,05 75562,1 30622,47 106184,57 6 MUHİTTİN AYDÖRE ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 15443,3 30886,6 12069,01 42955,61 7 ŞÜKRAN BOLAT ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 8272,95 16545,9 6120,27 22666,17 8 YILMAZ ÜRKER ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 7993,835 15987,67 3229,68 19217,35 9 MESUT ERSEN ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 24693,9 49387,8 7551,35 56939,15 10 FEHMİ BOLAT ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 18206,295 36412,59 7949,28 44361,87 11 NAZIM VAR ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 18891,4 37782,8 12904,2 50687 12 ÖMER ULUDAĞ ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 8307,645 16615,29 5278,25 21893,54 13 AHMET GENCEL ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 17527,8 35055,6 11970,4 47026 14 İSMAİL ÖZÜTOK ESKİŞEHİR ALPU AKTEPE 13893,61 27787,22 8308,07 36095,29 15 HALİM SONUÇAR ESKİŞEHİR ALPU BAHÇECİK 6667,41 13334,82 3031,18 16366 16 SALİM GÖKDEMİR ESKİŞEHİR ALPU BAHÇECİK 18176,25 36352,5 5710 42062,5 17 ÜMİT KARACA ESKİŞEHİR ALPU BAHÇECİK 15134,56 30269,12 5368,38 35637,5 18 İBRAHİM TOPÇU ESKİŞEHİR ALPU BAHÇECİK 19736,745 39473,49 7992,09 47465,58 19 TURAN ÇOLAK ESKİŞEHİR ALPU BOZAN 6706,1 13412,2 2020,8 15433 20 NURETTİN ÖZKARA ESKİŞEHİR ALPU BOZAN 6994,67 13989,34 2175,66 16165 21 BEYTULLAH EVCİN ESKİŞEHİR ALPU BOZAN
    [Show full text]
  • Afyonkarahisar İlinde Yükselti Basamaklarına Göre Arazi Kullanımı
    COĞRAFİ BİLİMLER DERGİSİ CBD 8 (1), 57-76 (2010) Afyonkarahisar İlinde Yükselti Basamaklarına Göre Arazi Kullanımı Land use for elevational zones in Afyonkarahisar province Barış Taş*, Mustafa Yakar Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, Coğrafya Bölümü, Afyonkarahisar Öz: Arazi kullanımı, coğrafya araştırmalarında doğal ortam ile insan arasındaki ilişkilerin ortaya konması bakımından oldukça önemli bir yere sahiptir. Yükselti ile birlikte doğal ortamda meydana gelen değişimler, yeryüzünün en önemli kullanıcısı olan insanın gerçekleştirdiği faaliyetleri etkilemektedir. Afyonkarahisar ili, yükselti faktörü ile birlikte doğal şartlarının değişim gösterdiği ve buna bağlı olarak beşeri faaliyetlerin de farklılaştığı bir konumda bulunmaktadır. Her yükselti kuşağının sahip olduğu imkân ve potansiyelin bir diğerinden farklı olmasından ötürü, her basamakta insanın araziyi kullanım biçimleri de farklılaşmaktadır. Nüfus ve yerleşmelerin yoğunlaştığı 900-1300 metre kuşağı, Afyonkarahisar ilinde arazi kullanımının da yoğunlaştığı kuşak durumundadır. Yerleşim alanları, sanayi alanları ve tarım alanları, 900-1300 metre yükselti aralığında kümelenmiştir. 1300 metre yükseltiden itibaren doğal ortamda insan faaliyetlerini olumsuz yönde etkileyici değişimler yaşanmaktadır. Bu durum yerleşmeler ile birlikte tarım ve sanayi gibi kullanım tarzlarının azalmasına, orman ve otlak gibi kullanım biçimlerinin ön plana çıkmasına neden olmuştur. Özellikle 1400 metreden itibaren sık orman alanlarının yoğunlaşması, yağışın artması ile ilişkilidir. 1600
    [Show full text]
  • Manuscript Title
    2 1 Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, XX, XX-XX, XXXX 2 DOI: 10.33988/auvfd.799114 3 4 Determination of goat milk cost and assessment 5 of factors affecting the profitability of Saanen 6 goat enterprises in Çanakkale province, Turkey 7 8 Arzu GÖKDAİ1,a,, Engin SAKARYA1,b 9 10 1Ankara University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Animal Health 11 Economics and Management, Ankara, Turkey. 12 aORCID: 0000-0002-5509-2171; bORCID: 0000-0003-3569-3292. 13 Corresponding author: [email protected] 14 Received date: 25.09.2020 - Accepted date: 15.06.2021 15 16 Abstract: The aim of this study is to determine the cost of goat milk in Saanen goat 17 enterprises in Çanakkale province and to examine the factors affecting profitability in 18 enterprises. The material of the study consists of 92 Saanen goat enterprises. The 19 enterprises have been grouped according to their animal density; as 25-75 heads (small- 20 scale), 76-150 heads (medium-scale) and 151 heads and above (large-scale). The findings 21 of the enterprises for 2017 were determined by descriptive statistics, and multiple 22 regression analysis was used to determine the factors affecting the total profitability of 23 the enterprises. Since feed costs represented 46.22% of total production cost, it was 24 followed by labour costs (27.19%), fuel costs (5.44%) and veterinarian-health service 3 25 costs (5.19%). The cost of 1 L milk and absolute profit in enterprises was determined as 26 0.42/0.01 $/kg in small-scale, 0.41/0.02 $/kg in medium-scale and 0.38/0.05 $/kg in large- 27 scale enterprises, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology Publishes a Wide Variety of Papers
    _____________Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 15, No. 1, January 2020__________ 269 A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF LEAF-BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) IN TURKEY USING DATA OF SPECIMENS IN NAZİFE TUATAY PLANT PROTECTION MUSEUM (TURKEY, ANKARA) Hüseyin Özdikmen*, Neslihan Bal* and Didem Coral Şahin** * Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Gazi University, 06500 Ankara, TURKEY. E- mail: [email protected]; [email protected] ** Directorate of Plant Protection Central Research Institute, Ankara, TURKEY. E-mail: [email protected] [Özdikmen, H., Bal, N. & Coral Şahin, D. 2020. A contribution to the knowledge of leaf-beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Turkey using data of specimens in Nazife Tuatay Plant Protection Museum (Turkey, Ankara). Munis Entomology & Zoology, 15 (1): 269-297] ABSTRACT: In this study, material belonging to nine subfamilies of Chrysomelidae housed in the collection of Nazife Tuatay Plant Protection Museum (NTM) (Turkey, Ankara) have been evaluated. A total of 121 species of 41 genera have been presented. Among those Smaragdina concolor concolor (Fabricius, 1792) and Podagrica malvae semirufa (Küster, 1847) are the first record for Turkey. Also, Labidostomis metallica metallica Lefèvre, 1872, Chrysolina anceyi anceyi (Marseul, 1868), Aphthona pallida (Bach, 1859) and Longitarsus callidus Warchałowski, 1967 are the second reports for Turkey. Additional new provincial and regional records for many species have been given. KEY WORDS: Fauna, Chrysomelidae, the leaf beetles, Turkey, biodiversity The Chrysomelidae fauna of Turkey has been studied by many foreign and native scientists. Recent studies of Löbl & Smetana (2010), Warchalowski (2010), Ekiz et al. (2013), Özdikmen (2014a,b), Özdikmen & Cihan (2014), Özdikmen & Kavak (2014), Özdikmen & Kaya (2014), Özdikmen & Mercan (2014), Özdikmen & Özbek (2014) and Özdikmen & Topcu (2014) have great importance for Chrysomelidae fauna of Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology Publishes a Wide Variety of Papers
    441 _____________Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 13, No. 2, June 2018__________ RARE LEAF BEETLES RECORDS FOR THE FAUNA OF TURKEY (CHRYSOMELIDAE) Neslihan Bal*, Hüseyin Özdikmen*, Hakan Özdamar* and Suat Kıyak* * Gazi University, Science Faculty, Department of Biology, 06500 Ankara, TURKEY. E- mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] [Bal, N., Özdikmen, H., Özdamar, H. & Kıyak, S. 2018. Rare leaf beetles records for the fauna of Turkey (Chrysomelidae). Munis Entomology & Zoology, 13 (2): 441-446] ABSTRACT: We had the opportunity to study some rare material of Chrysomelidae collected during the expedition of Çankırı province in 2013-2015. As a result of this, a total of 10 rare species (3 species of Donaciinae, 1 species of Clytrinae, 2 species of Chrysomelinae and 4 species of Galerucinae) of Turkish leaf beetles were determined. All species are the first record for Çankırı province. Especially, 5 species of them are the second records for Turkey as Donacia cinerea Herbst in after 43 years and Plateumaris consimilis (Schrank) in after 7 years to the subfamily Donaciinae, Chrysolina analis (Linnaeus) in after 7 years and Colaphellus sophiae amasiae Machatschke in after 64 years to the subfamily Chrysomelinae, Calomicrus circumfusus (Marsham) in after 4 years and Luperus floralis Faldermann in after 15 years to the subfamily Galerucinae. In addition 5 of them are the new records for Western Black Sea region of Turkey, and also 4 of them are the new records for Central Anatolian region of Turkey. KEY WORDS: Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, fauna, new records, Çankırı, Turkey This work is based on the specimens collected from Çankırı province.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Social Sciences Teacher Candidates' Epistemological Beliefs: a Validation and Reliability Study of Scale
    Universal Journal of Educational Research 5(12B): 76-85, 2017 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2017.051409 Assessment of Social Sciences Teacher Candidates' Epistemological Beliefs: A Validation and Reliability Study of Scale Yaşar Kop*, Özden Demir Faculty of Education, Kafkas University, Turkey Copyright©2017 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License Abstract This research mainly aims to test the that has been intertwined with the society and the scientific reliability and validity of the Epistemological Beliefs Scale values and elements of the society in accordance with its developed by Kop and Demir (2014) on the level of social nature. In addition to the fact that a good social sciences sciences teaching from Faculty of Education. A total of 176 teacher should have the social and universal knowledge, students participated in the study, which was carried out on constantly developing themselves in the field is a necessity 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th grades of the Social Sciences Teaching in today's global world. Moreover, a positive belief on that Department from the Faculty of Education in Kafkas knowledge can be gained after an effective endeavor will University. An exploratory and confirmatory factor contribute to teachers in awareness of high level thinking analysis was performed for the construct validity of the processes and maturation of this understanding, in scale. Within the scope of reliability studies, the internal selecting the learning path they need, in entering into more consistency (Cronbach Alpha) coefficients of the items qualified dialogue with their students, in planning and were examined.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology and History of Lydia from the Early Lydian Period to Late Antiquity (8Th Century B.C.-6Th Century A.D.)
    Dokuz Eylül University – DEU The Research Center for the Archaeology of Western Anatolia – EKVAM Colloquia Anatolica et Aegaea Congressus internationales Smyrnenses IX Archaeology and history of Lydia from the early Lydian period to late antiquity (8th century B.C.-6th century A.D.). An international symposium May 17-18, 2017 / Izmir, Turkey ABSTRACTS Edited by Ergün Laflı Gülseren Kan Şahin Last Update: 21/04/2017. Izmir, May 2017 Websites: https://independent.academia.edu/TheLydiaSymposium https://www.researchgate.net/profile/The_Lydia_Symposium 1 This symposium has been dedicated to Roberto Gusmani (1935-2009) and Peter Herrmann (1927-2002) due to their pioneering works on the archaeology and history of ancient Lydia. Fig. 1: Map of Lydia and neighbouring areas in western Asia Minor (S. Patacı, 2017). 2 Table of contents Ergün Laflı, An introduction to Lydian studies: Editorial remarks to the abstract booklet of the Lydia Symposium....................................................................................................................................................8-9. Nihal Akıllı, Protohistorical excavations at Hastane Höyük in Akhisar………………………………10. Sedat Akkurnaz, New examples of Archaic architectural terracottas from Lydia………………………..11. Gülseren Alkış Yazıcı, Some remarks on the ancient religions of Lydia……………………………….12. Elif Alten, Revolt of Achaeus against Antiochus III the Great and the siege of Sardis, based on classical textual, epigraphic and numismatic evidence………………………………………………………………....13. Gaetano Arena, Heleis: A chief doctor in Roman Lydia…….……………………………………....14. Ilias N. Arnaoutoglou, Κοινὸν, συμβίωσις: Associations in Hellenistic and Roman Lydia……….……..15. Eirini Artemi, The role of Ephesus in the late antiquity from the period of Diocletian to A.D. 449, the “Robber Synod”.……………………………………………………………………….………...16. Natalia S. Astashova, Anatolian pottery from Panticapaeum…………………………………….17-18. Ayşegül Aykurt, Minoan presence in western Anatolia……………………………………………...19.
    [Show full text]
  • The Online Journal of Communication and Media Volume 2 Issue 2 April 2016
    ISSN: xxxx-xxxx The Online Journal of Communication and Media Volume 2 Issue 2 April 2016 Editor-in-Chief Prof. Dr. Aytekin İşman Editors Prof. Dr. Aydın Ziya ÖZGÜR Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ergun YOLCU Associate Editor Assist. Prof. Dr. Seçil KAYA Technical Editor Hüseyin ESKİ Journal Secretary Mustafa ÖZTUNÇ www.tojcam.net 01.04.2016 The Online Journal of Communication and Media – April 2016 Volume 2, Issue 2 Copyright © 2015 - THE ONLINE JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA All rights reserved. No part of TOJCAM’s articles may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Contact Address: Prof. Dr. Aytekin İŞMAN TOJCAM, Editor in Chief Published in TURKEY Sakarya-Turkey www.tojcam.net Copyright © The Online Journal of Communication and Media The Online Journal of Communication and Media – April 2016 Volume 2, Issue 2 Message from the Editors Dear Colleagues, TOJCAM welcomes you. TOJCAM would like to thank you for your online journal interest. We are delighted that almost 15,000 academicians, teachers, and students from around the world have visited for two year. It means that TOJCAM has continued to diffuse new trends in communication and technology. We hope that the volume 2, issue 2 will also successfully accomplish our communication and technology. TOJCAM is confident that readers will learn and get different aspects on communication and technology. Any views expressed in this publication are the views of the authors and are not the views of the Editor and TOJCAM.
    [Show full text]
  • Kizilirmak Ilçe Analizi
    T.C. KUZEY ANADOLU KALKINMA AJANSI KIZILIRMAK İLÇE ANALİZİ HAZIRLAYAN AHMET GAZİ ZEYREK Planlama, Programlama ve Stratejik Araştırmalar Birimi Uzmanı Temmuz, 2013 ii Yönetici Özeti 2014 – 2023 Bölge Planına altlık teşkil edecek olan ilçe analizlerinin ilk örneği olan Tosya İlçe Analizi, Kuzey Anadolu Kalkınma Ajansı Planlama, Programlama ve Stratejik Araştırmalar Birimi tarafından 2012 yılında hazırlanmıştır. Kuzey Anadolu Kalkınma Ajansı’nın sorumluluk alanına giren TR82 Düzey 2 Bölgesi; Kastamonu, Çankırı ve Sinop illerinden müteşekkil olup, illerde sırasıyla (merkez ilçeler dâhil) 20, 12 ve 9 ilçe olmak üzere toplam 41 ilçe bulunmaktadır. Her bir ilçenin sosyal, ekonomik, kültürel ve mekânsal olarak incelendiği ilçe analizleri, mikro düzeyli raporlardır. Analizin ilk 5 bölümü ilçedeki mevcut durumu yansıtmaktadır. Mevcut durum analizinden sonra ilgili ilçede düzenlenen “İlçe Odak Grup Toplantıları”yla, ampirik bulgular ilçenin ileri gelen yöneticileri, iş adamları ve yerel inisiyatifleriyle tartışılarak analizin 6. Bölümünde bulunan ilçe stratejileri oluşturulmuştur. İlçe analizleri; İl Müdürlükleri, Kaymakamlıklar, Üniversiteler, Ticaret ve Sanayi Odaları, Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu ve Defterdarlıklardan alınan verilerle oluşturulduğundan, ilçeleri tanıtmanın yanında yatırımcılar için de aslında birer «Yatırım Ortamı Kılavuzu» olma özelliğini taşımaktadır. Çankırı’nın güney ilçelerinden birisi olan Kızılırmak’ın ekonomisi genel olarak tarım ve hayvancılığa dayanmaktadır. Kızılırmak nehrinin suladığı ilçede tarımsal alanlar çok geniş ve verimlidir. Çankırı il merkezine 54 km uzaklıkta bulunan ilçe, Çankırı, Ankara, Çorum ve Kırıkkale illerinin hinterlandında bulunmaktadır. Türkiye nüfusunun neredeyse 2,5 kat arttığı son 50 yılda, toplam nüfusu azalan ilçenin 2011 itibarıyla toplam nüfusu 8.189’dur ve bu nüfusun %26’sı kent nüfusudur. Çankırı’nın diğer ilçelerinde de olduğu gibi Kızılırmak’ın günümüzdeki en önemli problemlerinden birisi Bölge dışına göçtür.
    [Show full text]
  • Uşak İli Buğday (Triticum Aestivum L.) Ekim Alanlarında Sorun Olan Yabancı Ot Türlerinin, Yaygınlık Ve Yoğunluklarının Belirlenmesi¥
    Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 7(2): 349–367, 2020 https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.725793 TÜRK TURKISH TARIM ve DOĞA BİLİMLERİ JOURNAL of AGRICULTURAL DERGİSİ and NATURAL SCIENCES www.dergipark.gov.tr/turkjans Araştırma Makalesi Uşak İli Buğday (Triticum aestivum L.) Ekim Alanlarında Sorun Olan Yabancı Ot Türlerinin, Yaygınlık ve Yoğunluklarının Belirlenmesi¥ Derya KÖKTAŞ1, Derya ÖĞÜT YAVUZ2* 1Uşak Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Tarım Bilimleri, Uşak 2Uşak Üniversitesi, Ziraat ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi, Bitki Koruma, Uşak *Sorumlu yazar: [email protected] Geliş Tarihi: 27.08.2019 Düzeltme Geliş Tarihi: 08.12.2019 Kabul Tarihi: 04.02.2020 Özet Yabancı otlar % 48-52 oranlarında kayıpla diğer biyotik faktörlerden ön plana çıkmakta, rekabet ve salgıladığı allelopatik maddelerle buğdayda ürün kalitesinin düşmesine ve verim kaybına neden olmaktadır. Bu nedenle Uşak ili buğday alanlarında yürütülen bu çalışmada yabancı otların tür ve yoğunluklarının belirlenmesi, mücadele çalışmalarına kaynak oluşturması açısından önem arz etmektedir. Çalışma, Uşak ilini temsil edecek şekilde altı ilçede (Merkez, Banaz, Eşme, Karahallı, Ulubey ve Sivaslı) toplam 115 tarlada, mücadele yapılıp yapılmaması gözetilmeksizin buğday ekim alanları gezilerek yabancı otların tür, yaygınlık ve yoğunluklarının belirlenmesi amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Yapılan çalışma sonucunda Uşak ili buğday alanlarında 24 familyaya ait 11’i cins, 65’i tür ve tür altı takson düzeyinde toplam 76 takson tespit edilmiştir. İl bazında elde edilen sonuçlara göre yabancı
    [Show full text]