DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Reconnaissance Survey Significant Natural

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Reconnaissance Survey Significant Natural DRAFT RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY SIGNIFICANT NATURAL AREAS AND CULTURAL SITES ISLAND OF ROTA COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS September 2005 Prepared by the National Park Service Pacific West Region - Honolulu for the Legislature of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands The findings contained in this draft reconnaissance survey should not be construed as representing either the approval or the disapproval of the National Park Service or the Secretary of the Interior. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. 1 2.0. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 3 2.1. Background ......................................................................................................................... 3 2.2. National Park Service Special Resource Studies ................................................................ 4 2.2.1. Significance, Suitability and Feasibility Criteria.......................................................... 4 3.0. DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA .............................................................................. 6 3.1. Regional Context................................................................................................................. 6 3.2. Land Use on Rota................................................................................................................ 9 3.3. Covenant to Establish a Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands ...................... 12 3.4. Resource Type.................................................................................................................... 13 4.0. RESOURCE SIGNIFICANCE ............................................................................................. 15 4.1. Current Status of the Study Area ...................................................................................... 15 4.1.1. Habitat Conservation Plan .......................................................................................... 15 4.2. Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................ 16 4.2.1. Significant Prehistoric Sites........................................................................................ 18 4.2.2. Historic Sites............................................................................................................... 28 4.3 Natural Resources ............................................................................................................... 29 4.3.1. Native Forest............................................................................................................... 29 4.3.2. Threatened and Endangered Plants............................................................................. 32 4.3.3. Other Vegetation......................................................................................................... 34 4.3.4. Threatened and Endangered Wildlife ......................................................................... 36 4.3.5. Other Wildlife............................................................................................................. 40 4.3.6. Marine Resources. ...................................................................................................... 40 4.4. Evaluation of Significance ................................................................................................ 43 4.4.1. Cultural Resources...................................................................................................... 43 4.4.2. Natural Resources....................................................................................................... 44 5.0. PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF SUITABILITY AND FEASIBILITY ..................... 46 5.1. Rarity of Resources (Suitability)....................................................................................... 46 5.1.1. Natural History Themes.............................................................................................. 46 5.1.2. History and Prehistory Themes................................................................................... 47 5.1.3. Summary of Suitability............................................................................................... 48 5.2. Feasibility for Addition to the National Park System ....................................................... 48 6.0. ALTERNATIVES FOR RESOURCE PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT ................. 50 6.1. Alternative One. Establish a Unit of the National Park System ....................................... 50 6.1.1. Long-term Resource Protection................................................................................. 50 6.1.2. Effects on Existing Land Uses, Land Ownership and the Local Economy ................ 50 6.1.3. Quantity and Type of Visitor Use Opportunities........................................................ 50 6.1.4. General and Comparative Consideration of Cost ....................................................... 51 6.1.5. Potential for Resource Improvement .......................................................................... 51 6.2. Alternative Two. Establish a Commonwealth Park on Rota............................................. 51 6.2.1. Long-term Resource Protection.................................................................................. 51 6.2.2. Effects on Existing Land Uses, Land Ownership and the Local Economy ................ 51 6.2.3. Quantity and Type of Visitor Use Opportunities........................................................ 52 i 6.2.4. General and Comparative Consideration of Cost ....................................................... 52 6.2.5. Potential for Resource Improvement .......................................................................... 52 6.3. Alternative Three. Establish a National Wildlife Refuge.................................................. 52 6.3.1. Long-Term Resource Protection................................................................................. 52 6.3.2. Effects on Existing Land Uses, Land Ownership and the Local Economy ................ 53 6.3.3. Quantity and Type of Visitor Use Opportunities........................................................ 53 6.3.4. General and Comparative Consideration of Cost ....................................................... 53 6.3.5. Potential for Resource Improvement .......................................................................... 53 6.4. Alternative Four. Designation as National Landmarks..................................................... 53 6.4.1. Long-Term Resource Protection................................................................................. 54 6.4.2. Effects on Existing Land Uses, Land Ownership and the Local Economy ................ 54 6.4.3. Quantity and Type of Visitor Use Opportunities........................................................ 54 6.4.4. General and Comparative Consideration of Cost ....................................................... 55 6.4.5. Potential for Resource Improvement .......................................................................... 55 6.5. Alternative Five. Protection By Locally Designated Conservation Areas........................ 55 6.5.1. Long-Term Resource Protection................................................................................. 55 6.5.2. Effects on Existing Land Uses, Land Ownership and the Local Economy ................ 55 6.5.3. Quantity and Type of Visitor Use Opportunities........................................................ 56 6.5.4. General and Comparative Consideration of Cost ....................................................... 56 6.5.5. Potential for Resource Improvement .......................................................................... 56 7.0. FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................ 57 7.1. Position of CNMI and Rota Officials................................................................................ 57 7.2. Community Interest and Support ....................................................................................... 57 7.3. Large Natural Areas and Significant Cultural Sites.......................................................... 57 7.3.1. Mochon Latte Stone Village....................................................................................... 57 7.3.2. Taga Latte Stone Quarry............................................................................................. 57 7.3.3. Chugai Pictograph Cave ............................................................................................. 58 7.3.4. Alaguan Bay Ancient Village..................................................................................... 58 7.3.5. Native Limestone Forest............................................................................................. 59 7.3.6. Concepts for Resource Management and Visitor Use ................................................ 60 7.4. Reconnaissance Survey Findings...................................................................................... 62 8.0. SELECTED REFERENCES................................................................................................. 64 9.0. PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTERS...............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CNMI Workers' Compensation Program Was Created by the Enactment of Senate Bill 6-54 Into Public Law 6-33, the CNMI Workers' Compensation Law
    What You Need To Know About The CNMI Workers’ Compensation Program A Handbook For, Employers, Carriers and Employees Department of Commerce Workers’ Compensation Commission Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands About This Handbook This handbook is prepared to highlight some of the major provisions of the Workers' Compensation law, rules and regulations and to provide the users pertinent information and answers. Since this handbook provides only highlights which may not fully explain the law, it is strongly recommended that you read the law, coded under Title 4, Division 9, Chapter 3, of the Commonwealth Code. The handbook is divided into seven (7) major sections: 1) The Brief Information section which defines the purpose of the program. 2) Employer/Carrier section which covers essential information for the employer and carrier. 3) The Employee section provides the highlights regarding employee's right and responsibilities and the type of benefits. 4) The Claims procedure section discusses the how to obtain benefits for job related injury, illness or death. 5) The Adjudication section describes the settlement of disputes. 6) The Notices section describes the various forms used and deadlines. 7) Penalties section describes the penalties for violation of law. Employees are encouraged to discuss their responsibilities fully with supervisors to avoid the likelihood of missing deadlines and reports and consequently benefits. Remember, it is your responsibility to prove that your injury is work-related. For more information, please contact the Department of Commerce Workers' Compensation Office nearest you: Saipan: Tinian Rota Department of Commerce Department of Commerce Department of Commerce Workers’ Compensation Commission Workers’ Compensation Commission Workers’ Compensation Commission P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8. Land and Submerged Lands Use
    Guam and CNMI Military Relocation Draft EIS/OEIS (November 2009) CHAPTER 8. LAND AND SUBMERGED LANDS USE 8.1 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 8.1.1 Definition of Resource This chapter describes and analyzes impacts of the proposed action on land and submerged lands ownership and management, and land and submerged lands use. Submerged lands refer to coastal waters extending from the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) coastline into the ocean 3 nautical miles (nm) (5.6 kilometers [km]), the limit of state or territorial jurisdiction. Land use discussions for this Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/OEIS) include civilian and military existing and planned land uses, and land use planning guidance that directs future development. With respect to land ownership on Tinian, fee interest ownership is the primary means of private land ownership; leases or easements may also be used for land transfer or management purposes. On Tinian, the Department of Defense (DoD) leases approximately two-thirds of the total island area, exerting a notable influence upon Tinian land use. This chapter is organized to first look at existing conditions, then impacts are identified by alternatives and components. The chapter concludes with identification and discussion of potential mitigation measures that apply to significant impacts. The region of influence (ROI) for land use is land and submerged lands of Tinian. The proposed action is limited to Tinian; therefore, the emphasis is on Tinian with background information provided on CNMI. 8.1.2 Tinian Article XI and XII of the CNMI Constitution states that public lands collectively belong to the people of the Commonwealth who are of Northern Marianas decent.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This Form Is for Use in Nominating Or Requesting Determinations for Individual Properties and Districts
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: _Hotel Honokaa Club Other names/site number: Honokaa Club Hotel, Honokaa Club, TMK: (3) 4-5-006:013 Name of related multiple property listing: Historic and Architectural Resources of Honokaʻa Town, Hawaiʻi Island, Hawaiʻi (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing 2. Location Street & number: 45-3480 Māmane Street City or town: _Honokaʻa State: _HI County: _Hawaiʻi Not For Publication: Vicinity: 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: national _X statewide local Applicable National Register Criteria: _X A B _X C D Signature of certifying official/Title: Date State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Northern Mariana Islands Workforce Act of 2018, U.S. Public
    U.S. Department of the Interior Report to Congress Technical Assistance Northern Mariana Islands U.S. Workforce Act of 2018 October 2019 Department of the Interior TABLE OF CONTENTS Report of the Secretary of the Interior on Immigration in the CNMI 2 Office of Insular Affairs Authorities and Responsibilities to the Territories 2 Technical Assistance Program 3 Capital Improvement Project 3 Energizing Island Communities 4 Background and History of the CNMI Economy 5 Typhoon Yutu 7 Activities to Identify Opportunities for Economic Growth and Diversification 8 Office of Insular Affairs: Technical Assistance 8 Department of Commerce 11 International Trade Administration 11 Bureau of Economic Analysis 12 U.S. Census Bureau 12 Economic Development Administration 13 Office of Insular Affairs: Recruiting, Training, and Hiring U.S. Workers 14 Department of Labor 15 Background and Foreign Labor Certification 15 Implementation of Workforce Act 15 Commonwealth Worker Fund Annual Plan 16 Office of Insular Affairs: Technical Assistance 16 U.S. Department of Labor Formula and Discretionary Grants 17 Other Technical Assistance and Consultation 18 Section 902 Consultation of the Revocation of the PRC Tourist Parole Program 18 Recommendations by the Special Representatives 19 Conclusion 19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR ON RESPONSIBILITIES TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS In July 2018, President Trump signed into law H.R. 5956, the Northern Mariana Islands U.S. Workforce Act of 2018 (Act or the Workforce Act), Public Law 115-218.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Coastal Resilience Assessment
    COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS COASTAL RESILIENCE ASSESSMENT 20202020 Greg Dobson, Ian Johnson, Kim Rhodes UNC Asheville’s NEMAC Kristen Byler National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Bridget Lussier Lynker, on contract to NOAA Office for Coastal Management IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER: This report represents a Regional Coastal Resilience Assessment that can be used to identify places on the landscape for resilience-building efforts and conservation actions through understanding coastal flood threats, the exposure of populations and infrastructure have to those threats, and the presence of suitable fish and wildlife habitat. As with all remotely sensed or publicly available data, all features should be verified with a site visit, as the locations of suitable landscapes or areas containing flood threats and community assets are approximate. The data, maps, and analysis provided should be used only as a screening-level resource to support management decisions. This report should be used strictly as a planning reference tool and not for permitting or other legal purposes. The scientific results and conclusions, as well as any views or opinions expressed herein, are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government, or the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation’s partners. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government or the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation or its funding sources. NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION DISCLAIMER: The scientific results and conclusions, as well as any views or opinions expressed herein, are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of NOAA or the Department of Commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • View on KKMP This Morning
    Super Typhoon Yutu Relief & Recovery Update #4 POST-DECLARATION DAMAGE ASSESSMENT COMPLETED; RELIEF MANPOWER ON-ISLAND READY TO SUPPORT; FEEDER 1, PARTIAL 1 & 2 BACK ONLINE Release Date: October 29, 2018 On Sunday, October 28, 2018, CNMI Leadership and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) conducted a Post-Declaration Damage Assessment. Saipan, Tinian and Rota experienced very heavy rainfall and extremely high winds which caused damages to homes, businesses and critical infrastructure. Utility infrastructure on all three islands has been visibly severely impacted to include downed power lines, transformers and poles. Driving conditions remain hazardous as debris removal operations are still underway. At the request of Governor Ralph DLG. Torres, representatives from FEMA Individual Assistance (IA) and the US Small Business Administration (SBA) joined the CNMI on an Aerial Preliminary Damage Assessment of Saipan, Tinian and Rota. Findings are as follows: SAIPAN: 317 Major; 462 Destroyed (T=779) Villages covered: Kagman 1, 2 & 3 and LauLau, Susupe, Chalan Kanoa, San Antonio, Koblerville, Dandan and San Vicente Power outage across the island 2-mile-long gas lines observed Extensive damage to critical infrastructure in southern Saipan Downed power poles and lines Page 1 of 8 Page printed at fema.gov/ja/press-release/20201016/super-typhoon-yutu-relief-recovery-update-4-post-declaration- 09/28/2021 damage TINIAN: 113 Major; 70 Destroyed (T=183) Villages covered: San Jose & House of Taga, Carolinas, Marpo Valley and Marpo Heights Power outage across the island; estimated to take 3 months to achieve 50% restoration Tinian Health Center sustained extensive damage Observed a downed communications tower ROTA: 38 Major; 13 Destroyed (T=51) Villages covered: Songsong Village and Sinapalo Power outage across the island Sustained the least amount of damage as compared to Saipan and Tinian Red Cross CNMI-wide assessments begin Tuesday, October 30, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas
    Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas Neal L. Evenhuis, Lucius G. Eldredge, Keith T. Arakaki, Darcy Oishi, Janis N. Garcia & William P. Haines Pacific Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817 Final Report November 2010 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Fish & Wildlife Office Honolulu, Hawaii Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 2 BISHOP MUSEUM The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai’i 96817–2704, USA Copyright© 2010 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America Contribution No. 2010-015 to the Pacific Biological Survey Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 5 Background ..................................................................................................................... 7 General History .............................................................................................................. 10 Previous Expeditions to Pagan Surveying Terrestrial Arthropods ................................ 12 Current Survey and List of Collecting Sites .................................................................. 18 Sampling Methods ......................................................................................................... 25 Survey Results ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • W Abol Sued for Breach of Contract CDA Opposes Loan Condonation 10
    Micronesia’s Leading Newspaper Since 1972 Voi 21 No 2 0 \ p p i p | i l i l Saipan, MP 96950 s4©1993 ^ananas Serving CNMI for 20 Years W a b o l s u e d ' W l k f o r b r e a c h ■ ft: of contract I f ; l № . * TRANSAMERICACorp., which the court to order Wabol to accept was recently evicted from a piece the payment. of land along Beach Road, has The company said Wabol com­ filed a lawsuit against land owner mitted breach of contract by ver­ Concepcion S. Wabol for breach bal and written threats, refusal to of contract. accept the full payment for the Transamerica claimed it had the leases and by asking the Superior ' V I r..y,.y«ÊtL a “ 'Toy-- T -I right to continue occupying the Court to authorize her to possess two adjoining lots based on 55 the property where Transamerica SOME 600 Japanese students from first through sixth grade visited La Fiesta San Roque Shopping Center year leases signed by the com­ operates a construction supplies last week. The group came to Saipan as part of an educational cruise arranged by Pacific Micronesia Tour. pany and Wabol in August 1991. store. It is also the location of In its complaint filed on April Transamerica’s offices/ware­ 1, the company asked the Supe­ house and housing facility for 40 rior Court to declare the new leases workers. CDA opposes loan condonation as valid. Transamerica has occupied the COMMONWEALTH Develop­ rectors Ray Guerrero and John 52 low-cost housing units at the According to the su it, Wabol property for several years and has ment Authority (CDA) has op­ M.
    [Show full text]
  • Tech Memo Cultural Resources
    CJMT EIS/OEIS Appendix N April 2015 Draft Cultural Resources APPENDIX N CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL MEMO Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 CULTURAL RESOURCES REGULATIONS, STANDARDS, AND GUIDELINES .....................................................1 2.0 CULTURAL RESOURCES AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT .................................................................. 2 2.1 TINIAN ....................................................................................................................................3 2.1.1 Historical Overview ............................................................................................................. 3 2.1.2 Previous Studies and Recorded Cultural Resources ........................................................... 7 2.2 PAGAN .................................................................................................................................. 13 2.2.1 Historical Overview ........................................................................................................... 13 2.2.2 Previous Studies and Recorded Cultural Resources ......................................................... 16 3.0 CULTURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ................................................... 19 3.1 METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................... 20 3.1.1 Approach to Analysis .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Manchester Dale Book
    \ - - 1-( rRiDAT,JDM I|il PAGE FOURTEEN Manchester^ Evening Herald To^Help Y6 u ;^ eep m e ' l i e / u s i ■■ X C a su a ltie s Briefing Before Fight for Saipan Ridge British Stand Firm *inafores o n o a ip a n ; w Select* a ^ p le of these d^v Wl.T . ii^htfuljy coolxSummer dresses X that win make I^e more enjoy­ Resistance Stiff able on humid days. Striped Ihop Saturday for 3 Days...Sfore Closed crepes, also blue ano\Ted crepes Tank& and prints. Sizes up vbx40. 9,752 Dead, Wounded J ) r o n Monday, July 3 and Tuesday, July 4. ■f. And Mis$ing /1n First . ■* •• Two Week^; Defend- y^oft War ' Bombers Hit France May 30 More Panzers R^;]; 0p<^ All Day Wednesday, July 5 / $ 1 .9 8 to $ . ^ m FijtntingFigkting WiU^ tluced to ■ ShatterU^': 4 mcreaiiM Tenacity; On Saipan Rail Centers Become Full Hulks o f Steel; Ame^N New^ains in Center. leans ill Central See»j tor Drive to Wilhil8;i Buy Your Canned Goods Abandon Old Tactics of And Oil Plant Nazi Puppet S. Pacific Fleet Head- Two and One - Hallj' HALE'S Withdrawing from Today! Many Are Going .iarters, Pearl Harbor, July 3Iiles of St. Lo; Rom*^ T.—(/p) ,— American forces Island Bases With Americans Smash at Germans May Wipe SELF SERVE Back On Points Agc^iii Dressmaker mel Seen in Command ubch^ through intensified Only Minor Defense. ‘Five Nazi Air Fields Out Last Pretense The Original In New EngUnd! Sapanese resistance today on K .
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Governor Ralph
    142°0'E 143°0'E 144°0'E 145°0'E 146°0'E 147°0'E 148°0'E 149°0'E 115th Congress of the United States Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands 21°0'N Governor Ralph Deleon Guerrero Torres 21°0'N Uracus (Farallon de Pajaros) Maug 20°0'N 20°0'N Philippine Sea Asuncion Pacific Ocean NORTHERN ISLANDS (parts) SAIPAN 19°0'N 19°0'N Northern Agrihan Tinian Philippine Sea DISTRICT 4 Western (parts) Tinian Eastern Tinian 15°0'N DISTRICT 6 (part) (Marpo Valley) Pagan Marpo San Jose Heights (Tinian 18°0'N Municipality) 18°0'N Carolinas TINIAN Heights Sabaneta Carolinas Banaderu Pidos Kahalo Alamagan Philippine Marpi I Maddok Sea Matansa Fanonchuluyan Bird As Pacific Matuis Island Guguan San Ocean Achugao Roque Managaha Tangke g pa Kalabera a og DISTRICT 3 an et Nanasu T ah (part) M Puerto Rico s A As Akina As Palacios Lower Sadog Base Tasi DISTRICT 4 Navy Hill American (part) 17°0'N Memorial 17°0'N Park As Talafofo Aguijan Rabagau Capitol Hill DISTRICT 6 n a Chalan (part) p F a a Galaide r na a ng SAIPAN an G I Denni Sarigan an I Scale: 1:130,000 o a Pitot 0 3 Kilometers h As Teo China Maturana c I Town o Hill p Akgak 0 3 Miles a T g Gualo n a As Falipe y Rai i L Hilaihai I DISTRICT 3 Kagman I (part) Chacha u a Papago l u a Kagman Kagman IV L DISTRICT 5 Anatahan n II a l Chalan Kagman a San Jose h Rueda C (Oleai) Laulau Chalan Bay Kiya Kannat Kagman Tabla III As Chalan Susupe Terlaje Kanoa II Forbidden Chalan Finasisu San Island Farallon de Medinilla Philippine Kanoa III Chalan Vicente Pekngasu Kanoa I 16°0'N Mochong Chalan 16°0'N Sea Agusan Kanoa
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 XTERRA Saipan Press Guide.Qxd
    AND THE SAIPAN SPORTS FEST MARCH 31 - APRIL 9 2006 PRESS GUIDE ssppoonnssoorrss The 2006 XTERRA Saipan Championship is presented by the Marianas Visitors Authority, and sponsored by the Pacific Islands Club, Paul Mitchell, XTERRA Gear, and Coca~Cola Beverage Co. (Micronesia), Inc. iinnttoo tthhee jjuunnggllee . AT THE 5th ANNUAL XTERRA SAIPAN CHAMPIONSHIP XTERRA is the world’s premier off-road multisport event. An extreme competition, the XTERRA format combines swimming with mountain biking and trail running. It has been described as one part triathlon, one part mountain bike race, and one part “survival of the fittest”. With its white sand beaches, warm water, jungle trails, and secret caves it’s easy to see how the XTERRA Saipan Championship became the “crown jewel” of the XTERRA Global Tour. In 2006 there will be more than 100 XTERRA races in 17 countries…but none quite like this one! The race starts with a 1.5-kilometer swim in the crystal clear waters fronting Micro Beach, follows with a 30k mountain bike ride that traverses island terrain to the top of Mount Tapotchau (the highest point on the island at 1,545 feet elevation) and finishes with a 12k trail run that takes competitors past World War II relics and through secret jungles and caves. The event is a qualifier for the 2006 Nissan Xterra World Championship held in Maui on October 29 - with 34 slots available to the top finishers in each age group (see page 12 for details). The race will also award points to amateur athletes racing in this year’s Nissan Xterra USA Championship Series.
    [Show full text]