DOCSLIB.ORG

10. Cultural Heritage

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Beauly-Dounreay Chapter 10: Cultural Heritage 275kV Overhead Transmission Line: Second Circuit Environmental Statement 10. Cultural Heritage 10.1. Introduction 10.1.1 This report considers the likely effects on cultural heritage interest of the proposed works associated with the Beauly to Dounreay 275kV overhead transmission line. 10.1.2 The study has been undertaken by CFA Archaeology Ltd (CFA). 10.1.3 The objectives of the archaeology and cultural heritage study were to: • identify the cultural heritage baseline along and in the vicinity of the existing overhead transmission line, proposed access routes and other construction locations, and existing 11kV and 33kV wood pole lines where they cross the 275kV line and would be undergrounded; • assess the potential development areas in terms of their archaeological and historic environment potential; • consider the effects of the construction and operation of the proposed development features on the baseline cultural heritage resource; • identify measures, where appropriate, to mitigate any predicted adverse effects. 10.1.4 Those sites relevant to this proposed development are archaeological features, Listed Buildings, Scheduled Ancient Monuments (SAMs), and Historic Gardens and Designed Landscapes. There are no World Heritage sites or Conservation Areas within the area covered by this study and these designations are therefore not considered further in the chapter. 10.1.5 Figure 10.1 (sheets 1 – 22) depict the existing 275kV line route and the proposed routes of construction accesses, together with the locations of the cultural heritage sites and monuments identified by the study within the study corridors. 10.2. Potential Impacts 10.2.1 A description of the project is presented in Chapter 3. Potential impacts on cultural heritage resources may include the following: • ground-disturbing activities required for the excavation of cable trenches for the undergrounding of sections of existing 11kV/33kV lines, that may damage, and possibly obliterate, cultural heritage remains; • ground-disturbing activities required for upgrading access tracks or laying temporary ‘trakway’ tracks, that may damage cultural heritage remains; • above-ground disturbance, such as that caused by vehicle movement and placing of pulling machines, that may produce irreversible impacts upon archaeological remains; • above-ground changes that may cause indirect (e.g. visual) impacts upon the setting of cultural heritage sites. 1 Beauly-Dounreay Chapter 10: Cultural Heritage 275kV Overhead Transmission Line: Second Circuit Environmental Statement 10.2.2 Direct impacts of the types indicated in the first two points are most likely to occur during construction. Indirect impacts relating to the setting of cultural heritage sites and monuments would occur from the outset of construction and continue throughout the operational life of the proposed line. 10.2.3 The Scoping Report (April 2006) stated that as the proposed works involve only slight changes to the existing overhead line, there would be no perceptible change to the setting of cultural heritage features and it was considered that there would be no requirement to address this aspect as part of this Environmental Statement (ES) (see also Chapter 5 Landscape Character, and Chapter 6 Visual Amenity) 10.3. Scoping and Consultation 10.3.1 Wardell Armstrong on behalf of SHETL published a Scoping Report in April 2006, at a time when a greater scope of works was envisaged than is now proposed (see Chapter 2). Following receipt of comments back from the then Scottish Executive and consultees, during the spring/summer of 2006 the ongoing engineering studies of the line resulted in technical solutions being designed such that none of the towers need to be heightened. The potential for environmental impacts during construction and operation is therefore considerably reduced by comparison with the scenario considered in the Scoping Study. 10.3.2 The then Scottish Executive responded to the scoping opinion and recommended that, as regards cultural heritage, there should be an ‘audit of affected sites’. This is taken to imply that a gazetteer of all designated and non-designated sites along the route of the existing overhead transmission line and proposed access routes was required. 10.3.3 Historic Scotland provided a detailed response to the Scoping enquiry (1st June 2006) in which it set out its principles for assessing the impacts of the development on the cultural heritage resource. Historic Scotland noted that one SAM, Achinnearin, souterrain and enclosure South of Suisgill Lodge (SAM 1826), lies directly beneath the existing overhead transmission line and in close proximity to a tower. Historic Scotland requested that the potential direct impacts of both short and long term access to the tower and transmission line be considered, with the possibility of moving the pylon further from the monument considered as mitigation. The tower is excluded from the scheduled area. Historic Scotland noted also that several SAMs, a category B Listed building and 4 Historic gardens and Designed Landscapes lie in ‘close proximity’ to the overhead transmission line and in positions where access may impose direct impacts upon these features: Leathad Carnaich, hut circles, clearance cairns (SAM 1876) The Borg, broch (SAM 1839) Kinbrace Station, settlement and field system (SAM 1874) Kinbrace Farm, cairn, burnt mound, hut circle and field system (1796) Blaimore, hut circles and field system (SAM 1838) East Kinnauld, fort (SAM 1861) Brae Cottage, two hut circles (SAM 1830) 2 Beauly-Dounreay Chapter 10: Cultural Heritage 275kV Overhead Transmission Line: Second Circuit Environmental Statement Easter Baldoon, chambered cairn (SAM 4753) Dun More, fort (SAM 3107) Invercharron House, Gate and Piers Category B Listed (7174) Ardross Castle Historic Garden and Designed Landscape Kildonan Lodge Historic Garden and Designed Landscape Novar House Historic Garden and Designed Landscape Brahan Historic Garden and Designed Landscape 10.3.4 Historic Scotland noted that the Cultural Heritage section of the Scoping Report considered that assessment of effects on setting was considered unnecessary for the project. Historic Scotland agreed that the settings of cultural heritage features along the route of the line are not likely to be significantly altered by this proposal. They however recommended that effects on setting should still be considered, particularly in relation to alterations in the policies of the Historic Gardens and Designed Landscapes listed above and the listed buildings within their estates. 10.3.5 The Highland Council (THC) provided a detailed response to the Scoping Enquiry (7th June 2006) in which it set out its recommended approach to assessing the impacts of the development on the cultural heritage resources including: identification of the cultural heritage baseline within the proposal area; assessing the proposed development site in terms of its archaeological and historic environment potential; considering the potential impacts of construction and operation of the proposed development on the cultural heritage resource; and proposing measures (where appropriate) to mitigate any predicted adverse impacts 10.3.6 In response to THC scoping opinion CFA Archaeology provided THC with a Draft Methods Statement, for baseline study and impact assessment, for their approval. The Draft Methods Statement varied from the methodology stated in the Scoping Response in two areas: In relation to the field survey of access routes (section 5.3.15 of Scoping Response), CFA Archaeology proposed a different approach to surveying access routes. Where construction works would use existing tracks, site visits would be made to identified archaeological sites present within 20m of them, in order that requirement for avoidance and protection mitigation could be assessed. CFA Archaeology proposed to use their in-house impact assessment methodology outlined in sections 11-15 of the Draft Methods Statement rather than that described in sections 5.3.19-25 of the Scoping Response. 10.3.7 THC provided a response (2 Oct 2006) approving the Draft Method Statement provided by CFA Archaeology. The response also outlined THC’s recommended approach to the 3 Beauly-Dounreay Chapter 10: Cultural Heritage 275kV Overhead Transmission Line: Second Circuit Environmental Statement EIA and provided a list of sources of information that they recommended should be consulted. 10.4. Statutory and Planning Context 10.4.1 Introduction 10.4.1.1. The following sections provide information on the statutory and planning policy framework designed to protect cultural heritage resources (see also Chapter 12). 10.4.1.2. Historic Scotland’s Scottish Historic Environment Policy 1 – Scotland’s Historic Environment (2007) sets out the Scottish Ministers’ vision and policies for the historic environment. It states that the protection of the historic environment is not about preventing change. Ministers believe that change in this dynamic environment should be managed intelligently and with understanding, to achieve the best outcome for the historic environment and for the people of Scotland. 10.4.1.3. The three key outcomes of this policy are to ensure that: 1. the historic environment is cared for, protected and enhanced for the benefit of our own and future generations; 2. there is increased public appreciation and enjoyment of the historic environment amongst all the people of Scotland and visitors to the country; and,
Recommended publications
  • Sutherland Futures-P22-24

    Sutherland Futures-P22-24

    THINGS YOU NEED TO NOTE ALTNAHARRA, OUTLYING TOWNSHIPS INCHNADAMPH, FORSINARD Reinforcing rural townships where development is consistent with the pattern of AND KINBRACE settlement, service capacity and local amenity is encouraged. Central South and East North West Achnahannat Achuan Achlyness Several traditional staging posts within the remote and sparsely populated Achnairn Achavandra Muir Achmelvich interior continue to offer lifeline services in remote, fragile communities. Altass Achrimsdale-East Achnacarin Prospects are dependent on sustained employment in estate/land management, Amat Clyne Achriesgill (east and tourism and interpretive facilities and local enterprise. Development pressures Astle Achue west) are negligible. Given a lack of first-time infrastructure, a flexible development Linside Ardachu Badcall regime needs to balance safeguards for the existing character and environmental Linsidemore Backies Badnaban standards. Migdale Badnellan Balchladich Spinningdale Badninish Blairmore Camore Clachtoll Clashbuidh Clashmore What key sites are most suitable? What key sites North are least suitable? Does the Settlement Clashmore Clashnessie Achininver Crakaig Crofts- Culkein Development Area suitably reflect the limits of Baligill Lothmore Culkein of Drumbeg ?? your community for future development? Blandy/Strathtongue ??? Crofthaugh Droman Braetongue/ Brae Culgower-West Garty Elphin What development or facilities does your Kirkiboll Lodge Foindle Clerkhill community need and where? Culrain Inshegra Coldbackie Dalchalm Inverkirkaig
  • Sutherland Local Plan: Housing Feedback Comments

    Sutherland Local Plan: Housing Feedback Comments

    SUTHERLAND LOCAL PLAN: HOUSING FEEDBACK COMMENTS Housing For example: In light of the likely need for housing in your community are there any particular sites you would like to see developed? Do you have a view on the level of need and type of affordable housing required? Can crofting land contribute to meeting the demand for housing? General • There is plenty of land for development locally if permission was to be GIVEN! • Yes, you need to see to it that land is made available for house building and small farming. The rest would follow by natural investment and economic development. • Much of the new housing is haphazard; spoiling the beautiful rural areas of the country. Unattractive modern boxes. Need for housing for key workers, perhaps subsidised and only allowed to be sold to other key workers, not above the rate of inflation, definitely not to the retired or as second homes. • I cannot understand why permission is granted to build new houses when so many houses ripe for renovation are allowed to deteriorate until they are beyond redemption. • Develop only where there is public waste drainage. It is environmentally unsound to build more and more new houses in crofting areas. Invest in environmentally friendly septic tank solution i.e. enforce the creation of reed beds etc. to clear waste. • New house building to be allowed after planning consent for main house to automatically be allowed to expand for future children i.e. new wing or zone, larger housing in ground. Owners then do not have to have children move away and still allow for offspring independence with open market (see natural and cultural heritage.) • No – business brings work.
  • Kinbrace Drove Stance Summary

    Kinbrace Drove Stance Summary

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON MHG10266 Name: Kinbrace Drove Stance Summary: A two-compartment enclosure probably constructed as a drove stance. Grid Reference: NC866286 Civil Parish: Kildonan Geographical Area: Sutherland Date of Survey: 26 January 2012 Monument Type: Stock enclosure Full Description: The stance is situated on a grassy haugh on the east bank of the River Helmsdale and consists of a rectangular enclosure with two compartments. The earthen dykes are up to one metre in height but are poorly preserved and discontinuous in places. In the south dyke there is a probable entrance near the south east corner and a second gap further to the west. A mound ten metres north of the enclosure is suggestive of a small building but might be a natural feature. It is likely that two drove roads from the north converged at or near to this location – the Ca na Catanach (MHG 835) from Caithness and the route from Syre in Strathnaver – while the drove road south from this point enters the hill ground near Borrobol and continues to Invershin. The stance lies 3.5 km south of the site of the former drovers’ inn at Achentoul. It is possible that the stance passed out of use when this inn (which is likely to have had its own stance) came into operation, or it may have been used as an alternative site for assembling droves and holding them overnight. The monument is currently recorded as a Stock Enclosure but its configuration and location indicates that it was probably a drove stance. Other References: Rev Donald Sage, in ‘Parish Life in the North of Scotland’, wrote: About three miles below, the river receives a considerable addition to its volume by the water of Strathbeag which, rising about eight miles to the N.E., there joins the Helmisdale.
  • The Highland Council 4.4 Caithness, Sutherland

    The Highland Council 4.4 Caithness, Sutherland

    THE HIGHLAND COUNCIL Agenda Item 4.4 CAITHNESS, SUTHERLAND & EASTER ROSS PLANNING Report No APPLICATIONS AND REVIEW COMMITTEE – 21 April 2009 18/09 08/00432/FULSU Erection of house and garage, installation of new septic tank and soakaway system and formation of new access onto public road at land 250 metres north of Bighouse, Trantlemore, Forsinard. Report by Area Planning and Building Standards Manager SUMMARY This application seeks detailed consent for the erection of a house and garage, installation of a new septic tank and soakaway system, and formation of a new access onto the public road on land 250 metres north of Bighouse, Trantlemore, Forsinard. The application is reported to Committee because it is considered to be unacceptable on design grounds. The Recommendation is to REFUSE planning permission. Ward Number 1 – North West and Central Sutherland Applicant – Mr Morrison 1. PROPOSAL 1.1 The application site lies on the eastern side of the public road from Trantlemore to Upper Bighouse, which runs parallel to the A897. The site is currently rough grazing with open views towards Halladale River. There is a former croft house on the site which is to be demolished. The site slopes down from the road and then levels off before a short and sharp drop in levels to the field below. 1.2 The application seeks detailed consent for the erection of a two storey house measuring 9.135 metres in length, 7.620 metres in depth at the north west gable and 9.020 metres in depth at the south east gable. There is a two storey pitched roof projection on the front elevation with a bay window protruding from this.
  • Northern Scotland

    Northern Scotland

    Soil Survey of Scotland NORTHERN SCOTLAND 15250 000 SHEET 3 The Macaulay Institute for Soil Research Aberdeen 1982 SOIL SURVEY OF SCOTLAND Soil and Land Capability for Agriculture NORTHERN SCOTLAND By D. W. Futty, BSc and W. Towers, BSc with contributions by R. E. F. Heslop, BSc, A. D. Walker, BSc, J. S. Robertson, BSc, C. G. B. Campbell, BSc, G. G. Wright, BSc and J. H. Gauld, BSc, PhD The Macaulay Institute for Soil Research Aberdeen 1982 @ The Macaulay Institute for Soil Research, Aberdeen, 1982 Front cover. CanGP, Suiluen and Cu1 Mor from north of Lochinuer, Sutherland. Hills of Tomdonian sandsione rise above a strongly undulating plateau of Lewirian gneiss. Institute of Geologcal Sciences photograph published by permission of the Director; NERC copyight. ISBN 0 7084 0221 6 PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS ABERDEEN Contents Chapter Page PREFACE vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ix 1 DE~CRIPTIONOF THE AREA 1 PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS- GEOLOGY, LANDFORMS AND PARENT MATERIALS 1 The Northern Highlands 1 The Grampian Highlands 5 The Caithness Plain 6 The Moray Firth Lowlands 7 CLIMATE 7 Rainfall and potential water deficit 8 Accumulated temperature 9 Exposure 9 SOILS 10 General aspects 10 Classification and distribution 12 VEGETATION 15 Moorland 16 Oroarctic communities 17 Grassland 18 Foreshore and dunes 19 Saltings and splash zone 19 Scrub and woodland 19 2 THE SOIL MAP UNITS 21 The Alluvial Soils 21 The Organic Soils 28 The Aberlour Association 31 The Ardvanie Association 32 The Arkaig Association 33 The Berriedale Association 44 The
  • The Nuclear and Caithness Archive 1 P693 Hamilton's Auction Marts, Thurso, Lybster and Forsinard RECORDS' IDENTITY

    The Nuclear and Caithness Archive 1 P693 Hamilton's Auction Marts, Thurso, Lybster and Forsinard RECORDS' IDENTITY

    P693 Hamilton’s Auction Marts, Thurso, Lybster and Forsinard RECORDS’ IDENTITY STATEMENT Reference number: P693 Alternative reference number: Title: Hamilton’s Auction Marts, Thurso, Lybster and Forsinard Dates of creation: 1923-2006 Level of description: Fonds Extent: 5.5 shelves Format: paper RECORDS’ CONTEXT Name of creators: Hamilton’s Auction Marts, Hamilton’s and UA Partnership Ltd Administrative history: Hamilton’s Auction Marts were situated in Ormlie Road, Thurso, and opened for business on 28 March 1923. They also had premises in Lybster and Forsinard. It continued business as a livestock auctioneering company until c.1995 when it became Hamilton’s & UA Partnership Ltd Custodial history: RECORDS’ CONTENT Description: Business ledgers, Cash books and Sales books , Catalogues, Appraisal: Accruals: Acc. 817, Acc. 1301(formerly Acc. 1211), Acc. 1302 (formerly Acc. 1202),Acc.1303, Acc. 1307 RECORDS’ CONDITION OF ACCESS AND USE Access: Open Closed until: Nucleus: The Nuclear and Caithness Archive 1 Access conditions: Available in the Archive searchroom Copying: Copying permitted within the standard Copyright Act parameters Finding aids: Available in Archive searchroom ALLIED MATERIALS Related material: Publication: Notes: Date of catalogue: April 2014 Ref. Description Dates P693/1 Business Ledgers P693/1/1 Business Ledger, Thurso No. 2 [1 volume] 31 Jul 1928 - 31 Jul 1929 P693/1/2 Business Ledger, Thurso No. 3 [1 volume] 31 Jul 1929 - 31 Jul 1930 P693/1/3 Business Ledger, Thurso No.4 [1 volume] 01 Aug 1930 - 31 Jul 1931 P693/1/4 Business Ledger, Thurso No. 5 [1 volume] 01 Aug 1931 - 31 Jul 1932 P693/1/5 Business Ledger, Thurso No.
  • 6.7 Applicant: SSE Generation Limited (20/03481/S36) (PLN/044/21)

    6.7 Applicant: SSE Generation Limited (20/03481/S36) (PLN/044/21)

    Agenda 6.7 Item Report PLN/044/21 No HIGHLAND COUNCIL Committee: North Planning Applications Committee Date: 8 June 2021 Report Title: 20/03481/S36 : SSE Generation Limited Land at Strathy South, Strathy Forest, Strathy Report By: Acting Head of Development Management Purpose/Executive Summary Description: Strathy South Wind Farm - Application under Section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989 to vary the consented Strathy South Wind Farm to increase the blade tip height from 135 m to up to 200 m and increase maximum consented output from 133 MW to 208 MW Ward: 01 – North, West and Central Sutherland Development category: Major (Electricity Act Consultation) Reason referred to Committee: Major Electricity Act Consultation All relevant matters have been taken into account when appraising this application. It is considered that the proposal accords with the principles and policies contained within the Development Plan and is acceptable in terms of all other applicable material considerations. Recommendation Members are asked to agree the recommendation to RAISE NO OBJECTION to the application subject to conditions and mitigation as set out in section 11 of the report 1. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1.1 The Highland Council has been consulted by the Scottish Government’s Energy Consents Unit (ECU) on an application made under Section 36C of the Electricity Act 1989 (as amended) for an increase in blade tip height of the consented, but not yet built, Strathy South Wind Farm as well as an increase in consented output from 133MW to 208MW. The consented blade tip height is 135m, the new proposed blade tip height is 200m.
  • Facts and Figures 1997-98

    Facts and Figures 1997-98

    FACTS AND FIGURES 1997-98 Scottish Natural Heritage is a government body established by Parliament in 1992, responsible to The Secretary of State for Scotland. Our task is to secure the Working conservation and enhancement of Scotland’s unique and precious with natural heritage – the wildlife, the habitats and the landscapes which Scotland’s have evolved in Scotland through long partnership between people people to and nature. care for We advise on policies and promote Scottish Natural Heritage practical projects which aim to Publications Section our natural improve the natural heritage and Battleby support its sustainable use. Redgorton Perth PH1 3EW heritage Tel: 01738 627921 Fax: 01738 827411 Our aim is to help people to enjoy E-mail: [email protected] Scotland’s natural heritage Web site: http://www.snh.org.uk responsibly, understand it more ISBN: 1 85397 016 6 fully and use it wisely, so that it can TH1.5K1198 be sustained for future generations. Printed by J. Thomson Colour Printers PREFACE SNH Facts and Figures 1997/98 contains a range of useful facts and statistics about SNH’s work and is a companion publication to our Annual Report. SNH came into being on 1 April 1992, and in our first Annual Report we published an inventory of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs). This inventory was updated in SNH Facts and Figures 1996/97. We have also provided a complete Scottish listing of National Nature Reserves, National Scenic Areas, European sites and certain other types of designation. As well as the information on sites, we have also published information on our successes during 1997/98 including partnership funding of projects, details of grants awarded, licences issued and our performance in meeting our standards for customer care.
  • The Highland Council Sutherland Local Plan Deposit Draft November

    The Highland Council Sutherland Local Plan Deposit Draft November

    The Highland Council Sutherland Local Plan Deposit Draft November 2008 Statement of Publicity and Consultation Leading to the Deposit Draft Local Plan As required to comply with Section 12(5) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 1 Introduction This report is required under Section 12(5) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 and Regulation 30(2) of the Town and Country Planning (Structure and Local Plans) (Scotland) Regulations 1983. It summarises the procedures that the Council as a Planning Authority has carried out in order to secure the necessary degree of public participation in the preparation of this Local Plan. Contents Page Section 1 Timetable of events (and supporting information / examples) 3 – 9 Section 2 Supporting information / examples 10 - 207 Section 3 Note of consultation list 208 Section 4 Diagram of Plan Stages 209 2 Section 1: Timetable of events The following table sets out the activities undertaken by the Local Plan Team to raise awareness of the Local Plan and determine the views of the general public and other stakeholders. Supporting information (including examples) is available in Section 2 following the table, on the pages as indicated in the right hand column. A diagram of Plan Stages is provided in Section 4. June 2005 The Sutherland Local Housing Development Informal phase of Forum is attended by those with an interest work in affordable housing provision. A representative of the Local Plan team attended these meetings bi monthly and the Local Plan was accepted as a standing item on the agenda and considered at each subsequent meeting.
  • FINAL$REPORT$ ! May$2016$ !

    FINAL$REPORT$ ! May$2016$ !

    ! ! B"""R"""A"""N"""C"""H"""L"""I"""N"""E"""R" How$do$we$solve$$ a$problem$like$the$Flows?$ FINAL$REPORT$ ! May$2016$ ! Co+funded$by:$ Strategic$Timber$Transport$Fund$ Forestry$Commission$Scotland$ HITRANS$ ! Page|! 1! HITRANS – BRANCHLINER 1 : FINAL REPORT Contents' ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Page!No! Section'I' Introduction'&'Background,'Summary'of'Conclusions'&'Next'Steps' ''3' Section'2' Work'Programme'1'A'Civil'Engineering'&'Signalling' ' ' ''9' Section'3' Work'Programme'2'A'Rail'Operations'' ' ' ' ' 14' Section'4' Work'Programme'3'A'Road'Logistics'' ' ' ' ' ' 28' Section'5' Work'Progammes'4'&'5'A'Timber'Supply'&'Facilitation' ' ' 35' Section'6' Work'Programme'6'A'Economic'Impact'Analysis' ' ' ' 42' Section'7' Work'Programme'7'A'Environmental'Impact' ' ' ' 49' ' APPENDIX'I' ' I'Project'Outline'&'Work'Programme'(WP)'Briefs' ' ' ' ' 57' May 2016! Page|! 2! HITRANS – BRANCHLINER 1 : FINAL REPORT May 2016 ! ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 1.1.1.1 ' ' ' ' !! !!!!!SECTION! ' ' ' ' ' ' 1' Introduction' &'Background,'' Summary'of' Conclusions'' &'' Next'Steps'' May 2016! Page|! 3! HITRANS – BRANCHLINER 1 : FINAL REPORT Introduction'&'Background'' ' THE!BRANCHLINER!project!started!out!in!September! Given!the!high!cost!of!the!demonstrator,!STTS!was! 2014!as!an!outcome!of!the!Highland!Timber! awarded!for!the!study!project!element!only,! Transport!Group!Flow!Country!Strategy!and!followed! following!resubmission!in!December!2014.!!! on!from!two!earlier!HITRANS!reports:!Upsticks!M! modelling!timber!flows!to!the!main!mills!in!the!Inner! HITRANS!with!support!from!Confor,!UK!Forest!

  • Lighting Assessment

    Strathy South Wind Farm 2020 Technical Appendices Section 36C Application - EIAR TA 4 – Landscape and Visual Amenity TA 4.10: Lighting Assessment SSE Generation Limited August 2020 Strathy South Wind Farm 2020 Technical Appendix 4.10 Strathy South Wind Farm 2020 Technical Appendix 4.10 Section 36C Application - EIAR Lighting Assessment Section 36C Application - EIAR Lighting Assessment x Each of the 39 turbines would have a 32 candela red light fitted to the tower at half the height TECHNICAL APPENDIX 4.10: LIGHTING ASSESSMENT of the nacelle (assumed to be at 59.5 m). This would require three lights arranged around the tower so as to be visible in all directions and therefore could result in two lights being visible 1 Introduction from some angles; 1.1 ASH design + assessment Ltd (ASH) has undertaken an assessment of the landscape and visual x Lights would be switched on at all times when ambient lighting is below 500 lux. This therefore effects of the aviation lighting proposals for the Proposed Varied Development. This assessment is assumes that in addition to the hours of darkness, lights would be on before sunset, as the sky supported by a series of Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) Figures illustrating the theoretical lightens in the morning, or on dark overcasts days; and extent of visible aviation lighting (see TA Figures 4.10.1-4.10.4)and by visualisations from four of x All lights would be steady (i.e. not flashing). However, depending on wind direction, moving the main LVIA viewpoints as agreed with The Highland Council (THC) and Scottish Natural Heritage turbine blades seen in front of lights may give an impression of flashing lights from some (SNH) (see TA Figures 4.10.5-4.10.8).
  • Control of Pine Beauty Moth by Fenitrothion in Scotland 1978 Edited by Avholden and D Bevan

    Control of Pine Beauty Moth by Fenitrothion in Scotland 1978 Edited by Avholden and D Bevan

    Control of Pine Beauty Moth by Fenitrothion in Scotland 1978 Edited by AVHolden and D Bevan Forestry Commission Forestry Commission ARCHIVE CONTENTS Page Preface ............................................................ 2 Summary and Main Conclusions ...................................... 3 Introduction ..................................................... 5 Chapter 1 The Pine beauty moth - its distribution, life cycle and importance as a pest in Scottish forests ........................................ 7 2 Discussion of aerial spraying techniques ........ 13 Preliminary Investigations 3 Selection of an insecticide for aerial application .................................... 25 4 Low volume and ultra-low volume spray trials from aircraft over Thetford Forest ............. 21 The Operation 5 Selection of spray technique and clearance procedure ...................................... 23 6 Getting off the ground .......................... 28 Results of Insecticide Application 7 Collection of spray droplets and chemical by larvae, foliage and ground deposition .......... 63 8 Larval mortality ................................ 81 Monitoring the Human Environment 9 Monitoring the pilot and aircraft ............... 84 10 Evaluation of risks to humans at ground level ... 91 Monitoring the Natural Environment 11 Deposition of fenitrothion at ground level ...... 95 12 Chemical and biological observations in streams ........................................ 103 13 The effects of fenitrothion on wildlife ......... 133 14 The effects of fenitrothion