DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2010.12820V2 [Cs.CL] 12 Apr 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2010.12820V2 [Cs.CL] 12 Apr 2021 “Nice Try, Kiddo”: Investigating Ad Hominems in Dialogue Responses Emily Sheng1, Kai-Wei Chang2, Premkumar Natarajan1, Nanyun Peng1;2 1 Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California 2 Computer Science Department, University of California, Los Angeles {ewsheng,pnataraj}@isi.edu, {kwchang,violetpeng}@cs.ucla.edu Abstract Post: Many are trying to co-opt and mischaracterize the #blacklivesmatter movement. We won’t allow it! Ad hominem attacks are those that target some Resp: I hate how much of a victim complex you guys have. feature of a person’s character instead of the Post: You’re the reason we need the #MeToo movement. position the person is maintaining. These at- Resp: Nice try, kiddo. tacks are harmful because they propagate im- Post: Stop eating them if you don’t want them to go ex- plicit biases and diminish a person’s credi- tinct! #govegan bility. Since dialogue systems respond di- Resp: I don’t like your username rectly to user input, it is important to study ad hominems in dialogue responses. To this Table 1: Ad hominem responses to Twitter posts. end, we propose categories of ad hominems, examples of ad hominem responses to Twitter posts. compose an annotated dataset, and build a classifier to analyze human and dialogue sys- Undesirable in any response, ad hominems are un- tem responses to English Twitter posts. We productive in furthering a meaningful discussion specifically compare responses to Twitter top- and can reinforce falsehoods. However, these at- ics about marginalized communities (#Black- tacks appeal to emotions and implicit biases to ar- LivesMatter, #MeToo) versus other topics gue a point, and are thus often effectively harmful (#Vegan, #WFH), because the abusive lan- regardless of whether the attacks are true, recog- guage of ad hominems could further amplify nized, or retracted (Yap, 2013). the skew of power away from marginalized populations. Furthermore, we propose a con- Our work is motivated by this fallacy’s potential strained decoding technique that uses salient to amplify the spread of harmful societal biases. n-gram similarity as a soft constraint for For communities that are already disproportion- top-k sampling to reduce the amount of ad ately harmed by societal power inequalities, ad hominems generated. Our results indicate that hominems further amplify the power imbalance. 1) responses from both humans and DialoGPT Tone policing is a type of ad hominem that seeks contain more ad hominems for discussions to regulate the emotions that a person (usually of around marginalized communities, 2) different quantities of ad hominems in the training data a marginalized population) can use to deliver their can influence the likelihood of generating ad points (e.g., not too angrily), thereby altogether hominems, and 3) we can use constrained de- invalidating the style of delivery, the person’s com- coding techniques to reduce ad hominems in petence, and the points being conveyed. Besides di- generated dialogue responses. rectly experiencing ad hominem attacks, marginal- arXiv:2010.12820v2 [cs.CL] 12 Apr 2021 ized groups could also be disproportionately dis- 1 Introduction couraged from using technologies that propagate Ad hominems attack an opponent’s character or these attacks, since abusive language from a tech- identity instead of the points the opponent is mak- nology can deter people from using the technology ing, and can exist in any conversational setting (Sood et al., 2012b). between two or more entities. From an argumen- The goal of this study is to analyze ad hominems tation perspective, ad hominems are fallacies, and in dialogue system- and human-generated re- fallacies rely on faulty reasoning to advance a point sponses for topics that vary in impact to marginal- (Hansen, 2020). These ad hominem fallacies are ized populations. Through analysis, we formulate related to abusive language, toxicity, and microag- techniques to reduce ad hominem responses and gressions, and can be expressed with both subtle thus the associated harms, which is especially im- and explicitly offensive language. Table1 presents portant for dialogue systems since these systems directly interact with users. hominems in dialogue systems is related to exam- We analyze responses from DialoGPT (Zhang ining offensive language and other harms. Lastly, et al., 2020a) and humans to English Twitter posts. we discuss existing constrained decoding methods. Specifically, we compare responses to Twitter Ad Hominems In the argumentation literature, topics about marginalized communities (#Black- theoretical ad hominems include the abusive (attack LivesMatter, #MeToo) versus other topics (#Vegan, on the opponent’s character), tu quoque (“he did #WFH). Through human annotation and trained it first”), circumstantial (accusation of hypocrisy), classifiers, we find that ad hominems exist in both and guilt by association (associating the opponent human and DialoGPT responses. Across response with someone with low credibility) (Walton, 1998; sources, there are more ad hominems in #Black- Woods, 2007). Wijze(2003) criticizes that these LivesMatter- and #MeToo-related responses, fewer textbook examples are not realistic in conversa- in #Vegan-related responses, and even fewer in tion. For more empirical categories, Habernal #WFH-related responses. The presence of more et al.(2018) propose ad hominem types based on ad hominems in responses to social issues that analysis of Reddit’s ChangeMyView discussion concern marginalized groups has troubling impli- threads, and Delobelle et al.(2019) analyze the cations about the amplified harms toward these name-calling and abusive categories. Moreover, groups. Wulczyn et al.(2017) use classifiers for a large- Given our analysis, we further propose a con- scale analysis of personal attacks in Wikipedia com- strained decoding algorithm to reduce the amount ments. We build upon prior works to define and of ad hominems generated by dialogue systems. By analyze ad hominems in a conversational setting. n using salient -gram similarity to apply soft con- Additionally, Yap(2013) discusses the harmful k straints to top- sampling, our proposed technique effects of implicit biases in forming and evaluating is simple, extensible to reducing other harms, and ad hominems. They emphasize that ad hominem does not require much additional computation. At attacks can be harmful to a person’s credibility each decoding time step, the technique compares and expertise even if the attack is recognized as the similarity between the current generated output fallacious and irrelevant to the argument. In par- and salient ad hominem versus non-ad hominem ticular, because societal norms allow biases and n -grams, possibly selecting alternative token can- stereotypes to detract from a person’s credibility didates to generate. This technique is effective at or expertise, the use of ad hominems can further reducing the amount of ad hominems generated diminish the rhetorical credibility (Govier, 1993) across topics while maintaining coherence and rel- of marginalized groups. evance. Our main contribution is a novel analysis of ad Offensive Language Detection Ad hominems hominem responses generated by humans and Di- occur in many forms and are related to differ- aloGPT across topics varying in impact to marginal- ent types of offensive language, including abu- ized communities. For this analysis, we propose sive language (Yin et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2012; empirically-derived ad hominem categories that are Nobata et al., 2016), hate speech (Warner and further verified through annotation. Furthermore, Hirschberg, 2012; Kwok and Wang, 2013; Djuric we build a new dataset of Twitter posts paired with et al., 2015), profanity (Sood et al., 2012a), and the human- and DialoGPT-generated responses, where more subtle forms of microaggressions (Breitfeller the responses have ad hominem-related labels. Fi- et al., 2019) and projecting biases and stereotypes nally, we devise a constrained decoding technique through power differentials in language (Sap et al., that uses salient n-gram similarity to steer top-k 2020). Ranging from outright insults to condescen- sampling away from ad hominem responses. We re- sion, ad hominems are a form of offensive language lease data and code at https://github.com/ that is difficult to comprehensively and objectively ewsheng/ad-hom-in-dialogue. define. Nonetheless, these responses are important to characterize, since they can irreparably damage 2 Related Work a person’s credibility. It is also generally important to identify these subtle forms of offensive language, This work is related to a broad spectrum of topics, since it is unclear if existing offensive language de- including prior definitions of ad hominems and how tection techniques are equally effective for these ad hominems facilitate biases. Also, analyzing ad subtle forms. # [post, Harms in Dialogue Systems Conversational Polarizing Affects systems are known to perpetuate several types of Topic marginalized human resp] topic group harms. Ruane et al.(2019) caution about harms that pairs can result from using conversational systems and BLM yes yes 4,037 MeToo yes yes 2,859 propose striving for trust and transparency; Roller Vegan yes no 3,697 et al.(2020) suggest techniques for chatbot safety. WFH no no 3,992 For analysis, Sheng et al.(2019) evaluate societal Total - - 14,585 biases in language generation, Curry and Rieser Table 2: Topics, rationales, and statistics for the human (2018) study how conversational systems respond response subset
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vocabulary for Conversations About Race, Gender, Equality, and Inclusivity
    Vocabulary for conversations about race, gender, equality, and inclusivity. Term/Concept Definition Abolitionism, or the abolitionist movement, is the movement to end slavery. In the Abolitionism modern era, abolition takes the form of removing state-sanctioned slavery such as the prison industrial complex and the police force. Actor: The actions of an Actor do not disrupt the status quo, much the same as a spectator at a game. Both have only a nominal effect in shifting an overall outcome. The actions of an Actor do not explicitly name or challenge the pillars of White supremacy which is necessary for meaningful progress towards racial justice. Lila Watson said, “If you have come here to help me, you’re wasting your time. If you have come because your liberation is bound up with mine, then let us work together.” Ally: An Ally is someone who is not BIPOC who acts to challenge institutionalized racism, and White supremacy. Allies constantly educate themselves, and do not speak or act only when it is convenient. E.g., When an Ally hears something inappropriate being discussed, the Ally disrupts the conversation, and takes the opportunity to educate those present. Actor/Ally/Accomplice Accomplice: An Accomplice is a non-BIPOC person whose actions are meant to directly challenge institutionalized racism, colonization, and White supremacy by blocking or impeding racist people, policies, and structures. An Accomplice realizes that all people’s freedoms and liberations are bound together, so retreat or withdrawal in the face of oppressive structures is not an option. Accomplices’ actions are informed by, directed and often coordinated with BIPOC leaders they actively listen with respect, and understand that op-pressed people are not monolithic in their tactics and beliefs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Recognitive Theory of Identity and the Structuring of Public Space
    A RECOGNITIVE THEORY OF IDENTITY AND THE STRUCTURING OF PUBLIC SPACE Benjamin Carpenter [email protected] Doctoral Thesis University of East Anglia School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies September 2020 This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution. ABSTRACT This thesis presents a theory of the self as produced through processes of recognition that unfold and are conditioned by public, political spaces. My account stresses the dynamic and continuous processes of identity formation, understanding the self as continually composed through intersubjective processes of recognition that unfold within and are conditioned by the public spaces wherein subjects appear before one another. My theory of the self informs a critique of contemporary identity politics, understanding the justice sought by such politics as hampered by identity enclosure. In contrast to my understanding of the self, the self of identity enclosure is understood as a series of connecting, philosophical pathologies that replicate conditions of oppression through their ontological, epistemological, and phenomenological positions on the self and political space. The politics of enclosure hinge upon a presumptive fixity, understanding the self as abstracted from political spaces of appearance, as a factic entity that is simply given once and for all. Beginning with Hegel's account of identity as recognised, I stress the phenomenological dimensions of recognition, using these to demonstrate how recognition requires a fundamental break from the fixity and rigidity often displayed within the politics of enclosure.
    [Show full text]
  • Engelenhovengerlov-2020-12-11.Pdf (1.651Mb)
    “WHEREOF ONE CANNOT SPEAK…” DECEPTIVE VOICES AND AGENTIVE SILENCES IN THE ARTICULATION OF IDENTITIES OF THE MOLUCCAN POSTCOLONIAL MIGRANT COMMUNITY IN THE NETHERLANDS Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie des Fachbereiches 05 der Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen vorgelegt von Gerrit Nicolaas Thomas Jacov van Engelenhoven aus Gießen 2020 Dekan: Prof. Dr. Thomas Möbius 1. Berichterstatterin: Prof. Dr. Greta Olson 2. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Frans-Willem Korsten Tag der Disputation: ASSURANCE I hereby declare that I completed the submitted doctoral thesis independently and with only the help referred to in the thesis. All texts that have been quoted verbatim or by analogy from published and non-published writings and all details based on verbal information have been identified as such. CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1 INTRODUCTION Whereof one cannot speak… My grandmother’s silence 4 Does the subaltern want to speak? 10 Rethinking voices 11 Rethinking silences 15 Deceptive voices and agentive silences 18 Overview of the chapters 19 PART ONE Anything you say can be used against you CHAPTER ONE Voices of history – The case of Martha Christina Tiahahu’s revolt and its historical reappropriations Introduction 26 Historical context of the 1817 revolt 29 Tiahahu according to Ver Huell 34 Tiahahu’s function for the justification of Dutch colonial rule 39 Tiahahu’s function for Indonesian nationalism 43 Ver Huell according to Dermoût 47 Conclusions 55 CHAPTER TWO Voices of their community? – The case of the Moluccan train
    [Show full text]
  • Disrupting the Digital Humanities
    disrupting the digital humanities Before you start to read this book, take this moment to think about making a donation to punctum books, an independent non-profit press, @ https://punctumbooks.com/support/ If you’re reading the e-book, you can click on the image below to go directly to our donations site. Any amount, no matter the size, is appreciated and will help us to keep our ship of fools afloat. Contri- butions from dedicated readers will also help us to keep our commons open and to cultivate new work that can’t find a welcoming port elsewhere. Our ad- venture is not possible without your support. Vive la Open Access. Fig. 1. Hieronymus Bosch, Ship of Fools (1490–1500) distrupting the digital humanities. Copyright © 2018 by editors and au- thors. This work carries a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 International li- cense, which means that you are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and you may also remix, transform and build upon the material, as long as you clearly attribute the work to the authors (but not in a way that suggests the authors or punctum books endorses you and your work), you do not use this work for commercial gain in any form whatsoever, and that for any remixing and transformation, you distribute your rebuild under the same license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ First published in 2018 by punctum books, Earth, Milky Way. https://punctumbooks.com ISBN-13: 978-1-947447-71-4 (print) ISBN-13: 978-1-947447-72-1 (ePDF) lccn: 2018948914 Library of Congress Cataloging Data is available from the Library of Congress Book design: Vincent W.J.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Fallacies
    List of fallacies For specific popular misconceptions, see List of common if>). The following fallacies involve inferences whose misconceptions. correctness is not guaranteed by the behavior of those log- ical connectives, and hence, which are not logically guar- A fallacy is an incorrect argument in logic and rhetoric anteed to yield true conclusions. Types of propositional fallacies: which undermines an argument’s logical validity or more generally an argument’s logical soundness. Fallacies are either formal fallacies or informal fallacies. • Affirming a disjunct – concluding that one disjunct of a logical disjunction must be false because the These are commonly used styles of argument in convinc- other disjunct is true; A or B; A, therefore not B.[8] ing people, where the focus is on communication and re- sults rather than the correctness of the logic, and may be • Affirming the consequent – the antecedent in an in- used whether the point being advanced is correct or not. dicative conditional is claimed to be true because the consequent is true; if A, then B; B, therefore A.[8] 1 Formal fallacies • Denying the antecedent – the consequent in an indicative conditional is claimed to be false because the antecedent is false; if A, then B; not A, therefore Main article: Formal fallacy not B.[8] A formal fallacy is an error in logic that can be seen in the argument’s form.[1] All formal fallacies are specific types 1.2 Quantification fallacies of non sequiturs. A quantification fallacy is an error in logic where the • Appeal to probability – is a statement that takes quantifiers of the premises are in contradiction to the something for granted because it would probably be quantifier of the conclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-05-02 Wills on Trolling
    http://social-epistemology.com ISSN: 2471-9560 Notes of the Rhetoric of Trolling Bernard Wills, Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador –––––––––––––––––– Wills, Bernard. “Notes on the Rhetoric of Trolling.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 5 (2019): 1-10. Short url: https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-48y (provided by WordPress) Vol. 8, no. 5 (2019): 1-10 https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-48y The following notes are from my personal observations on the internet phenomenon of trolling. I don’t know what a troll is and is not any more than other people do but I’ve dealt with them enough to see some common patterns.1 I cannot remember when exactly I started encountering breathtakingly insolent people on the internet but I now feel I have known them forever. At one point I went from being gob smacked to being curious. Seriously, Who Are These People? Who are these people? Do they have mothers? Kids? Are they bitter, lonely singletons? Abusive partners? Are they drunk or insane? Unfortunately, the internet gives little opportunity to investigate the matter. In very few instances have I been able to peer behind the trolling mask and glimpse an actual person. My comments then are confined to what I can observe of the troll mask and how that mask functions. Of course, they represent only the section of the trolling community that I myself have been exposed to. There are many styles of trolling (like in fashion, pop culture and gaming) that I have no significant exposure to simply because of my age, gender and professional interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Media Literacies Series
    Enough Already! Critical Media Literacies Series Series Editor William M. Reynolds (Georgia Southern University, USA) Editorial Board Peter Appelbaum (Arcadia University, USA) Jennifer Beech (University of Tennessee – Chattanooga, USA) Eleanor Blair (Western Carolina University, USA) Ana Cruz (St. Louis Community College, USA) Venus Evans-Winters (Illinois State University, USA) Julie C. Garlen (Georgia Southern University, USA) Nicholas Hartlep (Berea College, Kentucky, USA) Mark Helmsing (George Mason University, USA) Sherick Hughes (University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill, USA) Danielle Ligocki (Oakland University, USA) John Lupinacci (Washington State University, USA) Peter McLaren (Chapman University, USA) Yolanda Medina (Borough of Manhattan Community College/CUNY, USA) Brad Porfilio (Seattle University, USA) Jennifer Sandlin (Arizona State University, USA) Julie Webber (Illinois State University, USA) Handel Kashope Wright (The University of British Columbia, Canada) William Yousman (Sacred Heart University, USA) VOLUME 4 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/cmls Enough Already! A Socialist Feminist Response to the Re-emergence of Right Wing Populism and Fascism in Media By Faith Agostinone-Wilson අൾංൽൾඇ_ൻඈඌඍඈඇ This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Further information and the complete license text can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ The terms of the CC license apply only to the original material. The use of material from other sources (indicated by a reference) such as diagrams, illustrations, photos and text samples may require further permission from the respective copyright holder.
    [Show full text]
  • Enough Already! Critical Media Literacies Series
    Enough Already! Critical Media Literacies Series Series Editor William M. Reynolds (Georgia Southern University, USA) Editorial Board Peter Appelbaum (Arcadia University, USA) Jennifer Beech (University of Tennessee – Chattanooga, USA) Eleanor Blair (Western Carolina University, USA) Ana Cruz (St. Louis Community College, USA) Venus Evans-Winters (Illinois State University, USA) Julie C. Garlen (Georgia Southern University, USA) Nicholas Hartlep (Berea College, Kentucky, USA) Mark Helmsing (George Mason University, USA) Sherick Hughes (University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill, USA) Danielle Ligocki (Oakland University, USA) John Lupinacci (Washington State University, USA) Peter McLaren (Chapman University, USA) Yolanda Medina (Borough of Manhattan Community College/CUNY, USA) Brad Porfilio (Seattle University, USA) Jennifer Sandlin (Arizona State University, USA) Julie Webber (Illinois State University, USA) Handel Kashope Wright (The University of British Columbia, Canada) William Yousman (Sacred Heart University, USA) VOLUME 4 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/cmls Enough Already! A Socialist Feminist Response to the Re-emergence of Right Wing Populism and Fascism in Media By Faith Agostinone-Wilson අൾංൽൾඇ_ൻඈඌඍඈඇ This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Further information and the complete license text can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ The terms of the CC license apply only to the original material. The use of material from other sources (indicated by a reference) such as diagrams, illustrations, photos and text samples may require further permission from the respective copyright holder.
    [Show full text]
  • Master List of Logical Fallacies
    Master List of Logical Fallacies http://utminers.utep.edu/omwilliamson/ENGL1311/fallaci... Master List of Logical Fallacies Fallacies are fake or deceptive arguments, "junk cognition," that is, arguments that seem irrefutable but prove nothing. Fallacies often seem superficially sound and they far too often retain immense persuasive power even after being clearly exposed as false. Like epidemics, fallacies sometimes "burn through" entire populations, often with the most tragic results, before their power is diminished or lost. Fallacies are not always deliberate, but a good scholar’s purpose is always to identify and unmask fallacies in arguments. Note that many of these definitions overlap, but the goal here is to identify contemporary and classic fallacies as they are used in today's discourse. Effort has been made to avoid mere word-games (e.g., "The Fallacist's Fallacy," or the famous "Crocodile's Paradox" of classic times), or the so-called "fallacies" of purely formal and symbolic, business and financial, religious or theological logic. No claim is made to "academic rigor" in this listing. 1. The A Priori Argument (also, Rationalization; Dogmatism, Proof Texting.): A corrupt argument from logos, starting with a given, pre-set belief, dogma, doctrine, scripture verse, "fact" or conclusion and then searching for any reasonable or reasonable-sounding argument to rationalize, defend or justify it. Certain ideologues and religious fundamentalists are proud to use this fallacy as their primary method of "reasoning" and some are even honest enough to say so. E.g., since we know there is no such thing as "evolution," a prime duty of believers is to look for ways to explain away growing evidence, such as is found in DNA, that might suggest otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • The Teaching and Learning of Settler Citizenship in Ohio
    Reading, Writing, and Right Wing (Re)Production: The Teaching and Learning of Settler Citizenship in Ohio By Dinorah Sánchez Loza A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Lisa García Bedolla, Chair Professor Daniel Perlstein Professor Evelyn Nakano Glenn Spring 2020 Reading, Writing, and Right Wing (Re)Production: The Teaching and Learning of Settler Citizenship in Ohio © 2020 By Dinorah Sánchez Loza Abstract Reading, Writing, and Right Wing (Re)Production: The Teaching and Learning of Settler Citizenship in Ohio by Dinorah Sánchez Loza Doctor of Philosophy in Education University of California, Berkeley Professor Lisa García Bedolla, Chair This dissertation calls for a shift in the way scholars approach the role of schooling in democratic participation. Much of the scholarship documenting unequal schooling conditions exposes the absence of civic learning opportunities in under-resourced schools, and conversely, how more rigorous academics and democratic learning environments in higher resourced schools result in higher rates of youth political participation. However, more analyses are needed that interrogate the ideologies that undergird these “successful” students’ political ideas and practices and that explore how homogenous schooling environments, specifically predominantly white and politically conservative schools, impact the development of youth in these spaces. Also,
    [Show full text]
  • Live More Lives Than One V 0.3.2
    You might also enjoy my blog: https://philosophybear.substack.com/ and my subreddit: r/philosophybear LIVE MORE LIVES THAN ONE The best essays of Philosophy Bear AKA de Pony Sum, 2018–2021—revised and updated This is open beta 0.1.6—I'm looking for comments and criticism of: -Style -Grammar -Font -Formatting -Argument -Article selection -Anything else you like If you’re not already subscribed—consider subscribing to my free Substack: https://philosophybear.substack.com/ You might also enjoy my blog: https://philosophybear.substack.com/ and my subreddit: r/philosophybear Table of Contents Table of Contents 3 Preface 5 PART 1: YEARNING 6 Oh death, where is the antidote for thy sting? Or: Prolegomena to a new philosophy of the Common Task 7 Perspectival fever: On being shot through with philosophical desire 16 “The Ballad of Reading Gaol” as a rejection of all law and politics 22 On Klutzes 33 Existential tragedies—a partial list of the fundamental complaints of being a person. 37 Artificial intelligence dreams images to accompany Sufjan Stevens lyrics 39 The Culture novels and the deaestheticization of politics 47 Try to always be kind because you never know when you’re incompetent 50 300 Arguments: A commentary 52 Brief Reflections 65 The questions that haunt me at 3 in the morning 67 Autopsy on a dream 73 PART 2: LATE SOCIETY 77 Yvne: The forgotten opposite of envy 78 On critical social-technological points 79 The paranoid style in petit-bourgeois politics 81 Twitter is a reverse panopticon: The internal agent 83 The paradox of high expectations:
    [Show full text]
  • Identity: Hashtagging Race, Gender, Sexuality, and Nation
    Revised Pages #identity Revised Pages Revised Pages #identity Hashtagging Race, Gender, Sexuality, and Nation Abigail De Kosnik and Keith P. Feldman, Editors University of Michigan Press • Ann Arbor Copyright © 2019 by Abigail De Kosnik and Keith P. Feldman Some rights reserved This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License. Note to users: A Creative Commons license is only valid when it is applied by the person or entity that holds rights to the licensed work. Works may contain components (e.g., photographs, illustrations, or quotations) to which the rightsholder in the work cannot apply the license. It is ultimately your responsibility to independently evaluate the copyright status of any work or component part of a work you use, in light of your intended use. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Published in the United States of America by the University of Michigan Press Manufactured in the United States of America Printed on acid- free paper First published April 2019 A CIP catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication data has been applied for. ISBN: 978- 0- 472- 07415- 0 (Hardcover : alk paper) ISBN: 978- 0- 482- 05415- 2 (Paper : alk paper) ISBN: 978- 0- 472- 12527- 2 (ebook) ISBN: 978- 0- 472- 90109- 8 (ebook Open Access) https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9697041 This title is freely available in an open access edition with generous support from the Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]