In the Light of Evolution I: Adaptation and Complex Design

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

In the Light of Evolution I: Adaptation and Complex Design FROM THE ACADEMY: COLLOQUIUM PERSPECTIVE In the light of evolution I: Adaptation and complex design John C. Avise* and Francisco J. Ayala* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697 arwin’s elucidation of natural proves that....Totell them that it In the first article of this Colloquium, selection as a creative evolu- made it self, or sprung up by chance, Francisco Ayala (1) develops the thesis tionary force was one of the would be as ridiculous as to tell the that the Darwinian revolution in effect monumental intellectual greatest Philosopher so. completed the Copernican revolution by Dachievements in the history of science, The Wisdom of God Manifested in extending from physics to biology a no- not only revolutionizing thought across the Works of Creation tion that the universe operates by natu- the biological sciences but also funda- ral laws that fall within the purview When Darwin boarded the HMS Bea- mentally impacting much discourse in of rational scientific inquiry. In 1543, gle in 1831, he had no inkling that his the social sciences, philosophy, and reli- Nicolaus Copernicus published De revo- voyage of discovery would eventually gion. No longer were explanations for lutionibus orbium celestium (On the Rev- lead him to a revolutionary concept: the origin and marvelous adaptations of olutions of the Celestial Spheres), which that a purely natural process—natural organisms necessarily to be sought solely introduced the idea that the earth is not selection—can yield biological outcomes in the context of supernatural causation. at the center of Creation and that natu- Instead, biological outcomes could now that otherwise seem to have the ear- marks of intelligent craftsmanship. Nat- ral laws govern the motion of structures be interpreted within the critical scien- in the physical universe. This thesis was tific framework of natural processes gov- ural selection is an inevitable process of nature whenever organisms show herita- bolstered and elaborated by the scien- erned by natural processes and laws. tific discoveries of Galileo, Kepler, New- As a young man, Charles Darwin (like ble variation in their capacity to survive and reproduce in particular environ- ton, and others during the 16th and 17th most biologists of his era and before) centuries, but it was left to Darwin in was a natural theologian steeped in the ments, but the operation has no more consciousness or intelligence than do the 19th century to discover that natural notion that an attentive study of organ- laws and processes also govern the isms in nature would ineluctably serve natural physical forces such as gravity or weather. Thus, Darwin’s key legacy is emergence of apparent design in biolog- to document and further glorify the infi- ical systems. nite creative powers of the Almighty. not the mere demonstration that evolu- tion occurs (several of Darwin’s prede- Most of the remaining articles in the Darwin read and greatly admired Wil- Colloquium fall under three themes: liam Paley’s 1802 Natural Theology, cessors were aware that species evolve), but rather the stunning revelation that a Epistemological Approaches to Biocom- which eloquently developed the ‘‘argu- plexity Assessment, From Ontogeny to ment from design’’ that biological com- natural rather than a supernatural direc- Symbiosis (A Hierarchy of Complexity), plexity was prima facie evidence for an tive agent can orchestrate the evolution- and Dissecting Complex Phenotypes (Case intelligent engineer. This age-old idea ary emergence of biological adaptations. Studies). had an illustrious intellectual pedigree. Nevertheless, 150 years after Darwin the challenge of understanding nature’s For example, it had been one of the Epistemological Approaches to complexity remains in many regards in ‘‘Five Ways’’ that St. Thomas Aquinas Biocomplexity Assessment (an influential Dominican scholar of the its infancy. Only recently has science The sphere of biological phenomena 13th century) purported to prove God’s developed the necessary laboratory tools interpretable in the light of evolution is existence. In 1779, the Scottish philoso- for delving deep within the molecular vast, so perhaps it is not surprising that pher David Hume again encapsulated structure and function of genes that un- researchers from many different scien- conventional wisdom when he wrote derlie particular complex adaptations (such as the eye or the body plans of tific backgrounds and orientations have the curious adapting of means to vertebrate animals). Only recently has it weighed in on how best to approach the ends, throughout all of nature, re- become possible to conduct genomic study of complex adaptations. The arti- sembles exactly, although it much analyses in ways that permit the discov- cles under this heading will illustrate exceeds, the productions of human ery of heretofore unspecified structural some of this diversity. contrivance, of human design, and regulatory genes that contribute to Robert Hazen et al. (2) raise two im- thought, wisdom, and intelligence.... the molecular assembly of complex or- portant related questions: What actually By this argument a posteriori, and by ganismal phenotypes. Only recently have is meant by biological ‘‘complexity’’ and this argument alone, do we perceive phylogenetic methods progressed to the how might complexity be quantified? at once the existence of a Deity, and point where the histories of complex his similarity to human mind and in- phenotypes can be reliably elucidated. telligence. Scientific progress is occurring on many This paper serves as an introduction to this PNAS supple- Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion ment, which resulted from the Arthur M. Sackler Collo- related fronts as well. For example, re- quium of the National Academy of Sciences, ‘‘In the Light of The link between adaptation, biological cent developments in evolutionary ge- Evolution I: Adaptation and Complex Design,’’ held Decem- ber 1–2, 2006, at the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Center of complexity, and omnipotent design was netic theory have opened exciting new avenues for exploring the geneses and the National Academies of Sciences and Engineering in apparent not only to philosophers and Irvine, CA. It is the first in a planned series of colloquia under theologians. As phrased in the 1600s by maintenance of biological complexity at the umbrella title ‘‘In the Light of Evolution’’ (see Box 1). the Christian scholar and scientist John Ray, the levels of genetic and metabolic path- The complete program is available on the NAS web site at ways. The articles in this Colloquium www.nasonline.org/adaptation࿝and࿝complex࿝design. You may hear illiterate persons of illustrate a wide variety of current scien- Author contributions: J.C.A. and F.J.A. wrote the paper. the lowest Rank of the Commonality tific perspectives and methodological The authors declare no conflict of interest. affirming, that they need no Proof of approaches directed toward understand- *To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: the being of God, for that every Pile ing the origin and maintenance of com- [email protected] or [email protected]. of Grass, or Ear of Corn, sufficiently plex biological adaptations. © 2007 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA www.pnas.org͞cgi͞doi͞10.1073͞pnas.0702066104 PNAS ͉ May 15, 2007 ͉ vol. 104 ͉ suppl. 1 ͉ 8563–8566 Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 The authors suggest that a hallmark of Michael Lynch (7) reminds us that and cellular operations within an organ- any complex system (physical or biologi- mechanistic explanations of phenotypic ism to species’ interactions in ecological cal) is its potential to perform a quanti- evolution that emerge from the fields of communities. At any level, biological fiable operation. Starting with that developmental biology and molecular entities are enmeshed in interactive net- premise, they formally define a metric— genetics cannot violate the fundamental works that typically involve potential functional information—that basically dynamics of the evolutionary process as conflicts as well as collaborations. For describes the fraction of all possible elucidated by a century of work in theo- example, a multicellular organism can configurations of the system that possess retical population genetics. Regardless be viewed as a social collective of cells a specified degree of function. Although of which genes underlie complex or whose genes must not only collaborate this metric may be difficult to apply in other phenotypes, their microevolution- to generate a viable individual but also the real world (because it requires ary dynamics remain governed by the compete for inclusion in gametes that knowledge of all possible configurations forces of mutation, gene flow, natural will form the next generation. Articles in and the degree of function of each), it selection, recombination, and random this section deal with some of the complex nonetheless may have heuristic merit for genetic drift. The point, however, is not interactions that characterize biological studying the properties of complex to claim priority for one discipline over systems at the levels of ontogeny, multicel- systems. The authors illustrate this ap- another, but rather to emphasize that lularity, eusociality, and symbiosis. proach using a virtual world of com- any evolutionary model that disregards During ontogeny, suites of genes (and puter programs that self-replicate, population genetic reality does so at its the RNA and protein molecules
Recommended publications
  • Toward an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis 10-13 July 2008
    18th Altenberg Workshop in Theoretical Biology 2008 Toward an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis 10-13 July 2008 organized by Massimo Pigliucci and Gerd B. Müller Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research Altenberg, Austria The topic More than 60 years have passed since the conceptual integration of several strands of evolutionary theory into what has come to be called the Modern Synthesis. Despite major advances since, in all methodological and disciplinary domains of biology, the Modern Synthesis framework has remained surprisingly static and is still regarded as the standard theoretical paradigm of evolutionary biology. But for some time now there have been calls for an expansion of the Synthesis framework through the integration of more recent achievements in evolutionary theory. The challenge for the present workshop is clear: How do we make sense, conceptually, of the astounding advances in biology since the 1940s, when the Modern Synthesis was taking shape? Not only have we witnessed the molecular revolution, from the discovery of the structure of DNA to the genomic era, we are also grappling with the increasing feeling – as reflected, for example, by the proliferation of “-omics” (proteomics, metabolomics, “interactomics,” and even “phenomics”) – that we just don't have the theoretical and analytical tools necessary to make sense of the bewildering diversity and complexity of living organisms. By contrast, in organismal biology, a number of new approaches have opened up new theoretical horizons, with new possibilities
    [Show full text]
  • On the Interaction of Function, Constraint and Complexity in Evolutionary Systems
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF PHYSICAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING ELECTRONICS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE Volume 1 of 1 On The Interaction Of Function, Constraint And Complexity In Evolutionary Systems by Adam Paul Davies Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 2014 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF PHYSICAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING Electronics and Computer Science Doctor of Philosophy ON THE INTERACTION OF FUNCTION, CONSTRAINT AND COMPLEXITY IN EVOLUTIONARY SYSTEMS by Adam Paul Davies Biological evolution contains a general trend of increasing complexity of the most complex organisms. But artificial evolution experiments based on the mechanisms described in the current theory generally fail to reproduce this trend; instead, they commonly show systematic trends of complexity minimisation. In this dissertation we seek evolutionary mechanisms that can explain these apparently conflicting observations. To achieve this we use a reverse engineering approach by building computational simulations of evolution. One highlighted problem is that even if complexity is beneficial, evolutionary simulations struggle with apparent roadblocks that prevent them from scaling to complexity. Another is that even without roadblocks, it is not clear what drives evolution to become more complex at all. With respect to the former, a key roadblock is how to evolve ‘irreducibly complex’ or ‘non- decomposable’ functions. Evidence from biological evolution suggests a common way to achieve this is by combining existing functions – termed ‘tinkering’ or ‘building block evolution’. But in simulation this approach generally fails to scale across multiple levels of organisation in a recursive manner. We provide a model that identifies the problem hindering recursive evolution as increasing ‘burden’ in the form of ‘internal selection’ as joined functions become more complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Emanuele Serrelli Nathalie Gontier Editors Explanation, Interpretation
    Interdisciplinary Evolution Research 2 Emanuele Serrelli Nathalie Gontier Editors Macroevolution Explanation, Interpretation and Evidence Interdisciplinary Evolution Research Volume 2 Series editors Nathalie Gontier, Lisbon, Portugal Olga Pombo, Lisbon, Portugal [email protected] About the Series The time when only biologists studied evolution has long since passed. Accepting evolution requires us to come to terms with the fact that everything that exists must be the outcome of evolutionary processes. Today, a wide variety of academic disciplines are therefore confronted with evolutionary problems, ranging from physics and medicine, to linguistics, anthropology and sociology. Solving evolutionary problems also necessitates an inter- and transdisciplinary approach, which is why the Modern Synthesis is currently extended to include drift theory, symbiogenesis, lateral gene transfer, hybridization, epigenetics and punctuated equilibria theory. The series Interdisciplinary Evolution Research aims to provide a scholarly platform for the growing demand to examine specific evolutionary problems from the perspectives of multiple disciplines. It does not adhere to one specific academic field, one specific school of thought, or one specific evolutionary theory. Rather, books in the series thematically analyze how a variety of evolutionary fields and evolutionary theories provide insights into specific, well-defined evolutionary problems of life and the socio-cultural domain. Editors-in-chief of the series are Nathalie Gontier and Olga Pombo. The
    [Show full text]
  • Getting to Evo-Devo: Concepts and Challenges for Students Learning Evolutionary Developmental Biology Anna Hiatt
    Bryn Mawr College Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College Biology Faculty Research and Scholarship Biology 2013 Getting to Evo-Devo: Concepts and Challenges for Students Learning Evolutionary Developmental Biology Anna Hiatt Gregory K. Davis Bryn Mawr College, [email protected] Caleb Trujillo Mark Terry Donald P. French See next page for additional authors Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.brynmawr.edu/bio_pubs Part of the Biology Commons Custom Citation Hiatt A, Davis GK, Trujillo C, Terry M, French DP, Price RM and Perez KE . "Getting to evo-devo: concepts and challenges for students learning evolutionary developmental biology". CBE-Life Sciences Education 12 (2013): 494-508. This paper is posted at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College. http://repository.brynmawr.edu/bio_pubs/10 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Anna Hiatt, Gregory K. Davis, Caleb Trujillo, Mark Terry, Donald P. French, Rebecca M. Price, and Kathryn E. Perez This article is available at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College: http://repository.brynmawr.edu/ bio_pubs/10 CBE—Life Sciences Education Vol. 12, 494–508, Fall 2013 Article Getting to Evo-Devo: Concepts and Challenges for Students Learning Evolutionary Developmental Biology Anna Hiatt,*† Gregory K. Davis,‡ Caleb Trujillo,§ Mark Terry, Donald P. French,* Rebecca M. Price,¶ and Kathryn E. Perez** *Department of Zoology, Oklahoma
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution—The Extended Synthesis
    EVOLUTION—THE EXTENDED SYNTHESIS edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Gerd B. Müller The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England © 2010 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. MIT Press books may be purchased at special quantity discounts for business or sales promotional use. For information, please email [email protected] or write to Special Sales Department, The MIT Press, 55 Hayward Street, Cambridge, MA 02142. This book was set in Times Roman by Toppan Best-set Premedia Limited. Printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Evolution—the extended synthesis / edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Gerd B. Müller. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-262-51367-8 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Evolution (Biology) 2. Evolutionary genetics. 3. Developmental biology. I. Pigliucci, Massimo, 1964– II. Müller, Gerd B. QH366.2.E8627 2010 576.8—dc22 2009024587 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Index Abir-Am, Pnina, 445 Average effects, 87 Abstract gene model, 102 Avital, E., 165 Accommodation, 298, 324, 366. See also Phenotypic and genetic Badyaev, A. V., 365 accommodation Baldwin effect, 219, 257–258, 366, 367, Activator-inhibitor systems, 290 371 Adams, Paul, 220 Baldwin, James Marc, 219, 366, 367, 371 Adaptation, 163–164, 425–427 Bat wings, 268 Adaptation and Natural Selection Beaks, fi nch, 271 (Williams), 84, 88 Behavioral inheritance, 187 Adaptive cell behaviors, 268 Benkemoun, L., 153–154 Adaptive landscapes/adaptive Biodiversity, areas for future research on topographies.
    [Show full text]
  • Facilitated Variation: How Evolution Learns from Past Environments to Generalize to New Environments
    Facilitated Variation: How Evolution Learns from Past Environments To Generalize to New Environments Merav Parter., Nadav Kashtan., Uri Alon* Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel Abstract One of the striking features of evolution is the appearance of novel structures in organisms. Recently, Kirschner and Gerhart have integrated discoveries in evolution, genetics, and developmental biology to form a theory of facilitated variation (FV). The key observation is that organisms are designed such that random genetic changes are channeled in phenotypic directions that are potentially useful. An open question is how FV spontaneously emerges during evolution. Here, we address this by means of computer simulations of two well-studied model systems, logic circuits and RNA secondary structure. We find that evolution of FV is enhanced in environments that change from time to time in a systematic way: the varying environments are made of the same set of subgoals but in different combinations. We find that organisms that evolve under such varying goals not only remember their history but also generalize to future environments, exhibiting high adaptability to novel goals. Rapid adaptation is seen to goals composed of the same subgoals in novel combinations, and to goals where one of the subgoals was never seen in the history of the organism. The mechanisms for such enhanced generation of novelty (generalization) are analyzed, as is the way that organisms store information in their genomes about their past environments. Elements of facilitated variation theory, such as weak regulatory linkage, modularity, and reduced pleiotropy of mutations, evolve spontaneously under these conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Life's Irreducible Structure—Part 2: Naturalistic Objections
    Papers Life’s irreducible structure—Part 2: naturalistic objections Alex Williams In Part I of this article, I showed that autopoiesis (self-making) provides a compelling case for the intelligent design of life because all aspects of life lie beyond the reach of naturalistic explanation. Here in Part II the argument from autopoiesis is tested against commonly cited naturalistic objections to intelligent design. It comes through soundly intact, even strengthened because the opponents of design agree on the facts. They disagree on the historical inferences, but only intelligent design meets the criterion of an acceptable historical inference according to the Law of Cause and Effect. Naturalistic explanations of biological origins in the face of universally contradictory evidence depend upon faulty reasoning such as: (i) exclusion by definition and ridicule, (ii) assuming what must be proved, (iii) misinterpreting the scientific evidence, (iv) assigning unrealistic properties to the environment, and (v) misusing the concept of chance. In Polanyi’s terms, now is a very reasonable time to declare the impossibility of a naturalistic origin of life and accept that it was intelligently designed. In Part I of this article,1 I argued as follows: Note that this principle is not objective knowledge—we (i) Autopoiesis (self-making) is universal and therefore cannot visit all of time and space to verify it, so it is just a essential to life, so it is required at the beginning for convenient but necessary philosophical assumption. Most life to exist and is thus not the end product of some long people do not realize that this principle underlies all of naturalistic process.
    [Show full text]
  • Better Living Through Evolution the Science of Novelty and Complexity in Life Forms by Daniel L
    Browser-final 10/12/05 9:50 AM Page 22 formations, with insightful illustrations quirky and rambling, but somehow al- and particle/wave dualities. To get ready for provided for assistance. Those who stick ways intriguing. that day, aspiring theoretical physicists are with it are rewarded with a realistic peek How seriously should we take all this encouraged to buy a copy, for there’s much at physicists at play, seeing how they can talk of vibrating strings and parallel uni- inspiration to be found here. absorb a new concept and fashion poten- verses? Hypotheses in high-energy physics tial solutions to long-held mysteries. rise and fall on the Internet these days, Journalist and author Marcia Bartusiak is a visit- Warped Passages is more challenging than sometimes in a matter of hours. But I can ing professor in the Graduate Program in Science most popular science works, but highly imagine getting comfortable with branes Writing at the Massachusetts Institute of Technol- accessible to the physics-minded because and higher dimensions, as some of us are al- ogy. Her latest books are Einstein’s Unfinished of Randall’s lucid explanations. It’s ready accustomed to black holes, relativity, Symphony and Archives of the Universe. Better Living through Evolution The science of novelty and complexity in life forms by daniel l. hartl rançois jacob, one of the pio- are the sequences of neers in molecular biology, was in- such macromolecules terviewed a few years ago for an ed- similar, they are more ucational video now used in similar among more Harvard’s new undergraduate bi- closely related organ- Fology curriculum (Life Sciences 1b: “Ge- isms.
    [Show full text]
  • Evodevo: an Ongoing Revolution?
    philosophies Article EvoDevo: An Ongoing Revolution? Salvatore Ivan Amato Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of Messina, Via Concezione 8, 98121 Messina, Italy; [email protected] or [email protected] Received: 27 September 2020; Accepted: 2 November 2020; Published: 5 November 2020 Abstract: Since its appearance, Evolutionary Developmental Biology (EvoDevo) has been called an emerging research program, a new paradigm, a new interdisciplinary field, or even a revolution. Behind these formulas, there is the awareness that something is changing in biology. EvoDevo is characterized by a variety of accounts and by an expanding theoretical framework. From an epistemological point of view, what is the relationship between EvoDevo and previous biological tradition? Is EvoDevo the carrier of a new message about how to conceive evolution and development? Furthermore, is it necessary to rethink the way we look at both of these processes? EvoDevo represents the attempt to synthesize two logics, that of evolution and that of development, and the way we conceive one affects the other. This synthesis is far from being fulfilled, but an adequate theory of development may represent a further step towards this achievement. In this article, an epistemological analysis of EvoDevo is presented, with particular attention paid to the relations to the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) and the Standard Evolutionary Synthesis (SET). Keywords: evolutionary developmental biology; evolutionary extended synthesis; theory of development 1. Introduction: The House That Charles Built Evolutionary biology, as well as science in general, is characterized by a continuous genealogy of problems, i.e., “a kind of dialectical sequence” of problems that are “linked together in a continuous family tree” [1] (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergence, Intelligent Design, and Artificial Intelligence
    Emergence, Intelligent Design, and Artificial Intelligence Eric Scott, Andrews University 23 February, 2011 Abstract We consider the implications of emergent complexity and compu- tational simulations for the Intelligent Design movement. We discuss genetic variation and natural selection as an optimization process, and equate irreducible complexity as defined by William Dembski with the problem of local optima. We disregard the argument that method- ological naturalism bars science from investigating design hypotheses in nature a priori, but conclude that systems with low Kolmogorov complexity but a high apparent complexity, such as the Mandelbrot set, require that such hypotheses be approached with an high degree of skepticism. Finally, we suggest that computer simulations of evolu- tionary processes may be considered a laboratory to test our detailed, mechanistic understandings of evolution. 1 Introduction \Die allgemeine Form des Satzes ist: Es verh¨altsich so und so." { Das ist ein Satz von jener Art, die man sich unz¨ahlige Male wiederholt. Man glaubt, wieder and wieder der Natur nachz- ufahren, und f¨ahrtnur der Form entlang, durch die wir sie betra- chten. \The general form of propositions is: This is how things are." { That is the kind of proposition one repeats to himself countless times. One thinks that one is tracing nature over and over again, and one is merely tracing round the frame through which we look at it. { Ludwig Wittgenstein1 The origin of life's immense complexity and adaptability is tantalizing in at least two respects: 1) We want to understand where we and our world came from, and 2) We want to imitate nature in our engineering projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution & Development
    Received: 28 March 2019 | Revised: 5 August 2019 | Accepted: 6 August 2019 DOI: 10.1111/ede.12312 RESEARCH Developmental bias in the fossil record Illiam S. C. Jackson Department of Biology, Lund University, Sweden Abstract The role of developmental bias and plasticity in evolution is a central research Correspondence interest in evolutionary biology. Studies of these concepts and related Illiam S. C. Jackson, Lund University, Sweden. processes are usually conducted on extant systems and have seen limited Email: [email protected] investigation in the fossil record. Here, I identify plasticity‐led evolution (PLE) as a form of developmental bias accessible through scrutiny of paleontological Funding information Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse, material. I summarize the process of PLE and describe it in terms of the Grant/Award Number: KAW 2012.0155 environmentally mediated accumulation and release of cryptic genetic variation. Given this structure, I then predict its manifestation in the fossil record, discuss its similarity to quantum evolution and punctuated equili- brium, and argue that these describe macroevolutionary patterns concordant with PLE. Finally, I suggest methods and directions towards providing evidence of PLE in the fossil record and conclude that such endeavors are likely to be highly rewarding. KEYWORDS cryptic genetic variation, developmental bias, plasticity‐led evolution 1 | INTRODUCTION we might expect to result from PLE in the fossil record, anchor these patterns in historical work and suggest Developmental bias describes the manner in which methods and future directions for examining PLE using certain changes to development are more accessible to fossil data. evolution than others (Arthur, 2004). A key generator of developmental bias, and integral to understanding its role in evolution, is developmental plasticity, which 2 | CONSTRUCTIVE refers to an organism’s ability to adjust its phenotype in DEVELOPMENT response to environmental conditions (Laland et al., 2015; Schwab, Casasa, & Moczek, 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • The Prodigal Genetics Returns: Integrating Gene Regulatory Net- Work Theory Into Evolutionary Theory
    THE PRODIGAL GENETICS RETURNS: INTEGRATING GENE REGULATORY NET- WORK THEORY INTO EVOLUTIONARY THEORY by Aaron Michael Novick BA, The College of Wooster, 2012 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of PhD University of Pittsburgh 2018 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBRUGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Aaron Michael Novick It was defended on September 05, 2018 and approved by James Woodward, Distinguished Professor, History and Philosophy of Science Mark Wilson, Distinguished Professor, Philosophy Sandra Mitchell, Distinguished Professor, History and Philosophy of Science Mark Rebeiz, Associate Professor, Biological Sciences Dissertation Director: James Lennox, Emeritus Professor, History and Philosophy of Science ii THE PRODIGAL GENETICS RETURNS: INTEGRATING GENE REGULATORY NETWORK THEORY INTO EVOLUTIONARY THEORY Aaron Michael Novick, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2018 The aim of this dissertation is to show how gene regulatory network (GRN) theory can be integrated into evolutionary theory. GRN theory, which lies at the core of evolution- ary-developmental biology (evo-devo), concerns the role of gene regulation in driving developmental processes, covering both how these networks function and how they evolve. Evolutionary and developmental biology, however, have long had an uneasy re- lationship. Developmental biology played little role in the establishment of a genetic the- ory evolution during the modern synthesis of the early to mid 20th century. As a result, the body of evolutionary theory that descends from the synthesis period largely lacks obvious loci for integrating the information provided by GRN theory. Indeed, the rela- tionship between the two has commonly been perceived, by both scientists and philoso- phers, as one of conflict.
    [Show full text]