Investigative Files the Secrets of Oak Island Joe Nickell
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Treasure Act 1996 Code of Practice (2Nd Revision)
The Treasure Act 1996 Code of Practice (2nd Revision) ENGLAND & WALES improving the quality of life for all Our aim is to improve the quality of life for all through cultural and sporting activities, support the pursuit of excellence, and champion the tourism, creative and leisure industries. The Treasure Act Code of Practice (Revised) 3 Introduction Notes: This Code has effect in England and Wales; a separate code has been prepared for Northern Ireland. A Welsh language version of the Code is available on request from the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. When the term ‘national museum’ is used in this document it is intended to refer to the British Museum in the case of finds from England and the National Museums & Galleries of Wales in the case of finds from Wales. References to the ‘Secretary of State’ are to the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport. If finders or others need further advice about any matters relating to the Treasure Act or this Code, then they are recommended to contact the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, the British Museum or (for Wales) the National Museums & Galleries of Wales or their local finds liaison officer. Addresses and telephone numbers are given in Appendix 2. In many places this Code gives examples of what may or may not constitute treasure and provides advice as to how coroners may approach an inquest. It is intended to provide guidance for all those concerned with treasure. It is emphasised, however, that questions of whether or not any object constitutes treasure and how a coroner should conduct an inquiry into treasure are for the coroner to decide on the facts and circumstances of each case. -
Oak Island Mystery
Oak Island Mystery Mars Stirhaven March 15, 2019 Mars Stirhaven Oak Island Mystery March 15, 2019 1 / 28 • I would like to thank the organizers for giving me this opportunity to present this material. • I promised one of the organizers that I would start the talk wearing the Mexican wrestling mask. • Nearly everyone here knows me and would easily recognize me before the \dramatic" reveal so... Mars Stirhaven Oak Island Mystery March 15, 2019 2 / 28 This will have to suffice... Mars Stirhaven Oak Island Mystery March 15, 2019 3 / 28 Publishing a Book • Since you know me and you know how much I hate writing up anything (except code), you're surely as surprised as I am that I wrote a book. • My Amazon Author Bio says I hate writing (which might be a first for an author) and everything I wrote was absolutely true! • I used a pen name for anonymity concerns and because not divulging my affiliations made the prepub process easier and faster. • I used the Mexican wrestling mask (won in a mathematics contest) and a Gold Bug pendant (also an award) for my Bio pics (for which Facebook has banned my Stirhaven account!). Mars Stirhaven Oak Island Mystery March 15, 2019 4 / 28 Publicizing a Result • It turns out publicizing a result is hard work{especially for someone who doesn't want to do it. • Most of the book reviews have been amazing, especially from the reddit crowd, but I just got my first scathing review. • I wanted to reply and correct all the errors in the review but goodreads, and my wife, continue to strongly suggest that authors should not respond to negative reviews. -
Response to Consultation on Revising the Definition of Treasure in The
Revising the definition of treasure in the Treasure Act 1996 and revising the related codes of practice Response Form You can reply to the consultation by downloading and completing this response form and sending it to [email protected]. You do not have to reply to all parts of the consultation, you can reply only to the parts that interest you. The Response Form contains a Disclosure of Responses statement which you must read, understand and agree. If you do not your response may be considered invalid and would not be considered as part of the consultation. Instructions Open and save the form, including your name or organisation in the title. Please click on the grey area in each box in order to type in your answer. There is a 1250 character limit (including spaces) for responses on the form. Please email [email protected] if you have any difficulties with the form. Disclosure of responses and Data Protection The Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), 100 Parliament St Westminster, London SW1A 2BQ, is the data controller in respect of any information you provide in your answers. Your personal data is being collected and processed by DCMS, which processes your personal data on the basis of informed consent. We will hold the data you provide for a maximum of 2 years. You can find out more here: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-digital- culture-media-sport/about/personal-information-charter We will process the names and addresses and email addresses provided by respondents, and information about which organisations respondents belong to, where this is provided. -
A Hint in the Oak Island Treasure Mystery 457
! : Ro.ss W ilh.elm THE SPANISH IN NOV A SCOTIA IN THE I I SIXTEENTII CENTURY-A HINT IN . ::: I . J i THE OAK ISLAND TREASURE MYSTERY I I i .; Introduction OVER THE PAsT one hundred years one of the standard pirate and treasure seeking stories has been the "Oak Island Mystery." Oak Island is in Mahone Bay, Lunenburg County, Nova Scotia, and is about forty-five miles from Halifax, on the Atlantic Coast. For the past 175 years various groups have been digging on the island for what is believed to be a huge buried pirate or Inca treasure. All efforts to date have been frustrated by the intrusion of unlimited amounts of sea water into the diggings. The sea water enters the "treasure" area through an elaborate system of man-made drains or tunnels, one of which is hundreds of feet long and quilt similar to a stone sewer tunnel. While the findings of the treasure hunters indicate the probable existence of some type of treasure vault on the island, the main purpose of this paper is not to document further the efforts of the treasure hunters beyond what has been set forth in DesBrisay's History of the County of Lunenburg 2 Nova Scotia\ or in Harris' book The Oak Island Mystery , or in the numerous 3 accounts of the efforts in the mass media • The purpose of this paper is to show that there is evidence that seems to indicate that an agent of Philip II of Spain, or one of the other kings of Spain in the sixteenth century, built the Oak Island installation. -
Ancestors of Bessie Cone Norton
Ancestors of Bessie Cone Norton Paul Tocci Ancestors of Bessie Cone Norton First Generation 1. Bessie Cone Norton-[2223],1 daughter of Frederick Harrison Norton-[1] and Bessie Ilean Wright-[1112], was born on 21 Mar 1914 in Tusculum, Georgia, died on 5 Oct 1971 in Baltimore (City), Maryland at age 57, and was buried on 8 Oct 1971 in Meadow Ridge Cemetery, Elkridge, MD. General Notes: Grandmom made up her own words including these below. There is no "official" spelings since they were all verbal. The spellings below are phoenetic. koogle: feces. Instead of her kids saying they had to poop, she had them say they had to koogle. Koogle was the brand name for a flavored peanut butter marketed by Kraft Foods. Kraft introduced Koogle in 1971, and discontinued it later that decade. It was available in several flavors, including chocolate , cinnamon, strawberry, vanilla and banana. fewta fanta fiola: something she would chant when she was happy calamagra: bruzzy: soft, fuzzy blanket or sweater used to keep warm goozlum: any gravy like food muzry: person or animal that has a sweet, lovable appearance (that cat has a muzry face) Bessie married Nile August Fish Sr-[2] [MRIN: 3], son of Wilson Fish-[2163] and Melissa Isabel Longmire-[2288], on 23 Apr 1929 in Effingham County, Georgia.2 Marriage Notes: 1 NOTE 1930 United States Federal Census Nile Fish 28 1901 Iowa Head White Election District 15,Baltimore, MD Bessie Fish 16 1913 WifeElection District 15, Baltimore, MD Children from this marriage were: i. Niton Dwight Fish-[113] ii. -
Treasure Act 1996
Finders keepers? Treasure Act 1996 22 MARCH 2010 CATEGORY: ARTICLE The discovery of the Staffordshire Hoard in July 2009 brought the law relating to the ownership of treasure back into the headlines. Currently in storage at the British Museum, the largest Anglo-Saxon hoard of gold ever found has now been valued at £3.25 million. Treasure belongs to the Crown and a key concern for landowners is whether they own or have any rights over items found on their land. ‘Treasure’ is dened in the Treasure Act 1996 (the ‘Act’) as any object that is at least three hundred years old at the date it is found and which has at least a 10 per cent gold or silver content. Coins must be found as a group to be classed as treasure. Anything found with treasure is also included, as is anything at least two hundred years old, but designated by the Secretary of State as being of ‘outstanding historical, archaeological or cultural importance’. This currently includes pre-historic base-metal assemblages. There is a legal obligation for treasure nders to notify the local coroner within fourteen days of making a nd, or realising a nd was treasure. To fail to do so is a criminal offence, punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of three months or a ne of £5,000. The Act introduced a Treasure Valuation Committee which values the nd and determines the reward. The standard recommendation is for the reward to be divided equally between the landowner and the nder, as happened with the Staffordshire Hoard. -
Prehistoric Britain
Prehistoric Britain Plated disc brooch Kent, England Late 6th or early 7th century AD Bronze boars from the Hounslow Hoard 1st century BC-1st century AD Hounslow, Middlesex, England Visit resource for teachers Key Stage 2 Prehistoric Britain Contents Before your visit Background information Resources Gallery information Preliminary activities During your visit Gallery activities: introduction for teachers Gallery activities: briefings for adult helpers Gallery activity: Neolithic mystery objects Gallery activity: Looking good in the Neolithic Gallery activity: Neolithic farmers Gallery activity: Bronze Age pot Gallery activity: Iron Age design Gallery activity: An Iron Age hoard After your visit Follow-up activities Prehistoric Britain Before your visit Prehistoric Britain Before your visit Background information Prehistoric Britain Archaeologists and historians use the term ‘Prehistory’ to refer to a time in a people’s history before they used a written language. In Britain the term Prehistory refers to the period before Britain became part of the Roman empire in AD 43. The prehistoric period in Britain lasted for hundreds of thousands of years and this long period of time is usually divided into: Palaeolithic, Mesolithic, Neolithic (sometimes these three periods are combined and called the Stone Age), Bronze Age and Iron Age. Each of these periods might also be sub-divided into early, middle and late. The Palaeolithic is often divided into lower, middle and upper. Early Britain British Isles: Humans probably first arrived in Britain around 800,000 BC. These early inhabitants had to cope with extreme environmental changes and they left Britain at least seven times when conditions became too bad. -
A Tale of Two Prosecutions: Prosecuting Heritage Crime in England and the United States, a Cautionary Tale
This is a repository copy of A Tale of Two Prosecutions: Prosecuting Heritage Crime in England and the United States, a Cautionary Tale. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/98932/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Shelbourn, C.H. (2014) A Tale of Two Prosecutions: Prosecuting Heritage Crime in England and the United States, a Cautionary Tale. Art Antiquity and Law, XIX (3). pp. 253-264. ISSN 1362-2331 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ 1 Caveat: author version A TALE OF TWO PROSECUTIONS: PROSECUTING HERITAGE CRIME IN ENGLAND AND THE UNITED STATES, A CAUTIONARY TALE. INTRODUCTION In an ideal world the protection of a nation’s cultural heritage would not depend on the use of the criminal law, but in the real world it is a sad fact that it does. -
Warrior Heroes Or Warrior Bullies? Debra Lustig and Carlee A
The South Station Hoard Imagining, Creating, and Empowering Violent Remains Carlee A. Bradbury Karie Edwards Debra Lustig Katie Sickman Courtney Weida Academic Discourse Fictionalized Records Creative Process The Lockers One 9 On Hoards: Project Introduction Carlee A. Bradbury Two 19 Visual Prologue Karie Edwards Three 43 Fictional Narratives, Archeologist’s Notes, Primary Sources Found in the Future Carlee A. Bradbury Four 55 Warrior Heroes or Warrior Bullies? Debra Lustig and Carlee A. Bradbury Five 87 Making South Station: Processes for Visualization and Construction Karie Edwards Six 97 Opening the Locker: Constructing the Design Identity Katie Sickman Seven 107 Gendering the Hoard: The Visual Culture of Tween Girls Courtney L. Weida Eight 145 Closing the Book, Leaving the Locker Open Carlee A. Bradbury Appendix 1 151 Lesson Plan Courtney L. Weida Resources 161 Endnotes Locker One On Hoards: Project Introduction Carlee A. Bradbury South Station Hoard Introduction This collaborative arts research project compares the landmark discovery of the Staffordshire Hoard, the largest hoard of Anglo-Saxon gold and silver metalwork discovered in 2009, with an imagined hoard from present day pre-adolescent girls. We constructed a subterranean installation, generated speculative historical documents, collected and embellished social networking “artifacts,” and photographed the entire process. In addition to dealing with the notion of a medieval hoard as a signifier of a medieval warrior as both hero and anti-hero, we address contemporary issues relating to gender, youth culture, bullying, adolescent development, iconicity, status symbols, and additional contemporary tween issues. Our fabricated hoard was stashed away in a long forgotten locker in Boston’s South Station by a group of tween girls in 2012 and found by a group of archaeologists in the year 2812. -
Reviewing the Treasure
E M E H C S S E I T I U Q I T N A E L B A T R O P Reviewing the Treasure Act The consultation closes on The government has launched a review of the Treasure April 30: to comment go to www.gov.uk/government/news/ Act 1996. To help readers respond to caasne i ni mScoptlaondr;t tahant etd upcautibonlail c gTorevaesurrnem. “Wenet -araen anwoauren”,c seasys- tnhee w- outreach to the detecting community prelpaonrst,- “ttoh-atp trhoetree cmt-aytr beea ssoumree -finds consultation, BritAi scohns uAltartciohn oane prooplosaglsy preshsoeuldn btes im cporomvedm to eencnoutraagrei es feeling that defining a find by its from a wide rangeto uopfd aptee thres Tpreeasucrte iAvcet s finds reporting and adherence to the monetary value could overshadow the What d19o96e cso dtehs eof practice, revise detecting code of practice; and that archaeological or historic importance consulthtae dteiofinit iponr ofp Toresaesu?re archaeological excavation of any kind, that it may have.” However, it and commence relevant by professional archaeologists or others, continues, the act seeks to preserve provisions in the Coroners would need a permit, as is currently the objects of national importance for & Justice Act 2009 was case in Northern Ireland. “We are public enjoyment. Research has launched on February 1. aware”, says the report, “that these shown market price to be the best It is hoped proposed suggestions would involve considerable indicator of rare and important changes would preserve changes to the current process.” objects that currently escape the more significant finds for For now Treasure is defined as any Treasure definition. -
The Law and Practice Regarding Coin Finds
THE LAW AND PRACTICE REGARDING COIN FINDS Treasure Trove Law in the United States John M. Kleeberg, Esq.* The United States, although a comparatively young country, has been the site of some remarkable archaeological discoveries. Litigation has concerned such remark- able objects as a statue of King George III that was hacked into pieces by patriots in 1776 1 and a prehistoric Indian canoe.2 The United States has also been the site of the discovery of large money hoards. One hoard discovered in Baltimore in August 1934 consisted of 3,558 United States gold pieces.3 Another hoard, discovered in Puerto Rico in March 1990, comprised $43 million in currency.4 Coin hoards are not found as frequently as in Europe. Coinage has been in gener- al use in what is now the continental United States for less than four hundred years. The earliest date of deposit for a coin hoard in what is now the continental United States is 1631.5 Coin hoards sensu stricto (i.e., not including finds of paper money) are found in the continental United States at the rate of about three every year.6 In England and Wales, by contrast, coin hoards are found at the rate of twenty to forty every year.7 England and Wales have a much smaller population and area, but that area has used coinage for two millennia. Furthermore, for much of the period that * B.A., Yale, 1979; D.Phil., Oxford, 1988; J.D., New York University School of Law, 2003. The author was Curator of Modern Coins and Currency at The American Numismatic Soci- ety in New York, 1990-2000. -
Oak Island from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia This Article Is About the Oak Island in Nova Scotia
Coordinates: 44°30′46.9″N 64°17′17.9″W Oak Island From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This article is about the Oak Island in Nova Scotia. For other uses, see Oak Island (disambiguation). Oak Island is a 57-hectare (140- Oak Island acre) island in Lunenburg County on the south shore of Nova Scotia, Canada. The tree-covered island is one of about 360 small islands in Mahone Bay and rises to a maximum of 11 metres (36 feet) above sea level. Located 200 metres (660 feet) from shore and connected to the mainland by a modern causeway, the island is privately owned. Oak Island is noted as the location of the so-called Money Pit and the Oak Island, Nova Scotia site of over 200 years of treasure Geography hunting.[1] Repeated excavations have reported layers of apparently Location Nova Scotia, Canada human-made artifacts as deep as Coordinates 44°30′46.9″N 31 metres (102 ft), but ended in 64°17′17.9″W collapsed excavations and flooding. Critics argue that there is no Total islands 1 treasure and that the pit is a Area 57 ha (140 acres) natural phenomenon, likely a Highest elevation 11 m (36 ft) sinkhole.[2] Country Canada Contents Province Nova Scotia Demographics 1 History of the Money Pit Population Unknown 1.1 Early accounts 1.2 Oak Island Association and Old Gold Salvage group 1.3 Gilbert Hedden and William Chappell 1.4 Restall family and Robert Dunfield 1.5 Triton Alliance 1.6 Oak Island Tours Inc. 2 Explanations of origin 2.1 Pirate treasure 2.2 Naval treasure 2.3 Marie Antoinette's jewels 2.4 Shakespeare manuscripts 2.5 Knights Templar treasure 2.6 Freemasonry 2.7 Viking ship 2.8 Decoy 2.9 Natural sinkhole 3 Pit flooding 4 Non-fictional and fictional accounts 5 Television 6 References 7 External links History of the Money Pit Early accounts There are many 19th-century accounts of Oak Island, but some are conflicting or biased.[2] Further, physical evidence from the initial excavations is absent or has been lost.