DOCSLIB.ORG

Deepwater Wind, LLC Revolution Wind Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Deepwater Wind, LLC Revolution Wind Project Deepwater Wind, LLC with GridAmerica Holdings Inc. and FirstLight Power Resources Management, LLC Proposal for the sale of Energy and RECs from the: Revolution Wind Project in response to: The Request for Proposals for Long-Term Contracts for Offshore Wind Energy Projects issued by Electric Distribution Companies in Massachusetts and Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources. RFP Issuance Date: June 29, 2017 Submission Date: December 20, 2017 submitted to: The Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources and Distribution Companies, which include: Fitchburg Gas & Electric Light Company d/b/a Unitil Massachusetts Electric Company d/b/a National Grid Nantucket Electric Company d/b/a National Grid NSTAR Electric Company d/b/a Eversource Western Massachusetts Electric Company d/b/a Eversource REVOLUTION WIND PROJECT DECEMBER 20, 2017 Certain data contained in this document or electronic file, as well as the appendices listed below, which hereby forms a part of the Proposal have been submitted in confidence and contain trade secrets or proprietary information, and Deepwater Wind and GridAmerica request confidential treatment of such parts of the Proposal as provided in Section 1.7.4 of the Request for Proposals. Deepwater Wind and GridAmerica request that the data marked with a double blue underline not be disclosed as such information is confidential and proprietary and exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. Table of Contents Section 1: Certification, Project and Pricing Data .........................................................................................1 Section 2: Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................3 2.1: 83C Proposal Introduction ..................................................................................................................3 2.1.1: Saving Money for Ratepayers with Low Pricing .....................................................................3 2.1.2: Smaller Projects to Promote Long Term Cost-Effectiveness .................................................4 2.1.3: Pairing Wind and Storage to Replace Retiring Capacity .......................................................4 2.1.4: Planning for Incremental, Expandable Transmission ............................................................5 2.2: Bidder Introduction .............................................................................................................................7 2.2.1: Deepwater Wind .........................................................................................................................7 2.2.2: GridAmerica ...............................................................................................................................8 2.2.3: FirstLight ....................................................................................................................................8 2.3: Wind Farm Project Definition .............................................................................................................9 2.4: Delivery Facility Project Definition ..................................................................................................12 2.5: Storage Facility Project Definition ....................................................................................................14 2.6: Overview of Offers ...........................................................................................................................16 2.6.1: Wind Farm ................................................................................................................................16 2.6.2: Storage Feature ........................................................................................................................17 2.7: Satisfaction of Evaluation and Selection Criteria .............................................................................18 2.7.1: Stage One: Eligibility and Threshold Requirements ............................................................18 2.7.2: Stage Two: Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis ...............................................................18 2.7.3: Stage Three: Portfolio Considerations ...................................................................................19 Section 3: Operational Parameters ...............................................................................................................20 3.1: Maintenance Outage Requirements ..................................................................................................20 3.1.1: Wind Farm ................................................................................................................................20 3.1.2: Delivery Facility ........................................................................................................................21 3.1.3: Storage Facility .........................................................................................................................21 3.2: Operating Constraints ........................................................................................................................21 3.2.1: Wind Farm ................................................................................................................................21 3.2.2: Delivery Facility ........................................................................................................................21 DEEPWATER WIND Page ii REVOLUTION WIND PROJECT DECEMBER 20, 2017 3.3: Reliability ..........................................................................................................................................22 3.4: Moderation of System Peak Load .....................................................................................................23 3.4.1: Wind Farm ................................................................................................................................23 3.4.2: Storage Facility .........................................................................................................................24 3.5: Development Stage of Facility ..........................................................................................................24 3.5.1: Wind Farm ................................................................................................................................24 3.5.2: Delivery Facility ........................................................................................................................24 3.5.3: Storage Facility .........................................................................................................................25 Section 4: Energy Resource and Delivery Plan ...........................................................................................26 4.1: Energy Resource Plan .......................................................................................................................26 4.2: Offshore Wind Energy Generation Delivery Plan ............................................................................30 4.2.1: Wind Farm ................................................................................................................................30 4.2.2: Storage Facility .........................................................................................................................30 4.3: REC / Environmental Attribute Delivery Plan ..................................................................................31 4.3.1: Wind Farm ................................................................................................................................31 4.3.2: Storage Facility .........................................................................................................................31 Section 5: Financial / Legal .........................................................................................................................32 5.1: Approach to Financing ......................................................................................................................32 5.2: Bidder’s Organization .......................................................................................................................32 5.3: Financing Plan ...................................................................................................................................32 5.4: Financing Experience ........................................................................................................................33 5.4.1: Deepwater Wind .......................................................................................................................34 5.4.2: GridAmerica .............................................................................................................................34 5.4.3: FirstLight ..................................................................................................................................34 5.5: Financial Resources ..........................................................................................................................34 5.5.1: Deepwater Wind .......................................................................................................................34 5.5.2: GridAmerica .............................................................................................................................34 5.5.3: FirstLight ..................................................................................................................................34
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment
    U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment Issue Date | March 2020 Prepared By American Wind Energy Association Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Current Status of U.S. Offshore Wind .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Lessons from Land-based Wind ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Announced Investments in Domestic Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................ 5 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Input Assumptions ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Modeling Tool ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule MPS-1 Page 1 of 9
    Grain Belt Express Clean Line Additional Information on Qualifications and Experience of Selected Clean Line Management Team Members and Employees Michael Skelly President and CEO Horizon Wind Energy – Chief Development Officer . Built and developed over 2,600 MW of electric projects, including: Blue Canyon V Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Pine Tree Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Rail Splitter Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Rattlesnake Road Wind Farm, Twin Groves II Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Meridian Way I & II Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Lone Star II Wind Farm, Pioneer Prairie I & II Wind Farm, Prairie Star Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Twin Groves I Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Lone Star I Wind Farm, Elkhorn Wind Farm, Maple Ridge I & II Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Wild Horse Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Blue Canyon I & II Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Mill Run Wind Farm, Somerset Wind Farm, Top of Iowa Wind Farm, Madison Wind Farm, Tierras Morenas Wind Farm. Participated in construction supervision, onsite inspections, the review of quality assurance/quality control procedures, the implementation of safety strategies, and resolving logistical issues of wind farms and generation tie lines. Responsible for purchasing equipment from wind turbine manufacturers. Responsible for negotiating EPC contracts for both equipment and construction, hiring construction supervision teams, negotiating balance of plant contracts for the turbine equipment, and performing development activities, including land acquisition, permitting, and turbine siting. Wayne Galli, Ph.D, P.E. Executive Vice President, Transmission and Technical Services NextEra Energy Resources – Director, Transmission Development ▪ Responsible for routing, siting and engineering for approximately 330 miles of new transmission lines, including HVDC lines for the CREZ Transmission Projects in Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Deepwater Wind Plans Offshore Wind Farm to Serve Maryland
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE MEDIA CONTACT: Meaghan Wims 401.278.4434, [email protected] Deepwater Wind Plans Offshore Wind Farm to Serve Maryland Skipjack Wind Farm Will Deliver Affordable Offshore Wind Energy Far Below State Estimates, Saving Ratepayers Millions of Dollars Ocean City, Md. – November 22, 2016 – America’s leading offshore wind company Deepwater Wind today announced plans for the Skipjack Wind Farm, a new offshore wind farm that will help Maryland meet its clean-energy goals at far lower prices than state law anticipates, saving Maryland ratepayers millions of dollars. The Skipjack Wind Farm will not only be the state’s largest renewable energy project, it would also be the right size for Maryland’s first offshore wind farm. At 120 megawatts, the Skipjack Wind Farm could be built in a single construction season, and developed more cost-effectively, and with considerably less risk, than a larger project. At more than 17 nautical miles northeast of Ocean City’s coastline, the project would be located so far away that it won’t impact views from Maryland’s shore. Deepwater Wind has secured the rights to acquire the site’s federal lease, subject to regulatory approval. “We’re bringing down the cost of American offshore wind energy in a big way,” said Deepwater Wind CEO Jeffrey Grybowski. “Ratepayers in Maryland will benefit from energy that is both clean and affordable. The Skipjack Wind Farm is the right clean energy solution for Maryland, and we’re ready to get to work.” The Skipjack Wind Farm is expected to generate well over $100 million dollars in economic benefits for Maryland.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Market Report
    US OFFSHORE WIND MARKET UPDATE & INSIGHTS US OFFSHORE WIND CAPACITY GENERATION The US Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Ocean and Energy Management (BOEM), has auctioned 16 US offshore wind energy areas (WEAs) designated in federal waters for offshore wind development. Each area has been leased to a qualified offshore wind developer. The ar- eas are located along the East Coast from North Carolina to Massachusetts and represent a total potential capacity of 21,000 Megawatts (MWs) of offshore wind power generation. HISTORY OF BOEM AUCTIONS AND LEASES YEAR LEASE # LESSEE STATE ACREAGE BID MW* NEXT 2012 0482 GSOE I DE 70,098 NA NA SAP *Reading volumes, some earlier estimates 2013 0486 Deepwater Wind NE RI/MA 97,498 $3,838,288 3400 TTL COP of capacity likely used 2013 0487 Deepwater Wind NE RI/MA 67,252 $3,838,288 3400 TTL FDR different calculations. 2013 0483 VA Electric & Power Co. VA 112,799 $1,600,000 2000 COP In all cases, capacity 2014 0490 US Wind MD 79,707 $8,701,098 1450 COP calculations should be considered estimates. 2015 0501 Vineyard Wind MA 166,886 $166,886 See Below FDR 2015 0500 Bay State Wind MA 187,523 $281,285 2000 TTL COP 2016 0498 Ocean Wind NJ 160,480 $880,715 See Below COP 2016 0499 EDFR Development NJ 183,353 $1,006,240 3400 TTL SAP 2017 0512 Equinor Wind US NY 79,350 $42,469,725 1000 COP 2017 0508 Avangrid Renewables NC 122,405 $9,066,650 1486 SAP 2018 0519 Skipjack Offshore Energy DE 26,332 Assigned NA SAP 2018 0520 Equinor Wind US MA 128,811 $135,000,000 1300 EXEC 2018 0521 Mayflower Wind Energy MA 127,388 $135,000,000 1300 EXEC 2018 0522 Vineyard Wind MA 132,370 $135,000,000 1500 EXEC EXEC—Lease Execution SAP—Site Assessment Plan COP—Construction & Operations Plan FDR—Facility Design Report @offshorewindus / BUSINESS NETWORK FOR OFFSHORE WIND / offshorewindus.org 1 STATE 2018 2019 MARKET GROWTH The US Offshore Wind market currently stands VIRGINIA 12 12 at 16,970 MWs and is a subset of the total US MARYLAND 366 366 potential generation capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind Summit September 25, 30, and October 7
    Offshore Wind Summit September 25, 30, and October 7, 2020 National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & The Embassy of Denmark 1 Introductory Remarks Jessica Rackley, Energy & Environment Program Director, NGA Center for Best Practices Michael Guldbrandtsen, Counselor, Embassy of Denmark Thank You to our Sponsors States with Clean Energy Goals Source: NGA, 2020 Offshore Wind Technical Potential Source: NREL, 2016 Offshore Wind Energy Resource Assessment for the United States Today’s Virtual Meeting: Zoom Controls The Zoom menu bar appears at the If you don’t see the menu bar, move your bottom of the Zoom window once the meeting begins. mouse slightly and the bar will appear. Chat your questions Introductory Remarks Michael Guldbrandtsen Counselor Embassy of Denmark Welcome Remarks Tim Blute Director NGA Center for Best Practices Introduction to the Day – Offshore Wind Update Thomas Brostrøm CEO Ørsted North America, Offshore Offshore Wind Summit Thomas Brostrøm, CEO Ørsted North America, Offshore Offshore Wind Update September 25, 2020 Ranked most sustainable company in the world 2 Significant transformation of Ørsted over the past decade 1 Note 1: Figures taken from Ørsted’s Annual Report 2019. Excluding Radius (power distribution business which was divested during 2019) Note 2: ROCE target for 2019-2025 3 Note 3: International share calculated based on Group EBITDA excl. divestments and miscellaneous un-allocated costs totalling 16 DKKbn The first major energy company to reach net-zero emissions in its energy generation – We will become carbon neutral by 2025. – This will make Ørsted the first major energy company to reach net-zero emissions in its energy generation – far ahead of science-based decarbonization targets for limiting global warming to 1.5°C.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Offshore Wind Market Report & Insights 2020
    RAMPION OFFSHORE WIND FARM — COURTESY OF ATKINS THE BUSINESS NETWORK FOR OFFSHORE WIND U.S. OFFSHORE WIND MARKET REPORT & INSIGHTS 2020 MEMBERS ONLY The Business Network for Offshore Wind’s2020 U.S. Offshore Wind Market and Insights offers an analysis of federal and state government activity to better understand how it may affect your business planning and the industry holistically. The federal government has turned its attention to the burgeoning industry to offer more regulation. Congress and federal agencies beyond the Department of Interior’s Bureau of Ocean and Energy Management and U.S. Department of Energy are now affecting how the offshore wind industry will operate into the future. This report also discusses how some of the challenges facing offshore wind are being addressed. The health and safety of workers – whether onshore or offshore – are a paramount tenet within the industry. Particular- ly at this time, the offshore industry remains proactive in its response to the coronavirus epidemic, having put in place telework directives, eliminating unnecessary travel, and following government guidelines. As a result of these protocols, Europe has reported minimal disruptions to the supply chains and the 15 offshore wind projects in the U.S., remain in the planning and development stages. It is too soon to know exactly how the global COVID-19 epidemic disruption will affect the U.S. offshore wind in- dustry. Our main concern centers around the economic hardship a long-term shutdown and recession would place on secondary and tertiary U.S. suppliers. It is important to point out, however, that there is almost 10GWs of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Off-Shore Wind Update
    Off-Shore Wind Update – Part 2, rev b By John Benson September 2019 1. Introduction Part 1 of this two-part series reviewed the politics in the states that are currently reasonable candidates for offshore wind projects. A link to Part 1 is below. Part 2 of this series focuses on the off-shore projects, the latest off-shore turbine designs from major manufacturers and planned supporting infrastructure for the major offshore projects. https://www.energycentral.com/c/cp/shore-wind-update-%E2%80%93-part-1 2. Major Projects 2.1. New York The State of New York is the customer for Sunrise Wind and Empire Wind below. See Part 1, Section 2.1 for additional details. 2.1.1. Sunrise Wind Sunrise Wind is an offshore lease site 30 miles east of Montauk Point in Long Island. It will be developed by Danish wind power giant Ørsted in partnership with New England energy company Eversource, and it will provide 880 megawatts to the power grid on Long Island. As part of the agreement, Sunrise Wind will build an operations and maintenance hub in Port Jefferson, Long Island, investing in port infrastructure upgrades and establishing offshore wind training programs. The hub will include dockage for a 250 ft. service operation vessel, a warehouse and office facility. Sunrise Wind will be located adjacent to Ørsted’s South Fork Wind Farm and Revolution Wind projects in federal waters off the northeastern coast of the US. The Sunrise wind project will feature SG 8.0-167 DD offshore wind turbines, which will be supplied by Siemens Gamesa under a conditional contract with the project partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit 5 Resources (Ver. 2) 6 4 14.Xlsx
    EIPC Target 2 - Input Data and Assumptions Exhibit 5 - Resources, Reference Gas Demand Scenario and Reference Gas Demand Scenario Update IESO Capacity (MW) Reference Scenario Reference Update Resource Name 2018 2023 2018 2023 Fuel 1 Fuel 2 Tech Type Zone Name Abitibi Canyon GS #1-5 311.0 311.0 311.0 311.0 WAT HY ON_N Adelaide Wind Energy Centre 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 WND WT ON_W Adelaide Wind Power Project 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 WND WT ON_W Aguasabon #1-2 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 WAT HY ON_N Alexander #1-4 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 WAT HY ON_N Amherst 76.0 76.0 76.0 76.0 WND WT ON_E Andrews GS #1+2+3 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 WAT HY ON_N Armow Wind Project 180.0 180.0 180.0 180.0 WND WT ON_W Arnprior #1-2 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 WAT HY ON_E Atikokan #1 227.0 227.0 201.0 201.0 OT ST ON_N Barrett Chute #1-4 154.0 154.0 154.0 154.0 WAT HY ON_E Beck 1 GS EBUS 507.0 507.0 507.0 507.0 WAT HY ON_W Beck 2 GS #11-26 1499.0 1499.0 1499.0 1499.0 WAT HY ON_W Beck 2 PGS #1-6 122.0 122.0 122.0 122.0 PS PumpStore ON_W Bluewater Wind Energy Centre 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 WND WT ON_W Bornish Wind Energy Centre 73.0 73.0 73.0 73.0 WND WT ON_W Bow Lake Phase 1 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 WND WT ON_N Bow Lake Phase 2 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 WND WT ON_N Bramalea GS #13 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 NG SCCT ON_C Bramalea GS #2 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 NG SCCT ON_C Brighton Beach Generating Station CCCT 575.0 575.0 575.0 575.0 NG CCCT ON_W Bruce A #1 781.0 781.0 781.0 781.0 UR ST ON_W Bruce A #2 750.0 750.0 750.0 750.0 UR ST ON_W Bruce A #3 750.0 750.0 750.0 750.0 UR ST ON_W Bruce A #4 0.0 760.0 0.0 760.0 UR ST
    [Show full text]
  • Skipjack Wind Farm Faqs
    Skipjack Wind Farm FAQs How many offshore wind projects are planned off Maryland’s coast? Two. Maryland’s Public Service Commission (MD PSC) awarded Offshore Renewable Energy Credits (ORECs) to two separate companies, U.S. Wind, Inc., and Ørsted U.S. Offshore Wind, in May 2017 under docket 9431. What is the Skipjack Wind Farm? The Skipjack Wind Farm is the smaller of the two offshore wind farms off the coast of Maryland. It is being developed by Ørsted U.S. Offshore Wind, America’s leading offshore wind company. Ørsted U.S. Offshore Wind also developed America’s first offshore wind farm, the Block Island Wind Farm off the coast of Block Island, RI. Once operational, the Skipjack Wind Farm will generate enough energy to power 35,000 homes. How far from the Maryland coast is the Skipjack Wind Farm? The Skipjack Wind Farm will be located over 19 miles from the Maryland-Delaware border and 26 miles from the Ocean City pier. What about the Delaware coast? At its closest distance, the Skipjack Wind Farm will be approximately 17 miles off the Delaware shore. Why is it located off the Maryland-Delaware coast? After significant public and stakeholder input, these locations (called “Wind Energy Areas”) were chosen by the Federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM). There are other Wind Energy Areas along the northeast coast. Ørsted U.S. Offshore Wind acquired the lease from the previous leaseholder in 2015. Have you determined the size of the Skipjack Wind Farm turbines? Yes. Subject to final agreed and signed contract and all required project approvals, Ørsted will deploy the GE Haliade-X 12MW wind turbines for the Skipjack Wind Farm.
    [Show full text]
  • Vineyard Wind, South Fork, Bay State Wind and Skipjack) • 7 Additional Projects Expected Within Next 12 Months
    Michelle Bachman, NEFMC staff Heather Deese, Consultant to NEFMC NEFMC Meeting June 11, 2019 South Portland, ME Update topics 1. Overall scope and scale of wind energy development 2. Individual wind energy project updates 3. Regional research updates 4. Wind energy technology, infrastructure & workforce development 5. Oil & gas – 5-year plan June 11, 2019 2 1. Scale and scope • Leasing • 15 commercial wind energy leases in the Atlantic • Upcoming lease sale in New York • Site Assessment Plans (SAP) • 7 approved (MA, RI, VA, MD, MA, NJ, NY) • Construction And Operations Plans (COP) • 4 project in progress (Vineyard Wind, South Fork, Bay State Wind and Skipjack) • 7 additional projects expected within next 12 months June 11, 2019 Year Project Company 2020 Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind 2021 Vineyard Wind 2022 South Fork 2022 Ocean Wind 2022 Bay State Wind 2022 U.S. Wind (MD) 2023 Revolution Wind 2023 Skipjack Windfarm 2025 Dominion Commercial Lease 2025 Empire Wind 2026 EDF Renewables 2027 Kitty Hawk June 11, 2019 … And likely more coming The current list of Atlantic coast projects: extends only to 2027 does not include all current leases (more projects can be developed on existing leases) does not include new leases planned (NY Bight, Carolinas); others (“Path Forward”) does not include areas where moored (floating) technology would be used June 11, 2019 5 State procurement & goals Expect announcements of winning bids for NY - 800 MW (or more) in early June, State Goals NJ - 1,100 MW summer 2019. MA 3,200 MA – May 2019 RFP for 800 RI 1,000 MW. Expect selection fall CT 2,300* (300 current) 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Impact of U.S. Offshore Wind Power
    The Economic Impact of U.S. Offshore Wind Power U.S. Offshore Wind Poised Offshore wind delivers jobs and economic growth to Strengthen the American The offshore wind industry is poised for exponential growth in the United States. Economy and Energy Market projections anticipate up to 30,000 megawatts (MW) of offshore wind capacity will be operational by 2030, representing as much as $57 billion of investment in the Independence U.S. economy. Besides delivering clean, affordable, and reliable power to families and The United States is on the cusp of businesses, U.S. offshore wind will also contribute a variety of economic benefits to a rare generational opportunity— our economy. This includes supporting up to 83,000 jobs and driving $25 billion in annual economic output by 2030, while also delivering investment in critical coastal we have the chance to build an infrastructure. entirely new domestic industry Offshore wind is poised for growth in the form of offshore wind. The Department of Interior’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) has issued Harnessing the winds off our 15 active commercial leases to date for the development of offshore wind projects in coasts will allow us to power many federal waters. These lease areas can support over 26 gigawatts (GW) of offshore wind. of the country’s largest population States along the East Coast are driving demand for offshore wind. Connecticut, centers with competitively priced Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Virginia have established targets to procure clean energy while establishing a total of 25,400 MW of offshore wind by at least 2035.
    [Show full text]
  • Aileen Kenney TESTIMONY AK-1 Q. Please State Your Name, Employer, Business Address and Current Position. 1 A. My Name Is Aileen
    Aileen Kenney 1 Q. Please state your name, employer, business address and current position. 2 A. My name is Aileen Kenney. I am a Senior Vice President of Development with Deepwater 3 Wind, LLC. My business address is 56 Exchange Terrace Suite 300, Providence Rhode Island 4 02903. 5 6 Q. On whose behalf are you testifying? 7 A. I am testifying on behalf of Deepwater Wind South Fork, LLC. Deepwater Wind South Fork, 8 LLC is proposing to construct the South Fork Export Cable, an electrical energy export cable, 9 that will interconnect the South Fork Wind Farm, an offshore wind energy facility, with the 10 existing Long Island Power Authority transmission system located in the Town of East Hampton 11 on Long Island, New York. The of the 138-kilovolt alternating current South Fork Export Cable 12 travels offshore from the South Fork Wind Farm, traversing both federal waters and New York 13 State territorial waters to the onshore landing site, and continues underground to its terminus at 14 the proposed interconnection facility. 15 16 Q. Please summarize your education and professional background. 17 A. I received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Environmental Science and Policy from Clark 18 University in 1998. I received a Master of Arts degree in Environmental Science and Policy from 19 Clark University in 1999. I have over 15 years of experience in the renewable energy industry, 20 specifically managing environmental permitting, planning, and project development. 21 22 Q. Does your curriculum vitae, which is attached to this prefiled testimony, fairly and accurately 23 represent your experience with respect to environmental permitting and project development? 24 A.
    [Show full text]