Geomorphological and Meteorological Control of Estuarine Processes: a Three-Dimensional Modeling Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geomorphological and Meteorological Control of Estuarine Processes: a Three-Dimensional Modeling Analysis Geomorphological and Meteorological Control of Estuarine Processes: A Three-Dimensional Modeling Analysis Quamrul Ahsan, P.E., M.ASCE1; Alan F. Blumberg, M.ASCE2; Andrew J. Thuman, P.E., M.ASCE3; and Thomas W. Gallagher, P.E., M.ASCE4 Abstract: The proper timing, duration, and direction of wind events interacting with the geometry of an estuarine system can control the intensity of stratification. A three-dimensional, time-dependent hydrodynamic model was used to examine this process. Intense mixing is closely tied with wind-generated internal velocity shear. A south wind generates up-estuary directed surface currents, which eventually leads to downwelling movements of water. This downwelling process in the upper bay region accelerates the bottom current in a down-estuary direction. A vertical instability occurs, especially in the upper bay region, due to the generation of shear across the pycnocline, causing mixing sufficient to destratify the entire water column. On the other hand, strong stratification occurs when a north wind advects fresher upper bay surface water into the lower bay. A downwelling movement of water is produced, which in turn drives bottom saline water in the up-estuary direction. DOI: 10.1061/͑ASCE͒0733-9429͑2005͒131:4͑259͒ CE Database subject headings: Three-dimensional models; Hydrodynamics; Estuaries; Wind; Geometry; Stratification. Introduction the tidal excursion to the distance between major bathymetric and shoreline features. They concluded that in estuaries where the Stratification in an estuarine environment is of significant impor- typical spacing of topographic features is less than the tidal ex- tance to phytoplankton populations, nutrient recycling, and dis- cursion, tidal dispersion may contribute significantly to the mix- solved oxygen distributions since they are strongly controlled by ing processes. In Chesapeake Bay, Blumberg and Goodrich the vertical structure of the water column. In a fully stratified ͑1990͒ have found that wind-driven internal shear is a more ef- estuarine system, such as Pensacola Bay, Fla., the presence of a fective mechanism of inducing destratification than turbulence strong pycnocline forms a barrier to the downward transport of generated at the surface. oxygen; this event is a dominant influence in causing hypoxia in The advective effects of wind forcing have been examined in the bottom layer. The amount of stratification also controls the many estuarine systems. Observations of local wind forcing in region’s physical characteristics, such as temperature, salinity, estuaries, especially in Chesapeake Bay, have shown that wind- and velocity structure. induced currents are typically larger than density-driven gravita- Astronomical tides have long been considered the major tional currents and can be of the same order as the tidal currents, source of mixing energy for the breakdown of stratification. especially during wind events ͑Goodrich 1985͒. Weisberg ͑1976͒ Stratification and destratification as a result of neap-spring tidal has found that wind-induced velocity fluctuations at a time scale mixing have been reported by Ruzecki and Evans ͑1985͒ in the between the steady-state gravitational circulation and tidal oscil- York River estuary. Geyer and Signell ͑1992͒ have argued that the lations are of equal or greater importance to the circulation phys- effectiveness of tidal dispersion depends on the relative scale of ics. Large variations in the salinity distributions associated with wind-driven velocity fluctuations were also observed in Chesa- 1PhD, Sr. Project Manager, HydroQual, Inc., 1200 McArthur Blvd., peake Bay by Wang ͑1979͒. Wang ͑1979͒ clearly demonstrated Mahwah, NJ 07430 ͑corresponding author͒. E-mail: qahsan@ that wind forcing has a twofold effect on the water column, pro- hydroqual.com 2 ducing wind-induced mixing and causing advective currents. PhD, George Meade Bond Professor of Ocean Engineering, Dept. of In general, wind-induced mixing tends to raise the potential Civil, Environmental and Ocean Engineering, Stevens Institute of energy of a water column by redistributing the salinity gradient Technology, Castle Point on Hudson, Hoboken, NJ 07030 and Consultant, HydroQual, Inc., 1200 McArthur Blvd, Mahwah, NJ 07430. over depth, thereby altering the horizontal pressure gradient. It is E-mail: [email protected] this gradient which essentially generates the gravitational flow. 3Associate, HydroQual, Inc., 1200 McArthur Blvd., Mahwah, NJ Several studies have demonstrated that a depth-dependent re- 07430. E-mail: [email protected] sponse to local wind forcing is a very effective mechanism in 4Principal Engineer, HydroQual, Inc., 1200 McArthur Blvd., maintaining stratification as well as leading to destratification. Mahwah, NJ 07430. E-mail: [email protected] Among these studies, work in Narragansett Bay by Weisberg Note. Discussion open until September 1, 2005. Separate discussions ͑1976͒ and in Chesapeake Bay by Wang ͑1979͒, Grano and Prit- must be submitted for individual papers. To extend the closing date by chard ͑1982͒, Goodrich ͑1985͒, Goodrich et al. ͑1987͒, and Blum- one month, a written request must be filed with the ASCE Managing ͑ ͒ Editor. The manuscript for this paper was submitted for review and pos- berg and Goodrich 1990 , and in Mobile Bay, by Noble et al. ͑ ͒ ͑ ͒ sible publication on January 5, 2004; approved on July 30, 2004. This 1996 and Schroeder et al. 1990 are notable. They suggest that paper is part of the Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 4, a down-estuary wind, which is frictionally coupled with the sur- April 1, 2005. ©ASCE, ISSN 0733-9429/2005/4-259–272/$25.00. face currents, tends to drive relatively fresh surface water in the JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING © ASCE / APRIL 2005 / 259 Fig. 1. Geographic and bathymetric features of Pensacola Bay system. Field observation stations are marked; these data were used for model calibration purposes seaward direction, and subsequently a compensating more-saline water level measurements. Favorable comparison of the model- bottom water movement can occur in the up-estuary direction. computed salinity distribution against the observed data provides This kind of response to the wind is more pronounced both in a firm basis for believing that the model-computed circulation is space and time if the coastline of the estuary changes direction an accurate representation of the bay circulation. near its confluence with the ocean, for example, the Gulf Breeze Peninsula in Pensacola Bay ͑Fig. 1͒. On the other hand, destrati- fication may occur due to an up-estuary wind. Goodrich ͑1985͒ Physical Characteristics of Pensacola Bay suggested that this depth-dependent response to wind is an effec- tive mechanism for generating vertical shear which, in turn, pro- duces significant vertical mixing to destratify the entire water The general morphological features of the Pensacola Bay system ͑ ͒ ͑ column. Fig. 1 are well documented USDI, FWPCA 1970; Wolfe et al. ͒ A three-dimensional hydrodynamic model was used to simu- 1988; NOAA 1993 . The present hydrodynamic study focuses on late the physics of the bay in response to various forcing mecha- the processes governing stratification and destratification in nisms, including tides, fresh water inflow, and atmospheric and Pensacola Bay and their connection in controlling water quality meteorological conditions. The modeling analysis was directed at processes such as the vertical dissolved oxygen distribution and examining both the mechanism of mixing and the temporal and phytoplankton growth. These physical processes are dependent on spatial distribution of salinity in the bay. Model calibration was the geomorphology, freshwater discharge, tidal energy dissipa- performed through comparison of the model results against ob- tion, and atmospheric and meteorological conditions in the sys- served data. The observed data include salinity, temperature, and tem. 260 / JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING © ASCE / APRIL 2005 The morphology tends to divide the entire study area in to two in the Blackwater Bay and East Bay areas, where modeling re- major estuarine systems; the Pensacola-Escambia Bay and East sults are of lesser interest. This variable grid spacing allows for Bay-Blackwater Bay systems. Unlike most estuarine systems, this the design of computationally efficient and time-effective model- estuary is physically separated from the coastal water ͑Gulf of ing system. Mexico͒ by a strip of land mass, the Gulf Breeze Peninsula ͑Fig. The modeling framework is configured such that it can accom- 1͒. The system however is dynamically connected to the Gulf of modate time dependent river flows, and water level, temperature, Mexico through the Pensacola Inlet. The Gulf Breeze Peninsula, and salinity along its open coastal boundaries and wind stress on which provides a physical barrier between these two systems, the water surface. River flows along with their temperature and estuary. The degree of stratification and destratification in the bay, salinity are used for Escambia, Blackwater, Yellow and East Bay accentuated by the oppositely directed near surface and near bot- Rivers, and Mulatto Bayou and Bayou Texar ͑see Fig. 1 for geo- tom currents, is substantially affected by the presence of the Gulf graphic locations of these rivers͒. Freshwater flows are obtained Breeze Peninsula. A detailed analysis of this process is provided from USGS maintained gages. The Pensacola Bay Bridge area is in this paper. where we have placed our open boundary. Through the specifica- The
Recommended publications
  • Florida Audubon Naturalist Summer 2021
    Naturalist Summer 2021 Female Snail Kite. Photo: Nancy Elwood Heidi McCree, Board Chair 2021 Florida Audubon What a privilege to serve as the newly-elected Chair of the Society Leadership Audubon Florida Board. It is an honor to be associated with Audubon Florida’s work and together, we will continue to Executive Director address the important issues and achieve our mission to protect Julie Wraithmell birds and the places they need. We send a huge thank you to our outgoing Chair, Jud Laird, for his amazing work and Board of Directors leadership — the birds are better off because of your efforts! Summer is here! Locals and visitors alike enjoy sun, the beach, and Florida’s amazing Chair waterways. Our beaches are alive with nesting sea and shorebirds, and across the Heidi McCree Everglades we are wrapping up a busy wading bird breeding season. At the Center Vice-Chair for Birds of Prey, more than 200 raptor chicks crossed our threshold — and we Carol Colman Timmis released more than half back to the wild. As Audubon Florida’s newest Board Chair, I see the nesting season as a time to celebrate the resilience of birds, while looking Treasurer forward to how we can protect them into the migration season and beyond. We Scott Taylor will work with state agencies to make sure the high levels of conservation funding Secretary turn into real wins for both wildlife and communities (pg. 8). We will forge new Lida Rodriguez-Taseff partnerships to protect Lake Okeechobee and the Snail Kites that nest there (pg. 14).
    [Show full text]
  • Pensacola Bay Bridge
    Florida Department of Transportation RICK SCOTT 1074 Highway 90 ANANTH PRASAD, P.E. GOVERNOR Chipley, Florida 32428 SECRETARY July 18, 2011 Ms. Lauren P. Milligan Florida State Clearinghouse Department of Environmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Blvd., Mail Station 47 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 RE: Advance Notification Pensacola Bay Bridge Replacement PD&E Study ETDM #: 13248 From: 17th Avenue in Pensacola to Baybridge Drive in Gulf Breeze Federal Aid Project Number: 4221 078 P Financial Project ID Number: 409334-1-22-02 Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties, Florida Dear Ms. Milligan: We are sending this Advance Notification (AN) Package to your office for distribution to State agencies that conduct Federal consistency reviews (consistency reviewers) in accordance with the Coastal Zone Management Act and Presidential Executive Order 12372. We are also distributing the AN Package to local and Federal agencies. Although we will request specific comments during the permitting process, we are asking that permitting and permit reviewing agencies (consistency reviewers) review the attached information and provide us with their comments. This is a Federal-aid action and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), in consultation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), will determine what type of environmental documentation will be necessary. The determination will be based upon in-house environmental evaluations and comments from other agencies. Please provide a consistency review for this project in accordance with the State’s Coastal Zone Management Program. www.dot.state.fl.us In addition, please review the project’s consistency, to the maximum extent feasible, with the approved Comprehensive Plan of the local government to comply with Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Pensacola Bay System EPA Report
    EPA/600/R-16/169 | August 2016 | www.epa.gov/research Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation Office of Research and Development 1 EPA/600/R-16/169 August 2016 Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation by Michael A. Lewis Gulf Ecology Division National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Gulf Breeze, FL 32561 J. Taylor Kirschenfeld Water Quality and Land Management Division Escambia County Pensacola, FL 32503 Traci Goodhart West Florida Regional Planning Council Pensacola, FL 32514 National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gulf Breeze, FL. 32561 i Notice The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through its Office of Research and Development (ORD) funded and collaborated in the research described herein with representatives from Escambia County’s Water Quality and Land Management Division and the West Florida Regional Planning Council. It has been subjected to the Agency’s peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. This is a contribution to the EPA ORD Sustainable and Healthy Communities Research Program. The appropriate citation for this report is: Lewis, Michael, J. Taylor Kirschenfeld, and Traci Goodheart. Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf Breeze, FL, EPA/600/R-16/169, 2016. ii Foreword This report supports EPA’s Sustainable and Healthy Communities Research Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 COLA
    Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 COL Application Part 2 — FSAR SUBSECTION 2.4.1: HYDROLOGIC DESCRIPTION TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.4 HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING ..................................................................2.4.1-1 2.4.1 HYDROLOGIC DESCRIPTION ............................................................2.4.1-1 2.4.1.1 Site and Facilities .....................................................................2.4.1-1 2.4.1.2 Hydrosphere .............................................................................2.4.1-3 2.4.1.3 References .............................................................................2.4.1-12 2.4.1-i Revision 6 Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 COL Application Part 2 — FSAR SUBSECTION 2.4.1 LIST OF TABLES Number Title 2.4.1-201 East Miami-Dade County Drainage Subbasin Areas and Outfall Structures 2.4.1-202 Summary of Data Records for Gage Stations at S-197, S-20, S-21A, and S-21 Flow Control Structures 2.4.1-203 Monthly Mean Flows at the Canal C-111 Structure S-197 2.4.1-204 Monthly Mean Water Level at the Canal C-111 Structure S-197 (Headwater) 2.4.1-205 Monthly Mean Flows in the Canal L-31E at Structure S-20 2.4.1-206 Monthly Mean Water Levels in the Canal L-31E at Structure S-20 (Headwaters) 2.4.1-207 Monthly Mean Flows in the Princeton Canal at Structure S-21A 2.4.1-208 Monthly Mean Water Levels in the Princeton Canal at Structure S-21A (Headwaters) 2.4.1-209 Monthly Mean Flows in the Black Creek Canal at Structure S-21 2.4.1-210 Monthly Mean Water Levels in the Black Creek Canal at Structure S-21 2.4.1-211 NOAA
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Survey of Escambia County, Florida
    United States In cooperation with Department of the University of Florida, Agriculture Institute of Food and Soil Survey of Agricultural Sciences, Natural Agricultural Experiment Escambia County, Resources Stations, and Soil and Water Conservation Science Department; and the Service Florida Department of Florida Agriculture and Consumer Services How To Use This Soil Survey General Soil Map The general soil map, which is a color map, shows the survey area divided into groups of associated soils called general soil map units. This map is useful in planning the use and management of large areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the map, identify the name of the map unit in the area on the color-coded map legend, then refer to the section General Soil Map Units for a general description of the soils in your area. Detailed Soil Maps The detailed soil maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the Index to Map Sheets. Note the number of the map sheet and turn to that sheet. Locate your area of interest on the map sheet. Note the map unit symbols that are in that area. Turn to the Contents, which lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. The Contents shows which table has data on a specific land use for each detailed soil map unit. Also see the Contents for sections of this publication that may address your specific needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulf of Mexico Estuary Program Restoration Council (EPA RESTORE 003 008 Cat1)
    Gulf Coast Gulf-wide Foundational Investment Ecosystem Gulf of Mexico Estuary Program Restoration Council (EPA_RESTORE_003_008_Cat1) Project Name: Gulf of Mexico Estuary Program – Planning Cost: Category 1: $2,200,000 Responsible Council Member: Environmental Protection Agency Partnering Council Member: State of Florida Project Details: This project proposes to develop and stand-up a place-based estuary program encompassing one or more of the following bays in Florida’s northwest panhandle region: Perdido Bay, Pensacola Bay, Escambia Bay, Choctawhatchee Bay, St. Andrews Bay and Apalachicola Bay. Activities: The key components of the project include establishing the host organization and hiring of key staff, developing Management and Technical committees, determining stressors and then developing and approving a Comprehensive Plan. Although this Estuary Program would be modeled after the structure and operation of National Estuary Programs (NEP) it would not be a designated NEP. This project would serve as a pilot project for the Council to consider expanding Gulf-wide when future funds become available. Environmental Benefits: If the estuary program being planned by this activity were implemented in the future, projects undertaken would directly support goals and outcomes focusing on restoring water quality, while also addressing restoration and conservation of habitat, replenishing and protecting living coastal and marine resources, enhancing community resilience and revitalizing the coastal economy. Specific actions would likely include,
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrass Integrated Mapping and Monitoring for the State of Florida Mapping and Monitoring Report No. 1
    Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Seagrass Integrated Mapping and Monitoring for the State of Florida Mapping and Monitoring Report No. 1 Edited by Laura A. Yarbro and Paul R. Carlson Jr. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute St. Petersburg, Florida March 2011 Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Table of Contents Authors, Contributors, and SIMM Team Members .................................................................. 3 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................... 4 Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 7 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 31 How this report was put together ........................................................................................... 36 Chapter Reports ...................................................................................................................... 41 Perdido Bay ........................................................................................................................... 41 Pensacola Bay .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrass Status and Trends in the Northern Gulf of Mexico: 1940–2002
    Seagrass Status and Trends in the Northern Gulf of Mexico: 1940–2002 Edited by L. Handley,1 D. Altsman,2 and R. DeMay3 Abstract Introduction Over the past century, seagrass habitats from the The Gulf of Mexico provides a wide array of valuable bays of Texas to the gulf shores of Florida have decreased. natural resources to the nations that border its shores. As Seagrass beds, which are highly dependent on water quality the value of the gulf coastal environment continues to be and clarity for survival, are home to a multitude of aquatic recognized, it becomes increasingly important to invest in the plants and animals and a source of economic activity through conservation of those resources. Reductions in both abundance commercial and recreational fishing and ecotourism. The U.S. and diversity of various organisms and habitats emphasize a Environmental Protection Agency’s Gulf of Mexico Program critical need to protect these natural assets, many of which (GMP) and its partners have made a commitment to restore, serve important ecological functions. In response to increasing enhance, and protect this important ecosystem. As seagrass trends in habitat degradation, several organizations and habitats decrease, the need for information on the causes and institutions have begun to act together with local residents to effects of seagrass loss, current mapping information, and address these issues. One such effort, facilitated by the U.S. education on the importance of seagrassess becomes greater. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Gulf of Mexico This report is the initial effort of the GMP’s research and Program, will integrate the efforts of a wide range of scientific restoration plan for seagrasses.
    [Show full text]
  • 12. Gulf Islands National Seashore
    The massive fort and surrounding trails cuckoos and hairy woodpeckers along offer a great vantage point for viewing the Chain of Lakes Trail. The Hutton sentinel flycatchers, gray kingbirds, Unit nearby is worth a stop to hear Tennessee, Cape May and magnolia the song of Bachman’s sparrows, and warblers. Fallouts can be seen in April the Three Notch Road site is perfect as migrants reach land for the first time. for sighting a red-headed woodpecker. Photo by David Moynahan 8 a.m. to sunset. Far western end of Free binoculars and field guides Fort Pickens Rd. (850) 934-2600, nps. are available. Dawn to dusk. 7720 org/guis Deaton Bridge Rd., (850) 983-5363, floridastateparks.org 12. Gulf Islands National Feathery Finds Seashore: Naval Osprey: Known as Florida’s fishing Live Oaks. The eagles, osprey have a distinct M wing national park’s shape and make their habitat near visitor center on brackish estuaries where they can scan Santa Rosa Sound the surface for fish. Osprey mate for is also a prime spot life – birds of a feather really do stay for sighting goldeneye, scaup, ducks, together! black-and-white warblers. 8 a.m. to sunset. 1801 Gulf Breeze Pkwy., (850) Brown Pelican: A symbol 934-2600, nps.org/guis of the Gulf Coast, the brown pelican is making A 1.5-mile loop trail 13. Garcon Point. a comeback. These runs through live oaks and picturesque water birds weigh 6-7 wetland. Wet prairie sparrows such as pounds and have a Henslow’s and LeConte’s can be seen 7-foot wingspan.
    [Show full text]
  • Escambia County Design Standards Manual
    Escambia County Design Standards Manual LEGEND Blue Highlight Federally Required Red Highlight State Required - Green Highlight Previously Adopted Ordinances *(concepts/standards unchanged) Yellow Highlight Director’s Recommendations *The overall concept was not changed however revisions were made to the language for clarity. In addition in some cases the process was streamlined. 11/2014 1 Design Standards Manual 2 3 4 Chapter 1, Engineering 5 6 Article 1 Stormwater 7 8 Sec. 1-1 Stormwater Management Systems 9 Sec. 1-1.1 Stormwater Quality (treatment) 10 Sec. 1-1.2 Stormwater Quantity (attenuations) 11 Sec. 1-1.3 Stormwater Ponds and Impoundments 12 Sec. 1-1.4 Conveyance Systems 13 Sec. 1-1.5 Exemptions 14 Sec. 1-1.6 Other Agency Approvals 15 16 Sec. 1-2 Stormwater Management Plans 17 Sec. 1-2.1 Methods 18 Sec. 1-2.2 Content 19 20 Article 2 Transportation 21 22 Sec. 2-1 Roadway Design 23 Sec. 2-1.1 Minimum Right-of-way widths 24 Sec. 2-1.2 Minimum pavement widths 25 Sec. 2-1.3 Intersections 26 Sec. 2-1.4 Slopes 27 Sec. 2-1.5 Roadway Elevations 28 Sec. 2-1.6 Street Layout 29 Sec. 2-1.7 Traffic Control Devices 30 31 Sec. 2-2 Access Management 32 Sec. 2-2.1 Access Location 33 Sec. 2-2.2 Pedestrian Access 34 Sec. 2-2.3 Traffic Control 35 Sec. 2-2.4 Modification of Existing access 36 Sec.2-2.5 internal Site Access Design 37 Sec. 2-2.6 Commercial Traffic in Residential Areas 38 39 Article 3 Parking 40 41 Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Perdido River and Bay Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan
    Perdido River and Bay Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan November 2017 Program Development Series 17-07 Northwest Florida Water Management District Perdido River and Bay Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan November 2017 Program Development Series 17-07 NORTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD George Roberts Jerry Pate John Alter Chair, Panama City Vice Chair, Pensacola Secretary-Treasurer, Malone Gus Andrews Jon Costello Marc Dunbar DeFuniak Springs Tallahassee Tallahassee Ted Everett Nick Patronis Bo Spring Chipley Panama City Beach Port St. Joe Brett J. Cyphers Executive Director Headquarters 81 Water Management Drive Havana, Florida 32333-4712 (850) 539-5999 Crestview Econfina Milton 180 E. Redstone Avenue 6418 E. Highway 20 5453 Davisson Road Crestview, Florida 32539 Youngstown, FL 32466 Milton, FL 32583 (850) 683-5044 (850) 722-9919 (850) 626-3101 Perdido River and Bay SWIM Plan Northwest Florida Water Management District Acknowledgements This document was developed by the Northwest Florida Water Management District under the auspices of the Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Program and in accordance with sections 373.451-459, Florida Statutes. The plan update was prepared under the supervision and oversight of Brett Cyphers, Executive Director and Carlos Herd, Director, Division of Resource Management. Funding support was provided by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation’s Gulf Environmental Benefit Fund. The assistance and support of the NFWF is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would like to especially recognize members of the public, as well as agency reviewers and staff from the District and from the Ecology and Environment, Inc., team that contributed to the development of this plan.
    [Show full text]
  • FCMP Program Guide
    FLORIDA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM GUIDE A GUIDE TO THE FEDERALLY APPROVED FLORIDA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Updated August 19th, 2020 Office of Resilience and Coastal Protection Department of Environmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Blvd., MS 235 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 https://floridadep.gov/rcp/fcmp TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................3 II. THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT ..........................................4 III. THE FLORIDA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM .....................6 PROGRAM BOUNDARIES..........................................................................................................7 FEDERAL CONSISTENCY .........................................................................................................9 Partner Agencies ............................................................................................................... 11 Federal Consistency Enforceable Policies .............................................................,.......... 13 Types of Federal Actions Reviewed ................................................................................. 15 a) Federal Agency Activities………………………..………….….………………..15 b) Federal Assistance to State and Local Governments…………………………….15 c) Outer Continental Shelf Activities….……...…………..………...........................15 d) Federal License or Permit Activities……………………………………..……....17 AREAS OF SPECIAL MANAGEMENT................................................................................23
    [Show full text]