Beryl Resources of New Hampshire

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Beryl Resources of New Hampshire Beryl Resources of New Hampshire GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 353 Prepared on behalf of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission^ and in part in cooperation with the New Hampshire State Planning and Development Commission Beryl Resources of New Hampshire By JAMES J. PAGE and DAVID M. LARRABEE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 353 Prepared on behalf of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission^ and in part in cooperation with the New Hampshire State Planning and Development Commission UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Surrey Library has cataloged this publication as follows: Page, James Jeffers, 192ft- Beryl resources of New Hampshire, by James J. Page and David M. Larrabee. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1961. iii, 49 p. maps (part col., part in pocket) tables. 31 cm. (U.S. Geological Survey. Professional paper 353) Prepared on behalf of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, and in part in cooperation with the New Hampshire State Planning and Development Commission. Bibliography: p. 48-49. (Continued on next card) Page, James Jeffers, 1920- Beryl resources of New Hampshire. 1961. (Card 2) 1. Beryl. 2. Pegmatites. 3. Mines and mineral resources New Hampshire. I. Larrabee, David Marcel, 1909- joint author. II. New Hampshire. State Planning and Development Commission. III. Title. (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract_ _ ___----__-___---___-___________. 1 Description of pegmatites Continued Introduction _________.-______-.___-_-______. 1 Raymond district--_________________ 19 Beryl mining, production, and uses__________ 2 General geology.__________-_-_. 21 Internal structure and mineralogy of pegmatites . 3 Minor districts________-_______--_-. 43 Methods used in estimating resources._________ 3 Millard Chandler mine.____--__. 43 Beryl resources____-______----_-_________-__- 3 Parker Mountain mine._________ 44 Description of pegmatites___________________ 10 Reconnaissance of other areas.____-_. 45 Grafton district_______________________ 10 Alton quadrangle_________-____. 45 Palermo No. 1 mine________________ 10 Gorham quadrangle._____._-___. 45 Keene district.__________________________ 13 Mount Pawtuckaway quadrangle. 46 Beryl Mountain mine.-__-________--_ 13 Mount Washington quadrangle._. 47 Chickering mine.____________________ 14 Plymouth quadrangle_____-_-__. 48 Raymond region.________________________ 16 Literature cited______________________ 48 Corson mine_______----________----_ 16 McGall mine_________-----_________- 17 McMullen prospect._________________ 18 Vatcher prospect_.-__--________---__ 18 ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates are in pocket] PLATE 1. Geologic map and sections of the Palermo No. 1 mine, Groton, Grafton County, N.H. 2. Geologic map and sections of the Beryl Mountain mine, Acworth, Sullivan County, N.H. 3. Geologic map and section of the Chickering mine, Walpole, Cheshire County, N.H. 4. Geologic map of the Corson mine, Nottingham, Rockingham County, N.H. 5. Geologic map of the McGall mine, Raymond, Rockingham County, N.H. 6. Geologic map and section of the Vatcher prospect, Raymond, Rockingham County, N.H. 7. Geologic map and sections of the Chandler mine (pegmatite 7), Raymond, Rockingham County, l\.fl. 8. Geologic map and section of the Smith No. 1 mine (pegmatites 9 and 10), Raymond, Rockingham County, N.H. 9. Geologic map of pegmatite 37, Raymond, Rockingham County, N.H. 10. Geologic map of the Smith No. 3 prospect (pegmatite 49), Raymond, Rockingham County, N.H. 11. Geologic map of the Blake mine (Mafera mine or pegmatite 56), Raymond, Rockingham County, N.H. 12. Geologic map and sections of the Welch mine (pegmatite 62), Raymond, Rockingham County, N.H. 13. Geologic map of pegmatites 69, 70, 71, 72, and 73, Raymond, Rockingham County, N.H. 14. Geologic map and section of the Hurley prospect (pegmatites 84, 85, and 86), Raymond, Rockingham County, N.H. 15. Geologic map and section of the Millard Chandler mine, Chatham, Carroll County, N.H. 16. Geologic map and generalized section of the Parker Mountain mine, Strafford, Strafford County, N.H. Page FIGURE 1. Index map showing locations of principal pegmatites described in this report________________________________ 1 2. Sketch map of workings at the Palermo mine, Groton, Grafton County, N.H _____________________________ 10 3. Geologic map of the Raymond district, Rockingham County, N.H., showing locations of pegmatite exposures studied. 20 m TABLES Page TABLE 1. Beryl in New Hampshire pegmatites.__________._________ ___________.-__------_-_---------__-_ 4 2. Size of pegmatites, and distribution of minerals therein, Raymond district, N.H____________.____---_-----_--- 22 3. Mineral assemblages in zoned pegmatites of the Raymond district, Rockingham County, N.H_.___-.____.._ 24 IV BERYL RESOURCES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE By JAMES J. PAGE and DAVID M. LARRABEE ABSTRACT In the course of this study, more than 200 pegmatites were v v^/ examined either in reconnaissance fashion or in detail, and / the most important actual or potential sources of beryl were LIST OF MINES ) 45° \. Millard Chandler mine J carefully studied. These included the Palermo No. 1, Beryl 1 2. Palermo No. 1 mine, Grafton district v Mountain, Blake, Chickering, Smith No. 1, Corson, McGall, 3. Parker Mountain mine \ J X Chandler, Millard Chandler, Welch, and Parker Mountain 4. Corson mine 1 5. Vatcher prospect ' mines, and the Vatcher, Hurley, and Smith No. 3 prospects. 6. Raymond pegmatite district / The pegmatites of the Raymond district received special at­ 7. Chickering mine, Keene district \ COOS tention, for these previously have received little study and there 8. Beryl Mountain mine, Keene district > was a need for knowledge of any beryl resources present. These 0 10 20 30 MILES / resources are of no great magnitude, but resources of milling- grade feldspar are of interest. The Palermo No. 1 and Beryl * Xu Mountain pegmatites were restudied following development K r~ after World War II; these pegmatites are of special interest as ( 1 both have been known for many years as important sources of i \\/ beryl. 44° __ / \ \ GRAFTON F 1 The relation of beryl to other minerals of the zones, the BeO f 1 / content of the beryl, where determined, and the grade of the \ CARROLL ore are indicated in the report and in tables 1 to 3. Some of these data were obtained by the U.S. Geological Survey during World War II, but much new and more detailed information has resulted from this study. The total estimated resources of beryl in New Hampshire are 1,780 tons, of which about 1,200 tons are probably in crystals y / ( MERRIMACK ,- 3 at least 1 inch in diameter, and therefore hand-cobbable at 1957 //X\ prices. Most of this beryl is so scattered throughout the peg­ matites that it represents less than 0.10 percent of the con­ i._A taining rock, and it is recoverable only as a byproduct from ~^ feldspar and mica mining activities. Large deposits containing /' CHESHIREl HILLSBORO fine-grained, nearly indistinguishable white beryl are unknown in the State, but there has been little if any attempt to search for them. In 1957, any such resources would be classed as "potential ore," but could be of great significance in the future. Search for such ore, and research on beneficiation methods, are FIGURE 1. Index map showing locations of principal pegmatites de­ recommended. scribed in this report. INTRODUCTION formation of Devonian age. This formation consists Beryl occurs sparingly in many pegmatites scattered chiefly of mica-quartz or quartz-mica schist, in places throughout the southern two-thirds of New Hamp­ containing appreciable amounts of sillimanite, actino- shire. The deposits of most economic importance are lite, or andalusite. Some parts are quartzitic, conglom­ in the Grafton and Keene districts (fig. 1) in the west- eratic, or include lime-silicate rocks. Relations of the central and southwestern parts of the State, respec­ pegmatites to wallrocks and to major structures have tively. The Raymond district (figs. 1 and 3) in the been described by Cameron (Cameron and others, 1954, southeastern part of the State may be the third most p. 15-19,22-24). important, although it has yielded little beryl to 1957. The pegmatite deposits of New Hampshire have been Although the pegmatites occur in schists, gneisses, investigated by members of the U.S. Geological Survey quartz monzonites, and granites, most of the economic­ intermittently since 1914. A comprehensive account of ally important pegmatites are in schist of the Littleton the detailed work completed during 1942-45 is given by BERYL RESOURCES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Cameron and others (1954), and their report also con­ be so in the future. The economics of pegmatite tains a summary of studies before World War II. mining have been described by Bannerman (1943), and Field studies in 1947 led to a report by Olson (1950) on Bannerman and Cameron (1946). During World the feldspar in the pegmatites. This phase of the in­ War II, under subsidy prices for strategic mica and vestigations was conducted in behalf of the New Hamp­ beryl, some deposits were operated profitably for mica, shire State Planning and Development Commission. but not for long periods. Mines were operated for The purpose of this report is to summarize and bring mica and for beryl during the Korean emergency, again up to date the information on beryl gained in the peg­ under Government-sponsored subsidy programs that matite investigations of 1942-45, to examine in detail were continued in 1957. certain beryl-bearing pegmatites discovered in recent According to data in the Minerals Yearbooks of the years, and to study other pegmatites known or suspected U.S. Bureau of Mines, beryl production in New to contain beryl. Fieldwork was started by J. C. Olson Hampshire since 1939 was as follows: and J. W. Adams in 1947, and was continued by J.
Recommended publications
  • Synthesis of Magnesium- and Silicon-Modified Hydroxyapatites By
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Synthesis of Magnesium- and Silicon-modifed Hydroxyapatites by Microwave-Assisted Method Received: 17 January 2019 Liudmila A. Rasskazova1, Ilya V. Zhuk1, Natalia M. Korotchenko1, Anton S. Brichkov1, Accepted: 19 September 2019 Yu-Wen Chen 2, Evgeniy A. Paukshtis1, Vladimir K. Ivanov1, Irina A. Kurzina 1 & Published: xx xx xxxx Vladimir V. Kozik1 Nanopowders of hydroxyapatite (HA), modifed by magnesium (MgHA) and by silicon (SiHA) were obtained by liquid-phase microwave synthesis method. X-ray difraction and IR spectroscopy results 2+ 4− showed that Mg and SiO4 ions were present in the synthesized products both as secondary phases and as part of the HA phase. Whitlockite was found in the magnesium-modifed HA (MgHA) and larnite was found in the silicon-modifed HA (SiHA); ion substitution for both materials resulted in solid solutions. In the synthesized samples of modifed HA, the increase of particle size of powders was in the order HA < SiHA < MgHA, which was calculated through data specifc surface area and measured pycnometric density of the powders. The Lewis acid sites (Ca2+, Mg2+, Si4+) were present using spectral probes on the surface of the samples of HA, MgHA, and SiHA, and the acidity of these sites decreased in the order SiHA > MgHA > HA. The rates of calcium phosphate layer deposition on the surface of these materials at 37 °C in the model simulated body fuid solution showed similar dependence. Te problem of fnding material for implantation has existed since ancient times. However, towards the end of the twentieth century the requirements for such materials and an informed and scientifcally grounded application began to form.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology Club Mineral: Collecting Trip
    Geology Club: Mineral Collecting Trip (10 October 2009) Trip Notes by Charles Merguerian STOP 1 – Grossular Garnet Locality, West Redding, Connecticut. [UTM Coordinates: 630.71E / 4575.38N, Bethel quadrangle]. Covering roughly 60 acres of land, this enigmatic massive fine-grained grossularite garnet + diopside rock in West Redding has made many mineral collectors and geologists take notice. Walk up the steep slope east of Simpaug Turnpike to see highly fractured, massive cinnamon-colored grossular garnet rock, part of a 0.6-km wide heart-shaped mass found at the faulted contact between the Stockbridge Marble (OCs) and injected muscovitic schist of the Rowe Schist member (OCr) of the Hartland Formation (Figure 1). According to Rodgers et al. (1985), we are very near Cameron’s Line (red and black line in Figure 1). Figure 1 – Geologic map of the area surrounding Stop 1 showing the Proterozoic gneissic rocks (Yg) and Cambrian Dalton Schist (Cd) to the west, the Stockbridge Marble (OCs), Cameron’s Line (CL in red), the injected schistose rocks of the Rowe Formation (OCr), and an Ordovician granitoid (Og) that may be responsible for this unusual Ca++-enriched skarn deposit. Note the NW-trending high-angle brittle faults that cut the region. (Adapted from Rodgers et al. 1985.) Two knolls at this locality are almost entirely composed of grossularite garnet (var. essonite) and lesser clinopyroxene. Mostly the garnet occurs alone with minor quartz and localized quartz veining has been observed. Chemical analysis of the garnet (SiO2 = 39.10%, CaO = 34.85%, Al2O3 = 19.61%, and total FeO+Fe2O3 = 5.44%), are quite similar to published analyses of grossular garnet, including the phenomenal grossular garnet crystals from Morelos, Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals and Mineral Products in Our Bedroom Bed Hematite
    Minerals and Mineral Products in our Bedroom Make-Up Kit Muscovite Bed Talc Hematite: hinges, handles, Mica mattress springs Hematite: for color Chromite: chrome plating Bismuth Radio Barite Copper: wiring Plastic Pail Quartz: clock Mica Gold: connections Cassiterite: solder Toilet Bowl / Tub Closet Feldspar: porcelain Chromite: chrome plating Pyrolusite: coloring Hematite: hinges, handles (steel) Chromite: plumbing fixtures Quartz : mirror on door Copper: tubing Desk Toothpaste Hematite: hinges, handles (steel) Apatite: teeth Chromite: chrome plating Fluorite: toothpaste Mirror Rutile: to color false Hematite: handle, frame teeth yellow Chromite: plating Gold: fillings Gold: plating Cinnabar: fillings Quartz: mirror Towels Table Lamp Sphalerite: dyes Brass (an alloy of copper and Chromite: dyes zinc): base Quartz: bulb Water Pipe/Faucet/Shower bulb Wolframite: lamp filament Brass Copper: wiring Iron Nickel Minerals and Mineral Products in our Bedroom Chrome: stainless steel Bathroom Cleaner Department of Environment and Natural Resources Borax: abrasive, cleaner, and antiseptic MINES AND GEOSCIENCES BUREAU Deodorant Spray Can Cassiterite Chromite Copper Carpet Quartz Sphalerite: dyes Telephone Chromite: dyes Drinking Glasses Copper: wiring Sulfur: foam padding Quartz Chromite: plating Gold: red color Clock Silver: electronics Pentlandite: spring Graphite: batteries Refrigerator Quartz: glass, time keeper Hematite Television Chromite: stainless steel Chromite: plating Computer Galena Wolframite: monitor Wolframite: monitor Copper Copper:
    [Show full text]
  • (M = Ca, Mg, Fe2+), a Structural Base of Ca3mg3(PO4)4 Phosphors
    crystals Article Crystal Chemistry of Stanfieldite, Ca7M2Mg9(PO4)12 (M = Ca, Mg, Fe2+), a Structural Base of Ca3Mg3(PO4)4 Phosphors Sergey N. Britvin 1,2,* , Maria G. Krzhizhanovskaya 1, Vladimir N. Bocharov 3 and Edita V. Obolonskaya 4 1 Department of Crystallography, Institute of Earth Sciences, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya Nab. 7/9, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] 2 Nanomaterials Research Center, Kola Science Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, Fersman Str. 14, 184209 Apatity, Russia 3 Centre for Geo-Environmental Research and Modelling, Saint-Petersburg State University, Ulyanovskaya ul. 1, 198504 St. Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] 4 The Mining Museum, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 2, 21st Line, 199106 St. Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 1 May 2020; Accepted: 25 May 2020; Published: 1 June 2020 Abstract: Stanfieldite, natural Ca-Mg-phosphate, is a typical constituent of phosphate-phosphide assemblages in pallasite and mesosiderite meteorites. The synthetic analogue of stanfieldite is used as a crystal matrix of luminophores and frequently encountered in phosphate bioceramics. However, the crystal structure of natural stanfieldite has never been reported in detail, and the data available so far relate to its synthetic counterpart. We herein provide the results of a study of stanfieldite from the Brahin meteorite (main group pallasite). The empirical formula of the mineral is Ca8.04Mg9.25Fe0.72Mn0.07P11.97O48. Its crystal structure has been solved and refined to R1 = 0.034. Stanfieldite from Brahin is monoclinic, C2/c, a 22.7973(4), b 9.9833(2), c 17.0522(3) Å, β 99.954(2)◦, 3 V 3822.5(1)Å .
    [Show full text]
  • Maine the Way Life Should Be. Mineral Collecting
    MAINE The Way Life Should Be. Mineral Collecting The Maine Publicity Bureau, Inc. Quarries You May Visit # 1 Topsham: The Fisher Quarry is located off Route 24 in Topsham. This locale is best known for crystals of topaz, green microlite, and dark blue tourmaline. It has also produced other minerals such as beryl, uraninite and cassiterite. #2 Machiasport: At an area known as Jasper Beach there is an abundance of vari-colored jasper and/or rhyolite specimens. Located on Route 92. #3 Buckfield: The Bennett Quarry, located between Buckfield and Paris Hill, has produced fine specimens of blue and pink beryl including some gem material. It is also known for crystals of quartz, green tourmaline and rare minerals. #4 Casco: The Chute Prospect is best known for vesuvianite. It is located east of Route 302-35. Crystals of “cinnamon” garnet, quartz and pyrite are also found here. #5 Georgetown: The Consolidated Feldspar Quarry has produced excel­ lent specimens of gem citrine quartz, tourmaline and spodumene. Rose Quartz, cookeite and garnet are also found. #6 Paris: Mount Mica is world famous for tourmaline and this gem material was discovered here in 1821. This is one of the most likely places for a collector to find tourmaline. Mount Mica has produced a host of other minerals including beryl, cookeite, black tourmaline, colum- bite, lepidolite and garnet. (Currently being mined) #7 Greenwood: The Tamminen Quarry and the Harvard Quarry, both located near Route 219, have produced an interesting variety of miner­ als. The Tamminen Quarry is best known for pseudo-cubic quartz crystals, montmorillonite, spodumene and garnet.
    [Show full text]
  • 38Th RMS Program Notes
    E.fu\wsoil 'og PROGRAM Thursday Evening, April 14, 2011 PM 4:00-6:00 Cocktails and Snacks – Hospitality Suite 400 (4th Floor) 6:00-7:45 Dinner – Baxter’s 8:00-9:15 THE GUALTERONI COLLECTION: A TIME CAPSULE FROM A CENTURY AGO – Dr. Renato Pagano In 1950, the honorary curator of the Museum of Natural History in Genoa first introduced Dr. Renato Pagano to mineral collecting as a Boy Scout. He has never looked back. He holds a doctorate in electrical engineering and had a distinguished career as an Italian industrialist. His passion for minerals has produced a collection of more than 13,000 specimens, with both systematic and aesthetic subcollections. His wife Adriana shares his passion for minerals and is his partner in collecting and curating. An excellent profile of Renato, Adriana, and their many collections appeared earlier this year in Mineralogical Record (42:41-52). Tonight Dr. Pagano will talk about an historic mineral collection assembled between 1861 and 1908 and recently acquired intact by the Museum of Natural History of Milan. We most warmly welcome Dr. Renato Pagano back to the speakers’ podium. 9:15 Cocktails and snacks in the Hospitality Suite on the 4th floor will be available throughout the rest of the evening. Dealers’ rooms will be open at this time. All of the dealers are located on the 4th floor. Friday Morning, April 15, 2011 AM 9:00 Announcements 9:15-10:15 CRACKING THE CODE OF PHLOGOPITE DEPOSITS IN QUÉBEC (PARKER MINE), MADAGASCAR (AMPANDANDRAVA) AND RUSSIA (KOVDOR) – Dr. Robert F. Martin Robert François Martin is an emeritus professor of geology at McGill University in Montreal.
    [Show full text]
  • (VHMS) Deposits in the Tasik Chini Area, Peninsular Malaysia: Constraints for Ore Genesis
    minerals Article Geochemistry of Sphalerite from the Permian Volcanic-Hosted Massive Sulphide (VHMS) Deposits in the Tasik Chini Area, Peninsular Malaysia: Constraints for Ore Genesis Mohd Basril Iswadi Basori 1,* , Sarah E. Gilbert 2 , Khin Zaw 3 and Ross R. Large 3 1 Department of Earth Sciences and Environment, Faculty of Science and Technology, The National University of Malaysia (UKM), Selangor 43600, Malaysia 2 Adelaide Microscopy, The University of Adelaide, Frome Road, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; [email protected] 3 Centre for Ore Deposits and Earth Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia; [email protected] (K.Z.); [email protected] (R.R.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +603-8921-5572; Fax: +603-8921-5490 Abstract: The Bukit Botol and Bukit Ketaya deposits are two examples of volcanic-hosted massive sulphide (VHMS) deposits that occur in the Tasik Chini area, Central Belt of Peninsular Malaysia. The mineralisation is divided into subzones distinguished by spatial, mineralogical, and textural characteristics. The primary sulphide minerals include pyrite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite, and galena, with lesser amounts of Sn- and Ag-bearing minerals, with Au. However, pyrrhotite is absent from both deposits. This study presents the results of sphalerite chemistry analysed by using an electron Citation: Basori, M.B.I.; Gilbert, S.E.; microprobe. Two types of sphalerite are recognised: sphalerite from the Bukit Botol deposit reveals a Zaw, K.; Large, R.R. Geochemistry of range of <DL to 24.0 mole% FeS, whereas sphalerite from the Bukit Ketaya deposit shows a range Sphalerite from the Permian of <DL to 3 mole% FeS.
    [Show full text]
  • Selective Separation of Chalcopyrite from Galena Using a Green Reagent Scheme
    minerals Article Selective Separation of Chalcopyrite from Galena Using a Green Reagent Scheme Kaile Zhao 1,2,3, Chao Ma 1,4, Guohua Gu 1,* and Zhiyong Gao 1,* 1 School of Minerals Processing and Bio-Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China; [email protected] (K.Z.); [email protected] (C.M.) 2 State Key Laboratory of Mineral Processing, Beijing 100162, China 3 Institute of Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China 4 Hunan Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Changsha 410004, China * Correspondence: [email protected] (G.G.); [email protected] (Z.G.) Abstract: The study of the depression effect of non-toxic depressants on the flotation separation of chalcopyrite from galena is of great importance for both industrial applications and theoretical research. The mixed depressant (DFinal) of four common inhibitors—sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, sodium silicate, sodium sulfite, and zinc sulfate—exhibited high selectivity during the separation of chalcopyrite from galena. Flotation tests on an industrial copper–lead bulk concentrate showed that using this depressant mixture can achieve highly efficient separation of chalcopyrite from galena at the natural pH of the pulp. Copper and lead concentrates were produced at grades of 21.88% (Cu) and 75.53% (Pb), with recoveries of 89.07% (Cu) and 98.26% (Pb). This showed a similar performance of DFinal with dichromate, which is a depressant that is widely used in industry, but without the environmental risks or the need for pH control. Zeta potential and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) results showed that interaction between the surface of the chalcopyrite and the mixed depressant Citation: Zhao, K.; Ma, C.; Gu, G.; was prevented by pre-treatment with a composite thiophosphate collector (CSU11), while the mixed Gao, Z.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiscale Characterization of Bone Mineral: New Perspectives in Structural Imaging Using X-Ray and Electron Diffraction Contrast Mariana Verezhak
    Multiscale characterization of bone mineral: new perspectives in structural imaging using X-ray and electron diffraction contrast Mariana Verezhak To cite this version: Mariana Verezhak. Multiscale characterization of bone mineral: new perspectives in structural imag- ing using X-ray and electron diffraction contrast. Materials Science [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]. Communauté Universite Grenoble Alpes, 2016. English. tel-01576447 HAL Id: tel-01576447 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01576447 Submitted on 23 Aug 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THESIS In order to obtain the grade of DOCTOR OF GRENOBLE ALPES UNIVERSITY Specialty: Physics/Nanophysics Ministerial order: 7 August 2006 Presented by « Mariana / VEREZHAK » Thesis supervised by « Marie/PLAZANET » and co-supervised by « Aurélien/GOURRIER » Prepared at Laboratory of Interdisciplinary Physics at Doctoral School of Physics of Grenoble Multiscale characterization of bone mineral: new perspectives in structural imaging using X-ray and electron diffraction contrast Thesis is publically defended on « 28 October 2016 », in front of the jury composed of : Prof. Franz BRUCKERT Grenoble INP UGA, President of jury Dr. Aurélien GOURRIER LIPhy, Grenoble, co-Director of thesis Prof. Thomas LAGRANGE Institute of Technology of Lausanne, Examiner Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC SETTING and GENETIC INTERPRETATION of the BOQUIRA Pb-Zn DEPOSITS, BAHIA STATE, BRAZIL
    Revista Brasileira de Geociências 12(1-3):.414-425, Marv-get., 1982 - São Paulo GEOLOGIC SETTING AND GENETIC INTERPRETATION OF THE BOQUIRA Pb-Zn DEPOSITS, BAHIA STATE, BRAZIL ILSON O. CARVALHO·, HALF ZANTOp·· and JOAQUIM R.F. TORQUATO··· AB8TRACT The stratabound~straflform:Pb~Zn-AgMCd sulfide deposits of Boquira, located ln south-central Bahia State, occur in metamorphic rocks ofthe Archean Boquira Formation. This formation is composed ofaltered volcanic rocks, schists, quartzites, iron formation, and dolomitic marbles which are the metamorphiclequivalents of intermediate to acidic volcanic rocks, volcani­ clastic sediments, chert and iron-rlch chemical sediments. These rocks were intruded by granitic magmas in the late Proterozoic time. The massive to semimassive ore lenscs are conformably enclosed in the silicate facies of lhe Contendas-Boquira Member. The primary ore is composed of galena and sphalerite in a gangue of magnetite, maghemite, martite, and minor pyrite, pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite, quartz and amphi­ boles. Thelassociation of the iron formation with volcanic rocks suggests that it is of Algoman type, and the conformable relationships between the iron formation and thc sulfide lemes suggest that the 'sulfides are also volcanic exhalative. ln addition, isotcpic analyses of carbonate suggest a marine depositional environment ar the vicinities of subaqueous centers of discharge of hydro­ thermal brines. INTRODUCTION TheBoquiraPb-ZnDistrictissituated The contact between the B.F. and the basement is not sharp in lhe south-central area of Bahia State, about 450km west and it is inarked by transitional rock types, and diffused of the city of Salvador. Its area is about 170 km' localized metasomatic effects. The metasomatism appears caused between coordinates 12'OO'-13'15'S and 42'30'-43'W (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rutile Deposits of the Eastern United States
    THE RUTILE DEPOSITS OF THE EASTERN UNITED STATES. By THOMAS L. WATSON. INTRODUCTION. The titanium-bearing minerals comprise more than 60 distinct species, grouped under a variety of mineral and chemical forms, chiefly as oxides, titanates, titano-silicates, silicates, columbates, and iantalates. These minerals are widely distributed in a variety of associations and in such quantity as to make titanium a relatively abundant element. Clarke* estimates the. amount of titanium in the solid crust of the earth to be 0.44 per cent, equivalent in oxide to 0.73 per cent, the element thus standing in the ninth place in the scale of abundance, next to potassium. Most of the titanium-bearing minerals, however, are rare and are only of scientific interest. The largest concentrations of the element are as oxide (rutile), as iron titanate (ilmenite), and in iron ferrate (magnetite) as intergrown ilmenite. Of these three forms the prin­ cipal source of the element at present is rutile. The known workable deposits of rutile, however, are extremely few and widely sepa­ rated, and as the demand for titanium has greatly increased in the last few years it has been necessary for some uses to turn to ilmenite or highly titaniferous magnetites. This paper briefly summarizes present knowledge of the geology of the rutile deposits in the eastern United States and for the sake of comparison discusses several foreign deposits, each of which has produced some rutile. Of the known deposits in the United, States only those in Virginia are of commercial importance. These have been made the subject of a special report 2 by the Virginia Geological Survey, which was preceded by a preliminary paper on the rutile deposits of Amherst and Nelson counties.3 1 Clarke, F.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Collecting Sites in North Carolina by W
    .'.' .., Mineral Collecting Sites in North Carolina By W. F. Wilson and B. J. McKenzie RUTILE GUMMITE IN GARNET RUBY CORUNDUM GOLD TORBERNITE GARNET IN MICA ANATASE RUTILE AJTUNITE AND TORBERNITE THULITE AND PYRITE MONAZITE EMERALD CUPRITE SMOKY QUARTZ ZIRCON TORBERNITE ~/ UBRAR'l USE ONLV ,~O NOT REMOVE. fROM LIBRARY N. C. GEOLOGICAL SUHVEY Information Circular 24 Mineral Collecting Sites in North Carolina By W. F. Wilson and B. J. McKenzie Raleigh 1978 Second Printing 1980. Additional copies of this publication may be obtained from: North CarOlina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development Geological Survey Section P. O. Box 27687 ~ Raleigh. N. C. 27611 1823 --~- GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SECTION The Geological Survey Section shall, by law"...make such exami­ nation, survey, and mapping of the geology, mineralogy, and topo­ graphy of the state, including their industrial and economic utilization as it may consider necessary." In carrying out its duties under this law, the section promotes the wise conservation and use of mineral resources by industry, commerce, agriculture, and other governmental agencies for the general welfare of the citizens of North Carolina. The Section conducts a number of basic and applied research projects in environmental resource planning, mineral resource explora­ tion, mineral statistics, and systematic geologic mapping. Services constitute a major portion ofthe Sections's activities and include identi­ fying rock and mineral samples submitted by the citizens of the state and providing consulting services and specially prepared reports to other agencies that require geological information. The Geological Survey Section publishes results of research in a series of Bulletins, Economic Papers, Information Circulars, Educa­ tional Series, Geologic Maps, and Special Publications.
    [Show full text]