DOCSLIB.ORG

The Ecology of the Slow-Worm (Anguis Fragilis L.) in Southern

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Ecology of the Slow-Worm (Anguis Fragilis L.) in Southern UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON THE ECOLOGY OF THE SLOW-WORM (ANGUIS FRAGILIS L.) IN SOUTHERN ENGLAND. A Thesis submitted for the Degree of Master of Philosophy. Department of Biology, University of Southampton, NICHOLAS DANE SMITH 1990 TO JANE Slow-worm. The blind worm; a large viper, not mortal, scarcely venomous. Dr. Johnson (1785), A Dictionary of the English Language. If the adder could hear, and the blindworm see. Neither man nor beast would ere go free. Old rhyme, quoted by Skeat (1910), An Etymological Dictionary of the English Language, 4th Edition. all Double, double toil and trouble: Fire burn and cauldron bubble. 2nd witch Fillet of a fenny snake; In the cauldron, boil and bake; Eye of newt, and toe of frog. Wool of bat, and tongue of dog. Adder's fork and blind-worm's sting. Lizard's leg and howlet's wing. For a charm of powerful trouble Like a hell-broth boil and bubble. Macbeth IV, i 10-19. CONTENTS ABSTRACT X ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 ANGUIS FRAGILIS AND THE FAMILY ANGUIDAE 1 1.2 A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SLOW-WORM 2 1.3 DISTRIBUTION OF THE SLOW-WORM 5 1.4 DISTRIBUTION AND STATUS OF THE SLOW-WORM IN THE BRITISH ISLES 8 1.5 LITERATURE AND PREVIOUS WORK ON THE SLOW-WORM 11 1.6 AIMS OF THE PRESENT STUDY 12 CHAPTER 2. GENERAL METHODS 14 2.1 INTRODUCTION 14 2.2 STUDY SITES 14 2.3 FIELD METHODS 16 2.3.1 Searching and captures 16 2.3.2 Site visits 17 2.3.3 Data from finds of slow-worms 18 2.4 IDENTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS 20 2.4.1 Introduction 20 2.4.2 The photographic method 21 2.4.3 Advantages and disadvantages of photography 22 2.5 THE STUDY OF REPRODUCTION 23 2.6 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS 24 CHAPTER 3. CAPTURES AND MOVEMENTS 2 6 3.1 INTRODUCTION 2 6 3.2 ANALYSIS 27 3.2.1 The sex and size categories 27 3.2.2 Finds of slow-worms at each visit to a site 28 3.2.3 The dates of entering and leaving hibernation 28 3.2.4 Relationship of weather conditions to finds of slow-worms 29 IV 3.2.5 Analysis of the frequency of capture of individuals 30 3.2.6 Analysis of movements and ranges 30 3.2.7 Finds of other vertebrate species 33 3.3 RESULTS 33 3.3.1 Numbers of slow-worms found 33 3.3.2 Emergence from and retreat into hibernation 33 3.3.3 Monthly variation in the numbers of slow-worms found per visit 35 3.3.4 Relationship of weather conditions to finds of slow-worms 36 3.3.5 Frequencies of capture of individuals 37 3.3.6 Movements 38 3.3.7 Areas and ranges of movement 4 0 3.3.8 Finds of other vertebrate species 42 3.4 DISCUSSION 44 3.4.1 Numbers of slow-worm found per visit and weather 44 3.4.2 Hibernation in the slow-worm 44 3.4.4 Movements 4 6 CHAPTER 4. REPRODUCTION 4 8 4.1 INTRODUCTION 4 8 4.2 ANALYSIS OF DATA 50 4.2.1. Introduction 50 4.2.2 Date of mating 51 4.2.3 Date of birth 51 4.2.4 Frequency of reproduction 52 4.2.5 Size of litters 53 4.2.6 Size and weight of young at birth 53 4.2.7 The possible effects of tail loss by the mother on litter size and size of young 53 4.2.8 Size of litters related to size of female 53 4.2.9 Size and weight of young related to size of female 54 V 4.2.10 Total weight of litter related to size of female 54 4.2.11 Incidence of dead and deformed young 55 4.3 RESULTS 55 4.3.1 Date of mating 55 4.3.2 Date of birth 57 4.3.3 Frequency of reproduction 57 4.3.4 Size of litters 58 4.3.5 Size and weight of young at birth 58 4.3.6 The possible effects of tail loss by the mother on litter size and size of young 59 4.3.7 Size of litters related to size of female 60 4.3.8 Size and weight of young related to size of female 61 4.3.9 Total weight of litter related to size of female 61 4.3.10 Incidence of dead and deformed young 61 4.4 DISCUSSION 63 4.4.1 Comparison with older work on the slow- worm 63 4.4.2 Possible effects of the loss of the tail 63 4.4.3 The slow-worm and viviparity 65 4.4.4 Size of female and size of young 66 4.4.5 Incidence of dead and deformed young 67 4.4.6 The work of Patterson (1983) 69 CHAPTER 5. POPULATION ECOLOGY 72 5.1 INTRODUCTION 72 5.2 ANALYSIS 72 5.2.1 Introduction 72 5.2.2 Estimation of the total numbers of young born 74 5.2.3 The sex ratio 75 5.2.4 Size classes 75 5.2.5 Density estmates 76 5.3 RESULTS 7 6 VI 5.3.1 Total numbers of young born 7 6 5.3.2 The sex ratio 76 5.3.3 Size classes 77 5.3.4 Density estmates 78 5.4 DISCUSSION 78 CHAPTER 6 GROWTH 8 0 6.1 INTRODUCTION 8 0 6.2 METHODS AND ANALYSIS 80 6.2.1 Possible growth models 80 6.2.2 First year and older juveniles 82 6.2.3 Sub-adults and adults 83 6.2.4 Maximum size of adults 84 6.3 RESULTS 85 6.3.1 Growth from birth to the first hibernation 85 6.3.2 Growth in the first full season 85 6.3-. 3 Growth of sub-adults and adults 87 6.3.4 Maximum size of adults 88 6.4 DISCUSSION 89 CHAPTER 7. TEMPERATURE RELATIONS 91 7.1 INTRODUCTION 91 7.2 METHODS AND ANALYSIS 94 7.2.1 Field measurements 94 7.2.2 Measurement of the "maximum tolerated temperature" 95 7.2.3 Analysis 95 7.3 RESULTS 9 6 7.3.1 Differences between the sexes 96 7.3.2 Comparison of the two main sites. 97 7.3.3 Relationship between cloacal and air temperatures 98 7.3.4 Relationship between SVL and temperatures 98 7.3.5 Variation of temperatures with month 99 7.3.6 Variation of temperatures with hour 100 7.3.7 Variation of temperatures with cloud cover 100 Vll 7.3.8 Variation of temperatures with proportion of tin in sun 101 7.3.9 Variation of temperatures with whether animal in sun or not 101 7.3.10 Variation of temperatures with level of wind strength 102 7.3.11 "Maximum tolerated temperature" 102 7.4. DISCUSSION 103 7.4.1 Methods and results of the present study 103 7.4.2 Comparison of data with other species 105 CHAPTER 8 CLIMATE AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE SLOW-WORM 110 8.1 INTRODUCTION 110 8.2 DISTRIBUTION OF THE SLOW-WORM IN THE IBERIAN PENINSULA 111 8.3 CLIMATE STATIONS AND VARIABLES 112 8.4 ANALYSIS 114 8.5 RESULTS 116 8.6 DISCUSSION 118 CHAPTER 9 SOME MISCELLANEOUS CONSIDERATIONS 122 9.1 INTRODUCTION 122 9.2 WHAT DO SLOW-WORMS EAT? 122 9.3 WHAT EATS SLOW-WORMS? 123 9.4 THE PATTERN AND COLORATION OF SLOW-WORMS 125 REFERENCES APPENDIX Vlll UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY Master of Philosophy THE ECOLOGY OF THE SLOW-WORM (ANGUIS FRAGILIS L.) IN SOUTHERN ENGLAND by Nicholas Dane Smith The slow-worm, Anguis fraqilis, is a legless lizard in the family Anguidae. The ecology of the species was studied by weekly visits to two sites on the Isle of Purbeck, Dorset, England from 1981 to 1988. Other sites were visited less often. Animals were found under pieces of corrugated iron sheet that had been placed on the ground. Adults were photographed and identified on recapture by the pattern on the underside of the head. Pregnant females were retained in captivity until the birth of the young. A total of 3456 slow-worms were found. Capture rates of known individuals were low, often less than once a year. There were differences in rate of captures of four sex and size class over the season. Males predominated in spring, females were found most often in summer and sub-adults and juveniles were commonest in autumn. Rates of movement were low. There was no evidence of territory formation. Mating was only observed once. Females with sperm in the cloaca were found in May. The litters of 1 to 18 (average 8) were born in late summer. Larger females had larger litters but not larger young. In 1986, litter sizes were small with many of the young deformed. The sex ratios were not equal. The bias was to females at one site and to males at the other. Cloacal temperatures, low for a temperate reptile, ranged from 9.8 to 33.2 "C, with a median of 24.9 °C. There was little evidence of precise thermoregulation. Cloacal temperatures were highest in summer on sunny days, but varied little with time of day. The distribution in the Iberian peninsula was shown by discriminant function analysis to be correlated with cooler, wetter climates. IX ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people contributed in large and small ways to this work.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pseudopus Apodus (PALLAS, 1775) from Jordan, with Notes on Its Ecology (Sqamata: Sauria: Anguidae)
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Herpetozoa Jahr/Year: 2005 Band/Volume: 18_3_4 Autor(en)/Author(s): Rifai Lina B., Abu Baker Mohammad, Disi Ahmad M., Mahasneh Ahmad, Amr Zuhair S., Al Shafei Darweesh Artikel/Article: Pseudopus apodus (PALLAS, 1775) form Jordan, with notes on ist ecology 133-140 ©Österreichische Gesellschaft für Herpetologie e.V., Wien, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at HERPETOZOA 18 (3/4): 133 - 140 133 Wien, 30. Dezember 2005 Pseudopus apodus (PALLAS, 1775) from Jordan, with notes on its ecology (Sqamata: Sauria: Anguidae) Pseudopus apodus (PALLAS, 1775) von Jordanien, mit Bemerkungen zu seiner Ökologie (Sqamata: Sauria: Anguidae) LINA RIFAI & MOHAMMAD ABU BAKER & DARWEESH AL SHAFEI & AHMAD DISI & AHMAD MAHASNEH & ZUHAIR AMR KURZFASSUNG Weitere Exemplare der Panzerschleiche Pseudopus apodus (PALLAS, 1775) werden aus Jordanien beschrie- ben. Morphologische und ökologische Merkmale sowie die gegenwärtig bekannte Verbreitung werden dargestellt. Pseudopus apodus ist in seinem jordanischen Vorkommen auf die Berge im mediterran beeinflußtenen Norden beschränkt. Die mittlere Anzahl der Rücken- und Bauchschuppenquerreihen sowie das Verhältnis von Kopflänge zu Kopfbreite jordanischer Exemplare werden mit Angaben für P. apodus apodus und P. apodus thracicus (OBST, 1978) verglichen. Im Magen und Darm von sieben Exemplaren aus Jordanien fanden sich Überreste von Arthro- poden und Mollusken, wobei Orthopteren den zahlenmäßig größten Anteil an Nahrungsobjekten ausmachten. ABSTRACT Further specimens of the Glass Lizard Pseudopus apodus (PALLAS, 1775) are described from Jordan. Mor- phological and ecological characters as well as the currently known distribution in Jordan are presented. In Jordan, Pseudopus apodus is confined to the northern Mediterranean mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibians and Reptiles in South Wales the Difference Between Amphibians and Reptiles
    Amphibians & Reptiles i n S o u t h W a l e s ! ! ! ! ENVT0836 Amphibians and Reptiles in South Wales The difference between Amphibians and Reptiles Grass Snake © SWWARG Amphibians and reptiles are two ancient ! groups of animals that have been on the Smooth Newt © ARC planet for a very long time. The study of amphibians and reptiles is known as Amphibians, such as frogs, toads and ! Herpetology. To simplify matters, both newts, possess a porous skin that, when groups of animals will be referred to moist, exchanges oxygen meaning they throughout this booklet collectively as breathe through their skin. All amphibian Herpetofauna. Examples of both groups species in South Wales have to return to of animals live throughout South Wales water for breeding purposes. Adult and display a fascinating range of amphibians lay spawn in fresh water behaviour and survival tactics. bodies which then hatch and pass through a larval or tadpole stage prior to Common Lizard- female © SWWARG metamorphosing into miniature versions of the adults. • Generally possess smooth, moist skin • Generally slow moving Herpetofauna populations in South Wales • Generally in or around water are under ever increasing pressure due to a variety of reasons such as habitat loss, Common Toad © SWWARG colony isolation and human encroachment. There are many ways in which we can assist this group of misunderstood animals, which this booklet will attempt to highlight so that the reader can make their own valuable contribution towards helping to conserve both the animals and their habitat. ! page one Reptiles such as snakes and lizards, like amphibians, are cold blooded or ectotherms.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Structure and Translocation of the Slow-Worm, Anguis Fragilis L
    Population structure and translocation of the Slow-worm, Anguis fragilis L. D. S. HUBBLE1 and D. T. HURST2 1 7 Ainsley Gardens, Eastleigh, Hampshire SO50 4NX, UK E-mail: [email protected] [Corresponding author] 2 3 Bye Road, Swanwick, Hamphsire SO31 7GX, UK ABSTRACT — Proposed redevelopment work in Petersfield, Hampshire required capture and translocation of Slow-worms to fulfil the legal obligations of 1981 Wildlife and Countryside Act (as amended). Numbers of adult males, adult females and juveniles were recorded. Only 3 of 577 Slow-worms captured were found moving or basking on the surface. On days with high capture rates, females and juveniles were more active. The disturbance pattern due to sampling, as well as human activity not related to translocation, affected capture rates. The settling-in period for refugia was not as important as believed. When translocating Slow-worms, it is important to ensure significant capture effort is made throughout the season rather than attempting to choose ‘suitable’ conditions. It is also important to ensure that the density of refugia placement is as high as possible. LTHOUGH frequently occurring close to Although attempts have been made to Ahuman habitation, the Slow-worm is poorly standardise reptile survey methods (Reading, understood due to its secretive behaviour, the 1996, Reading, 1997), there is no single accepted difficulty of studying individuals over long standard methodology for surveying reptile periods and the subsequent lack of detailed study populations (RSPB et al., 1994). UK Government (Beebee & Griffiths, 2000). The species is body English Nature advise that the method used widespread in the South and South East of for translocation should be based on guidelines England but there are indications of a decline produced by the Herpetofauna Groups of Britain during the second half of the 20th century (Baker et and Ireland (HGBI, 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological and Molecular Taxonomy of Helminths of the Slow Worm, Anguis Fragilis (Linnaeus) (Squamata: Anguidae) from Turkey
    BIHAREAN BIOLOGIST 13 (1): 36-38 ©Biharean Biologist, Oradea, Romania, 2019 Article No.: e181308 http://biozoojournals.ro/bihbiol/index.html Morphological and molecular taxonomy of helminths of the slow worm, Anguis fragilis (Linnaeus) (Squamata: Anguidae) from Turkey Nurhan SÜMER*, Sezen BİRLİK and Hikmet Sami YILDIRIMHAN Uludag University, Science and Literature Faculty, Department of Biology, 16059 Bursa, Turkey. E-mail's: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] * Corresponding author, N. Sümer , E-mail: [email protected] Received: 21. May 2018 / Accepted: 07. November 2018 / Available online: 12. November 2018 / Printed: June 2019 Abstract. Fifteen specimens of the slow worm, Anguis fragilis (two juvenile, five males and eight females), collected in Trabzon and Bursa Provinces, Turkey, were examined for helminths. Anguis fragilis was found to harbour four species of helminths: one species of Digenea, Brachylaemus sp. and three species of Nematoda, Entomelas entomelas, Oxysomatium brevicaudatum and Oswaldocruzia filiformis. In addition, DNA isolated from the Nematodes was analysed with clustal w and blast computer programs for nucleotide sequences. Anguis fragilis from Turkey represents a new host record for Brachylaemus sp. Also, 28s rDNA sequencing of Oxysomatium brevicaudatum and Oswaldocruzia filiformis produced new nucleotide sequences submitted to Genebank (NCBI: National Center for Biotechnology Information). To the knowledge, this is the first DNA analysis of the helminth fauna of Anguis fragilis. Key words: Anguis fragilis, Digenea, Nematoda, DNA sequence, taxonomy. Introduction Çaykara (40°45’N, 40°15’E, 400 m elevation, n=3) and Bursa (40°10’N, 29° 05’E, 500 m elevation, n=12) and transported to the The slow worm, Anguis fragilis Linnaeus, 1758, inhabits parasitology laboratory for necropsy.
    [Show full text]
  • The IWT National Survey of the Common Lizard (Lacerta Vivipara) in Ireland 2007
    The IWT National Survey of the Common Lizard (Lacerta vivipara) in Ireland 2007 This project was sponsored by the National Parks and Wildlife Service Table of Contents 1.0 Common Lizards – a Description 3 2.0 Introduction to the 2007 Survey 4 2.1 How “common” is the common lizard in Ireland? 4 2.2 History of common lizard surveys in Ireland 4 2.3 National Common Lizard Survey 2007 5 3.0 Methodology 6 4.0 Results 7 4.1 Lizard sightings by county 7 4.2 Time of year of lizard sightings 8 4.3 Habitat type of the common lizard 11 4.4 Weather conditions at time of lizard sighting 12 4.5 Time of day of lizard sighting 13 4.6 Lizard behaviour at time of sighting 14 4.7 How did respondents hear about the National Lizard Survey 2007? 14 5.0 Discussion 15 6.0 Acknowledgements 16 7.0 References 17 8.0 Appendices 18 1 List of Tables Table 1 Lizard Sightings by County 9 Table 2 Time of Year of Lizard Sightings 10 Table 3 Habitat types of the Common Lizard 12 Table 4 Weather conditions at Time of Lizard Sighting 13 Table 5 Time of Day of Lizard Sighting 13 Some of the many photographs submitted to IWT during 2007 2 1.0 Common Lizard, Lacerta vivipara Jacquin – A Description The Common Lizard, Lacerta vivipara is Ireland’s only native reptile species. The slow-worm, Anguis fragilis, is found in the Burren in small numbers. However it is believed to have been deliberately introduced in the 1970’s (McGuire and Marnell, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Reptile Habitat Management Handbook
    Reptile Habitat Management Handbook Paul Edgar, Jim Foster and John Baker Acknowledgements The production of this handbook was assisted by a review panel: Tony Gent, John Buckley, Chris Gleed-Owen, Nick Moulton, Gary Powell, Mike Preston, Jon Webster and Bill Whitaker (Amphibian and Reptile Conservation); Dave Bird (British Herpetological Society); Lee Brady (Calumma Ecological Services and Kent Reptile and Amphibian Group); John Newton and Martin Noble. The authors are grateful for input from, and discussion with, many other site managers and reptile ecologists, especially Dave Bax, Chris Dresh, Mike Ewart, Barry Kemp, Nigel Hand, Gemma Harding, Steve Hiner, Peter Hughes, Richie Johnson, Kevin Morgan, Mark Robinson, Mark Warne and Paul Wilkinson. The text benefited greatly from a workshop run by Paul Edgar and Jim Foster at the Herpetofauna orkers’W Meeting in 2007 – many thanks to all who contributed. The copyright of the photographs generously donated for this publication remains with the photographers. Note that no criticism is intended of any site managers or organisations whose sites feature in photographs characterised here as poor habitat for reptiles. The images have been chosen simply to illustrate key points of principle. Their inclusion here is not a comment on the management or condition of the sites depicted. Amphibian and Reptile Conservation thanks Natural England for financial support in producing this handbook. Amphibian and Reptile Conservation is also grateful to the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation for support through the Widespread Species Project. Feedback contact details We welcome any suggestions for improving this handbook. Please email [email protected] with ‘RHMH feedback’ as the subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Name: Site Reference 48 - St Clements Hospital Grounds
    Ipswich Wildlife Audit 2012 Site name: Site reference 48 - St Clements Hospital Grounds IBC ref: W35/UC185 Site status: No wildlife designation Grid ref: TM 19020 43840 Area: 12.64 hectares Date: 24 th August 2012 Recorder: S Bullion Weather conditions: Cool, cloudy 18°C, slight shower at end of afternoon Ranking: 4 Biodiversity value: Medium Map: SWT Trading Ltd: Ecological Consultants Ipswich Wildlife Audit 2012 Photos: Car park looking north-east towards woodland belt on road frontage Hospital buildings viewed from south SWT Trading Ltd: Ecological Consultants Ipswich Wildlife Audit 2012 Rough grassland in south-west corner Outbuildings in south-west Habitat type(s): Short mown grass, un-mown rough grassland, tall grass and scrub, tree belt Subsidiary habitats: Mature/veteran trees SWT Trading Ltd: Ecological Consultants Ipswich Wildlife Audit 2012 Site description: Within this large site are the older buildings of the St Clements Hospital as well as more modern buildings throughout the site. A mature tree belt screens the buildings from the Foxhall Road. Amenity grassland surrounds most of the buildings, but the eastern areas have been left unmown at the time of the survey. To the rear of the main hospital buildings are former gardens and much of the centre of the site is occupied by a playing field within which is a bowls square screened by a beech hedge. To the south-west are a sports/recreational centre and football pitch and also older buildings which may have been former stabling/coach houses. The small plot of land adjoining the railway line is rough grassland and scrub, with mature pine trees.
    [Show full text]
  • The Herpetofauna of Wiltshire
    The Herpetofauna of Wiltshire Gareth Harris, Gemma Harding, Michael Hordley & Sue Sawyer March 2018 Wiltshire & Swindon Biological Records Centre and Wiltshire Amphibian & Reptile Group Acknowledgments All maps were produced by WSBRC and contain Ordnance Survey data © Crown Copyright and database right 2018. Wiltshire & Swindon Biological Records Centre staff and volunteers are thanked for all their support throughout this project, as well as the recorders of Wiltshire Amphibian & Reptile Group and the numerous recorders and professional ecologists who contributed their data. Purgle Linham, previously WSBRC centre manager, in particular, is thanked for her help in producing the maps in this publication, even after commencing a new job with Natural England! Adrian Bicker, of Living Record (livingrecord.net) is thanked for supporting wider recording efforts in Wiltshire. The Wiltshire Archaeological & Natural History Publications Society are thanked for financially supporting this project. About us Wiltshire & Swindon Biological Records Centre Wiltshire & Swindon Biological Records Centre (WSBRC), based at Wiltshire Wildlife Trust, is the county’s local environmental records centre and has been operating since 1975. WSBRC gathers, manages and interprets detailed information on wildlife, sites, habitats and geology and makes this available to a wide range of users. This information comes from a considerable variety of sources including published reports, commissioned surveys and data provided by voluntary and other organisations. Much of the species data are collected by volunteer recorders, often through our network of County Recorders and key local and national recording groups. Wiltshire Amphibian & Reptile Group (WARG) Wiltshire Amphibian and Reptile Group (WARG) was established in 2008. It consists of a small group of volunteers who are interested in the conservation of British reptiles and amphibians.
    [Show full text]
  • A303 Stonehenge Preliminary Environmental Information Report
    A303 Stonehenge Amesbury to Berwick Down Preliminary Environmental Information Report February 2018 A303 Stonehenge – Amesbury to Berwick Down Preliminary Environmental Information Report Table of Contents Chapter Pages 1 Introduction 7 1.1 Overview and need for the proposed scheme 7 1.2 The purpose of the report 7 1.3 Legislative and policy framework 8 1.4 The Applicant 10 1.5 Stakeholder engagement 10 1.6 Structure of this PEI Report 11 1.7 The EIA team 13 1.8 Next steps 13 2 The Proposed Scheme 15 2.1 Project location 15 2.2 Description of the proposed scheme 15 2.3 Construction 25 3 Assessment of Alternatives 31 3.1 Scheme history 31 3.2 Selection of the proposed scheme 31 3.3 Development of the proposed scheme 34 3.4 Appraisal of options presented for consultation 35 4 Environmental Assessment Methodology 40 4.1 General approach 40 4.2 Study area and site boundary 41 4.3 Existing baseline and future conditions 42 4.4 Potential significant effects and mitigation 42 4.5 Major events 46 4.6 Human health 47 5 Air Quality 49 5.1 Introduction 49 5.2 Stakeholder engagement 49 5.3 Assessment assumptions and limitations 50 5.4 Study area 51 5.5 Baseline conditions 52 5.6 Potential impacts 55 5.7 Design, mitigation and enhancement measures 56 5.8 Assessment of effects 57 3 A303 Stonehenge – Amesbury to Berwick Down Preliminary Environmental Information Report 5.9 Corridors for utility connections 61 6 Cultural Heritage 62 6.1 Introduction 62 6.2 Stakeholder engagement 62 6.3 Assessment assumptions and limitations 63 6.4 Study area 63 6.5 Baseline
    [Show full text]
  • The New Mode of Thought of Vertebrates' Evolution
    etics & E en vo g lu t lo i y o h n a P r f y Journal of Phylogenetics & Kupriyanova and Ryskov, J Phylogen Evolution Biol 2014, 2:2 o B l i a o n l r o DOI: 10.4172/2329-9002.1000129 u g o y J Evolutionary Biology ISSN: 2329-9002 Short Communication Open Access The New Mode of Thought of Vertebrates’ Evolution Kupriyanova NS* and Ryskov AP The Institute of Gene Biology RAS, 34/5, Vavilov Str. Moscow, Russia Abstract Molecular phylogeny of the reptiles does not accept the basal split of squamates into Iguania and Scleroglossa that is in conflict with morphological evidence. The classical phylogeny of living reptiles places turtles at the base of the tree. Analyses of mitochondrial DNA and nuclear genes join crocodilians with turtles and places squamates at the base of the tree. Alignment of the reptiles’ ITS2s with the ITS2 of chordates has shown a high extent of their similarity in ancient conservative regions with Cephalochordate Branchiostoma floridae, and a less extent of similarity with two Tunicata, Saussurea tunicate, and Rinodina tunicate. We have performed also an alignment of ITS2 segments between the two break points coming into play in 5.8S rRNA maturation of Branchiostoma floridaein pairs with orthologs from different vertebrates where it was possible. A similarity for most taxons fluctuates between about 50 and 70%. This molecular analysis coupled with analysis of phylogenetic trees constructed on a basis of manual alignment, allows us to hypothesize that primitive chordates being the nearest relatives of simplest vertebrates represent the real base of the vertebrate phylogenetic tree.
    [Show full text]
  • Cranial Kinesis in Lepidosaurs: Skulls in Motion
    Topics in Functional and Ecological Vertebrate Morphology, pp. 15-46. P. Aerts, K. D’Août, A. Herrel & R. Van Damme, Eds. © Shaker Publishing 2002, ISBN 90-423-0204-6 Cranial Kinesis in Lepidosaurs: Skulls in Motion Keith Metzger Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, USA. Abstract This chapter reviews various aspects of cranial kinesis, or the presence of moveable joints within the cranium, with a concentration on lepidosaurs. Previous studies tend to focus on morphological correlates of cranial kinesis, without taking into account experimental evidence supporting or refuting the presence of the various forms of cranial kinesis in these taxa. By reviewing experimental and anatomical evidence, the validity of putative functional hypotheses for cranial kinesis in lepidosaurs is addressed. These data are also considered with respect to phylogeny, as such an approach is potentially revealing regarding the development of various forms of cranial kinesis from an evolutionary perspective. While existing evidence does not allow for events leading to the origin of cranial kinesis in lepidosaurs to be clearly understood at the present time, the potential role of exaptation in its development for specific groups (i.e., cordylids, gekkonids, varanids) is considered here. Directions for further research include greater understanding of the distribution of cranial kinesis in lepidosaurs, investigation of intraspecific variation of this feature (with a focus on ontogenetic factors and prey properties as variables which may influence the presence of kinesis), and continued study of the relationship between experimentally proven observation of cranial kinesis and cranial morphology. Key words: cranial kinesis, lepidosaur skull, functional morphology. Introduction Cranial kinesis, or the presence of moveable joints within the cranium, has been a subject of considerable interest to researchers for more than a century (for references see Bock, 1960; Frazzetta, 1962; Smith, 1982).
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibians and Reptiles As Prey of Birds in Southwestern Europe
    AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES AS PREY OF BIRDS IN SOUTHWESTERN EUROPE JOSE MARTIW PILAR LOPEZ Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales de Madrid SMITHSONIAN HERPET0L06ICAL INFORMATION SERVICE NO. 82 1990 SMITHSONIAN HERPETOLOGICAL INFORMATION SERVICE The SHIS series publishes and distributes translations, bibliographies, indices, and similar items judged useful to individuals interested in the biology of amphibians and reptiles, but unlikely to be published in the normal technical journals. Single copies are distributed free to interested individuals. Libraries, herpetological associations, and research laboratories are invited to exchange their publications with the Division of Amphibians and Reptiles. We wish to encourage individuals to share their bibliographies, translations, etc. with other herpetologists through the SHIS series. If you have such items please contact George Zug for instructions on preparation and submission. Contributors receive 50 free copies. Please address all requests for copies and inquiries to George Zug, Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC 20560 USA. Please include a self-addressed mailing label with requests. INTRODUCTION This review surveys species of amphibians and reptiles that are reported prey of birds in southwestern Europe. These ectothermic animals are important in Mediterranean and temperate ecosystems, because they are the prey for many specialist birds (eg, the short-toed eagle, Circaetus gall icus . a snake eater). However, European herpetologists know the identity of few amphibian and reptilian predators. In the recently published "Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas", references to predation are scarce and even ignored. However, the ornithological literature contains numerous papers on bird diets, and amphibians and reptiles are frequently cited as bird preys.
    [Show full text]