DOCSLIB.ORG

Taconic State Park Master Plan Environmental Impact Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Taconic State Park Master Plan Environmental Impact Statement Taconic State Park Master Plan Columbia and Dutchess Counties Towns of Copake, Ancram, and Northeast, NY Environmental Impact Statement June 27, 2018 ii Acknowledgements The Taconic State Park Master Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement are the result of a cooperative effort by many persons. The Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation acknowledges the time and effort of everyone who participated in the development of these documents. In a cooperative effort, the Agency worked with and coordinated input from the following agencies and organizations: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, the Friends of Taconic State Park, New York Natural Heritage Program, New York – New Jersey Trail Conference, and many other organizations. Rose Harvey Commissioner Robert Hiltbrand Executive Deputy Commissioner Tom Alworth Deputy Commissioner for Natural Resources Linda Cooper, AICP Regional Director, Taconic Region Taconic Regional Staff Chris Rickard, Park Manager Jesse Jaycox, Natural Resource Steward (Biologist) Garrett Jobson, RLA, Capital Facilities Manager Raymond Doherty, General Park Manager Albany Staff Sara Hart, Park Planner Salim Chishti, former Park Planner Ron Rausch, Division Director for Environmental Stewardship and Planning Diana Carter, Assistant Division Director for Planning Chris Morris, Trails Planner Janet Zuckerman, Environmental Analyst Lynne Gort, Parks and Recreation Aide Activity Specialist iii iv SEQR NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF A FEIS Date of Notice: June 27, 2018 Lead Agency: New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) Title of Action: Adoption and Implementation of a Master Plan for Taconic State Park SEQR Status: Type I Location of Action: Taconic State Park is located in the Towns of Copake and Ancram in Columbia County, NY, and Town of Northeast in Dutchess County, NY. This Notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law. A Final Master Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) on the proposed action has been prepared and accepted by OPRHP. The Final Master Plan and FEIS describe the proposed action, the environmental setting, alternatives and potential environmental impacts and mitigation, and the agency’s responses to comments on the Draft Plan/DEIS. Agencies and the public are afforded the opportunity to consider the FEIS. This consideration period ends on Monday, July 9, 2018. Copies of the Final Master Plan/FEIS are available for review at the Taconic State Park office; at the offices of the agency contacts; and the Roeliff Jansen Community Library, 9091 Route 22, Hillsdale, NY 12529, and NorthEast – Millerton Public Library, 75 Main Street, Millerton, New York 12546. The online version of the Master Plan and FEIS are available at the following publicly accessible website: http://www.nysparks.state.ny.us/inside-our-agency/master-plans.aspx. Agency Contacts: Linda Cooper, AICP, Regional Director Sara Hart, Park Planner Taconic Region, NYS OPRHP NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and PO Box 308 Historic Preservation 9 Old Post Road Albany, NY 12238 Staatsburg, NY 12580 (518) 474 - 6703 (845) 889-3811 v vi Taconic State Park Environmental Impact Statement: Table of Contents Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... iii Appendices .................................................................................................................................................. xi Abbreviations and Acronyms Used ............................................................................................................. xiii Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... xv Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. xv Location and Access ............................................................................................................................... xv Park Boundaries ..................................................................................................................................... xv Adjacent Land Uses ................................................................................................................................ xv Recreational Needs Assessment............................................................................................................ xvi Economic Contribution ............................................................................................................................ xvi Designations and Partnerships ............................................................................................................... xvi Legal Considerations .............................................................................................................................. xvi Programs ................................................................................................................................................ xvi Natural Resources .................................................................................................................................. xvi Physical Resources ............................................................................................................................ xvi Ecological Communities, Flora, and Fauna ...................................................................................... xvii Cultural Resources ................................................................................................................................ xvii Scenic Resources .................................................................................................................................. xvii Recreational Resources/Activities ........................................................................................................ xviii Operations and Maintenance Overview ............................................................................................... xviii Agency Mission and Taconic State Park Vision Statement .................................................................. xviii Agency Mission Statement ............................................................................................................... xviii Taconic State Park Vision Statement ............................................................................................... xviii Development of Alternatives ................................................................................................................... xix Strategies for Natural and Cultural Resource Protection ................................................................... xix Strategies for Recreational Resource Development .......................................................................... xix Strategies for Operations and Facility Resources .............................................................................. xx Identification of the Preferred Alternative ............................................................................................... xxi The Master Plan...................................................................................................................................... xxi Environmental Impacts and Mitigation .................................................................................................... xxi Chapter 1 – Environmental Setting ............................................................................................................... 1 Location and Access ................................................................................................................................. 1 Park Boundaries ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Adjacent Land Uses .................................................................................................................................. 1 Socio-economic Characteristics ............................................................................................................... 1 Recreational Needs Assessment.............................................................................................................. 2 Economic Contribution .............................................................................................................................. 3 vii Taconic State Park Environmental Impact Statement: Table of Contents Designations and Partnerships ................................................................................................................. 3 Programs .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Legal Considerations ................................................................................................................................ 5 Natural Resources .................................................................................................................................... 5 Geology ...............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Covered in Phylloboletellus and Numerous Clamps in Boletellus Fibuliger
    PERSOONIA Published by the Rijksherbarium, Leiden Volume 11, Part 3, pp. 269-302 (1981) Notes on bolete taxonomy—III Rolf Singer Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, U.S.A. have Contributions involving bolete taxonomy during the last ten years not only widened the knowledge and increased the number of species in the boletes and related lamellate and gastroid forms, but have also introduced a large number of of new data on characters useful for the generic and subgeneric taxonomy these is therefore timely to fungi,resulting, in part, in new taxonomical arrangements. It consider these new data with a view to integratingthem into an amended classifi- cation which, ifit pretends to be natural must take into account all observations of possible diagnostic value. It must also take into account all sufficiently described species from all phytogeographic regions. 1. Clamp connections Like any other character (including the spore print color), the presence or absence ofclamp connections in is neither in of the carpophores here nor other groups Basidiomycetes necessarily a generic or family character. This situation became very clear when occasional clamps were discovered in Phylloboletellus and numerous clamps in Boletellus fibuliger. Kiihner (1978-1980) rightly postulates that cytology and sexuality should be considered wherever at all possible. This, as he is well aware, is not feasible in most boletes, and we must be content to judgeclamp-occurrence per se, giving it importance wherever associated with other characters and within a well circumscribed and obviously homogeneous group such as Phlebopus, Paragyrodon, and Gyrodon. (Heinemann (1954) and Pegler & Young this is (1981) treat group on the family level.) Gyroporus, also clamp-bearing, considered close, but somewhat more removed than the other genera.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Overview of Aureoboletus (Boletaceae, Boletales), with Descriptions of Six New Species from China
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal MycoKeys 61: 111–145 (2019) The Aureoboletus in China 111 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.61.47520 REVIEW ARTICLE MycoKeys http://mycokeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Phylogenetic overview of Aureoboletus (Boletaceae, Boletales), with descriptions of six new species from China Ming Zhang1, Tai-Hui Li1, Chao-Qun Wang1, Nian-Kai Zeng2, Wang-Qiu Deng1 1 State Key Laboratory of Applied Microbiology Southern China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Microbial Culture Collection and Application, Guangdong Institute of Microbiology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510070, China 2 Department of Pharmacy, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 571101, China Corresponding author: Tai-Hui Li ([email protected]) Academic editor: M. P. Martín | Received 23 October 2019 | Accepted 29 November 2019 | Published 17 December 2019 Citation: Zhang M, Li T-H, Wang C-Q, Zeng N-K, Deng W-Q (2019)Phylogenetic overview of Aureoboletus (Boletaceae, Boletales), with descriptions of six new species from China. MycoKeys 61: 111–145. https://doi. org/10.3897/mycokeys.61.47520 Abstract In this study, species relationships of the genus Aureoboletus were studied, based on both morphological characteristics and a four-gene (nrLSU, tef1-a, rpb1 and rpb2) phylogenetic inference. Thirty-five species of the genus have been revealed worldwide, forming eight major clades in the phylogenetic tree, of which twenty-four species have been found in China, including six new species: A. glutinosus, A. griseorufescens, A. raphanaceus, A. sinobadius, A. solus, A. velutipes and a new combination A. miniatoaurantiacus (Bi & Loh) Ming Zhang, N.K. Zeng & T.H. Li proposed here.
    [Show full text]
  • Where to Bird in Dutchess County, 3Rd Edition
    WHERE TO BIRD IN DUTCHESS COUNTY Edited by Stan DeOrsey and Adrienne Popko Third Edition Published by The Ralph T. Waterman Bird Club, Inc. Dutchess County, New York January 1, 2016 Photos by Adrienne Popko Copyright 1990, 2016 by Ralph T. Waterman Bird Club, all rights reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 Andrew Haight Road 35 Pawling Nature Reserve 7 Bowdoin Park 36 Pond Gut 8 Brace Mountain 37 Poughkeepsie Rural Cemetery 9 Buttercup Farm Wildlife S. 38 Reese Sanctuary 10 Cary Arboretum 39 Rockefeller / Pitcher Lane 11 Cascade Mountain Road 40 Saw Kill & South Bay Trails 12 Cruger Island 41 Skunks Misery Road 13 Deep Hollow Road 42 S. Quaker Hill / Tower Hill Rds 14 Depot Hill MUA 43 Stissing Mountain MUA 15 Edward R Murrow Park 44 Stony Kill Farm Env Ed Center 16 Eleanor Roosevelt NHS 45 Sylvan Lake / Clove Road 17 Ferncliff Forest 46 Taconic-Hereford MUA 18 Flint Hill / Huckleberry Roads 47 Taconic State Park 19 Freedom Park 48 Tamarack Lake & Swamp 20 Home of Franklin Roosevelt NHS 49 Tamarack Preserve 21 Hudson Highlands State Park 50 Thompson Pond Preserve 22 Hudson River - North 51 Tivoli Bays WMA 24 Hudson River - South 52 Tower Hill Road lnnisfree26 53 Tracy Road 27 James Baird State Park 54 Tymor Park 28 Lafayetteville MUA 55 Vanderbilt Mansion NHS 29 Lake Oniad 56 Vassar College 30 Locust Grove Historic Estate 57 Vassar College Farm 31 Millbrook School 58 Wappinger Lake 32 Montgomery Place 59 Wassaic MUA 33 Ogden Mills & Norrie State Park 60 Wilcox Park 34 Oriole Mills / Norton / Yantz Rds - 2 - CROSS REFERENCE OF LOCAL NAMES Many areas in Dutchess County are commonly known by names other than those used in this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Forest Pests and Diseases in Protected Areas of Georgia Final Report
    Assessment of Forest Pests and Diseases in Protected Areas of Georgia Final report Dr. Iryna Matsiakh Tbilisi 2014 This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The content, findings, interpretations, and conclusions of this publication are the sole responsibility of the FLEG II (ENPI East) Programme Team (www.enpi-fleg.org) and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Implementing Organizations. CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES ............................................................................................................................. 3 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................... 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Background information ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Literature review ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Results and Discussion ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Appendix 3. Thousand Islands National Park Taxonomy Report
    Appendix 3. Thousand Islands National Park Taxonomy Report Class Order Family Genus Species Arachnida Araneae Agelenidae Agelenopsis Agelenopsis potteri Agelenopsis utahana Anyphaenidae Anyphaena Anyphaena celer Hibana Hibana gracilis Araneidae Araneus Araneus bicentenarius Larinioides Larinioides cornutus Larinioides patagiatus Clubionidae Clubiona Clubiona abboti Clubiona bishopi Clubiona canadensis Clubiona kastoni Clubiona obesa Clubiona pygmaea Elaver Elaver excepta Corinnidae Castianeira Castianeira cingulata Phrurolithus Phrurolithus festivus Dictynidae Emblyna Emblyna cruciata Emblyna sublata Eutichuridae Strotarchus Strotarchus piscatorius Gnaphosidae Herpyllus Herpyllus ecclesiasticus Zelotes Zelotes hentzi Linyphiidae Ceraticelus Ceraticelus atriceps 1 Collinsia Collinsia plumosa Erigone Erigone atra Hypselistes Hypselistes florens Microlinyphia Microlinyphia mandibulata Neriene Neriene radiata Soulgas Soulgas corticarius Spirembolus Lycosidae Pardosa Pardosa milvina Pardosa moesta Piratula Piratula canadensis Mimetidae Mimetus Mimetus notius Philodromidae Philodromus Philodromus peninsulanus Philodromus rufus vibrans Philodromus validus Philodromus vulgaris Thanatus Thanatus striatus Phrurolithidae Phrurotimpus Phrurotimpus borealis Pisauridae Dolomedes Dolomedes tenebrosus Dolomedes triton Pisaurina Pisaurina mira Salticidae Eris Eris militaris Hentzia Hentzia mitrata Naphrys Naphrys pulex Pelegrina Pelegrina proterva Tetragnathidae Tetragnatha 2 Tetragnatha caudata Tetragnatha shoshone Tetragnatha straminea Tetragnatha viridis
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Microlepidoptera in Alberta, Canada
    Volume 59 2005 Number 2 Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 59(2), 2005, 61-82 NEW RECORDS OF MICROLEPIDOPTERA IN ALBERTA, CANADA GREGORY R. POHL Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320 - 122 St., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 3S5 email: [email protected] CHARLES D. BIRD Box 22, Erskine, Alberta, Canada T0C 1G0 email: [email protected] JEAN-FRANÇOIS LANDRY Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Ave, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 email: [email protected] AND GARY G. ANWEILER E.H. Strickland Entomology Museum, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2H1 email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Fifty-seven species of microlepidoptera are reported as new for the Province of Alberta, based primarily on speci- mens in the Northern Forestry Research Collection of the Canadian Forest Service, the University of Alberta Strickland Museum, the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes, and the personal collections of the first two authors. These new records are in the families Eriocraniidae, Prodoxidae, Tineidae, Psychidae, Gracillariidae, Ypsolophidae, Plutellidae, Acrolepi- idae, Glyphipterigidae, Elachistidae, Glyphidoceridae, Coleophoridae, Gelechiidae, Xyloryctidae, Sesiidae, Tortricidae, Schrecken- steiniidae, Epermeniidae, Pyralidae, and Crambidae. These records represent the first published report of the families Eriocrani- idae and Glyphidoceridae in Alberta, of Acrolepiidae in western Canada, and of Schreckensteiniidae in Canada. Tetragma gei, Tegeticula
    [Show full text]
  • Special Permit Application
    SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION CATAMOUNT SKI RESORT, LLC Catamount Mountain Resort 17 Nicholson Road South Egremont, Massachusetts February 25, 2020 CATAMOUNT SKI RESORT SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION INDEX & PROFESSIONAL TEAM Exhibit A Town of Egremont Zoning Board of Appeals Application Exhibit B Zoning Application Narrative Exhibit C Proposed Special Permit Conditions Exhibit D July 25, 2019 Floor Plan Exhibit E October 3, 2019 Catamount Ski Resort Plot Plan Exhibit F September 18, 2018 Building Permit Exhibit G September 6, 2019 Amended Building Permit Exhibit H Temporary Certificate of Occupancy Exhibit I Abutter’s List Exhibit J Assessor Cards CATAMOUNT TEAM Owner: Jonathan C. Schaefer, Manager CATAMOUNT SKI RESORT, LLC 17 Nicholson Road South Egremont, MA 01258 Telephone Number: (802) 349-8223 [email protected] Civil Engineers / Planners: Attorney: James Scalise, Professional Engineer William E. Martin, Esq. SK DESIGN GROUP, INC MARTIN & OLIVEIRA, LLP 2 Federico Drive 75 South Church Street, Suite 550 Pittsfield, MA 01201 Pittsfield, MA 01201 Telephone Number: (413) 443-3537 Telephone Number: (413) 443-6455 [email protected] [email protected] Special Permit Project Narrative Catamount Ski Area 17 Nicholson Road South Egremont, Massachusetts SECTION 1.0: Introduction Project Overview This Project Narrative is submitted in support of a Special Permit Application for Catamount Ski Resort, LLC’s (“Catamount Ski Resort”) proposed expansion of summertime activities and uses of Catamount Ski Area. The application is submitted in accordance with the Town of Egremont Zoning Bylaws. Existing Site Description The property is a developed ski area, which has been in existence for almost 80 years. This includes several buildings, gravel and paved driveways and parking areas, utilities and ski trails.
    [Show full text]
  • Moth Checklist Pagemaker
    thePembrokeAreaFieldNaturalists presents a MothChecklist of central Renfrew County, Ontario compiled by Jason J. Dombroskie ©chris michener February 2003 Checklist of Moths of the Pembroke Area Field Naturalists Compiled by Jason J. Dombroskie. Status: VR = very rare, R = rare, U = uncommon, C = common Scientific Name Common Name status Family Hepialidae Ghost Moths Sthenopis argenteomaculatus (Harris) Silver-spotted Ghost Moth U Sthenopis quadriguttatus (Grote) Four-spotted Ghost Moth U Family Nepticulidae Minute Eye-cap Moths Ectoedemia populella Busck Poplar Petiolegall Moth C Ectoedemia ulmella (Braun) C Glaucolepis saccharella (Braun) Stigmella corylifoliella (Clemens) U Stigmella saginella (Clemens) R Family Heliozelidae Shield Bearer Moths Antispila freemani Lafontaine R Family Adelidae Fairy Moths Adela purpurea Walker Willow Fairy Moth U Family Incurvariidae Leafcutter Moths Paraclemensia acerifoliella (Fitch) Maple Leafcutter C Family Tineidae Fungus Moths Eccritothrix trimaculella (Chambers) R Nemapogon granella (Linnaeus) R Family Gracillariidae Leaf Miner Moths Caloptilia fraxinella (Ely) Privet Leaf Miner C Caloptilia invariabilis (Braun) Cherry Leafcone Caterpillar C Caloptilia near stigmatella (Fabricus) C Caloptilia umbratella (Braun) R Parornix crataegifoliella (Clemens) R Parornix inusitatumella (Chambers) R Phyllonorycter aeriferella (Clemens) R Phyllonorycter argentifimbriella (Clemens) R Phyllonorycter basistrigella (Clemens) R Phyllonorycter lucetiella (Clemens) Basswood Squareblotch Miner U Phyllonorycter ostryaefoliella
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 L O N G I S L a N D M O U N T a I N E E R Newsletter of The
    LONG ISLAND MOUNTAINEER Newsletter Of The Adirondack Mountain Club,Long Island Chapter SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER i9ss Linda Edwards Editor's Desk THE NOMINATIONS ARE IN The next two months provide the best outing conditions of the year! The Nominating Committee is pre­ There are no bugs, the weather is senting the following slate of can­ mild and nature dons its fall didates for the upcoming year. The colors. names will be placed in nomination The Outings Committee has made during the September meeting and an extra special effort to present voted on during the November meet­ a great array of offerings ( see ing. The Paul Eanzillotta, Ray •• pages 6 and 7). Get out as often as .(eardon and Al Scholl served on the you can. It's the years best season: Nominating Committee. As you are reading this, I'm probably just getting back from my President-— Allen Scholl trip to Colorado and Arizona. I Vice-President - Jim Pelzer thought it was well deserved as I Treasurer - Tom V/all finished the ADK 46ers on July 16 Governor - Herb Coles. on Panther Mt. in the Santanonis. Board of Directors - Larry Braun I'd like to thank my enthusiastic - Bob Young sherpa, Dave, for helping me cele­ - Stan Weiss brate. I'd also like to thank every­ one who hiked all those peaks with As of this writing, the Secre­ me, as I couldn't have done it with­ tary position has not been filled. out you. The Nominating Committee is still I'd like to encourage those who searching for one.
    [Show full text]
  • E Sixth Annual Berkshire Symphonic Festival
    STEINWAY THE INSTRUMENT OF THE IMMORTALS The Enchanted Hour! Who has not known those fragile, mystic interludes when all the world seems good, and hope is bright? They are a real and deepening part of life. And music of all the arts can best evoke such moods. A clear voice singing . some dark and haunting air . these have an unexampled power to stir the heart . Music belongs to every age. It is instinctive in the child. It fires the gayety of youth. In later life it is a constant inspiration and delight. And to all, even the least accomplished, music offers solace, joy, escape . moments of enchantment which nothing can dispel. Music and the Steinway piano . enjoyment of them is not limited by ability or circumstance. Because the Steinway is primarily a piano for the Home . and for that home which must regard any expenditure with care. Considering the excel- lence of this instrument the price is small, for it will last for generations. Come to the Steinway rooms; play, listen; the excellence of the Steinway will impress you deeply. *THE NEW STEINWAY GRAND PIANO in EBONIZED FINISH is ONLY *THE NEW STEINWAY PIANINO s ONLY This exquisite instrument is a full-scale $50 Liberal terms on all new Steinways .$885 vertical piano-7 gaoctaves. Amazing tone — direct action — craftsman construction. Used pianos accepted in part payment. Mahogany, $550 Walnut, $575 STEINWAY HALL STEINWAY & SONS 109 WEST 57th STREET, NEW YORK, N. Y. REPRESENTED IN MASSACHUSETTS AND NEW HAMPSHIRE BY M. STEINERT & SONS CO../, In c. SPRINGFIELD BOSTON WORCESTER 162 Boylston Street 1217 Main Street 308 Main Street E SIXTH ANNUAL BERKSHIRE SYMPHONIC FESTIVAL THE BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA SERGE KOUSSEVITZKY, Conductor SERIES A Thursday, August 3, 8.30 p.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Ectomycorrhizal Fungi in Minnesota's Ancient and Younger Stands of Red Pine and Northern Hardwood-Conifer Forests
    DIVERSITY OF ECTOMYCORRHIZAL FUNGI IN MINNESOTA'S ANCIENT AND YOUNGER STANDS OF RED PINE AND NORTHERN HARDWOOD-CONIFER FORESTS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY PATRICK ROBERT LEACOCK IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DAVID J. MCLAUGHLIN, ADVISER OCTOBER 1997 DIVERSITY OF ECTOMYCORRHIZAL FUNGI IN MINNESOTA'S ANCIENT AND YOUNGER STANDS OF RED PINE AND NORTHERN HARDWOOD-CONIFER FORESTS COPYRIGHT Patrick Robert Leacock 1997 Saint Paul, Minnesota ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to Dr. David J. McLaughlin for being an admirable adviser, teacher, and editor. I thank Dave for his guidance and insight on this research and for assistance with identifications. I am grateful for the friendship and support of many graduate students, especially Beth Frieders, Becky Knowles, and Bev Weddle, who assisted with research. I thank undergraduate student assistants Dustine Robin and Tom Shay and school teacher participants Dan Bale, Geri Nelson, and Judith Olson. I also thank the faculty and staff of the Department of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, for their assistance and support. I extend my most sincere thanks and gratitude to Judy Kenney and Adele Mehta for their dedication in the field during four years of mushroom counting and tree measuring. I thank Anna Gerenday for her support and help with identifications. I thank Joe Ammirati, Tim Baroni, Greg Mueller, and Clark Ovrebo, for their kind aid with identifications. I am indebted to Rich Baker and Kurt Rusterholz of the Natural Heritage Program, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, for providing the opportunity for this research.
    [Show full text]