Carideorum Catalogus: the Recent Species of the Dendrobranchiate, Stenopodidean, Procarididean and Caridean Shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Carideorum Catalogus: the Recent Species of the Dendrobranchiate, Stenopodidean, Procarididean and Caridean Shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda) Carideorum Catalogus: The Recent Species of the Dendrobranchiate, Stenopodidean, Procarididean and Caridean Shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda) S. De Grave & C.H.J.M. Fransen* De Grave, S. & C.H.J.M. Fransen. Carideorum catalogus: the recent species of the dendrobranchiate, stenopodidean, procarididean and caridean shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda). Zool. Med. Leiden 85(9): 30.ix.2011: 195-589 figs 1-59.— ISSN 0024-0672, ISBN 978-90-6519-200-4. S. De Grave, Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom ([email protected]). C.H.J.M. Fransen, Department of Marine Zoology, Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity Naturalis, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands ([email protected]). * The order of authorship is purely alphabetical, with both authors having equally contributed to this work. Key words: Crustacea; Decapoda; Dendrobranchiata; Stenopodidea; Procarididea; Caridea; checklist. A checklist of recent species of dendrobranchiate, stenopodidean, procarididean and caridean shrimps including synonyms and type localities. Also listed are unavailable names, larval names, nomina dubia and nomina nuda. A complete list of references to original descriptions of taxa listed is provided. Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 196 The higher classification of shrimp .................................................................................................. 196 Fossil taxa ........................................................................................................................................................ 197 How many shrimp species are there? ............................................................................................ 197 Structure of the list ............................................................................................................................................. 197 Notes on type locality ....................................................................................................................................... 199 Notes on dating of some papers ................................................................................................................ 200 Notes on author names .................................................................................................................................... 201 Notes on authorship of taxa ......................................................................................................................... 202 Notes on some papers of nomenclatorial significance ................................................................. 203 Notes on the spelling of some names ..................................................................................................... 204 Notes on the gender of generic names and gender agreement in species names ........ 204 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................................... 205 Checklist ................................................................................................................................................................... 206 Suborder Dendrobranchiata ................................................................................................................ 206 Suborder Pleocyemata ............................................................................................................................. 248 Infraorder Procarididea .......................................................................................................................... 248 Infraorder Stenopodidea ........................................................................................................................ 249 Infraorder Caridea ..................................................................................................................................... 254 Unavailable names ..................................................................................................................................... 471 Penaeoidea Larvata .................................................................................................................................... 471 Penaeoidea Nomina dubia .................................................................................................................... 471 196 De Grave & Fransen. Carideorum catalogus (Crustacea: Decapoda). Zool. Med. Leiden 85 (2011) Penaeoidea Nomina nuda ..................................................................................................................... 472 Sergestoidea Larvata ................................................................................................................................. 472 Sergestoidea Nomina dubia ................................................................................................................. 472 Sergestoidea Nomina nuda .................................................................................................................. 473 Caridea Larvata ............................................................................................................................................ 473 Caridea Nomina dubia ............................................................................................................................ 475 Caridea Nomina nuda ............................................................................................................................. 476 References ................................................................................................................................................................ 478 Systematic index to currently valid families and genera ............................................................ 585 Introduction The higher classification of shrimp Over the last decade or so, much has been written on the classification of Decapoda, fuelled by a surge in molecular phylogenetic studies, as well as close scrutiny of inter- nal and external morphological characteristics. As discussed by Fransen & De Grave (2009), such studies on shrimps are still somewhat ”thin on the ground”, at least com- pared to the more extensive work done on the Brachyura and Anomura. At a higher level in decapod classification it has long been recognised that three distinct lineages of shrimps can be distinguished: Dendrobranchiata, Stenopodidea and Caridea, a system which has not been seriously challenged by recent studies. The internal classification of Dendrobranchiata and Stenopodidea alike has been stable for some time, with the only major addition being the family Macromaxilloca- rididae Alvarez, Iliffe & Villalobos (2006) to the Stenopodidea in recent years. A different picture has emerged for Caridea very recently with Bracken et al. (2009) and Chan et al. (2010), both drawing attention to the non-monophyletic status of certain superfamilies and families. Further, we are aware of work currently in progress (some by the authors of this compilation) corroborating the hypothesis that the current clas- sification of Caridea is unnatural, lines of study which will lead to the resurrection of certain family names as well as further refinement to other families. As one of our objec- tives for the current effort was to link this compilation of species level information with the earlier work by Chace (1992) for families and Holthuis (1993a) for genera, we have elected to largely follow the classification outlined by De Grave et al. (2009) which builds upon this earlier work. As such, it was deemed advisable to include the recently resurrected family Acanthephyridae Spence Bate, 1888 in the superfamily Oplopho- roidea, rather than in this catalogue to create a new superfamily, which would perhaps be more congruent with the results in Chan et al. (2010). Although we follow herein the classification scheme of De Grave et al. (2009), two recent changes have been implemented. The clarification of the status of Galatheacaris abyssalis Vereshchaka, 1997a, as the megalopal stage of Eugonatonotus chacei Chan & Yu, 1991a, by De Grave et al. (2010) resulted in the removal of the family Galatheacarididae and superfamily Galatheacaridoidea in the current listing. Bracken et al. (2010) clarified the status of the family Procarididae, resulting in the recognition of a fourth group of shrimp, Infraorder Procarididea. De Grave & Fransen. Carideorum catalogus (Crustacea: Decapoda). Zool. Med. Leiden 85 (2011) 197 Fossil taxa The current listing is restricted to extant genera, species and subspecies only. For readers interested in how the current classification of extant taxa compares with those of fossil taxa, we refer to De Grave et al. (2009) who employed a suprageneric classifica- tion of Decapoda across both fossil and extant taxa, as well as Schweitzer et al. (2010) who list all species (and their classification) of fossil species. Schweitzer et al. (2010) list 97 fossil species of Dendrobranchiata in 31 genera, two fossil species in Stenopodidae (each in its own genus) and 52 species of fossil Caridea in 33 genera. Their placement of the genus Udora Münster, 1839, within the superfamily Procaridoidea (herein consid- ered at infraordinal level) is interesting, as this group is currently only known from six species, restricted to anchialine habitats. If the five
Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Freshwater Shrimp Species of the Genus Caridina (Decapoda, Caridea, Atyidae) from Dawanshan Island, Guangdong, China, with the Description of a New Species
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 923: 15–32 (2020) Caridina tetrazona 15 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.923.48593 RESEarcH articLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Two freshwater shrimp species of the genus Caridina (Decapoda, Caridea, Atyidae) from Dawanshan Island, Guangdong, China, with the description of a new species Qing-Hua Chen1, Wen-Jian Chen2, Xiao-Zhuang Zheng2, Zhao-Liang Guo2 1 South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Guangzhou 510520, Guangdong Province, China 2 Department of Animal Science, School of Life Science and Enginee- ring, Foshan University, Foshan 528231, Guangdong Province, China Corresponding author: Zhao-Liang Guo ([email protected]) Academic editor: I.S. Wehrtmann | Received 19 November 2019 | Accepted 7 February 2020 | Published 1 April 2020 http://zoobank.org/138A88CC-DF41-437A-BA1A-CB93E3E36D62 Citation: Chen Q-H, Chen W-J, Zheng X-Z, Guo Z-L (2020) Two freshwater shrimp species of the genus Caridina (Decapoda, Caridea, Atyidae) from Dawanshan Island, Guangdong, China, with the description of a new species. ZooKeys 923: 15–32. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.923.48593 Abstract A faunistic and ecological survey was conducted to document the diversity of freshwater atyid shrimps of Dawanshan Island. Two species of Caridina that occur on this island were documented and discussed. One of these, Caridina tetrazona sp. nov. is described and illustrated as new to science. It can be easily distinguished from its congeners based on a combination of characters, which includes a short rostrum, the shape of the endopod of the male first pleopod, the segmental ratios of antennular peduncle and third maxilliped, the slender scaphocerite, and the absence of a median projection on the posterior margin.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genetical and Ecological Diversity of Fresh Water Prawns Macrobrachium Canarae and Caridina Gracilirostris from Kanyakumari Dist., Tamil Nadu, India
    International Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology. ISSN 0974-3073 Volume 2, Number 1 (2011), pp. 23-32 © International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com A Genetical and Ecological Diversity of Fresh Water Prawns Macrobrachium Canarae and Caridina Gracilirostris from Kanyakumari Dist., Tamil Nadu, India Siva Ranjanee S.1 and Mariapan N.2 1Department of Biotechnology, Vels University, Pallavaram, Chennai, India 2Senior Medical Writer, SIRO Clinpharm Pvt. Ltd., Thane (W) 400 607. India E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Fresh water prawns are cultured widely around the world but little is known about the levels and patterns of genetic diversity. This paper reports the RAPD analysis of two species of fresh water prawns of Atydiae and Palaemonidiae family and the genus Macrobrachium and Caridina collected from Kanyakumari district. Specimens are identified using species-specific morphological characteristics. Morphological characters have limitations of describing intra specific genetic diversity as they are polygenic and expressions can be modified by the environment. The advent of molecular technique made possible not only the genetic analysis and also the study of evolutionary relationship. Molecular analysis of the morphologically identified species are done by extracting the DNA from the animal and concentration of DNA is measured using Nanodrop spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 280nm. Further analysis was performed with RAPD (Rapid Amplified Polymorphic DNA) a PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) based technique. It consist of genomic DNA, amplified with randomly constructed oligonucleotides. Specific quantity of extracted DNA was then amplified by multiplex PCR using random primers and 16S rRNA gene products was then analyzed using a bioanalyzer.
    [Show full text]
  • W7192e19.Pdf
    click for previous page 952 Shrimps and Prawns Sicyoniidae SICYONIIDAE Rock shrimps iagnostic characters: Body generally Drobust, with shell very hard, of “stony” grooves appearance; abdomen often with deep grooves and numerous tubercles. Rostrum well developed and extending beyond eyes, always bearing more than 3 upper teeth (in- cluding those on carapace); base of eyestalk with styliform projection on inner surface, but without tubercle on inner border. Both upper and lower antennular flagella of similar length, attached to tip of antennular peduncle. 1 Carapace lacks both postorbital and postantennal spines, cervical groove in- distinct or absent. Exopod present only on first maxilliped. All 5 pairs of legs well devel- 2 oped, fourth leg bearing a single well-devel- 3rd and 4th pleopods 4 single-branched oped arthrobranch (hidden beneath 3 carapace). In males, endopod of second pair 5 of pleopods (abdominal appendages) with appendix masculina only. Third and fourth pleopods single-branched. Telson generally armed with a pair of fixed lateral spines. Colour: body colour varies from dark brown to reddish; often with distinct spots or colour markings on carapace and/or abdomen - such colour markings are specific and very useful in distinguishing the species. Habitat, biology, and fisheries: All members of this family are marine and can be found from shallow to deep waters (to depths of more than 400 m). They are all benthic and occur on both soft and hard bottoms. Their sizes are generally small, about 2 to 8 cm, but some species can reach a body length over 15 cm. The sexes are easily distinguished by the presence of a large copulatory organ (petasma) on the first pair of pleopods of males, while the females have the posterior thoracic sternites modified into a large sperm receptacle process (thelycum) which holds the spermatophores or sperm sacs (usually whitish or yellowish in colour) after mating.
    [Show full text]
  • The Species Flocks in the Ancient Lakes of Sulawesi, Indonesia
    12 Aquatic biodiversity hotspots in Wallacea: the species fl ocks in the ancient lakes of Sulawesi, Indonesia T h o m a s v o n R i n t e l e n , K r i s t i n a v o n R i n t e l e n , M a t t h i a s G l a u b r e c h t , C h r i s t o p h D . S c h u b a r t a n d F a b i a n H e r d e r 12.1 Introduction Some of the world’s most spectacular species radiations or species fl ocks are found in so-called ‘ancient lakes’. Th ese are long-lived lakes that have existed for 100 000 years (Gorthner et al. 1994 , but see also Albrecht and Wilke 2008 ) or more (e.g. Lake Tanganyika and Lake Baikal). Ancient lakes are justifi ably regarded as hotspots of diversifi cation (e.g. Martens 1997 , Rossiter and Kawanabe 2000 ), even if not all ancient lake species fl ocks match the diversity of the super-fl ock of East African cichlids (e.g. Kornfi eld and Smith 2000 , Kocher 2004 ). Studies on the evo- lution of ancient lake organisms have continuously resulted in important insights into general patterns of speciation and radiation (e.g. Streelman and Danley 2003 ) ever since the seminal review of Brooks ( 1950 ). During the last decade, smaller ancient lakes (c. <1 000 km 2 ), which are generally less well investigated, have attracted increasing attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Sea Fisheries in Mersin Bay, Turkey, Eastern Mediterranean: Diversity and Abundance of Shrimps and Benthic Fish Fauna
    ACTA ZOOLOGICA BULGARICA Applied Zoology Acta zool. bulg., 70 (2), 2018: 259-268 Research Article Deep Sea Fisheries in Mersin Bay, Turkey, Eastern Mediterranean: Diversity and Abundance of Shrimps and Benthic Fish Fauna Yusuf Kenan Bayhan 1* , Deniz Ergüden 2 & Joan E. Cartes 3 1Fisheries Department, Kahta Vocational School, Adiyaman University, 02400, Kahta, Adiyaman, Turkey; E-mail: [email protected] 2Marine Science and Technology Faculty, Iskenderun Technical University, 31220, Iskenderun-Hatay, Turkey; E-mail: [email protected] 3ICM-CSIC Institut de Ciencies del Mar, Passeig Maritim de la Barceloneta 3-49, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: This study was carried out by trawling at depths between 300-601 m in the Mersin Bay (Eastern Mediter - ranean) between May and June 2014. Seven shrimp species ( Aristaeomorpha foliacea , Aristeus antenna - tus , Parapenaeus longirostris , Plesionika edwardsii , Plesionika martia , Pasiphae sivado and Pontocaris lacazei ) were collected as a result of ten trawl operations with a commercial bottom trawl. The most abundant species were P. longirostris (52.06%), A. foliacea (35.64%) and P. edwardsii (9.50%), represent - ing 97.20% of all captured shrimps. The catch per unit eort (CPUE) ranged from 3.094 kg/h to 9.251 kg/h, with an average value of 5.44 ± 2.01 kg/h for shrimps. A total of 37 sh species (28 teleosts and nine elasmobranchs) were captured. The prevailing sh species in catches were Chlorophthalmus agassizi , Merluccius merluccius and Etmopterus spinax in terms of biomass and Helicolenus dactylopterus , Hoplo - stethus mediterraneus , Trachurus trachurus and Lepidopus caudatus in terms of abundance.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklists of Crustacea Decapoda from the Canary and Cape Verde Islands, with an Assessment of Macaronesian and Cape Verde Biogeographic Marine Ecoregions
    Zootaxa 4413 (3): 401–448 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4413.3.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2DF9255A-7C42-42DA-9F48-2BAA6DCEED7E Checklists of Crustacea Decapoda from the Canary and Cape Verde Islands, with an assessment of Macaronesian and Cape Verde biogeographic marine ecoregions JOSÉ A. GONZÁLEZ University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, i-UNAT, Campus de Tafira, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]. ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8584-6731. Abstract The complete list of Canarian marine decapods (last update by González & Quiles 2003, popular book) currently com- prises 374 species/subspecies, grouped in 198 genera and 82 families; whereas the Cape Verdean marine decapods (now fully listed for the first time) are represented by 343 species/subspecies with 201 genera and 80 families. Due to changing environmental conditions, in the last decades many subtropical/tropical taxa have reached the coasts of the Canary Islands. Comparing the carcinofaunal composition and their biogeographic components between the Canary and Cape Verde ar- chipelagos would aid in: validating the appropriateness in separating both archipelagos into different ecoregions (Spalding et al. 2007), and understanding faunal movements between areas of benthic habitat. The consistency of both ecoregions is here compared and validated by assembling their decapod crustacean checklists, analysing their taxa composition, gath- ering their bathymetric data, and comparing their biogeographic patterns. Four main evidences (i.e. different taxa; diver- gent taxa composition; different composition of biogeographic patterns; different endemicity rates) support that separation, especially in coastal benthic decapods; and these parametres combined would be used as a valuable tool at comparing biotas from oceanic archipelagos.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Behaviour of Deep-Sea Benthopelagic Fauna Observed Using Towed Cameras in the Santa Maria Di Leuca Cold-Water Coral Province
    Vol. 443: 95–110, 2011 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published December 20 doi: 10.3354/meps09432 Mar Ecol Prog Ser OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Distribution and behaviour of deep-sea benthopelagic fauna observed using towed cameras in the Santa Maria di Leuca cold-water coral province G. D’Onghia1, A. Indennidate1, A. Giove1, A. Savini2, F. Capezzuto1, L. Sion1, A. Vertino2, P. Maiorano1 1Department of Biology, University of Bari, Via E. Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy 2Department of Geological Science and Geotechnology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 4, 20126 Milano, Italy ABSTRACT: Using a towed camera system, a total of 422 individuals belonging to 62 taxa (includ- ing 33 identified species) were counted in the Santa Maria di Leuca (SML) coral province (Mediterranean Sea). Our findings update the knowledge of the biodiversity of this area and of the depth records of several species. The presence of coral mounds mostly in the north-eastern sector of the SML coral province seems to influence the large scale distribution of the deep-sea ben- thopelagic fauna, playing the role of attraction-refuge with respect to the barren muddy bottoms where fishing occurs in northern areas. Multiple Correspondence Analysis identified 3 main taxa groups: (1) rather strictly linked to the bottom, resting or moving on the seabed, often sheltering and feeding; (2) mostly swimming in the water column and mostly observed on rugged bottoms; and (3) actively swimming or hovering near the seabed. The behavioural patterns largely related to activity and position of the fauna seem to determine their small-scale distribution. The effects of different benthic macrohabitats appear to be less important and the depth within the bathymetric range examined even less so.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Origin of Type IV Classical Cadherins in Arthropods Mizuki Sasaki1,4, Yasuko Akiyama-Oda1,2 and Hiroki Oda1,3*
    Sasaki et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2017) 17:142 DOI 10.1186/s12862-017-0991-2 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Evolutionary origin of type IV classical cadherins in arthropods Mizuki Sasaki1,4, Yasuko Akiyama-Oda1,2 and Hiroki Oda1,3* Abstract Background: Classical cadherins are a metazoan-specific family of homophilic cell-cell adhesion molecules that regulate morphogenesis. Type I and type IV cadherins in this family function at adherens junctions in the major epithelial tissues of vertebrates and insects, respectively, but they have distinct, relatively simple domain organizations that are thought to have evolved by independent reductive changes from an ancestral type III cadherin, which is larger than derived paralogs and has a complicated domain organization. Although both type III and type IV cadherins have been identified in hexapods and branchiopods, the process by which the type IV cadherin evolved is still largely unclear. Results: Through an analysis of arthropod genome sequences, we found that the only classical cadherin encoded in chelicerate genomes was the type III cadherin and that the two type III cadherin genes found in the spider Parasteatoda tepidariorum genome exhibited a complex yet ancestral exon-intron organization in arthropods. Genomic and transcriptomic data from branchiopod, copepod, isopod, amphipod, and decapod crustaceans led us to redefine the type IV cadherin category, which we separated into type IVa and type IVb, which displayed a similar domain organization, except type IVb cadherins have a larger number of extracellular cadherin (EC) domainsthandotypeIVacadherins (nine versus seven). We also showed that type IVa cadherin genes occurred in the hexapod, branchiopod, and copepod genomes whereas only type IVb cadherin genes were present in malacostracans.Furthermore,comparative characterization of the type IVb cadherins suggested that the presence of two extra EC domains in their N-terminal regions represented primitive characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudodrobna Natator N. Comb., a New Link Between Crustacean Faunas from the Jurassic of Germany and Cretaceous of Lebanon
    geodiversitas 2021 43 8 DIRECTEUR DE LA PUBLICATION / PUBLICATION DIRECTOR : Bruno David, Président du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle RÉDACTEUR EN CHEF / EDITOR-IN-CHIEF : Didier Merle ASSISTANT DE RÉDACTION / ASSISTANT EDITOR : Emmanuel Côtez ([email protected]) MISE EN PAGE / PAGE LAYOUT : Emmanuel Côtez COMITÉ SCIENTIFIQUE / SCIENTIFIC BOARD : Christine Argot (Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris) Beatrix Azanza (Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid) Raymond L. Bernor (Howard University, Washington DC) Alain Blieck (chercheur CNRS retraité, Haubourdin) Henning Blom (Uppsala University) Jean Broutin (Sorbonne Université, Paris, retraité) Gaël Clément (Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris) Ted Daeschler (Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphie) Bruno David (Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris) Gregory D. Edgecombe (The Natural History Museum, Londres) Ursula Göhlich (Natural History Museum Vienna) Jin Meng (American Museum of Natural History, New York) Brigitte Meyer-Berthaud (CIRAD, Montpellier) Zhu Min (Chinese Academy of Sciences, Pékin) Isabelle Rouget (Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris) Sevket Sen (Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, retraité) Stanislav Štamberg (Museum of Eastern Bohemia, Hradec Králové) Paul Taylor (The Natural History Museum, Londres, retraité) COUVERTURE / COVER : Réalisée à partir des Figures de l’article/Made from the Figures of the article. Geodiversitas est indexé dans / Geodiversitas is indexed in: – Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch®) – ISI
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Larval Development of the Rock Shrimp Rhynchocinetes Typus
    Revista Chilena de Historia Natural ISSN: 0716-078X [email protected] Sociedad de Biología de Chile Chile DUPRÉ, ENRIQUE; FLORES, LUIS; PALMA, SERGIO Larval development of the rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus Milne Edwards, 1937 (Decapoda, Caridea) reared in the laboratory Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, vol. 81, núm. 2, 2008, pp. 155-170 Sociedad de Biología de Chile Santiago, Chile Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=369944286001 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LARVAL DEVELOPMENT OF RHYNCHOCINETES TYPUSRevista Chilena de Historia Natural155 81: 155-170, 2008 Larval development of the rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus Milne Edwards, 1937 (Decapoda, Caridea) reared in the laboratory Desarrollo larval del camarón de roca Rhynchocinetes typus Milne Edwards, 1937 (Decapoda, Caridea) cultivados en laboratorio ENRIQUE DUPRÉ1*, LUIS FLORES1 & SERGIO PALMA2 1 Departamento de Biología Marina, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad Católica del Norte, Casilla117 Coquimbo, Chile; [email protected] 2 Escuela de Ciencias del Mar, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile *e-mail for correspondence: [email protected] ABSTRACT The first description of the larval stages of a representative of the family Rhynchocinetidae from the southeastern Pacific coast of South America is presented. Larvae of the rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus, from rocky subtidal environment of the Chile-Peru coast were reared in the laboratory at 22 ºC, salinity 32 and feeding with Artemia franciscana. Seven zoeal stages, which occur through 10 successive moults, are described and illustrated in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea, Decapoda, Dendrobranchiata and Caridea) from Off Northeastern Japan
    Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci., Ser. A, 42(1), pp. 23–48, February 22, 2016 Additional Records of Deep-water Shrimps (Crustacea, Decapoda, Dendrobranchiata and Caridea) from off Northeastern Japan Tomoyuki Komai1 and Hironori Komatsu2 1 Natural History Museum and Institute, Chiba, 955–2 Aoba-cho, Chiba 260–8682, Japan E-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Zoology, National Museum of Nature and Science, 4–1–1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–0005, Japan E-mail: [email protected] (Received 5 October 2015; accepted 22 December 2015) Abstract Four deep-water species of shrimps are newly recorded from off Tohoku District, northeastern Japan: Hepomadus gracialis Spence Bate, 1888 (Dendrobranchiata, Aristeidae), Pasiphaea exilimanus Komai, Lin and Chan, 2012 (Caridea, Pasiphaeidae), Nematocarcinus longirostris Spence Bate, 1888 (Caridea, Nematocarcinidae), and Glyphocrangon caecescens Anonymous, 1891 (Caridea, Glyphocrangonidae). Of them, the bathypelagic P. exilimanus is new to the Japanese fauna. The other three species are abyssobenthic, extending to depths greater than 3000 m, and thus have been rarely collected. The newly collected samples of H. gracialis enable us to reassess diagnostic characters of the species. Nematocarcinus longirostris is rediscovered since the original description, and the taxonomy of the species is reviewed. Glyphocrangon caecescens is the sole representative of the family extending to off northern Japan. Key words : Hepomadus gracialis, Pasiphaea exilimanus, Nematocarcinus longirostris, Glypho- crangon caecescens,
    [Show full text]