DOCSLIB.ORG

Eastern Partnership Regional Transport Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eastern Partnership Regional Transport Study Eastern Partnership regional transport study TRACECA IDEAJune II 2015 Annex I – Data Collection P a g e | 1 Transport Dialogue and THIS PROJECT IS FUNDED BY THE EU Networks Interoperability II Eastern Partnership regional transport study Final report Annex I – Data collection June 2015 This document is prepared by the IDEA II Project. The IDEA II Project is implemented by TRT Trasporti e Territorio in association with: Panteia Group, Dornier Consulting GmbH and Lutsk University Eastern Partnership regional transport study June 2015 Annex I – Data Collection P a g e | 2 TABLE OF CONTENT 1 ANNEX I – DATA COLLECTION ............................................................................................... 3 1.1 Approach .................................................................................................................. 3 1.1.1. Indicators ..............................................................................................................3 1.1.2. Data coverage ......................................................................................................4 2 DATA COLLECTED THROUGH NATIONAL ADMINISTRATIONS AND OFFICIAL SOURCES ............................. 7 2.1 Templates ................................................................................................................. 8 2.1.1. Road template ......................................................................................................8 2.1.2. Rail template ..................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Sources ................................................................................................................... 16 2.2.1. Road ................................................................................................................... 16 2.2.2. Railways ............................................................................................................. 16 3 DATA COLLECTED THROUGH DIRECT ROAD SURVEYS .................................................................. 18 3.1 Ukraine ................................................................................................................... 18 3.1.1. Survey on road quality ....................................................................................... 18 3.2 Belarus .................................................................................................................... 20 3.2.1. Survey on road quality ....................................................................................... 20 3.2.2. Traffic counts ..................................................................................................... 21 3.3 Armenia .................................................................................................................. 23 3.3.1. Survey on road quality ....................................................................................... 23 3.3.2. Traffic counts ..................................................................................................... 25 Eastern Partnership regional transport study June 2015 Annex I – Data Collection P a g e | 3 1 ANNEX I – DATA COLLECTION 1.1 APPROACH Data collection for the EaP regional transport study was based on two main approaches: The first one encompassed the active involvement of the IDEA country experts and EaP Transport Panel experts. The second one encompassed the execution by the IDEA II project team of direct survey on road conditions for Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova and road traffic counts in Belarus and Armenia. Both approaches are described in the sections below. 1.1.1. INDICATORS Data collection encompassed a first preparatory stage performed by the IDEA II project team which covered the identification of key infrastructure and traffic flows indicators to be collected for each transport mode. The list of indicators to be collected for rails and roads belonging to the EaP strategic network was developed following the indications received from DG MOVE and refined on the basis of indicators used by TEN-Tec. The final list of indicators, further refined on March 2015 according to the request of DG MOVE, is reported below. Table 1 - List of railways indicators Indicator Unit of measurement / Coding Status Existing / planned / under construction / to be upgraded Length Km Number of tracks Number Activity Passengers / freight / both Traction Electrified / Diesel Design speed km/h Max operating speed km/h Max axle load kN Maximum train length m Maximum inclination ‰ net tons per year Freight traffic flow trains per day Passenger traffic flow pass per year trains per day Table 2 - List of road indicators Indicator Unit of measurement / Coding National name Name European route name Name Status Existing / planned / under construction / to be upgraded Type of road Single carriageway / expressway / motorway with separated lanes Length Km Lanes numbers Design speed km/h Condition of the road high/medium/poor Eastern Partnership regional transport study June 2015 Annex I – Data Collection P a g e | 4 Indicator Unit of measurement / Coding Freight traffic flow trucks per day Passenger traffic flow cars per day The indicator “Condition of the road” takes into account on surface design and maintenance status, whereas: High: Adequate surface condition with no hazard to traffic flow Medium: Acceptable condition, no immediate action is required as shown in the picture Poor: The road surface condition may pose risk to traffic flow and increased safety hazard. 1.1.2. DATA COVERAGE This section presents an overview of data coverage of indicators for countries and transport modes. The overview tables reported below represent the percentage (expressed in terms of length of EaP network to be covered) of data coverage of each indicator at country level. In green are indicated those situations where coverage is higher than 70%; in yellow the situations where the coverage is between 50% and 70%; in red all those situations where either data coverage is below 50% or no data has been provided or collected. Armenia and Belarus, where more problems were encountered in the data collection, are handled at the end of the section in dedicated tables. 1) AZERBAIJAN – GEORGIA – MOLDOVA - UKRAINE Table 3 – EaP road network - Data availability overview INFRASTRUCTURE TRAFFIC FLOWS № COUNTRY NAME National Name National Status Type Lanes (km/h) speed Design ofCondition the road flowtraffic Freight (trucks day) per Passenger flowtraffic (cars per day) 2 Azerbaijan 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 73% 73% 4 Georgia 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 79%* 79%* 5 Moldova 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 75%* 75%* 6 Ukraine 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 77% 0% GOOD DATA COVERAGE MEDIUM DATA COVERAGE NO DATA PROVIDED OR INSUFFICIENT DATA COVERAGE * Harmonised data Eastern Partnership regional transport study June 2015 Annex I – Data Collection P a g e | 5 Table 4 – EaP rail network - Data availability overview INFRASTRUCTURE TRAFFIC FLOWS Status oftracksNumber Activity Traction speed (km/h) Design Maxoperatingspeed (km/h) Maxaxle load (kN) Maximum train length (m) Maximuminclination (%) (tons flowtraffic Freight peryear) traffic Freight flow per (trainsday) flow Passenger traffic year) (pax per flowPassenger traffic (trainsday) per 2 Azerbaijan 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%* 100%* 100%* 100%* 4 Georgia 100% 100% 100% 100% 76% 76% 76% 76% 76% 76% 76% 15% 15%* 5 Moldova 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 45% 100% 80% 100% 80% 80%* 84% 84%* 6 Ukraine 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 95% 0% 95% 0% 95% GOOD DATA COVERAGE MEDIUM DATA COVERAGE NO DATA PROVIDED OR INSUFFICIENT DATA COVERAGE * Harmonised data 2) ARMENIA - BELARUS Table 5 – EaP road network - Data availability overview Road Links - Data availability Overview INFRASTRUCTURE TRAFFIC FLOWS № COUNTRY NAME National Name National Status Type Lanes (km/h) speed Design ofCondition the road flowtraffic Freight (trucks day) per Passenger flowtraffic (cars per day) 1 Armenia 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 93% 93% 3 Belarus 100% 100% 85% 100% 100% 100% 19% 19% GOOD DATA COVERAGE MEDIUM DATA COVERAGE NO DATA PROVIDED OR INSUFFICIENT DATA COVERAGE Direct surveys on road conditions and traffic counts performed by IDEA II project improved data availability in Armenia and Belarus. Eastern Partnership regional transport study June 2015 Annex I – Data Collection P a g e | 6 Table 6 – EaP rail network - Data availability overview INFRASTRUCTURE TRAFFIC FLOWS Status oftracksNumber Activity Traction speed (km/h) Design speed operatingMax (km/h) axle Maxload (kN) Maximum train length (m) inclination Maximum(%) (tons flowtraffic Freight perday) traffic Freight flow per day) (trains flow traffic Passenger day) (pax per flowtraffic Passenger day) (trains per 1 Armenia 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3 Belarus 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% GOOD DATA COVERAGE MEDIUM DATA COVERAGE NO DATA PROVIDED OR INSUFFICIENT DATA COVERAGE Eastern Partnership regional transport study June 2015 Annex I – Data Collection P a g e | 7 2 DATA COLLECTED THROUGH NATIONAL ADMINISTRATIONS AND OFFICIAL SOURCES The involvement of the IDEA country experts and EaP Transport Panel experts (first approach) was structured along the following activities: Establishing contact with TEN-Tec for receiving EaP transport network GIS files (shapefiles) and for assuring compatibility with indicators attributes; Since received TEN TEC shapefiles didn’t include inland waterways, producing shapefiles
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PAP-10-GB.Pdf
    !"#$%&'()*')' +&&$*'* , ! ! "- ! . / ! , 0 1%- ! " " %12*3- , 4" 5 4 )*)* " - ! . / ! , 0 Boris Zalessky Growth points Features of development in the face of global challenges 1 2 Table of contents Sustainable development goals and media ................................................................................. 5 Global information security and regional press ........................................................................ 12 From strategy to attract foreign investment to international cooperation ................................ 20 Honorary Consuls Institute: project-specific orientation.......................................................... 28 Export culture and mass consciousness .................................................................................... 31 Exports to distant arc countries as an important factor for development ................................. 34 Food exports: growth trends ..................................................................................................... 37 Export of services: among priorities - tourism ......................................................................... 40 Import substitution: growth reserves - in modernization.......................................................... 43 From green economy to green cities........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Partnership Policy Beyond 2020: Advances and Omissions in a Vast Agenda
    14 April 2020 Eastern Partnership policy beyond 2020: advances and omissions in a vast agenda Michael Emerson, Steven Blockmans, Denis Cenusa, Tamara Kovziridze and Veronika Movchan The Joint Communication on the Eastern Partnership (EaP)1 published in March offers a broad array of policy orientations but relatively little operational specificity. This drafting is presumably intended to be acceptable to all six EaP states. The lack of reference to the joint request of the three states with Association Agreements (AAs) – Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine – to open a ‘quadrilogue’ with the EU to treat matters of common concern to them, and which are not relevant or plausible in relation to the other EaP states, is a glaring omission that could still be corrected at the EaP summit on 18 June. This summit should also agree on EaP policy beyond 2020, with the partner states, and include the many transnational issues worthy of quadrilateral consultations, such as how revisions of major EU policies (for instance, on energy, climate and competition) may affect the associated states. 1 Communication by the European Commission and High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, “Eastern Partnership policy beyond 2020 – Reinforcing Resilience – an Eastern Partnership that delivers for all”, JOIN(2020)7 final, 18 March 2020. Michael Emerson is Associate Senior Research Fellow at CEPS. Steven Blockmans is Head of the EU Foreign Policy unit at CEPS and Professor of EU External Relations Law and Governance at the University of Amsterdam. Denis Cenusa is a political scientist and Program Director on Energy Security at the independent economic think-tank Expert-Grup, Chisinau, Moldova.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine Forestry Sector Note Status and Opportunities for Development
    Ukraine Forestry Sector Note Status and Opportunities for Development March 2006 PREFACE This note was prepared by a combined team of World Bank staff and Ukrainian and international consultants, working in close collaboration with the State Forestry Committee of Ukraine. The team is grateful for contributions and support provided by the Swiss Development Corporation and PROFOR1. The findings and opinion presented are based on an assessment of the available information and consultations with a broad range of forestry sector stakeholders, including officials of the Ministry of Agricultural Policy; the Ministry of Industrial Policy; the Ministry of Environmental Protection; the State Forestry Committee, Oblast level forestry departments, State forest enterprises, private sector investors in primary and secondary wood processing industries, NGOs, and the academic community. The objective of the note is to draw attention to a tentative agenda of key issues, and to inform discussion among forestry sector stakeholders regarding the needs, opportunities and options available to maintain and manage Ukraine’s forests for the benefit of all. 1 PROFOR is a multi-donor partnership formed to pursue a shared goal of enhancing forests' contribution to poverty reduction, sustainable development and protection of environmental services, through improved knowledge and approaches for sustainable forest management. PROFOR is funded by the Department for International Development (DFID) of the United Kingdom, the Finnish Department for International Development
    [Show full text]
  • The World Bank Rural Infrastructure in Armenia
    30312 Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Rural Infrastructure in Armenia: Addressing Gaps in Service Delivery Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Infrastructure and Energy Services Department Europe and Central Asia Region 1st September 2004 FINAL REPORT: 1st September 2004 Disclaimer: This paper is published to communicate the results of the Bank’s work to the development community with minimum delay. The typescript of this paper, therefore, has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formal printed texts and the World Bank accepts no responsibility for errors. Some sources cited in this paper may be informal documents that are not readily available. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank cannot guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply on the part of the World Bank any judgment of the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. © 2004 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), The World Bank. ii FINAL REPORT: 1st September 2004 CONTENTS Abbreviations And Acronyms vi Acknowledgments vii Overview and Summary of Recommendations 1 Introduction 5 Why did we do this Study?........................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Partnership Regional Transport Study
    Eastern Partnership regional transport study TRACECA IDEAJune II 2015 Annex II – Thematic maps P a g e | 1 Transport Dialogue and THIS PROJECT IS FUNDED BY THE EU Networks Interoperability II Eastern Partnership regional transport study Final report Annex II – Thematic maps June 2015 This document is prepared by the IDEA II Project. The IDEA II Project is implemented by TRT Trasporti e Territorio in association with: Panteia Group, Dornier Consulting GmbH and Lutsk University Eastern Partnership regional transport study June 2015 Annex II – Thematic maps P a g e | 2 TABLE OF CONTENT 1 ANNEX II – THEMATIC MAPS ................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Rail maps................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Road maps ................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Maps for Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova ........................................................................ 6 1.2 Maps for Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan ................................................................... 7 Eastern Partnership regional transport study June 2015 Annex II – Thematic maps P a g e | 3 1 ANNEX II – THEMATIC MAPS In the context of this assignment, a GIS database to display the collected indicators of the EaP transport network has been completed. The GIS database is based on the shapefiles (GIS files) of the EaP road and rail transport networks received
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Technical Assistance to Sra on Environmental Issues
    CHAPTER 6 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO SRA ON ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Preparatory Survey on the Project for Construction of Mykolaiv Bridge in Ukraine Final Report 6. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO SRA ON ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 6.1 Environmental and Social Considerations 6.1.1 Project Components (1) Name The Project for Construction of Mykolaiv Bridge in Ukraine (2) Project Proponent The State Road Administration of Mykolaiv in Ukraine (Ukravtodor Mykolaiv) (3) Project Object The aim of the planned activity is to construct a highway river crossing over the Southern Bug River of city Mykolaiv cit;y. A highway river crossing including the bridge and approaches to it on the road M-14 Odessa – Melitopol – Novoazovsk (to Taganrog): beginning on the right bank of the Southern Bug River near the village Vesniane from M-14; end – on the left bank to the M-14 at the crossing with auto road P-06 Ulianovka – Mykolaiv. Construction of approaches to the bridge structures requires allocation of land for permanent use within the projected band allocation of the road. At present these lands are owned by individuals and legal entities. (4) Location Ukraine is located in Eastern Europe and is surrounded by seven countries; Romania, Moldova, Slovakia, Hungary, and Poland in the west, Belarus in the north, and Russia in the east, as well as the Black Sea in the south. In order to exploit this geographical position, the Government of Ukraine established the “Comprehensive Program for Consolidation of Ukraine as a Transit Country for 2002-2010”, which was indicative of the importance attached to establishing international trunk roads providing new traffic systems for cross-border logistics.
    [Show full text]
  • ZRBG – Ghetto-Liste (Stand: 01.08.2014) Sofern Eine Beschäftigung I
    ZRBG – Ghetto-Liste (Stand: 01.08.2014) Sofern eine Beschäftigung i. S. d. ZRBG schon vor dem angegebenen Eröffnungszeitpunkt glaubhaft gemacht ist, kann für die folgenden Gebiete auf den Beginn der Ghettoisierung nach Verordnungslage abgestellt werden: - Generalgouvernement (ohne Galizien): 01.01.1940 - Galizien: 06.09.1941 - Bialystok: 02.08.1941 - Reichskommissariat Ostland (Weißrussland/Weißruthenien): 02.08.1941 - Reichskommissariat Ukraine (Wolhynien/Shitomir): 05.09.1941 Eine Vorlage an die Untergruppe ZRBG ist in diesen Fällen nicht erforderlich. Datum der Nr. Ort: Gebiet: Eröffnung: Liquidierung: Deportationen: Bemerkungen: Quelle: Ergänzung Abaujszanto, 5613 Ungarn, Encyclopedia of Jewish Life, Braham: Abaújszántó [Hun] 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Kassa, Auschwitz 27.04.2010 (5010) Operationszone I Enciklopédiája (Szántó) Reichskommissariat Aboltsy [Bel] Ostland (1941-1944), (Oboltsy [Rus], 5614 Generalbezirk 14.08.1941 04.06.1942 Encyclopedia of Jewish Life, 2001 24.03.2009 Oboltzi [Yid], Weißruthenien, heute Obolce [Pol]) Gebiet Vitebsk Abony [Hun] (Abon, Ungarn, 5443 Nagyabony, 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Encyclopedia of Jewish Life 2001 11.11.2009 Operationszone IV Szolnokabony) Ungarn, Szeged, 3500 Ada 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Braham: Enciklopédiája 09.11.2009 Operationszone IV Auschwitz Generalgouvernement, 3501 Adamow Distrikt Lublin (1939- 01.01.1940 20.12.1942 Kossoy, Encyclopedia of Jewish Life 09.11.2009 1944) Reichskommissariat Aizpute 3502 Ostland (1941-1944), 02.08.1941 27.10.1941 USHMM 02.2008 09.11.2009 (Hosenpoth) Generalbezirk
    [Show full text]
  • Spectator Guide
    spectator guide Information in this guide is correct as of the date of publication. The Foundation "Directorate of the 2nd European Games 2019" may update and supplement this version. For more information go to www.minsk2019.by CULTURAL OLYMPIAD CULTURAL 2nd EUROPEAN GAMES MINSK 2019 01. GREETINGS 02. FLAME OF PEACE 03. SPORTS 04. COMPETITION SCHEDULE 1-1 HI, FRIENDS! I am Lesik, mascot of the 2nd European Games MINSK 2019. I invite you to Minsk to the main European sports celebration in 2019! MINSK 2019 will bring together the finest athletes to promote Olympic values and unite all nations of Europe in a fair contest. The Games will be a mix of the centuries-old Belarusian culture and ideals of the sporting movement. I have prepared a lot of nice bright vytsinankas for the Games. Vytsynanka is the traditional Belarusian paper craft which has been chosen as a symbol of GREETINGS the Games. The 2nd European Games logo is a colourful fern flower. Legends tell that the fern flower blossoms on the summer night of Ivan Kupala. The lucky ones to find it will have all their dreams come true. Athletes from all over Europe will gather in Minsk in June 2019 to follow their dreams and compete for the priceless trophy. It is not only triumphs, record-breaking results and splendid shows that make this celebration bright – but your smiles, too. MINSK 2019 is for everyone! Your emotions will breathe life into the stadiums and sports arenas. Your support will encourage the best athletes of Europe to be faster, stronger and higher.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of Potential and Development Perspectives
    WIND ENERGY IN ARMENIA: OVERVIEW OF POTENTIAL AND DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES ASSISTANCE TO ENERGY SECTOR TO STRENGTHEN ENERGY SECURITY AND REGIONAL INTEGRATION CONTRACT NUMBER EPP-I-08-03-00008-00 MARCH 2010 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by PA Government Services Inc. Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of Potential and Development Perspectives ASSISTANCE TO ENERGY SECTOR TO STRENGTHEN ENERGY SECURITY AND REGIONAL INTEGRATION CONTRACT NUMBER EPP-I-08-03-00008-00 The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of Potential and Development Perspectives ASSISTANCE TO ENERGY SECTOR TO STRENGTHEN ENERGY SECURITY AND REGIONAL INTEGRATION CONTRACT NUMBER EPP-I-08-03-00008-00 March 2010 © PA Consulting Group 2010 Prepared for: United States Agency for PA Government Services Inc. International Development 4601 N. Fairfax Drive Armenia Mission Suite 600 1 American Ave. Arlington, VA 22203 Yerevan 0082 Armenia Prepared by: PA Government Services Inc. Tel: +1 571 227 9000 Fax: +1 571 227 9001 www.paconsulting.com Version: 1.0 Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of potential and development perspectives. March 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Summary 1-1 2. Introduction 2-1 2.1 International Trends 2-1 2.2 State of the energy sector in Armenia 2-3 3. Wind Studies 3-1 4. Wind Measurements 4-1 5. Wind Energy Potential 5-1 6. Development perspectives 6-1 6.1 Technical limitations 6-1 6.2 Perspective Sites 6-3 6.3 Grid Interconnection 6-8 6.4 Economic Limitations 6-11 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Adopted Resolution
    ADOPTED RESOLUTION EPP CONGRESS ZAGREB, 20 – 21 NOVEMBER 2019 Resolution adopted at the EPP Congress, Zagreb (Croatia), 20th - 21th November 2019 EPP Resolution on the 10th anniversary of the Eastern Partnership and its future Bearing in mind that: a) Eastern Partnership is a tailor-made concept of cooperation for all six countries: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine. Their further progress on the European path is very much dependent on compliance with European values and standards, to which these countries have committed themselves. b) the EU has proved its enormous transformative power through the Enlargement Policy, as confirmed by the success of the Central and Eastern European countries in their development from post-totalitarian regulated economies to European style democracies and social market economies, which was achieved due to the process of integration into the EU, c) this transformative power by enlargement shall be used in the Western Balkans and also in Eastern Partnership countries, willing to join the EU, d) this year marks the 10th anniversary of the Eastern Partnership (the EaP) which was established in 2009 as part of the European Neighborhood Policy and throughout the decade it has proven to be an effective instrument for providing tailored support based on the ‘more for more and less for less’ principle for the EaP countries in their implementation of the European reforms, e) the EPP in its Resolution on Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova, adopted during the EPP Congress in Helsinki on 7-8 November
    [Show full text]
  • Contours and Consequences of the Lexical Divide in Ukrainian
    Geoffrey Hull and Halyna Koscharsky1 Contours and Consequences of the Lexical Divide in Ukrainian When compared with its two large neighbours, Russian and Polish, the Ukrainian language presents a picture of striking internal variation. Not only are Ukrainian dialects more mutually divergent than those of Polish or of territorially more widespread Russian,2 but on the literary level the language has long been characterized by the existence of two variants of the standard which have never been perfectly harmonized, in spite of the efforts of nationalist writers for a century and a half. While Ukraine’s modern standard language is based on the eastern dialect of the Kyiv-Poltava-Kharkiv triangle, the literary Ukrainian cultivated by most of the diaspora communities continues to follow to a greater or lesser degree the norms of the Lviv koiné in 1 The authors would like to thank Dr Lance Eccles of Macquarie University for technical assistance in producing this paper. 2 De Bray (1969: 30-35) identifies three main groups of Russian dialects, but the differences are the result of internal evolutionary divergence rather than of external influences. The popular perception is that Russian has minimal dialectal variation compared with other major European languages. Maximilian Fourman (1943: viii), for instance, told students of Russian that the language ‘is amazingly uniform; the same language is spoken over the vast extent of the globe where the flag of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics flies; and you will be understood whether you are speaking to a peasant or a university professor. There are no dialects to bother you, although, of course, there are parts of the Soviet Union where Russian may be spoken rather differently, as, for instance, English is spoken differently by a Londoner, a Scot, a Welshman, an Irishman, or natives of Yorkshire or Cornwall.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine
    Syracuse University SURFACE Religion College of Arts and Sciences 2005 Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine Samuel D. Gruber United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/rel Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Gruber, Samuel D., "Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine" (2005). Full list of publications from School of Architecture. Paper 94. http://surface.syr.edu/arc/94 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religion by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel
    [Show full text]