DOCSLIB.ORG

Journal of Research in Forestry, Wildlife and Environment, Volume 13, No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Journal of Research in Forestry, Wildlife and Environment, Volume 13, No Bukie et al., 2021 Journal of Research in Forestry, Wildlife & Environment Vol. 13(1) March, 2021 E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] http://www.ajol.info/index.php/jrfwe © jfewr 2020 - jfewr Publications 36 This work is licensed under a ISBN: 2141 – 1778 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License Bukie et al., 2021 POPULATION DENSITY ESTIMATE AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF MONA MONKEYS (Cercopithecus mona Schreiber, 1774) IN OKOMU NATIONAL PARK EDO STATE, NIGERIA *Bukie, J.O1&2. Ebu,V.T2, Adia, J.E.3 Ogbebor, E.O1. 1Department of Wildlife and Range Management, Federal University of Agriculture Makurdi Benue State. 2Department of Forestry and Wildlife Resources Management, University of Calabar, Nigeria 3Department of Forestry Technology. Akperan Orshi Polytechnic Yandev, Gboko Benue State *Correspondent author email: [email protected]; Phone: +234 7039529415 ABSTRACT The population density estimates and spatial distribution of Mona monkeys in Okomu National Park was carried out in this study using the line transect method. The mean density of Mona monkeys was observed to be high (26) in Okomu National park and the morning and evening censuses showed that there was significant statistical difference between the morning and evening censuses (P-value +2.45 at 0.05 threshold). The spatial distribution of Mona monkeys was observed to be more in Arakuan range than in any other range within the selected ranges due to the fact that Mona monkeys in this range are semi-habituated because of the high tourism activities in this range and the presence of the rangers camp which offered more protection to the animals and the proximity to Okomu oil palm estate. Keywords: Mona monkeys, Population, Distribution, Okomu National Park INTRODUCTION currently facing a lot of habitat challenges Okomu National Park, Edo State, is a due to human dimensions and factors lowland rainforest area rich in biodiversity including illegal logging activities, Olaleru et al., (2020). It is home to endemic poaching, habitat encroachment, white-throated monkeys (Cercopithecus deforestation and urbanization resulting in erythrogaster). The rich rainforest of population decrease. Therefore there is need Okomu National park Edo state harbor an to estimate their population density and impressive assemblage of terrestrial species spatial distribution within the park as well as fascinating array of ecological boundaries, because of potential ecotourism process. Gregory et al (2007) explained that interest of National and international forests services provided by ecological concern in Okomu National Park. process of Okomu National Park Edo State include unique economic assets, recreation, The Mona monkey (Cercopithecus mona) is spiritual quest, improving water quality, an Old World monkey that lives throughout prevent soil erosion, regulating rainfall, western Africa. The Mona monkey can also providing food, energy and timber seen as be found on the island of Grenada as it was rich sources of biodiversity. transported to the island aboard slave ships headed to the New World during the 18th The scattered populations of Mona monkey century. This guenon lives in groups of up to (Cercopithecus mona) found within the five 35 in arboreal regions. It mainly feeds on (5) ranges of Okomu National Park is JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN FORESTRY, WILDLIFE AND ENVIRONMENT, VOLUME 13, NO. 1, MARCH, 2021 POPULATION DENSITY ESTIMATE AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF MONA MONKEYS (Cercopithecus mona Schreiber, 1774) IN OKOMU NATIONAL PARK EDO STATE, NIGERIA 37 fruit but sometimes eats insects and leaves. Nigeria and lies between latitude 60, 15’ and Olaleru et al, (2020). 60, 25’ North and Latitude 50, 9’ and 50, 23’ The Mona monkey (Cercopithecus mona) is east. The park (approximately 112km2) is one of the Africa’s most common guenon located within the confines of support zone (Oates, 2011). Though the species is communities such as Nikorowa, Udo, protected by the Nigeria endangered species Asamara, Reuben enclave and mile 3 decree number 11 of 1985, it is conserved (N.C.F., 1985). The climate of the study area and protected only in National Parks, Games is typical of moist rainforest ecosystem with Reserves and Wildlife Sanctuaries. Mona mean annual rainfall of about 2,100mm; Monkeys have few wildlife species that are mean monthly temperature of 30.20C and involved in food competition and no relative humidity of about 65% during the predators from the wild. However, they are afternoon throughout the year (Happold, always facing the major anthropogenic 1987; F.R.I.N 2000). The vegetation of the threat of persistent and intensive hunting by study area consists of mainly secondary high poachers. Over the years, these species of forest on well drained plateau sites. The primates have been subjected to severe tropical tree species in the study area include hunting for bush meat. Most times, adult Astonia boonei, Combretodendron monkeys are hunted for the purpose of using africanum, Afzelia africana and many other the young ones as pets. The Mona “sneeze” tree species. call, an alarm call that travels quickly through a group, is usually the first sign that The study area boasts of an impressive Monas are in the nearby forest, apart from assemblage of wildlife resources, some of the loud call of the male. The alarm call is which are endemic, threatened or used to warn troop members of danger, endangered in Nigeria (N.C.F., 2006). Apart usually predators such as snakes or eagles from the Mona monkey, there are two other and man. A careful observer who remains primates, the white throated monkey undetected may also hear their contact call (Cercopithecus erythrogaster) and the putty- “nnneee”, made at frequent intervals to help nose monkey (Cercopithecus nictitans) – keep contact with each other in the thick (O.N.P., 2006). Besides primates, there are vegetation. Hunters say in the mangrove other species of fauna such as the forest areas, the large male also warns others of the elephants (Loxodonta africana), forest incoming tide with his “boom” call, a two buffalos (Syncerus caffer), duiker syllable resonant short call, often preceding (Cephalophus spp.) and an impressive the loud “hack” Mona monkeys are probably species of butterflies including the large the most commonly held captive primate in lurid gliders (Cymotheo hypatha okomu), Nigeria. Known generally as the most which is endemic to the study area. Typical mischievous and curious of monkeys, as mammals and bird’s species in the study youngsters they unfortunately appear to area include pigmy hippopotamus make delightful pets. (Choeropsis liberiensis), tree hyrax (Dendrohyrax dosalis) forest francolins MATERIALS AND METHOD (Francolinus aquamatus), hornbill Study Area (Ceratogymna atrata) and many other Okomu National park is in Ovia South- species of animals and birds (Figure 1). West Local Government Area of Edo State, JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN FORESTRY, WILDLIFE AND ENVIRONMENT, VOLUME 13, NO. 1, MARCH, 2021 Bukie et al., 2021 38 Figure 1: Map of Nigeria, showing the study site, the ranges and sampling locations Method of Data Collection i. Transect number Line transects method of data collection ii. Right angle distance to the path of The line transect method was used for observation walked by observer population density estimate of the Mona iii. Distance of observer to animals Monkey (Cercopithecus mona), this method sighted was also used by Ajayi et al (2011), Bukie, iv. Number of Mona monkeys sighted (2015) and Bukie et al., (2016). Six transect (two from each of the three ranges Using the information above, the population in Arakhuan, Iron Bridge and Julius Creek) density of the Mona monkey was were randomly selected from the study area. determined by: Transect lengths of 1.0km and width of N D = ……………1 0.02km was systematically spaced at 2LW approximately 1.0km from each other. Where: D = Mona population density (Number/km2) Distances along transects were marked with N = Number of Mona sighted flagging tapes at intervals of 0.5km for easy L = Distance walked by observer (km) identification of animal locations on W = Effective strip width (ESW) – Km. transect. Each transect was covered by an observer and the census was carried out Data analysis: The student’s’ test (test of simultaneously in all the six transects. The independent means) was used to test the census was started simultaneously the same results of the Mona monkeys population time, date and pace, during the census, the density in the two censuses, the test criterion observer was equipped with a binocular for is given as: easy observation and field book to record the following information Ajayi et al., (2011) JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN FORESTRY, WILDLIFE AND ENVIRONMENT, VOLUME 13, NO. 1, MARCH, 2021 POPULATION DENSITY ESTIMATE AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF MONA MONKEYS (Cercopithecus mona Schreiber, 1774) IN OKOMU NATIONAL PARK EDO STATE, NIGERIA 39 t = X1-X2 RESULT Sp2 1/ n 1/ n ……… 2 Population Density and spatial 1 2 Distribution of Mona Monkey in Okomu Where National Park X1 = mean density of first census (morning) The result of population density of Mona X2 = mean density for second census Monkeys in Okomu National Park is shown (evening) on table 1 for the morning census and table 2 Sp = Pooled variance 2 for the evening census. However, the n1= Frequency of first census spatial distribution of the Mona monkeys in n2 = Frequency of second census Okomu National Park was highest in Arakhuan range and lowest in Julius Creek range Figure 2. Table 1: Population density
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comments on the Ornithology of Nigeria, Including Amendments to the National List
    Robert J. Dowsett 154 Bull. B.O.C. 2015 135(2) Comments on the ornithology of Nigeria, including amendments to the national list by Robert J. Dowsett Received 16 December 2014 Summary.—This paper reviews the distribution of birds in Nigeria that were not treated in detail in the most recent national avifauna (Elgood et al. 1994). It clarifies certain range limits, and recommends the addition to the Nigerian list of four species (African Piculet Verreauxia africana, White-tailed Lark Mirafra albicauda, Western Black-headed Batis Batis erlangeri and Velvet-mantled Drongo Dicrurus modestus) and the deletion (in the absence of satisfactory documentation) of six others (Olive Ibis Bostrychia olivacea, Lesser Short-toed Lark Calandrella rufescens, Richard’s Pipit Anthus richardi, Little Grey Flycatcher Muscicapa epulata, Ussher’s Flycatcher M. ussheri and Rufous-winged Illadopsis Illadopsis rufescens). Recent research in West Africa has demonstrated the need to clarify the distributions of several bird species in Nigeria. I have re-examined much of the literature relating to the country, analysed the (largely unpublished) collection made by Boyd Alexander there in 1904–05 (in the Natural History Museum, Tring; NHMUK), and have reviewed the data available in the light of our own field work in Ghana (Dowsett-Lemaire & Dowsett 2014), Togo (Dowsett-Lemaire & Dowsett 2011a) and neighbouring Benin (Dowsett & Dowsett- Lemaire 2011, Dowsett-Lemaire & Dowsett 2009, 2010, 2011b). The northern or southern localities of species with limited ranges in Nigeria were not always detailed by Elgood et al. (1994), although such information is essential for understanding distribution patterns and future changes. For many Guineo-Congolian forest species their northern limit in West Africa lies on the escarpment of the Jos Plateau, especially Nindam Forest Reserve, Kagoro.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSN: 2149-6528 2016 Vol. 1, Issue.1 SUSTAINABLE WILDLIFE
    Journal of Tourism and Management Research 101 ISSN:2149-6528 Journal of Tourism and Management Research ISSN: 2149-6528 2016 Vol. 1, Issue.1 SUSTAINABLE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION AT OKOMU NATIONAL PARK, NIGERIA Abstract The purpose of this study is to investigate the various sustainable preservation measures at Okomu National Park, Benin, Nigeria, identify the various challenges of the Park and suggest the way forward. Ethnography was adopted where research methods like key-informant interview, focus-group discussion, field observation, and electronic documentation were used to elicit data from the field. Relevant documentary sources were not left out either. Data gathered were analysed using descriptive and narrative analytical methods. This revealed a range of management measures that were grouped into two main categories (i.e. Educational measures and Technical measures). Major challenges like poaching and community violence were identified, with the major causes arising from host communities. At the end the study made a useful contribution to the sustainable management of parks for ecotourism development, by introducing the HoPSuP Model as a management practice to encourage a healthy host-park relationship in Nigeria and some other developing nations. Keywords: sustainability, wildlife, conservation, national park, challenges, HoPSuP model. _________________________________ Elochukwu A. Nwankwo, PhD. Department of Archaeology and Tourism / University of Nigeria Nsukka. Email: [email protected] Aishat Halilu, M.A. Department of Archaeology and Tourism / University of Nigeria, Nsukka. Email: [email protected] Original Scientific Paper Nwankwo, E.A and Halilu, A. Vol.1/No.1/2016/101-118. DOI:10.26465/ojtmr.2016132258 Journal of Tourism and Management Research 102 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Are of Special Scientific, Educative And
    Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management Vol. 4 No.3 2011 ASSESSMENT OF THE LARGE MAMMALS OF ARAKHUAN RANGE, OKOMU NATIONAL PARK, NIGERIA Akinsorotan, O. A., *Ogunjemite, B. G. and Afolayan, T. A. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ejesm.v4i3.4 Received September 26 th 2011; accepted October 5 th 2011 Abstract An assessment of the large mammals of Arakhuan Range, Okomu National Park, Edo State, Nigeria, was carried out using land transect methods. A total of 12 large mammalian species were observed (eight directly and four by their signs). These are made up of four primate species; Red-capped mangabey (Cercocebus torquatus), Mona monkey (Cercopithecus mona), White-throated monkey (C. erythrogaster pocoki), and Putty-nosed monkey (C. nictitans ludio), three species of antelope: Maxwell duiker (Cephalophus maxwelli), Yellow-backed duiker (Cephalophus silvicultor), and Red-flanked duiker (Cephalophus rufilatus), and a species of mangoose (Herpestes sp). Those observed through their activities were forest elephants (Loxodonta africana cylotis), forest buffalo (Syncerus caffer nanus), civet cat (Viverra civetta) and the red river hog (Patamochoerus porcus). Altogether, 145 sightings of animals were recorded during the study period. Mona monkeys were most commonly sighted (sighted 37 times, producing 0.22 sighting/km). The Red-flanked duiker was the most abundant with an estimated density of 36.66±7.68 km -2 and population of 1970.93±412.93 individuals. The yellow-backed duiker was very rare in the range as it was sighted three times with an estimated population of 9 ± 2 individuals. There is very strong correlation between sightings in the morning and that of evening (r = 0.94, P < 0.05).
    [Show full text]
  • National Park Service Act
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1 Establishment of the National Park Service of Nigeria and its Governing Board, etc. SECTION I. Establishment of the National Park Service. 2. Establishment and Composition of the National Park Service Governing Board. 3. Tenure of office of member. 4. Removal from office, etc. 5. Allowances of members. PART II Objectives, functions and powers 6. Objecti ves of the Service. 7. Functions of the Service. 8. Powers of the Service. PART Ill Staff of the Service 9. Conservator-General of the National Park Service. 10. Secretary and other staff. II. Application of the Pensions Act. 12. Fund of the Service. 13. Accounts, audit, and estimate. 14. Annual report. 15. Power to borrow. 16. Power to invest. 17. Power to accept gifts. PART IV Establishment, management, etc., of National Parks 18. Establishment of National Parks. 19. Procedure for establishing or altering the boundaries of National Parks. 20. Ownership of wild animals. Establishment, composition, etc., of National Parks Management Committee, etc. 21. Establishment of National Park Management Committees. 22. Functions of the Management Committees. SECTION 23. Powers of Management Committees. 24. Directors of National Parks. PART V Management principles, etc., of National Parks 25. Management of National Parks to be based on prescribed management principles. 26. Management principles of the National Park. 27. Management plan for the National Park. 28. System plan. PARTVI Offences and penalties 29. Restriction on entry into National Parks, etc. 30. Restriction on hunting, etc., in the National Parks. 31. Restriction on weapons, etc., in the National Parks. 32. Prohibition of introduction of wild animals into National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening Monitoring Systems for Adaptive Management and Protection of Forest Elephants in Omo Forest Reserve, Southwestern Nigeria
    STRENGTHENING MONITORING SYSTEMS FOR ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION OF FOREST ELEPHANTS IN OMO FOREST RESERVE, SOUTHWESTERN NIGERIA BEING A FINAL PROJECT REPORT By AMUSA Tajudeen Okekunle, PhD. Department of Forest Resources Management University of Ilorin, Nigeria SUBMITTED TO The Rufford Foundation (for nature conservation) www.ruffordsmallgrants.org 6th Floor, 248 Tottenham Court Road London W1T 7QZ MARCH 2021 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 5 2. Materials and Methods ........................................................................................... 5 2.1 Description of Project Site ..................................................................................... 5 2.2 Field Activities ...................................................................................................... 8 2.2.1 Project planning and setting out ......................................................................... 8 2.2.2 Stepping-up sensitivity and awareness on elephant conservation ........................... 8 2.2.3 Recruitment and training of rangers .................................................................... 9 2.2.4 Securing and maintaining the habitat of the elephants including their migratory corridors within the project area ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bushmeat in Nigeria
    UNDERSTANDING URBAN CONSUMPTION OF BUSHMEAT IN NIGERIA Understanding Urban Consumption of Bushmeat in Nigeria January 2021 Summary A growing appetite for bushmeat among urban residents increases the risk of zoonotic disease transmission, and threatens wildlife populations in Nigeria and its surrounding countries. This consumption also overlaps with the illegal trade networks, fueling the trade in protected species like elephants and pangolins. While studies have shown that bushmeat consumption in Nigeria is influenced by a number of factors such as taste, health, and culture, there is little information on the attitudes, awareness, preferences, and reservations of the general public in major cities such as Lagos, Abuja, Port Harcourt, and Calabar. The survey is designed to guide future conservation initiatives by establishing baseline data on attitudes, values, motivations, and behaviors of urban buyers, users, and intended users of bushmeat. WildAid also sought to identify the hotspots of bushmeat purchases while investigating the groups that are most likely to purchase or advocate for the conservation of wildlife in Nigeria. With a better understanding of these influencing factors, multi- stakeholder interventions can ultimately lead to more effective and integrated policies along with permanent behavior change. We sampled 2,000 respondents from September to October 2020 across four major cities in Nigeria using a questionnaire that was sent to mobile phones via their telecommunications carrier. Results found that over 70% of urban Nigerians have consumed bushmeat at some point in their lives, and 45% consumed it within the last year. Taste and flavor are significant factors influencing urban bushmeat consumption, with about 51% of bushmeat consumers indicating that it is one of the primary reasons for their choice.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends of Game Reserves, National Park and Conservation in Nigeria
    International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation Vol. 5(4), pp. 185-191, April 2013 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/IJBC DOI: 10.5897/IJBC11.127 ISSN 2141-243X ©2013 Academic Journals Review Trends in wildlife conservation practices in Nigeria Ejidike B. N.1* and Ajayi S. R.2 1Department of Ecotourism and Wildlife Management, Federal University of Technology, Akure Ondo State, Nigeria. 2Federal College of Wildlife Management, New Bussa, Niger State, Nigeria. Accepted 16 May, 2012 Civilization and development came with force of manipulations on the habitats of most wildlife so as to meet the needs of man. Urge for propagation and sustainability of wild flora and fauna brought about conservation practices that led to designating particular locations for their keeping. These areas are set aside to maintain functioning natural ecosystems to act as refuge for species and to maintain ecological processes. Forest and game reserves are the first protected areas created and maintained in Nigeria. They existed long before the creation of national parks in the country. Most of the game and forest reserves were upgraded and enacted to the status of national parks. In some situations like in Kainji Lake National park, Borgu Game Reserve and Zuguruma forest reserve were merged and enacted with decree No 46 of 1979 to be a national park. Conversion of some of the game reserves to national parks led to increase in the number of national parks. Key words: Borgu Game Reserve, Zuguruma Game Reserve, flora and fauna. INTRODUCTION At the onset of creation all creatures are living freely in landscapes areas are protected, managed and regulated the wild.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Oil Palm Landscapes a Seven-Country Survey of the Modern Palm Oil Industry in Southeast Asia, Latin America and West Africa
    OCCASIONAL PAPER Managing oil palm landscapes A seven-country survey of the modern palm oil industry in Southeast Asia, Latin America and West Africa Lesley Potter OCCASIONAL PAPER 122 Managing oil palm landscapes A seven-country survey of the modern palm oil industry in Southeast Asia, Latin America and West Africa Lesley Potter Crawford School of Public Policy, ANU College of Asia and the Pacific, The Australian National University Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) Occasional Paper 122 © 2015 Center for International Forestry Research Content in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ISBN 978-602-1504-92-5 DOI: 10.17528/cifor/005612 Potter L. 2015. Managing oil palm landscapes: A seven-country survey of the modern palm oil industry in Southeast Asia, Latin America and West Africa. Occasional Paper 122. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR. Photo by Lesley Potter An oil palm estate in Lamandau District, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. CIFOR Jl. CIFOR, Situ Gede Bogor Barat 16115 Indonesia T +62 (251) 8622-622 F +62 (251) 8622-100 E [email protected] cifor.org We would like to thank all donors who supported this research through their contributions to the CGIAR Fund. For a list of Fund donors please see: https://www.cgiarfund.org/FundDonors Any views expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of CIFOR, the editors, the authors’ institutions, the financial sponsors or the reviewers.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Ayanlade Ayansina 0854
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Remote Sensing of Environmental Change in the Niger Delta, Nigeria Ayanlade, Ayansina Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 09. Oct. 2021 University of London Remote Sensing of Environmental Change in the Niger Delta, Nigeria By Ayansina Ayanlade This thesis is submitted to King’s College London, University of London, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2014 Department of Geography, School of Social Sciences and Public Policy, King’s College London University of London.
    [Show full text]
  • Jfewr ©2017 - Jfewr Publications E-Mail:[email protected] ISBN: 2141 – 1778 Amusa Et Al., 2017
    Journal of Research in Forestry, Wildlife & Environment Vol. 9(2) June, 2017 http://www.ajol.info/index.php/jrfwe 44 jfewr ©2017 - jfewr Publications E-mail:[email protected] ISBN: 2141 – 1778 Amusa et al., 2017 POPULATION STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION OF FOREST ELEPHANTS (Loxodonta cyclotis Matschie, 1900) IN OKOMU NATIONAL PARK AND OMO FOREST RESERVE, SOUTH-WESTERN NIGERIA Amusa, T.O*1., Omonu, C2., Olabode, E2., Newton, N.J3. 1Department of Forest Resources Management, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria 2Nigerian Conservation Foundation, Omo-Oluwa-Shasha Forest Project, Km 19, Lagos-Epe Expressway, Lekki, Victoria Island, Lagos, Nigeria 3Okomu National Park, Udo, Edo State, Nigeria/Nigeria National Park Service, Abuja * Corresponding Author’s Phone: +234-7033831616; +2348051750289; E-mail: [email protected];[email protected] ABSTRACT The study was carried out to determine the population status and distribution of forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis Matschie, 1900) in Okomu National Park (ONP) and Omo Forest Reserve (OFR), Nigeria. The Line Transect Survey Method, footprints analysis, trail cameras and in-depth discussion were used for data collection spanning between April 2015 and March 2016. Elephant densities were computed as described by Barnes and Jensen (1987), while the estimate of elephant numbers was extrapolated from the footprints diameter data. A mean density of 0.15 elephants/km2 was obtained for the rainy season in ONP, while it was 0.08 elephants/km2 during the dry season. In OFR, mean density was 0.14 elephants/km2 for the rainy season, while it was 0.06 elephants/km2 during the dry season. The estimate of elephant numbers revealed a total of 33 elephants comprising 24 adults (72.73%) and nine young ones (27.27%) in ONP.
    [Show full text]
  • Chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes) Populations in Southwestern Nigeria
    Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa (Volume 13, No.2, 2011) ISSN: 1520-5509 Clarion University of Pennsylvania, Clarion, Pennsylvania CHIMPANZEES (PAN TROGLODYTES) POPULATIONS IN SOUTHWESTERN NIGERIA Babafemi George Ogunjemite Department of Ecotourism and Wildlife Management, Federal University of Technology,Akure, Nigeria. ABSTRACT Many of the local populations of the chimpanzees had been exterminated in southwestern Nigeria. A clearer indication of the extent of depletion in population in the region is necessary. The aim of this paper is to presents a review on the censuses in the population of chimpanzees in the region. A total of 7,134.6 km2 of potential chimpanzee habitats was estimated for the region, with only 53.9% (3,845.5 km-2) yielding evidence of the chimpanzees’ presence. Chimpanzees occur at an estimated density of 0.10 Chimps km-2, giving an estimated 384 individual chimpanzees for the region. The priority areas identified for chimpanzee conservation include Omo-Oluwa, Idanre-Ofosu, Ise Forest Reserves, and Okomu National Park. Although the potential chimpanzee habitats still appeared to be large in the region, the level of threats to the animal had greatly reduced the population to critical levels. Keywords: Southwestern Nigeria; Chimpanzee Populations; Potential Chimpanzees’ Habitat INTRODUCTION Chimpanzees in Southwestern Nigeria occur mainly in the forest vegetation (Agbelusi, 1994; Ogunjemite, Afolayan, Agbelusi, & Onadeko, 2006; Greengrass, 2006). The lack of accurate information on their population is a cause for concern for conservation and management of this species. In most cases, chimpanzees are not common in the protected areas, but they are close to farmlands, hunting zones, or logging concessions where they become very vulnerable to poaching.
    [Show full text]
  • Chimpanzees Are Close to Extinction in Southwest Nigeria
    Primate Conservation 2009 (24): 77–83 Chimpanzees are Close to Extinction in Southwest Nigeria Elizabeth J. Greengrass Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Clifton, Bristol, UK Abstract: A survey to assess the distribution and status of chimpanzees in the southwest region of Nigeria was conducted in order to identify areas where effective conservation action could be taken. Seventeen sites in five states were surveyed. Information was gathered through directed searches, using hunters as guides, and through interviews with local hunters, community members and government personnel. Findings suggest that chimpanzees survive at only about half the survey sites, and that the viability of these remaining populations is in doubt. According to interviewees, chimpanzees were present at all the survey sites 10 to 15 years ago. These findings suggest that in southwest Nigeria as a whole, their population size and distribution has sharply declined over the last decade. Recommendations include the formal and effective protection of some of these sites. Key words: Chimpanzees, habitat loss, logging, hunting, protected areas, conservation Introduction within the historic range of chimpanzees (Oates et al. 2003). Much of the remaining forest habitat is contained within Recent genetic evidence on the evolution of chimpan- state forest reserves, established during the colonial period to zee populations consistently divide West African chimpan- ensure timber supplies and safeguard watersheds. Like many zees into two separate groups, one in the westernmost Upper developing nations, Nigeria depends on its natural resources Guinea forest (P. t. verus Schwarz, 1934) and the second to generate much needed revenue. Combined with a relatively further east in Nigeria and western Cameroon, referred to as high level of economic development, due in large part to oil P.
    [Show full text]