DOCSLIB.ORG

JD-03 321 AR 28Pgs.Qxd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JD-03 321 AR 28Pgs.Qxd Consortium on Law and Values Nonprofit Org. in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences Joint Degree Program U.S. Postage in Law, Health & the Life Sciences PAID Mpls., MN Mondale Hall, Suite N140 Permit No. 155 University of Minnesota Law School 229 19th Avenue South Annual Report Minneapolis, MN 55455 2003-2004 612-625-0055 phone 612-624- 9143 fax www.lifesci.consortium.umn.edu www.jointdegree.umn.edu Highlights from 2003–2004: • New Presidential • Faegre & Benson Interdisciplinary Initiative Lecture Series on human subjects research • Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology • Lunch Series on to be launched agricultural and environmental ethics • 2 new degree combinations with • Intellectual Property Natural Resources Science Rights symposium and Management • Children’s • 2 new Consortium Environmental members Health conference • Deinard Memorial Lecture • 10 intramural Series on Law & Medicine grants awarded inaugurated • 25 JDP applicants • Visiting Scholar: • 7 new JDP enrollees Prof. William Sage, JD, MD • 1 more JDP graduate 2003–2004 Events Monday, September 22, 2003 Thursday, February 26, 2004 Lunch Series on the Societal Implications Deinard Memorial Lecture on Law & Medicine of the Life Sciences Prof. Troyen Brennan, Harvard University Prof. Dale Jamieson, Carleton College “The Crisis in Patient Safety and “Science, Ethics, and the Animal Malpractice: Fixing Medicine and Law” Protection Movement” Commentators: Prof. Roby Thompson, University of Minnesota, and Dr. Carol Ley, 3M Wednesday, October 29, 2003 Faegre & Benson Lecture Series Wednesday, March 10, 2004 on Law, Health & the Life Sciences Faegre & Benson Lecture Series Prof. Jeremy Sugarman, Duke University on Law, Health & the Life Sciences “Solutions to the Crisis in Human Subjects Dr. David Korn, Association Research: From Pillar to Post?” of American Medical Colleges Commentators: Profs. Jeffrey Kahn, “Financial Conflicts of Interest Cathy Jordan, University of Minnesota in Biomedical Research” Commentators: Profs. Norman Bowie, Monday, November 17, 2003 David Hamilton, University of Minnesota Lunch Series on the Societal Implications of the Life Sciences Friday, April 2, 2004 Prof. David Ehrenfeld, Rutgers University Annual Conference “Globalization and Biodiversity” “Environmental Threats to Children’s Health: Legal and Policy Challenges” Wednesday, December 3, 2003 Faegre & Benson Lecture Series Tuesday, April 13, 2004 on Law, Health & the Life Sciences Lunch Series on the Societal Implications Prof. Haavi Morreim, of the Life Sciences University of Tennessee Prof. Marion Nestle, New York University “Medical Devices: A Different Twist on the “The Ironic Politics of Obesity” Ethics and Law of Research Protections” Commentators: Ken Liebman, Esq., Faegre & Benson, and Prof. Susan Foote, Thursday, April 29, 2004 University of Minnesota Annual Symposium “Intellectual Property Rights for the For additional copies of this report Public Good: Obligations of U.S. Universities or to order other publications Tuesday, February 10, 2004 to Developing Countries” (past annual reports, program catalogs, Lunch Series on the Societal Implications brochures, or conference materials) of the Life Sciences please contact us: Prof. Eric Freyfogle, University of Illinois “Ecology, Ethics, and Private Land” Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences Joint Degree Program in Law, Health & the Life Sciences Mondale Hall, Suite N140 University of Minnesota Law School 229 19th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55455 (612) 625-0055 phone (612) 624-9143 fax [email protected] [email protected] Annual Report 2003–2004 Joint Degree Program in Law, Health & the Life Sciences Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences Table of Contents 2 Letter from the Director and Chair 3 Update on the Joint Degree Program and Consortium Joint Degree Program in Law, Health & the Life Sciences 5 Students, Recruitment, and Scholarships 6 Student Honors & Achievements 7 Joint Degree Program Proseminar 8 Joint Degree Program Faculty and Governing Committee 15 Joint Degree Program Advisory Board 18 Deinard Memorial Lecture Series on Law & Medicine 18 www.jointdegree.umn.edu Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences 19 Consortium Members 21 Presidential Interdisciplinary Initiative on Law and Values 22 Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 23 Consortium Requests for Proposals (RFPs) 24 Annual Symposium 25 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants 25 www.lifesci.consortium.umn.edu Audience at Prof. Eric Freyfogle’s Lunch Series lecture. Co-sponsored Activities 26 Executive Committee 27 Faegre & Benson Lecture Series on Law, Health & the Life Sciences 28 Lunch Series on the Societal Implications of the Life Sciences 29 Annual Conference 29 LAW/VALUES + LIFE SCIENCES Newsletter 30 Visiting Scholar: Prof. William Sage, JD, MD Dr. Ronald Cantrell, Shared Staff & Support Director General of the International 31 Staff Rice Research Institute, 32 Support & Acknowledgements speaks at the symposium on intellectual property rights. Prof. J. Routt Reigart, Medical University of South Carolina, and Prof. Peter Nathanielsz, New York University Medical Copyright 2004 © School, conversing during a break at the Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment “Environmental Threats to Children’s & the Life Sciences and Joint Degree Program in Law, Health” conference. Health & the Life Sciences, University of Minnesota. Photography by Tim Rummelhoff, Daniel Kieffer, Terence Brashear, Suzanne Livingston, and Tom Foley. Joint Degree Program in Law, Health & the Life Sciences Annual Report 1 Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences 2003–2004 Letter from the Director and Chair Dear Colleagues: The Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences was profoundly honored to be named one of 8 new Presidential Interdisciplinary Initiatives this year. The President’s increased commitment to the Consortium allows us to expand our work and move to the next level of excellence. Through the Presidential Initiative, we will take on the following projects in the coming year: • launching the Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, a peer-reviewed multidisciplinary journal edited by University of Minnesota faculty and Law students; • bringing a Visiting Senior Scholar to campus for one semester each year to teach and share ideas on the societal implications of the life sciences; Prof. Susan Wolf, Director and Chair. • increasing the capacity to seek and manage externally funded grants; • directly supporting work on the implications of the life sciences by Consortium member centers or graduate/professional programs participating in the Joint Degree Program; and • continuing all programming and events, bringing to campus eminent scholars and national leaders in these fields. Both the Consortium and Joint Degree Program saw continued success in 2003-04. The Consortium added 2 member centers in 2003-04: Prof. Mary Jo Kreitzer’s Center for Spirituality and Healing and Profs. James Anderson’s and Deborah Swackhamer’s Water Resources Center. Our new Executive Committee allowed us to take better advantage of Consortium and Joint Degree Program expertise by broadening leadership of our intellectual work. We also hosted our first visiting scholar, Prof. William Sage from Columbia University. We submitted 3 grant proposals, while working on an NIH grant on the implications of haplotype mapping of the human genome for social categories of race and ethnicity. The Joint Degree Program welcomed 7 new students in Fall 2003 and will welcome 6 more in Fall 2004 for a total of 22 students. We added a JD/MS and JD/PhD with the graduate program in Natural Resources Science & Management. We now offer 21 degree combinations and a choice of 3 graduate minors: Bioethics, Human Genetics, and Bioinformatics. Our programming made dramatic advances as well. In 2003-04 we presented a spectacular roster of speakers Prof. Jim Chen, Director of Special Projects. on challenges in human subjects research in our Faegre & Benson Lecture Series on Law, Health & the Life Sciences. Our Lunch Series on the Societal Implications of the Life Sciences focused on agricultural and environmental ethics. We also offered a national conference on “Environmental Threats to Children’s Health: Legal and Policy Challenges.” Our annual symposium was a full-day event on “Intellectual Property Rights for the Public Good: Obligations of U.S. Universities to Developing Countries.” And with the Center for Bioethics, we launched the new Deinard Memorial Lecture Series on Law & Medicine. We are particularly proud that our programming is now yielding scholarly publications, including published symposia from both the conference and full-day symposium. In 2004-05 we will again present 10 events: 3 presentations in the Lecture Series addressing genomics, stem cell research, and biotechnology; 4 presentations in the Lunch Series focusing on medical devices and innovation; a conference on science and politics; an open-source symposium; and a second Deinard Memorial Lecture on Law & Medicine. The Consortium and Joint Degree Program are now well established. Both programs enjoy a national reputation. Thanks to Presidential Initiative funding, we are moving to a new level of productivity. Our excitement is tremendous as we tackle what remain the most challenging issues of our time, those issues at the intersection, of law, ethics, policy, and the life
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Law Deans' Release Statement on Remarks of Cully Stimson Regarding Lawyers for Detainees
    January 15, 2007 Statement of Law Deans* We, the undersigned law deans, are appalled by the January 11, 2007 statement of Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Charles “Cully” Stimson, criticizing law firms for their pro bono representation of suspected terrorist detainees and encouraging corporate executives to force these law firms to choose between their pro bono and paying clients. As law deans and professors, we find Secretary Stimson’s statement to be contrary to basic tenets of American law. We teach our students that lawyers have a professional obligation to ensure that even the most despised and unpopular individuals and groups receive zealous and effective legal representation. Our American legal tradition has honored lawyers who, despite their personal beliefs, have zealously represented mass murderers, suspected terrorists, and Nazi marchers. At this moment in time, when our courts have endorsed the right of the Guantanamo detainees to be heard in courts of law, it is critical that qualified lawyers provide effective representation to these individuals. By doing so, these lawyers protect not only the rights of the detainees, but also our shared constitutional principles. In a free and democratic society, government officials should not encourage intimidation of or retaliation against lawyers who are fulfilling their pro bono obligations. We urge the Administration promptly and unequivocally to repudiate Secretary Stimson’s remarks. Sincerely, Gail B. Agrawal Dean and Professor of Law, University of Kansas School of Law T. Alexander Aleinikoff Dean, Georgetown University Law Center Peter C. Alexander Dean and Professor of Law Southern Illinois University School of Law James J. Alfini President and Dean South Texas College of Law Michelle J.
    [Show full text]
  • February 14, 2007 Honorable Patrick J. Leahy, Chairman Senate
    February 14, 2007 Honorable Patrick J. Leahy, Chairman Senate Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate 433 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510-4502 Dear Chairman Leahy, We write in support of Chief Justice John Roberts’ call for an increase in the compensation of federal judges. As the Chief Justice showed in his recent report, although the average U.S. worker’s wages have risen 17.8% in real terms since 1969, federal judicial pay has actually declined 23.9% after inflation over the same period. Indeed, federal trial judges now earn less than some law school graduates earn in their first year of private practice. In calling for an immediate and substantial increase in judicial pay, the National Commission on the Public Service (the Volcker Commission) concluded a few years ago that "judicial salaries are the most egregious example of the failure of federal compensation policies" and noted that judicial salaries lag behind the salaries of other nonprofit leaders with whom judges might be compared. This is a grave problem because our judiciary is an essential guardian of our freedom, and we need the most capable people to serve, without regard to their personal financial capabilities. We also want judges to consider the bench to be an insulated position from which they are free to make unpopular but necessary decisions to uphold the Constitution. If judges expect that they will have to leave the bench eventually for financial reasons, the independence of the judiciary is compromised. To show the importance of an independent judiciary, Chief Justice Roberts quotes Alexander Hamilton: “The independence of the judges once destroyed, the constitution is gone, it is a dead letter: it is a vapor which the breath of faction in a moment may dissipate.” We cannot allow that to happen.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2005–2006
    Annual Report 2005–2006 Highlights from 2005–2006 • 11 new JDP enrollees • New gifts for Deinard • Lunch Series on energy • 12 intramural grants awarded for a total of 31 students Memorial Lecture Series and the environment • Progress on NIH-funded project • First Consortium Visiting on Law & Medicine on research ethics • First JD/MD students starting • Conference on terrorist threats Professor named • 2006 Deinard Memorial Lecture to the food supply • Proposal on nanotechnology • 5 new JDP graduates • 2 new Advisory Board members on science in the courtroom • Symposium on risks posed by funded by NSF • New Concentration in • Provost Sullivan named leader of • Lecture Series on the new biomedical technologies • Law School ranked in top 10 Health Law & Bioethics Consortium Presidential Initiative implications of neuroscience • MJLST volume 7 published in Healthcare Law by • New Project Manager appointed U.S. News & World Report 2005 – 2006 Events Tuesday, October 18, 2005 Tuesday, February 7, 2006 Lunch Series on the Societal Implications Lunch Series on the Societal Implications of the Life Sciences of the Life Sciences Prof. Daniel Kammen Prof. Richard Howarth (University of California, Berkeley) (Dartmouth College) “Changing Energy Policy to Benefit “Climate Change and Intergenerational the Environment and Human Health” Fairness: Reconciling Ethics and Economics” Wednesday, November 2, 2005 Lecture Series on Law, Health Wednesday, March 1, 2006 & the Life Sciences Lecture Series on Law, Health Prof. Michael Gazzaniga & the Life Sciences (Dartmouth College) Prof. Martha Farah “The Ethical Brain” (University of Pennsylvania) Commentators: Profs. Lawrence Charnas, “Developmental Neuroethics: Carl Elliott (University of Minnesota) Neuroscience, Childhood and Society” Commentators: Donald Brunnquell (Children’s Hospitals and Clinics Thursday, November 10, 2005 of Minneapolis/St.
    [Show full text]
  • Mystery and the Mastery of the Judicial Power, The
    Missouri Law Review Volume 59 Issue 2 Spring 1994 Article 1 Spring 1994 Mystery and the Mastery of the Judicial Power, The Jim Chen Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Jim Chen, Mystery and the Mastery of the Judicial Power, The, 59 MO. L. REV. (1994) Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol59/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Missouri Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Chen: Chen: Mystery and the Mastery MISSOURI LAW REVIEW VOLUME 59 SPRING 1994 NUMBER 2 The Mystery and the Mastery of the Judicial Power Jim Chen* What do law clerks do at the Supreme Court? One day this question took me entirely by surprise. Not because of its substance: I have repeatedly answered this question ever since Justice Clarence Thomas invited me to serve as his clerk for October Term 1992. As with so much else in law, context had triumphed over content. While teaching my first-year legislation class at the University of Minnesota, I asked a student to resolve the apparent tension between Justice Antonin Scalia's willingness to consult The FederalistPapers as the "legislative history" of the United States Constitution' and Justice Scalia's outspoken opposition to the use of ordinary legislative history in * Associate Professor of Law, University of Minnesota Law School; law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas, October Term 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • 201-4102 424 JRCB, BYU Law School, Provo, Utah 84602 HARVARD LAW SCHOOL, JD, Summa Cum Laude, June 1
    [email protected] (801) 201-4102 LISA GROW SUN 424 JRCB, BYU Law School, Provo, Utah 84602 EDUCATION HARVARD LAW SCHOOL, J.D., summa cum laude, June 1997 Honors: 1997 Fay Diploma winner (awarded to top graduate) 1995 and 1996 Sears Prize Winner (awarded to top two students in class) First student to graduate summa cum laude in fifteen years First woman to graduate summa cum laude, and first woman to graduate first in class Activities: Harvard Law Review, Notes Chair Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, Senior Editor Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Editor Harvard Defenders UNIVERSITY OF UTAH, B.S., Chemistry, summa cum laude, June 1994 Honors: United States Presidential Scholar Barry M. Goldwater Scholar in Mathematics, Science & Engineering University of Utah Presidential Scholar, Kennecott Scholar American Chemical Society and CRC Chemistry Achievement Awards GPA 4.0/4.0 Activities: ACCESS science scholarship and research program Co-Director, Students Against Hunger, Bennion Community Service Center Community issues columnist, The Daily Utah Chronicle WORK EXPERIENCE J. REUBEN CLARK LAW SCHOOL, BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY, Provo, UT 2008 – Present Stephen L Richards Professor of Law. Teach Disaster Law, Constitutional Law, and Torts. Scholarly work focuses on disaster law. TEMPLE/TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY MASTERS IN LAW PROGRAM, Beijing, China Fall 2006 Visiting Professor. Taught United States Civil Procedure to Chinese judges, government officials, and other legal professionals earning their masters in law. STANFORD LAW SCHOOL, Palo Alto, CA 1999 – 2001, 2004 Lecturer in Law. Taught Administrative Law and Federal Jurisdiction. CHAMBERS OF THE HONORABLE JUSTICE ANTHONY M. KENNEDY 1998 – 1999 UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • James Ming Chen
    JAMES MING CHEN An attorney, professor of law, and data scientist with three decades of experience in the law of regulated industries, economics, and regulatory policy, James Ming Chen holds the Justin Smith Morrill Chair in Law at Michigan State University. In addition, he is executive vice president and chief data science officer of Silver Leaf Capital LLC and holds visiting appointments at the Universities of Angers (France) and Zagreb (Croatia). Justin Smith Morrill Chair in Law and Professor of Law Michigan State University College of Law 648 North Shaw Lane East Lansing, MI 48824 (517) 432-6891 [email protected] http://www.law.msu.edu/faculty_staff/profile.php?prof=880 http://ssrn.com/author=68651 http://bit.ly/JimChenScholar EXPERIENCE 2013- Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan Justin Smith Morrill Chair in Law and Professor of Law Subjects taught (since 1993): administrative law, agricultural law, antitrust, constitutional law, consumer law and household finance, climate change law and policy, criminal law, environmental economics, environmental law, food and drug law, industrial policy, intellectual property (agricultural biotechnology), introduction to the regulatory state, legislation, natural resources law, regulated industries, remedies, and state and local taxation 2020- Silver Leaf Capital LLC New York, N.Y. Executive Vice President and Chief Data Scientist 2007-13 University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky Dean and Professor of Law, 2007-12 Professor of Law, 2012-13 Highlights: Increased average annual
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Degree Program Consortium on Law and Values
    Annual Report 2004-2005 Joint Degree Program in Law, Health, & the Life Sciences™ Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences™ Highlights from 2004–2005: • 1st volume of Minnesota • 11 intramural Journal of Law, Science grants awarded & Technology published • New Associate Director • Success on NIH grant of Research & proposal on Education appointed research ethics • 24 JDP applicants • 2 new Consortium & 5 new JDP enrollees members • 1 new JDP graduate • Lecture Series on the • Publication from stem cell debate intellectual property • Lunch Series on medical symposium in MJLST devices & innovation • Publication from • Deinard Memorial conference on racial Lecture on genetics & ethnic categories in Nature Genetics • Conference on racial & ethnic categories • Publication from in biomedical research bioethics conference in Hastings Center Report • Open-submission symposium on the • New Visiting Consortium future of law & science Professorship • Cosponsorship of bioethics conference 2004–2005 Events Tuesday, November 2, 2004 Tuesday, April 5, 2005 Lunch Series on the Societal Implications Lunch Series on the Societal Implications of the Life Sciences of the Life Sciences Prof. Michael Lysaght, Brown University Alan Milstein, Esq., Sherman, Silverstein, “Risk, Reason & Regulation of Medical Kohl, Rose & Podolsky Devices” “Human Subjects Protection: A Plaintiff’s Perspective” Wednesday, December 8, 2004 Lecture Series on Law, Health Monday, April 18, 2005 & the Life Sciences Annual Conference Prof. Evan Snyder, Burnham Institute “Proposals for the Responsible Use of and University of California, San Diego Racial & Ethnic Categories in Biomedical “Stem Cell Biology: Good Ethics Depend Research: Where Do We Go From Here?” on Good Facts” Commentators: Profs. Paul Tuite, Jeffrey Kahn, Wednesday, April 20, 2005 University of Minnesota Lecture Series on Law, Health & the Life Sciences Wednesday, February 2, 2005 Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Rosenthal 2007
    ES_BL_8-3 13/3/07 11:50 Page iii Biodiversity and the Law Intellectual Property, Biotechnology and Traditional Knowledge Edited by Charles R. McManis London • Sterling, VA ES_BL_8-3 13/3/07 11:50 Page iv First published by Earthscan in the UK and USA in 2007 Copyright © Charles R. McManis, 2007 All rights reserved ISBN: 978-1-84407-349-8 hardback Typeset by MapSet Ltd, Gateshead, UK Printed and bound in the UK by TJ International Ltd, Padstow Cover design by Andrew Corbett For a full list of publications please contact: Earthscan 8–12 Camden High Street London, NW1 0JH, UK Tel: +44 (0)20 7387 8558 Fax: +44 (0)20 7387 8998 Email: [email protected] Web: www.earthscan.co.uk 22883 Quicksilver Drive, Sterling, VA 20166-2012, USA Earthscan is an imprint of James and James (Science Publishers) Ltd and publishes in associ- ation with the International Institute for Environment and Development A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data has been applied for This publication has been printed on FSC-certified and totally chlorine-free paper. FSC (The Forest Stewardship Council) is an international network to promote responsible management of the world’s forests. ES_BL_8-3 13/3/07 11:50 Page v Contents List of Figures and Tables ix List of Chapter Authors and Conference Participants xi Acknowledgements xxxi List of Acronyms and Abbreviations xxxii Chapter 1 Biodiversity, Biotechnology and Traditional Knowledge Protection: Law, Science and Practice 1 Charles R. McManis Part I Biodiversity: What are We Losing and Why – And What is to be Done? Chapter 2 The Epic of Evolution and the Problem of Biodiversity Loss 27 Peter Raven Chapter 3 Naturalizing Morality 35 Ursula Goodenough Chapter 4 Across the Apocalypse on Horseback: Biodiversity Loss and the Law 42 Jim Chen Chapter 5 Impact of the Convention on Biological Diversity: The Lessons of Ten Years of Experience with Models for Equitable Sharing of Benefits 58 James S.
    [Show full text]
  • COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY in Till CITY Or N[W YORK
    COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN Till CITY or N[W YORK 'CIIUOI (H lAW February 14,2007 Honorable Patrick J. Leahy, Chairman Senate Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate 433 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510-4502 Dear Chairman Leahy, We write in support of Chief Justice John Roberts' call for an increase in the compensation offederal judges. As the Chief Justice showed in his recent report, although the average U.S. worker's wages have risen 17.8% in real terms since 1969, federal judicial pay has actually declined 23.9% after inflation over the same period. Indeed, federal trial judges now earn less than some law school graduates earn in their first year of private practice. In calling for an immediate and substantial increase in judicial pay, the National Commission on the Public Service (the VoIcker Commission) concluded a few years ago that "judicial salaries are the most egregious example of the failure of federal compensation policies" and noted that judicial salaries lag behind the salaries of other nonprofit leaders with whom judges might be compared. This is a grave problem because our judiciary is an essential guardian of our freedom, and we need the most capable people to serve, without regard to their personal financial capabilities. We also want judges to consider the bench to be an insulated position from which they are free to make unpopular but necessary decisions to uphold the Constitution. If judges expect that they will have to leave the bench eventually for financial reasons, the independence of the judiciary is compromised. To show the importance of an independent judiciary, Chief Justice Roberts quotes Alexander Hamilton: "The independence of the judges once destroyed, the constitution is gone, it is a dead letter: it is a vapor which the breath of faction in a moment may dissipate." We cannot allow that to happen.
    [Show full text]