Rdna Research, the Human Genome Project, and the National Nanotechnology Initiative

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rdna Research, the Human Genome Project, and the National Nanotechnology Initiative The Expansion of Science Policy in the United States in Three Cases: rDNA Research, The Human Genome Project, and the National Nanotechnology Initiative by Matthew B. Sullivan A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Sociology) in The University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Renee Anspach, Co-Chair Associate Professor Sandra Levitsky, Co-Chair Professor Jason Owen-Smith Associate Professor Shobita Parthasarathy Matthew B. Sullivan [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6734-6792 © Matthew B. Sullivan 2018 DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this dissertation to everyone who got a late start. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank and acknowledge first, my committee – particularly Sandra Levitsky and Renee Anspach – who have been of invaluable service along the way. I also want to acknowledge the help of David Guston and Andrew Maynard, who helped me get this project started. Thanks are due, as well, to the Social Movements Workshop, the Medical Sociology Workshop, and the Science and Democracy Network. Special thanks to Katie Hauschildt, Kathy Lin, and Dan Hirschman for being fantastic colleagues always ready with valuable insights and to Everett Peachey and Cheyney Dobson for keeping me relatively sane throughout. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION ...................................................................................................................ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. iii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................... vii LIST OF GRAPHS......................................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES ..........................................................................................................ix LIST OF APPENDICES ................................................................................................... x ABSTRACT .....................................................................................................................xi Chapter I ......................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 Expansion of Science Policy .................................................................................... 3 Science, Policy and American Liberal Democracy ................................................... 3 Science and Trust in The Risk Society ..................................................................... 9 Autonomy ............................................................................................................... 16 Credibility ............................................................................................................... 21 Expertise ................................................................................................................ 23 Political Imaginaries, Civic Epistemology, and Public Reason ............................... 28 The Study and Research Design ........................................................................... 35 Research Design ............................................................................................ 35 Methods of Data Collection ............................................................................. 38 iv Summary of Dissertation Chapters ........................................................................ 41 Chapter II ...................................................................................................................... 44 The Asilomar Conference and Human Genome Project ........................................ 44 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 44 rDNA Research and the rDNA Debate ................................................................... 45 A Voluntary Moratorium.......................................................................................... 47 Asilomar ................................................................................................................. 52 The Public Emerges ............................................................................................... 61 The Importance of Asilomar ................................................................................... 70 The ELSI Working Group of the Human Genome Project ...................................... 71 Policy Expansion: New Experts .............................................................................. 76 After Watson: Disciplining ELSI .............................................................................. 82 Imagining Issues .................................................................................................... 87 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 97 Chapter III ................................................................................................................... 100 The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Societal and Ethical Implications of Nanotechnology ................................................................................................... 100 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 100 Nanotechnology and The NNI .............................................................................. 101 Societal and Ethical Implications of Nanotechnology (SEIN) and Public Engagement ......................................................................................................... 105 The Value of the NNI ............................................................................................ 113 The Public Threat to the Nanotechnology Revolution .......................................... 124 Acceptable Concerns and New Experts ............................................................... 131 v Conclusion ........................................................................................................... 141 Chapter IV .................................................................................................................. 144 Upstream Public Engagement in the NNI ............................................................. 144 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 144 Enrolling Scholars ................................................................................................ 145 The Events ........................................................................................................... 152 Competing, Coexisting and Complimentary Goals ............................................... 153 Constructing Publics, Constructing Issues ........................................................... 159 The Outcomes of Engagement ............................................................................ 170 The End of Public Engagement in Nanotechnology ............................................. 182 Conclusion ........................................................................................................... 188 Chapter V ................................................................................................................... 190 Conclusion ........................................................................................................... 190 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................. 203 BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................... 213 vi LIST OF TABLES TABLE I.1 Temporal Typology of Risks 10 I.2 Cases and Analytical Categories 38 IV.1 Nanotechnology Deliberative Public Engagement Events 153 V.1 Cases and Analytical Categories Revisited 192 V.2 Expected Approaches to Ethical Concerns and Publics 200 vii LIST OF GRAPHS GRAPH II.1 Funded ELSI Projects Involving Publics 91 II.2 Number of ELSI Projects by NIH Category 93 II.3 Number of Annual New ELSI Projects by NIH Category 96 II.4 Funding of New ELSI Projects by Research Type 96 II.5: Funding for Core ELSI Issues Defined by NHGRI 97 III.1 NIH and NSF Budgets from 1985-2015 in 2015 Constant Dollars 115 III.2 Science Funding by Discipline 1970-2016 in 2016 Constant Dollars 116 viii LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE III.1 Agencies in the National Nanotechnology Initiative 105 IV.1 Program Component Areas from 2004 NNI Strategic Plan 184 IV.2 Program Component Areas from 2007 NNI Strategic Plan 185 IV.3 Program Component Areas from 2015 NNI Strategic Plan 186 ix LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A. Descriptions of Nanotechnology Public Engagement Events 203 Southwestern Nano-Dialogue 203 Midwestern Nanotechnology Deliberation 206 National Emerging Technologies Conference 207 Eastern Environmental Risk Forums 208 B. List of Future Nanotechnology Applications 210 x ABSTRACT In recent decades, the agencies tasked with science funding and science policy in the U.S. have increasingly embraced new ideas about the role and duty of science in society. They have opened up to the idea that science and technoscience -- the intersection
Recommended publications
  • Cultural Anthropology Through the Lens of Wikipedia: Historical Leader Networks, Gender Bias, and News-Based Sentiment
    Cultural Anthropology through the Lens of Wikipedia: Historical Leader Networks, Gender Bias, and News-based Sentiment Peter A. Gloor, Joao Marcos, Patrick M. de Boer, Hauke Fuehres, Wei Lo, Keiichi Nemoto [email protected] MIT Center for Collective Intelligence Abstract In this paper we study the differences in historical World View between Western and Eastern cultures, represented through the English, the Chinese, Japanese, and German Wikipedia. In particular, we analyze the historical networks of the World’s leaders since the beginning of written history, comparing them in the different Wikipedias and assessing cultural chauvinism. We also identify the most influential female leaders of all times in the English, German, Spanish, and Portuguese Wikipedia. As an additional lens into the soul of a culture we compare top terms, sentiment, emotionality, and complexity of the English, Portuguese, Spanish, and German Wikinews. 1 Introduction Over the last ten years the Web has become a mirror of the real world (Gloor et al. 2009). More recently, the Web has also begun to influence the real world: Societal events such as the Arab spring and the Chilean student unrest have drawn a large part of their impetus from the Internet and online social networks. In the meantime, Wikipedia has become one of the top ten Web sites1, occasionally beating daily newspapers in the actuality of most recent news. Be it the resignation of German national soccer team captain Philipp Lahm, or the downing of Malaysian Airlines flight 17 in the Ukraine by a guided missile, the corresponding Wikipedia page is updated as soon as the actual event happened (Becker 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • PHILIP HANDLER August 13, 1917-December 29, 1981
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES P H I L I P H ANDLER 1917—1981 A Biographical Memoir by EMIL L. SMITH AND RO B ERT L. HILL Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1985 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON D.C. PHILIP HANDLER August 13, 1917-December 29, 1981 BY EMIL L. SMITH AND ROBERT L. HILL HILIP HANDLER was the eighteenth president of the PNational Academy of Sciences and served two consecu- tive six-year terms from 1969 to 1981. His tenure was marked by a rapid growth of the Academy and by a great expansion and reorganization of the work of the National Research Council. It was also a period of controversy and political turbulence in the nation, and the role of the Academy in public affairs increased considerably. The work and character of the Academy will likely long be influenced by the many changes that occurred in these years. Philip Handler was born in New York City on August 13, 1917, the first child and oldest son of Lena Heisen Handler and Jacob Handler. His mother, one often children, was the daughter of a chicken farmer in Norma, a town in southern New Jersey. The life of his father, who came from central Europe, represented an almost typical American success story of that immigrant generation, and served as an exam- ple to his family of the rewards that come from hard work, self-education, and determination.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae CAROLYN J
    Curriculum Vitae CAROLYN J. TUCKER HALPERN Department of Maternal and Child Health Office: (919) 966-5981 (MCH) 401 Rosenau, CB 7445 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill email: [email protected] Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7445 Education PhD 1982 Developmental Psychology, University of Houston–Central Campus, Houston, TX. MA 1979 Developmental Psychology, University of Houston–Central Campus, Houston, TX. BS 1976 Psychology, University of Houston–Central Campus, Houston, TX. (Summa cum laude with University and Departmental Honors) Professional Experience 2017- present Faculty Fellow, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 2015 - present Chair, Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 2014 – 2015 Interim Chair, Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 2013 – 2014 Vice-Chair, Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 2011 – present Professor with Tenure, Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 2004 - 2011 Associate Professor with Tenure, Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 2000 - 2019 Faculty Fellow, Center for Developmental Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 1998 - present Faculty Fellow, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Florence P. Haseltine, Ph.D., M.D. Activities of the Foundation While Bringing Recognition to a Worthy Woman in Medicine
    The Foundation for the History of Women in Medicine The 14th Annual The Foundation for the History of Women in Medicine, established in 1998, was founded on the belief that knowing the historical past is a powerful force in shaping Alma Dea Morani, M.D. the future. Though relatively young, The Foundation for the History of Women in Medicine has made significant accomplishments in promoting the history of Renaissance Woman Award women in medicine. The Alma Dea Morani Award continues to provide an annual centerpiece to the Dr. Florence P. Haseltine, Ph.D., M.D. activities of The Foundation while bringing recognition to a worthy woman in medicine. This year we honor Florence P. Haseltine, Ph.D., M.D., Emerita Director, Center for Population Research at the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Public Health (NICHD) of the National Institutes of Health. The Foundation’s Research Fellowships, offered in conjunction with the The Archives for Women in Medicine (AWM) at Countway Library’s Center for the History of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, continue to be competitive. The 2013 recipient, Dr. Ciara Breathnach, lectures in history and has published on Irish socio-economic and health histories in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Her research focuses on how the poor experienced, engaged with and negotiated medical services in Ireland and in North America from 1860-1912. Dr. Breathnach’s focused study of record of the migratory waves against trends in medical and social modernity processes, are held at the Archives for Women in Medicine at the Countway Library and will be weighed against other socio-economic evidence to establish how problematic groups such as the Irish poor affected and shaped medical care in Boston.
    [Show full text]
  • Anne Buckingham Young
    BK-SFN-NEUROSCIENCE-131211-13_Young.indd 554 17/04/14 2:26 PM Anne Buckingham Young BORN: Evanston, Illinois December 30, 1947 EDUCATION: Vassar College, Summa Cum Laude, AB (1969) Johns Hopkins University Medical School, MD (1973) Johns Hopkins University Medical School, PhD (1974) APPOINTMENTS: Assistant, Full Professor of Neurology, University of Michigan (1978–1991) Julieanne Dorn Professor of Neurology, Harvard Medical School (1991–2012) Chief, Neurology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital (1991–2012) Distinguished Julieanne Dorn Professor of Neurology, Harvard Medical School (2012–present) HONORS AND AWARDS (SELECTED): Member, Institute of Medicine (1994) Fellow, American Academy of Arts and Sciences (1995) Dean’s Award for Support and Advancement of Women Faculty, Harvard Medical School (1999) Marion Spence Faye Award for Women in Medicine (2001) President, American Neurological Association (2001–2003) President, Society for Neuroscience (2003–2004) Fellow, Royal College of Physicians, England (2005) Milton Wexler Award, Hereditary Disease Foundation (2006) Johns Hopkins Medical School Distinguished Alumni Award (2007) Vassar College Distinguished Alumni Award (2010) As a graduate student, Young provided the first biochemical evidence of glutamate as a neurotransmitter of the cerebellar granule cells. She developed biochemical techniques to measure inhibitory amino acid neurotransmitter receptors in the mammalian brain and spinal cord. As a faculty member at the University of Michigan, Young and her late husband (John B. Penney, Jr.) established the first biochemical data that glutamate was the neurotransmitter of the corticostriatal, corticobulbar, and corticospinal pathways. They developed film-based techniques for quantitative receptor autoradiography. They also provided evidence for their most widely cited model of basal ganglia function.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter/Spring 2020
    CAUGHT IN A CYCLONE RECORD BREAKER A DECADE OF DECIBELS SHARKS IN MOTION PAGE 10 PAGE 12 PAGE 22 PAGE 38 NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY WINTER/SPRING 2020 DR.Perspectives PALLAVI PATEL COLLEGE OF HEALTH CARE SCIENCES Building BridgesPage 3 SHARKS DO MORE THAN SURVIVE. THEY THRIVE. 6 10 DR. PALLAVI PATEL COLLEGE OF HEALTH CARE SCIENCES DEPARTMENTS AND PROGRAMS Anesthesiology Audiology Cardiopulmonary Sciences Respiratory Therapy Health and Human Performance Athletic Training • Exercise and Sport Science Health Science Bachelor in Health Science • Cardiovascular Sonography Doctor in Health Science • Doctor in Philosophy Master in Health Science • Medical Sonography M.H.S./D.H.S. in Health Science Occupational Therapy Physical Therapy Physician Assistant Speech-Language Pathology The college invites alumni to share a class note or story idea. The next submission deadline is March 28, 2020. Please include a high-resolution, original photo in a jpeg or tiff format. Please update your contact information regularly by emailing us. We look forward to hearing from you. Contact us at [email protected]. TABLE of Contents FEATURES 3 Building Bridges 8 Summer Spotlight 10 Caught in a Cyclone 12 Record Breaker DEPARTMENTS 10 2 Dean’s Message 16 Program News LIFE IN THE FAST LANE • Physician Assistant—Orlando / 16 WIN-WIN • Physician Assistant—Orlando / 18 AN ENRICHING EXPERIENCE • Speech-Language Pathology—Fort Lauderdale / 20 22 Student Perspectives 16 A DECADE OF DECIBELS • Audiology—Fort Lauderdale / 22 INTERNATIONAL INTERNSHIP • Physical
    [Show full text]
  • An Interview with Dr. Nancy Wexler: Discovering the Huntington Disease Gene By: Kristin Darwin One Morning in 1968, Dr
    InsightsTM HD periodical A Huntington disease research Issue No 3 -- Fall 2012 Research Round-Up Antisense Meet Isis HD Research in Chile Dr. Lise Munsie Oligoneucleotides Pharmaceuticals Dr. Claudio Hetz and overviews recent Dr. Emily Mitchell Senior Vice President Dr. Rene Vidal discuss developments in HD Sontag overviews the Dr. C. Frank Bennett interventions that may research. CHDI Highlights promises and discusses the company’s alleviate secretory Page 3 Notes on this year’s challenges of using drug development pathway stress in HD. presentations at the Status Report: ASOs for gene efforts using ASOs. Page 11 CHDI HD Clinical Trials silencing. Page 8 Therapeutics At a glance Page 6 Conference in Palm information on Springs, California. current clinical trials Page 4 in HD. Page 5 An Interview with Dr. Nancy Wexler: Discovering the Huntington Disease Gene By: Kristin Darwin One morning in 1968, Dr. Nancy Wexler’s mother, Leonore Wexler, had jury duty in downtown Los Angeles. As Leonore crossed the street on the way to the courthouse, a policeman yelled to her, “How can you be drunk so early in the morning?” Leonore realized that she had been staggering – an obvious sign that something was wrong. Soon after, Leonore was diagnosed with Huntington disease (HD). Nancy Wexler, who was pursuing a PhD in clinical psychology at the time of her mother’s diagnosis, devoted her life to the study of HD. In 1979, Wexler and her colleagues began a research project in Venezuela to search for the HD gene. They surmised that finding the gene was the most direct route to the development of treatments, even cures! They developed a pedigree of over 18,000 individuals and collected more than 4,000 blood samples from the largest extended family with HD ever to have been discovered.
    [Show full text]
  • National Academy of Sciences July 1, 1979 Officers
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES JULY 1, 1979 OFFICERS Term expires President-PHILIP HANDLER June 30, 1981 Vice-President-SAUNDERS MAC LANE June 30, 1981 Home Secretary-BRYCE CRAWFORD,JR. June 30, 1983 Foreign Secretary-THOMAS F. MALONE June 30, 1982 Treasurer-E. R. PIORE June 30, 1980 Executive Officer Comptroller Robert M. White David Williams COUNCIL Abelson, Philip H. (1981) Markert,C. L. (1980) Berg, Paul (1982) Nierenberg,William A. (1982) Berliner, Robert W. (1981) Piore, E. R. (1980) Bing, R. H. (1980) Ranney, H. M. (1980) Crawford,Bryce, Jr. (1983) Simon, Herbert A. (1981) Friedman, Herbert (1982) Solow, R. M. (1980) Handler, Philip (1981) Thomas, Lewis (1982) Mac Lane, Saunders (1981) Townes, Charles H. (1981) Malone, Thomas F. (1982) Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 SECTIONS The Academyis divided into the followingSections, to which membersare assigned at their own choice: (11) Mathematics (31) Engineering (12) Astronomy (32) Applied Biology (13) Physics (33) Applied Physical and (14) Chemistry Mathematical Sciences (15) Geology (41) Medical Genetics Hema- (16) Geophysics tology, and Oncology (21) Biochemistry (42) Medical Physiology, En- (22) Cellularand Develop- docrinology,and Me- mental Biology tabolism (23) Physiological and Phar- (43) Medical Microbiology macologicalSciences and Immunology (24) Neurobiology (51) Anthropology (25) Botany (52) Psychology (26) Genetics (53) Social and Political Sci- (27) Population Biology, Evo- ences lution, and Ecology (54) Economic Sciences In the alphabetical list of members,the numbersin parentheses, followingyear of election, indicate the respective Class and Section of the member. CLASSES The members of Sections are grouped in the following Classes: I. Physical and Mathematical Sciences (Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16).
    [Show full text]
  • Members of Groups Central to the Scientists' Debates About Rdna
    International Dimensions of Ethics Education in Science and Engineering Case Study Series: Asilomar Conference on Laboratory Precautions Appendix C: Members of Groups Central to the Scientists’ Debates about rDNA Research 1973-76 M.J. Peterson Version 1, June 2010 Signers of Singer-Söll Letter 1973 Maxine Singer Dieter Söll Signers of Berg Letter 1974 Paul Berg David Baltimore Herbert Boyer Stanley Cohen Ronald Davis David S. Hogness Daniel Nathans Richard O. Roblin III James Watson Sherman Weissman Norton D. Zinder Organizing Committee for the Asilomar Conference David Baltimore Paul Berg Sydney Brenner Richard O. Roblin III Maxine Singer This case was created by the International Dimensions of Ethics Education in Science and Engineering (IDEESE) Project at the University of Massachusetts Amherst with support from the National Science Foundation under grant number 0734887. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. More information about the IDEESE and copies of its modules can be found at http://www.umass.edu/sts/ethics. This case should be cited as: M.J. Peterson. 2010. “Asilomar Conference on Laboratory Precautions When Conducting Recombinant DNA Research.” International Dimensions of Ethics Education in Science and Engineering. Available www.umass.edu/sts/ethics. © 2010 IDEESE Project Appendix C Working Groups for the Asilomar Conference Plasmids Richard Novick (Chair) Royston C. Clowes (Institute for Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Dallas) Stanley N. Cohen Roy Curtiss III Stanley Falkow Eukaryotes Donald Brown (Chair) Sydney Brenner Robert H. Burris (Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin) Dana Carroll (Department of Embryology, Carnegie Institution, Baltimore) Ronald W.
    [Show full text]
  • NINR History Book
    NINR NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NURSING RESEARCH PHILIP L. CANTELON, PhD NINR: Bringing Science To Life National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) with Philip L. Cantelon National Institute of Nursing Research National Institutes of Health Publication date: September 2010 NIH Publication No. 10-7502 Library of Congress Control Number 2010929886 ISBN 978-0-9728874-8-9 Printed and bound in the United States of America TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface The National Institute of Nursing Research at NIH: Celebrating Twenty-five Years of Nursing Science .........................................v Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................ix Chapter One Origins of the National Institute of Nursing Research .................................1 Chapter Two Launching Nursing Science at NIH ..............................................................39 Chapter Three From Center to Institute: Nursing Research Comes of Age .....................65 Chapter Four From Nursing Research to Nursing Science ............................................. 113 Chapter Five Speaking the Language of Science ............................................................... 163 Epilogue The Transformation of Nursing Science ..................................................... 209 Appendices A. Oral History Interviews .......................................................................... 237 B. Photo Credits ........................................................................................... 239
    [Show full text]
  • May 30, 1989, NIH Record, Vol. XLI, No. 11
    May 30. 1989 Vol. XU No. 11 U.S. Departmenr of Health and H uman Services National Institutes of Health NIH's 'Legislative Father' Director Reflects on 7½ Years at NIH Bldg. 31 Renamed; ll)' Rich McManus Honors Claude Pepper Par/ one ofa two-part ,eries Under rainy skies char were brighcened Sometime chis sumrner, NIH direccor Dr. purchasing power. During his 7 'Ii-year rerm, considerably by the music of rhe Marine Band, ]tunes B. Wyngaarden will relinquish whar rhc institutes have realized a 35-40 percent Bldg. 31 was recently renamed in honor of many consider the most powerful post in gain in purchasing power. Rep. Claude Denson Pepper (D.-Fla.). The American medicine. He will leave behind a Other statistics salure his dedication to legislative sponsor of all bur one NIH legacy t hat is ac once easily computed and stabilizing and promoting rhc advance of insciruce, Pepper was hailed as NIH's hard ro fathom. biomedical research. Boch the number and "legislative father." Easy co grasp are rhe achievements chat d uration of investigator-initiated research proj­ Hospitalized in recent weeks for a stomach numbers can capture. Arriving as dircccor on ect grams are up, a robust conscrucrion ailment, Pepper, 88, was unahle to attend the Feb. I, I 982 (though nor formally inducted program is under way on campus, vigorous ceremony rededicaring rhe 28-year-old office until Apr. 30), he gave himself the goal of and talented staff occupy virtually all top building. Speaking in his place was Sen. doubling the NIH bL1dget during his term.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles E. Bugg
    Memoir Charles E. Bugg Preface I am a crystallographer. Although my career has allowed me to enjoy a variety of stimulating ventures in science, technology and business, crystallography has always been the foundation of these activities. Crystallography is an incredible scientific discipline that has directly impacted many areas of chemistry, phys­ ics and biology. The importance of this field was formally recognized recently by the United Nations, who declared 2014 as the Year of Crystallography. The tremendous impact of crystallography is exemplified by the fact that 27 Nobel Prizes have now been awarded for scientific achievements directly related to, or involving use of, crys­ tallographic methods and techniques. No other specific scientist discipline has produced such a large number of Nobel Prizes. I have had the joy of interacting closely with several of these Nobel Laureates over the course of my career. I doubt if any other career choice would have pro­ vided me with such stimulation. In 2014, the Year of Crystallography, I was invited by the American Crystallographic Association (ACA) to write my Memoir, which would be archived in the ACA website that covers the history of crystallography. I ended up going overboard, and including much more detail than will ever be of interest to my crystallographic colleagues, thinking that my grandchildren might someday want to read about the wonderful life that our family was allowed to share through the world of crystallography. Fortunate­ ly for my crystallography colleagues, the editors of the ACA abstracted relevant sections of my Memoir for publi­ cation in their quarterly newsletter, "ACA Reflexions", and I have attached the resulting article to my Memoir.
    [Show full text]