Relations Between Immigration and Integration Policies in Europe
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Older People in Germany and the EU 2016
OLDER PEOPLE in Germany and the EU Federal Statistical Office of Germany Published by Photo credits Federal Statistical Office, Wiesbaden Cover image Title © Monkey Business Images / Editing Shutterstock.com Thomas Haustein, Johanna Mischke, Frederike Schönfeld, Ilka Willand Page 9 © iStockphoto.com / vitranc Page 53 © iStockphoto.com / XiXinXing Page 16 © Image Source / Topaz / F1online Page 60 © Peter Atkins - Fotolia.com English version edited by Michaela Raimer, Page 17 © iStockphoto.com / Squaredpixels Page 67 © iStockphoto.com / Kristina Theis Page 27 © Westend61 - Fotolia.com monkeybusinessimages Page 29 © bluedesign - Fotolia.com Page 71 © iStockphoto.com / PeopleImages Design and layout Page 31 © iStockphoto.com / Xavier Arnau Page 73 © runzelkorn - Fotolia.com Federal Statistical Office Page 36 © iStockphoto.com / mheim3011 Page 75 © iStockphoto.com / Published in October 2016 Page 37 © iStockphoto.com / miriam-doerr Christopher Badzioch Page 39 © Lise_Noergel / photocase.de Page 77 © iStockphoto.com / funstock Order number: 0010021-16900-1 Page 40 © iStockphoto.com / budgaugh Page 80 © iconimage - Fotolia.com Page 45 © Statistisches Bundesamt Page 89 © iStockphoto.com / vm Page 46 © iStockphoto.com / Attila Barabas Page 90 © frau.L. / photocase.de Page 49 © iStockphoto.com / Gizelka Page 93 © fusho1d - Fotolia.com Page 49 © iStockphoto.com / Vladyslav Danilin Page 51 © iStockphoto.com / pamspix This brochure was published with the financial support of the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth. -
JLP 16-4 Intro RW-MK Pre-Pub
Right-Wing Populism in Europe & USA: Contesting Politics & Discourse beyond ‘OrbAnism’ and ‘Trumpism’ Ruth Wodak and Michał Krzyżanowski Lancaster University / University of Liverpool 1. (Right-Wing) Populism Old & New: ShAred Ontologies, Recurrent PrActices Through a number of theoretical and empirical contriButions, this Special Issue of the Journal of Language and Politics addresses the recent sudden upsurge of right-wing populist parties (RWPs) in Europe and the USA. It responds to many recent challenges and a variety of ‘discursive shifts’ (Krzyżanowski 2013a, 2018 a,B) and wider dynamics of media and puBlic discourses that have taken place as a result of the upswing of right- wing populism (RWP) across Europe and Beyond (e.g., Feldman and Jackson 2013; Muller 2016; Wodak et al. 2013; Wodak 2013 a,b, 2015 a, 2016, 2017). The papers in the Special Issue cover institutionalised (individual and group) varieties of right-wing populist politics and also transcend a narrowly conceived political realm. Moreover, we investigate the ontology of the current surge of RWP, its state-of-the-art as well and, most importantly, how right-wing populist agendas spread, Become increasingly mediatised and thereBy ‘normalised’ in European and US politics, media and in the wider puBlic spheres (e.g., Wodak 2015 a,B; Link 2014). Indeed, in recent years and months new information about the rise of RWP has dominated the news practically every day. New polls about the possiBle success of such political parties have progressively caused an election scare among mainstream institutions and politicians. The unpredictaBle and unpredicted successes of populists (e.g. Donald Trump in the USA in 2016) have By now transformed anxieties into legitimate apprehension and fear. -
Kroniek 18De Eeuw
periode 1701-1800 Laatst bijgewerkt: 01-12-2007 1701, 18 feb., "Molen Octroij door de Jonckeren van Barneveld gegeven voor 12 jaren tot het oprigten van een paardengrutmolen aan Anthonij van Ede en den watermulder Aelbert Harbertsen, geapprobeert mits sig in het verkoopen reguleerende na de politie der stad Arnhem." bron: Kwartiersrecessen van de Veluwe. 1701, 9 mrt., In een testament wordt ds. Hermanus Altius uit Barneveld als erfgenaam vermeld. bron: GA Amsterdam, notarieel archief, inv.nr. 4248, blz. 118. 1701, 23 jul., Lens Jansen en Evertje Elissen, vrouw van Evert Jansen, wever te Barneveld, worden niet veroordeeld voor overspel door het Hof van Gelre. bronnen: decreet Hof van Gelre, d.d. 23 juli 1701; pleidooiboek Hof, inv.nr. 6136, d.d. 23 juli 1701; dossier 4563/9. 1701, okt., "1699 lidmaat [kerk Garderen] Coenraat Coetius Seger, gestorven 9 Febr. 1699. Beeltjen Hendriks sijn vrouw verdronken in de Put in October 1701." bron: GAB, Collectie Bouwheer. Garderen. 7. Bevolking, personen, geslachten. Geslachten (o.a. Versteeg, Hendriksen, enz.). 1701, 30 nov., In een debiteurenstaat wordt Stam van Wessel uit Barneveld vermeld. bron: GA Amsterdam, notarieel archief, inv.nr. 6318, blz. 202. 1702 Acte, waarbij Dirck van Dompseler aangesteld wordt als schout van Barneveld, nadat zijn vader er afstand van heeft gedaan, mits hij de pandpenningen op het ambt staande, aan zijn vader restitueert. 1 charter. bron: archief huis Terschuur, voorl.inv.nr. 41 (?) (collectie Wartena) 1702 Publicatie van het stadsbestuur van Amersfoort bestemd voor inwoners van Gelderland, die op 2 februari 1702 hun granen op de markt in de stad hebben aangeboden en die de impost van de ronde maat hebben betaald, betreffende de restitutie aan hen van deze belasting door de kopers. -
Government of the Republic of Lithuania
Official translation 5 September 2014 GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA RESOLUTION No 79 22 January 2014 ON THE APPROVAL OF THE LITHUANIAN MIGRATION POLICY GUIDELINES Vilnius Acting pursuant to Paragraph 346 of the Priority Measures for Implementation of the Government Programme for 2012-2016, approved by Resolution No 228 of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania of 13 March 2013 on Approval of Priority Measures for Implementation of the Government Programme for 2012-2016, and with a view to establishing the objectives, principles and areas of the Lithuanian migration policy, as well as to ensuring proper management of migration processes, the Government of the Republic of Lithuanian has resolved: 1. To approve the Lithuanian Migration Policy Guidelines (as appended). 2. To establish that the provisions of the Lithuanian Immigration Policy Guidelines (hereinafter referred to as the Guidelines) approved by the present Resolution shall be followed by ministries, Government institutions, institutions under the ministries, other national authorities and institutions accountable to the Government of the Republic of Lithuania, as they make decisions falling within their respective competencies, draft legislation, consider proposals regarding the adoption of European Union legal acts, as well as draw up negotiation lines of the Republic of Lithuania on these proposals. 3. To recommend to municipalities and other national institutions and agencies, which are outside of the subordination of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania, that they follow the provisions of the Guidelines. 4. To repeal: 4.1. Resolution No 957 of 24 September 2008 of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania on Approval of the Description of Monitoring, Analysis and Forecasting Procedures for Economic Migration Processes and the State of Lithuanians Living Abroad, with all its amendments; 4.2. -
MIRT-ONDERZOEK AANSLUITING A1/A30 BARNEVELD Gemeentea1/A30 Barneveldbarneveld Gemeente Barneveld
MIRT-ONDERZOEK AANSLUITING MIRT-ONDERZOEK AANSLUITING A1/A30 BARNEVELD GemeenteA1/A30 BarneveldBARNEVELD Gemeente Barneveld 13 JULI 2018 13 JULI 2018 MIRT-ONDERZOEK AANSLUITING A1/A30 BARNEVELD Contactpersonen HENDRIK JAN BERGVELD Projectleider MIRT-Onderzoek Aansluiting A1/A30 Barneveld T +31 (0)88 4261206 Arcadis Nederland B.V. M +31 (0)6 27060591 Postbus 220 E [email protected] 3800 AE Amersfoort Nederland Onze referentie: 079912108 A - Datum: 13 juli 2018 2 van 79 MIRT-ONDERZOEK AANSLUITING A1/A30 BARNEVELD Colofon Stuurgroep MIRT-Onderzoek A1/A30 Aansluiting Barneveld • Mevrouw C. Bieze, Provincie Gelderland, Gedeputeerde (portefeuille Mobiliteit) • De heer P.J.T. van Daalen, Gemeente Barneveld, Wethouder (portefeuille Verkeer) • De heer G.J. van den Hengel, Gemeente Barneveld, Wethouder (portefeuille Economie, tot 17 mei 2018) Projectgroep MIRT-Onderzoek A1/A30 Aansluiting Barneveld • De heer P. Hekman, Gemeente Barneveld • Mevrouw L. Hick, Provincie Gelderland • De heer B. van Oort, Rijkswaterstaat Oost-Nederland • De heer R. Vermijs, Rijkswaterstaat Oost-Nederland • De heer H. Roem, Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat (tot 1 maart 2018) • Mevrouw G. Moerman, Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat (vanaf 1 maart 2018) Auteurs rapportage MIRT-Onderzoek A1/A30 Aansluiting Barneveld • De heer H.J. Bergveld, Arcadis Nederland BV • De heer N. de Groot, Arcadis Nederland BV • Mevrouw N. Schaap, Arcadis Nederland BV • De heer R. Vreeker, Arcadis Nederland BV Versiebeheer Versie Datum Samenvatting van de wijzigingen -
Scherpenzeel
333 HERINDELINGSONTWERP GEMEENTE BARNEVELD-SCHERPENZEEL 1 Colofon Vastgesteld door Gedeputeerde Staten van Gelderland 26 januari 2021 Provincie Gelderland Postbus 9090 6800 GX Arnhem 026 359 99 99 [email protected] https://kijkopscherpenzeel.nl 2 INHOUDSOPGAVE HERINDELINGSONTWERP 1. Aanleiding en inhoud herindelingsontwerp .................................................................................... 5 2. Situatieschets Scherpenzeel en Barneveld ...................................................................................... 7 2.1 Kenmerken gemeente Scherpenzeel....................................................................................... 7 2.2 Kenmerken gemeente Barneveld .......................................................................................... 10 2.3 Samenwerking Regio Foodvalley ........................................................................................... 13 3. De bestuurskrachtopgave van Scherpenzeel ................................................................................ 14 3.1 Toekomstvisie 2030 en onderzoek naar realisatiekracht Scherpenzeel (2018-2019) .......... 14 3.2 Aanpak bestuurskrachtopgave door Scherpenzeel (2019-2020) .......................................... 15 3.3 Rol GS bij bestuurskrachtproblematiek Scherpenzeel (2011 – 2020) ................................... 16 3.4 Standpuntbepaling GS naar aanleiding van Kadernota (juni/juli 2020). ............................... 17 3.5 Verkenning mogelijkheden versterking bestuurskracht Scherpenzeel (april/mei 2020) -
The Complex Dynamics Between German Citizens and Turkish Immigrants
The Complex Dynamics between German Citizens and Turkish Immigrants Jesse Jones, West Texas A&M University abstract: This article examines the latest immigration trends into Western Europe, particularly the immigration of Turks to Ger- many. The origins of Turkish immigration and German immigration law are reviewed. Turkey’s bid for European Union membership is examined historically and opinions about how this potential European Union member has caused controversy and how Turkey could change the face of the European Union will be discussed. Attitudes of German citizens toward immigrants are examined using data from the European Values Survey (EVS). Tests show that religion and possibly education level play a role in determining the attitude of German citizens toward immigrants, the majority of whom are Turkish. Introduction1 Turkey in particular, but will also examine attitudes to- ward Turkey’s proposed ascension as a member state of Immigration has always raised concerns for sovereign the European Union itself. If accepted, Turkey would dra- states. Among these concerns: immigrants may refuse matically alter the demography of the European Union to assimilate, they may decrease the standard of living, and redefine what it means to be European. crime rates might increase, or they may take jobs away from non-immigrant citizens. One famous focal point of these concerns is along the southern border of the History of Turkish Immigration, German United States and Mexico, but in other areas of the world Immigration Laws, and Reform immigration is just as controversial an issue as it is on the North American Continent. As the twentieth century progressed, incentives for in- Western Europe has been experiencing an immigra- creased immigration to Europe began to be felt in the tion surge, primarily individuals from underdeveloped Middle East and in Turkey. -
Europe Re-Opening by Country
Europe Re-Opening by Country Overview As European countries re-open, Schengen Area countries have mostly excluded U.S. travelers from entry, with some exceptions (see previous OSAC reporting). While each European country periodically reviews the list of “safe countries,” there is no indication if/when U.S. travelers will be able to conduct normal travel to these locations. The EU reported that its criteria relate to the epidemiological situation and containment measures, including physical distancing, as well as economic and social considerations in each country, applied cumulatively. Countries should meet the following criteria in particular: • Close to or below the EU 14-day average, as it stands on June 14, of the rate of new COVID-19 cases; • The trend of new cases over the same period in comparison to the previous 14 days is stable or decreasing; and • The overall response to COVID-19, taking into account available information on aspects such as testing, surveillance, contact tracing, containment, treatment, and reporting, as well as the reliability of available information and data sources; and if needed, the total average International Health Regulations (IHR) score across all dimensions. Those travelers who do not fit into an exemption category – most potential travelers from the United States are subject to restrictions – must wait for the EU to issue a new list, based on the criteria above, to enter one of the 27 EU member states. Private-sector security managers should remember that this restriction does not affect travel to the United Kingdom. Europe Re-Openings Each U.S. Embassy continues to update its COVID-19 information page for the latest entry/exit, testing, and quarantine requirements, where applicable. -
The Future of Migration and Integration Policy in Germany
The Future of Migration and Integration Policy in Germany Prof. Dr. Rita Süssmuth Former President of the German Bundestag The Migration Policy Institute is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit think tank dedicated to the study of the movement of people worldwide. About the Transatlantic Council on Migration This paper was commissioned by the Transatlantic Council on Migration for its meeting held in May 2009 in Bellagio, Italy. The meeting’s theme was “Public Opinion, Media Coverage, and Migration” and this paper was one of several that informed the Council’s discussions. The Council is an initiative of the Migration Policy Institute undertaken in cooperation with its policy partner, the Bertelsmann Stiftung. The Council is a unique deliberative body that examines vital policy issues and informs migration policymaking processes in North America and Europe. For more on the Transatlantic Council on Migration, please visit: www.migrationpolicy.org/transatlantic © 2009 Migration Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Migration Policy Institute. A full-text PDF of this document is available for free download from www.migrationpolicy.org. Permission for reproducing excerpts from this report should be directed to: Permissions Department, Migration Policy Institute, 1400 16th Street NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20036, or by contacting [email protected] Suggested citation: Süssmuth, Rita. 2009. The Future of Migration and Integration Policy in Germany. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute. I. Executive Summary Since 2000, the German government has undertaken a series of steps to reform laws and shape public opinion in order to bring about better integration and managed migration. -
Incomplete Hegemonies, Hybrid Neighbours: Identity Games and Policy Tools in Eastern Partnership Countries Andrey Makarychev
Incomplete Hegemonies, Hybrid Neighbours: Identity games and policy tools in Eastern Partnership countries Andrey Makarychev No 2018/02, February 2018 Abstract This paper applies the concepts of hegemony and hybridity as analytical tools to help understand the structural changes taking place within the Eastern Partnership (EaP) countries and beyond. The author points to the split identities of many post-Soviet societies and the growing appeal of solutions aimed at balancing Russia’s or the EU’s dominance as important factors shaping EaP dynamics. Against this background, he explores how the post-Soviet borderlands can find their place in a still hypothetical pan-European space, and free themselves from the tensions of their competing hegemons. The EaP is divided into those countries that signed Association Agreements with the EU and those preferring to maintain their loyalty to Eurasian integration. Bringing the two groups closer together, however, is not beyond policy imagination. The policy-oriented part of this analysis focuses on a set of ideas and schemes aimed at enhancing interaction and blurring divisions between these countries. The author proposes five scenarios that might shape the future of EaP countries’ relations with the EU and with Russia: 1) the conflictual status quo in which both hegemonic powers will seek to weaken the position of the other; 2) trilateralism (EU, Russia plus an EaP country), which has been tried and failed, but still is considered as a possible option by some policy analysts; 3) the Kazakhstan-Armenia model of diplomatic advancement towards the EU, with some potential leverage on Russia; 4) deeper engagement by the EU with the Eurasian Economic Union, which has some competences for tariffs and technical standards; and 5) the decoupling of security policies from economic projects, which is so far the most difficult option to foresee and implement in practice. -
The Anguish of Repatriation. Immigration to Poland And
EEPXXX10.1177/0888325414532494East European Politics and SocietiesGrzymała-Kazłowska and Grzymała-Moszczyńska 532494research-article2014 East European Politics and Societies and Cultures Volume XX Number X Month 201X 1 –21 © 2014 SAGE Publications The Anguish of Repatriation: 10.1177/0888325414532494 http://eeps.sagepub.com hosted at Immigration to Poland and Integration http://online.sagepub.com of Polish Descendants from Kazakhstan Aleksandra Grzymała-Kazłowska University of Warsaw Halina Grzymała-Moszczyńska Jagiellonian University Repatriation remains an unsolved problem of Polish migration policy. To date, it has taken place on a small scale, mostly outside of the state’s repatriation system. Thousands of people with a promised repatriation visa are still waiting to be repatri- ated. The majority of the repatriates come from Kazakhstan, home to the largest popu- lation of descendants of Poles in the Asian part of the former USSR. They come to Poland not only for sentimental reasons, but also in search of better living conditions. However, repatriates—in particular older ones—experience a number of problems with adaptation in Poland, dominated by financial and housing-related issues. A further source of difficulties for repatriates, alongside their spatial dispersion, insufficient lin- guistic and cultural competencies, and identity problems, is finding a place on and adapting to the Polish labor market. Despite their difficult situation and special needs, the repatriates in Poland are not sufficiently supported due to the inefficiency of admin- istration and non-governmental institutions dealing with the task of repatriates’ integration. It results in the anguish of repatriation. Keywords: repatriation; repatriates from Kazakhstan; Polish integration policy; immigration to Poland; Polish minority in the former USSR Introduction Over two decades after the beginning of the transformation of the political and economic system in Poland, repatriation remains an unresolved issue. -
Labour Migration Governance in Contemporary Europe. the Case of Sweden
LAB-MIG-GOV Project “Which labour migration governance for a more dynamic and inclusive Europe?” Labour migration governance in contemporary Europe. The case of Sweden Monica Quirico FIERI, Torino, Italy April 2012 The research on which this paper is based benefits from the support of the “Europe and Global Challenges” Programme promoted by Compagnia di San Paolo, Riksbankens Jubileumsfond and VolkswagenStiftung. ii Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 1. FROM EMIGRATION TO IMMIGRATION COUNTRY............................................ 3 1.1 Immigration policies and their impact on labour market .................................... 3 1.2 Integration policies ........................................................................................... 6 2. TOWARDS A NEW LABOUR MIGRATION POLICY ........................................... 11 2.1 The debate on EU and Swedish Model........................................................... 11 2.2 The Committee on Labour Migration (KAKI) 2004-2006 ................................. 12 2.3 The 2008 law on labour migration................................................................... 14 2.3.1 Content..................................................................................................... 14 2.3.2 Driving actors and factors......................................................................... 17 2.4 Reference to EU and other countries.............................................................