Pietro Aretino

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pietro Aretino IN TRO DUC TION RETINE . The name is infamous . Why Was the man really the monster he is universally represented to have been from his time to our own His legend, as the French s a a f . y, would seem to firm it There we read a of one who was born in a hospit l , the son of a n d a courtesan, boasted of it ; who was without name , without family, without friends e and protectors , without ducation ; who at thirteen y ears of age robbed his mother and fled to Perugia ; who at eighteen fled from Perugia to Rome, where he robbed his a a m ster, Agostino Chigi, and presently ppeared ’ as the creature of Cardinal de Medici , whom h e a n supported with infinite wealth of libel, calumny an d the most vile and shameless a buse of his rivals for the Papacy, after the death of Leo X who was kicked out of Rome ’ for writing the notorious Sonetti Lussumosi ’ for Raimondi s infamous engravings ; who a e a s Va a a a w nd red a g bond over Italy, bl ck mailer and a beggar ; who became a friar in A 2 x x PIETRO ARETINO Ra e a v nn , but whom even the Capuchins were obliged to vomit ; who fled to Venice a n d in the freedom of that great Republic lived like a prince on begging a nd threatening letters ; who kept a harem and worse in his a a a pal ce on the Grand Can l, for no vice was stranger to him and no calumny too out rageous ; who hung a picture of the Virgin in his house and s aid it was a portrait of his mother a n d thus declared hims elf to b e ’ Antichrist ; who was the spy of Italy s worst V an d a enemies , Charles Fr ncis I, and who died as a dog dies without a thought of repenta nce in the midst of a howl of blasphemy and laughter ; over whose grave was written ’ ui a e Ar etin oe a o s o Q gi c l p t t c , ’ Che s se mal o fuo r che Dio di d gnun, di , S s a os col non lo o os o . cu nd i dir, c n c Was Aretino really the monster this legend a he portr ys , or is now to be whitewashed t he n ew with discovery of documents , on b etter evidence than our forefathers possessed to be at any rate excused with Alexander VI an d Lucrezia Borgia or acquitted altogether with Ma chiavelli No . Modern scholarship should propose itself no such task in regard to Aretino . The INTRODUCTION xi ma n a a was a monster : monster cert inly, e only not a magician . To listen to som of his biogra phers one might think he owe d his success to sorcery or magic . But the truth is that nothing was further from him than a a m ench ntment . He was onster, it is true to deny that is to b elittle him ; but above all was a ma n da a he of his y, perh ps the most free a n d complete expression of the a ge in — e . a which he liv d the sixteenth century Th t , a n d a th e his enormous bility, together with fact that he founded the modern Press an d used the hitherto unsuspected weapon of publicity with an incomparable a ppreciation ar e c of its power, his hief claims upon our M notice . Something evil an d corrupt ha d entere d the all at e into civilisation of Europe this tim , and a A e not le st of Italy . The Middle g which ha d a a a held out to hum nity so gre t promise, ha d in some inexplicable wa y an d for some i e a e a a e a a c e n xplic bl re son f il d, f iled in endur n an d in life . The fifteenth c entury ha d been full of disaster almost everywhere s ave only an d a in Venice , even Venice could not esc pe the spiritual disa ster which that century ma de a a pp rent . For with the sixteenth c entury w e are face to face with the spiritual break -u p of ii PIETRO ARETINO Europe and European society . Something a an d a . evil, depraved, ven l mean appe rs The en an d a p is bought and sold, futile praise bl me ar e a an d a purch sed by popes , kings prel tes , a and we see a monster appear, monster of genius blackmailing and blackmailing success fully every authority, every power . That at monster was Aretino, and he was home in Venice and in Venice passed no inconsiderable c portion of his days . For the Veni e of the sixteenth century was a promised land for a a n such as he . A city of wealthy merch nts , aristocratic oligarchy fast degenerating into a s as plutocracy, in which snobs abounded well a a schol rs , Venice was then the gre test inde in an d pendent metropolis Europe, insolent, a rtistic , the great asylum for exiles , for the a er proscribed, the ch nce poor scholar, the p f verted and the corrupt . For she could of er to all of them alike this great gift : liberty . And it is in the letters of the very typ e an d paragon of all these together that w e find perha ps the b est picture of the city at this - in e e time the letters of Ar tino who, vil as he w as et a man e , was y of g nius ; scoundrel h e wa s as et a though , w y full of hum nity ; a was wa s an d brut l though he , yet full of pity a e a love for the miser bl , the unfortun te , the INTRODUCTION t wa s a poor ; ignoble hough he , was yet ble to dominate the Italy of his time ; whom Fra ncis I a honoured, Charles V spoke with famili rity, l d e e a n d Ariosto surna med é i vi n o . Her in V nice was he the friend of Titian , the correspondent e of Michelangelo . Here in V nice he lived e e lik a princ , though he had nothing solid under his feet ; he was as insolent as a con d ottier e , though he had rendered no service ; a ma n he was the most f mous in the city, s though his record wa merely infamous . An had a epoch ppeared which was an anarchy , e in which everything was questioned, ev rything doubtful ; in which anything might happen a n d a nything might be thought to be true ; an epoch w without principles and without authority : in which a charlatan of genius might do anything, might destroy the unity of Europe or th e spiritual and philosophical a b sis upon which Europe stood, by one e a — multipl we pon calumny . This age— the age of Luther an d the revolt of the barbaria n— is in itself a dmirably summed a n d . He r e up expressed by Aretino , too , “ fused authority and tradition and a pp ealed a only to priv te judgment . As a writer this a a is his v lue , in this resides his origin lity . ” am a I free man, he boasts . I do not ne ed xiv PIETRO ARETINO to copy Petrarca or Bocca ccio . My own genius e a is enough . Let others worry themselv s bout an style d so cease to b e themselves . Without a a e a e a m ster, without mod l, without guid , without artifice I go to work a n d earn my - a a . a living, my well being n d my f me Wh t do I need more ? With a goose -quill an d a few sheets of paper I mock myself of the ” universe . It is because Aretino is a man of genius , and because he sums up and expresses that a a e a e e a dis strous g of narchy , its compl t mor l an d a disorder coll pse, its delight in insulting a n d a disreg rding the past, its repudiation of a an d a every ancient uthority tradition, th t he a d is worth studying . And if we d to this that he contrived a weapon for his own ends which has in our own day come to be more powerful tha n an y establishe d government or elected a e a — p rliament or her dit ry monarchy publicity, the Press— there is more than sufficient excuse for this book . ’ Ar etino s virtues as a writer ar e to be dis a cussed there ; but we ought to note that, gre t a s r ar e ar e a a these vi tues , they lways those of a a m an e . journ list, never those of of l tters His a — a t gre t strength is his spontaneity, the bili y to write what is in his head almost without a INTRODUCTION xv e second thought .
Recommended publications
  • Vincenzo Cappello C
    National Gallery of Art NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART ONLINE EDITIONS Italian Paintings of the Sixteenth Century Titian and Workshop Titian Venetian, 1488/1490 - 1576 Italian 16th Century Vincenzo Cappello c. 1550/1560 oil on canvas overall: 141 x 118.1 cm (55 1/2 x 46 1/2 in.) framed: 169.2 x 135.3 x 10.2 cm (66 5/8 x 53 1/4 x 4 in.) Samuel H. Kress Collection 1957.14.3 ENTRY This portrait is known in at least four other contemporary versions or copies: in the Chrysler Museum, Norfolk, Virginia[fig. 1]; [1] in the State Hermitage Museum, Saint Petersburg [fig. 2]; [2] in the Seminario Vescovile, Padua; [3] and in the Koelikker collection, Milan. [4] According to John Shearman, x-radiographs have revealed that yet another version was originally painted under the Titian workshop picture Titian and His Friends at Hampton Court (illustrated under Andrea de’ Franceschi). [5] Of these versions, the Gallery’s picture is now generally accepted as the earliest and the finest, and before it entered the Kress collection in 1954, the identity of the sitter, established by Victor Lasareff in 1923 with reference to the Hermitage version, has never subsequently been doubted. [6] Lasareff retained a traditional attribution to Tintoretto, and Rodolfo Pallucchini and W. R. Rearick upheld a similarly traditional attribution to Tintoretto of the present version. [7] But as argued by Wilhelm Suida in 1933 with reference to the Chrysler version (then in Munich), and by Fern Rusk Shapley and Harold Wethey with reference to the present version, an attribution to Titian is more likely.
    [Show full text]
  • Lipa 1 the Reaction to the Last Judgment Joseph Lipa History Of
    Lipa 1 The Reaction to the Last Judgment Joseph Lipa History of Art 351 Professor Willette April 29, 2013 Lipa 2 From the moment of its unveiling on All Hallow’s Eve in 1541 to its near demolition in the decades to follow, Michelangelo’s famed Last Judgment evoked a reaction only surpassed in variety by the human figure it depicted. Commissioned six years before by Pope Paul III, this colossal fresco of the resurrection of the body at the end of the world spanned the altar wall of the same Sistine Chapel whose ceiling Michelangelo had painted some twenty years earlier. Whether stunned by its intricacy, sobered by its content, or even scandalized by its apparent indecency, sixteenth-century minds could not stop discussing what was undoubtedly both the most famous and the most controversial work of its day. “This work is the true splendor of all Italy and of artists, who come from the Hyperborean ends of the earth to see and draw it,” exclaimed Italian Painter Gian Paolo Lomazzo, nonetheless one of the fresco’s fiercest critics.”1 To be sure, neither Lomazzo nor any of Michelangelo’s contemporaries doubted his artistic skill. On the contrary, it was precisely Michelangelo’s unparalleled ability to depict the nude human body that caused the work to be as severely criticized by some as it was highly praised by others. While critics and acclaimers alike often varied in their motives, the polarizing response to the Last Judgment can only be adequately understood in light of the unique religious circumstances of its time.
    [Show full text]
  • Leonardo Da Vinci and the Persistence of Myth Emily Hanson
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) 1-1-2012 Inventing the Sculptor: Leonardo da Vinci and the Persistence of Myth Emily Hanson Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd Recommended Citation Hanson, Emily, "Inventing the Sculptor: Leonardo da Vinci and the Persistence of Myth" (2012). All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs). 765. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd/765 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Department of Art History & Archaeology INVENTING THE SCULPTOR LEONARDO DA VINCI AND THE PERSISTENCE OF MYTH by Emily Jean Hanson A thesis presented to the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts May 2012 Saint Louis, Missouri ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wouldn’t be here without the help and encouragement of all the following people. Many thanks to all my friends: art historians, artists, and otherwise, near and far, who have sustained me over countless meals, phone calls, and cappuccini. My sincere gratitude extends to Dr. Wallace for his wise words of guidance, careful attention to my work, and impressive example. I would like to thank Campobello for being a wonderful mentor and friend, and for letting me persuade her to drive the nearly ten hours to Syracuse for my first conference, which convinced me that this is the best job in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Giorgio Vasari and Mannerist Architecture: a Marriage of Beauty and Function in Urban Spaces
    Journal of Literature and Art Studies, October 2016, Vol. 6, No. 10, 1159-1180 doi: 10.17265/2159-5836/2016.10.007 D DAVID PUBLISHING Giorgio Vasari and Mannerist Architecture: A Marriage of Beauty and Function in Urban Spaces Liana De Girolami Cheney SIELAE, Universidad de Coruña, Coruña, Spain The first part of this essay deals with Giorgio Vasari’s conception of architecture in sixteenth-century Italy, and the second part examines Vasari’s practical application of one of his constructions, the loggia (open gallery or arcade) or corridoio (corridor). The essay also discusses the merits of Vasari’s open gallery (loggia) as a vernacular architectural construct with egalitarian functions and Vasari’s principles of architecture (design, rule, order, and proportion) and beauty (delight and necessity) for the formulation of the theory of art in Mannerism, a sixteenth-century style of art. Keywords: mannerism, fine arts, loggia (open gallery), architectural principles, theory of art, design, beauty, necessity and functionality Chi non ha disegno e grande invenzione da sé, sarà sempre povero di grazia, di perfezione e di giudizio ne’ componimenti grandi d’architettura. [One that lacks design and great invention [in his art] will always have meager architectural constructions lacking beauty, perfection, and judgment.] —Giorgio Vasari Vite (1550/1568)1 Introduction The renowned Mannerist painter, architect, and writer of Florence, Giorgio Vasari (1511-1574, see Figure 1), considered architecture one of the most important aspects of the fine arts or the sister arts (architecture, painting, and sculpture).2 In the first Florentine publication of the Vite with La Torrentina in 1550, Vasari’s original title lists architecture before the other arts: Le vite de più eccellenti architetti, pittori, et scultori Italiani da Cimabue insino a’ tempi nostri.
    [Show full text]
  • Sebastiano Del Piombo and His Collaboration with Michelangelo: Distance and Proximity to the Divine in Catholic Reformation Rome
    SEBASTIANO DEL PIOMBO AND HIS COLLABORATION WITH MICHELANGELO: DISTANCE AND PROXIMITY TO THE DIVINE IN CATHOLIC REFORMATION ROME by Marsha Libina A dissertation submitted to the Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland April, 2015 © 2015 Marsha Libina All Rights Reserved Abstract This dissertation is structured around seven paintings that mark decisive moments in Sebastiano del Piombo’s Roman career (1511-47) and his collaboration with Michelangelo. Scholarship on Sebastiano’s collaborative works with Michelangelo typically concentrates on the artists’ division of labor and explains the works as a reconciliation of Venetian colorito (coloring) and Tuscan disegno (design). Consequently, discourses of interregional rivalry, center and periphery, and the normativity of the Roman High Renaissance become the overriding terms in which Sebastiano’s work is discussed. What has been overlooked is Sebastiano’s own visual intelligence, his active rather than passive use of Michelangelo’s skills, and the novelty of his works, made in response to reform currents of the early sixteenth century. This study investigates the significance behind Sebastiano’s repeating, slowing down, and narrowing in on the figure of Christ in his Roman works. The dissertation begins by addressing Sebastiano’s use of Michelangelo’s drawings as catalysts for his own inventions, demonstrating his investment in collaboration and strategies of citation as tools for artistic image-making. Focusing on Sebastiano’s reinvention of his partner’s drawings, it then looks at the ways in which the artist engaged with the central debates of the Catholic Reformation – debates on the Church’s mediation of the divine, the role of the individual in the path to personal salvation, and the increasingly problematic distance between the layperson and God.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiling Women in Sixteenth-Century Italian
    BEAUTY, POWER, PROPAGANDA, AND CELEBRATION: PROFILING WOMEN IN SIXTEENTH-CENTURY ITALIAN COMMEMORATIVE MEDALS by CHRISTINE CHIORIAN WOLKEN Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Edward Olszewski Department of Art History CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERISTY August, 2012 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis/dissertation of Christine Chiorian Wolken _______________________________________________________ Doctor of Philosophy Candidate for the __________________________________________ degree*. Edward J. Olszewski (signed) _________________________________________________________ (Chair of the Committee) Catherine Scallen __________________________________________________________________ Jon Seydl __________________________________________________________________ Holly Witchey __________________________________________________________________ April 2, 2012 (date)_______________________ *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. 1 To my children, Sofia, Juliet, and Edward 2 Table of Contents List of Images ……………………………………………………………………..….4 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………...…..12 Abstract……………………………………………………………………………...15 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………16 Chapter 1: Situating Sixteenth-Century Medals of Women: the history, production techniques and stylistic developments in the medal………...44 Chapter 2: Expressing the Link between Beauty and
    [Show full text]
  • Renaissance Woman: the Life of Vittoria Colonna. Ramie Targoff. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2018
    REVIEWS 665 Renaissance Woman: The Life of Vittoria Colonna. Ramie Targoff. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2018. 342 pp. $30. Vittoria Colonna was the most renowned Italian female writer of her day, and she was the first woman in Italy to see a collection of her poetry in print. She led a peripatetic life, leaving her birthplace in the Alban Hills for Naples when her father became grand constable of the Spanish-dominated kingdom, and thence to the island of Ischia. On Ischia in 1509, she was married to Francesco Ferrante D’Avalos, Marquis of Pescara, to whom, despite his long absences, she was devoted. There, too, at thirty-five, she received news from Milan of his death. Colonna traveled to Rome, seeking a vocation as a nun and the peaceful isolation of convent life. After sojourns in Ferrara, Orvieto, and Viterbo, she returned to Rome where, in 1547, she died. Hers was a household name among Europe’s political circles—she had ties to Charles V, Clement VII, Paul III, and Marguerite of Navarre—and she sustained famous friendships with ambitious, mercurial figures, including Michelangelo and Reginald Pole. Colonna maintained fruitful intellectual affiliations with Baldassare Castiglione, Paolo Giovio, and Pietro Bembo. Her commitment to her faith was cons- tant and conspicuous. Her widely circulated writings, which seem to have increased after Ferrante’s death, offer an astonishing picture of the work of grief and of her resis- tance to the possibility of reconciling religious passion with earthly love. We know from her poetry not only that she contemplated suicide after her husband’s death, but also that writing became the means by which she came to a détente with loss, moving for- ward to embrace a personal and prescient activism on behalf of the project of Catholic reform.
    [Show full text]
  • Pietro Aretino, the Scourge of Princes
    Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from University of Toronto http://www.archive.org/details/pietroaretinoscoOOhutt Yt/ V " PIETRO ARETINO PIETRO ARETINO The Scourge of Princes By EDWARD HUTTON WiM a Portrait afttr Titian CONSTABLE & CO LTD LONDON : BOMBAY : SYDNEY 1922 Printed in Great Britain at Tkt MayAotuir Press, Plymouth. William Brendon & Son, Ltd. TO MY FRIEND NORMAN DOUGLAS NOTE My various debts to previous writers on the subject of this work are duly acknowledged in the notes throughout the book, but I wish here especially to mention Comm. Alessandro Luzio, of Mantua, to whom every writer upon Pietro Aretino owes so much, my friend Professor Cesare Foligno, of Oxford, who has generously given time and thought to reading the proofs, and my friend Comm. Biagi, of Florence, who obtained for me more than one rare opuscolo. INTRODUCTION ARETINE. The name is infamous. Why ? -^ ^ Was the man really the monster he is universally represented to have been from his time to our own ? His legend, as the French say, would seem to affirm it. There we read of one who was born in a hospital, the son of a courtesan, and boasted of it ; who was without name, without family, without friends and protectors, without education ; who at thirteen years of age robbed his mother and fled to Perugia ; who at eighteen fled from Perugia to Rome, where he robbed his master, Agostino Chigi, and presently appeared as the creature of Cardinal de' Medici, whom he supported with an infinite wealth of libel, calumny and the most vile and shameless
    [Show full text]
  • An Ayyubid in Mamluk Guise: the Portrait of Saladin in Paolo Giovio's
    An Ayyubid in Mamluk Guise: The Portrait of Saladin in Paolo Giovio’s Elogia virorum bellica virtute illustrium (1575) MMarcu MMarcus M An Ayyubid in Mamluk Guise Marcus Milwright University of Victoria An Ayyubid in Mamluk Guise: The Portrait of Saladin in Paolo Giovio’s Elogia virorum bellica virtute illustrium (1575) Biographical encyclopedias were an important source of information for those sixteenth-century Europeans wishing to inform themselves about the recent events and principal political figures of the Islamic world. Published by Guil- laume Rouillé in Lyon in 1551, the Promptuarium iconum (“Storeroom of Images”) is notable as the first of this genre of printed books to include a full set of por- traits of the Ottoman sultans (Osman I to Süleyman I), each accompanied by a short biographical note. A shrewd businessman, Rouillé probably included these portraits and an image of Tīmūr Lenk (Tamerlane, r. 1370–1405), the victor over sultan Bāyezīd I Yıldırım (r. 1389–1402, d. 1403) at the battle of Ankara in 1402, to cater to the public thirst for information concerning the expanding empire of the Turks. 1 More significant than thePromptuarium, however, is the contribu- tion made by the Italian scholar and bishop of Nocera, Paolo Giovio (d. 1552). The author of influential studies of Ottoman and Islamic history, he was also well known in his own time for his portrait collection, located in his houses in Rome and on the banks of Lake Como. 2 Although the majority of the illustrious figures depicted in this extensive group of oil paintings came from antiquity and from late medieval and Renaissance Europe, Giovio also commissioned paintings of all the Ottoman sultans and notable Turkish figures like the admiral, Barbarossa.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction 1. Knolles (1603), sig. A4 v. 2. George Sandys, A Relation of a Journey begun Anno Dominus 1610 (London: for W. Barret, 1615), 46. 3. Andrea Cambini and Paolo Giovio, Two Very Notable Commentaries, trans. John Shute (London: Rouland Hall for Humfrey Toye, 1562), in EEBO, sig. *1 r. 4. Samuel Johnston, The Rambler, II (London, 1767), 95:122, Saturday, May 18, 1751; Robert Southey, The Life and Correspondence of Robert Southey, Charles Cuthbert Southey, ed., II (London: Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans, 1850), 271, Southey to Coleridge, ‘Greta Hall, March 12. 1804’; As for Byron, it was recorded by Count Pietro Gamba that on the 31 of January Alexander Mavrocordato visited Byron shortly after his arrival at Missolonghi (it had been Mavrocordato who persuaded him to travel to Greece in support of the revolution). While they conversed on Turkish history and the geneal- ogy of Ottoman Emperors Byron recalled ‘The Turkish history [i.e. Knolles] was one of the first books that gave me pleasure when a child: and I believe it had much influence on my subsequent wishes to visit the Levant, and gave, perhaps, the oriental colouring which is observed in my poetry‘, see Pietro Gamba, A Narrative of Lord Byron’s Last Journey to Greece Extracted from the Journal of Count Peter Gamba who Attended his Lordship on that Expedition (Paris: A. and W. Galignani, 1825), 144. Further, Byron wrote in the margin of a copy of Issac D’Israeli’s Literary Character: ‘Knolles, Cantemir, De Tott, Lady M.W. Montagu, Hawkins’s translation from Mignot’s History of the Turks, the Arabian Nights, all travels or histories or books upon the east I could meet with, I had read, as well as Rycaut, before I was ten years old’...
    [Show full text]
  • Michaelis Angeli Vita FONTES 12
    PAOLO GIOVIO : Michaelis Angeli vita [um 1527] mit drei Übersetzungen herausgegeben und kommentiert von CHARLES DAVIS FONTES 12 [22. September 2008] Zitierfähige URL: http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/artdok/volltexte/2008/579 P A O L O G I O V I O Michaelis Angeli Vita, quam Paulus Iovius, episcopus Nucerinus conscripsit. FONTES 12 (Michelangelo 1) 2 CONTENTS 4 INTRODUCTION 9 OUTLINE AND STRUCTURE OF THE Michaelis Angeli vita 10 THE TEXT ( Latin ) 12 THE TEXT: German version 13 THE TEXT: Italian version 15 THE TEXT: English version 17 INDEXING 19 IDENTIFICATIONS 21 BIOGRAPHY OF PAOLO GIOVIO 25 BIOBIBLIOGRAPHY 26 BIBLIOGRAPHY 29 SOME MODERN EDITIONS OF GIOVIO’S WORKS 30 EXTERNAL LINKS 3 INTRODUCTION Giovio’s very brief Michaelis Angeli vita was presumably written in Rome during the Pontificate of Clement VII (1523-1534) and after 1524, owing to its mention of Janus Coricius’s Coryciana (1524) and its further mention of the presence of Bandinelli’s Laocoön in the courtyard of the Palazzo Medici in Florence (1524). The text is usually dated around 1527, although some have argued for earlier and later dates. A date later than the Pontificate of Clement appears most unlikely. For a recent discussion of the question of dating, see Shearman, Raphael in Early Modern Sources , 2003 ( infra ), vol. 1, pp. 809-810. It is not entirely certain that Giovio used the word ‘ vita ’ in his title, and this characterization may have been supplied later. Nevertheless, ‘ vita ’ and ‘ elogio ’ are two terms that Giovio applied to his biographies, some quite brief and other more lengthy.
    [Show full text]
  • 'An Important Work by Titian Has Been Hiding in Plain Sight'
    AiA news-service ‘An important work by Titian has been hiding in plain sight’ Xavier F. Salomon 20 SEPTEMBER 2019 Portrait of Pietro Aretino (detail) (1527), here attributed to Titian. Kunstmuseum Basel In 1905, the American industrialist and collector Henry Clay Frick acquired a portrait by Titian of Pietro Aretino, the 16th-century writer and libertine. Since the Frick Collection opened in 1935, it has been one of the museum’s masterpieces and has hung in the Living Hall, to the right of Giovanni Bellini’s Saint Francis in the Desert. Aretino moved to Venice in 1527 after a series of adventures. In 1524, when he was living in Rome, he wrote 16 sonetti lussuriosi (lustful sonnets) to accompany the erotic images designed by Giulio Romano and engraved by Marcantonio Raimondi, known as I modi (the ‘ways’ or ‘positions’). As a result of their publication, Romano left Rome, Raimondi earned some jail time and Aretino made a number of enemies within the papal Curia. On the night of 28 July 1525, while riding through the city, he was stabbed twice in the chest and multiple times in the hands. After this unsuccessful assassination attempt, Aretino left Rome in October, in the service of the condottiero Giovanni de’ Medici ‘dalle Bande Nere’, whose death in 1526 prompted him to move to the court of Federico Gonzaga in Mantua. Heartbroken after affairs with Isabella Sforza and with a young boy, Aretino left for Venice, where he was to spend the rest of his life. During the 30 years that Aretino lived in the city, Titian became one of his closest friends.
    [Show full text]