DOCSLIB.ORG

HARLAND CLARKE HOLDINGS CORP Form 10-K Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HARLAND CLARKE HOLDINGS CORP Form 10-K Annual Report SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 10-K Annual report pursuant to section 13 and 15(d) Filing Date: 2013-02-25 | Period of Report: 2012-12-31 SEC Accession No. 0001354752-13-000005 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER HARLAND CLARKE HOLDINGS CORP Mailing Address Business Address 10931 LAUREATE DRIVE 10931 LAUREATE DRIVE CIK:1354752| IRS No.: 841696500 | State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 1231 SAN ANTONIO TX 78249 SAN ANTONIO TX 78249 Type: 10-K | Act: 34 | File No.: 333-133253 | Film No.: 13636964 (210) 697-8888 SIC: 2780 Blankbooks, looseleaf binders & bookbindg & relatd work Copyright © 2014 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K (Mark One) þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 or ¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _________ to _________ Commission File Number 333-133253 HARLAND CLARKE HOLDINGS CORP. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 84-1696500 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) incorporation or organization) 10931 Laureate Drive, San Antonio, TX 78249 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) (210) 697-8888 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes £ No R Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.Yes R No £ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes R No £* Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes R No £ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. R Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer £ Accelerated file £ Non-accelerated filer R Smaller reporting company £ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes £ No R As of February 25, 2013, there were 100 shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding, with a par value of $0.01 per share. All outstanding shares are owned by a subsidiary of M & F Worldwide Corp. Copyright © 2013 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document * The registrant is not required to file this Annual Report on Form 10-K or other reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, but has filed all reports during the preceding 12 months that would have been required pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The filing is required, however, pursuant to the terms of the indenture governing Harland Clarke Holdings Corp.'s senior notes due 2015. Copyright © 2013 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Copyright © 2013 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document HARLAND CLARKE HOLDINGS CORP. INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K Page PART I Item 1. Business 1 Item 1A. Risk Factors 8 Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 21 Item 2. Properties 21 Item 3. Legal Proceedings 24 Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 24 PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 25 Item 6. Selected Financial Data 25 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 27 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks 54 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 54 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 54 Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 54 Item 9B. Other Information 55 PART III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 56 Item 11. Executive Compensation 58 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 73 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 73 Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services 74 PART IV Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 76 i Copyright © 2013 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document (This page intentionally left blank) ii Copyright © 2013 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Table of Contents PART I Item 1. Business Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. ("Harland Clarke Holdings" and, together with its subsidiaries, the "Company") is a holding company that conducts its operations through its direct and indirect, wholly owned operating subsidiaries and was incorporated in Delaware on October 19, 2005. The Company is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of M & F Worldwide Corp. ("M & F Worldwide"), which is, as of December 21, 2011, an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc. ("MacAndrews"). MacAndrews is wholly owned by Ronald O. Perelman. On September 12, 2011, M & F Worldwide agreed to merge with an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of MacAndrews, and following a vote of stockholders of M & F Worldwide and the satisfaction or waiver of closing conditions, that merger was effected on December 21, 2011 (the "MacAndrews Acquisition"). On March 19, 2012, the Company purchased Faneuil, Inc. ("Faneuil") from affiliates of MacAndrews (see Note 3 to the Company's consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). Under accounting guidance for transactions among entities under common control, the Company has accounted for the purchase at historical cost and has retrospectively recasted prior periods under common control to include Faneuil operations. The Company and Faneuil came under common control on December 21, 2011, the date of the MacAndrews Acquisition. Faneuil is a separate business segment for financial reporting purposes. The Company has organized its business and corporate structure along the following four business segments: Harland Clarke, Harland Financial Solutions, Scantron and Faneuil. During the second quarter of 2012, the Company transferred certain product and service lines from the Scantron segment to other segments to better align complementary products and services. The Harland Technology Services ("HTS") and Medical Device Tracking ("MDT") businesses were transferred to the Faneuil segment and the Survey Services business was transferred to the Harland Clarke segment. Prior period segment information has been reclassified to reflect this change. The Harland Clarke segment offers checks and related products, forms and treasury supplies, and related delivery and fraud prevention products to financial and commercial institutions. It also provides direct marketing services to their clients including direct marketing campaigns, direct mail, database marketing, telemarketing and digital marketing. In addition to these products and services, the Harland Clarke segment offers stationery, business cards, survey services and other business and home office products to consumers and businesses. The Harland Financial Solutions segment provides technology products and related services to financial institutions worldwide including lending and mortgage compliance and origination applications, risk management solutions, business intelligence solutions, Internet and mobile banking applications, branch automation solutions, self-service solutions, electronic payment solutions and core processing systems. The Scantron segment provides data management and decision support solutions and related services to educational, commercial and governmental entities worldwide. Scantron products and services provide solutions for testing and assessment, instruction and performance management and business operational data collection. Scantron's solutions combine a variety of data collection, analysis,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IN the COURT of CHANCERY of the STATE of DELAWARE in RE MFW SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION ) ) ) ) Consolidated C.A. No. 6566-CS
    EFiled: Sep 15 2011 6:09PM EDT Transaction ID 39835714 Case No. 6566-CS IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) IN RE MFW SHAREHOLDERS ) Consolidated C.A. No. 6566-CS LITIGATION ) ) VERIFIED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Alan Kahn, Samuel Pill, Irwin Pill, Rachel Pill and Charlotte Martin ³3ODLQWLIIV´ RQEHKDOIRIWKHPVHOYHVDQGDOORWKHUVVLPLODUO\VLWXDWHGE\WKHLUDWWRUQH\VDOOHJH the following upon information and belief, except as to those allegations pertaining to Plaintiffs which are alleged upon personal knowledge: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is a shareholder class action complaint on behalf of the holders of the FRPPRQVWRFNRI0 ):RUOGZLGH&RUS ³0):´RUWKH³&RPSDQ\´ DJDLQVWWKH&RPSDQ\¶V %RDUGRI'LUHFWRUV WKH³%RDUG´RUWKH³,QGLYLGXDO'HIHQGDQWV´ DPRQJRWKHUVLQFonnection to DJRLQJSULYDWHWUDQVDFWLRQ WKH³%X\RXW´ LQZKLFKGHIHQGDQW5RQDOG23HUHOPDQ ³3HUHOPDQ´ will acquire, through his wholly owned holding company MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc. ³0 )´ WKHUHPDLQLQJRIVKDUHVRI0):FRPPRQVWRFNQRt already owned by M&F. 2. On September 12, 2011, MFW issued a press release announcing that it had HQWHUHG LQWR D GHILQLWLYH PHUJHU DJUHHPHQW WKH ³0HUJHU$JUHHPHQW´ ZLWK0 )SXUVXDQW WR which MFW would be merged with a subsidiary of M&F and all outstanding shares of common stock of MFW not owned by M&F would be converted into the right to receive $25 in cash per share for a transaction valued at $482 million. Although M&F touted the $25 per share as offering a 22% one-GD\ SUHPLXP WR WKH &RPSDQ\¶V FORVLQJ share price, the Buyout in fact represents a substantial discount to other recent trading prices of MFW common stock and a VXEVWDQWLDOGLVFRXQWWRWKH&RPSDQ\¶VYDOXDEOHDVVHWV 3. As described below, both the value to MFW public shareholders contemplated in the Buyout and the process by which Defendants propose to consummate the Buyout are not entirely fair to Plaintiffs and the other public shareholders of the Company.
    [Show full text]
  • In Re Mfw Shareholders ) C.A
    IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE MFW SHAREHOLDERS ) C.A. No. 6566-CS LITIGATION ) OPINION Date Submitted: March 11, 2013 Date Decided: May 29, 2013 Peter B. Andrews, Esquire, FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Carmella P. Keener, Esquire, ROSENTHAL, MONHAIT & GODDESS, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Carl L. Stine, Esquire, Matthew Insley-Pruitt, Esquire, WOLF POPPER LLP, New York, New York; Juan E. Monteverde, Esquire, FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP, New York, New York; Kira German, Esquire, GARDY & NOTIS LLP, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Attorneys for Plaintiff MFW Stockholders. Thomas J. Allingham II, Esquire, Joseph O. Larkin, Esquire, Christopher M. Foulds, Esquire, Jessica L. Raatz, Esquire, SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP, Wilmington, Delaware, Attorneys for Defendants MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc., Ronald O. Perelman, Barry F. Schwartz, and William C. Bevins. Stephen P. Lamb, Esquire, Meghan M. Dougherty, Esquire, PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Daniel J. Leffell, PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, New York, New York, Attorneys for Defendants M&F Worldwide Corp., Philip E. Beekman, Charles T. Dawson, Theo W. Folz, John M. Keane, Bruce Slovin, and Stephen G. Taub. William M. Lafferty, Esquire, D. McKinley Measley, Esquire, MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Tariq Mundiya, Esquire, Todd G. Cosenza, Esquire, Christopher J. Miritello, Esquire, Jill K. Grant, Esquire, WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER, LLP, Attorneys for Defendants Paul M. Meister, Martha L. Byorum, Viet D. Dinh, and Carl B. Webb. STRINE, Chancellor. I. Introduction This case presents a novel question of law. Here, MacAndrews & Forbesa holding company whose equity is solely owned by defendant Ronald Perelmanowned 43% of M&F Worldwide (“MFW”).
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT of NEW YORK ------X : in Re : Chapter 11 Case No
    14-12623-shl Doc 694 Filed 12/15/15 Entered 12/15/15 12:32:00 Main Document Pg 1 of 158 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x : In re : Chapter 11 Case No. : SIGA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., : 14-12623 (SHL) : Debtor. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------x DEBTOR’S CHAPTER 11 PLAN WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP Stephen Karotkin 767 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10153 (212) 310-8000 Attorneys for Debtor and Debtor in Possession WEIL:\95564956\3\74193.0003 14-12623-shl Doc 694 Filed 12/15/15 Entered 12/15/15 12:32:00 Main Document Pg 2 of 158 Article I. Definitions and Interpretation ..................................................................................1 1.1 Administrative Expenses .........................................................................................1 1.2 Allowed ....................................................................................................................1 1.3 Amended and Restated By-laws ..............................................................................2 1.4 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation ...............................................2 1.5 Arbitration Agreement .............................................................................................2 1.6 Arbitrator..................................................................................................................2 1.7 Avoidance Action ....................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS II Syllabus & Supplementary Materials
    BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS II Syllabus & Supplementary Materials Fall Semester 2015 Professor Kenneth B. Davis, Jr. 262-0962 [email protected] Room 9107; Office Hours – Tuesday, 4:00-5:00 & Wednesday, 4:00-5:00 Course Materials Allen, Kraakman & Subramanian, Commentaries and Cases on the Law of Business Organization (Aspen Casebook Series – 4th ed. 2012) (“AK&S”) Allen, Kraakman & Subramanian, 2012-2013 Statutory Supplement (“Stat. Supp.”) Davis Supplementary Materials (Attached) (“KBD Supp.”) Assignment # OVERVIEW #1. Sources and Structure of Corporate Law a. State Corporation Law; Domestic versus Foreign Corporations – AK&S pp. 81-94; KBD Supp. pp. 1-3; Central Metals Problem ¶¶ 1,2; Model Business Corporation Act (“MBCA”) § 15.05; California Corporation Code § 2115 b. Charter & Bylaws; Exclusive Forum Provisions – AK&S pp. 94-97; KBD Supp. pp. 3-8; Central Metals Problem ¶ 3; Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) §§ 102, 109, 115; MBCA § 10.20. Also, please look over the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of Twitter, Inc. (KBD Supp. Appendix, following p. 137) #2. Levels of Corporate Decision Making a. Board of Directors – AK&S pp. 102-111; Badger Labs Problem (KBD Supp. pp. 8- 10) ¶¶ 1, 2, 3(a)-(b); DGCL § 141(a)-(c),(f),(g),(i) b. Officers – AK&S pp. 111-114; DGCL § 142; Badger Labs Problem ¶ 3(c) c. Shareholders – KBD Supp. pp. 11-19; DGCL §§ 109; Badger Labs Problem ¶4 SHAREHOLDER VOTING & THE PROXY RULES #3. Issues under State Law a. Shareholder Meetings & Election Contests i. Unfireable CEO Problem – AK&S pp. 158-159; KBD Supp. p. 19; DGCL §§ 109(a), 242(b)(1), 275 ii.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware In
    EFiled: May 29 2013 04:05PM EDT Transaction ID 52519692 Case No. 6566-CS IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE MFW SHAREHOLDERS ) C.A. No. 6566-CS LITIGATION ) OPINION Date Submitted: March 11, 2013 Date Decided: May 29, 2013 Peter B. Andrews, Esquire, FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Carmella P. Keener, Esquire, ROSENTHAL, MONHAIT & GODDESS, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Carl L. Stine, Esquire, Matthew Insley-Pruitt, Esquire, WOLF POPPER LLP, New York, New York; Juan E. Monteverde, Esquire, FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP, New York, New York; Kira German, Esquire, GARDY & NOTIS LLP, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Attorneys for Plaintiff MFW Stockholders. Thomas J. Allingham II, Esquire, Joseph O. Larkin, Esquire, Christopher M. Foulds, Esquire, Jessica L. Raatz, Esquire, SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP, Wilmington, Delaware, Attorneys for Defendants MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc., Ronald O. Perelman, Barry F. Schwartz, and William C. Bevins. Stephen P. Lamb, Esquire, Meghan M. Dougherty, Esquire, PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Daniel J. Leffell, PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, New York, New York, Attorneys for Defendants M&F Worldwide Corp., Philip E. Beekman, Charles T. Dawson, Theo W. Folz, John M. Keane, Bruce Slovin, and Stephen G. Taub. William M. Lafferty, Esquire, D. McKinley Measley, Esquire, MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Tariq Mundiya, Esquire, Todd G. Cosenza, Esquire, Christopher J. Miritello, Esquire, Jill K. Grant, Esquire, WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER, LLP, Attorneys for Defendants Paul M. Meister, Martha L. Byorum, Viet D. Dinh, and Carl B. Webb. STRINE, Chancellor. I. Introduction This case presents a novel question of law.
    [Show full text]