DOCSLIB.ORG

The Journal of the Nsw Bar Association | Spring 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

barTHE JOURNAL newsOF THE NSW BAR ASSOCIATION | SPRING 2017 news THE JOURNAL OF NSW BAR ASSOCIATION | SPRING 2017 bar BN Cover Spring 2017 23Aug17 Final OL.indd 1 23/8/17 8:17 pm THE JOURNAL OF THE NSW BAR ASSOCIATION | SPRING 2017 Contents 2 Editor’s note Bar News Editorial Committee Jeremy Stoljar SC (chair) 3 President’s column Greg Burton SC 8 Recent developments Kristina Stern SC Anthony Cheshire SC 18 News Dominic Villa Bench and Bar Dinner 2017 Daniel Tynan Nicolas Kirby Bar Practice Course 01/2017 Daniel Klineberg Catherine Gleeson 22 Features Victoria Brigden Off with the wig Caroline Dobraszczyk Talitha Fishburn Mediation and advocacy Juliet Curtin Radhika Withana Southern-style justice Kevin Tang Charles Gregory Equitable restitution Uche Okereke-Fisher Beyond Bleak House Chris Winslow (Bar Association) 54 Address The art of advocacy: Sir Garfield Barwick, the radical advocate 61 Practice ISSN 0817-0002 The dvancedA Trial Advocacy Intensive Views expressed by contributors to Bar News are not necessarily those of the New South Wales Bar 62 Bar history Association. Contributions are welcome and should John Walpole Willis be addressed to the editor, Jeremy Stoljar SC. 8th Floor Selborne Chambers 66 Appointments 8/174 Phillip Street Sydney 2000 69 Obituaries DX 395 Sydney Bill Grant OAM Contributions may be subject to editing prior to publication, at the discretion of the editor. 72 Book reviews Cover: Portrait of the Hon Justice Gageler 76 Bullfry by Tomas Maceiras Prego Bullfry and the wasteland 78 Advocata Tempus fugit 80 The Furies Bar News is published under a Creative Commons ‘free advertising’ license. You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material. Bar News : The Journal of the New South Wales Bar Association [2017] (Spring) Bar News 1 EDITOR'S NOTE Every now and then Bar News has the barrister’s work in mediations. opportunity to publish an important Geoffrey Watson SC has contributed piece of bar history. This issue’s article another excellent piece on legal history, by Sir Anthony Mason on the late Sir this one examining the version of justice Garfield Barwick is one such piece. meted out to Bob White, an African- It is not easy now to appreciate Barwick’s American accused of raping a white significance during his time at the woman in Texas in 1937. Jane Needham bar. These days the bar is much larger SC has a piece on succession law, with and more diversified. New chambers diversions into Dickens, Trollope and have opened up. Barristers practise Harry Potter. This issue also includes in different geographical areas and in an examination of the law of equitable different specialities. They don’t all know compensation for breach of confidence by each other. There is no one dominant Dr Peter Turner, with commentary by the figure, the way Barwick was. There may Hon Justice Mark Leeming. not be again. Since the last issue there has been a Barwick practised at the New South changing of the guard at Bar Council. Wales Bar from 1927 till 1958. He went Bar News thanks the outgoing president, on to become both attorney-general of Noel Hutley SC, for all his work during the Commonwealth and chief justice of his time in office. And we congratulate Australia. He died in 1997, aged 94 and thank the incoming president, Arthur Sir Anthony Mason knew Barwick well. Moses SC, on taking over the post and While still a law student he watched wish him the very best of luck in meeting Barwick on his feet in court. In due the challenges that will come his way. course he was briefed as Barwick’s junior Arthur’s inaugural column as president in many matters, as his article relates. appears on the next few pages. Through this article we can glimpse This will be my last issue as editor. I Barwick the barrister at work: confident, would like to thank all those who have eloquent, precise, extraordinarily contributed to Bar News over the years, efficient. Few lawyers have had so long most particularly the various members and illustrious career as Sir Anthony of the committee, past and present who Mason. He says of Barwick: ‘In my long have given so generously of their time. experience in the law he was the finest Bar News is the New South Wales Bar’s advocate I ever heard. This view was journal of record. It has been a privilege to widely shared.’ have been in charge for the last five years Elsewhere in this issue we look at the and to have served on the committee for important question of a barrister’s role quite a number of years before that. I wish in mediations. We are delighted to the incoming editor, Ingmar Taylor SC, include an address on this topic by the the best of luck in his new role. chief justice, the Hon T F Bathurst AC, Jeremy Stoljar SC entitled ‘Off with the wig’. Among other Editor things, the chief justice observes that in the light of recent decisions of the High Court it is unlikely that the conduct of a barrister in a mediation will be protected by the advocate’s immunity. David Ash has also contributed an article which examines comprehensively all aspects of a [2017] (Spring) Bar News 2 Bar News : The Journal of the New South Wales Bar Association PRESIDENT'S COLUMN The future of the New South Wales Bar: a time to reflect and act By Arthur Moses SC the New South Wales Bar is undergoing to work without an independent bar change. The policy dilemma for Bar does not explain the importance of the Council is that the bar might not be bar as an institution, which enhances the changing fast enough. Over the past administration of justice. On this issue, 14 years the total number of practising Chief Justice Mason stated: barristers in NSW has increased by only the adversary system can function 221. During this same period, the total without the establishment of an number of practising solicitors in NSW independent bar. Just how well it can has increased by more than 13,400. function is another question. 1 While the New South Wales Bar has not grown much, numerically speaking, Sir Owen Dixon, described by Sir it has grown older. Nearly one-third Anthony Mason as ‘Australia’s greatest of practising barristers are aged 60 or lawyer’, said the following, when sworn in over. Most of those are men. It is an as chief justice of Australia: aim of my presidency to recruit younger It is an honour and a privilege to be [B]ecause it is the duty of the practitioners and more women to the entrusted with the role of president of barrister to stand between the subject bar. This is vital to ensuring the New the New South Wales Bar Association, and the Crown, and between the rich South Wales Bar remains the largest and which I first joined in 1993 as a 24 year and the poor, the powerful and the strongest independent bar in Australia. old. I am mindful that I follow in the weak, it is necessary that, while the It is also an aim of my presidency to footsteps of giants of the New South bar occupies an essential part in the ensure that the Bar Association provide administration of justice, the barrister Wales Bar, including Tom Hughes QC, barristers with assistance in their practice should be completely independent Bret Walker SC and Ian Barker QC development and open up new sources of and work entirely as an individual, who have each mentored me over the work through engagement with in-house years. I look forward to working with my drawing on his own resources of solicitors employed by corporations. 2 colleagues on Bar Council to promote the learning, ability and intelligence. administration of justice and improve the The policy dilemma There are, of course, many good reasons practices of barristers. underpinning the observations of two of for Bar Council is that Australia’s greatest jurists. One reason is I acknowledge the service and dedication that having an independent bar facilitates of our former president, Noel Hutley the bar might not be the application of the cab rank principle, SC who has served on Bar Council since changing fast enough. which may otherwise be difficult, if not 2013 when we were both elected. At my impossible, to apply in the context of a first Bar Council meeting as president It is timely to reflect on why we exist as an ‘fused’ profession. on 11 May 2017, I moved that Hutley independent bar and note some of the SC and Justin Gleeson SC be awarded work that the Bar Council and our staff Barristers cannot pick and choose their life memberships of the Bar Association. under the leadership of Professor Greg clients and for good reason. Unpopular The motion was passed by universal Tolhurst is undertaking to assist the bar. I or offensive people or persons associated acclamation of the Bar Council. Gleeson spoke about some of these matters when I with unpopular causes would be left SC has returned to the New South Wales was invited to address the Tasmanian without representation in courts of justice.
Recommended publications
  • Curriculum Vitae – John Louis Whitington

    Curriculum Vitae – John Louis Whitington

    Curriculum vitae – John Louis Whitington Employment History John Whitington joined the Adelaide based Australian law firm Griffin Hilditch as a Graduate Clerk in August 2004 and was admitted to practice in December 2004. John has worked with Griffin Hilditch (now known as Griffins Lawyers) for the past 13 years as a member of the Commercial Litigation Group. Griffin Hilditch changed its name to Griffins Lawyers on 1 July 2010. Qualifications Admitted as a Legal Practitioner of the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory of Australia, December 2004 Admitted as a Barrister and Solicitor of the Supreme Court of South Australia, January 2005 Admitted as a Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of Australia, November 2005 Bachelor of Laws, Charles Darwin University, Australia, 2003 Graduate Diploma in Legal Practice, the College of Law, Sydney, 2004 Graduate Diploma in Applied Finance and Investment, the Financial Services Institute of Australasia (FINSIA), 2010 Professional Experience John’s recent professional experience includes: Reported decisions 1. Re Day [No.2] [2017] HCA 14 (5 April 2017) – John acted as instructing solicitor for former Senator Bob Day in the High Court proceedings (sitting as the Court of Disputed Returns) respecting Senator Day’s eligibility to sit in the Senate by reason of s 44(v) of the Constitution. (John also acted for current Senator Lucy Gichuhi in the proceedings following the special re-count of the Senate Ballot papers). 2. Re Day [2017] HCA 2 (27 January 2017) – John acted as instructing solicitor for former Senator Day in the factual trial before Gordon J in the High Court proceeding.
  • Process, but Also Assumes a Role in the Administration of the Court

    Process, but Also Assumes a Role in the Administration of the Court

    Mason process, but also assumes a role in the administration of the Court. Frank Jones Mason, Anthony Frank (b 21 April 1925; Justice 1972–87; Chief Justice 1987–95) was a member of the High Court for 23 years and is regarded by many as one of Australia’s great- est judges, as important and influential as Dixon.The ninth Chief Justice,he presided over a period ofsignificant change in the Australian legal system, his eight years as Chief Justice having been described as among the most exciting and important in the Court’s history. Mason grew up in Sydney, where he attended Sydney Grammar School. His father was a surveyor who urged him to follow in his footsteps; however, Mason preferred to follow in the footsteps of his uncle, a prominent Sydney KC. After serving with the RAAF as a flying officer from 1944 to 1945, he enrolled at the University of Sydney, graduating with first-class honours in both law and arts. Mason was then articled with Clayton Utz & Co in Sydney, where he met his wife Patricia, with whom he has two sons. He also served as an associate to Justice David Roper of the Supreme Court of NSW. He moved to the Sydney Bar in 1951, where he was an unqualified success, becoming one of Barwick’s favourite junior counsel. Mason’s practice was primarily in equity and commercial law,but he also took on a number ofconstitutional and appellate cases. After only three years at the Bar, he appeared before the High Court in R v Davison (1954), in which he successfully persuaded the Bench that certain sections of the Bankruptcy Act 1924 (Cth) invalidly purported to confer Anthony Mason, Justice 1972–87, Chief Justice 1987–95 in judicial power upon a registrar of the Bankruptcy Court.
  • Who's That with Abrahams

    Who's That with Abrahams

    barTHE JOURNAL OF THE NSWnews BAR ASSOCIATION | SUMMER 2008/09 Who’s that with Abrahams KC? Rediscovering Rhetoric Justice Richard O’Connor rediscovered Bullfry in Shanghai | CONTENTS | 2 President’s column 6 Editor’s note 7 Letters to the editor 8 Opinion Access to court information The costs circus 12 Recent developments 24 Features 75 Legal history The Hon Justice Foster The criminal jurisdiction of the Federal The Kyeema air disaster The Hon Justice Macfarlan Court NSW Law Almanacs online The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina The Hon Justice Ward Saving St James Church 40 Addresses His Honour Judge Michael King SC Justice Richard Edward O’Connor Rediscovering Rhetoric 104 Personalia The current state of the profession His Honour Judge Storkey VC 106 Obituaries Refl ections on the Federal Court 90 Crossword by Rapunzel Matthew Bracks 55 Practice 91 Retirements 107 Book reviews The Keble Advocacy Course 95 Appointments 113 Muse Before the duty judge in Equity Chief Justice French Calderbank offers The Hon Justice Nye Perram Bullfry in Shanghai Appearing in the Commercial List The Hon Justice Jagot 115 Bar sports barTHE JOURNAL OF THE NSWnews BAR ASSOCIATION | SUMMER 2008-09 Bar News Editorial Committee Cover the New South Wales Bar Andrew Bell SC (editor) Leonard Abrahams KC and Clark Gable. Association. Keith Chapple SC Photo: Courtesy of Anthony Abrahams. Contributions are welcome and Gregory Nell SC should be addressed to the editor, Design and production Arthur Moses SC Andrew Bell SC Jeremy Stoljar SC Weavers Design Group Eleventh Floor Chris O’Donnell www.weavers.com.au Wentworth Chambers Duncan Graham Carol Webster Advertising 180 Phillip Street, Richard Beasley To advertise in Bar News visit Sydney 2000.
  • What Is Past, Or Passing, Or to Come ___ 10F What Is Past, Or Passing, Or to Come ______

    What Is Past, Or Passing, Or to Come ___ 10F What Is Past, Or Passing, Or to Come ______

    1030 What is Past, or Passing, or to Come ____ 10f What is Past, or Passing, or to Come ______ ~ .... tcllbyby the HOI!HOIl Justice Michael Kirby A.C .. C.M.G., President afthealthe CaUTIo!Caurlo! Appeal afat the 1993 BenchBelich & Bar ',lrlUlerat which he was the guest afhonour.o/honour. ¥. ,!i}fi "Once 0111011I of nature I shall never raketake ~ Mybodi1yjormfrom~f bodilyfarm/rom anyany. natural (hing,rh~lIg. Asprey kept, hanging on the wall of his chambers. behind the B ~f slIcllslIch ajormalarm as Grecian goldsmithsgoldsnllfhs make chair at his desk. the famous cartoon of FE Smith. Next to that dfhammered gold and gold enamelling cartoon was hanging a mirror. Looking in the mirror"it was To keep a drowsy Emperor awake; natural to see oneself as a reflection of the great English Or set upon a golden bOllghbough to sing counsel. "[ To lords and ladies of ByzantiumByz.antium The President of the Incorporated Law Institute (as it O/wlw{OfwiwI is past.past, or passing. or to come." was called) was NormanNonnan Cowper, later to be knighted. Reg WBW B Yeats Downing was the State Auomey~General. The most senior silks were HVH V Evatt himself, his brother CliveCJive and CAC A : ....UTI< PAST Hardwick. Amongst the senior juniors were those memorable figures Wilf Sheppard, Walter Gee, Bertie Wright and On an occasion such as this, and in this common room.room, Humphrey Henchman - the lastofwhom 1I saw, evergreen, in 'ldsinevitableitisineviw,blethatthat an affliction of nostalgia will take the mind this place but a month ago. back through lheme lost years.
  • Seeing Visions and Dreaming Dreams Judicial Conference of Australia

    Seeing Visions and Dreaming Dreams Judicial Conference of Australia

    Seeing Visions and Dreaming Dreams Judicial Conference of Australia Colloquium Chief Justice Robert French AC 7 October 2016, Canberra Thank you for inviting me to deliver the opening address at this Colloquium. It is the first and last time I will do so as Chief Justice. The soft pink tones of the constitutional sunset are deepening and the dusk of impending judicial irrelevance is advancing upon me. In a few weeks' time, on 25 November, it will have been thirty years to the day since I was commissioned as a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia. The great Australian legal figures who sat on the Bench at my official welcome on 10 December 1986 have all gone from our midst — Sir Ronald Wilson, John Toohey, Sir Nigel Bowen and Sir Francis Burt. Two of my articled clerks from the 1970s are now on the Supreme Court of Western Australia. One of them has recently been appointed President of the Court of Appeal. They say you know you are getting old when policemen start looking young — a fortiori when the President of a Court of Appeal looks to you as though he has just emerged from Law School. The same trick of perspective leads me to see the Judicial Conference of Australia ('JCA') as a relatively recent innovation. Six years into my judicial career, in 1992, I attended a Supreme and Federal Courts Judges' Conference at which Justices Richard McGarvie and Ian Sheppard were talking about the establishment of a body to represent the common interests and concerns of judges, to defend the judiciary as an institution and, where appropriate, to defend individual judges who were the target of unfair and unwarranted criticisms.
  • The High Court and the Parliament Partners in Law-Making Or Hostile Combatants?*

    The High Court and the Parliament Partners in Law-Making Or Hostile Combatants?*

    The High Court and the Parliament Partners in law-making or hostile combatants?* Michael Coper The question of when a human life begins poses definitional and philosophical puzzles that are as familiar as they are unanswerable. It might surprise you to know that the question of when the High Court of Australia came into existence raises some similar puzzles,1 though they are by contrast generally unfamiliar and not quite so difficult to answer. Interestingly, the High Court tangled with this issue in its very first case, a case called Hannah v Dalgarno,2 argued—by Wise3 on one side and Sly4 on the other—on 6 and 10 November 1903, and decided the next day on a date that now positively reverberates with constitutional significance, 11 November.5 * This paper was presented as a lecture in the Department of the Senate Occasional Lecture Series at Parliament House on 19 September 2003. I am indebted to my colleagues Fiona Wheeler and John Seymour for their comments on an earlier draft. 1 See Tony Blackshield and Francesca Dominello, ‘Constitutional basis of Court’ in Tony Blackshield, Michael Coper and George Williams (eds), The Oxford Companion to the High Court of Australia, South Melbourne, Vic., Oxford University Press, 2001 (hereafter ‘The Oxford Companion’): 136. 2 (1903) 1 CLR 1; Francesca Dominello, ‘Hannah v Dalgarno’ in The Oxford Companion: 316. 3 Bernhard Ringrose Wise (1858–1916) was the Attorney-General for NSW and had been a framer of the Australian Constitution. 4 Richard Sly (1849–1929) was one of three lawyer brothers (including George, a founder of the firm of Sly and Russell), who all had doctorates in law.
  • Former CJ Spigelman Appointed to HK Court of Final Appeal FINAL

    Former CJ Spigelman Appointed to HK Court of Final Appeal FINAL

    Issued 9 April 2013 Former NSW Chief Justice appointed to Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Former NSW Chief Justice James Spigelman has been appointed to the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal. The appointment was announced yesterday in Hong Kong, jointly by the court’s Chief Justice, Mr Geoffrey Ma Tao-li, and the Chief Executive of Hong Kong, Mr C Y Leung. The Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal is the highest appellate court in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Established in 1997, it has the power of final adjudication with respect to the civil and criminal laws of Hong Kong. It comprises permanent Hong Kong judges, non-permanent Hong Kong judges and non- permanent common law judges from other jurisdictions. The Honourable Mr Justice Spigelman has been appointed a non-permanent judge from another common law jurisdiction. He will sit on appeals for a period of time each 12 to 18 months. He joins other distinguished Australian jurists previously appointed including three former Chief Justices of Australia, Sir Anthony Mason, Sir Gerard Brennan and Murray Gleeson, and, also announced yesterday, Justice William Gummow. The Honourable Mr Justice Spigelman was appointed NSW Chief Justice in May 1998 and served until May 2011. He is currently Chair of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (since April 2012). NSW Chief Justice Tom Bathurst congratulated his predecessor on this most recent appointment. "In addition to his significant contribution to the law in this state and country, Mr Spigelman was responsible for engaging with our legal colleagues throughout the Asian region in a way that had never been done before," Chief Justice Bathurst said.
  • 12 Chief Justice Gleeson and the Constitution

    12 Chief Justice Gleeson and the Constitution

    12 Chief Justice Gleeson and the Constitution Leslie Zines* Strict and complete legalism Murray Gleeson became Chief Justice of the High Court on 22 May 1998. As a barrister he had appeared before the High Court in constitutional cases on many occasions; but as Chief Justice of New South Wales for 10 years immediately preceding his High Court appointment he had little to do with such issues. During his first two or three years on the High Court he gave the impression of a judge who desired to swing the Court in a different direction, that is away from the methods and attitudes that characterised it in the previous 15 years or so. Whereas during the earlier period, particularly under the Chief Justice- ship of Sir Anthony Mason, a number of judges emphasised such matters as the interplay of policies, values, doctrine and principle, Gleeson CJ in several addresses to the Bar and the public spoke in favour of legalism, and not merely legalism, but ‘strict and complete legalism’ – the phrase made famous by Sir Owen Dixon when he used it during his swearing-in speech as Chief Justice in 1952. This can be contrasted with the lecture by Sir Anthony Mason at the University of Virginia in 1986, a year before he became Chief Justice, when he declared that the Court was moving away from the doctrine of legalism ‘towards a more policy oriented constitutional interpretation’,1 describing the new approach as ‘a species of legal realism’. He went on to say that the danger is that strict and complete legalism ‘will be a cloak for undisclosed and unidentified policy values’.
  • Opening of Sir Anthony Mason Chambers CHAMBERS

    Opening of Sir Anthony Mason Chambers CHAMBERS

    CHAMBERS Opening of Sir Anthony Mason Chambers By Elpi Chrysostomou The application of the harmonising art of history. As the ninth chief justice of creatures physical and spiritual which feng shui to barristers’ chambers and life the High Court and a member of that inhabit it. Native title, it seemed, had after the High Court were among other court for a total of 23 years, Sir Anthony survived like buried water in the bore of stories recounted recently by Sir Anthony presided during a number of landmark jurisprudence. It was the Sir Anthony Mason at the opening of the chambers cases including The Tasmanian Dam Case High Court that revealed it. named in his honour. (1983) 158 CLR 1, Teoh’s Case (1995) It has been said that Sir Anthony is 183 CLR 273, Dietrich v The Queen Sir Anthony Mason AC KBE GMB, known, not only for his keen intellect, (1992) 177 CLR 292, Cole v Whitfield former High Court chief justice, but also his wit. His persona in court has (1988) 165 CLR 360, Burnie Port accompanied by his wife, Lady Patricia, been described in the following words: Authority (1994) 179 CLR 520, Plenty were in Sydney on 25 July 2014 to v Dillon (1991) 171 CLR 635, and of He said relatively little but was very good formally open Sir Anthony Mason course Mabo (1992) 175 CLR 1. at progressing the business of argument. Chambers, Sydney. The combination of a commanding In that connection, British aphorist, Looking something akin to a busy Equity intelligence, vast experience, and an Geoffrey Madan, suggested that the List in Court 11E, it was standing room ability to convey by facial expression the destruction of ideas is much like the only as the occasion was attended by fact that the shelf-life of an argument had setting of a beautiful sunset.
  • Essays on Torts(Sydney,Law Book Company, 1989), P 98

    Essays on Torts(Sydney,Law Book Company, 1989), P 98

    LAW AND ECONOMICS MONASH LAW SCHOOL FOUNDATION LECTURE 25th MARCH 1992 THE HONOURABLE SIR ANTHONY MASON, AC, KBE CHIEF JUSTICE OF AUSTRALIA Economics has become the dominant theme in the public affairs of this coun- try. In an era of recession, economic considerations are the centrepiece of current political debate. The fortunes of the major political parties are said to hinge upon the success or acceptance of their economic policies. The media bombard us daily with the latest economic statistics and commentary on the significance of those statistics. The comparative advantages and detriments of competing economic philosophies are expounded at length in the news- papers and the electronic media. Economic rationalism which, we have been told, alone will save us from sinking into the abyss, is now challenged by the adherents of selective protection. The free tradelprotection debate which flourished at the time of Federation shows signs of coming to the fore once again. That this should be so is not surprising. Technological advance has empha- sized the interdependence of national economies and the fact that our national economy is but one piece in a worldwide mosaic. Ability to compete and efficiency are essential to economic well-being. In the light of these developments, one might have expected that by now economics would have had a marked impact upon the law and our legal sys- tem. Because both law and economics are disciplines concerned with the techniques and methodology of decision-making,economics has a capacity to contribute to legal decision-making, including the judicial process.' The ex- pectation that economics would make a significant contribution has been reinforced by the fact that law and economics and law and commerce have been courses studied in tandem by Australian law students for upwards of several decades now.
  • What Makes Originalism Original? a Comparative Analysis of Originalism and Its Role in Commerce Clause Jurisprudence in the United States and Australia

    What Makes Originalism Original? a Comparative Analysis of Originalism and Its Role in Commerce Clause Jurisprudence in the United States and Australia

    UCLA UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal Title What Makes Originalism Original? A Comparative Analysis of Originalism and Its Role in Commerce Clause Jurisprudence in the United States and Australia Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/60j4408j Journal UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, 23(1) Author Perlin, Adam A. Publication Date 2005 DOI 10.5070/P8231022179 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California COMMENT WHAT MAKES ORIGINALISM ORIGINAL?: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORIGINALISM AND ITS ROLE IN COMMERCE CLAUSE JURISPRUDENCE IN THE UNITED STATES AND AUSTRALIA Adam A. Perlin* INTRODUCTION Originalism reflects humankind's desire to connect with the past and to understand that which came before us. But history is not a single concrete idea. Instead, history is something specific and unique to every individual and inevitably plays different roles in different people's lives. For some, history may be a pre- diction, offering lessons from which we must learn if we are to avoid the same mistakes as our predecessors. For others, history serves as a tangible link between the now and the then, dangling before us the tantalizing prospect of understanding how it is we arrived at where we are today. Originalism, like the unique histories it reflects, will also mean different things to different people, or perhaps put more appropriately, to different national governing bodies. Each country, with its own past to discover and its own historical evolution, will struggle not only with the decision of whether his- torical analysis has any role in constitutional interpretation, but equally important, what that role should be and what form that role will take.
  • 10 in the High Court of Australia Sitting As The

    10 in the High Court of Australia Sitting As The

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA SITTING AS THE COURT OF DISPUTED RETURNS CANBERRA REGISTRY No. C30 of2017 RE MS SKYE KAKOSCHKE-MOORE Reference under s 3 76 of the 10 Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth) 20 ANNOTATED SUBMISSIONS OF TIMOTHY RAPHAEL STORER Filed on behalf of Timothy Raphael Storer by: Date of this Document: 22 January 2018 lies Selley Lawyers Telephone: (08) 8110 1700 4/333 King William Street Fax: (08) 8110 1799 ADELAIDE SA 5000 Email: [email protected] Ref: Dominic Agresta -2- ANNOTATED SUBMISSIONS OF TIMOTHY RAPHAEL STORER ("Mr Storer") Part I: Internet publication 1. These submissions are in a form suitable for publication on the interne!. Part 11: Statement of Issues 2. There appears to be no dispute that, at all relevant times prior to the 2016 election, Ms Kakoschke-Moore was disqualified under section 44(i) of the Constitution and was therefore not validly returned as elected. As a result, by letter addressed to the President of the Senate she resigned her place on 22 November 2017 citing her dual 10 citizenship as disentitling her from sitting under section 44(i) of the Constitution. Accordingly, there is no doubt that there is a current vacancy in the representation of South Australia in the Senate and all parties appear to agree that the vacancy is to be filled after a special count of the votes cast at the 2016 election. 3. The issues raised by this reference are limited to the following: 3 .1. Is there a vacancy in the representation of South Australia in the Senate by reason of section 44(i) of the Commonwealth Constitution? 3.2.