A Case Study of Brown University's New School of Engineering Building

Rolling Out IPD at Colleges and Universities: A Case Study of Brown University’s New School of Engineering Building Peter L’Hommedieu, SDC John Cooke, Brown University Mark Davis, KieranTimberlake

OCTOBER 18, 2017

CAPTURE AND LEVERAGE THE LEAN ADVANTAGE

• Greater understanding of specific issues relevant to the implementation of IPD on a university campus.

• How do you keep all stakeholders interests in mind during this process without overextending the project.

• Essential conditions for Peter L’Hommedieu John Cooke Mark Davis developing and maintaining Senior Project Manager Program Manager, Project Architect a collaborative environment Shawmut Integrated Projects KieranTimberlake for IPD success. Brown University TOPICS

1) IPD Decision 2) Project Overview 3) Academic Setting For IPD 4) Lessons Learned 5) Tak eaway s

New School of Engineering Building Providence, RI Architect: KieranTimberlake COLLABORATION JOURNEY

Design-Bid- CM@R (Enhanced / Multi-Party Contract Build CM@R ECI) Design-Build (IPD)

Design / Bid / Build CM-At-Risk Design / Build Multi-Party Contract (IPD)

OWNER OWNER OWNER OWNER

A/E CM A/E GC A/E CM A/E CM TRADE PARTNERS

SUB- SUB- Liability Gap CONSULTANT CONTRACTOR S S Why IPD? Institutional Progression Increasing Collaboration Multi-Party Contract Design-Bid-Build CM@R CM@R (Enhanced / ECI) Design-Build (IPD)

Nelson Fitness / Aquatics Center Design-Build (2012) Metcalfe Renovation Granoff Center Design-Bid-Build (2011) CM @ Risk – Enhanced (2010) New School of Engineering Integrated Project Delivery Ivy League Endowments (source: Business Insider) (2017) 1. Harvard University — $36.4 billion 2. Yale University — $23.9 billion Barus & Holley Infrastructure 3. Princeton University — $21.0 billion Integrated Project Delivery (2013) 4. University of Pennsylvania — $9.6 billion 85 Waterman Renovation 5. Columbia University — $9.2 billion Design-Build (2014) 6. Cornell University — $6.2 billion 7. Dartmouth College — $4.5 billion 8. Brown University — $3.2 billion Scope Document Exhibit B-1: 3 pages Budget: $77.6M ($68.5 Construction, $9.1 Design)

Employed benchmarking, but not full cost /scope validation due to nature of the project and not-yet- assigned end-users / occupants Project Mission: Cultivate the exchange of ideas, foster the spirit of inquiry, and inspire and enable people to do great science and engineering at Brown for the next fifty years or more.

value 1 World Class Research Facility: Build a world-class research facility that enables great science and engineering, attracts the best talent in faculty, researchers, and students, and enhances the reputation and prestige of the School of Engineering.

value 2 Sustainability: Serve as a model of sustainability and best-practice design in balance with institutional priorities and freedom of scientific inquiry.

value 3 Community Enhancement: Engage and enhance the community – in Engineering, the Sciences, and the broader University.

value 4 Identity: Give shape to a physical and symbolic identity for the School of Engineering that builds upon the best traditions of Brown’s rich and distinctive heritage of buildings and landscapes. BUILDING PROGRAM NASF

Research & Collaboration – 22 Labs 29,200 sf

Shared facilities 7,500 sf

Micro-electronics Cleanroom 6,000

Bio-Cleanroom 1,500

Imaging suite 1,500 Collaborative / Public Spaces 4,834 sf

Total GSF 80,000 sf

2013 EXPANSION DESIGN LAB DESIGN (12 of 20) LABS (2 of 8) STUDY 16 MONTHS

ENABLING WORK CONSTRUCTION 24 MONTHS

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 PAYETTE BAR BUILDING VS

ORIGINAL EXPANSION STUDY MASSING FINAL SOE DESIGN Freestanding building with limited connections Deeply integrated with and connected to existing buildings to existing infrastructure and labs, with seven connections and new integrated lobby

IPD At a Major University

What did we learn from working at a major university? How did each of these issues play out?

- Building as a recruitment tool with users still TBD

Process and Flow

IPD At a Major University

What did we learn from working at a major university? How did each of these issues play out?

- Building as a recruitment tool with users still TBD - Multiple stakeholders and decision-making hierarchy / Shepherding design decisions through the upper levels of University Leadership - Ownership and stewardship of decision making - Competing interests within the university (budget, longevity, maintenance, user concerns etc.)

Process and Flow Why IPD IPD At a Major University

What did we learn from working at a major university? How did each of these issues play out?

Process and Flow Process and Flow Process and Flow Designing Workflows

How we built the Trade Partner and Design Teams - Focus on compatibility / culture over bottom line - Familiarity with Brown construction standards and expectations, local market - What trades and design team members should have been partners, and which should not have?

Process and Flow Process and Flow Designing Workflows

Colocation Workspace - Flexible open space - Staffing colocation to specific needs of the project (remote design team) - Use of remote colocation tools – GoToMeeting, videoconferencing, Bluebeam Site, Sharepoint Site, Collaborate for Revit, BIM360 Field, Glue - Place to bring University stakeholders in to the project, immerse them in culture of the project

Process and Flow

Future IPD Projects on the Boards at Brown

Wilson Hall Watson Institute GeoChem Performing Arts Center Addition Renovation + New Building Renovation New Construction 2020

1 Technical Expertise & Project Management Support

2 Continuance of Past Success

3 Program Stewardship through Multi-year, Multi-project Agreement.

4 Multi-project Collaboration to Maximum Savings and Best in Class Service

5 Partnership between Brown and Highly Collaborative CM to Enable a Much Deeper and Far More Innovative Commitment • Greater Understanding of IPD at Universities

• Owner / Architect / CM Perspectives

• Lessons Learned on Improving Collaboration

New School of Engineering Building Providence, RI Architect: KieranTimberlake SLIDE ASSIGNMENTS JOHN: Slides 2, 3, 4, 5 PETE: Slide 6 JOHN: Slide 7 – Mission & Values MARK: 8, 9, 10, 11

MARK: 12 &13 JOHN: 14 & 15 PETE: 16 & 17 & 18 PETE: 19, 20 MARK: 21, 22 MARK & PETE: 23, 24 JOHN: 25